From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 00:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010011.n810BVHR025739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-08-31 20:11:30 EDT --- Upstream seems to have a sense of humor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 00:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010013.n810DXXM014175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #2 from Alex Musolino 2009-08-31 20:13:33 EDT --- Made appropriate changes as per above. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 01:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520540] New: Review Request: ibus-table-viqr - Viqr table for IBus-Table. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-viqr - Viqr table for IBus-Table. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520540 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-viqr - Viqr table for IBus-Table. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-viqr.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-viqr-1.2.0.20090901-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Viqr table for IBus-Table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 03:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010320.n813KsOk025465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 23:20:53 EDT --- Anyway thanks for picking up the haskell-platform - I hadn't been following and it is starting to make sense now. (In reply to comment #8) > Are they the same version? Good question - sure we need to keep the package in sync with haskell-platform. > Personally, i'd rather deliver as many libraries via > subpackages anyways. Hmm, well I thought about this too - weighing the effort of separate packages with the complexity of haskell-platform subpackages. Anyway we seems to have started going down the separate package path which which should be good and fine as long as we are careful to preserve version: I'll add a comment about haskell-platform in the spec file and suggest we do the same for all packages that form a part of Platform. (In reply to comment #9) > Is the tarball from hackage then? Some of the tarballs Bryan used came from the > platform tarball and for some reason did not checksum properly. It was the only > problem we found, and for the matter of speed, i let it slide, as the reviewer. That is a no-no really - either we use the hackage packages or the haskell-platform tarball I don't think we should mix them - presumably all haskell-platform packages are available as separate tarballs since haskell-platform also is distributed without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 03:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010325.n813PWom014363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 23:25:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is the tarball from hackage then? Anyway yes it is: I just checked - please do so next time: I usually include the md5sum in the review. 948b5b20ff22fa81c6390b08d6af5104 HUnit-1.2.0.3.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 03:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010356.n813uXdV031213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #11 from John Roman 2009-08-31 23:56:31 EDT --- debugging the smp build fail with devs at epic. cleaning up my .spec so it builds on more than my pc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010433.n814XZUm004540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag| |needinfo- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] New: Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Summary: Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phrkonaleash at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: Hello all! I have finished packaging IVAN (http://ivan.sf.net) for Fedora 11 and would like it to be reviewed for inclusion into Fedora 11. Iter Vehemens ad Necum is a graphical roguelike game. It features advanced bodypart and material handling, multi-colored lighting and, above all, deep gameplay. As this is my first package to be reviewed, I guess I will need a sponsor. I am also without a place to host these files, currently. I suppose uploading to the RH bugzilla will work temporarily, but if anyone has any other suggestions, please let me know. Rpmlint reports a few errors on the package but they are all pretty much related to this being a game: ivan.i586: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/ivan 02755 (setgid) ivan.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/games/ivan games (per the Games SIG packaging guidelines this is OKAY) ivan.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/ivan 0775 (per the Games SIG packaging guidelines this is OKAY) ivan.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/games/ivan/ivan-highscore.scores games (per the Games SIG packaging guidelines this is OKAY) ivan.i586: E: zero-length /var/games/ivan/ivan-highscore.scores (some strange issue in opening this file makes it impossible to create even if it is fopen'd "wb", so I have included it in the package) ivan.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/games/ivan/Bones games (per the Games SIG packaging guidelines this is OKAY) ivan.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/ivan/Bones 0775 (per the Games SIG packaging guidelines this is OKAY) This package does NOT currently handle setgid privileges properly and runs as setgid from start to finish, which is technically against Games SIG's packaging guidelines. I am currently requesting help from fedora-packagers mailing list on this issue. Because the game creates a Bones file after the user dies in /var/games/ivan/Bones, it is impossible to drop setgid at the start of the application, as it is with the highscores file (which, because it's encased in a few classes, is also a bear to run with setgid off) Any suggestions/help on this issue is much appreciated. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010431.n814Vstg024962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-01 00:31:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359344) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359344) IVAN srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010430.n814Ut0r024751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-01 00:30:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359343) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359343) IVAN spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 04:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010434.n814YEgj004641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 05:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 01:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010532.n815W5pb014347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010601.n8161ah5019490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-09-01 02:01:35 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nforenum Short Description: A format correcter and linter for the NFO language Owners: heffer Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010603.n8163j5b019766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-01 02:03:44 EDT --- I think my note about the patch comments was a bit unclear. I didn't mean to add the comments to the patch files but before Patch0 and Patch1 in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:08:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010608.n8168PHZ020595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Bug 507491 depends on bug 504389, which changed state. Bug 504389 Summary: RFE: update to 0.11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504389 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010612.n816C7OC009715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |perl-forks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010618.n816IbkB022457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 02:18:37 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010618.n816If9A022490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 02:18:41 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010618.n816IWw2010630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 02:18:31 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010622.n816MP1V023378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-01 02:22:24 EDT --- Heh. The BR logic is incorrect, it should be perl(Sys::SigAction) >= 0.11 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010620.n816KP56023137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-01 02:20:25 EDT --- Koji (FAILURE) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010625.n816P5Pq024012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 02:25:04 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:27:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010627.n816RNSQ024451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 02:27:22 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010625.n816PwPl012058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 02:25:58 EDT --- Correct url http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010628.n816S3mG012430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 02:28:01 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130078 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010626.n816QUkt012255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 02:26:29 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] New: Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes Alias: perl-Moose-Autobox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Summary: Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Moose-Autobox OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Moose-Autobox.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Moose-Autobox-0.09-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Moose::Autobox provides an implementation of SCALAR, ARRAY, HASH & CODE for use with autobox. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647297 Additional Comment: This package is a BR of a new BR (CatalystX::Component::Traits) of the latest Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] New: Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Summary: Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fdinitto at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/rgmanager/1/rgmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://fabbione.fedorapeople.org/rgmanager/1/rgmanager-3.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Red Hat Resource Group Manager provides high availability of critical server applications in the event of planned or unplanned system downtime. NOTE: this package already exists in fedora-cvs. We are going through the review process to resurrect it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 06:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 02:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010655.n816tWuG029647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Andrew Beekhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at beekhof.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at beekhof.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Beekhof 2009-09-01 02:55:30 EDT --- I'll take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Traits-Pluggable OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module adds support for class precedence search for traits and some extra attributes, described below. See the MooseX::Traits manpage for more information. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647316 Additional Comment: This package is a BR of a new BR (CatalystX::Component::Traits) of the latest Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520568] New: Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 Summary: Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-purple.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-purple-0.1-0.0.git20090901.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Python-purple is a python bind for libpurple. It was written using Cython extension. Python-purple provides fully access to libpurple functions from python programs. You only need to import purple.so module (e.g. import purple from python shell) to start using python-purple. Highly experimental and incomplete. USE AT YOUR OWN PERIL! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520568] Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010729.n817TlDD022780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-01 03:29:45 EDT --- Scratch build in koji is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] New: Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Summary: Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-mkimage.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-mkimage-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: U-Boot mkimage utility -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010729.n817TaFl003338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |galak at kernel.crashing.org --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-01 03:29:32 EDT --- *** Bug 448661 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010733.n817XKpV004152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 03:33:18 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010729.n817TZNP003315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #21 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-01 03:29:32 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 520569 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] New: Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Summary: Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/devio.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/devio-1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: devio is a command line utility intended to read and write on block devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010731.n817Vb3j003900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Andrew Beekhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Beekhof 2009-09-01 03:31:36 EDT --- Pretty straight forward... [beekhof at ppc ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-ppc64/result/*.rpm rgmanager.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Review: OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum (spec based on pre-release tarball). OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647332 OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs. OK - Should have dist tag. OK - Should package latest version. OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. Good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010733.n817Xbbr023462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 03:33:36 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 07:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 03:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010747.n817lIqQ026783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-01 03:47:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rgmanager New Branches: F-10 F-11 devel Hi guys, we are resurrecting the package from ashes. The current binary rpm is built from cluster.srpm. we would like to start building rgmanager again from rgmanager.srpm. the fedora-cvs entry for rgmanager already exists but it's marked as dead.package. I am not even 100% sure i need to file a cvs request because i could theoretically reopen devel/ myself. Please let me know if there is any further step I need to take. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 08:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010807.n8187awT011233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 04:07:35 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 08:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010807.n8187KVG011088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 04:07:18 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130084 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 08:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010810.n818AVPe012304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 04:10:29 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 08:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010810.n818A9eg012038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 04:10:08 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 08:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 04:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010847.n818lLPE021202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 10:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011003.n81A3Ul6004198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-09-01 06:03:29 EDT --- OK, here are just a few issues: - remove BR: maven2-plugin-surefire (obsoleted by maven2) - is there any reason to use the Epoch: 0 tag? If not please remove it. - the creation of local maven repository could go into the with_maven conditional Otherwise the package is sane: + follows general guidelines (proper licensing, builds from source, proper instructions for getting source, ...) + follows Java guidelines (builds with maven in offline repo, installs into proper maven locations, docs are in -javadoc, ...) + builds in current rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647555 Provided the BR & Epoch mentioned above will be fixed when importing, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 10:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011035.n81AZX49027598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 06:35:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > OK, here are just a few issues: > > - remove BR: maven2-plugin-surefire (obsoleted by maven2) It is needed during the build. Changed to the obsoleting package maven-surefire-maven-plugin. > - is there any reason to use the Epoch: 0 tag? If not please remove it. Removed. > - the creation of local maven repository could go into the with_maven > conditional No. It can not go because ant build.xml is generated by mvn ant:ant which requires maven repository to work. > > Otherwise the package is sane: > + follows general guidelines (proper licensing, builds from source, proper > instructions for getting source, ...) > + follows Java guidelines (builds with maven in offline repo, installs into > proper maven locations, docs are in -javadoc, ...) > + builds in current rawhide: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647555 > > Provided the BR & Epoch mentioned above will be fixed when importing, this > package is APPROVED. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-embedder.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-embedder-2.0.4-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 10:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011038.n81AcA2E028046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-01 06:38:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-embedder Short Description: The Maven Embedder is used by the Maven CLI, by IDE integration and others. Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 11:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011125.n81BPLpN004719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-01 07:25:19 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Nagios-Plugin New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ruben jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 11:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011124.n81BOiIA004356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-01 07:24:43 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Nagios-Plugin New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ruben jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 11:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011126.n81BQipi005054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502332 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 11:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011146.n81BkUhQ009215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Josh Boyer 2009-09-01 07:46:29 EDT --- I'm not really thrilled with this package. It is very hard to determine what version of U-Boot the mkimage utility has been derived from. Looking it over, it seems to lack support for the FIT images. It also looks like it is derived from the openwrt project instead of the actual upstream U-Boot project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 12:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011226.n81CQ8GQ032576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jwboyer at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-01 08:26:07 EDT --- Yes, the history of the code is a bit complicated, originally in U-Boot, then in openwrt and now maintained and used by Debian. Josh, if you think it would be better to use mkimage from the recent U-Boot, I can switch to it. It looked as overkill to me to carry 8+ MB of sources for just this little utility. I know, disk space is cheap ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 12:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011239.n81CdTcH003069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-01 08:39:28 EDT --- Sorry for long delays, been quiet busy... http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhn-client-tools/rhn-client-tools.spec http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhn-client-tools/rhn-client-tools-0.7.1-1.src.rpm I changed .desktop according your suggestion. I move dependecy on yum-rhn-plugin to rhn-check, where it should be. But I'm not sure about rhn-setup and rhnsd. rhn-setup is subpackage of rhn-client-tools, rhnsd is standalone package whose review will follow shortly. rhnsd require rhn-check (again subpackage of rhn-client-tools). So I can not submit review till rhn-client-tools are accepted. I'm not sure how to fix this. And I would like to avoiding to merging those two packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011303.n81D3AJk026520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-01 09:03:09 EDT --- Copyright fixed: spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-info.spec srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-info-3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011313.n81DDqZB029350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-01 09:13:49 EDT --- In rawhide. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011313.n81DDtYU029450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Bug 518446 depends on bug 506825, which changed state. Bug 506825 Summary: Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011313.n81DDsJ0029424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Bug 506855 depends on bug 506825, which changed state. Bug 506825 Summary: Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011324.n81DO3xY014869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #27 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-01 09:24:01 EDT --- Closing as its now in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520621] New: Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520621 Summary: Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rsarraf at netapp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~laptop-mode-tools-dev/laptop-mode-tools/main/download/head:/laptopmodetools.spec-20090724093155-g4ir4u16u9tyn7ik-1/laptop-mode-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.researchut.com/tmp/laptop-mode-tools-1.50-1.src.rpm Description: Laptop mode is a Linux kernel feature that allows your laptop to save considerable power, by allowing the hard drive to spin down for longer periods of time. This package contains the userland scripts that are needed to enable laptop mode. It includes support for automatically enabling laptop mode when the computer is working on batteries. It also supports various other power management features, such as starting and stopping daemons depending on power mode, automatically hibernating if battery levels are too low, and adjusting terminal blanking and X11 screen blanking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011332.n81DWrsv002194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Michal Schmidt 2009-09-01 09:32:52 EDT --- I used cpanspec (recommended by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl) to verify I'd get something similar to your spec file. There were only two non-trivial differences: - Your specfile has: %{?perl_default_filter} - I did not find it mentioned in the guidelines, but I found some BZs explaining it and I believe it is correct. - My generated specfile has: Requires: perl(Task::Weaken) Perhaps you should add it? Or explain to me why it should not be there. Review Guidelines check: ( [?] means OK; [-] means irrelevant; No problems were found.) [?] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. perl-POE-Component-Pluggable.src: I: checking perl-POE-Component-Pluggable.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [?] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [?] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. I checked http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl and found no problems. [?] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [?] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic [?] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [?] The spec file must be written in American English. [?] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [?] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. sha256sum 99610245e893b59f8096a9fddaef55f3bf79cba2afc171c9b958ae75acfb2018 [?] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [-] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [?] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [-] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [-] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [-] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [?] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [?] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [?] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [?] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [?] Each package must consistently use macros. [?] The package must contain code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [?] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [-] Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [-] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [-] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [?] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [-] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [?] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [?] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [?] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Summary: Just solve the 'Requires: perl(Task::Weaken)' issue, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011346.n81Dk14O006514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #19 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-09-01 09:45:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I can look at this, but not for another week. I suggest emailing upstream in > the mean time for assistance. I mailed upstream on Aug 23rd but I haven't received yet an answer. Bye, Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011349.n81DnN06020914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #15 from Luke Macken 2009-09-01 09:49:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > What happened to the Fedora 11 update to add this package? > > It's been two months - perhaps it can go straight to stable at this point? Fedora 11's Python2.6 comes with the wsgiref module built in, so there is no need for this package on that branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011349.n81DnA1o020869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jwboyer at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Josh Boyer 2009-09-01 09:49:08 EDT --- I agree that carrying the full source is excessive. However, the way mkimage is built requires you to configure U-Boot for a board first. Newer versions also rely on the libfdt support in the U-Boot source code. So creating a trimmed down package can be done, but it would need to be done carefully. The config part is the trickiest. Configuring it for e.g. and i686 board may not be what you want if you are trying to build a PowerPC uImage, etc. I don't know off the top of my head, but some inspection would be needed if this were to be done in a general fashion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011356.n81DuJLp022790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-01 09:56:18 EDT --- http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/ <-- this contains SRPM and SPEC now; supersedes attached files, though at the moment they are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 13:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011359.n81Dxubx023304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #11 from Luke Macken 2009-09-01 09:59:55 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-2.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec * Tue Sep 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0.3-2 - Remove the SQLAlchemy requirement, as python-zope-sqlalchemy is now set to include the appropriate version * Wed Aug 12 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0.3-1 - 2.0.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011406.n81E6QEu025255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 10:06:24 EDT --- beacon-0.5-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beacon-0.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011406.n81E6WNP011697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 10:06:31 EDT --- beacon-0.5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/beacon-0.5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011443.n81EhtQB020175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-01 10:43:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > * Tue Sep 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0.3-2 > - Remove the SQLAlchemy requirement, as python-zope-sqlalchemy > is now set to include the appropriate version Does TG2 require SQLAlchemy only indirectly via python-zope-sqlalchemy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011445.n81EjU5d001916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #13 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-01 10:45:29 EDT --- BTW: %if 0%{?fedora} <= 6 BuildRequires: python-wsgiref %endif Why this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] New: Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Summary: Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk-1.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MDK stands for MIX Development Kit, and provides tools for developing and executing, in a MIX virtual machine, MIXAL programs. The MIX is Donald Knuth's mythical computer, described in the first volume of The Art of Computer Programming, which is programmed using MIXAL, the MIX assembly language. MDK includes a MIXAL assembler (mixasm) and a MIX virtual machine (mixvm) with a command line interface. In addition, a GTK+ GUI to mixvm, called gmixvm, is provided; and, in case you are an Emacs guy, you can try misc/mixvm.el, which allows running mixvm inside an Emacs GUD buffer. Using these interfaces, you can debug your MIXAL programs at source code level, and read/modify the contents of all the components of the MIX computer (including block devices, which are simultated using the file system). I'm looking for a sponsor, or if someone wishes to take over this package I'll agree on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011458.n81Ew7rN023976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 14:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 10:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011458.n81Ewa6c024056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 15:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011530.n81FUwUi032304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-01 11:30:56 EDT --- After a brief look into the code it looks to me that mkimage doesn't depend on the configured board, libfdt and mkimage are build with USE_HOSTCC defined and mkimage uses its own *.o for libfdt code. Thus IMHO it could be safe to configure u-boot for any board. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 15:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011537.n81Fb4q4014164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-01 11:36:55 EDT --- Okay. (In reply to comment #9) > Hmm. I'm getting an rpmlint warning on the subpackages for not including any > documentation. Should I report this bug to fedora-packaging? ;) It is a warning and if the needed documents are already included in the main package this warning can be ignored. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libtelnet) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 15:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011538.n81Fcq9N001988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-01 11:38:49 EDT --- Now libtelnet (bug 515832) is approved: ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (gnome-mud) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- Now please create Fedora account (see my comments on bug 515832) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 15:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011543.n81FhCgK015484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-01 11:43:09 EDT --- With pure 0.33: F-12 Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1648278 on i686, every tests pass; on x86_64, the same four tests have to be disabled The updated LLVM for F-11 has not landed yet, but Koji build against the current version, which is non-functional on %{ix86} due to PIC issue, bizarrely pass all tests on x86_64. Looks indeed like a Rawhide glibc/llvm/pure interaction; in any case, only string operations are affected, bignum and numerical operations are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 15:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011555.n81Ftkpo005471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Federico Hernandez 2009-09-01 11:55:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: task Short Description: An open source, command-line, TODO list manager Owners: ultrafredde New Branch: F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011603.n81G3GF8019812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-01 12:03:14 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011605.n81G5dke007993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-01 12:05:37 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011607.n81G7a1S021251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |bnocera at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-09-01 12:07:35 EDT --- Picking up from Bill. The copyright issue was fixed, and rpmlint is clean, so this looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011611.n81GBmbo022278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-01 12:11:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: media-player-info Short Description: Data files describing media player capabilities Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011614.n81GEvZ3009767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #20 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-01 12:14:54 EDT --- I agree with Andrea, probably best deal is to not run unit tests as debian folks have done; the failures in the tests are due to bad coding in the tests themselves, setting up a workaround to let it compile would be silly while patching the code would require a pretty big patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011650.n81Goe24016767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #13 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-01 12:50:38 EDT --- Once I figured out that the checksums were different, I rolled the real RPMs that are now in rawhide from the original packages on hackage, not the platform tarball. So this won't arise again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011655.n81GtMHR018499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #4 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-01 12:55:21 EDT --- Sorry about that. Comments added to spec file regarding patches as per above. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] New: Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 Summary: Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Telepathy-Qt4 is a high-level binding for Telepathy, similar to telepathy-glib, but for Qt 4. This package provides various documentation on using the Qt4 bindings for Telepathy-Qt4. I'm having a little trouble fitting the /examples and /tests directories anywhere. They both contain executables and I'm getting lots of W: doc-file-dependency, W: hidden-file-or-dir, E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share which I don't know how to handle, or if I should ignore in this case. I'm looking for a sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011658.n81GwEaO019389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 17:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011728.n81HSHai005301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-01 13:28:16 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1648389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 17:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011728.n81HSWRT024928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |overholt at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-01 13:28:31 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1648389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 17:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011751.n81Hp9OF009647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-01 13:51:08 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1648456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 17:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011750.n81Hovg8009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-01 13:50:56 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1648456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011805.n81I5VBM032067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:05:30 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:05:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011805.n81I5anq032099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |9.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011808.n81I8bst013779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:08:36 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011805.n81I5m1j013020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:05:47 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011805.n81I5qhp013050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|9.0-2.fc11 |9.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011804.n81I4wRe012472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:04:57 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update icoutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011808.n81I8gOf000490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|64-3.fc11 |64-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011806.n81I6J6r032561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:06:18 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011806.n81I6OQS032605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |64-3.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011808.n81I83cv000390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-01 14:08:02 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update icoutils'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 18:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011840.n81IeTkq021330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #23 from Pascal Parois 2009-09-01 14:40:25 EDT --- The answer: "Sorry, I don't know a lot about Linux so you are going to have to give me more details. All the make files I provide are produced automatically with my genmake program. It may be possible to modify this to produce the changes you want, but only if you explain exactly what is required." I don't know genmake, it doesn't seem to handle versioned soname ? If anyone has any idea to deal with the situation, you are welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 19:12:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011912.n81JCd2n028105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-01 15:12:38 EDT --- The init.d script. Largely inspired by: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript again , this is all really upstream stuff. 1) Running start on running service should be a success. # /etc/init.d/voms start Starting voms(other): VOMS (2790) is already running [FAILED] Starting voms(test): VOMS (2806) is already running [FAILED] 2) Running stop on stopped service should be success. # /etc/init.d/voms stop Stopping voms(other): [FAILED] Stopping voms(test): [FAILED] 3) Generally there is a lot of white space and new lines between message and the [OK] or [FAIL] 4) If I start and then kill the daemons. # /etc/init.d/voms start Starting voms(other): [ OK ] Starting voms(test): [ OK ] it returns status okay. As for what should happen when one of the configured process is not running I guess that if any one is not running then status should return not running. 5) Adding some basic sanity checks makes sense. e.g [ ! -r $X509_USER_KEY ] && echo -n "$prog: No hostkey file" && failure && echo && exit 5 [ ! -r $X509_USER_CERT ] && echo -n "$prog: No hostcert file" && failure && echo && exit 5 same if /etc/voms is empty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 19:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011914.n81JEqDQ028539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-01 15:14:51 EDT --- Sorry ignore (4) above. My mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 19:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011918.n81JI6DF029483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 19:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011950.n81JoCpR007402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mgoodwin at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #18 from Jarod Wilson 2009-09-01 15:50:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Jarod, thanks - I think I've addressed most of your questions, apart > from the C source files, which I'll get to early next week if not sooner. Just checking in to see where we're at on this. I think I was waiting to hear back on this part before doing another (hopefully the last) pass over things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 20:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012018.n81KIAx5015356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-01 16:18:09 EDT --- ? rpmlint output rpmlint libtnc.spec libtnc-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm libtnc-1.19-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libtnc-devel-1.19-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libtnc-debuginfo-1.19-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libtnc.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libosc_imv.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license ? should package the latest version there's a version 1.22 out on the site + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 4150bb183a9b6aa0af0f48359b024912 libtnc-1.19.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files ? Package perserves timestamps on install + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin Issues: - rpmlint output - I don't believe that its a problem. - there's a newer version 1.22 upstream - not sure if the lovely autotools preserves timestamps. Possibly use: make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install INSTALL='install -p' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps I don't see any of the above issues as blockers. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 20:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] New: Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 Summary: Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/seeker.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/seeker-3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Seeker is a simple utility that reads small pieces of data from a raw disk device in a random access pattern, and reports the average number of seeks per second, and calculated random access time of the disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 21:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] New: Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Summary: Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: admin at irben.id.lv QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://irben.id.lv/linux/rpm/SPEC/deadbeef.spec SRPM URL: http://irben.id.lv/linux/rpm/SRPM/deadbeef-0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: DeaDBeeF is an audio player for GNU/Linux systems with X11 written in C and C++. Features: minimal depends native GTK2 GUI; cuesheet support; mp3, ogg, flac; chiptune formats with subtunes, song-length databases, etc; small memory footprint. Provided files are for Fedora 11 x86_64. Sorry, this is my first package and I don't know how to find dependencies needed for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 21:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012128.n81LSWlY016252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Jurijs Kolomijecs changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://deadbeef.sourceforge | |.net/ CC| |admin at irben.id.lv Platform|All |x86_64 Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 21:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012138.n81LcG0H032034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 21:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012138.n81LcgbI018191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 21:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::DBIC::Schema adds easy access to a DBIx::Class::Schema to your Titanium or CGI::Application modules. Lazy loading is used to prevent a database connection from being made if the schema method is not called during the request. In other words, the database connection is not created until it is actually needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: dennis at ausil.us ReportedBy: mharmsen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=359453) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359453) tomcatjss.spec First pass at tomcatjss package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012304.n81N4gQi015004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-09-01 19:04:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359454) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359454) tomcatjss SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012322.n81NM6An005192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012328.n81NSCcw019707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-01 19:28:11 EDT --- for future reference please dont post spec files and srpm as attachments to bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012350.n81Nodv8010431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-01 19:50:38 EDT --- rpm link gives some warnings rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result tomcatjss.src: W: strange-permission tomcatjss.spec 0600 tomcatjss.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tomcatjss-1.2.0/README tomcatjss.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tomcatjss-1.2.0/LICENSE we should make sure the docs are not executable source is not available for download at the url in the spec fedora 8 has not been supported for some time now # Override the default 'pki_jdk' and 'pki_jre' on Fedora 8 platforms %{?fc8:%define pki_jdk java-devel >= 1.7.0} %{?fc8:%define pki_jre java >= 1.7.0} should be removed along with the pki_jdk and pki_jre macros /var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib/tomcatjss.jar in %files should be %{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib/tomcatjss.jar mkdir -p %{buildroot}/var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib cd %{buildroot}/var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib should be mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib cd %{buildroot}%{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] New: Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Summary: Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/gprof2dot.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/gprof2dot-1.0-0.1.20090901svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a Python script to convert the output from prof, gprof, oprofile, Shark, AQtime, and python profilers into a dot graph. It has the following features: * can correctly parse C++ template function names * allows to prune nodes and edges below a certain threshold * uses an heuristic to propagate time inside mutually recursive functions * uses color efficiently to draw attention to hot-spots -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020012.n820CTjN027752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Mark Goodwin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mgoodwin at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #19 from Mark Goodwin 2009-09-01 20:12:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Jarod, thanks - I think I've addressed most of your questions, apart > > from the C source files, which I'll get to early next week if not sooner. > > Just checking in to see where we're at on this. I think I was waiting to hear > back on this part before doing another (hopefully the last) pass over things. Hi Jarod, thanks for checking back - sorry I've been completely snowed under with other stuff. I've moved the C source to a better place and have just a few things left to clean up, so I'll make a concerted effort on that front :) We also had a discussion on freenode.net #pcp about what to do with the Perl binding for PCP. Perhaps you could provide some guidance here for the packaging perspective - the perl binding is part of the main src tree (below src/cpan) but the packaging is currently driven by MakeMaker (with a manual step to build the pcp perl RPMs from the resulting spec). Ideally, we'd like the perl binding to be a sub-package, e.g. "pcp-perl-this-and-that", with the build and packaging all driven by the main spec. I have some simple changes to the spec that implements this but it probably violates the Fedora Perl packaging guidelines - anything perl'ish should be named "perl-something". So the only way to resolve that would be to run MakeMaker in %build or %install and to generate additional perl-pcp-something RPMs that way ... which seems hacky. Any advice? maybe we should split the PCP perl binding into a separate src tree, with appropriate BuildRequires dependencies? Cheers -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020014.n820EigB028026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-01 20:14:43 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan :) I still feel like it is going to be hard to keep all the separate packages in sync and avoid accidental version bumps, etc and wonder if packaging the full haskell-platform package might not be easier maintenance-wise? We are still missing a lot of extralibs and platform packages anyway in Fedora. (This might be going over ground we already covered, but just wonder how you feel on it having started the separate packaging?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020017.n820HPLs015128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #21 from D Haley 2009-09-01 20:17:22 EDT --- >the failures in the tests are due to bad coding in the tests themselves, I still haven't had time to look at this. As long as you are convinced that it is a test failure, and not a failure in the main code, I am happy for it to be disabled with a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020051.n820pYwG022123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #10 from Brett Lentz 2009-09-01 20:51:33 EDT --- Ok. I'll change the %defines to %global before the first build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020051.n820plKH022162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Brett Lentz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Brett Lentz 2009-09-01 20:51:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-pathname2 Short Description: An alternate implementation for the Pathname library Owners: wakko666 Branches: F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 02:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020249.n822nar2011017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 03:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 23:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020346.n823kLjX021277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-01 23:46:20 EDT --- build done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 04:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020409.n8249Svt025139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 04:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020409.n8249FrQ006458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 04:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520741] New: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520741 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cns11643.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cns11643-1.2.0.20090902-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CNS11643 table for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020639.n826dAsf017893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-02 02:39:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647316 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cf15e45f8018e929848f0b95b7e1a70acc80cb74 MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=89, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.76 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.85 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable-0.08-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MooseX::Traits::Pluggable) = 0.08 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util) perl(namespace::autoclean) perl(Scalar::Util) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020638.n826cuET002412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-02 02:38:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1647297 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9a2f8d71777f06b846da61988398d75153846bbd Moose-Autobox-0.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=156, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.02 sys + 4.68 cusr 0.18 csys = 4.98 CPU) + Package perl-Moose-Autobox-0.09-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Moose::Autobox) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::ARRAY) perl(Moose::Autobox::Array) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::CODE) perl(Moose::Autobox::Code) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Defined) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::HASH) perl(Moose::Autobox::Hash) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Indexed) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Item) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::List) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Number) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Ref) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::SCALAR) perl(Moose::Autobox::Scalar) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::String) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Undef) = 0.09 perl(Moose::Autobox::Value) = 0.09 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(metaclass) perl(Moose::Autobox) perl(Moose::Autobox::Array) perl(Moose::Autobox::Code) perl(Moose::Autobox::Hash) perl(Moose::Autobox::Scalar) perl(Moose::Autobox::Undef) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util) perl(Perl6::Junction) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020643.n826h4f1018641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-02 02:43:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1649241 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ab4111ee9a6058b5afecd43e2e3969556db742a7 CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBIC::Schema) = 0.2 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020648.n826m7Yk004068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-02 02:48:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Moose-Autobox Short Description: Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020648.n826mOQO004121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020648.n826m9x0004090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 06:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020648.n826mMnU019656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-02 02:48:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable Short Description: A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 07:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 03:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020758.n827wA3f021496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #21 from Patrice FERLET 2009-09-02 03:58:07 EDT --- Package has some compilation troubles, but I know how to correct. I think it will be readdy this week :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021028.n82ASRWh019132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021028.n82ASQON019100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |501576 --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-09-02 06:28:24 EDT --- python-repoze-what-quickstart is required to build this package, adding to dependency. Can somebody look at dependency tree and ask for release? Looks like all are approved, just need to be commited to stable updates. Why this "needinfo from nobody" is good for? Luke, can you add this release of TurboGears2 into your tg2 repository? I can't build TurboGears2 on my system now and build in mock does not work due to packages, which have been not released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 10:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 06:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021052.n82AqOmv024813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #4 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-09-02 06:52:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > REVIEW:: > > > user1# rpmlint sblim-gather.spec > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricNetworkPort.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczCH.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryProcessor.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryUnixProcess.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzCH.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryLocalFileSystem.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzLPAR.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryOperatingSystem.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczLPAR.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricXen.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricLocalFileSystem.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricIPProtocolEndpoint.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczECKD.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryIPProtocolEndpoint.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricUnixProcess.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricOperatingSystem.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryNetworkPort.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricProcessor.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczCEC.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzECKD.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzCEC.so > sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryXen.so I suggest to ignore this warning, these files are not supposed to be in -devel package. > > > user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-provider-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: no-documentation > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzLPAR.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugUnixProcess.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricForMEProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugIPProtocolEndpoint.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricDefinitionProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzCEC.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricValueProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugOperatingSystem.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricGathererProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzECKD.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricInstanceProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricRepositoryServiceProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugLocalFileSystem.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzCH.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugNetworkPort.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugXen.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugProcessor.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricIndicationProvider.so > sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricDefForMEProvider.so > Again, this is intention. > > user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-devel-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm > sblim-gather-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > > user1# sblim-gather-test-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm > sblim-gather-test.i386: W: no-documentation > > > **Please add comments about the patches if you can. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 11:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021128.n82BSb27013156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Joel Andres Granados changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from Joel Andres Granados 2009-09-02 07:28:34 EDT --- agreed. moc definitely belongs in rpmfusion due to deps. I'm closing this for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 11:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021128.n82BSdap013197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 502870, which changed state. Bug 502870 Summary: Update dia to 0.97 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502870 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 496433 depends on bug 490210, which changed state. Bug 490210 Summary: Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 11:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 07:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021153.n82BrHPs011594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #18 from Denys Vlasenko 2009-09-02 07:53:14 EDT --- fc11 build is done too (identical to fc12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 13:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021330.n82DUL4l022906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Karel Voln? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Karel Voln? 2009-09-02 09:30:19 EDT --- closing, succesfully built for F-12/rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130114 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130111 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 13:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021358.n82Dw7KZ030066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 13:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 09:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] New: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Simple Logging Facade for Java or (SLF4J) is intended to serve as a simple facade for various logging APIs allowing to the end-user to plug in the desired implementation at deployment time. SLF4J also allows for a gradual migration path away from Jakarta Commons Logging (JCL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 14:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021403.n82E3AhN019072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #21 from Petr Rockai 2009-09-02 10:03:08 EDT --- Hi David, sorry for taking this long. I am sure I drafted a reply to this bug and lost it somewhere a few months (I guess) back. As for maintaining the package: I am a little too busy to work on this right now. I can offer you co-maintainership to a limited extent, however I am not very fluent with .spec files (it's a few years since I have done any rpm packaging work). I can probably do more on the upstream level, improving the source tarball to meet your packaging needs. As for administrative issues with divine-mc source tarball, I still haven't gotten around to making a 1.4.1 -- I have the CMakeLists and packjars changes ready in the 2.0 branch, so it'll be a matter of straightforward backport. Thanks, Petr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 14:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021409.n82E9GQr000834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021516.n82FGpvs006517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #20 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-02 11:16:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Looks good so far, but the autotools issues from comment #15 remain. Ralf, you > mind helping out with a patch? I don't understand - which of the issues from comment #15 are you referring to? Some of them are related to bugs in gnome-autogen.sh, others are related to the original source code abusing the autotools (the pattern-rules), other issues are releated Mr. Robinson using an incorrectly packaged tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021523.n82FNjNi008117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #24 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-02 11:23:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > [upstream is clueless] OK, upstream's answer doesn't actually surprize me ;-) > If anyone has any idea to deal with the situation, you are welcome :) I would introduce an SONAME of libnewmat.so.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021525.n82FPeEs021246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #25 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-02 11:25:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359548) Patch against newmat.spec This patch is one approach to implement what I wrote in previous comment. SONAME libnewmat.so.0, file name libnewmat.so.0.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021539.n82FdPQH011716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 11:39:24 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021539.n82FdJKV011677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 11:39:18 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dzen2-0.8.5-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] New: Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Summary: Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: XiaShing at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://202.60.89.117/fedora/SPECS/quotatool.spec SRPM URL: http://202.60.89.117/fedora/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Quotatool is a utility to set filesystem quotas from the commandline. It suitable for use in scripts and other non-interactive situations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021539.n82FdUBP024213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 11:39:30 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021541.n82FfiTD012824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2009-09-02 11:41:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > It looks like you mixed up "Short Description" and "InitialCC". I've made the > assumption that you wanted InitialCC to be empty. Yes, thank you and everyone else who helped here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 15:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 11:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021551.n82FpRrV015291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-02 11:51:25 EDT --- - package builds and installs fine on x86 X please make the description for the javadoc package "API documentation for %{name}" X many of the lines are > 80 characters; please fix X I think we need some Requires on java and jpackage-utils - licensing good (some files are missing license headers but I'm willing to accept [1]. we should perhaps press to get these added in git master) - rpmlint clean (except ignorable maven thing): $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm slf4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/slf4j 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-javadoc-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-manual-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - macros and clean sections present and fine - sources match upstream (md5sum) X please move to (-,root,root,-) for the %files %defattrs [1] http://marc.info/?l=slf4j-user&m=119773193423413&w=2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 16:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021621.n82GLt6C002145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-02 12:21:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtnc Short Description: Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification Owners: spot Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 17:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021713.n82HDL88012427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 13:13:20 EDT --- libtnc-1.22-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtnc-1.22-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 17:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021713.n82HDG8n012392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 13:13:15 EDT --- libtnc-1.22-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtnc-1.22-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 17:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021720.n82HKroL003364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Michal Schmidt 2009-09-02 13:20:50 EDT --- Lorenzo, the bug "ZYpp stack and RPM 4.6.0" https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444211 is CLOSED FIXED. Is there something else blocking this review now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 17:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021740.n82HeSXj007177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-02 13:40:27 EDT --- This seems to be your first package submission to Fedora. Thus, you need a sponsor reviewing this package (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored) I'm not a sponsor, so consider the following comments as informal. There are some issues in the spec file that should be fixed: - According to the source files GPLv2 is OK. However, the project homepage doesn't mention a GPL version number but links to GPLv3. Maybe you should ask upstream to fix this ambiguity - add a short comment above %Patch0 about what the patch does - I'd suggest to use the description text from the project website because it's a bit more detailed. - remove -n quotatool-%{version} from %setup, as it's not necessary - Patch0 is not applied because of the wrong parameter -p1 (remove -p1 from %patch0) - remove INSTALL from %doc (it's not of much use in a binary package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 18:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021840.n82Iemko030217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-02 14:40:47 EDT --- Some notes: * Version - It seems that the latest version is 0.7.2. * License - As http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ says libstdc++ documents are under GFDL, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GFDL". * About BR and its releated comments --------------------------------------------------------- # mm-common uses curl or wget to download the most recent libstdc++.tag. --------------------------------------------------------- - ... but during build process nothing is to be downloaded. ( and koji (Fedora buildsystem) does not allow to download anything during rpmbuild ) Would you clarify what you mention here? - By the way does this package need rebuild every time the (libstdc++) upstream doctags/libstdc++.tag is updated? ( Again on koji, no net connection is supported during rpmbuild process ) - Would you check if autoconf/automake is really needed for BuildRequires? They don't seem to be needed. * Macros - Please use macros properly. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros ! Note - For consistency I would suggest that "Requires: libxslt" should be used instead of "Requires: %{_bindir}/xsltproc", however I guess you want to suppress rpmlint "error" about explicit-lib-dependency. So if you want to use "Requires: %{_bindir}/xsltproc", I won't object to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] New: Review Request: fastback - support file uploader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fastback - support file uploader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Summary: Review Request: fastback - support file uploader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gavin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/fastback.spec SRPM URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/fastback-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fastback is a command line tool to upload files to a ticketing system, or other configurable URL (FTP,SCP,...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021906.n82J6tpo003656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-02 15:06:55 EDT --- rpmlint output: $ rpmlint fastback.spec SRPMS/fastback-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/fastback-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021907.n82J7588003697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-02 15:07:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - package builds and installs fine on x86 > X please make the description for the javadoc package "API documentation for > %{name}" Done. > X many of the lines are > 80 characters; please fix Done wherever possible > X I think we need some Requires on java and jpackage-utils Done > - licensing good (some files are missing license headers but I'm willing to > accept [1]. we should perhaps press to get these added in git master) > - rpmlint clean (except ignorable maven thing): > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > slf4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/slf4j > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-javadoc-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-manual-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > - macros and clean sections present and fine > - sources match upstream (md5sum) > X please move to (-,root,root,-) for the %files %defattrs Done > > [1] > http://marc.info/?l=slf4j-user&m=119773193423413&w=2 New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j-1.5.8-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021906.n82J6lsI025316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-02 15:06:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - package builds and installs fine on x86 > X please make the description for the javadoc package "API documentation for > %{name}" Done. > X many of the lines are > 80 characters; please fix Done wherever possible > X I think we need some Requires on java and jpackage-utils Done > - licensing good (some files are missing license headers but I'm willing to > accept [1]. we should perhaps press to get these added in git master) > - rpmlint clean (except ignorable maven thing): > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > slf4j.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/slf4j > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-javadoc-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/slf4j-manual-1.5.8-2.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > - macros and clean sections present and fine > - sources match upstream (md5sum) > X please move to (-,root,root,-) for the %files %defattrs Done > > [1] > http://marc.info/?l=slf4j-user&m=119773193423413&w=2 New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j-1.5.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021916.n82JG9Dq005793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-02 15:16:08 EDT --- Thanks. There are still some lines that could be shortened (104-108, 115-118, 120, 167. Otherwise, we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021916.n82JG9Fj027748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-02 15:16:06 EDT --- The package requires libmad which is not part of the Fedora because of patent reasons. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_doesn.27t_Fedora_include_support_for_proprietary_formats_like_MP3_or_MPEG.3F Thus, deadbeef couldn't be added to Fedora either. However, libmad is available through rpmfusion.org and you can probably get your package added to their repositories. Concerning BuildRequires/Requires, you can find more information about finding the necessary dependencies here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines This page is also a good introduction to other formal requirements for Fedora packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021922.n82JMGpv029035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #11 from Christof Damian 2009-09-02 15:22:15 EDT --- Another small change: I added a README.fedora file detailing the changes to the upstream tgz distribution. Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.8-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021927.n82JRJbQ008596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-02 15:27:18 EDT --- there is a 404 on the src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021933.n82JXYfI010235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-02 15:33:33 EDT --- Martin, thanks for your prompt reply on this issue. In fact you were faster with your reply than me with reviewing. Regarding your hint I assume it is not necessary anymore to review this and I can close this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021939.n82Jd0ri000733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-02 15:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks. There are still some lines that could be shortened (104-108, 115-118, > 120, 167. Otherwise, we're good to go. Done New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/slf4j-1.5.8-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021943.n82JhJiR004020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-02 15:43:18 EDT --- 104-112 could still be shortened but now we're just getting silly :) Fix if you'd like once it's in CVS. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 19:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909021957.n82Jv0hu021669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #2 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-02 15:56:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * Version > - It seems that the latest version is 0.7.2. > Yes, it was released today. Packaged it. > * License > - As http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ says libstdc++ documents > are under GFDL, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GFDL". > Done. > * About BR and its releated comments > --------------------------------------------------------- > # mm-common uses curl or wget to download the most recent libstdc++.tag. > --------------------------------------------------------- > - ... but during build process nothing is to be downloaded. > ( and koji (Fedora buildsystem) does not allow to download anything > during rpmbuild ) > Would you clarify what you mention here? > > - By the way does this package need rebuild every time the (libstdc++) > upstream doctags/libstdc++.tag is updated? > ( Again on koji, no net connection is supported during rpmbuild > process ) > > - Would you check if autoconf/automake is really needed for > BuildRequires? They don't seem to be needed. > Ok, here I messed completely (sort of compiling source from git vs. compiling source from tarball). So all BR are gone now, since none are needed. libstdc++.tag is downloaded when building from git (or in maintainer mode), so this tag file is already present in tarball. I'd leave keeping tag file updated task to upstream. > * Macros > - Please use macros properly. /usr/bin should be %{_bindir}. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros > > ! Note > - For consistency I would suggest that "Requires: libxslt" should be > used instead of "Requires: %{_bindir}/xsltproc", however I guess > you want to suppress rpmlint "error" about explicit-lib-dependency. > So if you want to use "Requires: %{_bindir}/xsltproc", I won't > object to it. Since rpmlint's error about explicit-lib-dependency is not important in this case, I changed it to libxslt. New paths: SPEC: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common.spec SRPM: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common-0.7.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022012.n82KCXcx025796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-02 16:12:31 EDT --- Some notes: * Versioning - Well, I cannot understand why your spec file has excessively large release number and I don't think this large release number is needed. If this release number comes from some reasons unrelated to Fedora, please reset this. - Also, please consider to use %{?_dist} tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * Licensing - The license tag should simply be "GPLv2+". src/Extensions.cpp is under GPLv2+, libferrisloki.so uses .libs/Extensions.o, which renders libferrisloki.so to be under GPLv2+, so other license tag is useless. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 192 libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include -I./../include/FerrisLoki -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT Extensions.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Extensions.Tpo -c Extensions.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Extensions.o 213 libtool: link: g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1/crtbeginS.o .libs/Extensions.o .libs/OrderedStatic.o .libs/SafeFormat.o .libs/Singleton.o .libs/SmallObj.o .libs/SmartPtr.o .libs/StrongPtr.o -lsigc-2.0 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../.. -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1/crtendS.o /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.4.1/../../../crtn.o -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-soname -Wl,libferrisloki.so.3 -o .libs/libferrisloki.so.3.0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- * BuildRoot - BuildRoot currently used in your spec file is not valid on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag ! Note On currently supported Fedora version (Fedora 10/11/12), you can simply BuildRoot line completely. * URL - Perhaps http://witme.sourceforge.net/ is better? * BuildRequires - BR: gcc-c++ is redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * About %build - From build.log: ------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 + ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-sigcxx-2x=yes 45 configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-sigcxx-2x ------------------------------------------------------------------- is "--with-sigcxx-2x" needed? - tarball contains include/FerrisLoki/loki/, i.e. this package uses internal copy of loki, however on Fedora loki is already packaged: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/loki-lib http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4740 This package (ferrisloki) should be patched to use system-wide loki-lib and include/FerrisLoki/loki/ should be removed at %prep. * %files - Fedora strongly suggests not to include static archives (.a files) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries - The directory %{_includedir}/FerrisLoki itself is not owned by any packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Forgetting_to_Include_a_Toplevel_Directory * pkgconfig file - ferrisloki.pc says (on i686, rawhide): --------------------------------------------------- 6 Name: ferrisloki 7 Description: Version of standard loki library with extensions. 8 Version: 3.0.2 9 Requires: 10 Libs: -L${libdir} -lferrisloki -lsigc-2.0 11 Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/FerrisLoki -I${includedir}/FerrisLoki/loki -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include --------------------------------------------------- This should be changed to: --------------------------------------------------- Name: ferrisloki Description: Version of standard loki library with extensions. Version: 3.0.2 Requires: sigc++-2.0 Libs: -L${libdir} -lferrisloki Cflags: -I${includedir}/FerrisLoki -I${includedir}/FerrisLoki/loki --------------------------------------------------- * Requires (for -devel subpackage) - For example FerrisLoki/BoostExtensions.hh contains: --------------------------------------------------- 53 #include 54 #include 55 #include --------------------------------------------------- This package means that ferrisloki-devel should have "Requires: boost-devel". * Requires between subpackages - Usually the dependency between packages rebuilt from the same srpm should have exact EVR (Epoch-Version-Release). i.e. ferrislock-devel should have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}", not just "Requires: %{name} >= %{version}": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022030.n82KUQYK016988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-02 16:30:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slf4j Short Description: Simple Logging Facade for Java Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022054.n82KsdUS022872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 16:54:38 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dzen2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022055.n82KtwuS004798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 16:55:56 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022054.n82KsjpO004048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 16:54:43 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022054.n82KsoXr004095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.0-2.fc11 |1.5.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022055.n82KtV32004681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 16:55:30 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022055.n82KtaaO004721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.0-2.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 20:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022056.n82Ku3mE023582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 21:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] New: Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 Summary: Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mschmidt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/ath_info/ath_info.spec SRPM URL: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/ath_info/ath_info-0-0.1.20090902svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: ath_info prints some version information of Atheros WLAN modules. It furthermore allows to change regulatory domain and PCI ID fields in the EEPROM. Since the output of lspci and dmesg is not always sufficient to correctly identify chipset versions, it is useful to attach ath_info output to bug reports for the ath5k driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 21:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022129.n82LT4k0012669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 --- Comment #1 from Michal Schmidt 2009-09-02 17:29:03 EDT --- Scratch Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1651155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 22:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022217.n82MH7s2008566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 18:17:06 EDT --- I have sponsored Thomas, removing blocker on bug 177841. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 22:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022239.n82Md0wq028170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 18:38:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Another way to resolve the conflicts that i think is to use alternatives to let > the user switch between the notification-daemon and notify-osd, chnaging only > the file /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.freedesktop.Notifications.service . I don't think alternatives will help here. We need to find a solution for bug # 484945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 22:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022256.n82Mukl8016175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-02 18:56:45 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 23:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022321.n82NLm7V020965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-02 19:21:47 EDT --- Hello, yes! Not forgotten, rest assured. Been a bit busy with other things. Full review in a couple of hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 23:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022344.n82NiFef006984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 19:44:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > I don't understand - which of the issues from comment #15 are you referring to? The one first one "using wrong autotools". IIRC your approach to avoid running autotools during build is to run them manually and create a patch from that. If we created a patch, would we also be able to fix this error while we are at it? > other issues > are releated Mr. Robinson using an incorrectly packaged tarball. This sounds like you are blaming Peter for the tarball, not upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 23:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022346.n82NknFI025061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 19:46:48 EDT --- Let me put it differently: (In reply to comment #15) > * Using wrong autotools: > ... > /usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh > [[1mchecking for autoconf >= 2.53... > [(B[[m testing autoconf2.50... not found. > testing autoconf... /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken > pipe > found 2.63 I've seen this error in a couple of packages without any notable loss of function or other bugs. Do you consider this a problem for the app itself of only for the build process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 23:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 19:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909022359.n82Nxvo1027007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 19:59:56 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030000.n83001i2009788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:00:01 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030028.n830SRZW015144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:28:26 EDT --- beacon-0.5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030028.n830SWUR015199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030029.n830TeM9032131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:29:39 EDT --- python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030030.n830U00d032179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Thomas Spura 2009-09-02 20:29:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gbirthday Short Description: Birthday reminder for evolution Owners: tomspur Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 OLPC-3 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030032.n830WYoE016774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:32:33 EDT --- beacon-0.5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830XQdN016916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:33:25 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830XF2x016869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 |3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830Xcud016981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:33:37 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030029.n830Twud015607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:29:57 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030030.n830U2c7015932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0-2.el5 |1.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030029.n830Tj7d015556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030030.n830UFc7016114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.92-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030030.n830UAbY015979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Bug 510943 depends on bug 513636, which changed state. Bug 513636 Summary: Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:30:09 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030034.n830YwFL001394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:34:57 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030034.n830YUTa001260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:34:29 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030032.n830WdOe000788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5-3.fc10 |0.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830X9Ww000891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:33:08 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830XVsh000952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 |3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830XhTp001029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0-2.fc11 |1.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030034.n830YauM001297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030033.n830Xopc001072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:33:49 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dzen2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030030.n830UwWi032747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:30:56 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dzen2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9241 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030035.n830ZA7w017940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-02 20:35:10 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030035.n830Z3WO017915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.92-3.fc10 |4.92-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030035.n830ZGM7018054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 |0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 00:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 20:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030044.n830iD3S019237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 20:44:12 EDT --- No OLPC-3 branch please as we are using stock Fedora packages on the XO now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 01:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030126.n831QNcf014575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Spura 2009-09-02 21:26:22 EDT --- Ok, sorry. F-10 is also not that needed... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gbirthday Short Description: Birthday reminder for evolution Owners: tomspur Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 01:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030134.n831Yqca029257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #2 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-02 21:34:51 EDT --- - The website links to the latest GPL page, where the GNU is free to make changes to it at any time. But it was released with GPLv2 which is why I went with that. - Comment added above %Patch0 - I took snippets from the website to keep it brief - Removed some stuff from %setup - Removed -p1 as well - Removed INSTALL from %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 01:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030136.n831ariL016502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-02 21:36:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Ok, sorry. F-10 is also not that needed... Why not? I think people on F-10 will like it. On the other hand you don't need to specify F-12 explicitly because currently F-12 == devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 01:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 21:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030159.n831xXEU000824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Spura 2009-09-02 21:59:32 EDT --- Since last friday branch requests for F-12 can be done (fedora-devel-list). devel will then be F-13. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gbirthday Short Description: Birthday reminder for evolution Owners: tomspur Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 03:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030316.n833GjoR017008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 03:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030349.n833n6P3025154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #8 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-09-02 23:49:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-do-docklets Short Description: Docklets for GNOME-Do Owners: nushio salimma Branches: F-12 F-11 devel InitialCC: gnome-do-owner at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 04:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030401.n83413bc014371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #5 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-09-03 00:01:02 EDT --- Builds for Fedora 11 too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1651513 My only comments are that the patches aren't commented or reported upstream: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Other than that, It's good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 04:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030418.n834Ixne031576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-03 00:18:57 EDT --- APPROVED Everything looks fine. Note the licensing question mark below, though. Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1651516 MUST OK rpmlint OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines OK license field accurate: assuming the + in GPLv2+ from other similar packages perhaps nag upstream to put license header in the source file, per GPL requirement (phew! I'm definitely starting to prefer the GPL-compatible CeCILL for my own work) OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English OK spec legible OK source matches upstream OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded (Koji) OK build dependencies complete OK locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale OK own all directories OK no dupes in %files OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FIXME if license text missing, ask upstream to include it license text not missing, but license header is OK package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described will take your word on it; setting it loose on a multi-gigabyte movie/music library is not recommended! OK require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030513.n835DVg7008601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-03 01:13:30 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/wb_builder.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/wb_builder-1.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030514.n835E6ET008712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #21 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-03 01:14:05 EDT --- Dean ? Are you there ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030522.n835M9WP010203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030521.n835LvRn010161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-03 01:21:56 EDT --- please fix summary and do a scratch build in koji for f-10/11 i will meantime review deeply this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030526.n835Qcx6029668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Jurijs Kolomijecs changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jurijs Kolomijecs 2009-09-03 01:26:37 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing package. Looks like yes, you may close this issue. Have a luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030539.n835dXk6013250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-03 01:39:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Regarding your hint I assume it is not > necessary anymore to review this and I can close this issue? Yes, I think so too. Maybe it could be possible to remove the MP3 support but then the player wouldn't be of much use. It's probably better to go with rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030547.n835lte3001308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #28 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-03 01:47:54 EDT --- Hi Chris, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 05:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 01:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030551.n835pNa4002106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk --- Comment #5 from Paul F. Johnson 2009-09-03 01:51:22 EDT --- xmms doesn't ship with mp3 support and that's been a long time staple... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 06:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030624.n836OV15009208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-03 02:24:30 EDT --- New Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1651585 Updated spec is at the same location, with comments for the following: - pkgconfig patch already in trunk - nunit patch no longer necessary, with the fixed -nunit subpackage of F-12's mono (hurrah!) To test this on F-11, you'd probably have to rebuild Mono yourself. I'll ping Toshio to check if we can start updating Mono packages in F-11 again. 98 out of 921 unit tests currently fail, so while I've added a %check section, the 'make test' invocation is currently commented out. Will check with upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 06:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030626.n836Q0WS022328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-03 02:25:59 EDT --- Juan, please assign the review to yourself, and set the fedora-review flag to '?' during review and '+' when you declare the package approved. Otherwise it might delay the package getting imported to CVS. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 06:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030644.n836icH2013062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nushio at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 06:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 02:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030659.n836xpLp028623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-03 02:59:49 EDT --- I had a quick look at your package and noticed the following things that should be fixed. I'm not a sponsor, though. - according to the source files the license tag should be GPLv3+ - you can remove the following redundant dependencies: BuildRequires: glib2-devel BuildRequires: pango-devel BuildRequires: gtk2-devel - since the package ships with a GUI application, you must include a .desktop file (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files) - the sample files should go in a -doc subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 08:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030800.n8380kPw030066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 07:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 03:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030759.n837xj1g008951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-03 03:59:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - The website links to the latest GPL page, where the GNU is free to make > changes to it at any time. Yes, that's the point I tried to make. You should inform upstream that source files and website are out of sync concerning the license. This should be fixed. It doesn't affect the package though, as the sources indicate GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 08:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030808.n83882Rj032267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #4 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-03 04:08:01 EDT --- Oh, so I tell upstream so that they know about it for other packages as well? How do I notify them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 08:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030815.n838FjNS001966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-03 04:15:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) AFAICT, this is a bug in gnome-autogen.sh. Another one (unrelated to this package) is this: ... checking for autoconf >= 2.53... testing autoconf2.50... not found. testing autoconf... found 2.63 ... (In reply to comment #21) > > other issues > > are releated Mr. Robinson using an incorrectly packaged tarball. > > This sounds like you are blaming Peter for the tarball, not upstream. It's partially upstream's mistake, it's partially Mr. Robinson's mistake. Upstream ships an incomplete tarball. Mr. Robinson refuses to use this tarball in compliance to the autotools' working principles. Or differently: If Mr. Robinson was using a "make dist" generated tarball or was running the autotools in advance to building and was applying patches, all the issues we currently are discussing would not be around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 08:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 04:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030851.n838pnjC021952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-03 04:51:47 EDT --- Simply write an email to the author of quotatool and inform him about the issue. You can also add a link to this review request. The email address is given on the website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 09:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030912.n839CjZm014003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-09-03 05:12:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) - Added sentence about CA certs to INSTALL.Fedora - /etc/voms now owned by root - /etc/grid-security-voms now owned by root - /etc/vomses added - installed by main package - Fixed man page references in /usr/share/voms/voms_install_db -h output (In reply to comment #6) The init script has been fixed: [root at ellert ~]# service voms start Starting voms(mytestvo): [ OK ] Starting voms(mytestvo2): [ OK ] [root at ellert ~]# service voms start Starting voms(mytestvo): VOMS (25049) is already running Starting voms(mytestvo2): VOMS (25065) is already running [root at ellert ~]# service voms stop Stopping voms(mytestvo): [ OK ] Stopping voms(mytestvo2): [ OK ] [root at ellert ~]# service voms stop Stopping voms(mytestvo): (already stopped) Stopping voms(mytestvo2): (already stopped) [root at ellert ~]# service voms restart Stopping voms(mytestvo): (already stopped) Stopping voms(mytestvo2): (already stopped) Starting voms(mytestvo): [ OK ] Starting voms(mytestvo2): [ OK ] [root at ellert ~]# service voms stop mytestvo Stopping voms(mytestvo): [ OK ] [root at ellert ~]# service voms condrestart Stopping voms(mytestvo2): [ OK ] Starting voms(mytestvo2): [ OK ] [root at ellert ~]# service voms status Status voms(mytestvo): stopped Status voms(mytestvo2): (pid 25382 25384) is running... New version is here: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-1.9.11-3.fc11.src.rpm Mattias. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 09:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030917.n839HcBb027208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 05:17:35 EDT --- > Or differently: If Mr. Robinson was using a "make dist" generated tarball or > was running the autotools in advance to building and was applying patches, all > the issues we currently are discussing would not be around. Mr Robinson would gladly use a make dist tarball if they were distributed by upstream :) Believe me it would make my life so much easier! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 09:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030926.n839QCVF017034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 05:26:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-media Short Description: Moblin Panel for Media Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 09:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030935.n839ZctQ031587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #25 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-03 05:35:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > > Or differently: If Mr. Robinson was using a "make dist" generated tarball or > > was running the autotools in advance to building and was applying patches, all > > the issues we currently are discussing would not be around. > > Mr Robinson would gladly use a make dist tarball if they were distributed by > upstream :) Believe me it would make my life so much easier! And why don't _you_ do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 09:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 05:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030935.n839Z9Tl031397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-03 05:35:08 EDT --- Strange, I never received any mail from this bug. Thanks for the review, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema Short Description: Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 10:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 06:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031028.n83AS2Mc009833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura 2009-09-03 06:27:43 EDT --- Using F-12 branch is indeed nonsence^^ Well... Learning by doing :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gbirthday Short Description: Birthday reminder for evolution Owners: tomspur Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 10:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 06:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031038.n83AclaJ012091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #63 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-03 06:38:13 EDT --- Sorry for delay. As rebuild is requirement to ensure of all binaries born from longtime sources, I done this. And now, I think it good idea also include it. I pack it in subpackage. (In reply to comment #56) > Yes, I've also read this thread. However, it is for sure not wrong to use a > standard tab width. And you would do nearly all other packagers the favor that > they could easily read your spec file with a proper formatting. As you can read no single "all other packagers thing" about it question. > The alternative would be to use just spaces. This would work for everyone and > since there is usually not that many changes in a spec file, it should not have > that much overhead. Would you agree on this solution? No. Spaces off course always was second solution there, but (IMHO off course) add only mesh. The main reason of it - easy distinguish leaved space in formatting. But, you may wish do it. I think you favorite editor can do it. If not, I wrote little script for that on PHP: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/tab-convert.phps Yo may use it like: $ cat x11vnc.spec | ./tab-convert.php > x11vnc.spec.spaces Or, with power of UNIX-WAY, off course directly in shell f.e: $ cat x11vnc.spec | php -r 'define("TAB_WIDTH", 5);foreach(file("php://stdin") as $l){preg_match_all("/\t+/", $l, $m, PREG_OFFSET_CAPTURE);foreach($m[0] as $mm){$l = str_replace($mm[0],str_repeat(" ", (TAB_WIDTH - ($mm[1] % TAB_WIDTH)) + ( TAB_WIDTH * ( strlen($mm[0]) - 1 ) )), $l);}echo $l;}' > x11vnc.spec.spaces > I think basic indentation is a well-accepted coding standard for nearly all > languages. Especially the inner blocks of constructs like "if () then ... else > ..." or "for" loops should be indented one step more than the surrounding code. May be you will surprised, but even in one language different projects has own "coding standards". > Here are the missing minor pieces: > > 1. tab width: it would really be nice if you could use either a tab width of 8 > or just convert the spec file to spaces I provide script and command before - with it you can easy convert tabs to spaces if you wish see it. > 2. According to Tom it is not necessary to re-package the tarball. However, he > suggests that the pre-built binaries are deleted in the %prep section. My > suggestion: > - add "find -name '*.jar' -exec rm {} \;" to the end of the %prep section > - add the attached patch to prevent that "make" will enter the "classes" > directory I add string to remove all prebuilt jars and built it again. So, I think there no more to discuss. > 3. Please make sure that the comments in the spec file and the %changelog > entries don't exceed 80 chars per line. Sure, that's also not strictly required > but nearly all spec files do it this way. ;-) As I remember rpmlint fire warning at one time if string exceeded 79 characters in description. But our days it is not (I especially check). And additionally I have for example Source0 string which is greater. So, it is not impossible in common case. Meantime I truncate some very long lines especially for you. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-11.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] New: Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Summary: Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/kxml.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/kxml-2.2.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: kXML is a small XML pull parser, specially designed for constrained environments such as Applets, Personal Java or MIDP devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031229.n83CTcw0022227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031234.n83CYVkp005031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031239.n83CdinA006116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031242.n83Cg8pl006752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #22 from Dean Glazeski 2009-09-03 08:42:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Dean ? Are you there ? Yeah, I'm still here. I've got the package uploaded, tagged, and built for devel, F-10, and F-11. I've been swamped recently so I keep forgetting to submit the new package in Bodhi. I went ahead and took care of this this morning. See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openocd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:39:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] New: Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Summary: Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OSGi Service Platform Release 4 Core Interfaces and Classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] New: Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Summary: Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OSGi OBR Service API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031250.n83Cofra008420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031250.n83CodsA008374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486360 Depends on| |521067 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 12:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031259.n83CxE0q028401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 08:59:13 EDT --- X let's remove "specially designed for constrained environments" from Summary X lines 78, 82, and 83 are too long X let's make the description for javadoc say "API documentation for %{name}" X the pom is slightly different (nothing of consequence) than the one I download; can you re-download that source? - md5sum of source0 okay - macros good - clean used appropriately - buildroot fine - naming and licensing fine - rpmlint output fine: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kxml-2.2.2-4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kxml-2.2.2-4.fc11.noarch.rpm kxml.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/kxml 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kxml-javadoc-2.2.2-4.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031310.n83DAp6a012798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 09:10:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X let's remove "specially designed for constrained environments" from Summary Done. > X lines 78, 82, and 83 are too long Done. > X let's make the description for javadoc say "API documentation for %{name}" Done. > X the pom is slightly different (nothing of consequence) than the one I > download; can you re-download that source? Done > > - md5sum of source0 okay > - macros good > - clean used appropriately > - buildroot fine > - naming and licensing fine > - rpmlint output fine: > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kxml-2.2.2-4.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kxml-2.2.2-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > kxml.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/kxml > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/kxml-javadoc-2.2.2-4.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/kxml.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/kxml-2.2.2-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031334.n83DY997018605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #18 from David A. Wheeler 2009-09-03 09:34:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: auto-destdir New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: dwheeler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031335.n83DZ42Q019026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031337.n83Db7uG019532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 09:37:06 EDT --- Only issue: line 40 is too long - md5sums and sha1sums match - licensing good - naming fine - rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-javadoc-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm felix-osgi-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-core 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. For those playing along at home, Alex and I discussed the possibility of using the Eclipse version of these OSGi classes. This would mean a tighter loop at a build level between Eclipse and Jetty. It also would mean porting work to bring Felix up to the different (newer) versions of these OSGi classes in Eclipse. At this time, it's probably easiest to have this separate, small implementation. Also, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks to split their monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't file conflicts. At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support JPackage compatibility, this is probably okay. Longer term, it'd be nice to interoperate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031338.n83DcsbL004648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-03 09:38:52 EDT --- Next add the bug number on bodhi while you are requesting a push. Bodhi will automatically close this package review. I'm closing it manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031348.n83Dm0VH021957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 09:47:56 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031348.n83Dm59X007238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 09:48:04 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 13:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031349.n83DnruR022249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 09:49:52 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031403.n83E3BMX025578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 10:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only issue: line 40 is too long Fixed. > > - md5sums and sha1sums match > - licensing good > - naming fine > - rpmlint clean: > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-javadoc-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > felix-osgi-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-core > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > For those playing along at home, Alex and I discussed the possibility of using > the Eclipse version of these OSGi classes. This would mean a tighter loop at a > build level between Eclipse and Jetty. It also would mean porting work to > bring Felix up to the different (newer) versions of these OSGi classes in > Eclipse. At this time, it's probably easiest to have this separate, small > implementation. > > Also, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks to split their > monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't file conflicts. > At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support JPackage compatibility, > this is probably okay. Longer term, it'd be nice to interoperate. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031408.n83E88kX011776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2009-09-03 10:08:07 EDT --- rpmlint output: trac-accountmanager-plugin.src: W: strange-permission pull-from-svn.sh 0775 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings => harmless Review checklist: - package name OK and matches other trac plugins in distribution - spec file name OK - package meets guidelines - license OK and matches upstream - no detached license file - spec file written in English and is legible - no upstream tarball to compare sources with, but pull-from-svn script provided - package builds in mock for F-11 and Rawhide; package not appropriate for F-10 due to trac >= 11.0 requirement - buildreqs OK - no locale data, subpackages, libraries, devel files, or scriplets to worry about - package not intended to be relocatable - no duplicate files or directory ownership issues - %defattr and %clean present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - all filenames are ASCII - package functions as expected (see http://www.city-fan.org/tips/TracWithFastCGIonFedora for example setup) - no file dependencies No issues there then. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031423.n83EN4qa030808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 10:23:03 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031423.n83ENDX6030844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-03 10:23:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-accountmanager-plugin Short Description: Trac plugin for account registration and management Owners: mathstuf pghmcfc Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031420.n83EKxM1014945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 10:20:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kxml Short Description: kXML is a small XML pull parser Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031435.n83EZ1vL017865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 10:34:59 EDT --- Only issue: line 42 is too long :) - md5sums match upstream - licensing fine - builds and installs fine - macros sane - naming good - files okay - rpmlint clean (maven warning is okay): $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-javadoc-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm felix-osgi-obr.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-obr 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. As I said in bug #521067, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks to split their monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't file conflicts. At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support JPackage compatibility, this is probably okay. Longer term, it'd be nice to interoperate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031436.n83EaCsh001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 10:36:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: felix-osgi-core Short Description: Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 14:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 10:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031452.n83EqxSC021893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 10:52:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only issue: line 42 is too long :) Fixed. > > - md5sums match upstream > - licensing fine > - builds and installs fine > - macros sane > - naming good > - files okay > - rpmlint clean (maven warning is okay): > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-javadoc-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > felix-osgi-obr.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-obr > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > As I said in bug #521067, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks > to split their monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't > file conflicts. At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support > JPackage compatibility, this is probably okay. Longer term, it'd be nice to > interoperate. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031501.n83F1pSB008924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-03 11:01:50 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031504.n83F4K2t024270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031503.n83F3n2M024161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-03 11:03:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: felix-osgi-obr Short Description: Felix OSGi OBR Service API Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031510.n83FAB0D026079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-03 11:10:10 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031510.n83FAmuA011507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-03 11:10:47 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031511.n83FBDDt011587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-03 11:11:12 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031511.n83FBgLC011667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-03 11:11:40 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031510.n83FAp44026193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-03 11:10:50 EDT --- %if 0%{?rhel} %if 0%{?rhel} <= 5 BuildRequires: curl-devel %else BuildRequires: libcurl-devel %endif %else BuildRequires: libcurl-devel %endif This is needlessly complicated. Just use %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 5 BuildRequires: curl-devel %else BuildRequires: libcurl-devel %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 15:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031515.n83FFekk012728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rpm at greysector.ne | |t) --- Comment #4 from John W. Linville 2009-09-03 11:15:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 16:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031616.n83GGNFY029742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 12:16:22 EDT --- python-markdown2-1.0.1.13-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-markdown2-1.0.1.13-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 16:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031654.n83GsAjg004666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-03 12:54:09 EDT --- By the way on F-9/10/11/12 libcurl-devel has "Provides: curl-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 16:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909031658.n83GwbNW022452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-03 12:58:36 EDT --- Okay. - "Requires: perl" is redundant. This dependency is automatically detected by rpmbuild itself and is automatically added to binary rpm. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032009.n83K90R3013463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #4 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-03 16:08:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Yes, thank you. Will be fixed in next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032010.n83KAsfC014153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #5 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-03 16:10:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > By the way on F-9/10/11/12 libcurl-devel has "Provides: curl-devel". Yes, but that conditional and BuildRequires is for RHEL/EPEL 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032019.n83KJ8U4031845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-03 16:19:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032019.n83KJBh1031908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-03 16:19:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032056.n83KuAsp007242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 16:56:09 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 20:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 16:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032056.n83KuS84007369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 16:56:27 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 21:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032121.n83LL0cR028396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Jos? Matos 2009-09-03 17:20:58 EDT --- Hi Ionu?, I am a sponsor and I am ready to start the sponsorship process. :-) I'm sorry for taking so long, I saw this submission on Saturday, but I have been busy with real work. I will postpone the review of this package until next Saturday, but meanwhile in order to access your understanding of the packaging guidelines I suggest you to start reviewing other packages as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join You don't have yet the right to approve other packages, please say this explicitly in the reviews you choose. Don't worry I will follow those reviews and I will help if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 21:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521152] New: Review Request: mysql-workbench - MySQL gui tool for database modelling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-workbench - MySQL gui tool for database modelling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521152 Summary: Review Request: mysql-workbench - MySQL gui tool for database modelling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dennis at ausil.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-workbench.spec SRPM URL: http://ausil.us/packages/mysql-workbench-5.1.18-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: MySQL gui tool for database modelling scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1653377 this is targeted for F-12 only right now. there are some bugs in ctemplate in F-10 and F-11 that need fixing first -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 21:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032151.n83Lpvw3017776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 17:51:54 EDT --- There's a few issues that need to be addressed. - rpmlint output $ rpmlint pure-0.32-0.1.fc12.src.rpm pure.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint pure-0.32-0.1.fc12.x86_64.rpm pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpure.so pure.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libpure.so.3.0 pure.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libpure.so.3.0 pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pure/pure_main.c pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/pure/runtime.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines - specfile name matches the package base name why is the spec file named pure-svn.spec? + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license - latest version packaged There looks to be a 0.34 release upstream now + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible - upstream sources match sources in the srpm a svn release needs to document how to recreate the spec file. See the geoclue package for an example. + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1653406 + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* - binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files - Package perserves timestamps on install As per guiddelines you could use "make install DESTDIR=%$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p'" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package - header files should be in -devel Seems to be a few source files in the main package (plus an object file). n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' ? libfoo.so must go in -devel Not sure if this is relevant here. n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 22:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032204.n83M4lZU019984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ismael at olea.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ismael at olea.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 22:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032207.n83M7nUP020705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-03 18:07:48 EDT --- thanks, ismael. updated the spec at the same URL as before: now it doesn't set the stack executable on the libva.so.0 that's generated. that's the only change. will link to updated .src.rpm shortly. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 22:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032228.n83MSITn024201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-03 18:28:16 EDT --- An initial review. The summary and description still need to be fixed. Other than that there's only a couple of small bits. - rpmlint output rpmlint whaawmp-0.2.12.1-1.fc11.src.rpm whaawmp-0.2.12.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm whaawmp.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/whaawmp/whaawmp.py 0644 /usr/bin/env whaawmp.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/whaawmp/thumbnailer.py 0644 /usr/bin/env 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 259b61cfa87bbba54dcd9579a815a421 whaawmp-0.2.12.1.tar.bz2 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1653577 + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + Package perserves timestamps on install + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file - packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages I'm not sure why both packages need to own this? # We need to own this dir although it's already owned by Thunar %dir %{_datadir}/thumbnailers/ + %install must start with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 22:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 18:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032233.n83MXlot025122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-03 18:33:45 EDT --- Because that was an SVN snapshot that I accidentally uploaded to my review page. Here's the updated srpm: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.33-1.fc12.src.rpm - ppc builds disabled (Albert is investigating PPC issues, which has not been well-tested for a while) - works fine on Rawhide i686; on x86_64 some tests had to be disabled. on F-11, should work fine on x86_64 but tests will currently fail on i586 if built against the current LLVM. Test against the LLVM in updates-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032318.n83NIQUG016068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:18:25 EDT --- django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032318.n83NI1nB016001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-2.fc11 |0.6-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032317.n83NHveh032088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:17:56 EDT --- Django-south-0.6-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJ0W0032328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:19:00 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJIxY032397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.2-1.fc11 |0.2.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJ57F032362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el4 |0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032318.n83NIrhW032288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc11 |0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJeNh032504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:19:39 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJidB032533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-2.fc11 |0.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032318.n83NIVbj032164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc1 |0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.el5 |1 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032318.n83NInD9016165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:18:48 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 23:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909032319.n83NJEeV016234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 19:19:13 EDT --- django-piston-0.2.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 00:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] New: Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Summary: Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL-0.9.9-1.src.rpm Description: OpenGTL provides tools, languages and libraries to create generic transformations for graphics. These transformations can be used by different programs, e.g. Krita, Gimp, CinePaint, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 00:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040046.n840kHn8029823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-03 20:46:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL-0.9.9-2.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Sep 03 2009 Rex Dieter - 0.9.9-2 - generate doxygen docs - ExcludeArch: ppc64 (to match llvm) scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1653755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 00:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040054.n840s7r4014941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-03 20:54:03 EDT --- OK, the updated stuff, and submitted a new OpenGTL review, bug #521166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 00:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455500] Review Request: OpenGTL -- graphics transformation languages (used by krita2) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040054.n840sSLC030745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-03 20:54:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 521166 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 00:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040054.n840sTOV030765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mw_triad at users.sourceforge. | |net --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-03 20:54:27 EDT --- *** Bug 455500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 01:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040102.n8412AOT032147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-03 21:02:09 EDT --- checked for latest OpenGTL-0.9.10, but the build aborts with: llvm was build with asserts, this is not supported by OpenGTL. I'll have to find out the details here, and why llvm is built that way on fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040207.n8427Rc9026248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:07:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040213.n842DI53027352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:13:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040214.n842EWpe027518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:14:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040212.n842C6F9027152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:12:05 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers has some of the procedure. Was this package retired more than 3 months ago? It looks like it was, so it will need to be submitted like it was a new package and pass review again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040217.n842H7JJ011790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:17:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040218.n842IENj028439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:18:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040220.n842KMrs029035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:20:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040216.n842G3Ed028082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:16:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040222.n842MiRU012877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:22:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040219.n842J42d012054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:19:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040221.n842L6Hi029279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:21:05 EDT --- Did you mean perl-Math-Calc-Units here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040224.n842On1i029789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-03 22:24:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040229.n842TJLU030738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #15 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-03 22:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Did you mean perl-Math-Calc-Units here? Yes (perl-Math-Calc-Units is needed by perl-Nagios-Plugin). /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 02:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040249.n842n6nM017991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #11 from Eric Sandeen 2009-09-03 22:49:03 EDT --- Andreas, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040314.n843EEci022207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 23:14:13 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040315.n843Fg5r022710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 23:15:41 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520561] Review Request: perl-Moose-Autobox - Autoboxed wrappers for native Perl datatypes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040348.n843mEl7028440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520561 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-03 23:48:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520565] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable - A pluggable extension to MooseX::Traits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040348.n843mZfU028488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520565 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-03 23:48:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040352.n843qaOA029288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-03 23:52:35 EDT --- updated SRPM: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/video-experimental/rawhide/SRPMS/libva-0.30.4.1.sds5-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:59:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040359.n843xVmS013724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 23:59:30 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040359.n843xI0W013676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-03 23:59:16 EDT --- libtnc-1.22-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040401.n8441etH030991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:01:39 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040400.n8440c7j030779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:00:37 EDT --- libtnc-1.22-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040400.n8440hdN030813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.22-1.fc10 |1.22-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040401.n8441jUF031029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.10-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040359.n843xaP5030179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.22.1-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 03:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040359.n843xM9Q030136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.22-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040404.n8444e4r015037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.22.1-3.fc10 |1.22.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040405.n84459at015399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:05:08 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpptasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040404.n8444Znc031898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:04:35 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040407.n8447iqR000310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:07:43 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040404.n8444oCl031946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 00:04:49 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpptasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9278 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040407.n8447noK016070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc10 |1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040438.n844c8ul006281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-04 00:38:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers > has some of the procedure. This is the procedure I followed and that's why this bug is a New Package Review Request. > > Was this package retired more than 3 months ago? Yes. > It looks like it was, so it will need to be submitted like it was a new package > and pass review again. Andrew did the review step hence the fedora-review+. This is a new bug vs the original rgmanager request done years ago. Then according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process that points to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests at point 4 of the review process it seems natural to use "Package Change Requests for existing packages" since the bits already exists in fedora-cvs and it's a "special request" rather than a new package. Anyway.. new CVS request follow in the next comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040441.n844f5oQ006881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-04 00:41:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rgmanager Short Description: Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster Owners: fabbione lon Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 04:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 00:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040456.n844uWcA024608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from A S Alam 2009-09-04 00:56:31 EDT --- Build for Rawhide. Closing Bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] New: Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Summary: Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CatalystX-Component-Traits OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Adds a "COMPONENT" method to your Catalyst component base class that reads the optional 'traits' parameter from app and component config and instantiates the component subclass with those traits using MooseX::Traits/new_with_traits from MooseX::Traits::Pluggable. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654079 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 06:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040631.n846V4iI008225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-04 02:31:03 EDT --- This is a new BR of the latest Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 07:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 03:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040747.n847llrR021774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #22 from Patrice FERLET 2009-09-04 03:47:44 EDT --- Compiles on fedora 11... not rawhide. I did some modifications and I will put it on my server today. Rawhide uses PHP 5.3 and PHP-GTK doesn't compile. I know that Remy Collet tries to compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 07:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 03:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040755.n847tLo5023666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 03:55:20 EDT --- Well, actually I don't know PHP well, however if you have a srpm which compiles on F-11, it is highly appreciated if you upload the srpm anyway. Maybe someone (maybe including me) can help with get your srpm built on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 07:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 03:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040757.n847vS27024155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #5 from Colin Coe 2009-09-04 03:57:26 EDT --- Thank you for the detailed review. I believe I have addressed the points you raised and have updated the files. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-3.src.rpm Please note that this is intended to be build on RHEL5 so some of the macros I can't use. Thanks again CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 09:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040904.n8494w15022753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Bug 520278 depends on bug 520437, which changed state. Bug 520437 Summary: RFE: Rebuild to depend on desktop-notification-daemon and not notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520437 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 09:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040911.n849BPLW005390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-04 05:11:24 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 09:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909040954.n849sLNB000336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #2 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-04 05:54:20 EDT --- Updated files ready to be reviewed: Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-10/kompozer-0.8a4-4.olea.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 12:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226157] Merge Review: module-init-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041209.n84C9FAB027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226157 --- Comment #12 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-04 08:09:11 EDT --- jcm, ping: Comment #11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 12:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041212.n84CCeEU009304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #4 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-04 08:12:39 EDT --- Removed `Requires: perl'. Spec in the same url as before. I'll probably make some pre-reviews then, since now I don't have any other packages to make and request review. Also, seems that many packages in "no one is reviewing" actually have some sort of reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041322.n84DMr96010512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041329.n84DTJwO011808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041342.n84Dgpb9028909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |maven-plugin-bundle - |maven-plugin-bundle - Maven | |Bundle Plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] New: Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle-2.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Provides a maven plugin that supports creating an OSGi bundle from the contents of the compilation classpath along with its resources and dependencies. Plus a zillion other features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041344.n84DidOA015971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-04 09:44:38 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041345.n84DjV0W016852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-04 09:45:30 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041344.n84DiJLR015754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |486360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041344.n84DitLq016051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041344.n84DiwWw016113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Bug 521069 depends on bug 521067, which changed state. Bug 521067 Summary: Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520808] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041346.n84DkUPZ030646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520808 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-04 09:46:29 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:47:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041347.n84DlJ5t030788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-04 09:47:17 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521064] Review Request:kxml - Small XML pull parser specially designed for constrained environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041346.n84Dk9Af030536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521064 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-04 09:46:08 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 13:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] New: Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Summary: Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/constantine-kde-theme/constantine-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/constantine-kde-theme/constantine-kde-theme-11.90.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is Constantine KDE Theme Artwork containing KSplash theme and KDM theme. It's first try, please comment but we need it pre-prepared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041410.n84EAZs0003332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-04 10:10:34 EDT --- Formal review of voms package. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] $ rpmlint voms-1.9.11-3.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/voms- voms.src:438: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package vomsjapi %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} Explained in comment #2 voms.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/vomses Its and empty directory for a subsequent modular configuration - fine. But see point below. voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on voms/voms-libs/libvoms Explained in comment #2 voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Fine voms-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/voms voms voms-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/voms voms Correct the voms service running as voms logs to /var/log/voms voms-server.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/voms voms handles its own logrotation. voms-server.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/voms Explained in comment #2 voms-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name voms ('voms-server', 'voms-serverd') Service is called vomsd. (In fact this really should be valid with rpmlint, will submit a bug later) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . It does. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . It does # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . It does # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . It does ASL 2.0 # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Yes , # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] It is # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] It is # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes CVS URL works. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] It built on my x86_64 f11 within mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654893 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654893 # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] Not relavent. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] $ rpm -q --scripts voms postinstall program: /sbin/ldconfig postuninstall program: /sbin/ldconfig So fine. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] Not relavent. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Hmm it looks lie /usr/share/m4 is created but not owned by this package. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] It does not. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] Yes # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] Yes # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Yes # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] It does. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] They are. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] It does. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] They are. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] Not relavent. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] Not relavent. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] They are. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] It does. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] It does not. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] Not realvent. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] It does not. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] It does. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] # They are. So to wrap up two things: 1) On upgrade something odd happens. rpm -Uvh voms-* 1:voms warning: /etc/vomses created as /etc/vomses.rpmnew and results in $ ls -ld /etc/vomses /etc/vomses.rpmnew drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 2009-08-31 10:44 /etc/vomses -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-09-04 15:35 /etc/vomses.rpmnew which is just odd. I would guess adding a %dir sorts this out but am unsure. %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/vomses 2) I think /usr/share/m4 containing /usr/share/m4/voms.mp4 is created by but not owned by the %file listing. 3) Lastly koji build --scratch dist-f12 voms-.....src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654893 clearly has some build problems. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041413.n84EDHf6003996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |OpenGTL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041412.n84ECcJN003887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041432.n84EW7UE009293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-04 10:32:06 EDT --- [XX] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. % rpmlint *.rpm OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on OpenGTL/OpenGTL-libs/libOpenGTL OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/OpenGTL/GTLImageIO/Extensions/libRawDC.so OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/OpenGTL/GTLImageIO/Extensions/libPngDC.so OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [XX] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Seems to be LGPLv2+ in headers of sources. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [OK] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other: Doxygen is built, but I don't see any docs in %files. Is it not installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041438.n84EcfIH028156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-04 10:38:40 EDT --- looks simple enough... licensing... ok source... 7d73d3b9e1e00343d624c048b375393f constantine-kde-theme-11.90.2.tar.bz2 rpmlint: $ rpmlint *.rpm constantine-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksplash/Themes/Constantine/2048x1536/constantine.png ../../../../../../backgrounds/constantine/default/standard/constantine.png constantine-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksplash/Themes/Constantine/1920x1200/constantine.png ../../../../../../backgrounds/constantine/default/wide/constantine.png constantine-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/kde4/apps/ksplash/Themes/Constantine/2048x1536/logo.png ../../../../../../pixmaps/system-logo-white.png constantine-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/themes/Constantine/system-logo-white.png ../../../../../pixmaps/system-logo-white.png constantine-kde-theme.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/themes/Constantine/constantine.png ../../../../../backgrounds/constantine/default/standard/constantine.png 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. confirmed symlinks are satisfied by constantine-backgrounds dep. functionality: ksplash, kdm works ok (first draft, modulo minor esthetic issues... can be sorted out later). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041441.n84EfTsn011264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-04 10:41:28 EDT --- docs are in devel: %doc html/* I'll check about the arch'd stuff under %%_datadir (eww). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New: New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Summary: New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alee at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- First pass at pki-selinux package for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041445.n84Ej77T029965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041448.n84EmRmI030672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041447.n84Elwkc030573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 10:47:53 EDT --- First please write new package CVS request following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041452.n84EqioF031727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 10:52:41 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 14:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041459.n84Ex2NO000569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-04 10:59:01 EDT --- Rex, thanks for quick review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: constantine-kde-theme Short Description: Constantine KDE Theme Owners: jreznik rdieter kkofler ltinkl than Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041502.n84F2cUq015446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 11:02:37 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041502.n84F2dE8015475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Bug 518083 depends on bug 518082, which changed state. Bug 518082 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041520.n84FKd4s005581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-04 11:20:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: glew New Branches: EL-5 EL-4 Owners: orion InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes Adam has indicated his approval via email. Don't know if he wants to co-own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041527.n84FRJcT020772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |521261, 473302(F12Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041551.n84Fpnnq012545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-04 11:51:48 EDT --- OK, initial update addressing the fhs issue, and a couple other cosmetic ones: SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/OpenGTL-0.9.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Not buildable on fedora atm, due to llvm's --enable-assertions , see bug #521261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041559.n84FxoM2028191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-04 11:59:49 EDT --- You forgot to attach spec- and srpm-file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 15:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 11:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041557.n84FvN1P027892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 Robin Green changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greenrd at greenrd.org --- Comment #2 from Robin Green 2009-09-04 11:57:22 EDT --- It pauses during the build and asks me to select a coding system (where UTF-8 is the default). It shouldn't do this - it should just use UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 16:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041618.n84GI6Ff017922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) | --- Comment #19 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-09-04 12:18:05 EDT --- Uh, I've got problem. I did all the steps from wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join, but "make update" fails: % make update Creating a new update for hdapsd-20090401-4.fc12 Password for ttorcz: Creating a new update for hdapsd-20090401-4.fc12 hdapsd-20090401-4.fc12 not tagged as an update candidate Yet it seems that tag already exists: % make tag cvs tag -c hdapsd-20090401-4_fc12 ERROR: Tag hdapsd-20090401-4_fc12 has been already created. The following tags have been created so far hdapsd-20090401-4_fc13:devel:ttorcz:1252079380 hdapsd-20090401-4_fc12:F-12:ttorcz:1252079571 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 What to do? BTW, koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130621 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041700.n84H0Dtv008403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 13:00:12 EDT --- Currently F-12 koji build will go to rawhide tree directly so "make update" is not needed. (By the way if you want to build this for F-11 please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests and write "Package Change Request" here) Closing as F-12/13 build is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041715.n84HFXuG011617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-04 13:15:31 EDT --- FYI, the very last update (with merged patches) SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libvdpau.spec Summary: Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API libvdpay_trace.so was already bundled IIRC but I'm not sure of why it should be splitted in another package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041729.n84HTusA032671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 --- Comment #21 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-09-04 13:29:55 EDT --- I've got my laptop upgrade to rawhide, so I will pass F11. I wouldn't have chance to maintain it properly. Thank you very much for review and sponsorship! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041734.n84HYKVx015236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-04 13:34:19 EDT --- For -3: * initscript treatment - Still Requires(post) or so are missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets ( See Requires(post) or so item ) - Again usually service should not be enabled by default. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line chkconfig line in vmpsd.init should be: -------------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 92 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------- - And would you check if "condrestart" is not neeeded? * SourceURL - For sourceforge.net hosted source tarball, please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * %clean section - I recommend to write %clean section after %install section. * make - On %build section, "make" is enough, "DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" is not needed ( DESTDIR=foo is needed for "make install" ) ! Again please add %{?_smp_mflags} if possible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Specifying user/group with "install" command - cannot be done as usually rpmbuild is done as non-previledged user. So in rpmbuild "-o root -g root" with install fails, this is simply not needed. * Macros - Please use macros even in %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041742.n84HgVxU003495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 --- Comment #1 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-09-04 13:42:30 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041742.n84Hg0VA017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-04 13:41:58 EDT --- I fixed the compilation flags issue: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 17:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041756.n84HuNDo020864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-04 13:56:22 EDT --- I've realized there are potential patent issues with this package. It includes one working backend, i965_drv_video, which does accelerated MPEG decoding on Intel i965 hardware. I'm not sufficiently knowledgeable about the applicable patents in this area, nor enough of a coder to understand exactly what gets done in the code in libva as opposed to what gets done in the hardware on the card, so I don't know if this component of the package is shippable in Fedora or not. We can always ship the package without it, but I'd like to find out whether that's necessary. Hence, blocking FE-LEGAL. The code in question is in the i965_drv_video/ directory within the source tarball in the SRPM. Thanks! -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 18:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041807.n84I7aFt008515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-04 14:07:35 EDT --- sorry, updated SRPM link (I realized putting mplayer builds on fedorapeople was a bad idea...): http://www.happyassassin.net/video-experimental/rawhide/SRPMS/libva-0.30.4.1.sds5-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 18:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041827.n84IRKpq012009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 18:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] New: Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Summary: Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbooth at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mbooth/virt-v2v/virt-v2v.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mbooth/virt-v2v/virt-v2v-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: virt-v2v is a tool for converting virtual machines to use the KVM hypervisor. It modifies both the virtual machine image and its associated libvirt metadata. virt-v2v will also configure a guest to use VirtIO drivers if possible. virt-v2v also includes the virt-snapshot tool, which will modify a guest to use snapshot storage, and later commit the snapshot back to the original storage if desired. ---- This is my first Fedora package and I am seeking a sponsor. I am the primary developer of this application. The package currently only builds against dist-f12. I'm targeting EPEL-5, but there are outstanding dependency issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 18:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041838.n84IcaDn028196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |awilliam at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-04 14:38:35 EDT --- This was approved by FESco today, so I'm taking it for review. Couple of things. You can simplify the exclusivearch stuff: %if 0%{?fedora} > 11 || 0%{?rhel} > 5 ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64 %else %if 0%{?fedora} == 11 ExclusiveArch: i586 x86_64 %else ExclusiveArch: i386 x86_64 %endif (put the else and if on one line, and that lets you remove one endif - it's all one clause, then). As I understand the versioning policy, there should be a . between the revision (5, at present) and the git date bit. It should be libvdpau-0.1-0.5.git20090902.fc11 , not libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.fc11 - see the examples at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages . rpmlint throws an invalid-soname error on libvdpau-trace.so . It's an unversioned lib in %{_libdir} (not a subdirectory) in a non-devel package, which is unusual. What exactly is it used for? Should it be versioned, or put in a subdirectory? Aside from the above, package looks good to me. rpmlint output: [adamw at adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [adamw at adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libvdpau-0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12.x86_64.rpm libvdpau.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-0.5git20090902 ['0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12', '0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12'] libvdpau.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libvdpau_trace.so libvdpau_trace.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [adamw at adam SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libvdpau-devel-0.1-0.5git20090902.aw_fc12.x86_64.rpm libvdpau-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 18:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041850.n84Io55l031317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-04 14:50:04 EDT --- X won't build (needs additional BRs -- see http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle.spec) X probably needs Requires fixed up to match or be similar to BRs X the last sentence of the description should be removed. X files good except for %{_javadir} line ... %{_javadir}/*, perhaps? - sources ok (md5sums match) - licensing fine - naming fine - lines <= 80 where possible - macros good, clean used appropriately - rpmlint fine: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-bundle-2.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-bundle-2.0.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-bundle.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-plugin-bundle.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-bundle 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-bundle-javadoc-2.0.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 19:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041905.n84J59OG020462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwilson at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Jarod Wilson 2009-09-04 15:05:06 EDT --- Stepping in on this one... 1) There are muliple "for SCRIPT in ncidd ncidsip ncidsip" lines in the spec. I doubt ncidsip needs to be done twice. 2) In %files, use standard macros for /usr/bin (%{_bindir}), /usr/sbin (%{_sbindir}), /usr/share (%{_datadir}), etc. 3) I'd argue that ncid-mythtv is an acceptable sub-package. Sure, its useless without mythtv running on your network somewhere, but we have all sorts of software that is in the same boat -- MPD frontends, libvdpau just approved today by FESCo, libXNVCtrl, the totem-mythtv plugin (probably the best example, as to be really useful, you need a mythtv backend on your network, and likely assorted codecs mythtv doesn't ship to play back mythtv recordings in totem), etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 19:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041907.n84J7v2K002445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #13 from Jarod Wilson 2009-09-04 15:07:56 EDT --- ...assorted codecs FEDORA doesn't ship... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 19:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909041926.n84JQdgp006645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #20 from Jarod Wilson 2009-09-04 15:26:37 EDT --- > We also had a discussion on freenode.net #pcp about what to do with the Perl > binding for PCP. Perhaps you could provide some guidance here for the packaging > perspective - the perl binding is part of the main src tree (below src/cpan) > but the packaging is currently driven by MakeMaker (with a manual step to build > the pcp perl RPMs from the resulting spec). Ideally, we'd like the perl binding > to be a sub-package, e.g. "pcp-perl-this-and-that", with the build and > packaging all driven by the main spec. I have some simple changes to the spec > that implements this but it probably violates the Fedora Perl packaging > guidelines - anything perl'ish should be named "perl-something". Yes, they should definitely be built from the main spec and the same source rpm, since they're all in the same source tarball. If naming is the only issue here, then simply use '%package -n perl-pcp-something'. The -n says "don't prepend the main package name to this". Do teh same for %description, %files, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 20:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909042018.n84KIcne003721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-04 16:18:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 20:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909042015.n84KF1Z9002946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-04 16:15:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 20:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909042017.n84KHMLX003530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-04 16:17:21 EDT --- Sorry about that... I missed that this was the re-review. :( Note that you may have to file a ticket with rel-eng to unblock the package if it was blocked. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 20:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909042019.n84KJY0r017090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-04 16:19:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 4 21:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909042119.n84LJdTt016903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #10 from Stephen Warren 2009-09-04 17:19:37 EDT --- > rpmlint throws an invalid-soname error on libvdpau-trace.so . It's an > unversioned lib in %{_libdir} (not a subdirectory) in a non-devel package, > which is unusual. What exactly is it used for? Should it be versioned, or put > in a subdirectory? libvpau_wrapper.so is dlopen()s "libvdpau_trace.so" (by that exact name), if a certain environment variable is set to request this. In that case, all APIs that would usually be handled directly by the driver DSO (e.g. libvdpau_nvidia.so) are proxied through the trace library, which spews debug information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050107.n8517fW8024261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Matthew Harmsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #359453|1 |0 is patch| | Attachment #359453|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050108.n851834h005960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Matthew Harmsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #359454|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] New: Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Summary: Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libvmime07.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/libvmime07-0.7.1-1.src.rpm Description: VMime is a powerful C++ class library for parsing, generating or editing Internet RFC-[2]822 and MIME messages. VMime is designed to provide a fast and an easy way to manipulate Internet mail messages. It also includes support for using messaging protocols (POP3, IMAP, SMTP and maildir) with a lot of features supported: listing folders, downloading and adding messages to folders, extracting parts from message, getting and setting message flags and a lot more. This package contains an old and deprecated version of libvmime. You need it only if the software you are using hasn't been updated to work with the newer version and the newer API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050122.n851MkFH008385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |521352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050122.n851Miqt008332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 01:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050123.n851Nx8x026925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Matthew Harmsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 02:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050257.n852vugD024753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #11 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-04 22:57:54 EDT --- Awesome. I applied for the packager group. My account name is elanthis. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 03:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 23:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050338.n853cHAE031166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Ed Brand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) | --- Comment #43 from Ed Brand 2009-09-04 23:38:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sslogger Short Description: A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation Owners: ebrand Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: mtasaka Reading the doc, where is the fedora-cvs flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 03:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 23:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050357.n853v4Q9020095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #44 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-04 23:57:03 EDT --- It is in Bugzilla, look at the top of this page, you should see: Flags: (edit). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 04:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909050438.n854cPcM026327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #14 from Eric Sandeen 2009-09-05 00:38:24 EDT --- Updates for those: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ncid/ncid.spec http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ncid/ncid-0.74-2.fc12.src.rpm -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 10:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 06:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051003.n85A3hSp013629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #7 from Colin Coe 2009-09-05 06:03:42 EDT --- Thanks for your patience. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-4.src.rpm I think I've addressed these concerns. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 11:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051156.n85Bua9F013184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #7 from Arun SAG 2009-09-05 07:56:34 EDT --- Any one interested in reviewing this package? Its open to all :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 13:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051317.n85DHsCW025896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 13:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 09:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051344.n85DipOo015758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Ed Brand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 15:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051520.n85FKjRt017129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 --- Comment #3 from Warren Togami 2009-09-05 11:20:43 EDT --- I didn't build this into Fedora yet because I am testing its safety. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 16:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051602.n85G2dKc024099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zdzichu at irc.pl --- Comment #5 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-09-05 12:02:38 EDT --- Debian ITP has IMO better description and short blurb about rfkill. It is clearer for people not familiar with "rfkill" term. #v+ Description : tool for enabling and disabling wireless devices rfkill is a simple tool for accessing the Linux rfkill device interface, which is used to enable and disable wireless networking devices, typically WLAN, Bluetooth and mobile broadband. #v- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 16:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051644.n85GiBMG016685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546 Richard MacKenzie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mackenzie.richard at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Richard MacKenzie 2009-09-05 12:44:10 EDT --- wvdial 1.60-8 will not install on Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 17:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051743.n85HhCZw026254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-05 13:43:11 EDT --- Okay, then I will wait for your pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 17:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 13:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051742.n85Hg8BL026152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-05 13:42:07 EDT --- For -4: * SourceURL - I recommend to use %{name} and %{version} macro in SourceURL (especially %{version}), with this you probably won't have to change SourceURL when version is upgraded: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * condrestart - condrestart should be in %postun: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * Timestamps - Please add "-p" option to "install" command https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------ install %{S:2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name} ------------------------------------------------------ * Macros - /usr/share/man should be %{_mandir} * Documents - Forgot to mention, however: * Please add COPYING{.GPL} to %doc * And consider to add ChangeLog, README to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 18:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 14:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051818.n85IIxsn014048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-05 14:18:57 EDT --- New upstream version has appeared. This one is also rpmlint clean: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-bin-prot-1.2.18-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 19:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051933.n85JXDvs025947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-05 15:33:12 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 19:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051933.n85JXb7j026008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-05 15:33:35 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 19:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 15:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051941.n85Jf2Dc013170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Julian Aloofi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |julian.fedora at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |julian.fedora at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Julian Aloofi 2009-09-05 15:41:01 EDT --- I'm taking that request. Builds without problems, no rpmlint warnings. A in-depth review is coming soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 20:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] New: Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Summary: Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bernie at codewiz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/etckeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/etckeeper-0.40-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The etckeeper program is a tool to let /etc be stored in a git, mercurial, bzr or darcs repository. It hooks into yum to automatically commit changes made to /etc during package upgrades. It tracks file metadata that version control systems do not normally support, but that is important for /etc, such as the permissions of /etc/shadow. It's quite modular and configurable, while also being simple to use if you understand the basics of working with version control. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 21:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] New: Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Summary: Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: nuoveXT2 is a very complete set of icons for several operating systems. It is also the default icon-theme of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. Note: This is a split off from lxde-common to avoid unnecessary updates of data that doesn't change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 21:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052125.n85LPWHK012548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-05 17:25:31 EDT --- Sorry, wrong file. The correct srpm is http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 21:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052127.n85LRWSl031060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 21:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052126.n85LQxpW030983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 21:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052146.n85LkDGQ001768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 22:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052242.n85MgJBG011694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 22:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 18:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909052241.n85Mfoee011625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-05 18:41:49 EDT --- $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUSTs ----- OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source, md5sum fits OK: package compiles successfully N/A: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires there aren't any BuildRequires N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK: macros are consistently used N/A: package contains code package contains *.png files, but this is ok since this is an icon theme N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files N/A: program runs properly without files listed in %doc there is no program which could be run N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application this package actually provides GUI.. OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary a localization is not neccessary for this package OK: package builds in mock N/A: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures this is a noarch package N/A: program runs there is no program which could be run N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required The package seems to be okay. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 00:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 20:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060046.n860kr9T013863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-05 20:46:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxde-icon-theme Short Description: Default icon theme for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 01:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060139.n861d9jn007546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-05 21:39:08 EDT --- Removed the loop and added a comment on the conditional. http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior-0.6-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 01:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Lightweight Media Player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060143.n861hoIO022713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: whaawmp - |Review Request: whaawmp - |Media Player written in |Lightweight Media Player |pygtk that uses GStreamer | --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-05 21:43:48 EDT --- Reworked summary and description. Rpmlint is silent. http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/whaawmp.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/whaawmp-0.2.12.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 01:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 21:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060159.n861x7xG025160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-05 21:59:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Just two minor notes at the bottom. One being the already acknowledged .desktop > file issue. Do you know if its been bought up with the packaging committee? Not sure if packaging committee is the right place to ask. This needs to be fixed in desktop-file-utils upstream. I will ask on the xdg-mailing list, but these things take time. Until then we should just ignore these files. > - I think the package needs to depend on hicolor-icon-theme due to installing > icons into dirs owned by that package. I can add it it you like, but it's not really needed because *all* gtk stuff already requires highcolor-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 02:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060225.n862P4gh016834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #9 from Colin Coe 2009-09-05 22:25:02 EDT --- Thanks for your continued patience I've addressed your concerns for -4. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-5.src.rpm CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 04:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 00:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060428.n864Sfh4005252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 00:28:39 EDT --- Hey Matt. I took a quick look, and a few things to address before a review: 1. It looks like your are building some of the internally bundled copies of libraries: Build tkhtml3 ........................: yes Build tkImg ..........................: yes Build Utah Raster Toolkit.............: yes Build Template Numerical Toolkit......: yes Build openNURBS.......................: yes Build NIST STEP Class Libraries.......: yes You should use system versions of these, or in cases they don't yet exist in Fedora, submit them for review first. I know tkImg at least is in Fedora already, not sure about the others. 2. The License tag doesn't appear right... see the Licesing page for the correct tags, and note that "," is not valid. 3. rpmlint has a number of complaints. Try and address those? If you can take a look at those and spin up a new package I can look at reviewing this for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 05:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 01:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060547.n865ll0d031852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-09-06 01:47:46 EDT --- All seems ok in the spec. Just a quick note Froms upstream, it requires PHP 5.1.3 (which is still not available in EPEL4), so, for documentation: BuildRequires: php-devel >= 5.1.3 A minimal %check seems usefull (even if not mandatory), for example : %check # simple module load test cd %{pecl_name}-%{version} php --no-php-ini \ --define extension_dir=modules \ --define extension=%{pecl_name}.so \ --modules | grep %{pecl_name} I will do a full review asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 05:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 01:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060559.n865xdKZ019261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #24 from Remi Collet 2009-09-06 01:59:38 EDT --- Yes it doesn't build against php 5.3.0, even CVS version (it's the main reason why I didn't do the review as I'm using it for more than a year) I have also note than for EL5, you need to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to xulrunnner library directory (to be check again, my tests are old). As my tests are quite old, I will do more with latest SVN where some commit seems php 5.3.0 related. http://svn.php.net/viewvc/gtk/php-gtk/trunk/ If ok, it seems reasonnable to do a review for 2.0.1 stable for fedora 10+11 and for a SVN snapshot for rawhide (various other extension runs beta or patched version in rawhide for this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 06:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] New: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Summary: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.56-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: VRQ is modular verilog parser that supports plugin tools to process verilog. Multiple tools may be invoked in a pipeline fashion within a single execution of vrq. It is a generic front-end parser with support for plugin backend customizable tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 06:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 02:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060606.n8666G0X002722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-06 02:06:15 EDT --- Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658001 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658004 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 08:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 04:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060843.n868htuE018949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-06 04:43:54 EDT --- Thanks Remi, I have updated the spec with the changes requested. http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060916.n869Grfe005573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060946.n869krQf032094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-06 05:46:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-mud Short Description: MUD client for GNOME desktop Owners: elanthis Branches: F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060945.n869jqmr011629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-06 05:45:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtelnet Short Description: TELNET protocol parsing framework Owners: elanthis Branches: F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060955.n869tZo4013395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 T Sue-Ako changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tsueako at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from T Sue-Ako 2009-09-06 05:55:33 EDT --- I noticed the following messages when I downloaded http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm and began to build under my user id and also root: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, installing and using it in emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060957.n869vOQ0013714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 --- Comment #1 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-06 05:57:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-2.fc12.src.rpm Fixed a typo I just caught in the source URL for the spec file. Updated to release -2 and added a changelog note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 10:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 06:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061011.n86ABqrp016183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-06 06:11:49 EDT --- Well, while I am not familiar with PHP: I based on http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SRPMS/ , modified for rawhide and succeeded to build on rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658076 srpm is under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_1658076/ ! Note that I just tried to build on rawhide and did not try anything else (i.e I have not checked any packaging guideline issue) Two thing: - The reason vanilla php-gtk 2.0.1 won't build due to error messages like -------------------------------------------------- ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c: At top level: ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1531: error: duplicate 'static' ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1542: error: duplicate 'static' ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1548: error: duplicate 'static' ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1554: error: duplicate 'static' -------------------------------------------------- is due to a slight API change in /usr/include/php/Zend/zend_API.h: -------------------------------------------------- #define ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX(name, pass_rest_by_reference, return_reference, required_num_args) \ - zend_arg_info name[] = { \ + static const zend_arg_info name[] = { \ { NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0, 0, pass_rest_by_reference, return_reference, required_num_args }, ------------------------------------------------------ So simply removing "static" before using ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFOXXXXXXX in php-gtk source code will solve this. The following script is _very slow_ however it will work anyway: ------------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} >= 12 set +x echo "Fixing source code for PHP 5.3.0 ..." grep -rl '^ZEND_' . | while read file do cp -pf $file $file.orig echo -n -e "\tfor $file ... " ( sed -i -e 's|^static$||' $file line=0 num=0 num_a=0 hold=0 cat $file.orig | while read line do num=$((num + 1)) num_a=$((num_a + 1)) if [ $num_a -ge 10000 ] ; then num_a=0 ; echo -n "*" ; fi if [ $hold = 1 ] ; then hold=0 if echo $line | grep -vq '^ZEND_' ; then num_b=$((num - 1)) sed -i -e "${num_b}s|^.*$|static|" $file fi fi if echo $line | grep -q '^static$' ; then hold=1 ; fi done ) echo -e "\tdone" done set -x -------------------------------------------------------------------- - And the following patch is needed http://rpms.famillecollet.com/files/php-gtk-php53.patch (the argument of zend_set_timeout() changed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 11:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061122.n86BMpOO027578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell 2009-09-06 07:22:50 EDT --- Another upstream update. SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/mojomojo-0.999040-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 11:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061137.n86Bboft030015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #9 from Arun SAG 2009-09-06 07:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I noticed the following messages when I downloaded > http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm > and began to build under my user id and also root: > > rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > > other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, > installing and using it in emacs. Hi, Thanks for the review.You are getting the warnings as you don't have the user zer0c00l in your machine. Please build the src.rpm as normal user. 'rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm' works fine for me (no warnings). You can install resulted rpms using 'yum localinstall --nogpgcheck' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 11:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061154.n86Bsdvd000438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #10 from Arun SAG 2009-09-06 07:54:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Another question, How did you built the binary rpms from the source rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 12:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061248.n86CmtxP009870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #11 from T Sue-Ako 2009-09-06 08:48:53 EDT --- Running under my user id produces aforementioned user/group warnings, but does not seem to stop the creation of the rpms. i.e. rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Installing emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9GAaOw + umask 022 + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf haskell-mode-2.4.20090815 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/SOURCES/haskell-mode-2.4.20090815.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' (etc.) I had originally created the binary rpms in this manner: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild -bb rpmbuild/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec BTW, I ran this under both i686 and x86_64 machines with identical outcomes (i.e. successful outcomes in spite of warnings). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 13:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 09:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061352.n86Dq6l6008689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 09:52:05 EDT --- nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 14:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061420.n86EK9Ca013110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 --- Comment #7 from Rafael Gomes 2009-09-06 10:20:08 EDT --- Please don't forget this bug! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 14:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514105] Review Request: courier-imap - The Courier IMAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061421.n86ELF3g013367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514105 Rafael Gomes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaelgomes at projetofedora.o | |rg --- Comment #11 from Rafael Gomes 2009-09-06 10:21:13 EDT --- Please don't forget this bug! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 14:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 10:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061447.n86ElUrY017337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #5 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-09-06 10:47:28 EDT --- Hi, I'm sorry for the delay. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-2/gnomenu.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-2/gnomenu-1.9.9-2.fc11.src.rpm [lonely at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint gnomenu-1.9.9-2.fc11.noarch.rpm gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gnomenu.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gnomenu/prefix 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Can I ignore this? >> gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib rpmlint is still complaining about /etc/gnomenu/prefix do not look like an .conf file, but this file only contains this parameter: /usr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 15:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061515.n86FF4Yc003199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 11:15:03 EDT --- trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 15:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061511.n86FBjTM002417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-06 11:11:43 EDT --- Built for Rawhide and F-11. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 15:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 11:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061555.n86Ft1Gb028855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #2 from Julian Aloofi 2009-09-06 11:55:00 EDT --- rpmlint output of all files is clean: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - You should try to ask upstream to include a COPYING file. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - you should change %{python_sitelib}/* to %{python_sitelib}/pip* - why don't you use the default file permissions for %{_bindir}/pip? MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK - MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -The package builds in mock for Fedora 10, 11 and rawhide -Koji scratch builds for F11 and rawhide successful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 16:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 12:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061618.n86GIwLB000302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-06 12:18:57 EDT --- For -5: * Initscripts (condrestart) - condrestart in %post scriptlet is no longer needed ( as condrestart is called at %postun ) * Documents - Usually the file "INSTALL" is for people installing the software by building it by themselves and not needed for people using packaged rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 17:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061701.n86H16ra020558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-06 13:01:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Can I ignore this? >> gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib Yes, that's really not an error. > rpmlint is still complaining about /etc/gnomenu/prefix do not look like an > .conf file, but this file only contains this parameter: /usr I'd mark it as a config file. Of course, if you do then you'll get the warning about the file not being noreplace... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 17:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 13:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061717.n86HHusf023320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #7 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-09-06 13:17:55 EDT --- Surry, but, how can I do that? "I'd mark it as a config file." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061823.n86INPYu020881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-06 14:23:25 EDT --- Oh, you can safely drop %{_builddir}/%{name} from the commands in %prep. And I'd replace find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name "*.xml" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \; find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name "*.py" -type f -exec chmod a+x {} \; find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name "*.sh" -type f -exec chmod a+x {} \; with find -name "*.xml" -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \; find \( -name "*.py" -o -name "*.sh" \) -type f -exec chmod 755 {} \; for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061821.n86IL5v9000857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-06 14:21:04 EDT --- Replace %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/prefix with %config %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/prefix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061824.n86IO4Rc020990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-06 14:24:03 EDT --- And instead of sh %{_sourcedir}/%{name}-shebang.sh just run sh %{SOURCE1} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fon?= =?utf-8?q?ts_-_A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Gre?= =?utf-8?q?ek_typeface?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the ?Griechische Antiqua? Greek typeface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Summary: Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the ?Griechische Antiqua? Greek typeface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 18:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 14:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061840.n86IeC6Y023741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-06 14:40:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Griechische Antiqua was one of the historical Greek typefaces of the late 19th and early 20th century. It was designed by ?aurice ?duard Pinder, a German erudite artist and a member of the Academy of Science in Berlin. This is the most popular version which has appeared from 1870 to 1940 in the German speaking philological literature and in many classical and Byzantine editions by publishers like Teubner (in Leipzig) and Weidmann (in Berlin) such as: Anthology of Byzantine Melos by Wilhelm von Christ and Matthaios Paranikas (Leipzig 1871), Epicurea, by Heinrich Usener (Leipzig 1887), Mitrodorous by Alfred Koerte (Leipzig 1890), Pindar by Otto Schroeder (Leipzig 1908), ??? Aeschylus by U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (Berlin 1910, 1915), Bachylides by Bruno Snell (Leipzig, 1934), The Vulgata by Alfred Rahlfs (Stuttgart 1935), Suidas Lexicon by Ada Adler (Leipzig 1928-1938) etc. E.J. Kenney lamented the abandonment of the type after the 2nd World War as a great loss for Greek typography (?From Script to Print?, Greek Scripts: An illustrated Introduction, Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, 2001, p. 69). GFS Philostratos was digitized by George D. Matthiopoulos. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Philostratos_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062039.n86Kd6SU024213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2009-09-06 16:39:05 EDT --- Only remaining issue is that you're using a vendor-tag of 'fedora' in desktop-file-install. I'll approve the review once this is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062039.n86KdPO5024265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:39:23 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062039.n86Kdbuk024328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:39:35 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062039.n86Kdg3C024382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-3.fc11 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062043.n86Kha48013398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:43:35 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062043.n86Khg2g013442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-3.fc11 |0.4.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062039.n86KdTNT012231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.5-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062044.n86Kie06026069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:44:39 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062042.n86KgjgF025478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:42:42 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062044.n86KijbK026105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-1.fc11 |0.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062042.n86Kgoeu025518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062041.n86KfxEg025338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:41:58 EDT --- nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nforenum'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062043.n86Kh4Ep025569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:43:03 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062047.n86Klo5B027514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-06 16:47:49 EDT --- perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 20:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062047.n86KlsZi027562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.02-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 21:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062149.n86Lnn97026950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #8 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-06 17:49:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec SRPM URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm md5sums feca9c1d51d977d6110215635050f8b4 graphem.spec a5617606668fa120ecac8ed629430ca7 graphem-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm This fixes the issue with the vendor tag and adds also a patch which adds the graphem icon to the desktop-file. Patch URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.3.add-icon-to-desktopfile-00.patch 3e20d525764b03218f15021a36a36afa graphem-0.3.add-icon-to-desktopfile-00.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062202.n86M2pgd008592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #9 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-06 18:02:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec d2b588f6d84f2aa6950b1fb201e84068 graphem.spec Removed an unneccesary commented line from the specfile. Packages are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062205.n86M5vCl030171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 18:05:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062208.n86M8T4B009675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 18:08:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062209.n86M9PxZ009798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 18:09:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062207.n86M7ZxG009580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 18:07:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062213.n86MDA7Z031200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-06 18:13:09 EDT --- How can it be unsafe? Exposing the contents of messages to a 3rd party? It only sends the hash I thought... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 22:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062217.n86MHgHI011456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 --- Comment #5 from Warren Togami 2009-09-06 18:17:41 EDT --- The possibility of false positives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 23:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] New: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rlandman at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Locale::Maketext::Gettext joins the GNU gettext and Maketext frameworks. It is a subclass of Locale::Maketext(3) that follows the way GNU gettext works. You start as a usual GNU gettext localization project: Work on PO files with the help of translators, reviewers and Emacs. Turn them into MO files with msgfmt. Copy them into the appropriate locale directory, such as /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/myapp.mo. Then, build your Maketext localization class, with your base class changed from Locale::Maketext(3) to Locale::Maketext::Gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 23:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062315.n86NFt1f021902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 23:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062324.n86NOLXI023166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-06 19:24:20 EDT --- This is my first package, so I'm seeking a sponsor please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 23:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909062340.n86Nerbs013862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #11 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-09-06 19:40:52 EDT --- Hi, Jussi. Thanks for your patience. =) I'm really learning a lot here. Here we go: SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-3/gnomenu.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-3/gnomenu-1.9.9-3.fc11.src.rpm Following your advice we have only this error: gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings But, as we already know, it can be ignored. Again, thank you very much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 00:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 20:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070051.n870pnRq004645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #6 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-09-06 20:51:47 EDT --- Fabian, are you willing to review the spec file in its current form? The reason I don't use rpmdev-newspec is that my spec files are generated from an XML project description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 01:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 21:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070107.n8717L64007426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #21 from Mark Goodwin 2009-09-06 21:07:18 EDT --- Hi Jarod, v3.0.0-5 is ready for review : Spec URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp.spec SRPM URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Src.tgz : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-5.src.tar.gz (spec and src.tgz are identical to what's in the SRPM). The pcp-perl packaging (thanks for the comments) is not included - I'd rather avoid any further delay and instead add the perl packaging later once we're in Fedora - if this is a bad plan, please let me know :) The demo agents that ship src have been moved into the devel package. They're required for the PCP QA suite to run, but so is the rest of the devel package, so no problem there. I've also merged up with the recent 2.9.1 community release, which is stable and fully QA'd. [mgoodwin at fletch rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/{pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm,pcp-libs-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm,pcp-libs-devel-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm} pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/pcp pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pcp.env pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mounts/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/weblog/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/pcp/pmns/.NeedRebuild pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mmv/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/cisco/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mailq/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/linux/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/jstat/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/shping/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/summary/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/process/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/sendmail/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/trace/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lmsensors/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/apache/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/roomtemp/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lustrecomm/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pcp pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmproxy pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmie pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcp pcp-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.3 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 pcp-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_gui.so.1 libpcp_gui.so.2 pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp.so.2 libpcp.so.3 pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.2 libpcp_pmda.so.3 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 25 warnings. Many thanks -- Mark Goodwin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 01:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 21:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070148.n871m4KL001876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-06 21:48:02 EDT --- V 0.7: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070226.n872Q7vH008500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-06 22:26:06 EDT --- I think those errors are normal and can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 04:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070456.n874uvo1001993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 04:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070457.n874vBO9013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 05:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 01:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070526.n875Qoja019184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #6 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-07 01:26:49 EDT --- Ok, the license on the official website's page now reflects the LICENSE file in the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 06:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 02:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070626.n876QKhl030397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-07 02:26:19 EDT --- OK, thanks for that. Now you have to wait for a sponsor to get your package formally reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 06:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 02:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070641.n876f04f000558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 02:40:59 EDT --- - Drop the empty & commented Requires: and BuildRequires: lines. - Every time you update the spec file increment the Release: tag and make a comment in the changelog. So the last release was -2 and the next one is -3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070706.n8776lga005217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-07 03:06:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654079 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d1c624fb4ea79869a78382ec1db95860b696d8bc CatalystX-Component-Traits-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=19, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 3.28 cusr 0.20 csys = 3.52 CPU) + Package perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CatalystX::Component::Traits) = 0.10 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Moose::Role) perl(namespace::autoclean) perl(Scalar::Util) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070711.n877BHqM026667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-07 03:11:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1659288 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ee6256e041c4a20487edd7d8cbfe46760e745c18 GFS_PHILOSTRATOS.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070723.n877NSux029037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070723.n877NRQP029016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-07 03:23:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits Short Description: Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 07:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 03:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070723.n877N5A3028936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-CatalystX-Component-Tr |perl-CatalystX-Component-Tr |aits - Automatic Trait |aits - Automatic Trait |Loading and Resolution for |Loading and Resolution for | |Catalyst -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 08:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070802.n8782sif005075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-07 04:02:52 EDT --- Many thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-philostratos-fonts Short Description: A revival of the ?Griechische Antiqua? Greek typeface Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 08:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 04:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070801.n8781HZE017858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #11 from Colin Coe 2009-09-07 04:01:15 EDT --- Thanks for your continued patience I've addressed your concerns for -5. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-6.src.rpm CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 09:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 05:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070923.n879NF0U022348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-07 05:23:14 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 09:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 05:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070922.n879MHKM022214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-07 05:22:16 EDT --- Hi Kevin, |-- F-10 | |-- CVS | | |-- Entries | | |-- Repository | | `-- Root | |-- branch | `-- dead.package |-- F-11 | |-- CVS | | |-- Entries | | |-- Repository | | `-- Root | |-- branch | `-- dead.package |-- devel | |-- CVS | | |-- Entries | | |-- Repository | | `-- Root | `-- dead.package am I allowed to restore the CVS Makefiles myself? or should it be done as part of the CVS process? Either way works for me, but I don't want to break automatic scripts and stuff that takes care of those. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 10:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 06:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071054.n87AsY59009035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2009-09-07 06:54:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > So to wrap up two things: > > 1) On upgrade something odd happens. > > rpm -Uvh voms-* > 1:voms warning: /etc/vomses created as /etc/vomses.rpmnew > > and results in > > $ ls -ld /etc/vomses /etc/vomses.rpmnew > drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 2009-08-31 10:44 /etc/vomses > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-09-04 15:35 /etc/vomses.rpmnew > > which is just odd. Version -2 of the package did not contain the /etc/vomses file, this file was added in version -3. You had already created /etc/vomses when testing the -2 version, and since /etc/vomses is tagged as a config file that should not be overwritten the new version form the package was created as /etc/vomses.rpmnew. This is exactly as it should be and is neither odd nor strange. > I would guess adding a %dir sorts this out but am unsure. > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/vomses /etc/vomses is a file and not a directory, so tagging it as %dir is not appropriate. > 2) I think /usr/share/m4 containing /usr/share/m4/voms.mp4 is created by but > not > owned by the %file listing. Yet another "let's install files in weird places" issue from upstream. I have moved the file to the right place (usr/share/aclocal - where all other .m4 files are). I added a dependency on automake to the -devel package to depend on a package that owns this directory. Thank you for pointing this one out. > 3) Lastly > koji build --scratch dist-f12 voms-.....src.rpm > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1654893 > > clearly has some build problems. Yes, the package needed porting to openssl 1.0. Porting has been done and the patch sent upstream. Koji scratch build is now OK: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1659459 > Steve New version is here: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-1.9.11-4.fc11.src.rpm Mattias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 11:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071112.n87BC9fg026206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #9 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-07 07:12:08 EDT --- Ok, fixed the empty comments and the Release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 11:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] New: Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Summary: Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/hercstudio.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/hercstudio-1.0-0.1.beta.fc12.src.rpm Description: GUI front-end to the Hercules mainframe Emulator. Notes: Rebuilt Hercules packages with external GUI support are sitting in Bodhi (http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/hercules). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 12:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071210.n87CAHow026285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #7 from Colin Coe 2009-09-07 08:10:15 EDT --- Fix broken Apache config file. Tidied spec file http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.8.1.1-3.src.rpm CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 12:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071214.n87CE713007545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-07 08:14:06 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 12:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071215.n87CF0Qv027814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-07 08:15:00 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 12:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 08:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514602] Review Request: system-config-audit - an utility for editing audit configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071220.n87CKd3C010557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 14:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 10:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071436.n87Ea9kn026610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-07 10:36:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X won't build (needs additional BRs -- see > http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle.spec) Thanks, Fixed. > X probably needs Requires fixed up to match or be similar to BRs Fixed. Maven plugins are needed only at build time. > X the last sentence of the description should be removed. Fixed. > X files good except for %{_javadir} line ... %{_javadir}/*, perhaps? > Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-bundle-2.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071502.n87F2SBK030825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-07 11:02:27 EDT --- It builds, but you need to add a libguestfs version dep. The current dep: BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Guestfs::Lib) >= 1.0.68 doesn't work. It seems that perl() deps are unversioned and therefore rpm will happily accept any version. To make it fail properly on my old version of libguestfs I had to add: BuildRequires: libguestfs >= 1:1.0.68 ... Requires: libguestfs >= 1:1.0.68 Note also the epoch. --- After making the above change (and installing the requisite version of libguestfs), I was able to build it locally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071508.n87F8mou011083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-07 11:08:47 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1660335 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071518.n87FIYYW001632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:18:33 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071518.n87FIPiE013519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:18:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071518.n87FI7cR013404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:18:05 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071518.n87FIFhZ013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:18:13 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071523.n87FN0ff002847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:22:59 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071519.n87FJmDX001862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:19:43 EDT --- ping, please address the issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] New: Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 Summary: Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tom at moertel.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SPECS/R-plyr.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SRPMS/R-plyr-0.1.9-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: I have packaged plyr, a powerful data-manipulation package for the R statistical-computing system. The plyr package is a prerequisite for the ggplot2 package, which is rapidly becoming popular and will likely reach "must have" status shortly. I would appreciate a review so we can get R-plyr into Fedora as part of our work toward ggplot2. We have already discussed this package a bit on the fedora-r-devel list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-r-devel-list/2009-September/msg00004.html Thanks for your help! Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:20:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071520.n87FKGuo002435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-07 11:20:15 EDT --- + rpmlint output + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines Reporter doesn't think the Perl libraries are independently useful, so they don't need to go in a separate package and we don't need to follow the Perl naming guidelines for that too closely. + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines (See above about Perl packaging guidelines, although the package is broadly correct even for them). + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1660335 n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies Koji build proves this. + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* Although commented out at the moment, however this is correct for this package. n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described n/a scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ========== APPROVED by rjones ========== The only thing to do is to modify the spec file as in comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071524.n87FOVLR014885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:24:29 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071524.n87FOHNO003122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:24:16 EDT --- ping? what do you want to do about this? The package can go in as long as you fix the license tag to "GPL+ and LGPLv2+" (and address the other issues, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071535.n87FZOpF005637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-07 11:35:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > It builds, but you need to add a libguestfs version > dep. The current dep: > > BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Guestfs::Lib) >= 1.0.68 > > doesn't work. It seems that perl() deps are unversioned Untrue. perl(..) are referring to a perl-module's version, not to the rpm's or the package's versions. If a perl-module doesn't carry a version (from Perl's perspective), this perl module's version's rpm-representation, i.e. the perl(..) dep is unversioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071545.n87Fj1kE018932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-07 11:44:59 EDT --- Whoops, this slipped under my radar. ** License is OK Source matches upstream Spec conforms to Emacs guidelines Time stamps are kept ** I find it a bit of an overkill to use wildcards for a single file, so I'd replace e.g. %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg}/*.elc %{emacs_startdir}/*.el %dir %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg} with %{emacs_startdir}/%{pkg}.el %dir %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg} %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg}/%{pkg}.elc (it's more logical to have the dir before its contents on the list). With this note the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 15:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071555.n87FtLqC021134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-07 11:55:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > It builds, but you need to add a libguestfs version > > dep. The current dep: > > > > BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Guestfs::Lib) >= 1.0.68 > > > > doesn't work. It seems that perl() deps are unversioned > Untrue. perl(..) are referring to a perl-module's version, not to the rpm's or > the package's versions. > > If a perl-module doesn't carry a version (from Perl's perspective), this perl > module's version's rpm-representation, i.e. the perl(..) dep is unversioned. OK, understood. I opened a libguestfs bug to fix this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521674 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071614.n87GEpP4025531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071614.n87GETxX025459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-07 12:14:28 EDT --- Well, * In %changelog, we usually don't add %{?dist} to release number Please fix this when you import this package into Fedora CVS Now: - This package itself can be approved - As written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored we usually ask the person who needs sponsorship to either submit another review request or do a "pre-review" of other person's review request. Now you have other review requests and their packaging seems good to some extent from a quick glance. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (vmpsd) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071617.n87GH1bf026354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071616.n87GGioc026246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 16:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071652.n87GqAUE032592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #23 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-07 12:52:05 EDT --- Can you contact me, if glew is ready for EL-5, so I can build blender agains it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 17:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071742.n87HgtmE028889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-07 13:42:53 EDT --- Hi Mattias, This all looks good and am I am approving it. A great addition and my first package review. APPROVED Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 17:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 13:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909071751.n87HpMOf010963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-07 13:51:20 EDT --- This package was reviewed and tested with in the related review of the voms package in bug 517763 Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1660700 rpmlint: $ rpmlint SPECS/voms-mysql-plugin.spec \ RPMS/x86_64/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/voms-mysql-plugin-debuginfo-3.1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ SRPMS/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm voms-mysql-plugin.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning can be ignored since this package Requires: voms-server and that does contain documentation. APPROVED Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 20:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072002.n87K2EI8000590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-07 16:02:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/hercstudio.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/hercstudio-1.0-0.2.beta.fc12.src.rpm ChangeLog: - added patch from upstream to fix behaviour of the buttons in panel - made the dependency on Hercules versioned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 20:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521707] New: Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521707 Summary: Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathansteffan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/python-zc.buildout.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-zc.buildout-1.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: System for managing Python development buildouts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 20:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521707] Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072057.n87KvT9B010327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521707 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-09-07 16:57:28 EDT --- This package blocks any updates to plone. I'll need it to push out any builds/updates to the plone packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 21:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072122.n87LMmML015233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pbrobinson at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #18 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-07 17:22:44 EDT --- http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.34-1.fc12.src.rpm - Workaround for Rawhide dlsym problem (bug number referenced in spec) - PPC build enabled (fastcall disabled due to bug in LLVM) - All tests now pass on x86_64 -- still waiting for Koji to finish - Packaged Emacs mode file; support for other editors bundled in base package's docdir Koji build not available yet -- LLVM 2.6 switched the default to enabling PIC, which does not work properly on ix86, so I'm waiting for the next LLVM build to finish and get tagged. The fixed llvm-2.5 packages for F-11 should land in updates-stable soon, I just ordered a push -- meanwhile, install from updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 21:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072130.n87LUZ6m016707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-07 17:30:33 EDT --- SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libvdpau-0.1-0.6.20090902git.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libvdpau.spec Summary: Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 21:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072130.n87LUw7n016818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pbrobinson at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-07 17:30:57 EDT --- Oops, sorry, missed the last update in the busyness of the last week. Will update review now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 22:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521716] New: Review Request: python-zfec - A fast erasure codec with python bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zfec - A fast erasure codec with python bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521716 Summary: Review Request: python-zfec - A fast erasure codec with python bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-zfec.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-zfec-1.4.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fast, portable, programmable erasure coding a.k.a. "forward error correction": the generation of redundant blocks of information such that if some blocks are lost then the original data can be recovered from the remaining blocks. This is one of the needed dependencies for the Tahoe LAFS distributed filesystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 22:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] New: Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Summary: Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.15-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PyCryptopp is a set of Python wrappers for a few of the best crypto algorithms from the Crypto++ library (including SHA-256, AES, RSA signatures and Elliptic Curve DSA signatures). This is one of the needed dependencies for the Tahoe-LAFS distributed filesystem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 23:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072313.n87NDQMG023182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #36 from D Haley 2009-09-07 19:13:25 EDT --- I can examine this package again this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 23:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072324.n87NOYDb005730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Scott Radvan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 23:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521723] New: Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Summary: Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sradvan at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sradvan.fedorapeople.org/perl-Makefile-Parser/ SRPM URL: http://sradvan.fedorapeople.org/perl-Makefile-Parser/ Description: This is a simple parser for Makefiles. It supports a subset of the features recognized by GNU make, but not all of GNU make's advanced features. It provides support for other perl modules that require the building process specified in Makefiles but where the make module is not suitable. I'm looking for a sponsor because this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 23:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909072334.n87NYXVN027102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Ryan Lerch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 23:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521724] New: Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Summary: Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rlerch at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ryanlerch.fedorapeople.org/perl-Makefile-DOM/perl-Makefile-DOM.spec SRPM URL: http://ryanlerch.fedorapeople.org/perl-Makefile-DOM/perl-Makefile-DOM-0.004-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This libary can serve as an advanced lexer for (GNU) makefiles. It parses makefiles as "documents" and the parsing is lossless. The results are data structures similar to DOM trees. The DOM trees hold every single bit of the information in the original input files, including white spaces, blank lines and makefile comments. That means it's possible to reproduce the original makefiles from the DOM trees. In addition, each node of the DOM trees is modifiable and so is the whole tree, just like the PPI module used for Perl source parsing and the HTML::TreeBuilder module used for parsing HTML source. This is my first package - will somebody sponsor me please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 00:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 20:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] New: Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 Summary: Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fossil/fossil.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fossil-0.0-0.1.20090828225927.fc12.src.rpm Description: Fossil is a simple, high-reliability, distributed software configuration management with distributed bug tracking, distributed wiki and built-in web interface. rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 03:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 23:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080304.n8834isc002678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #15 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-07 23:04:43 EDT --- Alright, imported to CVS and built for both devel and F-12 successfully. That pretty much completes the Join wiki steps. Not sure if I'm supposed to follow the general New Package Policy and close this bug as NEXTRELEASE or if that's something you're supposed to handle as my sponsor. If it helps/matters, here's the build logs for Koji for libtelnet on F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521489] Include GPT fdisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080801.n8881H5w004645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521489 Keshav changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com, | |skodabenz at rocketmail.com Component|febootstrap |Package Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080820.n888KiNT008999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #24 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-08 04:20:41 EDT --- Since you've already done a good job bringing this package in shape, there isn't much left to do. If nobody else wants to do the re-review, I can do it later today. However, I'm not quite happy with the call of exit() in a shared library. This is simply bad style and should be avoided by all means. I'm not sure about Fedora's policy about this, though. Here is a patch that replaces the call of exit() by throwing an exception: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/givaro/givaro-exit.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080831.n888VZlR011606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Mattias Ellert 2009-09-08 04:31:34 EDT --- Thank you for the review... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: voms Short Description: Virtual Organization Membership Service Owners: ellert Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080831.n888Vdvx011638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-09-08 04:31:38 EDT --- Thank you for the review... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: voms-mysql-plugin Short Description: VOMS server plugin for MySQL Owners: ellert Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080837.n888b6BT030555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 08:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080836.n888aSsm030478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-08 04:36:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: virt-v2v Short Description: Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM Owners: mdbooth Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 09:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080922.n889M09H021354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-08 05:21:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Since you've already done a good job bringing this package in shape, there > isn't much left to do. If nobody else wants to do the re-review, I can do it > later today. > However, I'm not quite happy with the call of exit() in a shared library. This > is simply bad style and should be avoided by all means. I'm not sure about > Fedora's policy about this, though. > Here is a patch that replaces the call of exit() by throwing an exception: > http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/givaro/givaro-exit.patch Calling exit() is not forbidden (in fact it is quite common in scientific packages), so you can omit the rpmlint warning. You should not apply any patches that make functional changes, since that will break compatibility with upstream. You can ask upstream to make the change, though... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 09:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 05:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909080952.n889qPpT027941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #26 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-08 05:52:24 EDT --- Actually, throwing an exception doesn't change the code functionality in a significant way. It still stops the application if it's not caught but provides better memory handling. To me, using exit() in shared libraries is pretty amateurish style, especially in combination with C++. I also haven't seen it in any of the scientific packages I use. But anyway, if it's OK to leave it in the package, I can live with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081006.n88A63Fi031036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbooth at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-08 06:06:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Find New Branches: EL-5 Owners: I would like to add virt-v2v to EL-5, which has a dependency on perl-Module-Find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476313] Review Request: ifp-gnome - Manages Files on iRiver iFP-XXX Flash Music Devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081008.n88A8rP1031500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476313 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-08 06:08:51 EDT --- No bites, and I don't use this tool anymore (I just use ifpline). Also, probably the better solution is the firmware upgrade to use it like a USB mass storage device. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081006.n88A6J4p031175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476299] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081010.n88AAc5P032044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476299 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-08 06:10:37 EDT --- Closing as I lack the time needed to get this into shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081016.n88AGIcr018111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbooth at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-08 06:16:16 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-XPathEngine New Branches: EL-5 Owners: I would like to add perl-XML-XPathEngine to EL-5 ultimately so that I can add virt-v2v. virt-v2v requires perl-XML-DOM-XPath, which requires perl-XML-XPathEngine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081016.n88AGXM5001129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081020.n88AKFP4002040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbooth at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-08 06:20:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-DOM-XPath New Branches: EL-5 Owners: I would like to add perl-XML-DOM-XPath to EL-5 as it is a dependency of virt-v2v. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 10:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 06:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081020.n88AKTlA019473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 12:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081202.n88C2cMw025432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Colin Coe 2009-09-08 08:02:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vmpsd Short Description: A GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS Owners: coec Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: coec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 12:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081256.n88Cu8dc006031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-08 08:56:06 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 13:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 09:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081305.n88D5Pqw008428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #4 from Colin Coe 2009-09-08 09:05:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-3.src.rpm - Tidied spec file - Fixed the associated Apache config file which was syntactically incorrect - Added 'quickstart.sh' script to make installing RackTables easier for new users CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 14:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] New: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 14:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081422.n88EM3X0026791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-08 10:22:02 EDT --- I have built and run this package successfully and checked all the issues in the Review Guidelines against the package. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/fossil-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I think this package is good and I would APPROVE it, but I am not a packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 15:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081509.n88F9KLs007316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-08 11:09:18 EDT --- Failing again on PPC it seems :( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662666 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 15:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521489] Include GPT fdisk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081539.n88FdhRK001063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521489 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-08 11:39:42 EDT --- Then add it to the Fedora wishlist (or email your wish to fedora-devel-list at redhat.com). Open a bug against package review only if you have packaged it yourself and want it to be reviewed. Closing as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 15:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 11:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081544.n88Fiw1O018275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-08 11:44:57 EDT --- Hello! I am not in the packager group and therefore I will not be able to APPROVE your package. I am only reviewing, trying to help. Here are my suggestions (I've annotated this diff http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/robots.diff): --- django-robots.spec.orig 2009-08-25 23:41:41.000000000 +0300 +++ django-robots.spec 2009-09-08 18:33:51.713661335 +0300 @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ I can see that getting the source isn't trivial, but bitbucket provides archives of snapshots. %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} +%define snapshot 9db16b76dc19 + Name: django-robots Version: 0.6.1 Release: 1%{?dist} @@ -8,11 +10,12 @@ Group: Development/Languages License: BSD URL: http://bitbucket.org/jezdez/django-robots/ -Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://bitbucket.org/jezdez/%{name}/get/%{snapshot}.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) The package wouldn't build in mock without setuptools: BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: python-devel +BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel Requires: Django %description @@ -20,7 +23,7 @@ robots exclusion protocol, complementing the Django Sitemap contrib app. %prep -%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} +%setup -q -n %{name} %build %{__python} setup.py build Finally, I think the %files section would be better like this: @@ -35,10 +38,9 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc README.rst -%doc INSTALL.txt -%doc docs/overview.txt -%{python_sitelib}/* +%doc README.rst INSTALL.txt docs/* +%{python_sitelib}/robots/* +%{python_sitelib}/django_robots-%{version}-py2.6.egg-info %changelog * Fri Aug 21 2009 Luca Botti I also found the following rpmlint errors which should be easy to fix: django-robots.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog django-robots.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/robots/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo django-robots.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/robots/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521895] New: Review Request: json_simple - Simple Java toolkit for JSON Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: json_simple - Simple Java toolkit for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521895 Summary: Review Request: json_simple - Simple Java toolkit for JSON Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/json_simple/json_simple.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/json_simple/json_simple-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JSON.simple is a simple Java toolkit for JSON. You can use JSON.simple to encode or decode JSON text. * Full compliance with JSON specification (RFC4627) and reliable * Provides multiple functionalities such as encode, decode/parse and escape JSON text while keeping the library lightweight * Flexible, simple and easy to use by reusing Map and List interfaces * Supports streaming output of JSON text * Stoppable SAX-like interface for streaming input of JSON text * Heap based parser * High performance (see performance testing) * No dependency on external libraries * Both of the source code and the binary are JDK1.2 compatible $ rpmlint SPECS/json_simple.spec \ RPMS/x86_64/json_simple-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/json_simple-debuginfo-1.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ SRPMS/json_simple-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm SPECS/json_simple.spec:87: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} json_simple.src:87: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} both of these are caused just by the %if case of with or without gcj and can be ignored. f11, f12 and EL5 builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662712 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662717 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662730 Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081624.n88GOaEC012484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Bug 521166 depends on bug 521261, which changed state. Bug 521261 Summary: llvm: please build with --disable-assertions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521261 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081629.n88GTkRh014236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-08 12:29:44 EDT --- Looks good to me - accepted, as far as I'm concerned. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081638.n88Gce4T016394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-09-08 12:38:37 EDT --- Thank you, Jussi. I'll make that last change before checking in the package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-common-pmd Short Description: An interface to PMD for Emacs Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] New: Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Summary: Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: It utilizes Botan library for it's cryptographic functions, allowing for a large choice of algorithms to be used in SSH communications. As a developer you may wish to integrate SSH client functionality into your applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless hours developing your own solution. The SSH library was created by the NetSieben developers who, after researching the limited number of options available to them from both commercial and open source communities, found these solutions limited and at best, still in early stages of development. P.S. Spec file formated with tabs by 5-space width. Please do not start review if it is big problem for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 16:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081654.n88Gs9JP002111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ne7ssh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 17:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521913] New: Review Request: uxlaunch - A small and quick interface to start the Moblin Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uxlaunch - A small and quick interface to start the Moblin Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521913 Summary: Review Request: uxlaunch - A small and quick interface to start the Moblin Desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/uxlaunch.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/uxlaunch-0.23-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: An ultra-lightweight, very cut down gdm and gnome-session replacement designed to get the Moblin Desktop running as quick as possible. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 17:12:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081712.n88HCd9l006059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-08 13:12:38 EDT --- - Added Requires for -devel section as it is a MUST requirement. - Added post, postun for -devel package as well. - Cleaned up .la files in the shipped package. - Replaced rm with __rm usage. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.56-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662808 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662881 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 17:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 13:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081759.n88Hxff4015723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-08 13:59:40 EDT --- Some fix install on 64-bit systems. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL the same. Built successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1663037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081804.n88I47bK016804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-08 14:04:06 EDT --- Hi Peter, the spec, source tarball and src.rpm files can be found here: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081804.n88I4Cpp016893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|alexl at users.sourceforge.net |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-08 14:04:09 EDT --- Here comes the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm givaro.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgivaro.so.0.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 givaro-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation givaro-devel.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/givaro/givaro-makefile 0644 /bin/sh givaro-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. - call of exit() can be ignored according to comment #25 - missing docs in -devel and -static is OK - #!/bin/sh in makefile already removed according to comment #23 --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - GPLv2 boilerplates missing (upstream notified) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: files containing the text of the license(s) must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc of base package [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. - md5 hash is f0b754ee54bcac0e866f2979b57393ba [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. - builds in koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1662967 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Packages containing .so files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - base package contains libgivaro.so.0.0.4 - ldconfig called in %post and %postun [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - package not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - givaro-makefile contains #!/bin/sh that must be removed - already done according to comment #23 [+] MUST: %clean section must contain rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - libgivaro.a [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no .pc files [+] MUST: .so without suffix must go in a -devel package. - libgivaro.so [+] MUST: devel packages must require %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives - .la file removed in %install [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - I tested some of the functions provided by the library and they worked as expected - givaro-config prints the correct flags [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. call of ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - subpackage -static requires base and -devel package - Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} is redundant ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081806.n88I6kvg003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-08 14:06:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-plugin-bundle Short Description: Maven Bundle Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081814.n88IEJti005473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwright at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 18:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081821.n88ILicS020989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-08 14:21:41 EDT --- Umh.. src/kernel/zpz/StaticElement.h states it is under LGPLv2+, the rest of the files just say "see the copyright file" which doesn't exist. There is a COPYING that contains the GPLv3 license, thus the license tag should read GPL+. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081911.n88JBrw5032361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-08 15:11:52 EDT --- #001 ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 Add a comment to the spec file explaining the reason for this line. #002: Remove perl from BR Your http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1662810&name=root.log shows that perl was installed as part of the build system minimal package set, then afterwards koji reads what you have listed as BR. #003: Add a check section before %clean: ------------------ # Fedora Electronic Lab: Package Self Check %check %{__make} check ------------------ make check fails. Please notify upstream for correction. Since he is quite responsive maybe he can dump a new release. Please invite him to add himself as CC: or comaintainer of this package. running 'builder-search' test... subtest: case1...diff: regression/builder-search/case1.v: No such file or directory fail FAIL: builder3.pl #004: Preserve timestamps during make install add the following to your make install : INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" #005: use make macro everything %{__make} #006: No need to package the %docs twice. Both main package and subpackage should not own %doc README COPYING doc/html/ doc/latex/ #007: replace your %make install process : -------------------------- make prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \ bindir=%{buildroot}%{_bindir} \ libdir=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} \ includedir=%{buildroot}%{_includedir} \ mandir=%{buildroot}%{_mandir} \ install ------------------- by %{__make} INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} after you have added the following in %prep %{__sed} -i "s|^MYDOCDIR = |MYDOCDIR = \$(DESTDIR)|" doc/Makefile* #008: Both doc/html/ and doc/latex/ seem to be outputs of doxygen. Should not we just take doc/html (-devel package)? #009: doc/faq.html should be added to %doc of the main package #010: contents of %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ should be in %doc of the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251191] Review Request: glew - The OpenGL Extension Wrangler Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081929.n88JTfQd004502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251191 --- Comment #24 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-08 15:29:38 EDT --- It's in updates-testing. I think you need to request it to be added to the buildroot though to build with it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081935.n88JZMQn006096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #76 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-08 15:35:16 EDT --- I will only inform you, that I have submitted blender-2.49b on rawhode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] New: Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 Summary: Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssorce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtevent/libtevent.spec SRPM URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtevent/libtevent-0.9.8-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tevent is an event system based on the talloc memory management library. It is the core event system used in Samba. Tevent has support for many event types, including timers, signals, and the classic file descriptor events. Tevent also provide helpers to deal with asynchronous code providing the tevent_req (Tevent Request) functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081953.n88JrelM030066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 --- Comment #1 from Simo Sorce 2009-09-08 15:53:39 EDT --- libtevent is actually already available (with an older version) in Fedora as it is built out of the samba4 package. Plan is to stop building it as part of that package and make this new independent libtevent package instead. Prompted by upstream finally releasing a libtevent tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 19:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909081959.n88JxoA6031756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-08 15:59:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libvdpau Short Description: Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 20:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082004.n88K4R7d000329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-08 16:04:26 EDT --- - The compiler flags given in the Makefile should be replaced by %{optflags}, e.g. by adding sed -i 's/^\(BCC\|TCC\) =.*$/\1 = gcc %{optflags}/' Makefile to the %prep section. - The folder "www" contains the documentation of fossil. It's probably a good idea to add it to a -doc sub-package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 20:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082007.n88K7AlO014583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-08 16:07:09 EDT --- http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/bucardo/bucardo-4.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 20:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082008.n88K825v014685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-08 16:08:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360126) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360126) replica script to test bucardo. replica script to test bucardo. this script setup a master-master replication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 20:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 16:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082012.n88KCWtJ002294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-08 16:12:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > sed -i 's/^\(BCC\|TCC\) =.*$/\1 = gcc %{optflags}/' Makefile I just noticed that src/main.mk recognizes CFLAGS, so it's sufficient to replace %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} with %{__make} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082100.n88L0jdQ014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mnagy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnagy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082105.n88L5TVA026556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Adam Goode 2009-09-08 17:05:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lwp New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode nhorman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082101.n88L1Tm1025685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Adam Goode 2009-09-08 17:01:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mlton New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082106.n88L6JP3024893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Adam Goode 2009-09-08 17:06:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rpc2 New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode nhorman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446651] Review Request: rvm - RVM library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082106.n88L6iIR025443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Adam Goode 2009-09-08 17:06:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rvm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode nhorman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082134.n88LY6bk032217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082134.n88LYABh004560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 21:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082134.n88LY1NZ004522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | Bug 498248 depends on bug 501177, which changed state. Bug 501177 Summary: Enable support for missing datatypes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501177 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 22:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082243.n88MhIuv014347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 22:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: kwright at redhat.com ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Depends on: 520719 Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 520719 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #520719 +++ Created an attachment (id=359453) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359453) tomcatjss.spec First pass at tomcatjss package. --- Additional comment from mharmsen at redhat.com on 2009-09-01 19:04:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359454) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359454) tomcatjss SRPM --- Additional comment from dennis at ausil.us on 2009-09-01 19:28:11 EDT --- for future reference please dont post spec files and srpm as attachments to bugs. --- Additional comment from dennis at ausil.us on 2009-09-01 19:50:38 EDT --- rpm link gives some warnings rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result tomcatjss.src: W: strange-permission tomcatjss.spec 0600 tomcatjss.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tomcatjss-1.2.0/README tomcatjss.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/tomcatjss-1.2.0/LICENSE we should make sure the docs are not executable source is not available for download at the url in the spec fedora 8 has not been supported for some time now # Override the default 'pki_jdk' and 'pki_jre' on Fedora 8 platforms %{?fc8:%define pki_jdk java-devel >= 1.7.0} %{?fc8:%define pki_jre java >= 1.7.0} should be removed along with the pki_jdk and pki_jre macros /var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib/tomcatjss.jar in %files should be %{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib/tomcatjss.jar mkdir -p %{buildroot}/var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib cd %{buildroot}/var/lib/tomcat5/server/lib should be mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib cd %{buildroot}%{_sharedstatedir}/tomcat5/server/lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 22:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082253.n88Mr8jF016380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwright at redhat.com |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 23:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082301.n88N1fCq023621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-3.el5 |0.4.2-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 23:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082301.n88N10Aw023502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 19:00:58 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 22:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New: New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Summary: New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- First pass at osutil package for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 23:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082301.n88N1ZGf018775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 19:01:34 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 8 23:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 19:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909082301.n88N15IU018654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-3.fc10 |0.4.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 00:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090006.n8906kbS004483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #17 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-08 20:06:45 EDT --- perl-Math-Calc-Units * already in the epel-testing repos (tag: dist-5E-epel-testing) perl-Nagios-Plugin * still waiting for rel-eng to build it (trac#2173) /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 00:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 20:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New: First pass at pki-util package for Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: First pass at pki-util package for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Summary: First pass at pki-util package for Fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090147.n891lMbB023286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|First pass at pki-util |New Package for Dogtag |package for Fedora |PKI:pki-util -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090149.n891ngJ5018756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-08 21:49:41 EDT --- first pass at getting pki-util into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090148.n891mrv8018607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 21:48:52 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxde-icon-theme'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090149.n891nwIn023879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 21:49:57 EDT --- lxde-icon-theme-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxde-icon-theme'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090151.n891pkbf019997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 21:51:45 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090154.n891sbbk020559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6-4.fc11 |2.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090151.n891po8M020045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521993] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting pki-setup into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090154.n891sXFs025206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 21:54:32 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090154.n891sGJk025129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-08 21:54:15 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090154.n891sK6d025171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.33-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521996] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting pki-silent into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 01:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521995] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting pki-java-tools into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 03:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090302.n8932o29006733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-08 23:02:49 EDT --- Cc:ing myself on this bug, since this affects how fast LLVM 2.6 can be pushed to F-11. There is an upstream task here: http://bugs.opengtl.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=33 but no completion ETA yet (it's scheduled for 0.9.11). I'm testing revision 7 of our LLVM 2.5 package (-6 was Rawhide-only) that I will try and push straight to F-10 and F-11 stable so OpenGTL can be entered soon. Actually, what is our policy on a package that is not Rawhide-buildable? What happens if F-12 comes out before OpenGTL 0.9.11? The Clang Static Analyzer alone argues in favor of LLVM 2.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 03:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 23:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090348.n893m1sX015291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-09-08 23:48:00 EDT --- Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn327&r=327&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/fossil/fossil.spec SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/fossil-0.0-0.2.20090828225927.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 04:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090411.n894BoVW015364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #21 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-09 00:11:48 EDT --- Yah, the new build option with the workaround for PPC (--disable-fastcc) is not in 0.34 final, and I forgot to apply the patch. That will be sorted as soon as 0.35 comes out, so I guess there's no need to backport a patch only to save a day or two. In the meantime, here are the builds, with the offending patches disabled: Koji F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1663031 Koji F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1663002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 09:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 05:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] New: Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-jabber.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-jabber-0.7.93-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is jabber.el 0.8, a Jabber client for Emacs. Jabber (also known as XMPP) is an instant messaging system; see http://www.jabber.org for more information. Links to successful koji builds: Fedora 10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1664383 Fedora 11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1664411 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 09:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 05:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909090936.n899afj6020127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 10:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091011.n89ABFbW021683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-09-09 06:11:13 EDT --- Hi Alexey. Package looks fine as-is, closely following the perl spec template and with no obvious issues. I see you're needing a sponsor. What plans do you have for further contributions to Fedora, if any, or is your interest mainly as the module's author in getting the module included in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 10:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 06:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091026.n89AQlX4025542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-09 06:26:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pcb Short Description: An interactive printed circuit board editor New Branches: F-12 Owners:chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 11:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb - An interactive printed circuit board editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091106.n89B6nfT007659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Summary|Review Request: pcb |Review Request: pcb - An | |interactive printed circuit | |board editor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 11:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpx-viewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091128.n89BSmTU005028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Valent Turkovic 2009-09-09 07:28:46 EDT --- Any progress in packaging GPX Viewer? I compiled it manually with dependencies from Fedora 11 repos without problem, as you can see here: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/gpx-viewer/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 12:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091214.n89CEsqN015112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-09 08:14:52 EDT --- Please use standard naming for the summaries of the review requests: "Review Request: foo - an app that does bar" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 13:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091301.n89D1ULG001264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2009-09-09 09:01:28 EDT --- Here's a IMHO neater method of fixing the perl requires/provides that doesn't involve turning off the automatic dependency generator or requiring out-of-spec scripts: Index: automake.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/automake/devel/automake.spec,v retrieving revision 1.44 diff -r1.44 automake.spec 10,11d9 < Source1: filter-provides-automake.sh < Source2: filter-requires-automake.sh 22,25d19 < %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 < %define __find_provides %{SOURCE1} < %define __find_requires %{SOURCE2} < 37a32,37 > # Kludge to remove bogus Automake perl dependencies and provides > %global reqfilt /bin/sh -c "%{__perl_requires} | grep -Fv 'perl(Automake::'" > %define __perl_requires %{reqfilt} > %global provfilt /bin/sh -c "%{__perl_provides} | grep -Fv 'perl(Automake::'" > %define __perl_provides %{provfilt} > It also has the beneficial side effect of fixing this rpmlint warning: automake.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires-automake.sh 0775 automake.src: W: strange-permission filter-provides-automake.sh 0775 As for this: automake.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/automake-1.11/ansi2knr.c Since automake is itself a developer tool, this can safely be ignored. Which parts of automake are MIT licensed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091418.n89EIrdN013902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091418.n89EIdTn013856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com --- Comment #16 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:18:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-sfcc Short Description:Small Footprint CIM Client Library Runtime Libraries Owners: srini praveenp Branches: EPEL4 EPEL5 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091424.n89EOTFg015196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com --- Comment #8 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:24:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wsmancli Short Description:Command line interface for managing systems using the Web Services Management protocol Owners: srini Branches: F-10 F-11 EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091425.n89EPk3q023352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091424.n89EOdA6022752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091426.n89EQmu3023677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091425.n89EPZ0S023303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #31 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:25:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cim-schema Short Description: Common Information Model (CIM) Schema Owners: mdomsch vcrhonek srini praveenp Branches: EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC: emilyr at us.ibm.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091428.n89ESDnd016583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #17 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:28:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-sfcc Short Description:Small Footprint CIM Client Library Runtime Libraries Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-10 F-11 EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091426.n89EQaJY016274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:26:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:sblim-indication_helper Short Description: libraries for writing CMPI providers Owners: praveenp Branches:EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091433.n89EXLNB018024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-09 10:33:20 EDT --- Fossil uses copies of sqlite3.h and sqlite3.c that are bundled with the tarball. I fear it's necessary to remove them and use the development files from package sqlite-devel instead (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries). It's not too complicated to modify the sources. However, the code also references the internal sqlite function sqlite3StrICmp that is not available through libsqlite3. So it must probably be patched in somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091440.n89EelpS019748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com --- Comment #16 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:40:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openwsman Short Description:Web Services Management libraries Owners: srini Branches: F-10 F-11 EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091445.n89EjHLD020851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:40:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091440.n89EevcS019845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091445.n89Ej6dV020805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #15 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-09 10:45:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-network Short Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Network Providers Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 EPEL-4 EPEL-5 InitialCC: praveenp mdomsch srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091458.n89Ew5QF024316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #41 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-09 10:58:00 EDT --- Ping! Please take action so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 14:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091459.n89Exmqp032310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #34 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-09 10:59:45 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091522.n89FM4cJ030561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #35 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-09 11:22:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Created an attachment (id=356302) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356302) [details] > stock icons patch that also inherits Fedora > > Here is a version of the stock-icons.patch that also inherits Fedora. I'm > afraid it also inherits other icons and not only start-here. And it doesn't > really fix our problem, because if Fedora is not installed, there is no > start-here. We would need to also inherit Gnome. OK, I don't have a patience with this. Let's push -6 into Fedora so that we have at least something there. And we can then meditate about this issue in another bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] New: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Summary: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/sound-theme-fedora.spec srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/sound-theme-fedora-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A sound theme for Fedora. It is strongly based on the freedesktop sound theme and just does some small tweaks to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091530.n89FUSF7032696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #36 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-09 11:30:26 EDT --- Opened bug 522151 for EPEL-5, where we can play with resolving the issue. Currently, EPEL build just have OpenSOlaris icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091530.n89FUSL2032704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(metal3d at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-09 11:30:25 EDT --- So Patrice, would you modify your spec file (if there is something which needs fixing) and upload the new spec/srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091535.n89FZ0hr001350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-09 11:35:00 EDT --- spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/sound-theme-fedora.spec srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/sound-theme-fedora-1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm now with an 'upstream' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521730] Review Request: fossil - A distributed SCM with bug tracking and wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091531.n89FVMvQ000715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell 2009-09-09 11:31:21 EDT --- Both Fossil and SQLite were created by D. Richard Hipp. I'm not knowledgable enough about the SQLite or Fossil code base to feel comfortable maintaining a patch where my incompetence could destroy peoples data. I'll leave the SRPM up in case someone else is interested, but I'm closing this request. Thanks for your work and I'm sorry I wasted your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091543.n89Fh8gg010997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-09 11:43:06 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091548.n89Fm8Km005342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 488174, which changed state. Bug 488174 Summary: Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 15:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091548.n89Fm7e2005304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #37 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-09 11:48:05 EDT --- Build as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1665370 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091608.n89G8ige017303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:08:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091607.n89G7G9l017049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:07:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091609.n89G9lJe010917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:09:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:12:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091612.n89GCkFJ018337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:12:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091612.n89GCQ3X018265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-09 12:12:25 EDT --- ==== REVIEW === [+] source files match upstream: 4a67db39035533d3cf17b0f31355a42d7cd49270 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible: GPLv2+ and CC-BY [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1665688 [+] package installs properly. [-][1] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane: sound-theme-fedora = 1.0-2.fc12 ---- rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 sound-theme-freedesktop rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. === COMMENTS ==== 1) sound-theme-fedora.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/sounds/Fedora/stereo/tooltip-popup.disabled I suppose this is on purpose to silence the tooltip sound, correct? 2) AUTHORS not packaged and no parallel make (one might argue that both does not make sense for this package) Please comment on them and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091614.n89GE6g3011991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:14:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091611.n89GB69b011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:11:05 EDT --- You should be able to restore them yourself. Basically do a checkout of the last tag before it was dead.packaged, cvs rm -f dead.package, and check the new version back in. If you run into problems, let me know and I can manually do them from here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091618.n89GIKGD019623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-09 12:18:19 EDT --- Just noticed, /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html Conflicts with fedora-bookmarks, which is in the least very strongly discouraged, mind using something else, maybe /usr/share/bookmarks/education-bookmarks.html ? (which may or may not work out of the box, would have to check how browsers consume stuff in /usr/share/bookmarks) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091617.n89GHB24019343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:17:09 EDT --- There are not EPEL-4/EPEL-5 branches, you get those with EL-4/EL-5. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091617.n89GHj5r019552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-09 12:17:44 EDT --- > /usr/share/sounds/Fedora/stereo/tooltip-popup.disabled > I suppose this is on purpose to silence the tooltip sound, correct? Indeed. It seems impossible to silence both tooltips and rpmlint at the same time... rpmlint really has no business deciding if empty files are ok in my package or not. > AUTHORS not packaged and no parallel make (one might argue that both does > not make sense for this package) AUTHORS is not very interesting, but I'll add it when I build the package. That was just an oversight... Parallel make really is a bit of a snake oil thing to begin with. I am not going to install 3 files faster by doing it on 8 processors... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] New: Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Summary: Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpopelka at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/netplug.spec SRPM URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/netplug-1.2.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: Netplug is a daemon that manages network interfaces in response to link-level events such as cables being plugged in and out. When a cable is plugged into an interface, the netplug daemon brings that interface up. When the cable is unplugged, the daemon brings that interface back down. Up to now netplug has been part of net-tools package. See. Bug #521326 If the reviewer wants to install rebuilt netplug package, he needs to update net-tools to this version first. http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/net-tools-1.60-96.src.rpm This will be the first version of net-tools without netplug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091619.n89GJZUO013118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:19:33 EDT --- Matthew: I don't see you in the packager group. Is this your first package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091619.n89GJnDX019981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194420] Review Request: mlton, an optimizing compiler for Standard ML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091622.n89GMWkx020868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194420 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:22:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091620.n89GKcLk020538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:20:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189482] Review Request: pcb - An interactive printed circuit board editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091623.n89GNIhk013991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189482 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:23:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091621.n89GLPm2013786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:21:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446650] Review Request: lwp - LWP thread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091623.n89GNoDP021183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:23:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091626.n89GQChp021997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:26:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091627.n89GRBCu022148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:27:10 EDT --- This already appears to be done. What changes did you want to make here? Feel free to make a new request and set the flag if you have any changes to make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091630.n89GUkJf015573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-09 12:30:45 EDT --- Yes, it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446651] Review Request: rvm - RVM library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091627.n89GRfdV014989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:27:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446652] Review Request: rpc2 - RPC2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091630.n89GUbNH023002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:30:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091631.n89GVQKb023101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:31:25 EDT --- This package already has all those branches. Feel free to add a new request and reset the flag if you need any further changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091632.n89GWAdh023218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:32:09 EDT --- This package already has EL-4/EL-5 branches. Feel free to add a new request and reset the flag if you need anything further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091629.n89GTwfT022504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-09 12:29:56 EDT --- There are already EL-5/EL-4 branches for this package. We also cannot add email addresses to initialcc, only fedora account system names. Feel free to add another request and set the flag if you need anything changed here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091634.n89GYvwU023714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-09 12:34:56 EDT --- #001: Use %{__make}, %{__mkdir}, %{__rm} #002: rpmbuild will automatically zip man, info files so you don't have to do it manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091643.n89Gh6PB025696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 12:43:04 EDT --- nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091644.n89GiutE018223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 12:44:55 EDT --- nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091641.n89Gfu8P017854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-09 12:41:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > /usr/share/sounds/Fedora/stereo/tooltip-popup.disabled > > I suppose this is on purpose to silence the tooltip sound, correct? > > Indeed. It seems impossible to silence both tooltips and rpmlint at the same > time... rpmlint really has no business deciding if empty files are ok in my > package or not. rpmlint does not decide anything it just *helps* finding issues. > > AUTHORS not packaged and no parallel make (one might argue that both does > > not make sense for this package) > > AUTHORS is not very interesting, but I'll add it when I build the package. That > was just an oversight... OK. > Parallel make really is a bit of a snake oil thing to begin with. I am not > going to install 3 files faster by doing it on 8 processors... Yeah. => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091647.n89Gllpg026695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-09 12:47:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sound-theme-fedora Short Description: Sound theme for Fedora Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091649.n89Gn3XT019165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-09 12:49:02 EDT --- The source tarball can be found here: http://pki.fedoraproject.org/pki/sources/tomcatjss/ The src.rpm can be found here: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm The spec file: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091650.n89GogHY027462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-09 12:50:41 EDT --- So Matt needs sponsorship, is that right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 16:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091648.n89GmpWT026864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 17:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091725.n89HPHvx003685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-09 13:25:16 EDT --- I've just uploaded a newer version, which fixes a segfault I was seeing on 64-bit. Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.15-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091802.n89I2ea6005208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 14:02:38 EDT --- *** Bug 522046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091802.n89I2dui005181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 14:02:38 EDT --- This has already been submitted. It helps to check the lists of new and in-progress reviews at http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ Perhaps you could help with the existing review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508316 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091803.n89I3MjH005377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-09 14:03:21 EDT --- Well, I don't know how to use this package, however: * Summary --------------------------------------------------------- RackTables.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary RackTables --------------------------------------------------------- - On Fedora now we think that repeating the package's name in Summary is just redundant. * License - All scripts are under GPLv2 and its compat licenses. However this package also includes some "contents" and are under CC-BY-SA. I think showing contents' license is preferable, so I recommend to "GPLv2 and CC-BY-SA" as license tag. * About /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php: ---------------------------------------------------------- RackTables.noarch: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php RackTables.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php 0660 RackTables.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php ---------------------------------------------------------- - The latter 2 rpmlint errors (non-readable and zero-length) are perhaps by intention, however just to be clear would you explain if these are as you expect? - The first one rpmlint error should be fixed. All configuration files should be under %{_sysconfdir}. If this file needs to be under %{_datadir}/%{name}/inc, you should * Create %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} directory * Put secret.php under %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} * And create a symlink of %{_datadir}/%{name}/inc/secret.php which points to %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/secret.php. * spec file cleanup ----------------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir} ----------------------------------------------------------- - What is this line for? ! Note "%doc COPYING" entry in %files - first removes %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/%{name}-%{version} - then creates %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/%{name}-%{version} - and installs files specified by %doc to %buildroot%_defaultdocdir/%{name}-%{version} * %files - build.log says: ----------------------------------------------------------- 80 warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php ----------------------------------------------------------- In the spec file, this file is actually listed as twice: ----------------------------------------------------------- %files %attr(660,root,apache) %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/%{name}/inc/secret.php %{_datadir}/%{name}/* ----------------------------------------------------------- Please fix this so that this file is listed only once in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091825.n89IPHsZ010517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Component|Package Review |0xFFFF --- Comment #42 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-09 14:25:14 EDT --- The latest packate (0.7.6) is missing a "BuildRequires vala". Also, 0.7.7-beta has just been released by upstream (after 3 months from 0.7.6). Please, consider updating the package to this version unless it's buggy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091827.n89IRnPM017725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|0xFFFF |Package Review AssignedTo|cwickert at fedoraproject.org |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522199] New: Review Request: mingw-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522199 Summary: Review Request: mingw-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.ansel at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://michael-nas.datadrop.biz/mingw-wxWidgets.spec SRPM URL: http://michael-nas.datadrop.biz/mingw32-wxWidgets-2.8.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1663849 Description: wxWidgets is the C++ cross-platform GUI library, offering classes for all common GUI controls as well as a comprehensive set of helper classes for most common application tasks, ranging from networking to HTML display and image manipulation. This is my first package, so along with some serious guidance, I need an official sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522199] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091838.n89IcRcg020257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522199 Michael Ansel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw at lists.fedorapr | |oject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw-wxWidgets - C++ |mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ |cross-platform GUI library |cross-platform GUI library Alias| |mingw32-wxWidgets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522199] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091842.n89IglGn021353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522199 --- Comment #2 from Michael Ansel 2009-09-09 14:42:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360314) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360314) RPM rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522199] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091842.n89Ig1wo014234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522199 --- Comment #1 from Michael Ansel 2009-09-09 14:42:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360312) SRPM rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522199] Review Request: mingw32-wxWidgets - C++ cross-platform GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091843.n89IhK8K014521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522199 --- Comment #3 from Michael Ansel 2009-09-09 14:43:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360316) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360316) -static RPM rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522207] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting pki-common into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522204] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting dogtag-pki-common-ui into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522208] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting dogtag-pki-ca-ui into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 18:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting ca-ui into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091911.n89JBJc9027391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Sven Lankes 2009-09-09 15:11:16 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: rawhide/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 3717045e78de65c566a23bc4c8ee3edcf8b21a89 graphem-0.3.tar.gz [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f11/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091937.n89Jb53m001767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-09 15:37:03 EDT --- By the way it seems parallel make fails sometimes http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1665741 This build log shows that some needed header files are not correctly created before some source codes which try to "include" those header files. So either fixing Makefiles or removing parallel make is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091940.n89JeLv8028279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-09 15:40:20 EDT --- Nice package, I did some tweaks to the spec file: - Package is noarch - Rpmlint clean (as it gets) - Random cleanup - Ship cache dir in package - bzr subpackage - Add bzr to buildreq - Terje -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091941.n89JfnNG028680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-09 15:41:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360325) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360325) Improved etckeeper spec. The spec file in comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091948.n89Jmgb9004549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #43 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-09 15:48:40 EDT --- Bug reporter == upstream, so he knows best. Feng Yu, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091947.n89JlYeA029847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-09 15:47:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: graphem Short Description: Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker Owners: dmaphy Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 19:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909091958.n89JwcQ5032103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #44 from Feng Yu 2009-09-09 15:58:36 EDT --- I would like directly update to the 0.7.7 release which is coming very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 20:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092003.n89K3Fkw008159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #3 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-09 16:03:14 EDT --- All your changes seem good to me, thanks. Would you like to approve the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 20:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092010.n89KAOLT010318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #45 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-09 16:10:22 EDT --- Ok, meanwhile get yourself a Fedora account, tell me it's name and apply for the packager group in the account system: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 20:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092015.n89KF8PE004236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #46 from Feng Yu 2009-09-09 16:15:06 EDT --- Did that a minute ago, account name: fengyu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 20:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522239] New: Review Request: qdex - Romanian offline dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qdex - Romanian offline dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522239 Summary: Review Request: qdex - Romanian offline dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/qdex/qdex.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/qdex/qdex-9.09-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: qDex is an offline dictionary application that uses the database of the Romanian word definitions created and maintained by Dexonline.ro volunteers. Hello! I have a couple of problems with this package. 1. I've included only very few files from the package. Everything is packed inside the executable. The Readme file details the installation process so I've excluded it along with everything else (header files, html doc files which are included in the binary, qdbm and zlib programs). 2. qdex gets all its definitions from http://dexonline.ro. By default it downloads them to the current directory the first time it starts and any time the user asks for it. I had patched it so that it would put the db file (some 20MB) in /var/lib/qdex, but then only root could update the db. So I removed the patch and assumed that, since users will start qdex from the menu, the database will always stay/get updates in the current user's home and not have duplicates that way. So this is the dillema: leave it the way it is now or patch the program to remove the "manual update" button and make a separate -data package with the database, that way the database only gets updated by fedora. However, dexonline seems to be quite the active project, with more definitions added daily. I don't know if I should be mentioning this anymore, but I'm not yet in the packager group although I have found a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 20:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] New: Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Summary: Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/11/SRPMS/vdpauinfo-0.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092113.n89LDiaV019835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 17:13:42 EDT --- gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092114.n89LEKnT019942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #39 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-09 17:14:14 EDT --- So, I'm still working on trying to get this resolved. Turns out that Sun doesn't own the copyright on the IDL CFE code, that is owned by Progress Software. I've opened a dialog with Progress about the possibility of relicensing the IDL CFE bits that are being used in the TAO code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092120.n89LKMYG021300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New Package for Dogtag PKI: |New Package for Dogtag PKI: |ca-ui |ca --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-09 17:20:20 EDT --- changed title from ca-ui to ca per request from alee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:46:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092146.n89LkedY004376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092145.n89LjCjl004035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 17:45:11 EDT --- emacs-common-pmd-0.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-common-pmd-0.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092145.n89Ljq7E004222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 17:45:51 EDT --- Since there's nothing to actually review here, I'm marking this and the other tickets without specs or srpms or, well, anything as not being ready to review. Please clear the whiteboard if you actually have something you'd like for someone to look at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092148.n89Lm2Bk004581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #6 from Alexey Radkov 2009-09-09 17:48:01 EDT --- Hi Paul. i just wanted to contribute to my favourite Linux distribution with my own package which i created when i had not found a program with similar functionality elsewhere. i followed Fedora rules when i did the rpm. actually i would like to contribute to Fedora as much as my free time let. i have been using Red Hat Linux distributions since 1999 and have some experience with them. For instance i have created a bunch of ACPI scripts for my ASUS M50Vm and use them privately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092149.n89Ln3GV030317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 17:49:02 EDT --- This review ticket is assigned to kwright, but according to the account system that user is not a packager and so cannot do reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092146.n89Lk2I2029474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092146.n89LkKUE029646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092147.n89LlKld030045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092146.n89LkZ5R029757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092147.n89LlPaf030090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092146.n89Lkp8f029833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 21:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092147.n89LlDR5029994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 22:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092241.n89MfH5Y015148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 18:41:15 EDT --- Sorry for my late reply; the semester has started and now that the students are back I have much less free time. Everything looks good to me. The license tag is now correct, although I still can't fathom why someone would go to the trouble of using the proper license block in the code except for changing "Lesser" to "Library". %description looks fine and everything still builds OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 23:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522272] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mharmsen at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting symkey into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 23:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092303.n89N3vPC021864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 23:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092359.n89NxlIW003459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 19:59:46 EDT --- Unfortunately it's been over a month with no response. I'll go ahead and close these three review tickets if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 23:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092357.n89NvIjb003021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 19:57:16 EDT --- OK, finally things have calmed down from the new semester and I have some time to look at this. Note the spec URL above has a typo; s/,/./. Everything does build and it all looks pretty good to me. The only weird thing I see now is that you have a package "libkni3-doc" that installs files in /usr/share/doc/libkni3-docs. It seems that the name of the package and the name of the directory should match. Otherwise I think everything is OK. The above is minor, and while I think it would be good to fix it before the package is imported, I don't think there's any point in waiting for an updated package before I approve this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 9 23:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909092359.n89NxtWg009642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(callea.gaetano.an | |drea at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100020.n8A0KFP6015021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 20:20:14 EDT --- I was going to review this, but then I noticed that version 3 is out. Did you want to update this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100020.n8A0KjiD015114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #6 from Colin Coe 2009-09-09 20:20:44 EDT --- Hi and thank you for another detailed, constructive review. - Removed redundant 'RackTables' from the summary and description. - Changed license as suggested. - Put secret.php into /etc/RackTables (I've found that it doesn't have to be empty) and created symlink back to %{_datadir}/%{name}/inc. - Removed 'mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}' - Stopped listing inc/secret.php twice. [build at rpm02 ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/hp-rhel-5-x86_64/root/builddir/build/SPECS/RackTables.spec /var/lib/mock/hp-rhel-5-x86_64/result/*rpm RackTables.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php ../../etc/RackTables/secret.php RackTables.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.17.4-4 0.17.4-4.el5 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [build at rpm02 ~]$ Not sure how to address the 'dangling symlink' warning. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-4.src.rpm Thanks again CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100028.n8A0Se3b010072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 20:28:39 EDT --- The SRPM linked above is actually another copy of the spec file. Not much we can do with that, unfortunately. The versioning of this package is a bit odd. The dist tag should go at the very end except in one specific instance which is not the case here. So you should have "ovirt-node-1.0.2-0.20090728" followed by up to 16 characters of whatever, followed by "%{?dist}". Assuming that you really intend a pre-release snapshot of what will become 1.0.2. The guidelines relating to this start at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages. It may also be helpful to occasionally update your package, as I'm sure development has progressed beyond what you intended to submit above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100038.n8A0cFHO018036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 20:38:14 EDT --- I see you removed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker, but I can't find your name in the account system. It's not "davids" and a search on "Sommerseth" finds nothing. What's your FAS ID? I downloaded and unpacked the src.rpm linked above, but it doesn't seem to match the spec file linked above. Whenever you make a change to a package under review, you should increase Release:, generate a new package and update both that and the spec file. Otherwise it quickly becomes difficult for any prospective review to keep things straight. There are far more submissions than reviewers, so making it difficult for reviewers is not a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100043.n8A0hlPg013249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 20:43:45 EDT --- Ugh, I dropped a bit in the example above; it should be ovirt-node-1.0.2-0.1.20090728 (up to 16 chars) %{?dist} since prerelease packages need a release < 1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 00:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100050.n8A0o8CH014653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-09 20:50:07 EDT --- A couple of comments: %description doesn't actually say what the package does. The project history isn't really relevant for a package description. There's no instructions for duplicating the included tarball as required by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL This package has no dependencies at all. At the very least it would have to depend on php-common so that /usr/share/php is owned correctly. More likely it should depend on php itself. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#Other_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100318.n8A3IhSn015164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:18:43 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11,voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11,voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100318.n8A3Idix015132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:18:38 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10,voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10,voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100318.n8A3IYA9015099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:18:33 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10,voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10,voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100319.n8A3JWUN009862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:19:31 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5,voms-1.9.11-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5,voms-1.9.11-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100319.n8A3JMNV009809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:19:21 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4,voms-1.9.11-4.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4,voms-1.9.11-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100318.n8A3ImPs009752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:18:48 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11,voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11,voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100319.n8A3JbMp015458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:19:36 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5,voms-1.9.11-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5,voms-1.9.11-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100319.n8A3JRON015410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:19:26 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4,voms-1.9.11-4.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4,voms-1.9.11-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100348.n8A3m3YI021095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:48:02 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100344.n8A3is1O020150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:44:47 EDT --- eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100347.n8A3lHbv021009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-1.fc11 |1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100348.n8A3m8TH021132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100344.n8A3ix9R020198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100346.n8A3kWD2020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100348.n8A3mgAh016054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:48:41 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100348.n8A3mlXA016088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-1.fc10 |1.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100346.n8A3kSSF015360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:46:26 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 03:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100347.n8A3lCqS015500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-09 23:47:11 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100506.n8A56AnD003391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-10 01:06:08 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Generally I'd recommend using svn export instead of svn checkout as the latter generates .svn directories which aren't useful for a tarball release. Not a huge deal, of course. I'm not sure the test suite does much of anything. I guess it shows that the program doesn't die, but without a set of expected data it has nothing to compare the generated output against. Looks good to me. * source files match upstream (compared manually after following checkout instructions) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: gprof2dot = 1.0-0.1.20090901svn.fc12 = /usr/bin/env python * %check is present and the test run at least doesn't crash. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] New: Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Langauge Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Langauge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Summary: Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Langauge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-assamese-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-assamese-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for assamese language, bengali script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100528.n8A5S3J4001452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |lohit-assamese-fonts - Open |lohit-assamese-fonts - Open |Type Font for Assamese |Type Font for Assamese |Langauge |Language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] New: Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 Summary: Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-hindi-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for hindi language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] New: Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 Summary: Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-gujarati-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-gujarati-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for gujarati language, gujarati script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] New: Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Summary: Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-kannada-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-kannada-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for kannada language, kannada script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 05:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 01:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] New: Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 Summary: Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-bengali-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-bengali-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for bengali language, script . Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522341] New: =?utf-8?q?_Review_Rquest=EF=BC=9Akde4-windeco-a?= =?utf-8?q?urorae?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Rquest?kde4-windeco-aurorae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522341 Summary: Review Rquest?kde4-windeco-aurorae Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: i386 URL: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Aurorae+Theme+Eng ine?content=107158 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vvfancy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, vvfancy at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=360429) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360429) This is the spec file. Aurorae is a themeable window decoration for KWin. It supports theme files consisting of several SVG filesfor decoration and buttons. Themes can be installed and selected directly in the configuration module of KWin decorations. This theme engine requires KDE 4.3. Here is the SRPM package: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/1919042/kde4-windeco-aurorae-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100612.n8A6CLTZ016018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] New: Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Summary: Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-kashmiri-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-kashmiri-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Kashmiri language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] New: Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Summary: Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-konkani-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-konkani-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for konkani language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] New: Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Summary: Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Malayalam language, Malayalam script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] New: Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Summary: Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-marathi-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-marathi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Marathi language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] New: Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Summary: Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-maithili-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-maithili-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for maithili language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] New: Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Summary: Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-oriya-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-oriya-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Oriya language, Oriya script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] New: Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Summary: Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-nepali-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-nepali-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Nepali language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] New: Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Summary: Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-punjabi-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Punjabi language, Gurumukhi script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] New: Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Summary: Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-tamil-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Tamil language, Tamil script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] New: Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Summary: Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-sindhi-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-sindhi-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for sindhi language, Devanagari script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 06:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] New: Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Summary: Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: panemade at gmail.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/lohit-telugu-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lohit-telugu-fonts-2.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package contains open type fonts for Telugu language, Telugu script. Please note that this were part of lohit-fonts package previously, now lohit upstream releasing it as a separate tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 07:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100725.n8A7Pr3V031318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #40 from Johnny Willemsen 2009-09-10 03:25:47 EDT --- I contacted some IONA/Progress people this morning and added Tom on the cc, maybe that speeds up things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 07:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100735.n8A7Z3GU026821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 03:35:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-4.src.rpm Seems 404... By the way, while currently I cannot see your newest spec: > RackTables.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php ../../etc/RackTables/secret.php note that the directory name of "/usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php" is "/usr/share/RackTables/inc" and the relative path to "/etc/RackTables/secret.php" from there is "../../../../etc/RackTables/secret.php". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 07:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100736.n8A7aATF000823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #3 from Arun SAG 2009-09-10 03:36:07 EDT --- rpmlint on created rpm shows following warnings and errors: emacs-jabber.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/emacs-jabber.schemas emacs-jabber.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/libexec/xmppuri.sh emacs-jabber.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/jabber-init.el #1: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/libexec/xmppuri.sh Error can be removed by running 'sed -i 's/\r//' on xmppuri.sh #2: I don't know what you are doing with gconf schema is right or wrong please have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf #3: why we need jabber-init.el ? copying jabber-autoloads.el inside site-start.d/ works for me. (correct me if i am wrong) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 07:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100745.n8A7jjQC002782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 kashyap chamarthy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kchamart at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-10 03:45:43 EDT --- I ran a quick rpmlint on the binary rpm after building it on f12 aplha. rpmlint on SPEC - silent rpmlint on SRPM - silent rpmlint on binary RPM: [build at f12-alpha noarch]$ rpmlint -ivv pki-selinux-1.3.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm pki-selinux.noarch: I: checking pki-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre cp pki-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm pki-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun cp pki-selinux.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 07:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521240] Review Request: maven-plugin-bundle - Maven Bundle Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100749.n8A7nlTi003331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521240 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-10 03:49:46 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 08:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100819.n8A8JFuA009969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-10 04:19:14 EDT --- Fixed http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation-0-0.2.20090910svn.fc11.src.rpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 08:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909100830.n8A8Uk1C012451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #8 from Colin Coe 2009-09-10 04:30:44 EDT --- Oops, sorry. They're there now. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 09:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] New: Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-cobertura.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides the features of Cobertura within the Maven 2 environment. The report generated by this plugin is the result of executing the Cobertura tool against your compiled classes to help you determine how well the unit testing efforts have been, and can then be used to identify which parts of your Java program are lacking test coverage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101000.n8AA0tFO031866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-10 06:00:53 EDT --- I'm now a member of the packager group. Rich is my sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101017.n8AAHstj029951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Krzesimir Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |qdlacz at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-10 06:17:52 EDT --- This is a prereview, so it is not formal. And maybe in some places I'm not right - I'm trying to become a packager by doing informal prereviews. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Ok. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Ok. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Ok. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Fail - Game is named `Iter Vehemens ad Necem', but spec file says `Iter Vehemens ad Necum'. Same error in .desktop file. It would be good to have patch commented. `Patch0' rather should be used, instead of `Patch1' and `%patch0' instead of `%patch1' in `%prep'. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Ok. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Fail - license section in source code directs to LICENSE file, which states that source is released under GPLv2+, not GPL+. MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Fail/Ok - COPYING is included, but LICENSING file is not and this file is mentioned in source code. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Ok. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Ok. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Ok - builds on i586. MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. ??? - I didn't tested other architectures. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Ok. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Fail - during rpmbuild I got a warning: `warning: File listed twice: /var/games/ivan/ivan-highscore.scores' MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Well, this setgid is issue. But from what I can see, roguelikes are handled that way. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Fail - there are `$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' and `%{buildroot}' macros mixed. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Ok. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Ok. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Ok. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Ok. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Ok. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Ok? I'm not sure about `%{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/'. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Ok, at first glance. Any tools checking it? SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Ok. SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Omitted. SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Omitted. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Ok. SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Ok. SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A. SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A. SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101025.n8AAPDem005452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #9 from Colin Coe 2009-09-10 06:25:11 EDT --- Fixed dangling symlink. Not sure how I missed that, it was pretty obvious really. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-5.src.rpm Could I also trouble you to review BZ#489424? It's been assigned but there's not been much action. Thanks CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101028.n8AAS1rc032609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #6 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-10 06:27:59 EDT --- My prereview: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550#c4 And new upstream release of mm-common has arrived. Now it puts an example skeleton of build system (configure.ac, Makefile.ams, example sources) for mm modules in documentation. Should I make a separate package or put it into %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101052.n8AAqa9H011768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 06:52:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667723 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a7c92cea97262c64d52a2a6b6fe9f37576bd1669 lohit-hindi-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101052.n8AAqMRi011717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 06:52:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667719 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6b4bed57670b43679d59821d45e023af4a5545c3 lohit-bengali-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101052.n8AAqn0w011807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 06:52:48 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667725 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 511bb0ee47bf0730995702c377111d560f8f7f45 lohit-kannada-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101052.n8AAqQGQ005359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 06:52:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667721 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bd640f2783385686d0c5978ac2b9747d399a819b lohit-gujarati-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101051.n8AAp1fl005086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 06:51:00 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667717 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9c730047e032fd2d8720a754d1be037874b67f06 lohit-assamese-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 10:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101057.n8AAvAxN006677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #15 from Colin Coe 2009-09-10 06:57:08 EDT --- I'm having troubles with fedora-cvs. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here? --- [coec at rsim cvs]$ ssh-add Could not open a connection to your authentication agent. [coec at rsim cvs]$ exec ssh-agent bash [coec at rsim cvs]$ ssh-add Enter passphrase for /home/coec/.ssh/id_rsa: Identity added: /home/coec/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/coec/.ssh/id_rsa) [coec at rsim cvs]$ fedora-cvs vmpsd Checking out vmpsd from fedora CVS as coec: Permission denied (publickey). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) [coec at rsim cvs]$ [coec at rsim cvs]$ ls -la ~/.ssh total 20 drwx------. 2 coec coec 4096 2009-09-10 18:44 . drwx------. 38 coec coec 4096 2009-09-10 18:21 .. -r--------. 1 coec coec 1743 2009-09-10 18:44 id_rsa -rw-r--r--. 1 coec coec 402 2009-09-10 18:44 id_rsa.pub -rw-r--r--. 1 coec coec 642 2009-09-10 18:31 known_hosts --- CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1gLZ008022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1b4W007891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1ce2007916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1dOU007942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1fTE007998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1Ybv007809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1exU007968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1XQC007780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1hhp008047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1aEW007866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101101.n8AB1Z2L007835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101118.n8ABIwLK012068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 07:16:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667780 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4a0b8d1b58d8adfe6e0bc43e78a4da93973e956e lohit-marathi-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101116.n8ABGG0r011690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 07:16:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667785 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8e58bad4191f0685afdec036c8c34dfb9cc23ab8 lohit-konkani-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:15:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101115.n8ABFurL011320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 07:15:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667783 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2675f326ff5210cc56ffc456f374e31106f3ff7e lohit-kashmiri-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101116.n8ABGcj5011787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 07:16:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667789 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a5708cf2449019aabbbd112f0b0809425ec20387 lohit-maithili-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101118.n8ABIww0012054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 07:16:44 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667786 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e4f0cf50ab4a67436c35e523869901fbb07871c7 lohit-malayalam-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Consider adding conf file like other lohit series and set its priority to 67 and consider smc-meera fonts rule file changing to 66 from 90 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101123.n8ABNDZr014284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101122.n8ABMpRc014199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101125.n8ABPVRv014838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101125.n8ABPjVw014894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101126.n8ABQSH1020122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101125.n8ABPo44020051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101125.n8ABPe49019965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101125.n8ABPuow014994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 11:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101126.n8ABQKB2015249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 07:26:18 EDT --- Well, - Would you verify that you uploaded your ssh public key to FAS (Fedora Account System)? (if not please visit your FAS page) - And would you check if you have installed "fedora-package" rpm and execute $ fedora-packager-setup ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 12:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101228.n8ACSI4G002398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |needinfo?(dennis at ausil.us) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 08:28:16 EDT --- Dennis, are you going to take care of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 12:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101231.n8ACVtQD003575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #17 from Colin Coe 2009-09-10 08:31:53 EDT --- Thankyou for the pointer. I've done the CVS thing for vmpsd in F-10, F-11 and EL-5. There was a line in each saying 'Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file'. How do I do this? Is there a complete wiki page on all of this. I'm having trouble finding all the info in one spot. Thanks again CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 12:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101240.n8ACeiDY005537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2009-09-10 08:40:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Sorry for my late reply; the semester has started and now that the students are > back I have much less free time. No worries, this fits perfectly into my schedule. > Everything looks good to me. The license tag is now correct, although I still > can't fathom why someone would go to the trouble of using the proper license > block in the code except for changing "Lesser" to "Library". %description > looks fine and everything still builds OK. I guess the author just copied and pasted it from some older code when the license was still called "Lesser". Thank you and Bj?rn for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyhunspell Short Description: Python bindings for hunspell Owners: till Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 12:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101245.n8ACjXTX006429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 08:45:32 EDT --- Well, usually it depends on how the packager thinks of it, however if such documents are enough large compared to other parts, I recommend to create a seperate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 12:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101259.n8ACxUCu006885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 08:59:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > There was a line in each saying 'Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to > commit the new ./sources file'. How do I do this? This means that you have to do "cvs commit" after "make new-sources" or "make upload". However from cvs-extras-commits list you used "cvs-import.sh" and with this script it was done automatically. Now please build this package on koji, and for F-10/11/EL-5 please submit push requests on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101306.n8AD6vdR008870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2009-09-10 09:06:55 EDT --- OK then, if you're looking to make other contributions as time permits and get cvs access then I need to be convinced that you understand the packaging guidelines and can apply them properly. Unfortunately, producing RPMs for perl modules (which vary very little from module to module) doesn't demonstrate that knowledge very much. The best way to do it would be to look at some other packages in the review queue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&component=Package+Review&bug_status=NEW,ASSIGNED,NEEDINFO,MODIFIED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=notsubstring&value0-0-0=fedora-review) and do "unofficial" reviews of them. That way I can be convinced of your abilities and can be comfortable sponsoring you. Will you be able to do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:38:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:38:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] New: Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-om.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-om-0.20090414-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Oromo hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101344.n8ADioCC016744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:44:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667836 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 36dcebfdd98debb6f4124826b23e75c7f80cc3b4 lohit-sindhi-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101344.n8ADibKZ016665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:44:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667838 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c5cee59e78857aae467187bc288ade703d0610d0 lohit-oriya-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101344.n8ADiljt016708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:44:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667834 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5eba3c34ae0798bf65e271fe3da28bc05c9c49aa lohit-tamil-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101346.n8ADk2uU019628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #19 from Colin Coe 2009-09-10 09:46:01 EDT --- OK, build in koji and now attempting to push through dodhi. Stuck in the package name as it is not autocompleting and also saying 'invalid build'. The package name I'm giving is 'vmpsd-1.4.01-6.f10' (also tried 'vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc10') as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 I'm not deliberated tryig to be dense here. Thanks again for all of your help. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101344.n8ADiV5m018935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:44:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667842 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 542dd68f73ac0be9ba0b5c08857c0fee7b488f7a lohit-nepali-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101344.n8ADidE5018980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:44:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1667841 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 573e2283778543c137c03674465bcf5d01b75922 lohit-punjabi-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101352.n8ADqPmp021468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-10 09:52:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1668093 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e02addf9f8e3e9a3b5ae53e69bc57e860ba044c0 lohit-telugu-2.4.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 13:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101358.n8ADwJSD020222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 14:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101402.n8AE2aGj024149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Radkov 2009-09-10 10:02:35 EDT --- Ok, btw what you mean by unofficial? do i have to put my comments there? and i am going to vacation until Sep. 22, so i will be inaccessible until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 14:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101410.n8AEAtAC023517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth 2009-09-10 10:10:54 EDT --- What I mean by unofficial is that you can't actually approve packages until you're sponsored. But you can do everything else, such as make comments, run through the package review checklist, suggest changes etc. This is helpful (as long as your comments are appropriate) to the package submitter in that it should shorten the time to get their package approved once someone that *can* approve it takes a look at it. Have a good vacation, there's no hurry here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 14:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101422.n8AEMiNu026884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-10 10:22:43 EDT --- X please add a comment for the patch (the patch itself seems fine) X license seems to be ASL 2.0 for the plugin but parts contained (some .js files) are GPL v2 and GPL v2+. Please reflect this in the license field. X please add your real name to the changelog - naming fine - builds fine - %files fine - macros fine - Requires good - sources match upstream - rpmlint fine: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-cobertura.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-cobertura-javadoc-2.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 14:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101455.n8AEtbd3003600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-10 10:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X please add a comment for the patch (the patch itself seems fine) Fixed. > X license seems to be ASL 2.0 for the plugin but parts contained (some .js > files) are GPL v2 and GPL v2+. Please reflect this in the license field. Fixed. > X please add your real name to the changelog Fixed. > New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-cobertura.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 14:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101458.n8AEwcN6004171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-10 10:58:37 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 15:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] New: Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.51-1.src.rpm Description: This is the PDL interface to the PLplot graphics library. It is designed to be simple and light weight with a familiar 'perlish' Object Oriented interface. The interface consists of two levels. A low level interface which maps closely to the PLplot C interface, and a high level, object-oriented interface which is easier to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 15:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101533.n8AFXrJx012712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-10 11:33:52 EDT --- The plan is to stop injecting this into perl-PDL, but to remove plplot support from the main perl-PDL package and replace with this. Current method is causing problems with detecting up to date PDL-Graphics-PLplot packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 15:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101557.n8AFvkgH026044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #26 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-10 11:57:43 EDT --- New upstream release SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1668444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 15:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101557.n8AFvVun025966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #22 from srinivas 2009-09-10 11:57:27 EDT --- sblim-sfcb version 1.3.4 had the following rpmlint errors: rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-4.fc11.src.rpm sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-* sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderGz.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcHttpAdapter.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcIndCIMXMLHandler.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInternalProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicPAMAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcUtil.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcFileRepository.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProviderMem.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libcimcClientSfcbLocal.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcInteropServerProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCimXmlCodec.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcQualifierProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBasicAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcCertificateAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcClassProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcObjectImplSwapI32toP32.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcProfileProvider.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/sfcb/libsfcBrokerCore.so sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/sfcb sblim-sfcb.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name sfcb 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 21 warnings. Fixed these warnings and made some changes as suggested by Praveen in comment #13. Here's the rpmlint output of the modified packages: rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec sblim-sfcb.spec:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server sblim-sfcb.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 86) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [root at srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-6.fc11.src.rpm sblim-sfcb.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides cim-server sblim-sfcb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 34, tab: line 86) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [root at srini-f11 SPECS]# rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-sfcb-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The modified srpm and spec can be found at the following location: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcb/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 16:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101615.n8AGFWlI026225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 12:15:31 EDT --- Well, actually it seems you have done "make tag", but you have not built vmpsd with koji yet: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9159 Please actually build the package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Request_Builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 16:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101647.n8AGlU03007561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet. | |de) --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-10 12:47:28 EDT --- Let's see what we've got: $ rpmlint Downloads/dalston-* dalston.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/dalston-power-applet.desktop dalston.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/dalston-volume-applet.desktop 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Minor. Please mark the files %config (although it's not really necessary since changes will be saved in user's XDG_CONFIG_HOME.) OK - Source matches upstream source by md5 aeb4b0c644694a9833c92e1976fab6c6 OK - SourceURL valid OK - License tag correct: LGPLv2 and GPLv2+ OK - dropped redundant glib2-devel BR OK - dropped Requires(post): /bin/touch OK - %description ends with dot OK - timestamps preserved during %install OK - no libtool archives, so nothing to remove OK - README added to %doc OK - verbose make rules OK - configure is only run once Issues: FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets not sane: you are still updating icon cache although there are no icons. - autotools incompatibility from comment #15. Bug in gnome-autogen.sh - Makefile.am problem from comment #15: harmless (In reply to comment #23) > Mr. Robinson refuses to use this tarball > in compliance to the autotools' working principles. > > Or differently: If Mr. Robinson was using a "make dist" generated tarball or > was running the autotools in advance to building and was applying patches, all > the issues we currently are discussing would not be around. No hypothetical "what - if" please. There are no "make dist" generated tarballs and you said Peter uses *this one* incorrectly. Ether you come up with a patch or I'm going to approve this package regardless of the running autotools. IMO this is a minor issue here, so I'm not going to delay this review for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 16:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521913] Review Request: uxlaunch - A small and quick interface to start the Moblin Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101649.n8AGn8GL002876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521913 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 16:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101658.n8AGwQ9A010183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-10 12:58:24 EDT --- #001 Done #002 Done #003 Done. New upstream package released, vrq-1.0.58. #004 Done #005 Done #006 Done #007 Done #008 Done. Now using only doc/html in -devel #009 Done #010 Upstream has moved everything to %doc, and I have moved examples* to -devel. Upstream was notified of necessary changes, and vrq-1.0.58 was released. Now packaged: Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.58-1.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1668521 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1668543 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1668565 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101700.n8AH0UpM005196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 13:00:29 EDT --- For -5: ? Duplicate files - I noticed that 4 document files "COPYING LICENSE ChangeLog README" are installed under both /usr/share/RackTables and /usr/share/doc/RackTables-0.17.4 . Would you check if 4 document files under /usr/share/RackTables are needed? (If needed, you don't have to remove these files). * About %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/secret.php - The directory %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages, which must be owned by this package. - Is the permission/owner/group of this files okay with the current setting (i.e. 0644 permission with (root,root))? ! Note ---------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* ---------------------------------------------------------- can be simplified with ---------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/%{name}/ ---------------------------------------------------------- The latter form contains the directory %_datadir/%name and all files/directories/etc under %_datadir/%name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101718.n8AHIISx015263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521913] Review Request: uxlaunch - A small and quick interface to start the Moblin Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101717.n8AHH79K015084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521913 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-10 13:17:06 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 06972f151018e4610280e9a8368427de uxlaunch-0.23-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint uxlaunch-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2 OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 a7f77f2c42fd9897e1156fad4a60699f OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86-64 OK - MUST: no ExcludeArch OK - MUST: all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content OK - MUST: no large documentation files OK - MUST: files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: if scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: if the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - source URL valid OK - compiler flags honored OK - debuginfo complete Issues: HINT - dbus-glib-devel is redundant because of dbus-glib-devel FIX - Make is not verbose, although you set V=1 + make -j4 V=1 CC uxlaunch.c CC consolekit.c CC dbus.c CC desktop.c CC misc.c CC pam.c CC user.c CC xserver.c CC lib.c CC options.c LD uxlaunch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] Review Request: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101717.n8AHHmLt008714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|sound-theme-fedora - Sound |Review Request: |theme for Fedora |sound-theme-fedora - Sound | |theme for Fedora --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-10 13:17:47 EDT --- How did this get all the way to CVS without being assigned to anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101722.n8AHMY9O016260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-10 13:22:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-plugin-cobertura Short Description: Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101718.n8AHIwfb015476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rc040203 at freenet. | |de) | --- Comment #28 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-10 13:18:56 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #23) > > Mr. Robinson refuses to use this tarball > > in compliance to the autotools' working principles. > > > > Or differently: If Mr. Robinson was using a "make dist" generated tarball or > > was running the autotools in advance to building and was applying patches, all > > the issues we currently are discussing would not be around. > > No hypothetical "what - if" please. There are no "make dist" generated tarballs .. shipped by upstream. > and you said Peter uses *this one* incorrectly. Right. The upstream tarball is incomplete. > Ether you come up with a patch > or I'm going to approve this package regardless of the running autotools. Addressing this is trivial: He can run "make dist" in advance to building and either use this "make dist" generated tarball, or use diffs between the upstream tarball and his generated tarball. > IMO this is a minor issue here, That's the misunderstanding and mistake of people, who refuse to comprehend why running the autotools during builds is harmful. They are underestimating the amount of breakage changes may cause. It's worse with packages like this one, which apply autotool wrappers (intltool, gnome-autogen.sh etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101723.n8AHNnQU016458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-10 13:23:46 EDT --- Please assign this bug to someone who is actually reviewing this review ticket _formally_ , which must be a sponsor and set fedora-cvs flag properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101726.n8AHQ32j010564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 17:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522148] Review Request: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101735.n8AHZVTu019258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-10 13:35:30 EDT --- Hold off on this one for now. Not sure if I'll need it or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101815.n8AIF0K1027761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:14:59 EDT --- The pki-util.spec file can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util.spec The source rpm can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-util/pki-util-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Removing the NotReady flag from the Whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101819.n8AIJST9025090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:19:26 EDT --- The spec file can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-silent/pki-silent.spec The source rpm can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-silent/pki-silent-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Removing the NotReady flag from the Whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101825.n8AIP636031106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101826.n8AIQBN6031374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwright at redhat.com |dgilmore at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101832.n8AIWhpr000875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101832.n8AIW7Q8000783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:32:06 EDT --- The spec file can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup.spec The source rpm can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Removing the NotReady flag from the Whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101833.n8AIXSjx029212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-10 14:33:26 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101838.n8AIcUvK030788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:38:23 EDT --- The spec file can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools.spec The source rpm can be downloaded from: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Removing the NotReady flag from the Whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101843.n8AIh6h4000519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #19 from Till Maas 2009-09-10 14:43:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Please assign this bug to someone who is actually reviewing this > review ticket _formally_ , which must be a sponsor and set fedora-cvs > flag properly. Nobody is reviewing this, therefore I reset thes fedora-review flag, which you probably meant with fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101844.n8AIivAj004095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:44:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/osutil/osutil.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/osutil/osutil-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Operating System Utilities Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native operating system operations to Java programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101850.n8AIolSk002499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 Bug 503591 depends on bug 503592, which changed state. Bug 503592 Summary: Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101850.n8AIomsk002538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |503591 Bug 468230 depends on bug 468229, which changed state. Bug 468229 Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101847.n8AIltcv001848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #8 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-10 14:47:53 EDT --- I decided to split the package into two - main one and docs one. I noticed that README and skeleton are installed into /usr/share/doc/mm-common/ and rest, which are not normally installed (ChangeLog and COPYING) into /usr/share/doc/mm-common-0.7.3/. It doesn't look nice for me, but that probably is not a blocker, is it? spec: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common.spec srpm: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common-0.7.3-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint outputs: mm-common.spec: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. mm-common-0.7.3-1.fc11.src.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. mm-common-0.7.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm: mm-common.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt mm-common.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/mm-common-libstdc++.pc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. mm-common-docs-0.7.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm: mm-common-docs.noarch: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/skeleton/skeletonmm/private/.gitignore mm-common-docs.noarch: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/doc/reference/.gitignore mm-common-docs.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/autogen.sh mm-common-docs.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/skeleton/src/skeleton_method.defs mm-common-docs.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/skeleton/src/skeleton_enum.defs mm-common-docs.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/skeleton/src/skeleton_extra.defs mm-common-docs.noarch: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/build/.gitignore mm-common-docs.noarch: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/skeleton/.gitignore mm-common-docs.noarch: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/.gitignore mm-common-docs.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/mm-common/skeletonmm/autogen.sh R 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings. This many warns and errors in doc package are because of example skeleton of mm module. Oh, and I hope %changelog in spec file now is not important, so I'm not adding new entries to it, but changing them to new version and date instead, because the package did not hit Fedora Collection yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101851.n8AIpE8H008489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-10 14:51:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/symkey/symkey.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/symkey/symkey-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Symmetric Key Java Native Interface (JNI) package supplies various native symmetric key operations to Java programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 18:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909101858.n8AIwRGF010404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dgilmore at redhat.com |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 20:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102016.n8AKGgRY030308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-10 16:16:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 20:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522613] New: Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Summary: Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tornado/tornado.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tornado/tornado-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Tornado is an open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and and tools that power FriendFeed. The FriendFeed application is written using a web framework that looks a bit like web.py or Google's webapp, but with additional tools and optimizations to take advantage of the underlying non-blocking infrastructure. The framework is distinct from most mainstream web server frameworks (and certainly most Python frameworks) because it is non-blocking and reasonably fast. Because it is non-blocking and uses epoll, it can handle thousands of simultaneous standing connections, which means it is ideal for real-time web services. We built the web server specifically to handle FriendFeed's real-time features ? every active user of FriendFeed maintains an open connection to the FriendFeed servers Hello! $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/tornado-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpx-viewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102245.n8AMjEKg014790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-10 18:45:11 EDT --- I updated the package to 0.1.1 but I still have a build issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtsjU017853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:55:51 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtLt7005607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:55:20 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtZhS005735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:55:33 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtR7k005670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-1.fc10 |1.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtffq005790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.92-3.fc11 |4.92-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102256.n8AMuBEq005927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:56:10 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5, voms-1.9.11-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update voms-mysql-plugin voms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102256.n8AMuIBM005979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:56:17 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5, voms-1.9.11-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update voms-mysql-plugin voms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102254.n8AMsluv004950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:54:45 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4, voms-1.9.11-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update voms-mysql-plugin voms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0422 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102254.n8AMsqcI004998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 18:54:51 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4, voms-1.9.11-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update voms-mysql-plugin voms'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0422 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102255.n8AMtx4A017954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.03-1.fc10 |1.03-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 22:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102259.n8AMxs4Q007151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #17 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-10 18:59:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > There are not EPEL-4/EPEL-5 branches, you get those with EL-4/EL-5. ;) > > cvs done. Kevin, I get the following errors, when I tried to import this package to any of the branches. """ Access denied: praveenp is not in ACL for rpms/sblim-cmpi-network/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! """ Is this because I am not among the "Owners" for this package? If so, could you please add me to the list of owners for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 10 23:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909102305.n8AN5MVf009086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 --- Comment #10 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-10 19:05:20 EDT --- Was under the impression that EPEL-4 and EPEL-5 are different from EL-4 and EL-5. Currently everything is in place. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 00:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] New: Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Summary: Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kmymoney2-aqbanking/kmymoney2-aqbanking.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kmymoney2-aqbanking/kmymoney2-aqbanking-1.0-2.src.rpm Description: Online banking plugin for KMyMoney -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 00:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110013.n8B0DY3E026870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-10 20:13:33 EDT --- rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1669487 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 01:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110112.n8B1CK7L017695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-10 21:12:18 EDT --- A few comments, as I wait for this to build: Parallel make would really be nice. Is it not working? I note the firefox spec has some bizarre code to conditionally use a limited parallel make. The version does not seem correct. If upstream releases 0.8 (as their web pages indicate that they will) then you will need to use an epoch as 0.8 is less than 0.8a4. The proper way to do this is explained in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages: kompozer-0.8-0.1.a4 Then you can increment the '1' when you revise the package, changing the "a4" as necessary if upstream releases another alpha, beta, gamma, whatever version, without worrying about whether their suffix sorts. Then when 0.8 is actually released, you can use komopzer-0.8-1 Unfortunately the package has failed to build for me, in mock, on x86_64 rawhide: c++ -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -pedantic -fshort-wchar -pthread -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-h,libpipnss.so -o libpipnss.so md4.o nsClientAuthRemember.o nsPSMBackgroundThread.o nsSSLThread.o nsCertVerificationThread.o nsCipherInfo.o nsNSSCallbacks.o nsNSSComponent.o nsNSSIOLayer.o nsNSSModule.o nsSSLSocketProvider.o nsTLSSocketProvider.o nsSDR.o nsPK11TokenDB.o nsNSSCertificate.o nsPKCS12Blob.o nsNSSASN1Object.o nsKeygenHandler.o nsCrypto.o nsPKCS11Slot.o nsKeygenThread.o nsCMSSecureMessage.o nsCMS.o nsCertPicker.o nsCRLInfo.o nsNSSCertCache.o nsNSSCertHelper.o nsNSSCertificateDB.o nsNSSCertTrust.o nsNSSCertValidity.o nsOCSPResponder.o nsUsageArrayHelper.o nsCRLManager.o nsNSSShutDown.o nsNTLMAuthModule.o nsNSSEvent.o nsSmartCardMonitor.o nsSmartCardEvent.o nsStreamCipher.o nsKeyModule.o nsCertTree.o ../../../../dist/lib/libunicharutil_s.a -L../../../../dist/bin -lxpcom -lxpcom_core -L../../../../dist/bin -L/usr/lib64 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -L../../../../dist/bin -lmozjs -Wl,/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -lssl3 -lsmime3 -lnss3 -lcrmf -Wl,--version-script -Wl,/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/mozilla/build/unix/gnu-ld-scripts/components-version-script -Wl,-Bsymbolic -ldl -lm gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/obj-kompozer/security/manager/ssl/src' gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/obj-kompozer/security/manager/ssl' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/obj-kompozer/security/manager' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/obj-kompozer' make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/kompozer-0.8a4/obj-kompozer' RPM build errors: /usr/lib64: file not recognized: Is a directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I'm afraid I do not completely understand what's gone wrong. I think it's the "-Wl,/usr/lib64" there, as that passes /usr/lib64 directly to ld and I don't think there's any reason to pass a directory name without an option flag to ld. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 02:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110200.n8B20ngT019702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-10 22:00:47 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.11-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/auto-destdir-1.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 03:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110350.n8B3oq9W008740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |silas at sewell.ch --- Comment #1 from Silas Sewell 2009-09-10 23:50:51 EDT --- I wrote a spec for myself which includes the C module (for Python 2.5 users). I thought I might as well throw is up here just in case anyone else was interested. http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-tornado/python-tornado.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110414.n8B4Elb2025070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:14:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-bengali-fonts Short Description: Free Bengali Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110413.n8B4D37c024902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:13:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-assamese-fonts Short Description: Free Assamese Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110415.n8B4FPGw025422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:15:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-gujarati-fonts Short Description: Free Gujarati Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110416.n8B4G4ve013104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:16:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-hindi-fonts Short Description: Free Hindi Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110416.n8B4Gckp025660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:16:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-kannada-fonts Short Description: Free Kannada Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110418.n8B4IH2k025844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:18:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-konkani-fonts Short Description: Free Konkani Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110419.n8B4J3aR025916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:19:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-maithili-fonts Short Description: Free Maithili Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110417.n8B4HX3U025754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:17:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-kashmiri-fonts Short Description: Free Kashmiri Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110430.n8B4UWjG027975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110426.n8B4Qras027350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:26:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-malayalam-fonts Short Description: Free Malayalam Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110429.n8B4TQq4027585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110433.n8B4XF2C015693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110431.n8B4VmaG015529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110432.n8B4WJki028312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110434.n8B4YRqL028549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110433.n8B4XlFn028470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110435.n8B4Z7Yu028921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110434.n8B4YAEM015847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110439.n8B4dG4d029562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:39:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-punjabi-fonts Short Description: Free Punjabi Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110438.n8B4cM3i029469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:38:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-nepali-fonts Short Description: Free Nepali Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110440.n8B4eAtj029997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:40:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-telugu-fonts Short Description: Free Telugu Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110437.n8B4bpxf029369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:37:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-marathi-fonts Short Description: Free Marathi Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110438.n8B4cvPR016912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:38:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-oriya-fonts Short Description: Free Oriya Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110439.n8B4dfF8017004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 00:39:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lohit-tamil-fonts Short Description: Free Tamil Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 04:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522394] Review Request: maven-plugin-cobertura - Plugin providing the features of Cobertura within Maven In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110456.n8B4uW11020613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 00:56:31 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 05:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110520.n8B5KMVZ005310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #47 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-11 01:20:17 EDT --- FYI, installing the 0.7.6 package makes Firefox crash in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 05:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492019] Review Request: cfourcc - Change the FOURCC of an MPEG4 or DivX video. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110541.n8B5fll6008863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492019 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-11 01:41:45 EDT --- afairr, yanstadel isn't active in the fedoraproject -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 06:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110606.n8B66MPB013530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-11 02:06:21 EDT --- BTW it'd really be a little cleaner if there was a real makefile in the package, even if it only contains two lines to call generate.pe make is a standard interface people are used to and expect, and it will also give you parallelism when you have multiple files to process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 07:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110701.n8B711RT024450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 --- Comment #50 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-09-11 03:00:58 EDT --- Should we close this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 07:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110713.n8B7DqW3027376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 03:13:00 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 07:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110756.n8B7uxG4023508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(oglesbyzm at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 03:56:58 EDT --- Not sure whats wrong, we talked to dev BSDv3 is correct, he made the change in svn next version will be updated correctly. http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110800.n8B80HHK004199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-11 04:00:16 EDT --- SRPM has wrong address. Rebuild failed: /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.51-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110805.n8B85sYn005681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:05:52 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110815.n8B8FhcC027768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:13:38 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] New: Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A plugin to allow execution of system and Java programs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] New: Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin contains various small independent goals to assist with Maven build lifecycle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110821.n8B8Lsap009048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:21:53 EDT --- added (with i18n-team) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110829.n8B8TvEP030661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:29:42 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1000-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Text::Diff::Parser parses diff files and patches. It allows you to access the changes to a file in a standardized way, even if multiple patch formats are used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110842.n8B8gohu013308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:42:49 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110844.n8B8imYX001011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:44:47 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110847.n8B8lBKf001794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:47:10 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110848.n8B8mE7C014568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:48:12 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110849.n8B8nADW014686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:49:08 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110850.n8B8o1FA014794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:50:00 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110846.n8B8k4R4014201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:46:02 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110851.n8B8pGVW015499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:51:14 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110855.n8B8t7fD003910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:55:06 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110857.n8B8vPqR016449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:57:24 EDT --- added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 08:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110859.n8B8x9Jr004594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-11 04:59:07 EDT --- cvs admin done with: Package Name: lohit-sindhi-fonts Short Description: Free Sindhi Open Type Font Owners: pravins Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 09:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110912.n8B9CNQN020906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 05:12:22 EDT --- Nicolas, surely in next release of upstream i will do that, for all lohit language fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 09:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110927.n8B9RfQK024655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-11 05:27:39 EDT --- Hello Jos?, Thanks for volunteering to sponsor me! I've started work on a lot of different packages lately and I've also tried to review some, with varying degrees of success. Here are some links to reviews where I could use your guidance: telepathy-qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 qdex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522239 aspell-ro https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204 tornado https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 django-robots Review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 fossil Review(fail!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521730#c1 I have also updated the calibre package: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/calibre/calibre-0.6.11-1.fc11.src.rpm http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/calibre/calibre.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 09:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110947.n8B9ll5O028478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-11 05:47:46 EDT --- Thanks. Lohit distribution practices were a lot worse for years, so it's not an urgent thing to fix. I agree there's little harm in waiting to do it for next release Another cleanup would be to host the lohit release tarballs in the fedorahosted project, a fedorapeople space is not very professional on our part -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 10:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] New: Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Summary: Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge-0.5.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Skrooge is a personal finances manager, aiming at being simple and intuitive. It allows you to keep track of your expenses and incomes, categorize them, and build reports of them. This is my first package and i need an sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 10:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111004.n8BA46JW032066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111101.n8BB13sd011876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:01:02 EDT --- I have some lohit fixes in queue, once those will complete i will update other suggested things as well :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111114.n8BBEvRm014467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-11 07:14:53 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - OK, clean The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - ok The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines & perl specific guidelines. - ok The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK The spec file must be written in American English. - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - OK The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK Ldconfig in %post and %postun. - N/A Relocatable package and /usr prefix. - N/A A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK Each package must have a correct %clean section. - OK Each package must consistently use macros. - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. -OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. -OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. -OK Header files must be in a -devel package. -OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. -OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' . - N/A Library with .so suffix must be in -devel package. - N/A In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - N/A Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - N/A Gui application and desktop-file-install. - N/A Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK -koji build: ok, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1670457 -application testing: working as expected conclusion: Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111118.n8BBI3lm000399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #11 from Colin Coe 2009-09-11 07:18:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-6.src.rpm - Own /etc/RackTables/ - Fix duplicate files - Set ownership/mode of /etc/RackTables/secret.php correctly - Fix contrib/quickinstall.sh to write a valid /etc/RackTables/secret.php [coec at rsim SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/coec/rpmbuild/SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-6.fc11.src.rpm /home/coec/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/RackTables-0.17.4-6.fc11.noarch.rpm RackTables.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [coec at rsim SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111120.n8BBKA2N015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-11 07:20:07 EDT --- any progress on packaging latest version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111117.n8BBHBlw015231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111128.n8BBSQoK017846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com Depends on| |481068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBavwO004449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:56 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBanJc004239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:48 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBagbR004061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:41 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaji2004134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:44 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBawJV004483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:58 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaiPA004098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:43 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBamKr004206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:47 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBas2U004380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:53 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111137.n8BBb1Dr004550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:37:00 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaumR004416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:55 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaq37004312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:51 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaktj004171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:45 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111137.n8BBb4OS004587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:37:02 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaokU004275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:49 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111137.n8BBb0PN004517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:59 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111136.n8BBaren004347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-11 07:36:52 EDT --- completed build Thanks Parag and Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111143.n8BBhnaL005928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |488670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522777] New: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Summary: Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl-3.213-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides functions to support writing utilities that use the Verilog language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111145.n8BBjDJk006381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-11 07:45:12 EDT --- This package is supposed to obsolete perl-Verilog currently into the Fedora repositories. The reason behind this package review is that perl-Verilog does not conform to Fedora's package naming guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111152.n8BBqnCP022727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-11 07:52:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Matthew: I don't see you in the packager group. Is this your first package? Kevin, is there anything else which Matt or I need to do in order to get this package added to CVS? I *think* I've followed all the relevant rules from the wiki... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522355] Review Request: lohit-sindhi-fonts - Open Type Font for Sindhi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvqXC024260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522355 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522327] Review Request: lohit-hindi-fonts - Open Type Font for Hindi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvcS9023877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522327 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522352] Review Request: lohit-nepali-fonts - Open Type Font for Nepali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvmns024145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522352 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522353] Review Request: lohit-oriya-fonts - Open Type Font for Oriya Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvovv024183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522353 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522356] Review Request: lohit-tamil-fonts - Open Type Font for Tamil Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvsOF024299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522356 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522350] Review Request: lohit-marathi-fonts - Open Type Font for Marathi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvldh024107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522350 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522357] Review Request: lohit-telugu-fonts - Open Type Font for Telugu Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvt6b024335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522357 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522325] Review Request: lohit-bengali-fonts - Open Type Font for Bengali Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvaWm023804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522325 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522347] Review Request: lohit-konkani-fonts - Open Type Font for Konkani Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvgsT023992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522347 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522346] Review Request: lohit-kashmiri-fonts - Open Type Font for Kashmiri Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvfjM023953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522346 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522348] Review Request: lohit-maithili-fonts - Open Type Font for Maithili Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvito024030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522348 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522354] Review Request: lohit-punjabi-fonts - Open Type Font for Punjabi Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvpdw024219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522354 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522328] Review Request: lohit-kannada-fonts - Open Type Font for Kannada Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBveot023914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522328 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522324] Review Request: lohit-assamese-fonts - Open Type Font for Assamese Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvZ59023762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522324 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522326] Review Request: lohit-gujarati-fonts - Open Type Font for Gujarati Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvbhZ023841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522326 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 11:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522349] Review Request: lohit-malayalam-fonts - Open Type Font for Malayalam Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111157.n8BBvjbf024069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522349 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 12:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111227.n8BCRjtx014553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515832 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 12:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111227.n8BCRkMh014587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 12:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111227.n8BCRV4s030484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 12:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111243.n8BCha3r001175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-11 08:43:34 EDT --- sean, why you didn't put this package into F10/F11? It is builded correctly. F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1670918 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1670933 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111315.n8BDFSI0009038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 09:15:27 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vmpsd-1.4.01-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111315.n8BDFN2R025427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 09:15:20 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111315.n8BDFWD6025475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 09:15:31 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111318.n8BDIjkl009756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #24 from Colin Coe 2009-09-11 09:18:43 EDT --- Mostly done except for f12 which gives me this message: "vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc12 not tagged as an update candidate" Are upcoming Fedora releases treated differently? CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111350.n8BDoHP7017263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mathstuf at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-11 09:50:16 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. % rpmlint skrooge-*.rpm skrooge-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources skrooge-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libskgbasemodeler.so.0.5.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. >From IRC, the exit was discussed with upstream. Link to bug report or something else so the issue can be tracked? [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [XX] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. License is GPLv2+ from the headers of the source files. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NOTE: When you update the spec file, please rebuild the SRPM and bump the release. This helps reviewers know when the file was updated. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [XX] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). This is missing. [XX] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install, macro when removing extra .so files. Please use one or the other. Also change the one %{_libdir} to %{_kde4_libdir} and %{_kde4_docdir} instead of %{_kde4_sharedir}/doc. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [XX] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Please run desktop-file-validate on the skrooge.desktop file. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [OK] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. There are also %post and %postun scriptlets for the gnome-icon-cache. These are missing. %post: touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : %postun: if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111359.n8BDxWnq018934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 13:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111359.n8BDxdxY002538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111415.n8BEFSfu006416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-09-11 10:15:26 EDT --- REVIEW: :) rpmlint is silent php-pecl-sphinx.src: I: checking php-pecl-sphinx.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-sphinx-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. :) package name :) spec file name :) package must meet the Packaging Guidelines (PHP, ...) :) license approved (PHP) :) license match upstream :) no license bundled by upstream :) specfile legible, english, UTF8 :) sources math upstream d5bd7c00a8e036d7f82e98ebb0d9b210 sphinx-1.0.0.tgz :) build on F-11 x86_64 against PHP 5.3.1RC1 :) build on mock (F-11 i386) :) BR ok :) no locale :) no shared lib (php extension are not "real" shared lib) :) own all directories that it creates :) perms ok :) %clean section :) consistently use macros :) contain code :) no large doc :) run without %doc :) no -devel, .pc needed :) no GUI :) not own files or directories already owned by other packages :) %install, with rm -rf :) extension (un)registration ok (pecl list) :) final Requires /usr/bin/pecl libsphinxclient-0.0.1.so()(64bit) php(api) = 20090626 php(zend-abi) = 20090626 :) final provides php-pecl(sphinx) = 1.0.0 sphinx.so()(64bit) php-pecl-sphinx = 1.0.0-2.fc8 php-pecl-sphinx(x86-64) = 1.0.0-2.fc8 So : APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111419.n8BEJR1d023147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #8 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 10:19:26 EDT --- Updated to include ghc-X11 and ghc-utf8-string as deps, also stopped making up groups. http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar-0.9.2-3.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111426.n8BEQEMw008888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-11 10:26:13 EDT --- Oops, should be: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.51-2.fc11.src.rpm * Thu Sep 10 2009 Orion Poplawski 0.51-2 - Use arch specific dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111428.n8BESM3n025480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-11 10:28:21 EDT --- Thanks Remi, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-sphinx Short Description: PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111432.n8BEWbIi009990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Bug 520343 depends on bug 515832, which changed state. Bug 515832 Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111432.n8BEWZRq009960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-11 10:32:34 EDT --- Closing this bug as F-12/13 builds are already done. If F-11 or F-10 branches are also required, please write CVS request on this bug again following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111433.n8BEXih9026650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-11 10:33:43 EDT --- For now you don't have to submit push requests on bodhi for F-12. Packages rebuilt for F-12 are automatically pushed into rawhide tree next day. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111441.n8BEflLf012653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 10:41:46 EDT --- X let's put a version requirement on maven2-common-poms ? should we add versions to other BRs/Rs? X need changelog entries X need %post/%postun requires on jpackage-utils X LICENSE.txt and all other licensing text conflicts; remove LICENSE.txt and report upstream? - %files good - sources match upstream - naming good - macros fine - sources match - builds fine - rpmlint will be fine once changelog entries added: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm maven-plugin-exec.src: E: no-changelogname-tag $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-exec.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-exec $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-javadoc-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111446.n8BEkxCA029505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111503.n8BF39Xe016945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #6 from Gareth John 2009-09-11 11:03:08 EDT --- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review....OK * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines....OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption....OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines....OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines....OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license....OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc....OK * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English....OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.....OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.....?? * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture....OK * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line....N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense....OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden....N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun....N/A * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker....OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory....OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings....OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line....OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros....Each mention in description of {%name} could use the macro!!! * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content....OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity)....N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present....OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package....N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package....N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability)....N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package....N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}....N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built....OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation....OK * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time....OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8....OK Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111503.n8BF3LdO000777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111519.n8BFJJbk004234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:19:18 EDT --- X one file is under ASL 2.0 (everything else is MIT) so please update License to reflect X please use your full name and email address in %changelog :) X please add Requires(post) and postun on jpackage-utils - source matches upstream - macros good - builds fine - versioning good - %files fine - rpmlint fine: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-build-helper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-javadoc-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm -standard-dir-perm /usr/share/javadoc/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4/org 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111528.n8BFS4QX022243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2009-09-11 11:28:02 EDT --- Updated for 1.0.1; specfile is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard.spec and SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm I dropped the "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" as suggested in comment #9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111530.n8BFUjuW006838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-11 11:30:44 EDT --- These are updated packages with new myproxy version and also contain some corrections. Spec: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec SRPM: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111533.n8BFXm42007429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:33:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X let's put a version requirement on maven2-common-poms Fixed. > ? should we add versions to other BRs/Rs? No, it builds fine in koji. > X need changelog entries Fixed. > X need %post/%postun requires on jpackage-utils Fixed. > X LICENSE.txt and all other licensing text conflicts; remove LICENSE.txt and > report upstream? > > - %files good > - sources match upstream > - naming good > - macros fine > - sources match > - builds fine > - rpmlint will be fine once changelog entries added: > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm > maven-plugin-exec.src: E: no-changelogname-tag > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: no-documentation > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-exec > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-javadoc-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111538.n8BFcCMw024762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:38:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X one file is under ASL 2.0 (everything else is MIT) so please update License > to reflect Fixed. > X please use your full name and email address in %changelog :) Fixed :) > X please add Requires(post) and postun on jpackage-utils Fixed. > > - source matches upstream > - macros good > - builds fine > - versioning good > - %files fine > - rpmlint fine: > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: no-documentation > maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-build-helper > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-javadoc-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > -standard-dir-perm /usr/share/javadoc/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4/org 0775 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111539.n8BFdSZG025117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 11:39:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486570 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111543.n8BFhAj1026018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-11 11:43:09 EDT --- Upstream has released a new version, fixing a bug I reported. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111539.n8BFdTwV025163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lists at forevermore.net --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 11:39:27 EDT --- *** Bug 208064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111553.n8BFrlc3028785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:53:46 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111552.n8BFq73U011539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #26 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 11:52:04 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft is in rawhide now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111553.n8BFraFY011705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:53:35 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111556.n8BFufkx029626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:56:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-plugin-exec Short Description: Exec Maven Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111557.n8BFvv0H029790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:57:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-plugin-build-helper Short Description: Build Helper Maven Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522819] New: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: XMonad is a tiling manager written entirely in Haskell. The bluetilebranch is a fork of xmonad for the purposes of doing some custom tricks in bluetile, another tiling manager written entirely in Haskell and based on XMonad. This package contains the branch of the core XMonad libraries, and is necessary to build bluetile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522820] New: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: These are a fork of the contrib libraries for XMonad, necessary to build the bluetile window manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111601.n8BG1xHq013596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111604.n8BG4Hut013895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |522820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111601.n8BG1wVk013574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |522819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111604.n8BG4Id1013915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111605.n8BG5nIm031461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 --- Comment #31 from Jim Radford 2009-09-11 12:05:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dkim-milter New Branches: EL-5 Owners: radford -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] New: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Summary: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bluetile is a tiling window manager for X based on xmonad. Windows are arranged automatically to tile the screen without gaps or overlap, maximising screen use. Bluetile's focus lies on making the tiling paradigm easily accessible for users coming from traditional window managers by drawing on known conventions and making all features available using the mouse. It also tries to be usable 'out of the box', making configuration unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 16:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111606.n8BG6pZc014870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 17:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111726.n8BHQYJb017761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 17:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111738.n8BHcY6t020327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #51 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-11 13:38:32 EDT --- Since the review is done I think we could do so, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 17:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111757.n8BHvRd2024485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-11 13:57:25 EDT --- Ok, this has all been done (and for quite a while), but keep in mind it doesn't build yet -- cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be updated to newer versions first. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111814.n8BIE9V2028024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:14:08 EDT --- The description of this package is as follows: Selinux policies for the Pubic Key Infrastructure (PKI) components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111817.n8BIHXST011925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111816.n8BIGOMT011810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-11 14:16:23 EDT --- Hi, This all looks good, it is of course incredibly simple from a packaging point of view. $ rpmlint SPECS/php-email-address-validation.spec \ SRPMS/php-email-address-validation-0-0.2.20090910svn.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/php-email-address-validation-0-0.2.20090910svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. A mock build is fine. It clearly is BSD licensed but if you could encourage upstream to include a LICENSE file that would be good. The PHP guidelines mentioned above. Other Packages PHP addons which are neither PEAR nor PECL should require what makes sense (either a base PHP version or a php-api, php(zend-abi) as necessary). suggest to me that php should be a requirement and given this does not work with out php installed this makes perfect sense to me. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111828.n8BISi5p030928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:28:43 EDT --- Description: Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) setup scripts used to create and remove instances from Dogtag PKI deployments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111824.n8BIOrRV030126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:24:52 EDT --- Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag PKI Utility Framework is required by the following four Dogtag PKI subsystems: the Dogtag Certificate Authority the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, and the Dogtag Token Key Service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111825.n8BIPcJQ030589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111830.n8BIUted014579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:30:54 EDT --- Description: Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. These platform-independent PKI executables are used to help make Dogtag into a more complete and robust PKI solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111833.n8BIXAuF014961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:33:09 EDT --- Description: Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag PKI Common Framework User Interface contains the graphical user interface for the Dogtag PKI Common Framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111841.n8BIf0uU016636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:40:58 EDT --- Description: The Dogtag Silent Installer may be used to "automatically" configure the following Dogtag PKI subsystems in a non-graphical (batch) fashion including: the Dogtag Certificate Authority, the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager, the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, the Dogtag Registration Authority, the Dogtag Token Key Service, and/or the Dogtag Token Processing System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 18:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111848.n8BImMMq018322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-11 14:48:21 EDT --- Thanks Steve, - I will fire an email to upstream as to the license issue. - As for the php requirement, i thought adding php-common automatically pulling in php. I have now added the requirement. Updated spec & rpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11.src.rpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 19:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111909.n8BJ9KAr024365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Dan Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcbw at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Dan Williams 2009-09-11 15:09:16 EDT --- The hostapd openssl EAP-FAST patches already got upstreamed into openssl >= 0.9.8j (F11 and later). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428181 so those patches shouldn't be relevant anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 19:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111924.n8BJOrks027669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-11 15:24:52 EDT --- Ping? There are some small changes that need to be made, otherwise the package is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112014.n8BKEFHE005805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:14:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112018.n8BKIIAm022362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:18:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112017.n8BKHeBJ006705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:17:39 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112019.n8BKJ4j8022554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:19:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112020.n8BKKSo4023140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:20:26 EDT --- These are done by hand and occasionally it takes a bit for a human to find the time to run through the queue. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112024.n8BKOYt5008063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:24:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112023.n8BKNrOK023692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:23:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112027.n8BKRtMW009053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:27:53 EDT --- We need an ack from the current owner beforce branching their packages for EPEL. Have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112030.n8BKUC6L009706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:30:11 EDT --- The same issues apply here as in bug 233845. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112029.n8BKTjBf025160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:29:43 EDT --- The CVS request is missing an owner. The current owner of the package allows EPEL branches but requests that he be made a comaintainer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo Please submit a corrected CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:41:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112041.n8BKfS2i013073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #18 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-11 16:41:26 EDT --- Jan, I didn't push to F10/F11 because I'm simply not comfortable pushing updates to stable distros yet. Once I get a little more in swing with how packaging for Fedora works I'll consider pushing the packages to those distros, if they're even still in support then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112049.n8BKnLme030269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-11 16:49:20 EDT --- Ack! EPEL branch here is a-ok, so long as the requester takes ownership of the new branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 20:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112057.n8BKvZjt017563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:57:33 EDT --- Since Owners: is empty above, I'm stull not sure what to do. Matt, Chris has indicated that you should be the owner of the EPEL branch. If that's what you want, please submit a new CVS request with your FAS ID in the Owners: field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 21:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112107.n8BL7YAk003944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 21:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112107.n8BL7brk004014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Bug 521979 depends on bug 520719, which changed state. Bug 520719 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 22:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112206.n8BM6NYx004246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Fixed In Version| |0.17.1-4.fc11 Resolution|CANTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 22:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112211.n8BMB9M7005433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 18:11:07 EDT --- graphem-0.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/graphem-0.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 22:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112217.n8BMH6NT007232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 18:17:04 EDT --- The spec file has been updated to fix the issues noted above. Both the spec file and src.rpm file have been updated and posted to the location above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112304.n8BN41EJ022633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112304.n8BN4t0P005752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112319.n8BNJMfq026923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 19:19:21 EDT --- Added an entry to the changelog and posted the updated spec file and src rpm: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss.spec http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112324.n8BNOx5Q029303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:24:57 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.11-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112325.n8BNP4R1012708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc11 |1.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112328.n8BNSDGf030958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:11 EDT --- cobertura-1.9-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112328.n8BNSIPx031009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.9-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112329.n8BNT54U031230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA Bug 517764 depends on bug 517763, which changed state. Bug 517763 Summary: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112331.n8BNVMtN015309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc10 |3.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112331.n8BNVQ9t015351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc10 |3.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112328.n8BNSov7013848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:48 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10, voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112328.n8BNSt1T014061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:55 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10, voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112331.n8BNVHNr015262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:31:16 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11, voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112329.n8BNT0pV014213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112331.n8BNVBcW032743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:31:11 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11, voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112334.n8BNYBdV001007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:34:10 EDT --- gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521525] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_gfs-philostratos-fonts_-_?= =?utf-8?q?A_revival_of_the_=E2=80=9CGriechische_Antiqua=E2=80=9D_Greek_ty?= =?utf-8?q?peface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112334.n8BNYGjI001057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090902-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112336.n8BNaGdW017370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:36:15 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112335.n8BNZvBC017251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:35:56 EDT --- emacs-common-pmd-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112336.n8BNaM7Q017431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112340.n8BNeI4N004007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:40:17 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112340.n8BNeN2h004061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.4-1.fc11 |0.3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 23:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909112336.n8BNa3bL002148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 01:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120150.n8C1ooKF012316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-11 21:50:48 EDT --- sha256sum tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz c327f6efa2c2e36a8515d2420de7dc3307ce145574eaa28282ddfddc3ca2fd51 tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz c327f6efa2c2e36a8515d2420de7dc3307ce145574eaa28282ddfddc3ca2fd51 fedora/SOURCES/tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz source matches upstream builds fine in mock and koji scratch builds http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672226 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672206 rpmlint is quiet license is fine spec is clear approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 01:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522895] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dogtag pki is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. These platform-dependent PKI executables are used to help make Dogtag pki into a more complete and robust PKI solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 03:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Install-GithubMeta OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Module::Install::GithubMeta is a Module::Install extension to include GitHub (http://github.com) meta information in 'META.yml'. It automatically detects if the distribution directory is under 'git' version control and whether the 'origin' is a GitHub repository; if so, it will set the 'repository' and 'homepage' meta in 'META.yml' to the appropriate URLs for GitHub. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672451 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 03:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120344.n8C3iCH5017365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 23:44:12 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 03:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120344.n8C3i7aS032122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 23:44:03 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 04:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120449.n8C4nHLE009833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-12 00:49:16 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672577 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120500.n8C50VjZ011872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #37 from D Haley 2009-09-12 01:00:26 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-5.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.src.rpm Koji Builds: F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672567 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672572 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'` catmathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 mathgl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation tmp 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [makerpm at spiderbox SPECS]$ cat tmp Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-devel-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mathgl-doc-1.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-debuginfo-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm >- Please move the buildroot tag somewhere else from the middle of >BuildRequires. I prefer the order: BuildRoot, BuildRequires, Requires. Done. >- Devel package does not contain static libraries, remove them from the > summary. Done. >- The package needs to own > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ >instead of just > %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm Done >- Add COPYING, COPYRIGHT, NEWS, TODO. COPYRIGHT NEWS and TODO have been included. COPYING is not included as this is a GPLv3 licence, and conflicts with the source headers. >- License is GPLv2+ not GPLv3. I emailed upstream again, asking for clarification (fix headers or remove GPL3 licence). I still believe that GPL3 was the better option, given the presence of the COPYING file (gplv3 is compatible with gpl2, but not vice versa). Regardless, this has been to changed GPLv2+, as requested. I am aware of the wiki page that describes how to select the GPL version, however it doesn't cover this type of internal inconsistency. Diff: --- mathgl-1.9-4.spec 2009-08-15 18:23:08.000000000 +1000 +++ mathgl.spec 2009-09-12 14:38:14.000000000 +1000 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ %{!?octave_api:%global octave_api %(octave-config -p API_VERSION || echo 0)} Name: mathgl Version: 1.9 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Cross-platform library for making high-quality scientific graphics Summary(ru): MathGL - ??? ?????????? ??? ????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? -License: GPLv3 +License: GPLv2+ Group: Development/Libraries Url: http://mathgl.sourceforge.net Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tgz @@ -18,10 +18,7 @@ #Remove empty libmgl-wx from compilation Patch3: %{name}-no-mglwx.patch -Requires(post): info -Requires(preun): info - -Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api} +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # mandatory packages BuildRequires: gsl-devel libpng-devel libtool-ltdl-devel libtool @@ -30,13 +27,17 @@ # optional packages BuildRequires: freeglut-devel hdf5-devel libjpeg-devel libtiff-devel fltk-devel qt4-devel BuildRequires: wxGTK-devel giflib-devel octave-devel -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) #For autoreconf (required for patch1, libtool) BuildRequires: autoconf BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: libtool +Requires(post): info +Requires(preun): info + +Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api} + %description Mathgl is a cross-platform library for making high-quality scientific graphics. It provides fast data plotting and handling of large data @@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ opengl applications %package devel -Summary: Static libraries and header files for %{name} library +Summary: Libraries and header files for %{name} library Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ %setup -q #convert EOL encodings, maintaining timestames -for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README; do +for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README COPYRIGHT; do sed 's/\r//' $file > $file.new && \ touch -r $file $file.new && \ mv $file.new $file @@ -179,10 +180,10 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README +%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README COPYING COPYRIGHT NEWS TODO %{_libdir}/*.so.* %{_bindir}/mgl* -%{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm +%{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_prefix}/libexec/octave/packages/%{name}-1.9.0/ %{_datadir}/octave/packages/%{name}-1.9.0/ %{_infodir}/%{name}.*.gz @@ -198,6 +199,11 @@ %doc texinfo/docs/* %changelog +* Sat Sep 12 2009 1.9-5 +- Removed the word "static" from devel description, as doesn't have static +- Fonts now owned at datadir/name level +- Added COPYRIGHT NEWS and TODO + * Sat Aug 15 2009 1.9-4 - Fix octave installation method - Remove wx lib, which doesn't have meaningful code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120540.n8C5eDm1003561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 01:40:12 EDT --- ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120539.n8C5dmRl017894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 517197 depends on bug 517155, which changed state. Bug 517155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 01:39:46 EDT --- bos built this a while back: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129691 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120548.n8C5mlmT019369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:07:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:07:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120607.n8C67dcO007755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-12 02:07:38 EDT --- Hi, I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask submitter to go through 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join So You need to start reviewing other packages in http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html This will show you know packaging well and understands it. Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120619.n8C6J1Ut024290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #14 from Arun SAG 2009-09-12 02:19:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Hi, > Hi, > I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask > submitter to go through > 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess > 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > So You need to start reviewing other packages in > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html sure. > This will show you know packaging well and understands it. > > Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more > packages. yes, i tried submitting new packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 but it was closed as duplicate as i didn't check http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/REVIEW.html before submitting. I reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120626.n8C6QbX7010981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #29 from D Haley 2009-09-12 02:26:34 EDT --- SPEC URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro-2.rc1.spec SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672622 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672627 $ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'` givaro.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgivaro.so.0.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.0 givaro-devel.i386: W: no-documentation givaro-static.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ cat tmp Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-devel-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-static-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-debuginfo-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm changelog: * Sun Sep 12 2009 D Haley - 3.2.15-0.2.rc1 - Change to GPL+ from GPL2 per bugzilla comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517970] Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120655.n8C6tLHd015786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517970 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12 02:55:20 EDT --- Here is my formal review of your package. I didn't find any serious things to be fixed. Just Requires: gtk2 should be removed as BuildRequires: gtk2-devel is present. A wrapper script would be a nice addition but it's not a requirement to me. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/lingot-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - GPLv2+ according to the source header comments [+] MUST: The License field in spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File containing license text must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources must match the upstream source. md5 hash is e030c45af43e59521f6207ef5c9c5687 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms - builds in koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672632 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,... [X] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - Requires: gtk2 is redundant [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - BuildRequires: gettext present - %find_lang present - %files -f %{name}.lang used [.] MUST: Packages which store shared library files,... - no shared libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: Files must not appear more than once in %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: %clean section must contain rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no .pc files [.] MUST: .so files without suffix must go in a -devel package. - no shared libs [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package. - no devel subpackage [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - desktop file present - properly installed with desktop-file-validate - referenced svg file added to pixmaps folder [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - works as expected [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets necessary [.] SHOULD: subpackages should require the base package. - no subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 07:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120707.n8C77Ge8032588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #30 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12 03:07:14 EDT --- Sorry for the overlooked license ambiguity. Since this has been fixed, everything seems to be fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 07:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] New: Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 Summary: Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms at iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef-1.4.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: TNEF provides a way to unpack those pesky Microsoft MS-TNEF MIME attachments. It operates like tar in order to unpack any files which may have been put into the MS-TNEF attachment instead of being attached separately. Such files may have attachment names similar to winmail.dat ===== Note: This is a command line program. I have included a nautilus mimetype association, and a shell script so that you can right-click a winmail.dat TNEF file, and choose open, which starts the shell script, creates a dir with same name as the file, and extracts the contents of the archive to the directory. This is the first time I have done such integration, so reviewers please make suggestion as to any improvements that can be made. Cheers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 07:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120758.n8C7wfqk009387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2009-09-12 03:58:40 EDT --- ps. I noticed that the source is rather large; most of it is test TNEF files that I assume the test process will use and compare results against. Is it worth either getting rid of the tests, or activating them (if so any pointers on how that is done). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 07:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120758.n8C7w9C8026840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #38 from D Haley 2009-09-12 03:58:08 EDT --- Response from upstream: > On the still continuing package approval process for Fedora, the licencing issues have been re-raised. > > Namely, the copyright included with the mathGL spec is not internally consistent. > > The COPYING file is GPLv3, the COPYRIGHT file is GPLv2 and the source code is \"version 2 or any later\" > > Is it possible to clarify in the source repository, exactly which licence is intended? Yes, it should be GPL v.2 or later (as in source code) -- I forgot to change COPYRIGHT and COPYING :( I think that is now quite clear :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 08:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120801.n8C81vst027633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from D Haley 2009-09-12 04:01:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: givaro Short Description: C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations Owners: mycae Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: baz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120907.n8C97JSN021761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-12 05:07:18 EDT --- Matt, you should own this one I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:08:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120908.n8C98AG3021894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|478372 | Bug 505154 depends on bug 511078, which changed state. Bug 511078 Summary: Review Request: gdpc - A program for visualising molecular dynamics simulations data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511078 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 505154 depends on bug 513774, which changed state. Bug 513774 Summary: Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120908.n8C989ML021858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505154(FE-SCITECH) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #39 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-12 05:08:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > >- Add COPYING, COPYRIGHT, NEWS, TODO. > COPYRIGHT NEWS and TODO have been included. COPYING is not included as this is > a GPLv3 licence, and conflicts with the source headers. The source code headers say GPLv2+ so GPLv3 is valid in that category, so you can safely include it. Add it to %files. > >- License is GPLv2+ not GPLv3. > I emailed upstream again, asking for clarification (fix headers or remove GPL3 > licence). I still believe that GPL3 was the better option, given the presence > of the COPYING file (gplv3 is compatible with gpl2, but not vice versa). > Regardless, this has been to changed GPLv2+, as requested. > > I am aware of the wiki page that describes how to select the GPL version, > however it doesn't cover this type of internal inconsistency. The source code headers ALWAYS take precedence. You only look at the LICENSE file if there is no mention of the used license in the source code. ** Always post the new spec & srpm so the reviewer can check them. ** This time I'll trust your diff. The package has been APPROVED. Add LICENSE to the package before CVS import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120922.n8C9Mu9s010830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #40 from D Haley 2009-09-12 05:22:55 EDT --- > Always post the new spec & srpm so the reviewer can check them. Just to clarify : It is posted in the top of comment 37, just above the diff. The diff was for convenience. Anyway thanks for the review -- sorry it took so long to get it up to speed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120928.n8C9S8Pt025339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #10 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-09-12 05:28:07 EDT --- You might need the BuildRequires: libtool-ltdl since ayttm still uses libtool during the build process. You could safely remove it from the Requires if you have it there. Update: ayttm-0.6.0 is out. Get the sources from http://ayttm.sourceforge.net/files.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120923.n8C9NudT024660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #41 from D Haley 2009-09-12 05:23:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mathgl Short Description: Scientific plotting library Owners: mycae Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: baz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 09:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120936.n8C9aiaV013367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #11 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-09-12 05:36:43 EDT --- Also, for point 12 in comment 1, ayttm uses aspell now, which seems to be working fine on my F11 box provided you have aspell-devel to build the package and aspell and aspell-$LANG to run it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 10:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] New: Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Summary: Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stefan at seekline.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t.spec SRPM URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Hi all, The package pyicq-t already exists but I would like to become a co-maintainer. I already talked to the package maintainer and he said that it would be good to have a co-maintainer because he could need some support/help. I already created a dozen packages myself (but never released them to the public) and would like to contribute now. I'm using pyicq-t for a long time on my own servers. I added myself to the package and the owner accepted the watchcommits and watchbugzilla perms. I already did some changes to the package. The most import one is that the daemon shouldn't run as root. This is a security bug/fix! A new upstream release is out since August 24. And some minor changes. The thing left is a sponsor, who would be willing to sponsor me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 10:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121029.n8CATLSi003765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 10:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] New: Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Summary: Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e at arix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.arix.com/ftp/rpmz/specs/mod_gnutls.spec SRPM URL: http://www.arix.com/ftp/rpmz/src/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: mod_gnutls uses the GnuTLS library to provide SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 encryption for Apache HTTPD. It is similar to mod_ssl in purpose, but does not use OpenSSL. A primary benefit of using this module is the ability to configure multiple SSL certificates for a single IP-address/port combination (useful for securing virtual hosts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 10:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121053.n8CArw4j008259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #1 from Erick Calder 2009-09-12 06:53:57 EDT --- the page below: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join states: "You can add your package to this list by editing your review request bug and adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the 'Bug xyz blocks' field (where xyz is the bug number for your review request)." however, I don't see the 'Bug xyz blocks' field in this form. how am I to indicate I need sponsorship? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 11:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121137.n8CBbQcO015874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 11:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121159.n8CBxavU019545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-09-12 07:59:35 EDT --- Mel, how do we proceed here? Oh, and could you list this web page instead of the current welcome wiki page? https://fedorahosted.org/education Rex, I looked at astronomy-bookmarks and it's using the default-bookmarks.html with a conflict, too. Not sure how common this is or if other things would work out, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 12:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121211.n8CCBDjL007919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #22 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-09-12 08:11:11 EDT --- http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Sep 12 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-4 - Disabled junit tests because of bad coding in the tests themselves -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 12:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121246.n8CCkREj014165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-12 08:46:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtk-splitter Short Description: A file splitter Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 12:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121251.n8CCpB3I028896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #8 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) 2009-09-12 08:51:09 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Apologies for the delay. The updated spec and SRPM are: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync.spec http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync-0.43.0-3.fc11.src.rpm The main thing which remains unaddressed is the use of the test suite. I've put in place the code to run check, and on my local system this works fine. However, when submitted to koji, it doesn't run. I assume there is something about the test which fails on koji either in what it's trying to do, or its assumptions about how the build works, but I haven't yet been able to work out why. I will keep looking at this though! Instead of the explicit dep on -libs, I've put COPYING in both packages - I think it's nicer, and rpmlint doesn't like the explicit dep anyway. I've also checked that the config isn't used by the library, so I'm sure that's in the right place. The other problems you raised should now be addressed. Many, many thanks again for your work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 13:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121314.n8CDE4QB000539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12 09:14:02 EDT --- Some of quick comments: - the license tag must be BSD - BuildRequires: ghc is redundant - add braces to all macros, i.e. replace %_datadir/%name-%version/* by %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 13:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121352.n8CDqVmQ006740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522888 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERp93031072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Bug 460974 depends on bug 426752, which changed state. Bug 426752 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERobu031039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 426752, which changed state. Bug 426752 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERmj1030994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:27:44 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121436.n8CEafQL014364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:36:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - BuildRequires: ghc is redundant Is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121439.n8CEdC9b000469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:39:11 EDT --- I feel slightly uncomfortable having "two" xmonad's in fedora but I will do some testing to see how different they are: I wish the libraries of these two projects might merge at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121445.n8CEjHI4015922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #4 from Arun SAG 2009-09-12 10:45:16 EDT --- New version of jabber.el is available (version 0.8) http://sourceforge.net/projects/emacs-jabber/files/ . Can i start packaging it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121455.n8CEtjFm017548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tjarls at gmail.com) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-12 10:55:44 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121455.n8CEt2GJ017379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bowe at redhat.com) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-12 10:54:59 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 15:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121508.n8CF8Qwu005388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12 11:08:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is it? As far as I can see, it's automatically added as a dependency of ghc-gtk-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 15:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121547.n8CFlLgd025848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #18 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-12 11:47:19 EDT --- Update: Both modules are now available in EPEL-5 Testing repos. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 15:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121552.n8CFq29j026669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-12 11:52:00 EDT --- For -6: * %_docdir - Again I see this line: ----------------------------------------------------------- 35 mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/%{name} ----------------------------------------------------------- * Some more cleanup ----------------------------------------------------------- 24 %setup -qn %{name}-%{version} ----------------------------------------------------------- - This can be simplified as "%setup -q" because the default directory of %setup is "%{name}-%{version}" ----------------------------------------------------------- 39 cp -a ../%{name}-%{version}/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} ----------------------------------------------------------- - This can be simplified as ----------------------------------------------------------- cp -a * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} ----------------------------------------------------------- because at this stage the working directory is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} * About quickinstall.sh - Maybe it is good to check the id (of this script) in this script because at least this script needs the previledge to write to /usr/share/RackTables/inc/secret.php . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121716.n8CHGTod026651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-12 13:16:28 EDT --- the devel subpackage should not contain these scriptlets as it does not contain any shared libraries %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Please update the spec accordingly for approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121752.n8CHqf2W015221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:52:40 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121752.n8CHqjfc015260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121751.n8CHpKUT014813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-2.fc10 |1.0.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121753.n8CHr1XG015382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-12 13:53:00 EDT --- It's a haskell package, and ghc is not included by default in Fedora (yet). It's so fundamental to all haskell packages that a little redundancy won't hurt. Especially considering that the gtk BR could go away. In some cases, it's also necessary to specify a particular version of GHC, which the gtk package might not do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121754.n8CHseJR001053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:54:37 EDT --- perl-SNMP-Info-2.01-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121751.n8CHpFCY032617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:51:14 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121754.n8CHsII0000969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-1.fc11 |0.5.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121754.n8CHsjAu001090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-3.fc8 |2.01-1.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121755.n8CHtcAP016576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:55:35 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121754.n8CHsEKM015912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 13:54:13 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121754.n8CHsxRi016066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-12 13:54:58 EDT --- All good APPROVED Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121757.n8CHvmEY002118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthias Saou 2009-09-12 13:57:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spawn-fcgi Short Description: Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes Owners: thias Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121800.n8CI0uJM017792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Matthias Saou 2009-09-12 14:00:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synergy-plus Short Description: Mouse and keyboard sharing utility Owners: thias Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121807.n8CI7hwE004201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-12 14:07:42 EDT --- Hi, $ rpmlint SPECS/globus-authz-callout-error.spec \ SRPMS/globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/x86_64/globus-authz-callout-error-* globus-authz-callout-error-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-authz-callout-error/globus-authz-callout-error-libs/libglobus-authz-callout-error globus-authz-callout-error-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. should that first one be fixed. Other than that a trivial package with respect to the globus guidelines so looking good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121836.n8CIaTWc024026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-12 14:36:26 EDT --- Some small things, I think we're good to go: 1. If possible, provide full URL for Source0 (for source verification, etc... 2. why include all of: %doc ... GPL-2 GPL-3 LGPL-3 ? if this is GPL-3 (per License tag), then that's all that's needed here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121838.n8CIceRS009267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-12 14:38:39 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1673826 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121839.n8CIdhcH024340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-12 14:39:42 EDT --- Well, for 0.7.3-1 * Timestamps - Now this package installs more files, keeping timestamps on installed files as much as possible is preferable. Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="insatll -p" CPPROG="cp -p" ------------------------------------------------------ to keep timestamps on installed files. - Usually adding INSTALL="insatll -p" works for makefiles based on Makefiles generated from recent autotools - However this package also uses "install-sh" to install files. For this, adding CPPROG="cp -p" will (usually) keep timestamps on installed files. * redundant %doc - Files under %{_mandir} are automatically marked as %doc. - Also files under %{_docdir} are automatically marked as %doc. * Directory ownership issue - This is actually under discussion, however this package installs some files under %{_datadir}/aclocal/ and currently owned by "automake" rpm. So adding "Requires: automake" to this package is preferable to satisfy directory ownership issue. - -docs package installs some files under %{_docdir}/%{name}/, however the directory %{_docdir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages, which should be owned by "this" (i.e. mm-common-docs) package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Forgetting_to_Include_a_Toplevel_Directory ! %changelog - I recommend to add entries into %changelog even this is still under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121845.n8CIjG1V010494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-12 14:45:15 EDT --- $ rpmlint *.src.rpm x86_64/*.rpm kdevplatform.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 20) kdevplatform.x86_64: E: no-binary kdevplatform-debuginfo.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/kdevplatform-0.9.93/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/shell/krossdistributedversioncontrol.moc kdevplatform-debuginfo.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/kdevplatform-0.9.93/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/problemreporter/problemhighlighter.moc kdevplatform-debuginfo.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/src/debug/kdevplatform-0.9.93/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/plugins/projectmanagerview/projectproxymodel.moc kdevplatform-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation kdevplatform-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. Mostly harmless upstream source matches $ md5sum *.bz2 ab9a9cf4fa22a2eba7eba7cc1fbd701e kdevplatform-0.9.93.tar.bz2 spec generally good, macro usage consistent. One minor issue, missing icon scriptlets, but that can be addressed post-review. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 18:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121848.n8CImlPA025830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-12 14:48:46 EDT --- I won't consider items from comment #24 blockers, can be addressed post-review. Otherwise, spec looks good, macro usage consistent. APPROVED. p.s. thanks for bearing with me, and sorry for the extended review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121915.n8CJFILD030753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121918.n8CJI2SP015698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-12 15:18:01 EDT --- Removed ldconfig post, postun for -devel package. Updated: Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.58-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1673764 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1673831 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1673844 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121925.n8CJPwA1016983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-12 15:25:57 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510921] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_adf-accanthis-fonts_-_A_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9Cmodernized=E2=80=9D_garaldic_serif_typeface?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121937.n8CJbnIf001657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510921 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121951.n8CJp7Dr021169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-12 15:51:06 EDT --- The review has not started yet, for starters the package don't build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674016 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1674016&name=build.log Fix that (hint: python-devel) and I will do a formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 19:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121952.n8CJqBeu021341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-12 15:52:10 EDT --- Well, - actually even "%post{,un} -p /sbin/ldconfig" is also unneeded for this package because no libraries are installed under default library search paths (some binaries are installed under %_libdir/%name but not %_libdir) - By the way build.log shows lots of warnings like ------------------------------------------------------------- Generating annotated compound ish: epstopdf: command not found Error: Problems running epstopdf. Check your TeX installation! sh: epstopdf: command not found Error: Problems running epstopdf. Check your TeX installation! ------------------------------------------------------------- Would you check if BRs are correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 20:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122005.n8CK5hFG023576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Warren Togami 2009-09-12 16:05:42 EDT --- I'm canceling this for inclusion in Fedora for now. It slows down spamassassin substantially and doesn't classify mail well enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 20:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122017.n8CKHVIC025558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 --- Comment #2 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-12 16:17:30 EDT --- Now that libtelnet is in F12, I tried a scratch build on Koji. That made it clear that I forgot some build requires on packages I had installed on my local machine (Koji is damn handy that way). Updated to 0.01-3 with the build requires added. Verified it works on Koji now. Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-3.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674042 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 20:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122024.n8CKOxf2009451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 22:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122202.n8CM2ptX030378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #5 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-12 18:02:50 EDT --- Ok this one works: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/etckeeper.spec http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/etckeeper-0.40-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 23:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] New: Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Summary: Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-json.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-json-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: LuaJSON is a customizable JSON decoder/encoder, using LPEG for parsing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 23:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] New: Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Summary: Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-lunit.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Lunit is a unit testing framework for lua, written in lua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 23:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122314.n8CNE3On020076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522980 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 23:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909122314.n8CNE2Jm020042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |522979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 01:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909130119.n8D1JDZV005623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #13 from Colin Coe 2009-09-12 21:19:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-7.src.rpm - Simplify setup - Step making docdir/name - Simplify copy - Make contrin/quickinsta.sh quit unless it's run by root rpmlint /home/coec/rpmbuild/SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11.src.rpm /home/coec/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11.noarch.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/RackTables.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 02:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909130207.n8D27YfN031165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 02:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] New: Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Summary: Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: e at arix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://arix.com/rpmz/specs/dyndns.spec SRPM URL: ftp://arix.com/rpmz/src/dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This utility implements a client for the free afraid.org dynamic DNS service. A cron job is set up to check whether the external IP address has changed, and when it does, connects to afraid.org and updates the DNS entries of all the domains of the given account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 08:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 04:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909130805.n8D856bf025575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #63 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-13 04:05:00 EDT --- Hmm, isn't it better to have some awesome2 than nothing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 09:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909130953.n8D9rIEN012675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 10:46:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131046.n8DAkjli005778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-13 06:46:43 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 10:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131047.n8DAlSev005862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-13 06:47:28 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 11:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131150.n8DBoWPJ017702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 11:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131149.n8DBnO92017190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dtimms at iinet.net.au Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 12:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131217.n8DCHIWx005874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-13 08:17:16 EDT --- @Mamoru Tasaka (Comment #8): --- | some binaries are installed under | %_libdir/%name but not %_libdir \-- In 'man ld-linux', it states that the dynamic linker/loader also searches /usr/lib if it doesn't find the library in /lib. Isn't it not recursive? --- | Error: Problems running epstopdf. Check your TeX installation! \-- Upstream has reported that the .tex files have been generated with doyxgen, and thus has no control over it. We are not packaging .tex files in the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 12:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131226.n8DCQZUX024038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-13 08:26:33 EDT --- A couple of comments after a cursory look: 1. Name: ueagle-atm-firmware4 <- where does it come from? The project name is uEagle-ATM and the tarball name is ueagle4-data. 2. Summary is inconsistent with description (Eagle IV in summary vs. Eagle I-III in description). 3. Missing Requires: udev for ownership of /lib/firmware. 4. Unowned directory /lib/firmware/ueagle-atm. 5. Inconsistent macro usage (%{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 6. cp -rf -p <- surely cp -p is enough? 7. A part of the licence text looks fishy: [...] | USER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT THE PURCHASE OR USE OF THIS SOFTWARE WILL | NOT CREATE OR GIVE GROUNDS FOR A | LICENSE BY IMPLICATION, ESTOPPEL, OR OTHERWISE IN ANY INTELLECTUAL | PROPERTY RIGHTS (PATENT, COPYRIGHT, TRADE SECRET, MASK WORK, OR OTHER | PROPRIETARY RIGHT) EMBODIED IN ANY OTHER IKANOS HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE | EITHER SOLELY OR IN COMBINATION WITH THIS SOFTWARE. [...] and should be vetted by Fedora Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 12:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131235.n8DCZ1Nw025345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-13 08:35:00 EDT --- First of all, thank you! New spec and srpm uploaded: Spec Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge.spec SRPM Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/skrooge*-0.5.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm skrooge-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libskgbasemodeler.so.0.5.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Bug is filed: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207246 The debuginfo-without-sources is right now workaround'd with: sed -i 's,SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-Wall" ),SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-Wall ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS}"),g' CMakeLists.txt Bug is filed: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207249 [thomas at tusdell SRPMS]$ koji build --scratch dist-f12 skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:03:40 4.27 MiB 19.85 KiB/sec Created task: 1674792 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674792 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1674792 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1674796 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, i686): free 1674793 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1674795 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1674794 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1674796 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, i686): free -> open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1674794 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 1674796 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, i686): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 1674793 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 1674795 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 1674792 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1674792 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 12:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131247.n8DClWD5027826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(rpm at greysector.ne | |t) | --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-13 08:47:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > re: comment 2 -- your kernel doesn't have support for /dev/rfill. I assure you > that it works fine here. :-) kernel-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 here. Which one do I need to have /dev/rfkill? > re: comment 1 -- I think rfkill.c would be fine if the COPYING file was a bit > more clear. But the rfkill.h having come from the kernel throws the whole BSD > license claim into doubt. :-( I'll see if I can get that sorted-out > upstream... Excellent! Though I really suggest adding that BSD license to the top of rfkill.c to avoid any confusion in the future. (In reply to comment #4) > Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill.spec > SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Looks fine now, although using the improved summary and description suggested by Tomasz above will earn you extra karma. :) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 13:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131341.n8DDfQm6005555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-13 09:41:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdevplatform Short Description: Libraries for use by KDE development tools Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 13:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131345.n8DDjnW7022121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 --- Comment #1 from David Timms 2009-09-13 09:45:46 EDT --- Since I have played with this tool, I was considering packaging it... you beat me to it. Review begins: ===== OK rpmlint seeker.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK rpmlint seeker-3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm error checking signature of seeker-3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK name is non-conflicting with linux existing packages, fairly unique, first response in a google search. Note: a windows program exists with the name: Seeker for Windows (Box+Download) ( An Immersive 3D Solar System Experience Seeker is an immersive and interactive three dimensional solar simulator for your Windows Vista or XP computer. Experience simulated space flight and travel to, orbit and explore the Sun, Moon, planets, asteroids, and satellites with stunning realism... I don't think that is a problem since it isn't open source and there isn't linux version. OK spec named as package name. OK the original author asserts license: GNU General Public License v2. OK spec specifies same license GPLv2. OK license file has been created using the author's quoting of intent, and included in %doc OK spec is legible english OK the upstream is a single c source file: sha1sum seeker_baryluk.c ../upstream/seeker_baryluk.c 5c472a283c499c053bc4610a63b2db6015b45263 seeker_baryluk.c 5c472a283c499c053bc4610a63b2db6015b45263 ../upstream/seeker_baryluk.c OK compiles to binaries on f11-i586, only arch I tested. OK rpmlint on built packages has no warnings nor errors. OK requires package glibc-headers, this is not in the requires exception list, but I think would be brought in automatically through other packages in the list. rpm -q --requires shows that libc (GLIBC) has been automatically added. NA no locales. NA no shared libs. NA not relocatable. OK owns files/folders that it creates, no duplicates. OK permissions: binary is executable and read only for normal users, doc is readonly for normal users. has the standard defattr line. OK clean standard line is included. OK is consistently using macros. OK code contains excecutable, allowed content. OK doc is very small OK %doc files are not part of the util. OK no header files, no static libraries, no pkconfig, no suffixed libs OK not a devel package, no .la archives. OK not a GUI app. OK only owns files/folders it installs. OK install cleans buildroot OK filenames are good. OK utility runs and produces results as expected. ===== So, pretty well right to go, with just a few things to clarify / queries: ? Witold Baryluk's modification is the multithreaded version that is being packaged here. I think that explicitly stating that in the Description, and with the Source0: comment would be a good idea. It does seem to be the most appropriate version to package. ? Would it be worth having a script that enumerates connected disks, and performs the test on each one, pausing at completion ? And providing a desktop file as an easy way to run it ? ? why is the binary being placed in /usr/sbin ? ? consider including in %doc the html saveas from the original web site, since it gives a decent background on usage. Most users wouldn't know to check the url/source to find out more. Not sure if that would be suitable for the package description (ie add URL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 13:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131348.n8DDmvao006629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-13 09:48:56 EDT --- Hi, 1) The description is a little brief for gfork itself and could do with some expansion to describe gfork a little. 2) $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-gfork-* globus-gfork.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libglobus_gfork.so.0.0.2 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 globus-gfork-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-gfork/globus-gfork-libs/libglobus-gfork should at least be commented upon. rpmlint of .src.rpm and .spec pass fine. 3) Koji build good. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1674890 4) Should there be a default configuration file? [root at globus globus_gfork]# strace gfork 2>&1 | tail -3 ) = 6 write(5, "(null)/etc/gfork.confNo such file"..., 33) = 33 exit_group(1) 5) Not a blocker but there is not really any documentation for gfork in the package other than --help. Maybe that is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 14:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523034] New: Review Request: python-setuptools_trial - Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools_trial - Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523034 Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools_trial - Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-setuptools_trial-0.5.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131603.n8DG3usC028715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-13 12:03:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > @Mamoru Tasaka (Comment #8): > --- > | some binaries are installed under > | %_libdir/%name but not %_libdir > \-- > > In 'man ld-linux', it states that the dynamic linker/loader also searches > /usr/lib if it doesn't find the library in /lib. Isn't it not recursive? - No, it is not recursive. > --- > | Error: Problems running epstopdf. Check your TeX installation! > \-- > > Upstream has reported that the .tex files have been generated with doyxgen, and > thus has no control over it. We are not packaging .tex files in the RPM. - What I am saying is it is needed to check if "BuildRequires: texlive-utils" is needed or not (as epstopdf is in texlive-utils) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131613.n8DGDEns014114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 12:13:12 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131613.n8DGDsoA030578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 12:13:53 EDT --- Build in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131613.n8DGDUlQ030505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-13 12:13:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec > SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-7.src.rpm $ LANG=C wget -N http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-7.src.rpm --2009-09-14 01:12:46-- http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-7.src.rpm Resolving members.iinet.net.au... 203.0.178.90 Connecting to members.iinet.net.au|203.0.178.90|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 401 Authorization Required Authorization failed. ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131619.n8DGJRlZ031436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-13 12:19:27 EDT --- Shakthi remove the %post{,un} -p /sbin/ldconfig" Mamoru, no need to add texlive-utils as BR as there is no use of adding both html and latex outputs of doxygen. They provide the same information. Hence vrq opted for html only. Then it makes no sense compiling the latex files into a pdf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 16:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131648.n8DGm9sF020098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #99 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-13 12:47:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xtide New Branches: F-12 Owners: mtasaka Early branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 17:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131715.n8DHFbIx008754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Bug 475852 depends on bug 488534, which changed state. Bug 488534 Summary: RfE New upstream release is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488534 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 17:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131730.n8DHUCK5027042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 17:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131729.n8DHTfQg026679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|pcheung at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 13:29:36 EDT --- I've adopted this package and will like to get the review finished. I assume that this was a Merge Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 18:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131836.n8DIacnA022768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-09-13 14:36:37 EDT --- Thank you for this review Rex ! I'll update spec before import. As qt-devel>=4.5.2-12 is required, I'll only import it in devel branch. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: monkeystudio Short Description: Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE Owners: eponyme Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 18:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131843.n8DIh5Tn007168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #10 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-13 14:43:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Well, for 0.7.3-1 > > * Timestamps > - Now this package installs more files, keeping timestamps > on installed files as much as possible is preferable. > Please consider to use > ------------------------------------------------------ > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="insatll -p" CPPROG="cp -p" > ------------------------------------------------------ > to keep timestamps on installed files. > - Usually adding INSTALL="insatll -p" works for makefiles based > on Makefiles generated from recent autotools > - However this package also uses "install-sh" to install files. > For this, adding CPPROG="cp -p" will (usually) keep timestamps > on installed files. > Done. > * redundant %doc > - Files under %{_mandir} are automatically marked as %doc. > - Also files under %{_docdir} are automatically marked as %doc. > Done. > * Directory ownership issue > - This is actually under discussion, however this package installs > some files under %{_datadir}/aclocal/ and currently owned by > "automake" rpm. So adding "Requires: automake" to this package is > preferable to satisfy directory ownership issue. > Done. > - -docs package installs some files under %{_docdir}/%{name}/, > however the directory %{_docdir}/%{name} is not owned by any packages, > which should be owned by "this" (i.e. mm-common-docs) package: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories#Forgetting_to_Include_a_Toplevel_Directory I hope I got it right now. I added ownerships to %{_datadir}/%{name}/ and to %{_docdir}/%{name}/. > > ! %changelog > - I recommend to add entries into %changelog even this is still > under review. Ok. spec: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common.spec srpm: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 18:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131849.n8DInxUG008044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #12 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-13 14:49:58 EDT --- Removed %post{,un} -p /sbin/ldconfig. Updated: SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.58-3.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F10, F11 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1675377 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1675394 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1675397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 18:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131851.n8DIpaqF025091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-13 14:51:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vrq Short Description: Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 19:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131927.n8DJRHGH014434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 15:27:16 EDT --- Remove review flag. It was reviewed in #519488. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 19:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131926.n8DJQOXU014331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 15:26:23 EDT --- Remove review flag. It was reviewed in bug #519425. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 19:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131925.n8DJP6xV014103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-13 15:25:04 EDT --- Remove fedora-review flag. It was reviewed in #519236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 19:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909131932.n8DJWnWN015448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-13 15:32:48 EDT --- - rpmlint etckeeper.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/%{name}.* etckeeper.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/post-install.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/init.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/update-ignore.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/uninit.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/commit.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/pre-install.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/pre-commit.d/README etckeeper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/etckeeper/unclean.d/README 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 9 warnings. All these errors and warnings is harmless. ok. - naming. ok. - spec file name. ok. - legible and American English. ok. ! license. GPL file has GPLv2, while debian/copyright has GPLv2+ no files has license information, could you ping upstream about this? - guidelines. ok. remove comments in spec file? - source tarball: d41439dd78d1f85ad77aafdbeed4d460 etckeeper_0.40.tar.gz d41439dd78d1f85ad77aafdbeed4d460 etckeeper_0.40.tar.gz.1 ok. - build and runs fine. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1675401 ok. ! own all dirs. + add %dir /etc/etckeeper, it's not include. + add /etc/bash_completion.d too (a bit strange, seems to be normal though) + /usr/lib/yum-plugins and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d: this is possible yum dep, however I am tempted to relax that. - defattr. ok. - file listing. ok. - clean, macros. ok. - subpackage. ok. - install, utf-8. ok. Optional: etckeeper.8 has: SEE ALSO /usr/share/doc/etckeeper/README.gz could change that by sed/perl to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132011.n8DKBWj2022544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132011.n8DKBN0G022503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Alias| |mvaliyav at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-13 16:11:21 EDT --- Renaming would be very fine indeed. Some trivial nitpicking: 1. it seems we're not supposed to use the package name in the summary anymore, so I'd suggest rewriting it to ?A font for Burmese/Myanmar script? 2. you're missing a space after ?Myanmar block.? in the description Otherwise the package itself is fine ??? APPROVED ??? ( but really I had already approved it there https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436#c13 ) Please do not forget to update comps and get the old package blacklisted and do the other admin stuff documented in the wiki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132012.n8DKCgIu006557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132023.n8DKNwTl008440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-13 16:23:57 EDT --- Thanks Steve, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-email-address-validation Short Description: A PHP class for validating email addresses Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 20:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518574] Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132029.n8DKTe0U025833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518574 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-13 16:29:39 EDT --- Anytime soon, according to Peter (who maintains gupnp and rygel), but it still has not happened yet. When that happens, I'll withdraw this request. On the other hand, if you want to review this just in case, we can get this reviewed and I'll hold off on requesting CVS access until the beta freeze looms, in which case this goes in rather than us having to remove rygel from the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 21:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132110.n8DLAV3Y003869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skytt? 2009-09-13 17:10:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > ? Witold Baryluk's modification is the multithreaded version that is being > packaged here. I think that explicitly stating that in the Description, and > with the Source0: comment would be a good idea. Added, even though it might be subject to bitrot. > ? Would it be worth having a script that enumerates connected disks, and > performs the test on each one, pausing at completion ? And providing a > desktop file as an easy way to run it ? Perhaps, patches welcome ;). Not rocket science but the script should take root access requirement into account. But I think this can wait until post-review. Since you were considering packaging it, I can happily hand it over for you to maintain and improve, or co-maintain if you prefer that... > ? why is the binary being placed in /usr/sbin ? I assume you mean compared to placing it in /usr/bin? Because running it requires root access and I don't want to clutter normal users' PATH with it in setups that don't have /usr/sbin there. With recent Fedora defaults, /usr/sbin vs /usr/bin doesn't make much practical difference at all because both are in default PATH and I think this tool fits better in the former anyway. > ? consider including in %doc the html saveas from the original web site, > since it gives a decent background on usage. Done as upstream gives CC BY-SA 2.5 permission to do that at http://www.linuxinsight.com/about.html New srpm at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/seeker-3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm, specfile URL unchanged. * Sun Sep 13 2009 Ville Skytt? - 3.0-2 - Address review comments (#520701): - Improve %description. - Include upstream article in docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 22:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132236.n8DMajMb006445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #24 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-13 18:36:37 EDT --- Agreed, will change that. Thanks for the thorough review and patience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 22:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132237.n8DMbZSi006629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-13 18:37:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libkni3 Short Description: C++ library for the Katana robot arm Owners: timn Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 23:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132316.n8DNGZP8019185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-09-13 19:16:34 EDT --- [ DONE ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/ath_info-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [...] [ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license [ N/A ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. -> 45c09afe75003e449266b487138c7232 ath_info-20090902.tar.xz As the tarball is generated from SVN export, the checksum usually is never the same again. Tarball content matches with manual export. [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture [ N/A ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line [ N/A ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ N/A ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden [ N/A ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [ N/A ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [ OK ] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ N/A ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ N/A ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [ N/A ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ N/A ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ N/A ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ N/A ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. The package overall looks good to me, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 23:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132333.n8DNXAkf023323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #3 from nucleo 2009-09-13 19:33:09 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde.spec New SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.src.rpm New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1675784 $ rpmlint webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.src.rpm webkitkde-debuginfo-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitkde-devel-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitpart-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitpart-devel-0.0.1-0.1.20090914svn.fc11.i586.rpm 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 23:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909132342.n8DNgZrM026078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-13 19:42:34 EDT --- Could we see the packages that you have not released in public, or are they for some reason or another proprietary (e.g. done for a company under contract)? As discussed in the mailing list, any extra indication of packaging skill would help. There are a lot of packages that are waiting for reviewers that you can do pre-reviews for (say, 2 or 3); but looking at your previous packages would work too, even if they can't end up in Fedora for one reason or another. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 00:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140017.n8E0Hoi0019692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #48 from Feng Yu 2009-09-13 20:17:43 EDT --- Please let me know what to do after getting the cvs access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 00:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140018.n8E0IC2l003540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(nushio at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-13 20:18:10 EDT --- Changing status to ASSIGNED, just in case someone mistakenly lands on this bug looking for something to review. Juan, could you update the review? It's blocking gnome-do-plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 01:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140114.n8E1ETqT003644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-13 21:14:28 EDT --- Thanks for this - let's import the package! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 02:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140207.n8E27jEU031860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #49 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-13 22:07:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > Please let me know what to do after getting the cvs access. You should already have CVS access. Now you should request the creation of the CVS module for your package. Instructions are here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure This is how I'd fill in the request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-globalmenu Short Description: Centralized menu bar for GNOME Owners: fengyu Branches: InitialCC: bernie (remember to set the CVS request flag) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514911] Review Request: sil-padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140441.n8E4ffef028039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514911 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mvaliyav at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140445.n8E4jZkG011771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 00:45:33 EDT --- Hiran is promising a new release and an new website in October. Meanwhile on the packaging side since he created multiple fonts it would be nice to use a common prefix on the packages (similar to the apanov- prefix we use in packaging Andrey Panov's fonts) to mark they have the same origin (as required by guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140445.n8E4jxLP028815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 00:45:56 EDT --- Hiran is promising a new release and an new website in October. Meanwhile on the packaging side since he created multiple fonts it would be nice to use a common prefix on the packages (similar to the apanov- prefix we use in packaging Andrey Panov's fonts) to mark they have the same origin (as required by guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140450.n8E4oFBe012529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:50:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140453.n8E4rAxA029824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:53:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140455.n8E4t8pB013358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:55:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140458.n8E4wiE9030872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:58:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140459.n8E4xc0o031011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:59:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 04:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140456.n8E4uV7h030605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 00:56:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140503.n8E536hT015026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 01:03:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140502.n8E528bt014908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 01:02:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140501.n8E515Lh014767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 01:01:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140504.n8E54q25032032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 01:04:47 EDT --- I can't find user baz in FAS. Otherwise cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140510.n8E5Ak4Y001003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 01:10:45 EDT --- yum-plugin-download-order-0.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-plugin-download-order-0.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140509.n8E59jDh000560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 01:09:44 EDT --- yum-plugin-download-order-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yum-plugin-download-order-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140510.n8E5AJwC000925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #100 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 01:10:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140511.n8E5BWEO016857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140515.n8E5FW0W001997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-14 01:15:26 EDT --- set '?' for fedora-cvs, was missing. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140520.n8E5K4Zh019395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140531.n8E5VLOP021383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|rpandit at redhat.com | --- Comment #48 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-14 01:31:15 EDT --- This ticket is waiting for development from upstream and it would make sense to defer it for time till all changes are done. This has become an upstream devel mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140550.n8E5o7o5008337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-14 01:50:06 EDT --- Build submitted for Rawhide. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140557.n8E5vOTv025833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 01:57:22 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131820 cool! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140606.n8E6631T011489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #10 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-14 02:06:02 EDT --- Can this be built on koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140614.n8E6ENjH013047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-14 02:14:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Can this be built on koji? yes, please try this and let me know if works. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140623.n8E6NM8A014567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt 2009-09-14 02:23:21 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ath_info Short Description: Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards Owners: michich Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140631.n8E6VshJ032286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 02:31:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360878) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360878) quick creation of a RPM package for crystalspace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140633.n8E6XTx9032477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 02:33:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360881) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360881) a quick creation of a RPM package for pbbuttonsd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140632.n8E6Wtfo016423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 02:32:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=360880) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=360880) my favourite project the GNOME keyring XML interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140645.n8E6jKYi019064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 02:45:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could we see the packages that you have not released in public, or are they for > some reason or another proprietary (e.g. done for a company under contract)? Sure, I attached three SPEC files which I created in the last year or two. A lot of other SPEC files I already deleted because I didn't need them anymore. But since I'm using pyicq-t for a while I would like to contribute to this package. For example making it more compliant/easier to write a SELinux policy and so on. > As discussed in the mailing list, any extra indication of packaging skill would > help. There are a lot of packages that are waiting for reviewers that you can > do pre-reviews for (say, 2 or 3); but looking at your previous packages would > work too, even if they can't end up in Fedora for one reason or another. Yeah, I will have a look at some other packages too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 06:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140650.n8E6o3PN003789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 02:50:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > As discussed in the mailing list, any extra indication of packaging skill would > help. Oh btw I'm not sure if this counts but I also created in the last five to ten years a couple of Gentoo ebuilds, Debian APT packages and one package for OpenBSD. Nothing Fedora related but these distributions have their packaging guidelines/standards too. But again I was to lazy to publish these packages too ;-) Since for a couple of years I stick to Fedora and will use this distribution for a long time I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140701.n8E71dig005785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-14 03:01:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1676192 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3247bf9bde5aef712e22d0cf624d17ff8f1154c1 Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.42 cusr 0.15 csys = 0.61 CPU) + Package perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Module::Install::GithubMeta) = 0.10 Requires: perl(base) perl(Cwd) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140707.n8E77NYY006981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #64 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-14 03:07:15 EDT --- Jens: See Comment #61. In brief: awesome v2 is near to dead code, which I personally don't care. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140713.n8E7DbwC024447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #22 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-14 03:12:33 EDT --- Unfortunately, there is no update - i.e. upstream stopped to response. Didn't try to get in contact with upstream in quite a while though and will do so a last time right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140722.n8E7M3eL009860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #360878|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140722.n8E7Mob0009964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #360880|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] New: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-cgi/ghc-cgi.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-cgi/ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Haskell library for writing CGI programs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140722.n8E7MvAR026180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #360881|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140720.n8E7KxfD025924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 03:20:56 EDT --- Yaakov, are you still interested in packaging this? I've been running my own window-picker-applet for a while, I can take over the packaging if you want. Desperately need the extra vertical pixels that w-p-a + maximus gives :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140723.n8E7NxHx010182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |package/cgi CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140745.n8E7jraI015298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 03:45:52 EDT --- $ rpmlint dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm dyndns.src: W: invalid-license GPL error checking signature of dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm dyndns.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install dyndns.src: E: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. - the license tag must be GPLv2+ - add a proper BuildRoot tag (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag) - if you don't want to support older Fedora/EPEL versions, E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install can be ignored (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install) - add your full name to the %changelog entry and put the email address in angle brackets (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs) This seems to be your first package submission to Fedora (I can't find you in the Fedora Account System). Thus you need a sponsor: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140747.n8E7lwaW031313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 03:47:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This seems to be your first package submission to Fedora (I can't find you in > the Fedora Account System). Thus you need a sponsor Sorry, I just saw that you've already added FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140810.n8E8ASsj021227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 04:10:23 EDT --- Yes, I think you're right. It's probably better to leave BR as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140817.n8E8H5fc006204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-14 04:17:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1676190 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. unable to verify source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140824.n8E8ODIY008450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) Bug 516280 depends on bug 515079, which changed state. Bug 515079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-14 04:24:12 EDT --- build failed with DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for perl(Curses::UI) >= 0.9606 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140900.n8E90I38018899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-14 05:00:16 EDT --- Drop review flag. It was reviewed in #518550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140901.n8E91RjX003871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #17 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-14 05:01:25 EDT --- Drop review flag. It was reviewed in #518650. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140900.n8E90qHb003675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-14 05:00:50 EDT --- Drop review flag. It was reviewed in #518634. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 09:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140902.n8E9246r004071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-14 05:02:02 EDT --- Drop review flag. This is part of netbeans-ide package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 10:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141010.n8EAAQUK020444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-14 06:10:25 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/emacs-jabber.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/emacs-jabber-0.8.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Addresses all issues. #1 done #2 done (removed by adding configure option) #3 jabber-init is the file which adds site-lisp/jabber to load-path, and it is required. Rpmlint output on it can be ignored. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 10:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141030.n8EAUxNj024149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 06:30:55 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 10:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141031.n8EAV4oH007310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 06:31:03 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 11:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141118.n8EBI6D9002307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 07:18:02 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathgl-1.9-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 11:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141118.n8EBIC2I002360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 07:18:11 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mathgl-1.9-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 11:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141150.n8EBoAvD024485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-14 07:50:07 EDT --- Feel free to take this over, i have no interest in this package, since i don't use Gnome anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141235.n8ECZ1up001598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-14 08:34:58 EDT --- rpmlint output: csync-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is OK. ** NEEDSWORK: %{_sysconfdir}/csync/ should be %dir %{_sysconfdir}/csync/ since the first version also pulls in everything in the directory. For the sake of clearness, move the %dir statement before the config files. and %{_libdir}/csync-0/csync_smb.so should be %{_libdir}/csync-0/ ** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK - See above, config files are listed twice. MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NEEDSWORK - doc/userguide is 148K, i.e. a rather large portion of the csync package. Move it to -doc. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - csync requires anyway csync-libs for operation, so you don't need to duplicate COPYING in the main package. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141235.n8ECZkh8020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-14 08:35:45 EDT --- I'm also not quite sure about the necessity of a separate -libs package, I'd combine it to the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141237.n8ECbjLG003190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #12 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-14 08:37:44 EDT --- Ok, it was successfully built on dist-F11 and dist-F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141239.n8ECdA54003446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Adam Stokes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |astokes at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |astokes at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 12:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141244.n8ECijO3005025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Adam Stokes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Adam Stokes 2009-09-14 08:44:44 EDT --- Please define the SourceURL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Since this is on fedora hosted you can put it in the hosted releases section: https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq How can I publish archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project? Create the archive on your workstation and run scp myProject-0.1.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:. The archive will be located under https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ Thanks, Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141302.n8ED258j010054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-14 09:02:04 EDT --- ? rpmlint on every package. perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/PDL/Graphics/PLplot/PLplot.bs OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. ? package has a good license. License is not written in package/cpan page. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. eb4d4e30bad6ce5afa5456fb49afb789 ? successful koji compilation. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1676904 OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. The biggest problem is failing koji build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smilner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-1.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ncrack is a high-speed network authentication cracking tool. It was built to help companies secure their networks by proactively testing all their hosts and networking devices for poor passwords. Security professionals also rely on Ncrack when auditing their clients. Ncrack was designed using a modular approach, a command-line syntax similar to Nmap and a dynamic engine that can adapt its behaviour based on network feedback. It allows for rapid, yet reliable large-scale auditing of multiple hosts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141316.n8EDG1iB013411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |authentication cracking | |tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225614] Merge Review: bind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141328.n8EDSjAD016285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225614 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Adam Tkac 2009-09-14 09:28:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bind New Branches: F-13 Owners: atkac Reason: I would like to test upcomming major bind release early. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141335.n8EDZGlE018388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan at seekline.net --- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 09:35:15 EDT --- The spec file looks OK, only a small thing left: pycryptopp.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 13) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141333.n8EDXDwr017872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Bowe Strickland changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bowe at redhat.com) | --- Comment #10 from Bowe Strickland 2009-09-14 09:33:10 EDT --- re: testing: - to me some extra symbols doesn't seem overly burdensome, if the library doesn't bloat much. never used a %check before, though, so would need to research it some, and currently under the gun. am willing to add it in future, but want to incorporate other quick changes. - pgkconfig kept - install -p added - migrated docs from -devel to base package, rpmlint now warns there's no docs. shrug. updated spec file at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode.spec updated srpm at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode-3.1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141353.n8EDrjq3022853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #18 from Matt Domsch 2009-09-14 09:53:43 EDT --- praveen, you didn't request to be an owner, so you're not. You can go to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb, select this package, and request various package rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141354.n8EDs5ln008208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-14 09:54:04 EDT --- Thanks, new version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.15-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 13:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141358.n8EDwgve024307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Timms 2009-09-14 09:58:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > ? Witold Baryluk's modification is the multithreaded version that is being > > packaged here. I think that explicitly stating that in the Description, and > > with the Source0: comment would be a good idea. > > Added, even though it might be subject to bitrot. OK. > > ? Would it be worth having a script that enumerates connected disks, and > > performs the test on each one, pausing at completion ? And providing a > > desktop file as an easy way to run it ? > > Perhaps, patches welcome ;). Not rocket science but the script should take > root access requirement into account. But I think this can wait until > post-review. Since you were considering packaging it, I can happily hand it > over for you to maintain and improve, or co-maintain if you prefer that... I only thought of this because I did something similar for another one I just submitted for review (tnef #522920). bash/gnome-desktop isn't my fort'e, so any comments on that would be welcome. Will keep it in mind for later. > > ? consider including in %doc the html saveas from the original web site, > > since it gives a decent background on usage. > > Done as upstream gives CC BY-SA 2.5 permission to do that at > http://www.linuxinsight.com/about.html Wow, that looks great (like better than the original web site), I'll have to remember tidy as a useful tool. OK. > New srpm at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/seeker-3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm, > specfile URL unchanged. Checked updated srpm. rpmlints OK, compiles, runs OK. All queries answered, and package updated as suggested. ===== As I can see Ville is an existing contributor and sponsor in Fedora, I (David Timms) hereby approve the package seeker. ===== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141411.n8EEBZGc012535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 --- Comment #7 from John W. Linville 2009-09-14 10:11:34 EDT --- /dev/rfkill arrives in 2.6.31 kernels. I'll look at the summary and description stuff...thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141415.n8EEF9fv028654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from John W. Linville 2009-09-14 10:15:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rfkill Short Description: A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces Owners: linville Branches: F-11 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141417.n8EEHMJR013970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 10:17:21 EDT --- synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141417.n8EEHHGF013926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 10:17:16 EDT --- synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141417.n8EEHdaQ029289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-xerces-c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523224] New: Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: antti.andreimann at mail.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/mingw32-xerces-c.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/mingw32-xerces-c-3.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Xerces-C is a validating XML parser written in a portable subset of C++. Xerces-C makes it easy to give your application the ability to read and write XML data. A shared library is provided for parsing, generating, manipulating, and validating XML documents. Xerces-C is faithful to the XML 1.0 recommendation and associated standards (DOM 1.0, DOM 2.0. SAX 1.0, SAX 2.0, Namespaces). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1677082 This package is for the MinGW32 build system and should conform to those guidlines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW It is based on a later version of xerces-c libraries than the current one present in Fedora. Version 3.x is a LOT easier to cross-compile making the SPEC much cleaner and simpler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141420.n8EEKqnI015117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #7 from Adam Stokes 2009-09-14 10:20:51 EDT --- Also make sure when you upload the new spec that it has the alteration from comment #2 Thanks! Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141420.n8EEKt4e015158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #29 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-14 10:20:52 EDT --- I have create a new build of gnustep-base agains gnustep-make-2.2.0: New Releases: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.18.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141434.n8EEYhKY001054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 10:34:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t.spec SRPM URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-2.fc11.src.rpm Created a new RPM for some minor changes. For example, added the requirement shadow-utils like indicated here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups % rpmlint pyicq-t-mysql-0.8.1.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-2.fc11.noarch.rpm pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml 0600 pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/spool/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/pyicq-t 0700 pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pyicq-t 0700 pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5/managessi.py /usr/bin/env pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5/migrate.py /usr/bin/env pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5/managessi.py R pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5/migrate.py R pyicq-t.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/pyicq-t 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 13 warnings. I guess the warnings non-standard-{g,u}id and errors non-standard-dir-perm can be ignored. The config files in /etc/pyicq-t shouldn't be readable by any other user because they contain clear text passwords. The daemon spool files under /var/spool/pyicq-t contain all clear text passwords for all clients. Therefore it shouldn't be readable too. I'm unsure about the doc-file-dependency warning. Since /usr/bin/env will be available on all other systems, my guess is that we can ignore this too. Or what does the crowd say? Additionally the warning no-reload-entry can be ignored too, or does it? Not every daemon needs a reload entry, right? For the last two warnings I couldn't find something in here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues So I'm not 100% sure what to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141436.n8EEae9E001923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #26 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-14 10:36:36 EDT --- Any progress on this package? I am going to close this review request, shouldn't we hear from the OP within 1 week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141445.n8EEjhSi022425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gavin at redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-14 10:45:42 EDT --- Thanks for taking this on Adam. I've fixed the SourceURL bit, and improved the rhel5 handling as outlined above. I've bumped the release and pushed a new spec file, new tarball, and new srpm to both fedorapeople (the urls mentioned above) and to fedorahosted.org: https://fedorahosted.org/released/fastback/fastback.spec https://fedorahosted.org/released/fastback/fastback-0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm https://fedorahosted.org/released/fastback/fastback-0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 14:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141457.n8EEvwIX025537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #9 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-14 10:57:58 EDT --- In case it's not clear, this package is for both Fedora and EPEL5, and assuming it's approved, I'll be asking for both Fedora and EPEL5 branches. -gavin... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141509.n8EF97ao011007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-14 11:09:06 EDT --- > pyicq-t.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/pyicq-t https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Required_Actions > pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency "rpmlint -i ..." explains this. > -%defattr(-,root,root,-) > +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) AFAIK, this doesn't improve anything (contrary to the %attr usage). [...] * The "config.patch" doesn't match with the initscript and spec file. Please review carefully. * The rpmdiff against pyicq-t-0.8.1.3-2 reveals two https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141512.n8EFCQUQ011977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-14 11:12:25 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.51-3.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Sep 14 2009 Orion Poplawski 0.51-3 - Add BR on perl(Test::More) - Exclude PLplot.bs Successful Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1677343 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141516.n8EFG8jx013299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 --- Comment #2 from Martin Nagy 2009-09-14 11:16:06 EDT --- Hi, here's some issues that I've found: Package builds successfully in mock. Release starts from 0, should be 1. The summary really doesn't say much. Maybe something along the lines of "Event system based on libtalloc"? Maybe you can copy&paste the description from tevent home page. Copy & paste errors: Summary: Developer tools for the Talloc library A library that implements a hierarchical allocator with destructors. Header files needed to develop programs that link against the Talloc library. Please use %post and %postun with the -p switch as recommended in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries Please don't pass --prefix=%{_usr} to %configure, it is not necessary (see the output of rpm --eval %configure) Unneeded dependencies: libxslt, docbook-style-xsl It seems that the autoconf dependency and running ./autogen.sh is unnecessary, the package seems to build OK without them. Outstanding issues from the review guidelines: MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. rpmlint output: libtevent.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libtevent.so.0.9.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libtevent.x86_64: W: no-documentation libtevent.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig libtevent.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. I couldn't find any documentation myself, so the no-documentation warning is understandable. I already talked about the %post{,un} scriplets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 15:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141556.n8EFu3dq025427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew | |.edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141604.n8EG4Zel027531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:04:34 EDT --- vrq-1.0.58-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vrq-1.0.58-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141604.n8EG4kTH011837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:04:45 EDT --- vrq-1.0.58-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vrq-1.0.58-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141604.n8EG4fh7011802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:04:40 EDT --- vrq-1.0.58-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vrq-1.0.58-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141613.n8EGDbZl013974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-14 12:13:36 EDT --- Sometimes are the zero files needed even if rpmlint is complaining. You should decide this yourself ;-) The license is still unknown from the package. I didn't find it anywhere mentioned in package or on site. This is slow but you should contact upstream about correct licensing, if you've also don't find it in files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141624.n8EGOl0W017555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:24:46 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141624.n8EGOgJw017521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:24:41 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141628.n8EGSCJF018583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:28:11 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141628.n8EGSHjo018619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:28:17 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141628.n8EGSMNk018654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 12:28:21 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 16:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141651.n8EGprN4024263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Adam Stokes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Adam Stokes 2009-09-14 12:51:51 EDT --- Looks good, ack'd. One thing though I would only use fedorahosted.org/releases for source hosting as you will notice your directory getting filled up with tons of src rpms, however, its up to you. Thanks, Adam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141719.n8EHJutq014030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 13:19:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141733.n8EHXEYt003318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-14 13:33:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fastback Short Description: File uploader, configureable file uploader Owners: gavin Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141735.n8EHZdd7019367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #12 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-14 13:35:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Looks good, ack'd. Thanks. > One thing though I would only use fedorahosted.org/releases for source hosting > as you will notice your directory getting filled up with tons of src rpms, Yes, once it's actually in Fedora there will be no need for me to host rpms out there. Just the tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141733.n8EHXEIF018485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 13:33:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dogtag PKI is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag PKI PKI Common Framework is required by the following four Dogtag PKI subsystems: the Dogtag Certificate Authority, the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager, the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, and the Dogtag Token Key Service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141740.n8EHe6a8005904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 13:40:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t.spec SRPM URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-3.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #8) > > pyicq-t.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/pyicq-t > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Required_Actions Yeah added try-restart, reload and force-reload to the init script. > > pyicq-t.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > > "rpmlint -i ..." explains this. Jep, removed the execution permissions. > > -%defattr(-,root,root,-) > > +%defattr(0644,root,root,0755) > > AFAIK, this doesn't improve anything (contrary to the %attr usage). I added the 0644 perms because I wanted to circumvent the problem with a couple of files which where accidentally labelled as executables. Now I changed that and do a chmod in the %install section. Additionally I will inform upstream. Maybe they want to change this too. Because the executable files don't have a sha-bang, so no real intention to execute them. > * The "config.patch" doesn't match with the initscript and spec file. Please > review carefully. Argl, your right. A typo which I looked over and over. > * The rpmdiff against pyicq-t-0.8.1.3-2 reveals two > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories Hmm, I can't reproduce this. Can you tell me your exact commands? The latest changes are in release 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141745.n8EHjtOq007658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 13:45:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dogtag PKI is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag Certificate Authority User Interface contains the graphical user interface for the Dogtag Certificate Authority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141751.n8EHpkLj009263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-14 13:51:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sometimes are the zero files needed even if rpmlint is complaining. You should > decide this yourself ;-) I'm not sure. I removed it and the module at least loads. I can only find one or two other perl modules with .bs files. We'll see. > The license is still unknown from the package. I didn't find it anywhere > mentioned in package or on site. This is slow but you should contact upstream > about correct licensing, if you've also don't find it in files. >From an email: Hi Orion: Sorry about not putting the license in. I'll add a COPYRIGHT file for the next release. It will be under a perl Artistic License: Copyright (c) 2004-2009 Douglas Hunt. All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. Regards, Doug dhunt at ucar.edu Software Engineer UCAR - COSMIC, Tel. (303) 497-2611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 17:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141753.n8EHrbxk024843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 13:53:35 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/ca/pki-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/ca/pki-ca-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dogtag PKI is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag Certificate Authority is a required PKI subsystem which issues, renews, revokes, and publishes certificates as well as compiling and publishing Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs). The Dogtag Certificate Authority can be configured as a self-signing Certificate Authority (CA), where it is the root CA, or it can act as a subordinate CA, where it obtains its own signing certificate from a public CA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141800.n8EI0Hrb012576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-14 14:00:15 EDT --- Is the package pki-ca or ca? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141813.n8EIDxuY030806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New Package for Dogtag PKI: |New Package for Dogtag PKI: |ca |pki-ca --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 14:13:57 EDT --- The package name is actually pki-ca. I've changed the title of the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141820.n8EIKqoK018103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #14 from Andy Cress 2009-09-14 14:20:50 EDT --- The BuildRequires: openssl-devel was added in ipmiutil-2.4.2 and later. The current release is now ipmiutil-2.4.3, see SPEC URL: http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec SRC RPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.4.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141842.n8EIgpEQ024151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #30 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-14 14:42:47 EDT --- back from vacation. i will take care of this within this week or by next weerk at the latest. I will try to work with upstream together! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141843.n8EIhipe024286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 14:43:43 EDT --- - according to the source file headers the license is GPLv2 only but with exceptions (the tag must probably be "GPLv2 with exceptions") - You should preserve the timestamp of COPYING.OpenSSH. Also, replace ASCII by ISO-8859-1: iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF8 COPYING.OpenSSH -o COPYING.OpenSSH.new touch -r COPYING.OpenSSH COPYING.OpenSSH.new mv COPYING.OpenSSH.new COPYING.OpenSSH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141844.n8EIioHK007214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #16 from Luke Macken 2009-09-14 14:44:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > * Tue Sep 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0.3-2 > > - Remove the SQLAlchemy requirement, as python-zope-sqlalchemy > > is now set to include the appropriate version > > Does TG2 require SQLAlchemy only indirectly via python-zope-sqlalchemy? Yes, this is what upstream does. The python-tg-devtools package will pull in SQLAlchemy too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141841.n8EIfGHL006778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #15 from Luke Macken 2009-09-14 14:41:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > python-repoze-what-quickstart is required to build this package, adding to > dependency. Can somebody look at dependency tree and ask for release? Looks > like all are approved, just need to be commited to stable updates. > > Why this "needinfo from nobody" is good for? > > Luke, can you add this release of TurboGears2 into your tg2 repository? I can't > build TurboGears2 on my system now and build in mock does not work due to > packages, which have been not released. The latest build has been in my repo for a while now. We're still waiting on a couple of reviews: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TurboGears2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141842.n8EIgmXp006942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-14 14:42:47 EDT --- Well, - This package itself can be approved now. - I checked your pre-review and it seems good to some extent for the first comments. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (mm-common) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141850.n8EIoUOe026543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 14:50:28 EDT --- Also, this is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141851.n8EIpQw4026702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #17 from Luke Macken 2009-09-14 14:51:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > BTW: > > %if 0%{?fedora} <= 6 > BuildRequires: python-wsgiref > %endif > > Why this? Dumb conditional to catch RHEL 5. I've changed it to %{?el5:BuildRequires: python-wsgiref} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 18:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:54:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141854.n8EIshqC027716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #22 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-14 14:54:40 EDT --- Back from vacation after 4,5 weeks. Thank you very much for your help. new package: SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bauble-0.9.4/bauble.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bauble-0.9.4/bauble-0.9.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141907.n8EJ7JLf030796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #10 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-14 15:07:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t.spec SRPM URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-4.fc11.src.rpm In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript a couple of suggestions are made for a proper init script. I followed some and changed the file, e.g. the return/exit codes are now much better (exit 2 if invalid arguments, exit 5 if no exec file, exit 6 if no config file). % rpmlint pyicq-t.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint pyicq-t-mysql-0.8.1.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. % rpmlint pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/pyicq-t/config.xml 0600 pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/spool/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/pyicq-t 0700 pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/pyicq-t pyicqt pyicq-t.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/pyicq-t 0700 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141913.n8EJDUeX015198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #3 from Erick Calder 2009-09-14 15:13:29 EDT --- > $ rpmlint dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm ugh. I should have run it :) > - the license tag must be GPLv2+ fixed > - add a proper BuildRoot tag I actually had removed this tag because of the text below (found at the link you indicate): "The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag. Fedora releases older than 10 and EPEL releases older than or equal to 5 still need to have the tag." but I guess I should support older versions, so I've added it back > no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install can be ignored added back > - add your full name to the %changelog entry done [rpm at janus ~]$ rpmlint /var/ftp/rpmz/src/dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141914.n8EJELsS032377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 --- Comment #3 from Simo Sorce 2009-09-14 15:14:20 EDT --- Ok uploaded new srpm and spec file in the same place. I think I have addressed all issues, and I am going to notify upstream about license files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141925.n8EJP9Vm018319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516280 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141925.n8EJP76s018285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516271 Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #2 from David Hannequin 2009-09-14 15:25:06 EDT --- Hi, You need package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271. best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141941.n8EJfHmB008290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141939.n8EJdlVQ007577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-14 15:39:46 EDT --- $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-mp-* globus-mp-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-mp/globus-mp-libs/libglobus-mp first one is the same as another globus-gfork package so a reason for one of them good enough. Koji build fine. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1678401 Again a better description of what the message passing library is for might be useful. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 19:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909141957.n8EJvN4x025546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #9 from David Hannequin 2009-09-14 15:57:20 EDT --- Hi, Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm I fix license. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142019.n8EKJXXx030676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2009-09-14 16:19:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review. As said, feel free to apply for co-maintainership if you wish in pkgdb, or let me know if you'd like primary maintainership. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: seeker Short Description: Random access disk benchmark utility Owners: scop Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142023.n8EKN6ZJ017679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 16:23:05 EDT --- When you have any licensing doubt just block FE-LEGAL and let spot sort it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142037.n8EKbEnT021848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-14 16:37:13 EDT --- Review: 1. please do not put changelog-like info in a package description (what's new in the latest version). The description is supposed to be stable over time so l10 does not struggle with it 2. attribution to Barry Shwartz is better done in the description than in the summary 3. the rest of the spec mostly follows the standard template and thus is ok 4. the fontconfig rule is ok too, and the prio seems sane 5. oflb-prociono-fonts.src: W: uncompressed-zip chemoelectric_-_Prociono.zip is not your problem, that just means upstream forgot to compress its zip, so it wastes space So the technical part of package is good, just clear your licensing doubts with Spot and I'll approve it all (sorry I was not available in august to look at this fine package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142044.n8EKir38023468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Martin Nagy 2009-09-14 16:44:52 EDT --- Sorry, I just noticed one little bit: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libtevent.a I think it would be better to not use -f here. This however is not a blocker, so just use your own judgement. All the blockers were addressed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142047.n8EKlYUA005574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-14 16:47:33 EDT --- ismael, you took ownership of this review but don't seem to have done anything with it. could you please either review the package or release it so someone else can? btw, latest version of SRPM: http://www.happyassassin.net/video-experimental/rawhide/SRPMS/libva-0.31.0.1.sds3-1.fc12.src.rpm spec link has also been updated. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 20:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142050.n8EKogCY006157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 Simo Sorce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Simo Sorce 2009-09-14 16:50:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtevent Short Description: Tevent is an event system based on the talloc memory management library. Owners: simo Branches: F-11 InitialCC: gd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142119.n8ELJAGl015457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-14 17:19:09 EDT --- I think the URL tag is not correct because I can't find anything about the program on the site. Another problem is the package and the binaries name: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142126.n8ELQgKQ017457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 17:26:39 EDT --- Jason: was waiting on Yaakov, and I guess I just forgot about it myself. Yaakov, do you want to continue the review, or can I close this and file my own? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142132.n8ELW52B004590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 --- Comment #16 from Scott J Henson 2009-09-14 17:32:02 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wipe New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142133.n8ELX3dX004796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 Scott J Henson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142133.n8ELX5P6004834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 17:33:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142136.n8ELaVJb005868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-14 17:36:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142134.n8ELYoGv005244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-14 17:34:48 EDT --- Ok I've missed that the archive can be downloaded from another place. NeedChange - pick the tar.bz2 seems more appropriate instead of the tar.gz as Source0: * Juste a note: /lib/firmware/rt2860.bin /lib/firmware/rt2870.bin Thoses firmware comes from Ralink, but the kernel support for them might be missing. (they are missing from 2.6.30 at least) * From the initial package (~300ko) to the current (~9000 ko), the package grown by a ratio of 30. I'm really in favour of more splitting. On the other side, we will probably need to update the guideline about how to package firmware, because we used to have one package per module (which module name used to match the firmware package name). https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Firmware and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#BinaryFirmware. Quoting: "Firmware packages must be named -firmware, where is the driver or other hardware component that the firmware is for. " This will probably need to update the current packaging guideline WRT firmwares. * I used to try to make a dvb-firmware package using the get-dvb-firmware perl script bundled in the kernel-doc package, but thoses files where conflicting: /lib/firmware/v4l-cx231xx-avcore-01.fw /lib/firmware/v4l-cx23885-avcore-01.fw /lib/firmware/v4l-cx23885-enc.fw /lib/firmware/v4l-cx25840.fw But some firmwares from http://www.linuxtv.org/downloads/firmware/ are still missing, I expect it would be better to have another archive/package for those v4l/dvb firmware to avoid conflict and to have them sorted (at least) by category. Do we have an updated package (as suggested in c#6)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142142.n8ELgvcV007327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #13 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-14 17:42:56 EDT --- Yeah, go ahead with your own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142144.n8ELiXgM020865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #12 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-14 17:44:32 EDT --- I requested for sponsorship. FAS name: krnowak Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] New: Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/netbook/gnome-applets-window-picker.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/netbook/gnome-applets-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: A gnome-panel applet that displays open windows as icons on the panel, and has integrated window title-bar functionality. Optimised for use on netbook-size screens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142151.n8ELpZaP009612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 17:51:32 EDT --- *** Bug 451773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142151.n8ELpYN1009577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 17:51:31 EDT --- Thanks; I just filed the review request. Tim, would you like to continue with the review? I addressed your concern with package naming. And the 0.5 series is much more visually attractive too. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 523326 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142154.n8ELsLPS022974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 17:54:20 EDT --- Been running this version on my netbook since yesterday, with no problem so far. Koji F-11 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1678712 Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1678683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 21:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] New: Review Request: maximus - A window management tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maximus - A window management tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Summary: Review Request: maximus - A window management tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/netbook/maximus.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/netbook/maximus-0.4.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A desktop daemon which will automatically maximise and, optionally, un-decorate windwos. Has support for exclusion lists and will work with any EWMH-spec compliant window-manager. Created for netbook environments where normally every window is maximised and removing the titlebar would give an extra 24px for the application to display. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142202.n8EM2I2r012151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 18:02:17 EDT --- Yaakov, thanks. I guess you're using xmonad now? Fabian, do you want to continue reviewing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142207.n8EM7KZc026549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #10 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-14 18:07:18 EDT --- I thought you were expecting the FE-LEGAL resolution :-m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:10:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142210.n8EMAF2e027499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim at niemueller.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim at niemueller.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142213.n8EMDSx3015140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142211.n8EMBaWv014904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142211.n8EMBZoF014883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142209.n8EM9vYm014140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim at niemueller.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim at niemueller.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142213.n8EMDZeU028115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142215.n8EMFjvX015911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 18:15:44 EDT --- Koji F-11 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1678775 Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1678731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142215.n8EMFkhc015953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-14 18:15:45 EDT --- oh, damn, yes, sorry, you're quite right. It's been a busy day :|. sorry! i'll bug them instead. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142215.n8EMF66m015730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 18:15:05 EDT --- rpmlint is also unhappy with the binary package: :) rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/*.rpm dyndns.x86_64: E: no-binary dyndns.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/cache/dyndns dyndns-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. Adding BuildArch: noarch will remove the first and third error. Concerning the zero-length file I'm not sure. Is it really necessary to package the empty file /var/cache/dyndns? Erick, you should also increase the release tag every time you make changes to the spec file (so the current release is 2). Finally two minor notes: your email address given in the changelog seems to lack at least the TLD. Also, the list items in each changeset should start with a hyphen (even if there's only one entry), e.g: * Sat Sep 12 2009 Erick Calder - 1.0-1 - Initial build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142221.n8EMLUKi017001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 18:21:29 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142221.n8EMLPLf029823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 18:21:24 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpx-viewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142229.n8EMTSid032500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Bug 514634 depends on bug 510945, which changed state. Bug 510945 Summary: New release available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510945 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142241.n8EMfQnn004383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-14 18:41:25 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. IMO the package name should be gnome-applet-window-picker (applet vs. applets) as it only contains a single applet. No need to make a new package now, stay tuned for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142243.n8EMhvid004957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #23 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-14 18:43:54 EDT --- Final Review: 1) The build doesn't use the standard build flags defined by rpm for this platform. So instead of using "CFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE" with "configure", CFLAGS = "$CFLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE" should be used. (current line :44) - %configure --enable-debug --enable-ssl --enable-pam --enable-ipv6 CFLAGS= -D_GNU_SOURCE + %configure --enable-debug --enable-ssl --enable-pam --enable-ipv6 CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE" 2) The base package (sblim-sfcb-1.3.4-6.fc10.i386.rpm) doesn't contain any libraries in it. To fix this, (current line: 69) - #echo "%{_libdir}/sfcb/*.so*" >> _pkg_list + echo "%{_libdir}/sfcb/*.so.*" >> _pkg_list This will add *.so.0, *.so.0.0 files into the package. 3) The devel package should only have the *.so files. So, (current lines 100,101) - %{_libdir}/sfcb/*.so* - %{_libdir}/sfcb/*.la + %{_libdir}/sfcb/*.so The static libraries should not be part of either the base or the devel package. 4) The tar present in the source RPM doesn't match the original sources. This is a requirement with Fedora Packaging. If any changes have to be made, they have to be added as patches. 5) The package builds fine on mock currently, will check again once the above changes are implemented. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142256.n8EMuUbC028950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 22:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142258.n8EMw4e4010065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-14 18:58:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is it really necessary to package the empty file > /var/cache/dyndns? Should be included, but ghosted, see: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-FLIST-GHOST-DIRECTIVE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493750] Review Request: netcf - a library for managing network configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142308.n8EN8QLc013174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142313.n8END3V1014462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #14 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-14 19:13:02 EDT --- I've committed, tagged, and built this for devel, F-12, F-11, and EL-5. I've bodhi updated it for all branches except F-12, which is frozen right now. Keeping this bz open as a reminder to bodhi update F-12 once it is open again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142313.n8ENDwY4014695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 19:13:57 EDT --- Thanks! As for the naming, IMHO, my understanding is that gnome-applets-window-picker means "this is a related subpackage of gnome-applets, providing a window picker", rather than "this is a collection of gnome applets". Thus someone who does "yum search gnome-applets" would see gnome-applets-window-picker, but would not see gnome-applet-window-picker. No precedent, though, it seems -- there have been other applets before but none have adopted the subpackage naming convention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142320.n8ENKqQ2017167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #29 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-14 19:20:50 EDT --- > Issues: > FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets not sane: you are still updating icon cache although > there are no icons. I've updates the script to run on the dalston icons as discussed. SPEC: as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142323.n8ENN5I3004410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 19:23:01 EDT --- libkni3-3.9.2-12.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libkni3-3.9.2-12.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142324.n8ENOoKn018147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 19:24:49 EDT --- libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142324.n8ENO4lX004700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-14 19:24:03 EDT --- libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142326.n8ENQQtO005614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142343.n8ENhJ08010185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 19:43:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tomcatjss Short Description: A Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) implementation using Java Security Services (JSS) for Tomcat 5.5. Owners: kwright, mharmsen Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: dg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142339.n8ENdcOI009281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-14 19:39:37 EDT --- gnome-applets-window-picker would be correct if it was build from the same source as gnome-applets. But it's not, it's a package of it's own. The gnome-applet case is covered by the naming guidelines, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 I doubt someone will search for "applets" but for "applet" instead and it will return: $ yum search gnome-applet ============================ Matched: gnome-applet ============================ gnome-applets.x86_64 : Small applications for the GNOME panel gnome-applet-alarm-clock.x86_64 : Alarm clock for the GNOME panel gnome-applet-bubblemon.x86_64 : Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel gnome-applet-cpufire.x86_64 : GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire gnome-applet-globalmenu.x86_64 : GNOME panel applet of Global Menu gnome-applet-grdc.x86_64 : Remote desktop client based on GTK+ and Gnome gnome-applet-jalali-calendar.noarch : Jalali calendar panel applet for GNOME gnome-applet-music.x86_64 : A GNOME panel applet to control various music players gnome-applet-netspeed.x86_64 : GNOME applet that shows traffic on a network device gnome-applet-sensors.i586 : Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors gnome-applet-sensors.x86_64 : Gnome panel applet for hardware sensors gnome-applet-sensors-devel.i586 : Development files for gnome-applet-sensors gnome-applet-sensors-devel.x86_64 : Development files for gnome-applet-sensors gnome-applet-sshmenu.noarch : GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu gnome-applet-timer.x86_64 : A countdown timer applet for the GNOME panel gnome-applet-vm.x86_64 : Simple virtual domains monitor which embeds itself in the GNOME panel So "applet" is in line with the rest of the packages and IMO we should stick with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 23:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909142342.n8ENgpYZ023386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 19:42:50 EDT --- Please disregard comment #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150000.n8F00wqc028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #30 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 20:00:54 EDT --- Koji F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679163 There are a couple of minor things to fix (see below), and this package is on the way in. I forgot -- are you a sponsored maintainer? If not, set this to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR and I'll certify that I'll sponsor you. MUST FIX rpmlint gnustep-base.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 1) You can fix this with Emacs' "untabify" command OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines FIX license field accurate some files are actually GPLv3+, while others are still GPLv2+. This means the aggregate is GPLv3+. Most LGPL files are v2+ but some (makefiles! should these not be GNU public domain ?!) are LGPLv3+. Assuming that upstream intention is to switch files to (L)GPLv3+ as they are updated, I think we can say "LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+". If you could email upstream and get a clarification, and put a comment with the URL to the upstream mail from a mailing list archive, that would be great. The other alternative is to split out the v2 and v3 files, but that would be crazy if the division is merely temporal, rather than functional (i.e. if there is no distinct subpackage with a different license) OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English FIX spec legible - the comment for renaming pl mentions pllit but the file is renamed to pllist. OK source matches upstream $ md5sum gnustep-base-1.18.0.tar.gz ../SOURCES/gnustep-base- 1.18.0.tar.gz 880491e0fc64ab3507887f43faa67572 gnustep-base-1.18.0.tar.gz 880491e0fc64ab3507887f43faa67572 ../SOURCES/gnustep-base-1.18.0.tar.gz OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded see Koji link FIX build dependencies complete gmp-devel listed twice /usr/bin/iconv is bad for two reasons: - we frown on file-based dependencies because they can be expensive to resolve - it is part of glibc-common which is always installed OK library -> ldconfig FIX own all directories gnustep-base-devel should additionally requires gnustep-make: - it is a development package, and is useless without the other makefiles - it installs into %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional which is owned by gnustep-make OK no dupes in %files note: just a style thing, but %doc is normally put just under %defattr, not at the bottom. OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code OK headers in -devel OK if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel OK devel requires versioned base package OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD OK package build in mock on all architectures see Koji link ? package functioned as described will test with Oolite later OK scriplets are sane FIX require package not files see above (iconv) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150006.n8F06UQd017457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #15 from Colin Coe 2009-09-14 20:06:28 EDT --- My sincere apologies. This was not intentional and has been resolved. SRPM: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11.src.rpm This SRPM should address the remaining problems that you have highlighted. Thankyou for the constructive reviews and again, my apologies. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150009.n8F091LY031373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 20:08:58 EDT --- rpmlint /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/symkey/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/symkey-1.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm symkey.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libsymkey.so libsymkey.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. readelf -d /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/symkey/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/usr/lib/libsymkey.so | grep SONAME 0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libsymkey.so] We are requesting a waiver for this since 'libsymkey.so' is the native portion of a JNI library, and won't be used directly by any 'C' program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150010.n8F0AJ8g032076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 20:10:18 EDT --- rpmlint /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/symkey/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/symkey-1.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm symkey.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libsymkey.so libsymkey.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. readelf -d /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/symkey/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/usr/lib/libsymkey.so | grep SONAME 0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libsymkey.so] We request a waiver for this since 'libsymkey.so' is the native portion of a JNI library, and won't be used directly by any 'C' program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150008.n8F08rbs031301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #31 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 20:08:49 EDT --- And the rpmlint result from the binary RPMs: $ rpmlint gnustep-base* gnustep-base.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/GNUstep/Libraries/gnustep-base/Versions/1.18/Resources/NSTimeZones/.README.swp gnustep-base.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/gdomap 01755 gnustep-base-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. hidden-file: that should be deleted in %install gdomap: is there a reason for the sudo? The documentation warning is.. interesting. Could you see how gnustep-make does its documentation subpackage, and create a gnustep-base-doc subpackage? It'd be easier than gnustep-make's, since gnustep-make will already be installed when you start the build process (e.g. you can do 'make -C Documentation' in %build, not delay it to %install) Also, there is the 'Examples' directory. That should probably be not be built, but packaged as part of gnustep-base-devel, complete with the relevant makefiles, e.g. %files devel ... %doc Examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150016.n8F0GN8e020876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 20:16:21 EDT --- Ah, duh, and that's why I did not find any. OK, I'll rename it in the final version. Probably not worth creating a new SRPM though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150015.n8F0F6Md020454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 20:15:05 EDT --- correction to comment #3: should have used the osutil information here: rpmlint /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/osutil/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/osutil-1.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm osutil.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libosutil.so libosutil.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. readelf -d /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/osutil/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/usr/lib/libosutil.so | grep SONAME 0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libosutil.so] We request a waiver for this since 'libosutil.so' is the native portion of a JNI library, and won't be used directly by any 'C' program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] New: Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments.spec SRPM URL: http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/zikula-module-EZComments-0.1.61-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: New packager, seeking a sponsor. I based the spec off the specs of the 4 zikula modules listed below. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/zikula-module-MultiHook/F-11/zikula-module-MultiHook.spec?view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/zikula-module-News/F-11/zikula-module-News.spec?view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/zikula-module-scribite/F-11/zikula-module-scribite.spec?view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/zikula-module-feeds/EL-5/zikula-module-feeds.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150057.n8F0vUdI015066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-14 20:57:28 EDT --- change owners to: Owners: kwright -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150059.n8F0xR0C015556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-14 20:59:25 EDT --- I will change svn checkout => svn export before build as well. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gprof2dot Short Description: Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers Owners: toshio Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 00:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521947] Review Request: libtevent - talloc based event library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150059.n8F0xMsZ001946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521947 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 20:59:19 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150101.n8F11LUm016488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150102.n8F12ti7016840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150101.n8F110IB016261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:00:59 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150108.n8F18fRN018688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:08:39 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150107.n8F17l80018452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #34 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:07:42 EDT --- CVS Not done FedoraOLPCDelta is not a valid branch in cvs Polychronis and Ypodimatopoulos are not valid accounts in fas you need to use fas accounts and not emails for initialcc, and fas acounts for owners. please fix and submit a new cvs request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150111.n8F1BSGX019929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150112.n8F1CAJJ020116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:12:09 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225614] Merge Review: bind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150114.n8F1EU2J020802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225614 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:14:26 EDT --- im assuming you want early branching i.e. a F-12 branch CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150119.n8F1JY14022113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:19:33 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150123.n8F1NRCN009207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-14 21:23:25 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150145.n8F1jviE028789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150145.n8F1jtk5015020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-14 21:45:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta Short Description: A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 01:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150146.n8F1k9C7015116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #35 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2009-09-14 21:46:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > CVS Not done > > FedoraOLPCDelta is not a valid branch in cvs > > Polychronis and Ypodimatopoulos are not valid accounts in fas > > > you need to use fas accounts and not emails for initialcc, and fas acounts for > owners. please fix and submit a new cvs request. fas account: ypod I don't have permission to set the cvs request back to fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 02:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150213.n8F2DX2q020877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #65 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 22:13:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > awesome v2 is near to dead code I know, but what about bug 465759? Feels like this is never going to happen? Is it possible to make a separate package for cairo-xcb? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 03:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150326.n8F3QCeu018202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #7 from Erick Calder 2009-09-14 23:26:11 EDT --- > I think the URL tag is not correct because I can't find anything about the > program on the site. nah. url was correct, I just hadn't updated the website to include info on this utility (I'm the packager and author) > Another problem is the package and the binaries name: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Use_of_common_namespace I read the link but don't see anything wrong with the name. what are you suggesting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 03:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150327.n8F3RY9j018452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #66 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-14 23:27:33 EDT --- Since it's unmaintained by cairo folks, and the awesome developers insist on using it, perhaps we should ask them to see if they would take on the task of supporting cairo-xcb? After all, the current problems are stopping *their* window manager from shipping to a lot of users, and I consider Behdad's reasoning quite sound on this matter (the Ubuntu developers seem a bit more cavalier in this regard). Michal, anyone on the developers' side that you could suggest this to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 03:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150332.n8F3WloR005506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #8 from Erick Calder 2009-09-14 23:32:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Is it really necessary to package the empty file > > /var/cache/dyndns? > > Should be included, but ghosted, see: well... what I don't like about %ghost is that when I do rpm -ql I want to see my cache file. that file is useful since it contains the external IP address of my system and unless I can have it included in the listing, I won't necessarily know where it is -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 03:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150347.n8F3lkKD021785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #9 from Erick Calder 2009-09-14 23:47:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint is also unhappy with the binary package: :) gone as per BuildArch > Adding BuildArch: noarch will remove the first and third error done > Concerning the zero-length file I'm not sure. Is it really necessary > to package the empty file /var/cache/dyndns? I've ghosted it as per Christoph's suggestion, with a half-hearted objection. > Erick, you should also increase the release tag every time you make changes to > the spec file (so the current release is 2). done > Finally two minor notes: your email address given in the changelog seems to > lack at least the TLD. Also, the list items in each changeset should start > with a hyphen (even if there's only one entry) done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 04:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] New: Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Summary: Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f12/kio_gopher.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f12/kio_gopher-0.1.3-1.fc10.kde4.3.1.src.rpm Description: This KIO slave adds support for the Gopher protocol to Konqueror. F10 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679437 F11 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679452 F12 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679466 (all successful on all 4 architectures) rpmlint output on SRPM, i386.rpm and -debuginfo i386.rpm: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. To test, install the package and point Konqueror to: gopher://gopher.quux.org:70/1/ Compare with the web interface at: http://gopher.quux.org:70/ (Note that some links on that site don't work. They return the same errors through the web interface, so I assume this is a server side issue.) (It's interesting that the server supports both HTTP and Gopher on the same port.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150523.n8F5NpUQ005676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-15 01:23:50 EDT --- Great. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150538.n8F5cEdH008361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-15 01:38:13 EDT --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=132026 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150541.n8F5fPdx026672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Depends on| |491976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150547.n8F5lsra010296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #18 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 01:47:53 EDT --- Martin, just to check, you're not a sponsor either? I'll take a look at the discussion later -- getting late here -- but if no one is sponsoring this yet, I can do that pending a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150546.n8F5kUND010179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 01:46:28 EDT --- This sounds like it should be useful. I'll try and guide you through fixing the current problems, and then I'll sponsor you when the review is complete if everything is satisfactory. Getting a bit late here, so just some preliminary guidelines: - example files: these should be part of the documentation, perhaps for the -devel subpackage or -doc, but not in the base package, as they are really meant for developers' use. Sometimes the standard Makefile results in the examples being built as part of the build process; the easiest way out is for you to make a copy somewhere else within the source tree, maybe in %prep, before the 'make' invocation. Then when packaging, pick this copy of examples, rather than the original - Hidden files: sometimes developers accidentally package editor-created temporary files or (ugh!) OS X metadata files. That's why version-control tools like hg and git have commands to create archive tarballs, but there's nothing us packagers can do apart from cleaning up. You'd want to do this in %install, after make install - Arch-dependent-file: hmm. this, it's hard to say without knowing the specific case (wouldn't want to give you a half-asleep answer either). Let me know if there's anything else that's unclear -- I'll give my preliminary review, with more concrete suggestion, tomorrow, but feel free to update the package before then, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150553.n8F5reul011218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 01:53:39 EDT --- @ Martin (hi again!) just noticed you are actually a sponsor -- ignore my question on the other bug entry. Are you doing both reviews? I ended up here because the review flag is not set yet. We can split the reviews between us if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 05:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150556.n8F5uwWv011996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 01:56:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > rpmlint > /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/osutil/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/osutil-1.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm > osutil.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libosutil.so libosutil.so > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > readelf -d > /home/mharmsen/PKI/DOGTAG/release/pki/base/osutil/dist/rpmpkg/RPMS/i586/usr/lib/libosutil.so > | grep SONAME > 0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: > [libosutil.so] > > We request a waiver for this since 'libosutil.so' is the native portion of a > JNI library, and won't be used directly by any 'C' program. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI Quoted: JAR files that require JNI shared objects MUST be installed in %{_libdir}/%{name}. The JNI shared objects themselves must also be installed in %{_libdir}/%{name}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150605.n8F65Fv0013587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #19 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 02:05:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Martin, just to check, you're not a sponsor either? Right, I'm not a sponsor. So feel free to do the full review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150616.n8F6GIRe000557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 02:16:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > @ Martin (hi again!) > just noticed you are actually a sponsor Michel, no I'm not a sponsor. I hope I didn't convey this impression anywhere. So you can do the pending formal review of frepple too. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150624.n8F6OVqL001721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0-2 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2009-09-15 02:24:30 EDT --- Rawhide build done, F-11 and EL-5 will follow later. Thanks. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1679556 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150632.n8F6WWAw018595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tmraz at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150646.n8F6kIDC005794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(e at arix.com) --- Comment #2 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-15 02:46:17 EDT --- The .spec file states that it was generated by cpan2rpm. Is that true? mod_gnutls is not a perl module. The package does not build correctly. There are at least missing appropriate buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 06:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150650.n8F6ouuE022447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-15 02:50:54 EDT --- Not quite a complete review. I still have some rpmlint information to verify. But there's some stuff to fix or discuss so I might as well post what I have: Good: * Builds in koji * named according to the naming guidelines * licensed according to the GPLv3+ as specified in the spec file * license file included. * spec file is legible * source matches upstream * No file listed twice * Permissions set properly * Cleans the buildroot * Uses macros consistently * Headers in -devel package * No static libraries or libtool archives * Devel package Requires the base package NEEDSWORK: * It looks like all the libauth* files in the %{_libdir}/%{name}/ directory are plugins, not shared libs. No need to run ldconfig for the subpackages that just contain those types of shared objects. * There's no libraries in %{_libdir}. RPATH is being used to load the needed libraries from %{_libdir}/%{name}/ (libcourierauth.so, libcourierauthcommon.so). The Packaging Guidelines specify that this should be done with a file in %{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/ instead: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath I also wonder why we don't just put libcourier* directly into %{_libdir}? * Nothing owns %{_libdir}/%{name} or %{_libexecdir}/%{name} or %{_sysconfdir}/authlib I suggest the base package does this. * rpmlint courier-authlib.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/authlib/authdaemonrc.dist courier-authlib-ldap.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/authlib/authldaprc.dist courier-authlib-mysql.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/authlib/authmysqlrc.dist courier-authlib-pgsql.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/authlib/authpgsqlrc.dist - It looks like all of these *rc.dist files are just vanilla versions of the *rc config files. Why do we distribute these at all? [Some more rpmlint messages will be posted in a followup] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150700.n8F70djr024325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-15 03:00:37 EDT --- Hi Eelko, Sorry, I've been busy with life. I will finish the review later this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150712.n8F7Ca1V010815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 03:12:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > nah. url was correct, I just hadn't updated the website to include info on > this utility (I'm the packager and author) Maybe you can also fix the license ambiguity between website and tarball. According to the file header comments, the package is licensed under GPLv2+ while the website mentions GPLv3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150734.n8F7Y15Q031738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.28.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150735.n8F7Zr4Z032560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150734.n8F7YM48015568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #11 from Erick Calder 2009-09-15 03:34:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Maybe you can also fix the license ambiguity between website and tarball. done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150733.n8F7XucM015311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:33:28 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150735.n8F7ZnIj016428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:35:48 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150736.n8F7a8Lq016501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4.01-6.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150734.n8F7YSEC015728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:34:27 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-email-address-validation'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150736.n8F7a4Sp000371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:36:02 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150739.n8F7dY0P017746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:39:32 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mathgl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150742.n8F7gblv002666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:42:37 EDT --- vrq-1.0.58-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150742.n8F7ggPC002704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.58-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150742.n8F7gtvj002765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:42:54 EDT --- mathgl-1.9-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mathgl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150744.n8F7iPhl003186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:44:24 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update givaro'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9580 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150743.n8F7hNcA002873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:43:21 EDT --- givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update givaro'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150746.n8F7ks5w020327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:46:52 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150747.n8F7lkP1020549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:47:45 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: python-hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150749.n8F7nqQt005531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-15 03:49:51 EDT --- third ping? I'll close this bug if there is no response within 4 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150746.n8F7kFo5004500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:46:13 EDT --- ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150749.n8F7nbFW005446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150746.n8F7kQu6004556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:46:25 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-sphinx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150751.n8F7p9Nq022071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:51:07 EDT --- vrq-1.0.58-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7rAId022746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.6.4-1.fc11 Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150751.n8F7pE2C022115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.58-3.fc10 |1.0.58-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150752.n8F7qtcI007103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:52:54 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7retd007373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:53:39 EDT --- synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150755.n8F7tdBf008246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:55:38 EDT --- synergy-plus-1.3.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7rQ1i007272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:53:25 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150755.n8F7thiR008277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.4-3.fc10 |1.3.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7rWCU007313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.28.0-1.fc11 |0.28.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150753.n8F7rjjJ007416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.4-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7sQ6I007619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:54:25 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-sphinx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9619 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7s14G007481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:54:00 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-email-address-validation'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9616 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7sL6q007583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:54:19 EDT --- graphem-0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update graphem'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7so6Z023678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:54:49 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7vKeP024581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.4-1.fc11 |1.6.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7sVKR023581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:54:30 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150754.n8F7sbZH023625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.01-6.fc11 |1.4.01-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7v537009204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:57:05 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10, koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150757.n8F7vcCZ009302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:57:37 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150756.n8F7u0w4008465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 03:55:59 EDT --- Err, the file header of dyndns still mentions GPLv2+: # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. You should update this too. And if you leave the addition "or (at your option) any later version" the license tag is GPLv3+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150800.n8F802HP025335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(e at arix.com) | --- Comment #3 from Erick Calder 2009-09-15 04:00:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The .spec file states that it was generated by cpan2rpm. Is that true? > mod_gnutls is not a perl module no, sorry. I built the spec file by modifying one generated by c2r and never looked all the way up there. I've fixed it > The package does not build correctly. There are at least missing appropriate > buildrequires. hmm... I've added gnutls-devel (+ other patches) and produced release -2 (ready for review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523371] New: Review Request: gnustep-gui - GNUstep GUI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnustep-gui - GNUstep GUI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523371 Summary: Review Request: gnustep-gui - GNUstep GUI library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/gnustep-gui-0.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a library of graphical user interface classes written completely in the Objective-C language; the classes are based upon the OpenStep specification as released by NeXT Software, Inc. The library has been enhanced in a number of ways to take advantage of the GNU system. These classes include graphical objects such as buttons, text fields, popup lists, browser lists, and windows; there are also many associated classes for handling events, colors, fonts, pasteboards and images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150814.n8F8EBlM028965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #13 from Erick Calder 2009-09-15 04:13:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Err, the file header of dyndns still mentions GPLv2+: eek. ok, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150819.n8F8JuST014598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(e at arix.com) --- Comment #4 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-15 04:19:55 EDT --- It still does not build. It's missing buildrequires for httpd-devel at least. Please try to build the package in mock. Then try running rpmlint on the src.rpm and binary packages. Please also update the .src.rpm link here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150819.n8F8JcwO014539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(jochen at herr-schmi | |tt.de) --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 04:19:37 EDT --- I forgot that you're already working on packaging this too. I just finished packaging up a separate packaging of gnustep-gui, and we should definitely merge the effort -- do you want to be the primary maintainer, in which case I'll review yours, or the other way around? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523371 (once we decide, we'll make one bug request a duplicate of the other) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150818.n8F8IiOC014419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-15 04:18:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > nah. url was correct, I just hadn't updated the website to include info on > this utility (I'm the packager and author) I know. ;) > I read the link but don't see anything wrong with the name. what are you > suggesting? Give this app a proper name. "dyndns" is a protocol or a generic term, but not a name. We don't have "email", "smpt", "pop" or "parser" in Fedora, because if we allowed names like these, we would have collisions pretty soon. "dyndns" also sounds like a claim that this is the best or the official dyndns client, although it only handles afraid.org but no other dyndns services. You are the author, you can name this program whatever you like, but please don't call it "dyndns". (In reply to comment #8) > well... what I don't like about %ghost is that when I do rpm -ql I want to see > my cache file. that file is useful since it contains the external IP address > of my system and unless I can have it included in the listing, I won't > necessarily know where it is True, but the file should not be included as a normal file because this will confuse rpm -V. BTW: /var/cache/dyndns shouldn't be a file but a directory containing that file. Each app using /var/cache/ is supposed to have a directory of it's own. Reading the definitions in http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARCACHEAPPLICATIONCACHEDATA I'm not even sure if /var/cache/ is the proper place, but I have no better suggestion ether. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523371] Review Request: gnustep-gui - GNUstep GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150820.n8F8KVIe030900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523371 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 04:20:30 EDT --- Note: potential duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 -- reviewers, don't close yet; still deciding which one should be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150822.n8F8MQ75031119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-15 04:21:42 EDT --- The SRP support is disabled in our gnutls package, so it should not be advertised in the mod_gnutls description. I don't know whether mod_gnutls supports PSK, but this is enabled in our gnutls package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150825.n8F8PAbY031949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 04:25:07 EDT --- Status update: gnustep-base is *almost* done. We might push oolite 1.65 as that is the easier job, and would serve as a nice sanity test for our GNUstep set-up, but what would really be interesting is packaging oolite 1.73.3 (the current test release; a lot of the new add-ons require >= 1.71). Thing is, the 1.7x series all bundle Mozilla's SpiderMonkey JS engine -- an older copy, circa v1.70. This is rather verboten according to the packaging guidelines (see fedora-devel for the current rsync vs zsync and bundled zlib mess). I'm asking upstream whether oolite could actually use the system-provided JS library, and we'll decide from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150829.n8F8TCa0032502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #32 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-15 04:29:11 EDT --- PS see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523371 for document-handling. Unfortunately, the GNUstep team has not updated their docs makefiles to use gnustep-config, so the makefile location still has to be specified manually (or the GNUstep.sh file sourced, I suppose) I'm asking the Infrastructure team for a gnustep-specific mailing list; once that is set up, the next thing is probably to finalize our GNUstep packaging guidelines. I think I have an older file lying around in my Wiki space somewhere, but IIRC that dates back to when we were still arguing over how FHS-compliant we should be. Eek. Would welcome your help hashing out specific guidelines :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 08:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150834.n8F8YGWT018510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150906.n8F96U9X025111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-15 05:06:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I read the link but don't see anything wrong with the name. what are you > > suggesting? > > Give this app a proper name. "dyndns" is a protocol or a generic term, but not > a name. We don't have "email", "smpt", "pop" or "parser" in Fedora, because if > we allowed names like these, we would have collisions pretty soon. > > "dyndns" also sounds like a claim that this is the best or the official dyndns > client, although it only handles afraid.org but no other dyndns services. > > You are the author, you can name this program whatever you like, but please > don't call it "dyndns". Yes, it is rather confusing, especially since there is already http://www.dyndns.com/ who provide dynamical DNS services (their client is called ddclient). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150921.n8F9LqGw028303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-15 05:21:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Find New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mdbooth I'm happy to take ownership of this branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150922.n8F9M9LB028364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150927.n8F9Rwq6013206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Patrice FERLET changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(metal3d at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #28 from Patrice FERLET 2009-09-15 05:27:54 EDT --- I will add this on spec file. Let me some time to do this. My wedding is this week-end and I'm very very busy for 3-4 days :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150932.n8F9WDZd014139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-15 05:32:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-XPathEngine New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mdbooth alexlan Having been pointed to the procedure, I see alexlan isn't interested in EPEL but would like to be co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150932.n8F9WVqC030228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150931.n8F9VXNE030104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 09:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150931.n8F9VGPU030070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-15 05:31:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-XML-DOM-XPath New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mdbooth alexlan Having been pointed to the procedure, I see alexlan isn't interested in EPEL but would like to be co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 11:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] New: Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-FormatTable/perl-Text-FormatTable.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-FormatTable/perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Text::FormatTable renders simple tables as text. You pass to the constructor (new) a table format specification similar to LaTeX (e.g. r|l|5l|R|20L) and you call methods to fill the table data and insert rules. After the data is filled, you call the render method and the table gets formatted as text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 11:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151150.n8FBo9b5012059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 07:50:08 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 12:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151230.n8FCUgM9020712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 08:30:41 EDT --- Could you upload the files again? The above URLs are invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 13:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151317.n8FDHilu000335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #10 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-09-15 09:17:42 EDT --- It looks like it's abandonware. All my attempts to reach any of the maintainers have gone without response. I think this is a "cantfix." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 13:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151320.n8FDKQMH017865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-15 09:20:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Could you upload the files again? The above URLs are invalid. Please try them later (1 hour later should be enough), my webhosting company silently changed the IP addresses ... temporary place for SRPM: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/hercstudio-1.0-0.2.beta.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 13:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151328.n8FDSwDd003825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #46 from R P Herrold 2009-09-15 09:28:55 EDT --- This seems NOT to be making it through to RawHide .. is there a blocker? [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ srcfind sslogger /home/herrold/.tmp/srcfind.cache.txt sslogger nil [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 13:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151342.n8FDgFZB024088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 09:42:14 EDT --- The package does not build in mock because of a missing BR:alsa-lib-devel. According to the following rpmlint error you should also change the permissions of file _sphinx3.so to 755. The remaining warnings can be ignored. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm cmusphinx3-libs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libs3decoder.so.0.0.6 exit at GLIBC_2.0 cmusphinx3-libs.i586: W: no-documentation cmusphinx3-python.i586: W: no-documentation cmusphinx3-python.i586: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_sphinx3.so 0775 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 13:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151350.n8FDot49009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 09:50:54 EDT --- The documentation is quite extensive so that it's probably a good idea to put it in a -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 14:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151413.n8FEDr4j001126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 10:13:52 EDT --- ath_info-0-0.1.20090902svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ath_info-0-0.1.20090902svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 14:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151417.n8FEHSPv018089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-15 10:17:27 EDT --- A few minor issues of note: * When you make an updated package, it is useful to post updated links to the new SRPM in the review bug. (I found your -3 SRPM, but it might have been overlooked by a different reviewer) * You should try to use %{name} and %{version} in the Source0: line, this helps ensure that as you update the package, you don't accidentally build it against older source. * While technically correct to not explicitly list the patch level when applying Patch0, I generally recommend that packagers do so, especially to make it clear to someone who might inherit this package in the future. Basically, you'd change: %patch0 to %patch0 -p0 * I also generally recommend that packagers generate patches at patch level 1. If you use a suffix when making changes (e.g. Makefile.OLD), then it is simple to use the "gendiff" tool to generate a patch: gendiff quotatool-1.4.10 .BAD * It is also useful to use a relevant suffix when applying the patch in the spec file: %patch0 -p0 -b .destdir This can come in handy when trying to regenerate patches for future updates. * Also, patch naming is useful. You named your patch "Makefile.patch", I would recommend something like: quotatool-1.4.10-DESTDIR.patch * You should go ahead and send patches upstream whenever appropriate. In this case, enabling DESTDIR support is useful for all distributions, and harmless if it is not set, so it is appropriate to send it upstream. You can do this by emailing it to their mailing list, or opening a bug in their bug tracker. You should also put a link to wherever you sent the patch to upstream as a comment in the spec file: # Sent upstream: # http://foo.com/bar/bug12345 * One very minor point: In Fedora 10+, it is no longer necessary to call: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT immediately after %install. RPM now does this for you as the first step of %install. * You should get in the habit of running rpmlint against the SRPM and binary RPMs. For example, when I ran: [spot at pterodactyl ~]$ rpmlint /home/spot/rpmbuild/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-3.fc12.src.rpm /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/quotatool-1.4.10-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/spot/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/quotatool-debuginfo-1.4.10-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm quotatool.src:48: W: macro-in-%changelog doc quotatool.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Both of these are minor errors, but easily corrected. (You should use %% to escape out any macros used in changelog entries) Please show me an updated SRPM that incorporates fixes for the above items, and I will finish the review and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 14:44:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:44:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151444.n8FEiEJj025088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151520.n8FFKCfX021878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-15 11:20:11 EDT --- >From the spec file diff: -%{_datadir}/pyicq-t +%{_datadir}/pyicq-t/data Now the directory %{_datadir}/pyicq-t is no longer included: $ rpm -qf /usr/share/pyicq-t/ file /usr/share/pyicq-t is not owned by any package It can also be seen in "rpm -qlv" or "rpmls" output. Basically you would need to make sure that for every file path a 'd' entry is present: $ rpmls -p /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-4.fc11.noarch.rpm|grep ^d drwx------ /etc/pyicq-t drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5 drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/data drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/data/www drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/data/www/css drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/data/www/images drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/chardet_utf drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/langs drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/legacy drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/legacy/services drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/services drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/tlib drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/web drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t/src/xdb drwxr-xr-x /var/run/pyicq-t drwx------ /var/spool/pyicq-t => Missing is: drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t [...] -touch %{buildroot}/etc/pyicq-t/config.xml +cp config_example.xml %{buildroot}/etc/pyicq-t/config.xml This doesn't achieve what you think it does (according to %changelog). The problem here is that the file is made a %ghost. This also means that somebody (a person or a program) must create it after package installation, or else it won't exist like normal files. [...] The new initscript no longer displays the service name: $ sudo service pyicq-t status (pid 47117) is running... $ sudo service pyicq-t status is stopped [...] Conclusively, just as with ordinary package reviews, after a package has been included in the Fedora Package collection, you are on your own with updates which bear a risk of introducing new problems. One can beat a package to death during review, and with the next update/upgrade some packagers still add stuff that won't pass an official review. You know where to find the packaging guidelines. You are willing to study them in order to make packages adhere to them. But the guidelines don't help with all sorts of problems. In particular, they don't cover run-time issues and lack of testing. So, if I approve your account for the packager group, you can request commit access as planned. Continue to be careful. Test your changes painstakingly. It should become more easy as you're two package maintainers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151523.n8FFNkv1004287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 11:23:42 EDT --- Ed, would you actually build this package with koji? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151529.n8FFTFmK024844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-15 11:29:14 EDT --- Well, quick review as this is simple package. rpmlint OK build (local OK) (in Koji OK) (archs OK) name OK URL & sources OK sources MD5 OK license OK (GPLv2+) buildroot OK works OK I'm not sure about versioning - in upstream tarball kde-4.3.1 is in version tag, in some other own packages we omit it. We should be consistent in versioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 15:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151545.n8FFjHAO028925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #14 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-15 11:45:16 EDT --- quotatool-1.4.10-4 seems clean now with rpmlint. SPEC file: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/quotatool.spec SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151606.n8FG63KO016431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-15 12:06:02 EDT --- Your patch is backwards, and does not apply. When making the patch, before making any code changes, make a backup of the file you plan to edit: cp Makefile Makefile.old Then, edit the Makefile (leave Makefile.old alone): vi Makefile # make changes here and save as Makefile Then, generate the patch. Somehow, you did it backwards. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151609.n8FG93ik001841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-15 12:09:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-base Short Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Base CMPI Providers Owners: praveenp hamzy srini Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: praveenp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151616.n8FGGt1w004518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-15 12:16:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Your patch is backwards, and does not apply. Maybe it's just been generated (manually) the wrong way? $ diff new orig instead of $ diff orig new (the way it's supposed to be done according to the man page). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151620.n8FGKRXX005285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 12:20:25 EDT --- Well, now this package itself is okay, so: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few (or no) work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151620.n8FGKIZ1020755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-15 12:20:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot Short Description: Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library Owners: orion Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151646.n8FGkH9Y013284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-15 12:46:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ksplice New Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151654.n8FGsePZ031058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 12:54:38 EDT --- OK, thanks. I will do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151657.n8FGvYKn015764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-15 12:57:32 EDT --- Update to 0.6.1 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/zsync-0.6/zsync-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Still the internal zlib problem! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 16:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151656.n8FGuDs3015515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 12:56:12 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (RackTables) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151722.n8FHMLiR021695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #27 from Pascal Parois 2009-09-15 13:22:17 EDT --- Yes, I applied the patch. http://fedora.debroglie.net/SRPMS/11/newmat-11-2.fc11.debroglie.src.rpm http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/newmat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151725.n8FHPnGL022517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-15 13:25:48 EDT --- Changed the version to 0.5.1beta from a svn checkout. New spec and SRPM uploaded. Spec Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge.spec SRPM Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint skrooge.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/skrooge*-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ koji build --scratch dist-f12 ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:02:48 5.40 MiB 32.93 KiB/sec Created task: 1680960 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1680960 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1680960 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1680961 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): free 1680964 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, i686): free 1680963 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free 1680962 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): free 1680962 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): free -> open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1680964 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, i686): free -> open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1680961 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): free -> open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1680963 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free -> open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1680962 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 1680964 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 1680963 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 1680961 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 1680960 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1680960 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta1.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151729.n8FHT3kZ023320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 13:29:01 EDT --- seeker-3.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seeker-3.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520701] Review Request: seeker - Random access disk benchmark utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151730.n8FHU9IG008103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520701 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 13:30:09 EDT --- seeker-3.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seeker-3.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151749.n8FHnjhs028327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 13:49:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Updated SRPM and Spec: > SRPM: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder-2.28.1-4.fc10.src.rpm > Spec file: http://benl.co.uk/files/srpms/dieharder/dieharder.spec > > Could this be reviewed now, please? Seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151752.n8FHqsD7029264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nimbius at sdf.lones | |tar.org) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-15 13:52:52 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151756.n8FHuS6u014364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Lewis 2009-09-15 13:56:27 EDT --- Sorry about that. Must have missed then when I rebuilt my server. I will upload them to fedorapeople.org when I get home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151759.n8FHxhe4030585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 13:59:42 EDT --- rfkill-0.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rfkill-0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 17:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151759.n8FHxg5t014756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 18:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151812.n8FIC5t5018293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 David Lawrence changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo- | Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-15 14:12:04 EDT --- Good review so far. > I'm not sure about `%{__mkdir} -p > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/'. That's a directory that belongs into package "hicolor-icon-theme". This game only stores a single %{name}.png in that directory, used by the desktop menu entry. Adding "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" would be more accurate and would avoid unowned directories. Alternatively, the single file could be moved to /usr/share/pixmaps. > Requires: SDL See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > BuildRequires: SDL-devel >= 1.2.0. SDL in Fedora is > 1.2.0 for a very long time. > %configure --bindir=%{_bindir} --datadir=%{_datadir} > --localstatedir=%{_localstatedir}/games The first two arguments are the default. Compare with "rpm --eval %configure". > %{__cp} %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applnk/Applications/%{name}.desktop Why do you copy it there only to remove it again when copying it elsewhere with desktop-file-install? > MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. > Ok. It ought to be "Rogue-like" not "roguelike", though. > %changelog > - initiql package s/initiql/initial/ ;) > File listed twice: /var/games/ivan/ivan-highscore.scores' This is because the directory is included recursively and the highscores files is also included explicitly. The directory entry could be marked %dir. > Patch1: %{name}-%{version}-fedora.patch Dubious. The C++ fixes and the Makefile patch could be split into two patches. So when a compiler update required further fixes, you could simply rediff/enhance the C++ specific patch. But why is a patch to config.log and config.status included? Those are files created at build-time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 18:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151833.n8FIXWWA006716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-15 14:33:30 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681128 upstream source verified: md5sum *.gz 33c555a9eee0cdfd68ae9050f6502069 kio-ftps-0.2.tar.gz $ rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings Fairly simple and clean. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 18:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151839.n8FId98v007813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #2 from Steve Milner 2009-09-15 14:39:09 EDT --- Updated: $ sha1sum ncrack-0.01-1.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm ncrack.spec 1cb7b4ea93d56bf23d6f5e00e3bb0984ab266e3b ncrack-0.01-1.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm 9689d5cab38d70fb18b9811e44a96e6fbeb37965 ncrack.spec Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-1.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 19:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151925.n8FJPm2B017755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 15:25:47 EDT --- The build requires hercules >= 3.06-4 which is not available yet. Are you planning to create another hercules release? I wasn't able to run hercules-3.0.6-3 in HerculesStudio (see below) but maybe I simply missed a configuration setting, as I'm not familiar with hercules and its configuration. :) It works on the command-line though. The package itself is set up properly. I couldn't find anything to be corrected. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/hercstudio-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - GPLv3+ according to the source file headers - COPYING contains GPLv3 license text [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: COPYING must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 hash of the tarball I've checked out doesn't match those of the tarball in the src rpm. However, the content of both files is identical (checked with hg diff) [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681013 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [.] MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - package not relocatable [.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - doesn't create directories [+] MUST: File must not be listed more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - %doc only contains file COPYING [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files packaged [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no pkgconfig files [.] MUST: .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - no shared libs [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency - no devel subpackage [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. - no .la files [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - hercstudio.desktop added as %Source1 - .desktop file is valid - .desktop file is properly installed with desktop-file-install [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - koji scratch build successful (see above) [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - HerculesStudio requires hercules >= 3.06-4 which is not available yet - I decreased the dependency to 3.06-3 and installed the package available in bodhi - I wasn't able to get hercules run in HerculesStudio. It terminates with "unable to open DLL dyngui: file not found" [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets needed [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - no subpackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 19:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523523] New: Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Summary: Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-gesture.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-gesture-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library allows clutter applications to be aware of gestures and to easily attach some handlers to the gesture events. The library supports both single and multi touch. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 19:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151938.n8FJcIm0004692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 15:38:18 EDT --- Could you provide links to the updated files (release 2)? The URLs given above point to the initial ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 19:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909151937.n8FJbIUe004555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-15 15:37:17 EDT --- My apologies; I was in the process of reviewing this, but something came up and I haven't been able to get back to it. I'll take care of it this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 19:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523526] New: Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Summary: Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-box2d.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-box2d-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A glue layer between clutter and box2d that provides a special group where the actors can be set to be static or dynamic in regard to a physics simulation. Features: - Children of the ClutterBox2d group can be simulated as static or dynamic rigid bodies. Collision detection. - Specifying the gravity of the world. - play/pause control over the box2d physics engine - Setting linear and angular velocities of simulated children. - automatic position synchronization between clutter and box2d. - joints - prismatic. - revolute. - distance (spring) - mouse (for dragging objects around and manipulating them). koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 20:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152004.n8FK44nA009937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #4 from Steve Milner 2009-09-15 16:04:03 EDT --- $ sha1sum ncrack.spec ncrack-0.01-2.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm 6c7acea31b496bfa4d997f4439f41fb669605565 ncrack.spec e308b3e578998808879e89867c167ea8f85b6fbb ncrack-0.01-2.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-2.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 20:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152017.n8FKH4oC012980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #17 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-15 16:17:03 EDT --- Yeh, that's what I was asking about on IRC. It seems correct that we are allowed to edit the Makefile, and then Makefile.OLD is the original Makefile. I was under the impression that you create something like Makefile2 which differs from Makefile, and generate a patch from that, to patch Makefile. Anyway, new build: SPEC file: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/quotatool.spec SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 20:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152016.n8FKGA3A012833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Andreas Osowski 2009-09-15 16:16:09 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [makerpm at hattan libvmime07]$ rpmlint libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [makerpm at hattan libvmime07]$ rpmlint libvmime07-devel-0.7.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm libvmime07-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [makerpm at hattan libvmime07]$ rpmlint libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 30fefbdd31c2fa46976984f18d4d21bf3c2ec20a [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: - [-] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: None ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 20:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152050.n8FKo07e021823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-09-15 16:49:59 EDT --- Andreas, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libvmime07 Short Description: A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152100.n8FL0TjE008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:00:26 EDT --- libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152101.n8FL12CP025815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:01:01 EDT --- libkni3-3.9.2-12.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152101.n8FL185d025850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.9.2-12.fc10 |3.9.2-12.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152100.n8FL0ZkH025690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.9.2-12.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152101.n8FL1ap6025953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:01:35 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gtk-splitter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9647 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] New: Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Summary: Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://openslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/tmp/openslide.spec SRPM URL: http://openslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/tmp/openslide-2.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The OpenSlide library allows programs to access virtual slide files regardless of the underlying image format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152101.n8FL1GSh009187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 17:01:15 EDT --- gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gtk-splitter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9645 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] New: Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Summary: Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker-0-0.1.20090915cvs.fc11.src.rpm DeESCRIPTION: opentracker is a open and free bittorrent tracker project. It aims for minimal resource usage and is intended to run at your wlan router. Currently it is deployed as an open and free tracker instance RPMLINT: opentracker.i586: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/opentracker The package installs a statically linked binary or object file. Usually this is a packaging bug. If not, contact your rpmlint distributor about this so that this error gets included in the exception file for rpmlint and will not be flagged as a packaging bug in the future (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). opentracker.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/opentracker The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't define a proper .note.GNU-stack section. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152116.n8FLGY0R014093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-15 17:16:33 EDT --- please do not start a review. this package need some more love. i will do this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152119.n8FLJw8b031600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Matthew Harmsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mharmsen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-09-15 17:19:56 EDT --- The referenced packaging guideline appears to mandate a source code change without any particular security or performance rationale. As this cross-platform code must run on both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms on multiple architectures, and has been successfully utilized on a number of different JVM versions from multiple vendors over the course of the past decade, upstream does not accept this change without a more sound security or performance rationale. Additionally, the packaging logic follows the example of a closely related existing Fedora JNI library package called JSS (e. g. - from a machine running 32-bit Fedora 11): # rpm -qlv jss -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 681931 Aug 21 01:34 /usr/lib/java/jss4-4.2.6.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Aug 21 01:34 /usr/lib/java/jss4.jar -> jss4-4.2.6.jar -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 176840 Aug 21 01:34 /usr/lib/libjss4.so drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Aug 21 01:34 /usr/share/doc/jss-4.2.6 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25755 Dec 14 2008 /usr/share/doc/jss-4.2.6/MPL-1.1.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17987 Dec 14 2008 /usr/share/doc/jss-4.2.6/gpl.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4680 Apr 25 2004 /usr/share/doc/jss-4.2.6/jss.html -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26436 Dec 14 2008 /usr/share/doc/jss-4.2.6/lgpl.txt However, in an effort to obtain more detailed information in this area, I am cc'ing Andrew Haley of the Open JDK community for any known security/performance issues regarding the use of "System.loadLibrary()" versus "System.load()". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152149.n8FLnF0b006220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-15 17:49:14 EDT --- * since this is a pre-release, the revision tag must be 0.X.ALPHA%{?dist} where X is the revision number to increment (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease) * as far as I can see, Requires: openssl is not necessary * remove COPYING.OpenSSL from %doc because it's not part of the package (openssl is bundled with the tarball for Windows builds) * the changelog entries should contain information about the things that have been changed, so that the file history can be reproduced, e.g. - updated license tag to GPLv2 with restrictions - preserve timestamp of file COPYING.OpenSSH instead of - Updated for package review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 21:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152157.n8FLvY3L022455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-09-15 17:57:33 EDT --- Thanks, Martin. I've added the missing BR and split out a -doc subpackage. I also added one more patch to fix a weak symbol issue. I don't know what to say about the permissions on _sphinx3.so. Here's what I know: 1) Rpmlint is complaining that the permissions *are* 0775, not that they should be 0775. 2) The permissions should be 0775. 3) I don't get that warning from rpmlint on my x86_64 machine. As far as I can tell, there is nothing to fix there and rpmlint shouldn't be complaining for you. New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3-0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 22:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152210.n8FMAwfm025189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-15 18:10:57 EDT --- I can drop the kde4.3.1 tag from Release if you prefer, I'm not particularly attached to it (i.e. I'm fine with removing it). (But the guidelines do allow non-numeric versioning tags after the disttag.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 22:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] New: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Summary: Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lpoetter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Mutex Tracer mutracer is a mutex tracer/profiler. The package should be easy to review. See this for more information: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/mutrace.html If you run this through rpmlint you'll get invalid-soname and shared-lib-calls-exit warnings. Both are safe to be ignored. The former is expected since this is not a library applications are supposed to link to, it's intended only for LD_PRELOAD. This is similar to libpulsedsp.so. The latter too is expected since we actually hook into the different variations of exit() to print our statistics summary. After printing that we call the real implementations of those calls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 23:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152306.n8FN6v00029354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #16 from Erick Calder 2009-09-15 19:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > "dyndns" also sounds like a claim that this is the best or the official dyndns > client, although it only handles afraid.org but no other dyndns services. so everyone ok if I call it "afraid-dyndns"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 23:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152310.n8FNAiS3012443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #17 from Erick Calder 2009-09-15 19:10:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Reading the definitions in > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#VARCACHEAPPLICATIONCACHEDATA > I'm not even sure if /var/cache/ is the proper place, but I have no better > suggestion ether. from reading the link above I'm convinced this is the right place for it > /var/cache/dyndns shouldn't be a file but a directory containing that > file. Each app using /var/cache/ is supposed to have a directory of it's own. there's no mention in that document that leads me to believe I should create a directory... though, if I did, would you have me ghost it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 23:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152323.n8FNN8mJ001875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Colin Coe 2009-09-15 19:23:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: RackTables Short Description: A datacenter asset management system Owners: coec Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: coec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 23:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909152345.n8FNj0mi024053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-15 19:44:57 EDT --- I got a 404 on the spec and realized you already changed it. Fine. REVIEW FOR e5168e16cd03c7f4bd3d01358a098056 gnome-applets-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc12.src.rpm FIX - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/gnome-applets-window-picker-* gnome-applets-window-picker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) gnome-applets-window-picker-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package gnome-applets-window-picker. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. there is nothing we can do about the latter, but please fix the first one, although it's just cosmetic. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv3 OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 aeda4b063a0233920b0186bca4495fef OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: no ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - compiler flags honored OK - debuginfo complete OK - Provides: are sane. Issues: Fix - Make is not verbose: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chris/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD/window-picker-applet-0.5.6/src' CC task-item.o CC applet.o CC task-list.o CC task-title.o CCLD window-picker-applet Use make %{?_smp_mflags} V=1 Add Requires: gnome-panel because the package only requires gnome-panel-libs currently. IMO you should add ChangeLog to %doc Rename the package, fix these and consider this package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 00:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160035.n8G0Zhhm008777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #6 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-15 20:35:41 EDT --- [[> Patch1: %{name}-%{version}-fedora.patch Dubious. The C++ fixes and the Makefile patch could be split into two patches. So when a compiler update required further fixes, you could simply rediff/enhance the C++ specific patch. But why is a patch to config.log and config.status included? Those are files created at build-time. ]] I'm not entirely sure... I suppose I need to dist-clean before I generate the patch, correct? I've implemented both of your suggestions (thank you both very much!) and will rebuild the rpm after I get the patch all ironed out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 00:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160035.n8G0Z0Xa025665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew | |.edu) | --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-15 20:34:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I used cpanspec (recommended by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl) > to verify I'd get something similar to your spec file. There were only two > non-trivial differences: > - Your specfile has: %{?perl_default_filter} - I did not find it mentioned in > the guidelines, but I found some BZs explaining it and I believe it is > correct. The %perl_default_filter is a relatively new innovation: by policy no package is permitted to either provide from or require for anything under %_docdir, yet RPM insists on doing just that.... %perl_default_filter prevents %_docdir dep issues, as well as preventing any shared library provides from creeping in (which doesn't do anything here, as this is a noarch package). > - My generated specfile has: Requires: perl(Task::Weaken) > Perhaps you should add it? Or explain to me why it should not be there. cpanspec adds as Requires deps that the metadata files (typically Makefile.PL) included with the tarball say it should; however long standing convention is to not use these explicit requires and allow the auto dep/prov scripts to take a stab at it. The scripts don't always do a great job (particularly w.r.t. versioned deps), as the typical way to express dependencies is through included metadata files. I've been playing with different ways to manage these deps explicly, but as I'm not ready to recommend changes to the guidelines yet... and as such I don't have any explicit Requires in at the moment. Sound good? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 00:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160053.n8G0roAV031649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-15 20:53:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > from reading the link above I'm convinced this is the right place for it Ok, fine with me. > there's no mention in that document that leads me to believe I should create a > directory... though, if I did, would you have me ghost it? Nope, include the dir and ghost the file. Then people might get a clue that there is something inside, e.g. %dir %{_localstatedir}/cache/afraid-dyndns %ghost %{_localstatedir}/cache/afraid-dyndns/afraid I wouldn't say that the separate dir is a must for you as upstream developer, it's just a recommendation for packaging in Fedora similar to libexecdir: "%{_libexecdir}. Packagers are highly encouraged to store libexecdir files in a package-specific subdirectory of %{_libexecdir}, such as %{_libexecdir}/%{name}." see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir This may also help with SELinux issues, I know this from bad experience. :( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518068#c11 BTW: Does everything work with SELinux enabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 00:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160052.n8G0q0kx014028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #50 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-15 20:51:55 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 01:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160103.n8G13Kc4002212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gnome-applets-window-picker |gnome-applet-window-picker |- Window picker applet for |- Window picker applet for |GNOME |GNOME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 01:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applets-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160103.n8G132v9017306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-15 21:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Add Requires: gnome-panel Uhh, the guidelines have changed recently. This should be a versioned dependency as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 01:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160118.n8G1IEuJ022061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 21:18:13 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 03:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160311.n8G3BATr032343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #7 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-15 23:11:09 EDT --- http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/ivan-0.50-1.fc11.src.rpm http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/ivan.spec Latest build, incorporating both Krzesimir and Michael's suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 04:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160450.n8G4oW3a016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-16 00:50:31 EDT --- Ah, no, you did not imply that. It's just that between two preliminary reviews on two FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets, and someone with a very similar name to you being a sponsor in the account system, I added up 2 + 2 = 5. Thanks for clarifying; I'm assigning myself the review; will sponsor at the end of the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 05:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] New: Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ Alias: perl-Try-Tiny https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Summary: Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Try-Tiny OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Try-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Try-Tiny-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The main focus of this module is to provide simple and reliable error handling for those having a hard time installing TryCatch, but who still want to write correct 'eval' blocks without 5 lines of boilerplate each time. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681981 Additional Comment: This is an additional dep of the latest GA Moose. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 05:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] New: Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 Summary: Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/swish-e.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/swish-e-2.4.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description of problem: Swish-e can quickly and easily index directories of files or remote web sites and search the generated indexes. Swish-e is extremely fast in both indexing and searching, highly configurable, and can be seamlessly integrated with existing web sites to maintain a consistent design. Swish-e can index web pages, but can just as easily index text files, mailing list archives, or data stored in a relational database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160603.n8G630Qi011012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #1 from Mel Chua 2009-09-16 02:02:59 EDT --- The ep5 version of the RPM has been successfully deployed and used on the publictest version of Fedora Insight. See http://publictest6.fedoraproject.org/zikula/index.php/News/2009/8/17/First-test-article/#comments for the glory. All RPMs and SRPMs are available at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-EZComments/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160617.n8G6HrJj030896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #67 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 02:17:49 EDT --- $ rpmbuild --rebuild http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.3-1.fc12.src.rpm : -- lua -> /usr/bin/lua -- luadoc -> /usr/bin/luadoc -- convert not found. CMake Error at awesomeConfig.cmake:41 (message): convert is required to build awesome Call Stack (most recent call first): awesomeConfig.cmake:62 (a_find_program) CMakeLists.txt:15 (include) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! I think you need "BuildRequires: ImageMagick" btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160629.n8G6Tk2C000794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(e at arix.com) | --- Comment #6 from Erick Calder 2009-09-16 02:29:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It still does not build. It's missing buildrequires for httpd-devel at least. > Please try to build the package in mock. Then try running rpmlint on the > src.rpm and binary packages. ok. I got mock set up and figured out how to use it. I've successfully rebuilt the package (included httpd-devel, which was needed for apxs) > Please also update the .src.rpm link here. I can't figure out how to edit my original message so here's the new link: http://www.arix.com/ftp/rpmz/src/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-3.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #5) > The SRP support is disabled in our gnutls package, so it should not be > advertised in the mod_gnutls description. removed from the README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 06:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160646.n8G6kbac018357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-16 02:46:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1) Rpmlint is complaining that the permissions *are* 0775, not that they should > be 0775. > 2) The permissions should be 0775. Sorry for my unclear comment. I thought it's necessary to change the permissions to 0755 because rpmlint doesn't seem to like 0775 and all .so files in my site-packages folder are also set to 0755. I get this error not just in an i586 environment but also on a x86_64 system running Fedora 11. However, I'm not a python expert. If you say 0775 is necessary, I can't say anything against that at the moment. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160719.n8G7JTEU024139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160718.n8G7IqRg024064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160724.n8G7Oq75025198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(justin.gallardo at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-16 03:24:50 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160741.n8G7fWgn028942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 Justin Gallardo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(justin.gallardo at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #8 from Justin Gallardo 2009-09-16 03:41:31 EDT --- I would like to keep working on it, but just haven't been able to find the time. I think I will have this coming weekend though. I'll get back with the changes I make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160752.n8G7qP3b016556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #9 from Colin Coe 2009-09-16 03:52:23 EDT --- - Stop packaging duplicate files - Fix summary line - Change references to 'exemples' to 'examples' http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.8.1.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160753.n8G7rKE7031343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-09-16 03:53:18 EDT --- Looks like I jumped the gun on this one. Its listed at http://borel.slu.edu/crubadan/apps.html but the .zip has gone away again for now. Asking around it seems that the .zip was an early package and the current status is "I'll let you know if [my collaborators] have something suitable for release." We could close this as CANTFIX for now and re-open when the status changes upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160754.n8G7spEV017003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-16 03:54:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t.spec SRPM URL: http://www.seekline.net/fedora/pyicq-t-0.8.1.5-5.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #11) > From the spec file diff: > > -%{_datadir}/pyicq-t > +%{_datadir}/pyicq-t/data [...] > => Missing is: > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/pyicq-t Yeah this was the problem. Due to the change of "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" I also changed the directories. The tip to have a look at "rpmls ... | grep ^d" is really good. I checked everything again and should be fine now. > -touch %{buildroot}/etc/pyicq-t/config.xml > +cp config_example.xml %{buildroot}/etc/pyicq-t/config.xml > > This doesn't achieve what you think it does (according to %changelog). The > problem here is that the file is made a %ghost. This also means that somebody > (a person or a program) must create it after package installation, or else it > won't exist like normal files. Quite right. I also removed the ghost entry to create a default config file. > The new initscript no longer displays the service name: > > $ sudo service pyicq-t status > (pid 47117) is running... > > $ sudo service pyicq-t status > is stopped Argl, changed this one too. Had a look at other init scripts how they handle this and changed it accordingly. Actually only a "$prog" was missing. One question left. In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript they show a init script template. The sha-bang points to "/bin/sh" but my init script uses "/bin/bash". I guess this is no problem, because about 30 other packages installed on my Fedora system are using bash too. Or should we prefer /bin/sh? I know that /bin/sh is only a symlink to bash but maybe someday Fedora will change this behaviour? Yesterday and today I did quite a lot of tests. Installed/removed the package etc. The default config file is now created fine. Also the status of the init script works fine. I checked every allowed init script argument and they all seem to work fine. Additionally I checked all files listed by rpmls. rpmlint still shows only the warnings/errors which are OK and shown in comment #10. Fifth release is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 07:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160759.n8G7xtqp032709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-16 03:59:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kio-ftps Short Description: An ftps KIO slave for KDE Owners: jreznik rdieter ltinkl than kkofler svahl Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 08:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160802.n8G82MKY018980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-16 04:02:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I can drop the kde4.3.1 tag from Release if you prefer, I'm not particularly > attached to it (i.e. I'm fine with removing it). Well, please remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 08:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160815.n8G8FxSo022390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #19 from Erick Calder 2009-09-16 04:15:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I wouldn't say that the separate dir is a must for you as upstream developer, > it's just a recommendation for packaging in Fedora done. new srpm at: ftp://arix.com/rpmz/src/afraid-dyndns-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm > BTW: Does everything work with SELinux enabled? no idea - I have it disabled in my box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 08:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160822.n8G8MPpC023790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #68 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 04:22:21 EDT --- Ok with a xcb patched cairo I then get to: -- Configuring awesome-version-internal.h -- Configuring awesome.doxygen -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! (same with 3.3.4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 08:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160823.n8G8NPJp023911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michal Schmidt 2009-09-16 04:23:23 EDT --- Thank you for the explanation. I approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 08:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160829.n8G8TveD025316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 09:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160913.n8G9DbhQ002166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Krzesimir Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Krzesimir Nowak 2009-09-16 05:13:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mm-common Short Description: common files for GNOME C++ bindings Owners: krnowak Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 09:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160934.n8G9YwRg021946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-16 05:34:56 EDT --- > rpmls ... | grep ^d Note, though, that more often you would omit the grep, because it would not reveal unowned directories that don't contain any sub-dirs. E.g. drwxr-xr-x /usr/data/foo -rw-r--r-- /usr/data/foo/file1 -rw-r--r-- /usr/data/foo/file2 -rw-r--r-- /usr/data/foo/bar/file3 (!) drwxr-xr-x /var/spool/foo When doing grep ^d, drwxr-xr-x /usr/data/foo drwxr-xr-x /var/spool/foo there would be no evidence that /usr/data/foo/bar is missing. [...] > The sha-bang points to "/bin/sh" but my init script uses "/bin/bash". It's "shebang". /bin/sh is LSB, but /bin/bash is a requirement of the "initscripts" package, too, and used in many of the scripts (not limited to rc.sysinit). Of course, if you have strong feelings about it, you could avoid using any bash-specific features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 09:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909160934.n8G9Ysv0006887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-16 05:34:53 EDT --- This is a Really Great addition to Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161016.n8GAGSfA030892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #12 from Minto Joseph 2009-09-16 06:16:26 EDT --- Hello Parag, Please check. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/ayttm.spec http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/ayttm-0.6.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] New: Package Review: qmpdclient Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: qmpdclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Summary: Package Review: qmpdclient Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: glua at 4-mail.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora QMPDClient is a Qt4 based MPD client which supports: * Covers * Lyrics * Tag guessing * Internet radio * Storing & using playlists * Last.fm track submission * Tray notification * Skinnable interface * OSD Version 1.1.1 Tarball: http://git.bitcheese.net/?a=archive&p=qmpdclient-ne&h=3c4b61f2aa02daee2b696a7d735680bb89d51b47&t=targz It's my first spec file so please excuse some flaws. I will do my best to improve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161050.n8GAokKZ005697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #1 from Julian G 2009-09-16 06:50:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361231) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361231) QMPDClient Spec File -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161052.n8GAqbee023883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #3 from Julian G 2009-09-16 06:52:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361233) Desktop File -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161051.n8GApnwU023739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #2 from Julian G 2009-09-16 06:51:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361232) Patch for Qt4 Project File -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161055.n8GAt7tU006654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #69 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-16 06:55:01 EDT --- Thanks added missing BuildRequires. 3.3.4 build fine for me at my ordinary system, but fails in mock this way: ... DEBUG: -- checking for modules 'glib-2.0;libev;cairo;x11;pango>=1.19.3;pangocairo>=1.19.3;xcb-randr;xcb-xtest;xcb-xinerama;xcb-event>=0.3.6;xcb-aux>=0.3.0;xcb-atom>=0.3.0;xcb-keysyms>=0.3.4;xcb-icccm>=0.3.3;xcb-image>=0.3.0;xcb-property>=0.3.0;cairo-xcb;libstartup-notification-1.0>=0.10;xproto>=7.0.15;imlib2;libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' DEBUG: -- package 'libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' not found ... And I am pretty sure libxdg-basedir-1.0.2 is installed, I can see it in mock DEBUG output... Can anyone see the same in fedora-rawhide-i386 mock with http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-1.fc12.src.rpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 10:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161058.n8GAwDLB007186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #70 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-16 06:58:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #65) > (In reply to comment #64) > > awesome v2 is near to dead code > > I know, but what about bug 465759? Well, Behdad feels it's upstream job to move with cairo-xcb, perhaps they don't see any benefits in that particular backend? > Feels like this is never going to happen? When cairo-xcb is non-experimental and fully supported. Never say never :). > > Is it possible to make a separate package for cairo-xcb? We've discussed this topic in this bug several times. I'd prefer not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB59Kt026638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502818] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB50N3026131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502818 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502834] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB52DL026245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502834 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB56Kd026579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503482] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB55Er026550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503482 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB5A4w026667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB54Fb026519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161104.n8GB4x9e026101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502843] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB53sV026489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503510] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161105.n8GB57Sj026609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503510 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrakus at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161107.n8GB7VP1027014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161111.n8GBBueT010085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-16 07:11:55 EDT --- Cleaned up desktop files. Got rid of Encoding= entrys. New spec and SRPM uploaded. Spec Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge.spec SRPM Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint skrooge.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/skrooge*-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ koji build --scratch dist-f12 ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:03:31 5.40 MiB 26.21 KiB/sec Created task: 1682511 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1682511 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1682511 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1682515 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1682512 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1682514 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free 1682513 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1682514 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free -> open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 1682515 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, i686): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 1682513 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 1682512 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 1682514 buildArch (skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 1682511 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1682511 build (dist-f12, skrooge-0.5.1-beta2.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 11:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161116.n8GBGkhi029461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #12 from Pascal Parois 2009-09-16 07:16:43 EDT --- I am updating this package and ran into an issue. The release version does not compile, so I would like to use the beta version instead (which is working) but the versioning is 1.8.X The current version I have is 1.8.1 which is "newer" than 1.8.X. :( I don't if the next version will be 1.8.2 or 1.9. Any comments welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 12:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161204.n8GC4oXw007741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 08:04:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The build requires hercules >= 3.06-4 which is not available yet. Are you > planning to create another hercules release? The N-V-R above is valid only for Rawhide, it will be (and needs to be) updated for F-11, F-10 and EL-5. > I wasn't able to run hercules-3.0.6-3 in HerculesStudio (see below) but maybe I > simply missed a configuration setting, as I'm not familiar with hercules and > its configuration. :) It works on the command-line though. You must open (or create) a config file (eg. Fedora/s390x from http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/spins/S390/) and then use Command/Power on from menu. It will show the devices on left and console output in the main window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 12:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161227.n8GCRG1B031808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #71 from Thomas Moschny 2009-09-16 08:27:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) > Thanks added missing BuildRequires. 3.3.4 build fine for me at my ordinary > system, but fails in mock this way: > DEBUG: -- package 'libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' not found The BR is wrong, it should be on libxdg-basedir-devel, not libxdg-basedir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 12:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161253.n8GCrRZN006377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #72 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-16 08:53:25 EDT --- Thanks Thomas, fixed here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-2.fc12.src.rpm (Builds fine in Mock.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 12:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161258.n8GCwmCS021850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-16 08:58:46 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-reviews]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-syslog-* sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libsyslogtimeparse.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libsyslogsettingparse.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libsyslogconfutil.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/syslog-service.sh sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libSyslog_ConfUtils.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libsysloglogutil.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libSyslog_LogUtils.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libSyslog_ServiceUtils.so sblim-cmpi-syslog.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libsyslogserviceutil.so sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/system/linux/setting sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/runtest_pegasus.sh sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/runtest_wbemcli.sh sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/system/linux/logrecord.sh sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/system/linux/messagelog.sh sblim-cmpi-syslog-test.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-testsuite/system/linux/msglogtest.sh 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 9 warnings. >BAD # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >BAD - CPL is marked as non GPL compatible # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >bad/ok - spec file has CPL but COPYING contains GPL text, files are CPL # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >BAD? - There is GPL text, which is not package license. And is not in docdir # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >BAD - not upstream source # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok in fedora11 x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >ok # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] >ok # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] >ok # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] >ok # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >BAD # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >BAD - has no devel rpm and should have # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] >ok # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >BAD # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >OK ---------------- Summary: Add shebangs to scripts' 1st line (/bin/sh) Move devel files to -devel subpackage Do not install binary files into /usr/share Check CPL license Why is GPL text in package? URL tag is not valid. Source tarball is not from upstream Add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to the start of %install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 13:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161317.n8GDHfUb014099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-09-16 09:17:40 EDT --- The "no-dependency-on ..." warning is due to missing functionality in the current version on rpmlint. Updating to the latest rpmlint currently available in testing the warning goes away: $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/globus-authz-callout-error-devel-0.4-1.fc11.i586.rpm globus-authz-callout-error-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (see bug #513811) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 13:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161337.n8GDb7fq018870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 13:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161359.n8GDxOAP023466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-16 09:59:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You must open (or create) a config file (eg. Fedora/s390x from > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/spins/S390/) and then use Command/Power on > from menu. Yes, I tried that but got the following error messages in the text area: HHCHD007E unable to open DLL dyngui: file not found HHCIN008S DYNGUI.DLL load failed; Hercules terminated. It's strange that hercules tries to load a dll while its expected to use dyngui.so from /usr/lib/hercules. I also get this error when calling hercules manually by $ hercules -d -f /tmp/hercules.cnf EXTERNALGUI Anyway, this seems to be a problem with the hercules package I used (hercules-3.06-3.fc11.i586 from updates-testing). The hercstudio package is set up properly so that we can finish the review here. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161406.n8GE6iWD006278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 10:06:43 EDT --- Maybe there are some hidden issues in Hercules directly, because the GUI available only on Windows until now. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523715] New: Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 Summary: Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: grue at diku.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpmspec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.2/download/logiweb-0.2.2-1.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpm.html Description: Logiweb allows to web publish 'Logiweb pages', i.e. journal quality articles which contain machine readable objects like programs, testsuites, definitions, axioms, lemmas, and proofs. Among other, Logiweb is suited for literate programming, for publication of machine verified proofs, and for writing proof checkers. Logiweb allows Logiweb pages to reference previously published Logiweb pages such that programs on a page may call programs on referenced pages, proofs on a page may reference lemmas on referenced pages, and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161427.n8GERkaE030573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #73 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-16 10:27:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #68) > Ok with a xcb patched cairo I then get to: > > -- Configuring awesome-version-internal.h > -- Configuring awesome.doxygen > -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > > (same with 3.3.4) No idea what it means, can you please try it in mock? (fedora-rawhide-i386 seems to work for me.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161432.n8GEWCDc032059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 Klaus Grue changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |grue at diku.dk Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502818] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161444.n8GEi1fL002301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502818 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-16 10:44:00 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-cmpi-dns]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-dns-* sblim-cmpi-dns.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libRaToolsDns.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 sblim-cmpi-dns.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/sblim-cmpi-dns/smt_dns_ra_lines.awk sblim-cmpi-dns-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-dns-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >BAD - CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok on fedora11 on x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >ok # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] >ok # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >BAD # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ----- Remark: Requires bug #502596 Summary: Why not make %{?_smp_mflags} ? Fix sblim-cmpi-dns.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libRaToolsDns.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Add shebang Check CPL license Add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %install section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161449.n8GEnDFa003649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-09-16 10:49:12 EDT --- D'oh! I saw 0775 and my brain translated it into 0755 before handing it to my logic unit. It's all my brain's fault. The logic unit worked fine. :-) I still don't understand, though, because that file has mode 0755 when I build it, which is why I'm not seeing the rpmlint warning. Perhaps umask has something to do with it. In any case, I have added an %attr line to the spec file to make sure the right permissions are set. I neglected to bump the release number, so I have committed the packaging faux pas of pushing new versions to exactly the same URLs as in comment 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161452.n8GEqonp018389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523715 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161452.n8GEqn4K018350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |505154(FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-16 10:52:47 EDT --- Just some comments after a quick look at your spec file: - You should a disttag to 'Release' -> Release: 1%{?dist} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Spec_file_pieces_explained - The license is GPLv2+. The source header says 'or (at your option) any later version.' - Source0 should point to the upstream location of the source tarball https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - About the Buildroot : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - Is there a reason why you don't use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make - You must use macros in the %file section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Macros - '%defattr(-,root,root)' should be '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' - Preserve the Timestamps when possible in the install section Please reread the Fedora Packaging Guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines) for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 14:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161455.n8GEta1W019580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #6 from Steve Milner 2009-09-16 10:55:35 EDT --- Making the changes and rebuilding now ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161501.n8GF1OfT007945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #24 from srinivas 2009-09-16 11:01:21 EDT --- Changes implemented and the files are placed under http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcb/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__?= =?utf-8?q?Firmware_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iwl1000-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 Summary: Review Request: iwl1000-firmware - Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl1000-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/iwl1000-firmware-128.50.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the firmware required by the iwlagn driver for Linux to support the iwl1000 hardware. Usage of the firmware is subject to the terms and conditions contained inside the provided LICENSE file. Please read it carefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161508.n8GF8dMj010052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |483098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161510.n8GFA6kR023515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #7 from Steve Milner 2009-09-16 11:10:05 EDT --- $ sha1sum ncrack-0.01-0.3.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm ncrack.spec 5c70bc79bb891904b0f4ebb27164afd92651e573 ncrack-0.01-0.3.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm 927ab719e67daddf67ddffb0ba8e28fb73c09a6f ncrack.spec Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-0.3.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161514.n8GFEmSK011706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161514.n8GFEkdN024691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-16 11:14:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable Short Description: A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161531.n8GFVkB6016375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #2 from Klaus Grue 2009-09-16 11:31:45 EDT --- By accident, I placed a template, not a spec file at http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpmspec Sorry. Now http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.2/download/rpmspec contains the real spec file. I will update according to #1 as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 15:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161553.n8GFrkr8002384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-16 11:53:42 EDT --- Review ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2) OK, text in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (9fbad0c03c21463c1529365764ab1e636b4a5c5aed95a7d3ed67b49cd39d7179) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Licensing Note: The source code does not contain any license attribution aside from one reference: fprintf (stderr, " Distributed under the GNU General Public License\n"); Technically, every source code file should have a comment header in which the license of the code is given, something like: /* Copyright (C) yyyy name of author This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. */ You should ask upstream to add this header to all of their source files (with a correct copyright date and author name). Technically, the code without these attributions is under "GPL+", because the GPL explicitly says that: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." However, we know from the website that the author's intent is for this code to be GPLv2 only, so it is fine to leave it tagged as such. By adding the copyright statement to his source files, he will also be specifying the version of the GPL he intends to use, and closing this ambiguity. ***** This package is approved, and I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502834] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161600.n8GG0kS2023677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502834 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-16 12:00:44 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-cmpi-samba]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-samba-* sblim-cmpi-samba.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/sblim-cmpi-samba/smt_smb_ra_test.py sblim-cmpi-samba-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-samba-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >BAD - CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok on fedora11 x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ---- Summary: Fix EOL in /usr/share/sblim-cmpi-samba/smt_smb_ra_test.py Check CPL license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161611.n8GGBx12006896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-16 12:11:58 EDT --- Dan, the devio manual page mentions section 8 while you put it into man1 (which is the right place, I think). Shouldn't the section number be adapted (i.e. replace .TH DEVIO 8 by .TH DEVIO 1 in devio.man)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161630.n8GGUfjT030293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Matthew Harmsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mharmsen at redhat.com Summary|New Package for Dogtag PKI: |New Package for Dogtag PKI: |pki-java-tools |pki-native-tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161640.n8GGeu7x013837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #33 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-16 12:40:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > FIX rpmlint > gnustep-base.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line > You can fix this with Emacs' "untabify" command Done. > FIX license field accurate > some files are actually GPLv3+, while others are still GPLv2+. This means > the aggregate is GPLv3+. Most LGPL files are v2+ but some (makefiles! should > these not be GNU public domain ?!) are LGPLv3+. Assuming that upstream > intention is to switch files to (L)GPLv3+ as they are updated, I think we > can say "LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+". If you could email upstream and get a > clarification, and put a comment with the URL to the upstream mail from a > mailing list archive, that would be great. > > The other alternative is to split out the v2 and v3 files, but that would be > crazy if the division is merely temporal, rather than functional (i.e. if > there is no distinct subpackage with a different license) You should not aggregate several Licenses to one which may compatible to the all of the others. > FIX spec legible > - the comment for renaming pl mentions pllit but the file is renamed to > pllist. Done. typo. > FIX build dependencies complete > gmp-devel listed twice > /usr/bin/iconv is bad for two reasons: > - we frown on file-based dependencies because they can be expensive to Done. > FIX own all directories > gnustep-base-devel should additionally requires gnustep-make: > - it is a development package, and is useless without the other makefiles > - it installs into %{_libdir}/GNUstep/Makefiles/Additional which is owned > by gnustep-make Done. > FIX require package not files > see above (iconv) Done. Next Release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/put/gnustep-base/gnustep-base-1.18.0-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502843] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161641.n8GGfPkk013916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-16 12:41:23 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 sblim-cmpi-fsvol]$ rpmlint * sblim-cmpi-fsvol.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: sblim-cmpi-fsvol-make.patch sblim-cmpi-fsvol.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: sblim-cmpi-fsvol-enum-coredump.patch sblim-cmpi-fsvol.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: sblim-cmpi-fsvol-make.patch sblim-cmpi-fsvol.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: sblim-cmpi-fsvol-enum-coredump.patch 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 x86_64]$ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-fsvol-* sblim-cmpi-fsvol-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-fsvol-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . > BAD - CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >BAD URL and SOURCE # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok on Fedora11 and x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >ok # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ----- Summary: Remove unused patches. Check CPL license Fix URL and SOURCE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] New: Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Summary: Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/python-mwclient/python-mwclient.spec SRPM URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/python-mwclient/python-mwclient.spec Build logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681623 Description: Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API and allows access to almost all implemented API functions rpmlint -i SRPMS/python-mwclient-0.6.3-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 16:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161656.n8GGuJiK003553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-09-16 12:56:18 EDT --- srpm here: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/python-mwclient/python-mwclient-0.6.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Steven M. Parrish - KDE Triage Master - PackageKit Triager Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161707.n8GH7q2v019703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-16 13:07:49 EDT --- Unfortunately, I have to recorgnise, that you didn't made your homework. I have the feeling, that you don't have the base skills to become a fedora packager. Because the package you want to provides is on the wishlist, I will close this review request and create an own one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161706.n8GH6JL3006152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161706.n8GH69TD006092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 13:06:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hercstudio Short Description: GUI for Hercules Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161724.n8GHO4LS022941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-09-16 13:24:02 EDT --- # rpmlint pki-ca-1.3.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm pki-ca.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/pki/ca/conf/CS.cfg 0660 pki-ca.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/pki/ca/logs/signedAudit 0770 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. EXPLANATION: (1) The 'CS.cfg' file requires a mode of '0660' due to security sensitive information potentially contained within this file; therefore, it must not be viewable by others, and since this package is part of a cross-platform product, it may not rely exclusively upon SELinux access control. (2) Similarly, the 'signedAudit' directory requires a mode of '0770' as this directory, when enabled, contains security sensitive logfiles that must not be viewable by others, and since this package is part of a cross-platform product, it may not rely exclusively upon SELinux access control. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523799] New: Review Request: ascii - nteractive ascii name and synonym chart Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ascii - nteractive ascii name and synonym chart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799 Summary: Review Request: ascii - nteractive ascii name and synonym chart Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ascii/ascii.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/ascii/ascii-3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The ascii utility provides easy conversion between various byte representations and the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) character table. It knows about a wide variety of hex, binary, octal, Teletype mnemonic, ISO/ECMA code point, slang names, XML entity names, and other representations. Given any one on the command line, it will try to display all others. Called with no arguments it displays a handy small ASCII chart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161731.n8GHVUW9012659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 13:31:29 EDT --- Looks like the man page section reflects the old location (sbin) of the binary, patch with a fix posted upstream. Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/devio.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/devio-1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161740.n8GHe771027027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-09-16 13:40:06 EDT --- # rpmlint pki-native-tools-1.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm pki-native-tools.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pki/templates/pki_subsystem_command_wrapper 0644 /bin/sh pki-native-tools.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/pki/templates/pki_instance_command_wrapper 0644 /bin/sh 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. EXPLANATION: (1) Both of these files are are non-executable "templates" which require substituted values to create executable command-line wrappers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:47:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161747.n8GHlb9A015959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-16 13:47:36 EDT --- Ugh, the date is wrong in the changelog entry... I guess I'll fix that when importing the package. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161746.n8GHkvp7015902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-16 13:46:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f12/kio_gopher.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f12/kio_gopher-0.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm * Tue Sep 15 2009 Kevin Kofler - 0.1.3-2 - drop postfix tag from Release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 17:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161753.n8GHrwdr017301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-16 13:53:57 EDT --- Reuploaded with the correct changelog date (Wed Sep 16 2009). ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 18:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161804.n8GI4jYR019896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-16 14:04:43 EDT --- Well, * ExclusiveArch - This package does not build on ppc/ppc64. This is because this package contains some codes which really won't work on ppc/ppc64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681058 This spec file needs: "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64". ! About Patch1 - I would rather install man file and binary file manually for this package, however I will leave it to you where you use patch this patch or not. * %attr(644,root,root) - I would suggest to change the permission explicitly at %install stage (if really needed) rather than using %attr for this issue like: --------------------------------------------------------- %install .... .... chmod 0644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/picprog.1* --------------------------------------------------------- Anyway this package is rather simple, so: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 18:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161813.n8GIDj15022178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-16 14:13:44 EDT --- Stjepan, would you update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 18:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161856.n8GIufYL012520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #3 from Stjepan Gros 2009-09-16 14:56:40 EDT --- Here are updated srpm and spec files based on the comment #1. Licence is changed, redundant build requires are removed, aamples are now in separate package, and finally, there is desktop file: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk-1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 19:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909161900.n8GJ0uD7013946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-16 15:00:55 EDT --- Licensing problem :-( * zikula-module-EZComments-0.1.61-1.fc11.src/modules/EZComments/pnjavascript/toggle.js This is taken from: http://www.dustindiaz.com//check_one_check_all_javascript.php All content on the blog is licensed http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ so without a note from the author, that's the license of the javascript. Creative Commons licenses are incompatible with any version of the GPL so we have a problem here. spot, are there any special rules for javascript being served by a web framework that would mitigate this? Or does the: The files are included in the same tarball and are used to form a whole program. rule mean this is not legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162002.n8GK2DQV027483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162002.n8GK2iDN018549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-16 16:02:43 EDT --- spot, relaying from Legal says that there are options but by far the simplest is to get the upstream author of the javascript to relicense to something GPL compatible. This could be GPLv2+ (since zikula is GPLv2+) or it could be MIT, new BSD, Public Domain, or any of the other GPL compatible licenses. This table has a column for GPLv2 and GPLv3 compatibility: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses To do this, someone has to talk to the author of the blog about relicensing the code. You could talk to him directly or go through the zikula/EZComment developers. In the interest of speed, it's probably going to come down to letting the zikula/EZComment guys know about the problem and then doing the footwork to contact the blog author about the relicense yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520621] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162015.n8GKFtVT021196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520621 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:15:54 EDT --- The spec needs a lot of fixing, therefore I added NotReady to the status whiteboard. Please remove it after you have addressed these issues: 1) The spec does not match the srpm, the spec is for version 1.51, but the srpm is for version 1.50 2) GPL is not a valid license tag, it might be GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, ... You can find more information about this here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL 3) Vendor and Packager should not be used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Tags 4) The Distribution tag should probably not be used, but I asked on fedora-packaging about this 5) The init script should not be started automatically in %post imho, because the user might first want to tweak laptop-mode before it is started 6) %{_usr}/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d must not be owned by laptop-mode-tools, it is owned by filesystem for Fedora Rawhide (F12) 7) The manpages in %files should hava an asterisk appended (*), because in the Fedora buildsystem, the manpages will be gzipped, so the pattern won't match. Also it is not needed to mark them as %doc, this is already done automatically 8) %{_usr}/sbin should be %{_sbindir} and %{_usr}/share %{_datadir}, also it is uncommon to use %{_usr} but to use %{_prefix} instead You also need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, because you do not have submitted any package to Fedora. Here is more information about the whole process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162032.n8GKWbvb001670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:32:32 EDT --- In contradiction to comment:8 and comment:7, there are these Requires in the spec: Requires(post): /usr/bin/update-mime-database, /usr/bin/update-desktop-database Requires(postun): /usr/bin/update-mime-database, /usr/bin/update-desktop-database Btw. where in the guidelines are inline .desktop and .xml files allowed? I agree with the others that this makes upstreaming unecessaryly harder. The patches do not have any upstream status attached: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment The changelog header for 0.2-9 is broken, it contains the Name twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162031.n8GKVHqH024802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 16:31:16 EDT --- rfkill-0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162033.n8GKXwis025727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 16:33:57 EDT --- ath_info-0-0.1.20090902svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162031.n8GKVM4H024840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520923] Review Request: ath_info - Tool to get detailed information from Atheros WLAN cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162034.n8GKY3QJ025780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520923 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.1.20090902svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162035.n8GKZD4D003107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 16:35:12 EDT --- gprof2dot-1.0-0.2.20090901svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gprof2dot'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162037.n8GKb6ev027552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #22 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:37:01 EDT --- There seem to be major issues to be resolved first, please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard once this package is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162038.n8GKcCxt027970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #39 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:38:06 EDT --- Please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard if you have sorted out who wants to submit this review and when the issues from comment:32 are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162037.n8GKbIZb027634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-09-16 16:37:15 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review. (In reply to comment #6) > Ping? There are some small changes that need to be made, otherwise the package > is OK. Sorry for the late response. I came just back from 2 weeks of vacation. ;-) The new packages can be found here: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp-0-0.4.20090828.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #5) > clutter-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig file for > clutter-sharp > clutter-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > > The first should probably be fixed. The default spec file has > > Development files for %{name} > > which could be used. Esp. since we're packaging more than just the .pc file! Fixed. > OK build dependencies complete (Koji) > > FAIL on the other hand, runtime dependencies are not complete > > rpm -q --requires clutter-sharp > > rpm -e clutter 2>out.txt > cat out.txt | grep sharp > > shows that the dependency on clutter is not picked up; this should be > added manually. Fixed. > Also, once clutter-gtk can be enabled (prod the maintainer for an update?) Unfortunately clutter-gtk is not yet released yet: http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/clutter-gtk/0.10/ . I'll try to keep this in mind and create a bug entry for clutter-gtk once 0.10.3 is released. > you'd want to Requires: clutter-gtk, and meanwhile, now you want to > %exclude %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/clutter-gtk-sharp.pc Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162041.n8GKfMGB029389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #21 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:41:20 EDT --- The upstream status of the patches is missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162049.n8GKnGgE008737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 16:49:15 EDT --- Instead of %define, %global should be used in the spec. The upstream tarball seems to bundle python-simplejson, which you install in %install. This is wrong. There is also a Requires: on python-simplejson, so something is wrong. Also copying the c source of _speedups.so is just wrong. Please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard if these issues are resolved. If you have any questions, please ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 20:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162050.n8GKoJJ2009316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-16 16:50:16 EDT --- Here's my review of this small package. I didn't find any further issues to be fixed, but maybe you can add the following text from the devio website to the description in order to make its purpose a bit clearer: The primary difference between devio and other command line utilities, such as dd and cat, is that it is not stream based - it writes directly into the object rather than reading and writing a stream of data. The wrong section number in devio.man is not a blocker. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/devio-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - according to COPYING and boilerplate: MIT (modern style with sublicense) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: License file must be included in %doc. - COPYING added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: Packaged tarball must match the upstream source. md5 hash: 5d332c2bffc0791367bcf3368ba1a0d1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - koji scratch build is successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1684182 [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - no explicit build dependencies necessary [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [.] MUST: Packages with shared libraries must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... - not relocatable [.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - doesn't create directories [+] MUST: Files must not listed more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files packaged [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no pkgconfig files [.] MUST: .so files must go in a -devel package. - no .so files [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency - no devel package [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files created during build [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets required [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - no subpackages ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162100.n8GL0lrG013012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 17:00:45 EDT --- I was thinking about adding the same sentence to the description :-) Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162101.n8GL1fJh013174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-16 17:01:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: devio Short Description: Read and write utility for block devices Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162108.n8GL8iDT006217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 17:08:44 EDT --- This %{_mandir}/man1/ncrack.1.gz should be %{_mandir}/man1/ncrack.1* because the compression of the manpage depends on the rpm configuration. %description contains an extra space as the last character of the last line, this is not needed. Feel free to update this just when some other issues are discovered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162110.n8GLAx0p007109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 17:10:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > please do not start a review. this package need some more love. > i will do this... Please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard once it is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162117.n8GLHm1S018546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #11 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 17:17:45 EDT --- Nicolas, if you want to review this package, please set fedora-review to ? or reassing to the default owner of the component, if you do not want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162117.n8GLHnK6009219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:17:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162116.n8GLGbIj008887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:16:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162119.n8GLJw1U009695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 17:19:56 EDT --- Please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard if the package is ready for review. Also please post error messages in the feature with an added "LANG=C" before the command to make the error message appear in English. This will allow more people to easier help you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162118.n8GLIviJ018842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:18:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162120.n8GLKPJY019626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:20:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162119.n8GLJp2l019088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:19:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162124.n8GLOouD021142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:24:46 EDT --- You do not own that package in Fedora, and I see no indication that the existing Fedora owner wishes to have their packages branched for EPEL. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL, get an ack from the current owner of the Fedora package, adjust the Owners: field if necessary and re-set the CVS flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162130.n8GLUBjr014582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:30:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162129.n8GLT6jZ013600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-16 17:29:02 EDT --- Here's a preliminary review; there are some things to be fixed, packaging-wise, and a build failure. The failures occur on x86_64, whereas you've only tested ix86, but whether ix86 is fine on the server or x86_64 just happened to fail first, you'd have to verify. I'll try building locally on my x86_64 box and see what's going on. MUST ? rpmlint $ rpmlint frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. binary not checked yet; builds fail OK package name - matches source tarball OK spec file name - matches package name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines OK license field accurate note: do you have to disable mod_lpsolver? Just make it a subpackage, and license *that* subpackage under the GPL. You'd then want to bundle the GPLv2 COPYING file in the tarball, and rename the LGPL license file to COPYING.LIB OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English FIX spec legible - source tarball listed twice, and Source1 is never used. It's fine to specify a remote URL, as rpmbuild will just strip the remote part of the URL anyway. Using a remote URL is so that, given the spec, someone can use spectool -gf to retrieve the tarball from upstream. - in %build, pass %{?_smp_mflags} to make if possible, for build parallelism - don't hardcode .gz extension for manpage, use * instead OK source matches upstream $ md5sum frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz 52c03862345f6247bfda5f7e848457f3 frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz 52c03862345f6247bfda5f7e848457f3 ../SOURCES/frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz FIX builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded xml_remote test fails: F-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1684341 F-12 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1684245 OK build dependencies complete OK library -> ldconfig FIX own all directories going overboard by owning %{python_sitelib} ! Don't own files already owned by Python or Django OK no dupes in %files FIX permission use %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code FIX large docs => -doc ? doc not runtime dependent Rule of thumb is, if it has PDFs and/or more than a couple of HTML files, put them in a separate subpackage OK headers in -devel OK if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel OK devel requires versioned base package OK clean buildroot before install ? filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it include GPLv2 license text when packaging the currently disabled module FIX package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described ? other subpackages should require versioned base do this for -doc OK require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162131.n8GLVqBC015570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:31:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162142.n8GLg46U029202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:42:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162139.n8GLdXli027916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:39:32 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162143.n8GLhlaR029767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:43:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162141.n8GLfX0o028985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthew Truch 2009-09-16 17:41:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: getdata New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: mtruch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162142.n8GLguXe020525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-16 17:42:55 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162144.n8GLilPK020967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:44:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162145.n8GLjqrq030700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #5 from David Huff 2009-09-16 17:45:51 EDT --- I have rebuilt the rpms with prober dist tag as well as insured the links are correct.... http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-1.0.2-0.fc12.src.rpm http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514311] Review Request: ovirt-node-recipe - oVirt Node image recipe and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162148.n8GLmgpP031469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514311 --- Comment #1 from David Huff 2009-09-16 17:48:41 EDT --- I have rebuilt the srpm with prober dist tag as well as insured the links are correct.... http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-recipe.spec http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-recipe-1.0.2-0.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162145.n8GLjYiW030604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:45:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162147.n8GLlqeA031180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-16 17:47:50 EDT --- On my machine, I get *more* errors, but xml_remote actually passed (so that problem might be a missing Build Requirement). As long as it passes unit tests on the build servers, it does not matter so much if it fails on individual machines, though that's still odd and we should try fixing it. http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/4893556/The_Big_Bang_Theory_Season_2_Complete.4893556.TPB.torrent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162147.n8GLlfwG022047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:47:39 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162148.n8GLmjal022418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 17:48:44 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162150.n8GLoMKQ023143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 --- Comment #15 from Jim Radford 2009-09-16 17:50:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > In contradiction to comment:8 and comment:7, there are these Requires in the > spec: Requires(post): /usr/bin/update-mime-database, Fixed. > Btw. where in the guidelines are inline .desktop and .xml files allowed? I don't recall, but the policy was changed recently (I recall it being mentioned in a FWN), and so as I prefer them in the spec, I moved them back. > The patches do not have any upstream status attached: I've sent all the patches upstream. Some have been acked, some have had further discussion, but I have yet to see an update. > The changelog header for 0.2-9 is broken, it contains the Name twice. Damn rpm-spec-mode! Fixed. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/clamz-0.2-10.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 21:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162152.n8GLq7GI023854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 --- Comment #14 from Mark Hamzy 2009-09-16 17:52:06 EDT --- I am fine with EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162210.n8GMAVRI030627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 18:10:30 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162210.n8GMAXjw030658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 18:10:32 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162210.n8GMAdVt007862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 18:10:37 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162210.n8GMATUT007794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 18:10:28 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162209.n8GM9AEF007054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Bug 498194 depends on bug 521352, which changed state. Bug 521352 Summary: Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162209.n8GM98VK006988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-09-16 18:09:06 EDT --- Package: libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Built by: robert Package: libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: libvmime07-0.7.1-1.el4 Tag: dist-4E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167943] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162214.n8GMEfZ8008929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167943 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-16 18:14:40 EDT --- You're not the current package owner in Fedora as far as I can tell. Nor are you the co-maintainer, nor are you even CC'd on commits. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/sblim-cmpi-base -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162217.n8GMH8Pa000582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-16 18:17:06 EDT --- You're supposed to set fedora-review+, not fedora-cvs+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 22:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516802] Review Request: cryptcat - Standard netcat enhanced with twofish encryption capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162259.n8GMxwKs016123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516802 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 18:59:57 EDT --- please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard once this review requests needs attention by a reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162301.n8GN1uvR025778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:01:52 EDT --- Please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard once this review requests needs attention by a reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162305.n8GN5qDv018386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 19:05:49 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162306.n8GN60Nv027323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 19:05:59 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162320.n8GNKK6m023382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #17 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:20:16 EDT --- - The .la issue is still unsolved I asked on fedora-packaging about this - The patches are missing an explanation of their upstream status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Please remove the NotReady from the status Whiteboard once these issues are addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162330.n8GNUNeN026677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:30:22 EDT --- - The URL is outdated, the new one is: http://sourceware.org/automake/ - The installation of the manpages is missing -p to preserve the timestamp - Why are the manpages not submitted to upstream? Please remove the NotReady from the status Whiteboard once it is clear which part of automake is MIT licensed (see comment:7). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162333.n8GNXkHd027684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #15 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-09-16 19:33:44 EDT --- Link to my review request is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491815 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162333.n8GNXFMg027495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rayvd at bludgeon.org --- Comment #14 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-09-16 19:33:11 EDT --- Oops, I somehow missed this when I opened the review request for bz #491815. Looks like this hasn't been touched in several months however. Rene, are you still interested in moving forward with maintaining this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162336.n8GNaWHx005191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #12 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:36:29 EDT --- Please explain why the patch from comment:8 cannot be used or apply it. Also the patches need an explanation wrt. their upstream status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Please remove NotReady from the whiteboard, once this is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162342.n8GNgYEo031000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #37 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:42:28 EDT --- Please address all other issues mentioned here. Also I noted the following: - Source is not a valid URL - Source should iirc be Source0 instead - The patches do not have any upstream status comments: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard, once all known issues are addressed and action from a reviewer is needed again. Btw. there is also a new release available, maybe this allows to remove some patches. It is also already possible to branch for F12, so that the spec in devel can be fixed for F13, in case this is somehow necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225636] Merge Review: cairo-java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162347.n8GNlQk4000436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225636 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:47:25 EDT --- The patch needs a comment wrt. to the upstream status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162352.n8GNqrcj010522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #18 from Bojan Smojver 2009-09-16 19:52:51 EDT --- The answer to the .la question is that apr-1-config script has an option --link-libtool, which returns the .la file. If the .la file is not shipped, software that uses this option will fail to build. Ditto for apr-util. Upstream project defines "source compatibility" here: http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html#source If .la file is removed, we'll be breaking that versioning rule set by upstream, because some application will fail to build against such apr/apr-util package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 16 23:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufrequtils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909162354.n8GNsYBe011093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |opensource at till.name Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 19:54:32 EDT --- - The patches need comments wrt their upstream status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment - You need to either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/$RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{buildroot}/%{optflags}, but currently both styles are used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS I'll try to perform a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170005.n8H05TnK006742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #19 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 20:05:28 EDT --- Another unresolved issue, there is a static library included: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries So afaics either it must be removed or fesco needs to approve it. And yet another issue: There is still a Conflicts: for the -devel subpakage: Conflicts: subversion-devel < 0.20.1-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170008.n8H08Fwk015646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #20 from Till Maas 2009-09-16 20:08:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Another unresolved issue, there is a static library included: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries > > So afaics either it must be removed or fesco needs to approve it. I might be wrong here, but then the spec is kind of obfuscated: %files contains this: %{_libdir}/libapr-%{aprver}.*a But there is also this in %install: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/apr.exp \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libapr-*.a Therefore I guess the entry in %files can be changed to: %{_libdir}/libapr-%{aprver}.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170017.n8H0H52W018407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 --- Comment #21 from Bojan Smojver 2009-09-16 20:17:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Another unresolved issue, there is a static library included: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries > > So afaics either it must be removed or fesco needs to approve it. There is no static libraries in apr or apr-util, as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170033.n8H0XXrg022756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #19 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-16 20:33:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quotatool Short Description: summary of package Owners: Xia Shing Zee Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: xiashing, spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523877] New: Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Summary: Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CBFlib (Crystallographic Binary File library) is a library of ANSI-C functions providing a simple mechanism for accessing Crystallographic Binary Files (CBF files) and Image-supporting CIF (imgCIF) files. The CBFlib API is loosely based on the CIFPARSE API for mmCIF files. Like CIFPARSE, CBFlib does not perform any semantic integrity checks; rather it simply provides functions to create, read, modify and write CBF binary data files and imgCIF ASCII data files. also see: http://www.bernstein-plus-sons.com/software/CBF/ note: there isn't any autotools support for this package at the moment, I'm working on some patches for upstream to accomplish this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170041.n8H0fegv024862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-16 20:41:39 EDT --- Xia, you need to do a few things here. 1. You need to use your username in the "Owners" field, not your real name. :) 2. You don't need to specify F-12, that is "devel", and you always get that branch. 3. You didn't put the summary of the package, you put "summary of package". 4. You didn't change the fedora-cvs flag to ?, so no one will see this request. Try again? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170048.n8H0maPV026264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-16 20:48:35 EDT --- Pls use %global instead of %define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170053.n8H0rjiu018404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #21 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-16 20:53:44 EDT --- I just realized all of that, and got a mid-air collision when I tried to change the fedora-cvs flag ;) This should do it: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quotatool Short Description: quotatool is a utility to set filesystem quotas from the commandline. It is suitable for use in scripts and other non-interactive situations. Owners: xiashing Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: xiashing, spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 00:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170053.n8H0ruul027412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Xia Shing Zee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 01:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170142.n8H1gqLf028010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #74 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 21:42:49 EDT --- You're right mock is fine and awesome3 is more awesome! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170204.n8H24XVB031880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #4 from Stewart Adam 2009-09-16 22:04:33 EDT --- Updated to build to SVN r2559, which includes the changes made in 0.11rc4: SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec SRPM: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.1.rc4.20090916svn.src.rpm This SRPM also fixes the issue of .svn directories being included as %doc files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170229.n8H2Teue005403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 22:29:39 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-email-address-validation'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170231.n8H2VP3Z014988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 22:31:21 EDT --- perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170231.n8H2VvxQ015129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.1-3.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170231.n8H2VrbD006309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-16 22:31:51 EDT --- python-markdown-2.0.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170231.n8H2VUYk006219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.30-4.fc8 |0.30-6.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170254.n8H2sFOB011434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #7 from Ade Lee 2009-09-16 22:54:13 EDT --- Note on Warnings above: The pre, post, preun and postun scripts have been carefully checked to confirm that the correct file is copied and removed. In fact, the file that is created in %pre is deleted in %post, and the file that is created in %preun is deleted in %postun. These scripts are in fact identical to scripts already accepted in Fedora for the IPA spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] New: Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Summary: Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A set of blessed Haskell libraries and tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170305.n8H3501L013142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |523883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170304.n8H34xfl013122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170313.n8H3Dc6a023548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |523883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170313.n8H3Db6H023532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] New: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-network/ghc-network.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-network/ghc-network-2.2.1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Haskell network library Networking-related facilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170316.n8H3GfvT015357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:16:40 EDT --- One small problem that needs addressing that that ghc-network-doc comflicts with ghc-doc currently since doc dirs are not versioned for the sake of haddock. Possible workarounds: 1) version docs here (simplest but will hide the html?) 2) version the docs in ghc (needs a ghc rebuild:() 3) drop the docs from ghc-doc (ditto) (The same will apply for ghc-time, which is yet to be submitted.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170319.n8H3JLEu015580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170318.n8H3Irkt024457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:18:52 EDT --- With this users can just "yum install haskell-platform" and have a fully functional haskell devel env. Not sure if this will qualify fedora as the first distro to fully support haskell-platform officially? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170325.n8H3PJog025732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170325.n8H3PIf0025712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Blocks| |523883 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:25:18 EDT --- This package is also part of haskell-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] New: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time-1.1.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Haskell time library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170331.n8H3VYEk026738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-16 23:31:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170331.n8H3VbRd026766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-16 23:31:36 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 04:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170448.n8H4mb9C030732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #6 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-17 00:48:36 EDT --- > * ExclusiveArch > - This package does not build on ppc/ppc64. This is because > this package contains some codes which really won't work > on ppc/ppc64. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681058 > > This spec file needs: "ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64". Done. Looks like it *might* be possible to patch picprog to build on the ppc and ppc64, but I'll leave it for now. > ! About Patch1 > - I would rather install man file and binary file manually > for this package, however I will leave it to you where you > use patch this patch or not. Changed it to manual install using `install`. This removes the need for the chmod you mentioned. As for sponsorship... I have a few other packages I'd like to work on such as an assembler for Atmel AVR chips (as well as some packages for the RPM Fusion repos). I'll post the bug number here when I submit that package for review. Also, if I see any package review requests I'll have a look and see if I can help. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 04:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170451.n8H4pMPU008350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 00:51:21 EDT --- Ok. Unfortunately I have to close this bug as unable to find/verify upstream source. Thanks for your submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 04:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522482] Review Request: hunspell-om - Oromo hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170451.n8H4pWJS008390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522482 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 05:12:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170512.n8H5CEoM002631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #25 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-17 01:12:10 EDT --- Almost there. Final touch-ups: 1) All the init scripts have to be in added to /etc/rc.d/init.d. Currently they are added to /etc/init.d directory. Moving the sblim-sfcb script to the /etc/rc/init.d after "make install" should take care of this. 2) I verified that the devel package doesn't contain any header files. The make doesn't install any header files at all. So I don't see a reason to even build a devel package. Sorry for the confusion related to the same. Currently there seem to be no value in building a devel package for sblim-sfcb. So, please related lines from spec file After fixing the above, sblim-sfcb is good for CVS access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 05:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170527.n8H5Rt1o005232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 01:27:55 EDT --- It's just not my week. Sorry about that. I can't see anywhere in the source or the upstream web site that indicates which version of the GPL applies. DESCRIPTION and the upstream web site just say "GPL". The source code has no license information at all. According to the GPL, this means we can choose any version, so "License: GPL+" is the proper thing to use, unless you can get clarification from upstream (which you should try to do). I don't think a dependency on "R >= R-2.8" does anything useful. A proper versioned dependency would be "R >= 2.8". No supported Fedora version shipped with anything older than 2.8, but I'm not sure what might have been in some ancient version of EPEL so I suppose a versioned dependency could be necessary. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: dfd2ef9e23e201f2f7e4073c57701092e7b6d25960c38802d6f0527b20765898 plyr_0.1.9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. ? final provides and requires are sane: R-plyr = 0.1.9-2.fc12 = /bin/sh R ? R >= R-2.8 R-RUnit R-abind R-tcltk * %check is necessarily disabled. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R module registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 05:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170551.n8H5pqBX018857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 01:51:50 EDT --- any reason for not building this package yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 05:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170551.n8H5p3XO009200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 01:51:02 EDT --- Can you build that package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 06:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170623.n8H6NTSa014563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #8 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-17 02:23:28 EDT --- I'll fix the package errors over the weekend. Here are some quick comments: * The unit test xml_remote uses the Python standard library to pick up a data file from the frepple website. On machines without internet connection this test will fail. It is probably safer to skip the test - it is not a critical unit test for the package anyway. * The module mod_lpsolver is currently at an experimental stage only. I'ld prefer to keep it disabled for now. Once it is ready, I agree that it should be packaged as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 06:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170654.n8H6sxk9030457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-09-17 02:54:58 EDT --- There is build for 0.2 beta svn snapshot in this repo: ftp://volkoff.ru/repo/fedora11/ Here is discussion: http://linuxforum.ru/index.php?showtopic=99429 But perhaps they build it with bundled gloox. Is that bug still unfixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 07:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170701.n8H71lJf032613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 07:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170702.n8H72WR4024123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #22 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-09-17 03:02:30 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 07:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170713.n8H7DFw2007063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-17 03:13:13 EDT --- Uhm, and the short description should be the same as the summary in the spec file, i.e. "A utility to set filesystem quotas". Anyway, once you've imported the package the short description should be automatically updated from the spec file summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 07:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170745.n8H7jY7A001082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandpro | |mpt.com) --- Comment #19 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-17 03:45:29 EDT --- 3.0.1 has been release on August 21, 2009 Do you want to continue with review or I can close this BZ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170800.n8H803NW018323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 04:00:02 EDT --- ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170829.n8H8Tdc1026009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-17 04:29:36 EDT --- Everything seems good now. Sorry for the delay! ----------------------------------------- This package (rekonq) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170831.n8H8Vg3M011824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-17 04:31:39 EDT --- Closing, the package is imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170842.n8H8gCbp014054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 04:42:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1681981 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5255d1014e32556aa38ecb4a6382b0cec1e9f439 Try-Tiny-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=21, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Try-Tiny-0.02-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Try::Tiny) = 0.02 Requires: perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170850.n8H8orpe030735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Xia Shing Zee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 04:50:51 EDT --- New changes to the .spec file so that it builds successfully on ppc64 with koji: SPEC: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/quotatool.spec SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170852.n8H8qC0p016153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #25 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 04:52:11 EDT --- Short description updated as well as suggested New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quotatool Short Description: A utility to set filesystem quotas. Owners: xiashing Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: xiashing, spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170854.n8H8s8F6016361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 04:54:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1684904 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b9d189ef4bcf0046aaa6eb0ecd056cb37c120eba Text-FormatTable-1.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 ok 5 + Package perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Text::FormatTable) = 1.03 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170917.n8H9HOtd022396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #26 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 05:17:23 EDT --- Additional changes that should have been in the last release: SPEC: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/quotatool.spec SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/quotatool-1.4.10-7.fc11.src.rpm And the Updated CVS Request: Update Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quotatool Short Description: A utility to set filesystem quotas. Owners: xiashing Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: xiashing, spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170925.n8H9PMks006306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #37 from Till Maas 2009-09-17 05:25:17 EDT --- The release needs to include some date, e.g. of the time you created the snapshot or ideally of the time the revision was commited: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages You can add the revision after the svn string in the release, if you want: 0.2.20090917svn2431 The patch does not have an comment wrt the upstream status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment You should probably run desktop-file-validate: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files The snippets to update the icon cache are missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Btw. there is the string NotReady in the status whiteboard, which should be removed once this package needs some reviewer action, ie if above issues are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170940.n8H9esfI027186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #27 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-17 05:40:51 EDT --- After the creation of CVS module you are doing all updates on your own, without new CVS requests in bugzilla, please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:54:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170954.n8H9s2DE030432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #22 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-17 05:54:01 EDT --- Thanks for the heads up. Fixed and updated to newest snapshot. http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.17.r6858.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170959.n8H9xI6a031888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-17 05:59:17 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 x86_64]$ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-nfsv3-* sblim-cmpi-nfsv3.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so sblim-cmpi-nfsv3.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 sblim-cmpi-nfsv3-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >BAD - CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >BAD - bad URL and bad SOURCE # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok in Fedora11 on x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >BAD - no -devel package # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok -------- Summary: Move libraries to -devel package Fix exit call in library Check CPL license Fix URL and SOURCE tags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 09:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170959.n8H9x4WX013707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-17 05:59:03 EDT --- Thanks, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-FormatTable Short Description: Format text table Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171011.n8HABq23016482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-09-17 06:11:50 EDT --- Fixed. New spec and SRPM can be found at the original links -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171017.n8HAH3cR017669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 06:17:02 EDT --- quotatool-1.4.10-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quotatool-1.4.10-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171018.n8HAItY8017959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #29 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 06:18:55 EDT --- Dan, thanks for that, I temporarily forgot that once a CVS module is created, the owner can update it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171019.n8HAJGgU018085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Xia Shing Zee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171021.n8HALHLg005035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 06:21:16 EDT --- quotatool-1.4.10-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quotatool-1.4.10-7.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171031.n8HAVGDo007043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-17 06:31:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > You're supposed to set fedora-review+, not fedora-cvs+. Ah, thanks, my mistake... I was setting fedora-cvs+ on another review and you, sometimes you do thinks automaticaly ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171040.n8HAe8c1009045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-09-17 06:40:01 EDT --- Thank you very much Orcan. Getting this package reviewed has been quite a good learning process for me. I don't think I'll ever miss out on those pesky little details again. :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rekonq Short Description: KDE browser based on QtWebkit Owners: kaboon Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: kaboon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 10:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171055.n8HAtXfq026426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-17 06:55:32 EDT --- Added FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Please post hyperlinks to the spec file and the SRPM generated from it instead of posting attachments to the review bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171106.n8HB6oBY028824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 07:06:48 EDT --- any more unofficial reviews you done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503482] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171107.n8HB7PGb028896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503482 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-17 07:07:24 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 x86_64]$ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-nfsv4-* sblim-cmpi-nfsv4.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libLinux_NFSv4SystemConfigurationUtil.so libLinux_NFSv4SystemConfigurationUtil.so sblim-cmpi-nfsv4.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libLinux_NFSv4SystemConfigurationUtil.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 sblim-cmpi-nfsv4-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >BAD - CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >BAD - bad URL, bad SOURCE # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok in Fedora11 on x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] >BAD - no -debug package # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] >ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ------- Summary: Make -debug package Fix exit call in library Check CPL license Fix URL and SOURCE tags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171114.n8HBEKRV015772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #16 from Arun SAG 2009-09-17 07:14:19 EDT --- No, But i started packaging emacs-goodies http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec Will do more reviews in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171147.n8HBljwp006187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-17 07:47:43 EDT --- I should really set up some sort of notification for eclipse packages proposed for review :) I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171151.n8HBpd9Q007420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-17 07:51:37 EDT --- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/ncrack-* ncrack-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The debuginfo package is empty because the debugging information is stripped too early. To fix this issue, add sed -i '/\$(STRIP)/d' Makefile.in to the %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171156.n8HBuW0e008851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2009-09-17 07:56:31 EDT --- This is where those CMPI packaging guidelines would really help. In particular, all these CMPI plugins belong not in %{_libdir} but in %{_libdir}/cmpi/ where they can't interfere with the rest of the system's library search path. This is a problem in several of the CMPI packages being reviewed this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171158.n8HBwSJV026268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colin.coe at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Colin Coe 2009-09-17 07:58:27 EDT --- Hi Could you please post the spec file and SRPM to a web or ftp server where they can be downloaded. I'll have a look at the package once this is done. Thanks CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171202.n8HC2un8010368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-17 08:02:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kio_gopher Short Description: Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror Owners: kkofler jreznik rdieter ltinkl than svahl Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: tuxbrewr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521639] Review Request: hercstudio - GUI for Hercules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171231.n8HCVws8017999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521639 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-17 08:31:57 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520570] Review Request: devio - Read and write utility for block devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171231.n8HCVVSf002785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520570 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-17 08:31:30 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:50:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] New: Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Summary: Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ldapvi.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ldapvi-1.8-0.1.git20090917.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: ldapvi is an interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals. Using it, you can update LDAP entries with a text editor. Think of it as vipw(1) for LDAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171251.n8HCpvlk007735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |511746 --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-17 08:51:56 EDT --- The package has been orphaned and FTBFS (see the blocked bug). Now trying to revive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171256.n8HCu3n3008982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523972 Bug 520479 depends on bug 517763, which changed state. Bug 517763 Summary: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 12:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496697] Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171256.n8HCubfS009358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496697 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colin.coe at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Colin Coe 2009-09-17 08:56:36 EDT --- Have had a quick look at this... Looks like you're distributing a binary distribution when the source is available. Could you repackage using the source so that it can be built correctly for Fedora? Also: - You have the URL as 'http://www.ikvm.net' when it should really be the full URL to the source tarball or zip file. Something like 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ikvm/ikvm-0.40.0.1.zip'. - Please run 'rpmlint' on the SPEC and SRPM files and correct any errors found - You need to use macros instead of things like '${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/ikvm'. i.e. ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/ikvm. (On a Fedora or RHEL box, have a look at /usr/lib/rpm/macros) - The use of here documents is discouraged, please include the file as SOURCE1. - The changelog is empty. For the first package release, it should be something like: * Wed Feb 11 2009 Mauricio Henriquez (buhochileno at gmail.com) - 0.38.0.4-3.2 Initial Packaging I'll review again when the above is addressed. Thanks CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 13:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171301.n8HD1qEV026040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 09:01:51 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 13:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171301.n8HD1jXs010586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 09:01:44 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 13:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171301.n8HD1vA9010626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 09:01:56 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RackTables-0.17.4-7.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 13:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171332.n8HDWU3U032644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-17 09:32:28 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 x86_64]$ rpmlint sblim-cim-client-* sblim-cim-client.x86_64: E: no-binary sblim-cim-client.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/java/sblim-slp-client.properties sblim-cim-client.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/java/sblim-cim-client.properties sblim-cim-client-javadoc.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPFindAttributes.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/wbem/cimclient/sample/InvokeMethodSample.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPRegistration.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPFindServices.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/wbem/cimclient/sample/IndicationSubscriptionListenerSample.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/wbem/cimclient/sample/IntrospectionSample.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPDeregistration.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPFindServiceTypes.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/slpMain.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/wbem/cimclient/sample/SimpleTestClient.java sblim-cim-client-manual.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3/org/sblim/slp/example/SLPClient.java 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >CPL # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >BAD - bad URL and SOURCE # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok in Fedora11 on x86_64 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >BAD # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] >ok # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >BAD - file /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3 is not owned by any package # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] >ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] >ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ----- Summary: According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java, there is missing BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] and Requires: java >= specific_version Does not contain binaries -> should be noarch Mark config files as noreplace Correct EOL in files (funny, javadoc has no documentation :) ) Check CPL license Fix URL and SOURCE tags All packages having files in /usr/share/doc/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3 should own it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 13:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171354.n8HDsFce023555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 14:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171425.n8HEPO0Q000535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Rob Crittenden changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rcritten at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Rob Crittenden 2009-09-17 10:25:23 EDT --- I think a more robust description of where Source0 comes from is needed per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 14:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171426.n8HEQ1Se014380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(e at arix.com) --- Comment #7 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-17 10:26:00 EDT --- > Source0: http://www.outoforder.cc/downloads/mod_gnutls/mod_gnutls-0.5.5.tar.bz2 I'd suggest using %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 here. There is missing 'Requires: httpd%{?_isa}' otherwise the package could be installed into unowned directories and it also obviously would not be working without httpd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 14:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524006] New: Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 Summary: Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: XiaShing at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/cpulimit.spec SRPM URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/cpulimit-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: cpulimit is a simple program that attempts to limit the cpu usage of a process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 14:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171459.n8HExAhP022143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 Xia Shing Zee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171507.n8HF73W7010854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 --- Comment #1 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 11:07:03 EDT --- I think I forgot to fix the date on the changelog. Does it matter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171508.n8HF8vaZ024088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-17 11:08:56 EDT --- Spec file changes: sed trickery removed. desktop-file-validate less verbose. Version corrected. Changed to %{_kde4_iconsdir} and %{_kde4_appsdir} New spec and SRPM uploaded: Spec Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge.spec SRPM Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/skrooge-0.5.1-0.3.beta.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/skrooge-0.5.1-0.3.beta.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint skrooge.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/skrooge*-0.5.1-0.3.beta.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1686251 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171517.n8HFHXCE013380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171517.n8HFHV32013353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-17 11:17:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Try-Tiny Short Description: Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171520.n8HFKDbn027469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-17 11:20:10 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171525.n8HFPgIp015561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-17 11:25:41 EDT --- You seem to have accidentally set the fedora-review flag to +, which would mean you to approve your own package. Resetting fedora-review flag to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 15:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496697] Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171551.n8HFp9SR021939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496697 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-09-17 11:51:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Have had a quick look at this... Looks like you're distributing a binary > distribution when the source is available. Could you repackage using the > source so that it can be built correctly for Fedora? > > Also: > - You have the URL as 'http://www.ikvm.net' when it should really be the full > URL to the source tarball or zip file. Something like > 'http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ikvm/ikvm-0.40.0.1.zip'. Note, URL: should remain http://www.ikvm.net Source0: should be changed to something like http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ikvm/ikvm-0.40.0.1.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 16:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171636.n8HGauoh012565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 12:36:55 EDT --- mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 16:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171636.n8HGapBw032153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 12:36:50 EDT --- mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171712.n8HHCwOn008759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-17 13:12:57 EDT --- I'll sponsor Thomas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171731.n8HHVIIY026284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171730.n8HHUlBm026193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 13:30:45 EDT --- The submitter hasn't responded to any review of any of his tickets; I'm closing them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171729.n8HHTFl3025615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(callea.gaetano.an | |drea at gmail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 13:29:13 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171731.n8HHVVoZ013515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503301] Review Request: vim-nerdtree - Tree File Browser for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171731.n8HHV4SI013243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503301 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 13:31:03 EDT --- The submitter hasn't responded to any review of any of his tickets; I'm closing them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171739.n8HHdbOW014958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kdas at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2009-09-17 13:39:36 EDT --- You are supposed to bump the revision -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171739.n8HHd7AB028050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #38 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-17 13:39:04 EDT --- the date guideline seems somewhat absurd as SVN revision is _more_ precise than date, but who am I to argue with guidelines. =) will fix those up soon. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 17:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171750.n8HHoxxu032234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-17 13:50:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: skrooge Short Description: Skrooge is a personal finances manager, aiming at being simple and intuitive. Owners: thomasj Branches: F-10, F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI18sR002225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 14:01:07 EDT --- perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI1Dwd002264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.02-1.fc11 |1.02-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171802.n8HI2VMF002493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 14:02:30 EDT --- eqntott-9.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI1Wv0022521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 14:01:30 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171802.n8HI2agl022860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|9.0-2.fc10 |9.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI1b2p022562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.5-5.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI1LFj022443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 14:01:20 EDT --- quotatool-1.4.10-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update quotatool'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171801.n8HI1Qbi022495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 14:01:25 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update RackTables'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171805.n8HI5tF1004073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #30 from Bastien Nocera 2009-09-17 14:05:52 EDT --- FYI, you might want to integrate this patch as well: http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6226 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171805.n8HI5mfc004006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |XiaShing at gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-17 14:05:46 EDT --- *** Bug 524006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171805.n8HI5lsN003964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-17 14:05:46 EDT --- There is already an open review request for cpulimit. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 513541 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171804.n8HI4d92003218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-17 14:04:38 EDT --- Okay , formal review time: + rpmlint warning explained above. + Package follows globus guidelines. + Apache 2 license. + license file included. + SPEC file readable. + Builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1686863 ... All else good. APPROVED. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171809.n8HI9wkw025014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-17 14:09:56 EDT --- (2) is explained by bug #513811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171812.n8HICAvd005911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mattias.ellert at fy | |sast.uu.se) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171813.n8HIDGN2006179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mattias.ellert at fy | |sast.uu.se) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171824.n8HIOfcj029248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-17 14:24:39 EDT --- Updated spec and src.rpm files can be found here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171826.n8HIQnqq030393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 14:26:47 EDT --- But the SVN revision doesn't tell you anything about when the checkout was taken, which is information we are trying to capture here. You are more than welcome to include the SVN revision as outlined in the guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171840.n8HIe63u001911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-17 14:40:05 EDT --- $ rpmlint globus-gram-protocol.spec ../SRPMS/globus-gram-protocol-7.4-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/globus-gram-protocol-doc-7.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/globus-gram-protocol-* globus-gram-protocol-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-gram-protocol/globus-gram-protocol-libs/libglobus-gram-protocol globus-gram-protocol-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation First is known bug in rpmlint, fixed in testing. Documentation is in doc package. Follows the globus packaging guidelines. Koji okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1687010 a standard globus lib package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 18:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171847.n8HIlK9h003574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #40 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-17 14:47:17 EDT --- it's the wrong place to argue the toss, and i'm going to change the package, but i can't resist =) that's what I thought at first, then I thought 'no, that doesn't quite add up either'. after all, *non*-pre-release packages don't convey that information in their evr either. kernel-2.6.31-1.fc12 doesn't give you any information on when kernel 2.6.31 was released, does it? you have to go look that up somewhere else. SVN revision 123456 does give you date information just as conveniently as a version tag in a regular package does - all you have to do is go upstream and find out when that SVN rev hit. anyway, yeah, it's not particularly on-topic here. just worries my consistency bone. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524071] New: Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524071 Summary: Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lunatic-python.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lunatic-python-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Lunatic Python is a two-way bridge between Python and Lua, allowing these languages to intercommunicate. Being two-way means that it allows Lua inside Python, Python inside Lua, Lua inside Python inside Lua, Python inside Lua inside Python, and so on. See spec's URL field for a set of examples to test this package on. I plan to add unit tests once lua-lunit enters Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171907.n8HJ74If008433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 15:07:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171911.n8HJBCm0020580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 15:11:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171912.n8HJCwAT020842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 15:12:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171910.n8HJACgn020202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 15:10:11 EDT --- Email address thomaj at fedoraproject.org is not a valid bugzilla email address. Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. Please correct and reset the fedora-cvs flag. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171914.n8HJE7dL021230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 15:14:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171919.n8HJJcXf011505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #9 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-17 15:19:37 EDT --- A corrected version, addressing all the remarks, has just been uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171918.n8HJIpcQ011400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-17 15:18:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I think a more robust description of where Source0 comes from is needed per > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL Is this better? # Use the following commands to generate the tarball: # git clone http://www.lichteblau.com/git/ldapvi.git # git archive --prefix=ldapvi/ HEAD | bzip2 >ldapvi.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171926.n8HJQijG013666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #15 from Stephen Warren 2009-09-17 15:26:42 EDT --- FYI, http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2009-September/001036.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171936.n8HJaxte026655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #16 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-17 15:36:57 EDT --- nic, are you going to go ahead and do the package? everything's in place for you now. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 19:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171957.n8HJvVHF031688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(e at arix.com) | --- Comment #8 from Erick Calder 2009-09-17 15:57:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'd suggest using %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 here. I should have thought of that :) > There is missing 'Requires: httpd%{?_isa}' otherwise the package could be > installed into unowned directories and it also obviously would not be working > without httpd. well... I didn't add a Requires field because the manuals say not to; that one should rely on the dependency generator, although it seems that is a little lacking since it missed httpd (it did pick up on the need for GnuTLS): config(mod_gnutls) = 0.5.5-3.fc11 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgnutls.so.26 libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) so I've added it. thanks for picking up on that. latest version is -4 (see usual place for it) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172000.n8HK0KKc021980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-17 16:00:19 EDT --- we got this fixed up on IRC. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172000.n8HK01SF021610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-17 16:00:00 EDT --- (meant to copy-and-paste the Koji build URL, sorry) Koji F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1687259 rpmlint warnings on the binaries: frepple.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfrepple.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 frepple.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/freppledb/manage.py 0644 /usr/bin/env frepple.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/freppledb/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo frepple.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/freppledb/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/djangojs.mo frepple.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/freppledb/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo frepple.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/freppledb/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/djangojs.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. frepple-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot The libraries and header files needed for frePPLe development. frepple-doc.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Documentation subpackage for frePPLe. Changes look good so far. But.. the URL field should not be removed, really; it points to the program's homepage and is visible to the user (try rpm -qi on the produced RPM). Only Source1 needs to be removed as it's redundant and never referred to. Some tests still fail locally: ====================================================================== FAIL: callback ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./runtest.py", line 245, in runExecutable self.assertFalse("Difference in output") AssertionError ====================================================================== FAIL: name ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./runtest.py", line 245, in runExecutable self.assertFalse("Difference in output") AssertionError ====================================================================== FAIL: problems ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./runtest.py", line 245, in runExecutable self.assertFalse("Difference in output") AssertionError ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 37 tests in 50.983s FAILED (failures=3) make[1]: *** [check] Error 1 Any idea why they pass on the build server? Might it be that they terminate with no error if there is no Internet connection, but fail if there actually is? If you're planning to support only Fedora (and not EPEL, Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) then you can make the documentation subpackage noarch: %package doc ... BuildArch: noarch to be safe, though, in case some EPEL maintainers want to bundle this at some point in the future, you can %if-guard it as such: # noarch subpackages require RPM >= 4.6.0, available in F-10 or later # (and the upcoming RHEL 6). All Fedora versions are fine since the lowest # supported version is 10 %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 5 BuildArch: noarch %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172034.n8HKY65j029804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172052.n8HKqnjQ004155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 16:52:47 EDT --- I believe ConvertUTF.c is potentially non-free, as it only permits use "in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard" which sounds like a use restriction. Blocking FE-Legal for an opinion. Do note that ytnef is already in the distro. Perhaps it doesn't do what you need, but if this turns out to be non-free then it may have to do. Complete text of the ConvertUTF.c license: /* * Copyright 2001-2004 Unicode, Inc. * * Disclaimer * * This source code is provided as is by Unicode, Inc. No claims are * made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No warranties of any * kind are expressed or implied. The recipient agrees to determine * applicability of information provided. If this file has been * purchased on magnetic or optical media from Unicode, Inc., the * sole remedy for any claim will be exchange of defective media * within 90 days of receipt. * * Limitations on Rights to Redistribute This Code * * Unicode, Inc. hereby grants the right to freely use the information * supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the * Unicode Standard, and to make copies of this file in any form * for internal or external distribution as long as this notice * remains attached. */ /* --------------------------------------------------------------------- Conversions between UTF32, UTF-16, and UTF-8. Source code file. Author: Mark E. Davis, 1994. Rev History: Rick McGowan, fixes & updates May 2001. Sept 2001: fixed const & error conditions per mods suggested by S. Parent & A. Lillich. June 2002: Tim Dodd added detection and handling of incomplete source sequences, enhanced error detection, added casts to eliminate compiler warnings. July 2003: slight mods to back out aggressive FFFE detection. Jan 2004: updated switches in from-UTF8 conversions. Oct 2004: updated to use UNI_MAX_LEGAL_UTF32 in UTF-32 conversions. See the header file "ConvertUTF.h" for complete documentation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ */ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172057.n8HKvJ0k016140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-17 16:57:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > D'oh! I saw 0775 and my brain translated it into 0755 before handing it to my > logic unit. It's all my brain's fault. The logic unit worked fine. :-) Hope you've been able to reset your brain successfully. At least I'm relieved to hear I'm not the only one who got a buggy version. :) Here are a couple of further things I noticed: - you can drop BR: perl, tcsh as they are not necessary - BR: python-setuptools-devel should also be removed but the -python subpackage needs BR: python-devel - I suggest to preserve the timestamp of python-setuptools-devel by adding touch -r, e.g.: pushd doc/s3-2_files/ iconv -f WINDOWS-1252 -t UTF-8 master03_stylesheet.css > x.css touch -r master03_stylesheet.css x.css mv -f x.css master03_stylesheet.css popd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 20:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172055.n8HKtxxJ005251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-17 16:55:58 EDT --- I verified that this does not build. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package that builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] New: Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Summary: Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lhh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fence-virt/files/fence-virt.spec/download SRPM URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fence-virt/files/fence-virt-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm/download Description: A pluggable fencing framework for virtual machines The goal is to eventually replace fence_xvm/fence_xvmd in fence-agents with the included functionality. The reason this is a separate package from fence-agents is the fact that this agent would pull in a very wide range of dependencies which should be avoided. For example, when a thin-hypervisor (e.g. oVirt) backend is written, the only requirements on the ring-0 operating system would be: fence-virtd-0.2 fence-virtd-ovirt-0.2 (or whatever the plugin name is) This division of dependencies will keep the ring-0 operating system image significantly smaller than would inclusion in the fence-agents package. Furthermore, since the host package does not strictly depend on anything cluster related (indeed, it could be configured *without* cluster parts!), it is fairly logical to separate it. [lhh at localhost rpm]$ rpmlint SPECS/fence-virt.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [lhh at localhost rpm]$ rpmlint SRPMS/fence-virt-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [lhh at localhost rpm]$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/fence-virt* fence-virt-compat.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virt-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/fence_xvm fence_virt fence-virtd.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-checkpoint.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-libvirt.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-multicast.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Warnings: Fence-virt-compat: The entire package is a symlink to fence_virt. It correctly conflicts with fence-agents and requires the fence-virt package (to which it links). Effectively, this symlink makes fence_virt behave like fence_xvm does today, and is wire-compatible with previous versions of fence_xvm. Documentation: Several warnings are plugin packages which admittedly need documentation (for example how to use them!). I hope to resolve these in a future release (say version 0.2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172115.n8HLF6v0021824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #1 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-17 17:15:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361571) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361571) Corrected spec file Evidently, the sourceforge.net propagated an incorrect copy of fence-virt.spec to its mirrors and is taking awhile to fix it. Here is the correct spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] New: Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Summary: Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.a.st.pierre at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: QBrew is a homebrewer's recipe calculator. You can create and modify ale and lager recipes as well as calculate gravity, color, and bitterness. QBrew includes a database of styles, grains, hops, and miscellaneous ingredients, plus a brewing tutorial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172118.n8HLIn0K022916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Harmsen 2009-09-17 17:18:48 EDT --- EXPLANATION: It was determined that the special permissions for CS.cfg and the signedAudit directory are in fact enforced when instances of the server are created after the rpm is installed. We do not, therefore, need to deliver these files with non-standard permissions. The current updated packages deliver this file (and directory) with standard permissions, and thus eliminate the rpmlint warnings. Rpmlint output is now clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172119.n8HLJTp0013212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fdinitto at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fdinitto at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172131.n8HLVsUJ017566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522245 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172132.n8HLWgxA017877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172132.n8HLWiQG017905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Bug 522245 depends on bug 490988, which changed state. Bug 490988 Summary: Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172131.n8HLVqjt017516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |490988 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-17 17:31:51 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/vdpauinfo-0.0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/vdpauinfo.spec Description: Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 21:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172131.n8HLVw6r017606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-17 17:31:57 EDT --- I am not sure that I like the %{ooo} define too much - also the current package guidelines state that %global should be used instead of %define. But I wouldn't substitute this part of the URLs by a macro at all. That is a minor issue you can fix before commit. rpmlint output: rpmlint -v ../SRPMS/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-4.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/mod_gnutls-0.5.5-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/mod_gnutls-debuginfo-0.5.5-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm mod_gnutls.src: I: checking mod_gnutls.x86_64: I: checking mod_gnutls.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/mod_gnutls 0700 mod_gnutls-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The non-standard-dir-perm error is not a problem as this permission is right. The package is APPROVED. I will sponsor you for Fedora packaging when you create an account in the Fedora Account System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 22:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496697] Review Request: ikvm - This package provides IKVM.NET In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172205.n8HM5ZRQ031184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496697 --- Comment #3 from Colin Coe 2009-09-17 18:05:34 EDT --- Ah, thanks for the clarification :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 22:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172228.n8HMSfpZ016953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 Dylan Swift changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dylan.swift at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 22:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] New: Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 Summary: Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dylan.swift at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/nmonfedora/home/nmon-12d-1-src-rpm/nmon-12d-1.src.rpm?attredirects=0 SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/nmonfedora/home/nmon-12d-1-src-rpm/nmon.spec?attredirects=0 Description: This systems administrator, tuner, benchmark tool gives you a huge amount of important performance information in one go. The data can be accessed in two ways: 1. On screen (console/terminal based using curses) 2. Dump to CSV file (data can be accessed using 'nmon analyser excel 2000 spreadsheet', added to rrd database, or read via your own tools) This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor I also need hosting space -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 22:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172229.n8HMTwOX007533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #82 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-17 18:29:42 EDT --- Any NEWS from the SongBird Legals (and improvement on the rpath issue for the packaging side)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 23:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172309.n8HN9l1A030890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 --- Comment #4 from Rob Crittenden 2009-09-17 19:09:45 EDT --- Lots better, thanks. I think that the git revision should be in the spec somewhere too (even if not part of the n-v-r). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 23:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523355] Review Request: kio_gopher - Gopher KIO slave for Konqueror In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909172358.n8HNwZW7005061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523355 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2009-09-17 19:58:34 EDT --- Imported, built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 00:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180027.n8I0RJgH024027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 00:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180027.n8I0RVib014131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 00:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180051.n8I0pIAA030338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #30 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-17 20:51:16 EDT --- Is this review request still ongoing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180104.n8I14E24022401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-17 21:04:11 EDT --- Thanks, Zach I hope Yaakov is still interested in this now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180101.n8I11wQD022114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-17 21:01:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be > updated to newer versions first. Heh - the former two are your packages. ;-) Anyway I just built cpphs-1.9 and hscolour-1.15 for f12. Will do ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.1.4 shortly after the new cpphs is in the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180109.n8I19J44000956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #16 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-17 21:09:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be > > updated to newer versions first. > > Heh - the former two are your packages. ;-) > Anyway I just built cpphs-1.9 and hscolour-1.15 for f12. Well, yes, I need to update my packages too :). > Will do ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.1.4 shortly after the new cpphs is > in the buildroot. Ah, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180120.n8I1KTJ6003566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180133.n8I1XZ2T027814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180138.n8I1cSvU006699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #7 from David Lutterkort 2009-09-17 21:38:27 EDT --- Forgot: please also do a koji scratch build after you fix the package with 'oji build --scratch dist-f12 $SRPM', include the URL to the koji build here, run rpmlint on the resulting rpms and paste+comment on its output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180137.n8I1b2RI006501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lutter at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from David Lutterkort 2009-09-17 21:37:01 EDT --- When I try to build this locally on my F11 machine, I get this error: + cd SELinux + for selinuxvariant in mls strict targeted minimum + make NAME=mls -f /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile /bin/sh: tmp/ovirt-node-selinux.mod.fc: No such file or directory make: *** [tmp/ovirt-node-selinux.mod.fc] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /local/rpmbuild/tmp/rpm-tmp.tIDvYt (%build) When I do a rpmbuild -bs ovirt-node.spec, it produces this error (which seems non-fatal): sed: can't read /usr/share/selinux/devel/policyhelp: No such file or directory A scratch build in rawhide succeeds, but rpmlint produces these errors: ovirt-node.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency cyrus-sasl-lib ovirt-node.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.97 ['1.0.2-0.fc12', '1.0.2-0'] ovirt-node.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ovirt-release ovirt-node.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/default/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.d/ovirt-logrotate ovirt-node.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/logrotate.d/ovirt-logrotate.conf ovirt-node.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/cron.hourly/ovirt-kinit ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chkconfig.d/collectd ovirt-node.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/default/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/collectd.conf.in ovirt-node.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/ovirt-logrotate.conf ovirt-node.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/selinux/targeted/ovirt-node-selinux.pp /usr/share/selinux/minimum/ovirt-node-selinux.pp ovirt-node.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/selinux/strict/ovirt-node-selinux.pp /usr/share/selinux/targeted/ovirt-node-selinux.pp ovirt-node.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/ovirt-kinit ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-post ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-post ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-post ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-post ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-early ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-early ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-early ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 19 errors, 16 warnings. Please address these or explain why they do not matter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 02:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514311] Review Request: ovirt-node-recipe - oVirt Node image recipe and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180204.n8I249tV011724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514311 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lutter at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lutter at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from David Lutterkort 2009-09-17 22:04:08 EDT --- OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate No overall upstream license info is included. Since you are upstream, please consider adding one. The scripts do have GPLv2+ license notices though. On a related note, it would be much friendlier to change your release procedure so that the tarball contains everything in a toplevel ovirt-node-recipe-%{version} directory. OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc N/A - upstream does not include explicit license (though it should) OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Uses -buildroot instead of -root, but no biggie. The tag is generally spelled BuildRoot, not buildroot. OK - PreReq not used FIX - Source md5sum matches upstream This is a prerelease package. For that, either make a tarball available upstream, and include the full URL to it as Source0, or put a comment before Source0 explaining how the tarball was made. (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages) OK - No hardcoded pathnames OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent FIX - rpmlint is silent (Please run rpmlint yourslef in future reviews and paste its output into the review ticket) W: summary-not-capitalized oVirt Node image recipe that's ok, since oVirt likes to be spelled that way W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.93-0 ['1.0.2-0.fc12', '1.0.2-0'] please update the changelog FIX - Proper debuginfo packages This is a noarch package - no need to turn off debuginfo General question: the kickstart file references ovirt-node-{logos,release,selinux,stateless}, though now there is only an ovirt-node package. That seems to call for major breakage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 02:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180227.n8I2Raug007467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #3 from Peter Halliday 2009-09-17 22:27:35 EDT --- - why don't you use the default file permissions for %{_bindir}/pip? Because of the shebang at the top of the file, rpmlint complained when it wasn't 755. The default is 644 I believe. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK You don't say which file conflicts there were. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 03:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524071] Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180308.n8I3880L026927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524071 --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-17 23:08:07 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lunatic-python-1.0.1-0.1.bzr20090917.fc12.src.rpm Upstream has made some changes since 1.0; the code for this package is based on a branch I made in Launchpad, that I have submitted for merging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 03:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180327.n8I3R49n019926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-09-17 23:26:59 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libsvm New Branches: EL-5 Owners: dchen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 04:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513307] Review Request: Netdisco - A web-based network management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180457.n8I4vGVr013938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513307 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 00:57:14 EDT --- netdisco-0.95-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netdisco-0.95-4.el5?_csrf_token=419f74d478ed12ee5c3b14c347786d6e464094bd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 05:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523599] Review Request: perl-Try-Tiny - Minimal try/catch with proper localization of $@ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180551.n8I5pppK013523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523599 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-18 01:51:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] New: Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 Summary: Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/libnetdevname/libnetdevname.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/libnetdevname/ SRPM: libnetdevname-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The libnetdevname package contains development files required to build libnetdevname-based software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180631.n8I6VQke032663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #1 from srinivas 2009-09-18 02:31:25 EDT --- Initial rpmlint output: rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/libnetdevname.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at XXX ~]# rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/libnetdevname-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at XXXX~]# rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libnetdevname-* libnetdevname.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.2.fc11 ['0.0.2-1.fc11', '0.0.2-1'] libnetdevname.x86_64: E: useless-provides libnetdevname libnetdevname.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname <= 0.0.2-1.fc11 obsoletes libnetdevname = 0.0.2-1.fc11 libnetdevname.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname <= 0.0.2-1.fc11 obsoletes libnetdevname = 0.0.2-1.fc11 libnetdevname-devel.x86_64: E: useless-provides libnetdevname-devel libnetdevname-devel.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname-devel <= 0.0.2-1.fc11 obsoletes libnetdevname-devel = 0.0.2-1.fc11 libnetdevname-devel.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion libnetdevname-devel <= 0.0.2-1.fc11 obsoletes libnetdevname-devel = 0.0.2-1.fc11 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. Would be working on fixing on these errors and warnings. Will have an update soon on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180658.n8I6woxp027768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 02:58:49 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc11?_csrf_token=c5747d1256352147d26942d8b325d09aa53296c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180656.n8I6u3kk027097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-09-18 02:56:02 EDT --- Package built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 06:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180658.n8I6ws55007710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 02:58:54 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc10?_csrf_token=c5747d1256352147d26942d8b325d09aa53296c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180710.n8I7A8K4029935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #2 from srinivas 2009-09-18 03:09:45 EDT --- Took care of all the errors and warnings. Here's the rpmlint output after the changes done: rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libnetdevname-* 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at XXXX SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/libnetdevname-0.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at XXXX SPECS]# rpmlint libnetdevname.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/libnetdevname/libnetdevname.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/libnetdevname/ SRPM: libnetdevname-0.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180720.n8I7KpCh031829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 --- Comment #3 from Vitaly Mayatskikh 2009-09-18 03:20:50 EDT --- Yeah, this appeared after Emacs was changed from version 22 to 23 in Fedora 11. I'm trying to fix the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180723.n8I7NNK7012089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:23:22 EDT --- I will mark this as dead in some days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180722.n8I7MMKM032157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #10 from Erick Calder 2009-09-18 03:22:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I am not sure that I like the %{ooo} define too much ok, I yanked it out, release 5. > The package is APPROVED. > > I will sponsor you for Fedora packaging when you create an account in the > Fedora Account System. hurray! I have an account there already, what next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180725.n8I7PdAS012765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:25:37 EDT --- Mike, do you still want to proceed with this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180729.n8I7TO0S013097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(claudio at claudioto | |masoni.it) --- Comment #25 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:29:20 EDT --- Claudio, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180736.n8I7afQ6015019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180734.n8I7YlpC014392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:34:43 EDT --- *** Bug 451771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180734.n8I7YjpF014354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:34:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 523330 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520712] Review Request: deadbeef - audioplayer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180740.n8I7eSnP003583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520712 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180740.n8I7eDVv003527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180737.n8I7bu0G002928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180738.n8I7cgkk003050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-18 03:38:41 EDT --- 2.0 is still not available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180743.n8I7hgMo016217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487667] Review Request: perl-Net-XMPP2 - Implementation of the XMPP Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180743.n8I7hOwf004058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487667 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478531] Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180741.n8I7fNFN003887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478531 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487067] Review Request: autopsy - Graphical front end for The Sleuth Kit Forensics software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180744.n8I7if4q016384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487067 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 07:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180753.n8I7rCUV018459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #11 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-18 03:53:11 EDT --- Follow the instructions here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180805.n8I85Y9D009245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #20 from Erick Calder 2009-09-18 04:05:32 EDT --- I got sponsored today - yea! see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 so what's next with afraid-dyndns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470545] Review Request: Wanderlust - an advanced mail client for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180841.n8I8fYDN028684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470545 --- Comment #4 from Vitaly Mayatskikh 2009-09-18 04:41:33 EDT --- Packages were updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180854.n8I8sKd3030952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #28 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 04:54:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Thanks, Zach > > I hope Yaakov is still interested in this > now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;) A) we need this for bluetile too, were i hooked on it 2) I still use xmonad, bluetile is just for newbs, and imo does it right. D) Can the review go forward please or is there something you all need from me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 09:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180953.n8I9rlVO001316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #21 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 05:53:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > so what's next with afraid-dyndns? Wait for somebody doing the full review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181002.n8IA2j3q014608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478617] Review Request: zsync - Partial/differential file transfer client over HTTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181005.n8IA5Tun004189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478617 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181001.n8IA1Xcn003282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #75 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-18 06:01:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361621) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361621) awesome.spec-1.patch Some small cleanup: - integrate rctag macro - simplify removal of .in files and filelist which should make 3.4 testing easier :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478605] Review Request: arpcheck - Ethernet Layer 2 checking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181004.n8IA4cBC015336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478605 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181009.n8IA9Kq2016387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #11 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-18 06:09:18 EDT --- An updated version has been uploaded, addressing the rpmlint warnings and other remarks. >>Changes look good so far. But.. the URL field should not be removed, >>really; it points to the program's homepage and is visible to the user >>(try rpm -qi on the produced RPM). Only Source1 needs to be removed as >>it's redundant and never referred to. URL and Source fields are present in the spec file. Source1 is removed. >>Any idea why they pass on the build server? Might it be that they >>terminate with no error if there is no Internet connection, but fail >>if there actually is? The only test connecting to the internet is xml_remote. The others run completely local. What distinguish this subset of tests from the others is that they compile a seperate executable, linking with the frepple shared library. The other tests are using the frepple executable. The tests are expected to pass. The tests produce an output file test.out in their subdirectory. Its contents should explain the cause of the problem - my guess would be that it's a SH_LIBPATH issue... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524190] New: Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_line?= =?utf-8?q?s=E2=80=9D_environments?= Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/Gnomecanvasmm widget for ?boxes and lines? environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 Summary: Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/Gnomecanvasmm widget for ?boxes and lines? environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alibobar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dreamer.fedorapeople.org/drobilla/flowcanvas/flowcanvas.spec SRPM URL: http://dreamer.fedorapeople.org/drobilla/flowcanvas/flowcanvas-0.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: FlowCanvas is an interactive Gtkmm/Gnomecanvasmm widget for ?boxes and lines? environments (ie modular synths or interactive finite state automata diagrams). This is my first package ever and I still need a sponsor. I decided to package this software because I wanted to include Patchage in yum and this is one of its dependencies. Other packages I will make after this will be Patchage itself and it's other dependency: Raul. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181020.n8IAK1OA006957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 06:20:00 EDT --- Chris, have you already been sponsored? I can't find you in the account system, and in bug #435724 you mentioned you're looking for a sponsor. If this is still the case, please add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to the Blocks field above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181032.n8IAWbC0021577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #6 from Julian G 2009-09-18 06:32:36 EDT --- http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient.spec Thanks for your support :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 10:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181045.n8IAjtfT012100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #76 from Michal Nowak 2009-09-18 06:45:53 EDT --- Thanks Jens, patch accepted and appreciated -- it includes what I always wanted to :). http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-3.fc12.src.rpm Expect 3.4 RC pkg, when I a have chance to try it and feel it's usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181121.n8IBLH6x031991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-18 07:21:16 EDT --- As you can see, bug is reopened and still unfixed. If you want speedup - comment these bug in its bugtracker to fix error. Previous maintainer of Qutim-Jabber plugin is unaccessible for the long time for me. I think it is main reason... Also, as you known Fedora do not permit bundled libraries and built with it is prohibited. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181136.n8IBafGi022753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Chris St. Pierre changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181140.n8IBeXGf023559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 07:40:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181140.n8IBeimh003500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 07:40:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181139.n8IBdfsR002977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #7 from Colin Coe 2009-09-18 07:39:40 EDT --- Initial inspection 1) The changelog entry should be %version-%release i.e. 1.1.1-1 (without the %dist tag) 2) The files section should use macros i.e. /usr/share = %_datadir 3) There is an empty %doc tag 4) The group Application/Music is non-standard 5) Source0 should reference the full downloadable URL for the tarball 6) rpmlint reports mixed use of spaces and tabs on line of the spec file, please try and keep these consistent. Just use one or the other. More comments to follow. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 12:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181231.n8ICV4vY014968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 08:31:02 EDT --- I'm not a sponsor but nonetheless some quick comments: - the license tag must be BSD, as file LICENSE and the source headers mention the BSD license (two clause variant) - in %Source0, give the full URL to the tarball - Since with Fedora 10 it's not necessary to define a BuildRoot as rpm does this automatically. However, if you want to support older Fedora releases or EPEL <= 5, you have to define it this way: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - clear the execute flags of the source files, e.g. by adding find src -type f -exec chmod 0644 {} \; to the %prep section - in %files, replace %defattr(-,root,root) by %defattr(-,root,root,-) - add the files AUTHORS, ChangeLog, and TODO to %doc - add the version and revision number to the changelog entry: ... - 0.4.1-1 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/qbrew-* qbrew.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog chris.a.st.pierre at gmail.com ['0.4.1-1.fc11', '0.4.1-1'] qbrew.i586: W: invalid-license Any permissive qbrew.src: W: invalid-license Any permissive qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: invalid-license Any permissive qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qbrew-0.4.1/src/textprinter.h qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qbrew-0.4.1/src/textprinter.cpp qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qbrew-0.4.1/src/configure.cpp qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qbrew-0.4.1/src/configure.h qbrew-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/qbrew-0.4.1/src/qbrew.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 12:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181234.n8ICYchl003190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 08:34:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 12:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181251.n8ICpAjZ019059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 08:51:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - in %Source0, give the full URL to the tarball Typo, sorry. I meant the Source0 field should contain the full URL to the tarball. BTW, the spec file in the SRPM and http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew.spec are not identical. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181312.n8IDCONG023654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-18 09:12:23 EDT --- 1] i didn't see there usage of fedora compiler flags. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags 2] md5sum of download from SOURCE is different from tar which is in src.rpm b6043dececbaa61e8a3b26a2bda33d38 clc-0.01.tar.gz ed6d17913a6f8e1d9db4a210f5edef34 SOURCES/clc-0.01.tar.gz 3] macros usage use only one style of macros or variable. not both in one spec file. so you eiter replace variables with corresponding macros or macros with variables. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros otherwise it looks good spec file is in english and have correct name directories, files and ownership is correct compiling/building ok dependencies ok clean section present please fix 1],2],3]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181327.n8IDR0nh014850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-18 09:26:58 EDT --- Ugh. The spec file is a mess, too much definitions, too much commented bits and so on. - Is the license statement really necessary? After all, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files - You have defined %defattr(-,root,root), so there's no need to define %attr(-,root,root) for every single object in %files. - The comment ## Without Requires something, rpmbuild will abort! is nonsense. Rpmbuild will abort if you have an empty Requires: line, but if you don't have any requirements, the package builds fine. - You should drop ## Without AutoReqProv: no, rpmbuild finds all sorts of crazy ## dependencies that we don't care about, and refuses to install AutoReqProv: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181333.n8IDX748028016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-18 09:33:06 EDT --- - Drop the 'rm' statements from %prep, they are not necessary. - Drop the patch and the hard link, they are not necessary. Instead, just compile the program manually in %build (the makefile is trivial and badly written) with gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D JFS -D GETUSER -D LARGEMEM -o nmon lmon%{version}.c - In %install, just run rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT install -D -p -m 755 nmon $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/nmon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181334.n8IDYgfX028260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-18 09:34:41 EDT --- - Add %{?dist} to your release tag. - Drop the explicit Require, it's automatically picked up by rpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181342.n8IDgMX8030135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-18 09:42:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Drop the patch and the hard link, they are not necessary. Instead, just > compile the program manually in %build (the makefile is trivial and badly > written) with > gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D JFS -D GETUSER -D LARGEMEM -o nmon lmon%{version}.c > > - In %install, just run > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > install -D -p -m 755 nmon $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/nmon I believe it is better to fix the build system and send the fixes upstream. That way other distributions won't have to invent their own workarounds. And since this software is really simple to build, it shouldn't be too difficult to fix the default build target and add an install target to the Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181345.n8IDjbdS018456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #2 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-18 09:45:37 EDT --- Spec files on sf.net have been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] New: Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Summary: Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/libclaw-1.5.4-1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/libclaw.spec Description: Claw (C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful) is a C++ library of various utility functions. In doesn't have a particular objective but being useful to anyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181351.n8IDpWI4019811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-18 09:51:31 EDT --- Yes, but IMHO that patch does not fix the brokenness of the upstream makefile, it's still hopelessly complicated. (Actually, I'm missing -lncurses in the compile command in comment #2). Just a simple makefile would do: ** CC=cc CFLAGS=-g -O2 -Wall LDFLAGS=-lncurses EXTRADEFS= default: nmon nmon: nmon.c $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -D JFS -D GETUSER -D LARGEMEM $(EXTRADEFS) $(LDFLAGS) -o nmon nmon.c ** Normally, one would just run $ make and if one is on special architectures, like power or mainframe which need special definitions, one would run e.g. $ make EXTRADEFS="-D POWER" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 13:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181358.n8IDwTta021049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #4 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-18 09:58:28 EDT --- Specfile and SRPM updated. Your rpmlint gave loads more errors than mine; is there an extra magical rpmlint config file out there somewhere? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181413.n8IED50a004460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 10:13:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Your rpmlint gave loads more errors than mine; is there an extra magical > rpmlint config file out there somewhere? No, I don't think so. I just ran rpmlint over all rpm files created by mock (srpm, binary rpm, and rpm containing the debuginfo). As you can see in the output above, most warnings were related to the debuginfo package. Maybe you simply left it out in your check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181428.n8IESktp008404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 10:28:45 EDT --- As far as I can see, there's not much to correct. In the %files section, you should change the %defattr and %attr settings like this: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README LGPL %{_bindir}/mutrace %attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/libmutrace.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181437.n8IEbv2m030350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-18 10:37:56 EDT --- Umh, shared libraries should have 755 attributes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181449.n8IEnckY013444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #4 from Julian Aloofi 2009-09-18 10:49:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - why don't you use the default file permissions for %{_bindir}/pip? > > Because of the shebang at the top of the file, rpmlint complained when it > wasn't 755. The default is 644 I believe. OK, makes sense, was just asking. > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK > > You don't say which file conflicts there were. Oops sorry, that section is OK too. You can also leave %{python_sitelib}/* in the file sections as it is if you want. Have you tried asking upstream for a COPYING file? Apart from that I don't see any problems with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] New: Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 Summary: Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: XiaShing at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sympa.spec SRPM URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sympa-6.0b.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sympa is an electronic mailing list manager. It is used to automate list management functions such as subscription, moderation, archive and shared document management. It also includes management functions which would normally require a substantial amount of work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 14:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181459.n8IExGKB002260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #83 from David Halik 2009-09-18 10:59:05 EDT --- The only place ORIGIN is used is within the xulrunner package itself and only when SunOS is detected. As I stated before, I'm not sure how to fix this if it's not supposed to be used in the first place. I've tried many methods, but none have helped. I can remove the appropriate sections, but considering it's for solaris, I doubt it will make a difference. Someone with more expertise than me would probably be better at fixing the ORIGIN issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181507.n8IF72Fl004188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-18 11:07:01 EDT --- Thanks to Danny for help, new packages (using the released source but patched to be compilable on Fedora) are on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ldapvi-1.7-9.fc12.src.rpm http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ldapvi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181513.n8IFDHrZ005380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 11:13:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Umh, shared libraries should have 755 attributes. Yes, I also wanted to write that. But as the library is intended to be used with LD_PRELOAD only, it's not absolutely necessary. At least, LD_PRELOAD also works with libraries having 0644 permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181514.n8IFE8uE018798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-18 11:14:06 EDT --- formal review is here: OK source files match upstream: d1cde4cbb618180f9ae0e77c56a1520b8ad61c9a ldapvi-1.7.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181538.n8IFcmla010580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-18 11:38:46 EDT --- Well, LD_PRELOAD'ed library can have 0644 permission. The point is that: on Fedora every ELF binaries must have executionable permission when %install ends, otherwide find-debuginfo.sh won't work correctly. So at the stage %install ends, libmutrace.so cannot be 0644 permission. We can change the permission by rpm's %attr explicitly after find-debuginfo.sh strips binaries like this, however we usually just say "shared libraries should have 755 attributes" because it is much simpler. By the way I think it is better to move libmutrace.so to under %_libexecdir/%name or so because this does not seem to be system-wide library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181547.n8IFlN9R026676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #5 from Lennart Poettering 2009-09-18 11:47:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > By the way I think it is better to move libmutrace.so to under > %_libexecdir/%name > or so because this does not seem to be system-wide library. We cannot do this due to the madness that is multilib. We need to make sure that ld.so uses /usr/lib/libmutrace.so for 32bit and /usr/lib/libmutrace.so for 64bit processes. If we moved that .so into a subdir then we had to hardcode its path in $LD_PRELOAD which would break ld.so's automatic selection of the module to load. So, no can do. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181548.n8IFmUDS013213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #6 from Lennart Poettering 2009-09-18 11:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > We cannot do this due to the madness that is multilib. We need to make sure > that ld.so uses /usr/lib/libmutrace.so for 32bit and /usr/lib/libmutrace.so for Oops, that second path should have been /usr/lib64/libmutrace.so of course. Sorry for the confusion. > 64bit processes. If we moved that .so into a subdir then we had to hardcode its > path in $LD_PRELOAD which would break ld.so's automatic selection of the module > to load. So, no can do. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524277] New: Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524277 Summary: Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: XiaShing at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dbacl.spec SRPM URL: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dbacl-1.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: dbacl is a general purpose digramic Bayesian text classifier. It can learn text documents you provide, and then compare new input with the learned categories. It can be used for spam filtering, or within your own shell scripts. Sometimes it plays chess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 15:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181558.n8IFw7L9015332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #7 from Lennart Poettering 2009-09-18 11:58:06 EDT --- .spec file is now fixed according to the comments: Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181619.n8IGJmF7002748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-18 12:19:47 EDT --- I did a quick and dirty package for this the other day, but didn't bother to put it under review as the package needing it is not really interesting at the moment (plee-the-bear, an game at early stage of development). Anyway, you might want to take a look, I spotted a few differences : - BuildRequires: zlib-devel - -devel needs to require cmake for %{_datadir}/cmake/Modules ownership - move docs to another place - fix for file encoding and end of lines - %check section Also, you fixed the early stripping, which I did not do. Here's my spec and SRPM if you want to take a look : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libclaw.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libclaw-1.5.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524283] New: Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Summary: Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/plee-the-bear.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/plee-the-bear-0.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Plee the Bear is a 2D platform game like those we found on consoles in the beginning of the 90's. The basis of the scenario fit in few lines: 4 PM or so, Plee wakes up, tired. He has dreamed again about that awesome period when he went across the entire world together with his belle. He puts his leg in the honey pot... empty! Moreover every single honey pot in the house is empty. "One more trick of that kid", he thinks. "I'm going to give him such a wallop of which he sure will remember". Following honey drops on the ground, Plee reaches the edge of the forest. Beginning of the game. The game is led by Julien Jorge and Sebastien Angibaud. Nevertheless, the game counts several contributions from external people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181634.n8IGYFa8024973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-18 12:34:14 EDT --- %file section must use macros. /sample is a big no-no. The apache conf is missing list creation from the UI is probably not working etc... This needs a lot more work. I did not really take a look at sympa 6.0 yet, but I worked on packaging 5.4 some time ago and it needed much more magic, even if 6.0 is supposed to be much more friendly wrt FHS now. My work is far from finished, hence I did not submit it, but you might want to take a look. http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/sympa.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympa-5.4.7-3.fc10.src.rpm I'll try to help as much as I can with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181643.n8IGhjHb007932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-18 12:43:44 EDT --- ah, indeed, libclaw is for plee-the-bear :-) Again, here are my unfinished spec and srpm, in case there is anything of interest : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/plee-the-bear.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/plee-the-bear-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181650.n8IGoiGc009856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-18 12:50:43 EDT --- Doesn't this require not-yet-upstream kernel code? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524283] Review Request: plee-the-bear - 2D platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181648.n8IGmvCl009090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524283 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |524238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 16:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181648.n8IGmvAI009115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |524283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181723.n8IHNReE016953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:23:25 EDT --- This whole thing is confusing. If you already maintain packages in Fedora, you don't require sponsorship. I'm not sure why Chris blocked FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Your FAS ID is andriy, isn't it? Could you consider updating to 0.5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181725.n8IHPIP4017690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:25:16 EDT --- Given all of the legal issues surrounding this package, I suspect any reviewer is going to want the legal folks to sign off first. I've blocked FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181729.n8IHThas005513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-18 13:29:42 EDT --- A couple of quick comments: * the license tag must be GPLv2+ * This is a pre-release, so you have to take care of the version and release number. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease - Version: 6.0 - Release: 0.X.b2%{?dist} (X is the revision number to increase) * remove the build target (.f11) from the changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181729.n8IHTgSe018296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:29:37 EDT --- Was there ever any progress on this package? I wouldn't object to those build dependencies, though these days we prefer using "tex(latex)" in Fedora to avoid talking about any specific TeX distribution. I've honestly no idea what might be required for EPEL as it's getting so far behind in packaging now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181736.n8IHahOc020009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-09-18 13:36:41 EDT --- I saw the configure script checking for /bin/sh, which is why I added the tcsh BR. I didn't notice that nothing actually USES /bin/sh.... Good catch. I have made all of the changes you suggested in comment 6. New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181737.n8IHbJhx007844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-18 13:37:18 EDT --- *sigh* sorry about that -- your bugzilla email is different than your FAS email (andy.shevchenko at gmail.com) so my reviewing script flagged you as unsponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181752.n8IHqhjn023285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:52:43 EDT --- Might I add that the Summary: doesn't say what the package does. Also, this fails to build for me in rawhide, x86_64: Processing files: libclaw-1.5.4-1.fc12.x86_64 error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libclaw-1.5.4-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib64/*.so.* Please clear the whiteboard when you have a buildable package. I suggest providing a link to a successful koji scratch build in your reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524277] Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181749.n8IHnvjW022520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524277 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:49:57 EDT --- Fails to build for me in rawhide: gcc -funsigned-char -Wall -pedantic -O3 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o bayesol bayesol.o fram.o risk-lexer.o risk-parser.o probs.o util.o jenkins.o jenkins2.o mtherr.o igam.o gamma.o const.o polevl.o isnan.o ndtr.o -lm risk-lexer.o: In function `yylex': /builddir/build/BUILD/dbacl-1.9/src/lex.yy.c:941: undefined reference to `yywrap' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [bayesol] Error 1 Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package that builds properly. I suggest providing a link to a successful koji scratch build in your reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 17:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181757.n8IHvGKj024268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 13:57:15 EDT --- This fails to build for me; the patch doesn't apply: Patch #0 (flowcanvas-0.5.1.include-stdint.patch): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/flowcanvas-0.5.1.include-stdint.patch + /usr/bin/patch -s -p0 -b --suffix .include-stdint --fuzz=0 The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /home/dreamer/rpmbuild/BUILD/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Connection.hpp.orig 2009-09-12 14:18:52.000000000 +0200 |+++ /home/dreamer/rpmbuild/BUILD/flowcanvas-0.5.1/flowcanvas/Connection.hpp 2009-09-12 14:19:20.000000000 +0200 -------------------------- File to patch: Skip this patch? [y] 1 out of 1 hunk ignored RPM build errors: Please try to ensure that your packages build properly before submitting them for review. If you read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers you can find instructions on using our build system to do scratch builds. Please clear the Whiteboard when this package is ready to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181807.n8II7jRo026298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails Bug 516281 depends on bug 515079, which changed state. Bug 515079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 14:07:44 EDT --- This fails to build for me because there seems to be no package providing perl(Tk::ObjScanner). Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which can be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181810.n8IIASfI026992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181810.n8IIARbi026959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516281 Bug 516287 depends on bug 515079, which changed state. Bug 515079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 14:10:26 EDT --- This fails to build; it seems that it depends on another package which is in the review queue. You should set the ticket dependency fields appropriately so that we know the order in which the packages should be reviewed. Also, ""? Is it really so difficult to paste in the description? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516293] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181814.n8IIEJo7015422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516293 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails Bug 516293 depends on bug 515079, which changed state. Bug 515079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 14:14:18 EDT --- This fails to build; nothing in the distro provides perl(Config::Model::Backend::Augeas). Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which can be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520621] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181822.n8IIMKfd029677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520621 --- Comment #2 from Ritesh Raj Sarraf 2009-09-18 14:22:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The spec needs a lot of fixing, therefore I added NotReady to the status > whiteboard. Please remove it after you have addressed these issues: > > 1) The spec does not match the srpm, the spec is for version 1.51, but the srpm > is for version 1.50 Hmmm!! I'm not sure. I think I linked the r1.50 file. > 2) GPL is not a valid license tag, it might be GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, ... > You can find more information about this here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL Done > 3) Vendor and Packager should not be used: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Tags I used it because the .spec file you reviewed is something I'm going to be shipping with the upstream tarball. One of my goals with that spec is to make it RPM distro generic. > 4) The Distribution tag should probably not be used, but I asked on > fedora-packaging about this Same as 3 > 5) The init script should not be started automatically in %post imho, because > the user might first want to tweak laptop-mode before it is started It shouldn't harm. The default settings of laptop-mode-tools thrive to give you a basic power saving profile. If it is a policy, I can disable it. > 6) %{_usr}/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d must not be owned by laptop-mode-tools, it is > owned by filesystem for Fedora Rawhide (F12) Hmmm!!! I'm not sure how to handle this. We ship a hook there. > 7) The manpages in %files should hava an asterisk appended (*), because in the > Fedora buildsystem, the manpages will be gzipped, so the pattern won't match. Done > Also it is not needed to mark them as %doc, this is already done automatically What should be put as the default. > 8) %{_usr}/sbin should be %{_sbindir} and %{_usr}/share %{_datadir}, also it is > uncommon to use %{_usr} but to use %{_prefix} instead > Done. What about /usr/lib ? > You also need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, because you do not have submitted any > package to Fedora. Here is more information about the whole process: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Going through it. Thank you for reviewing. I am attaching a separate .spec because the spec I ship with the tarball needs to be generic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520621] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181824.n8IIOUJ1030082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520621 --- Comment #3 from Ritesh Raj Sarraf 2009-09-18 14:24:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361704) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361704) spec file updated spec file for laptop-mode-tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181834.n8IIY88Y031800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-18 14:34:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Was there ever any progress on this package? I've been keeping an eye on upstream and submitting patches, mostly related to circular dependencies and weak links. However, most of the problems haven't been fixed. For example, see: http://code.google.com/p/coot/source/browse/trunk/ideal/Makefile.am and the commented out sections. 0.6.1 is due out soon, and I have more recent versions of the package based on SVN builds that are essentially "pre" packages, so I've been kind of sitting on this until 0.6.1 arrives. > I wouldn't object to those build > dependencies, though these days we prefer using "tex(latex)" in Fedora to avoid > talking about any specific TeX distribution. I've honestly no idea what might > be required for EPEL as it's getting so far behind in packaging now. Sure, I'll make the edits to the .spec and post something this afternoon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181839.n8IIdEmN020582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-18 14:39:13 EDT --- This is not a package review. This is more of a code review. I'm not really a fan of the API: extern int netdev_pathname_to_name (char *); This modifies the data you pass to it, which is ugly. Something like: extern int netdev_pathname_to_name (const char *name, char **ret); would be better. (Or, just directly return the name, and NULL on failure, setting errno appropriately.) In the absence of kernel support, all /dev/net names throw errors. Passing it the existing /dev/net/tun also errors. It only checks for /dev/net as a prefix. You pass it /dev/foo, or " bar", or other invalid device names... it returns them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 18:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181859.n8IIxkjp026165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-18 14:59:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > An updated version has been uploaded, addressing the rpmlint warnings and other > remarks. > > > URL and Source fields are present in the spec file. Source1 is removed. Ah, yes. Sorry about that: I'm used to looking at rpmdev-newspec created templates, which have slightly better formatting. > >>Any idea why they pass on the build server? Might it be that they > >>terminate with no error if there is no Internet connection, but fail > >>if there actually is? > > The only test connecting to the internet is xml_remote. The others run > completely local. > What distinguish this subset of tests from the others is that they compile a > seperate executable, linking with the frepple shared library. The other tests > are using the frepple executable. > The tests are expected to pass. The tests produce an output file test.out in > their subdirectory. Its contents should explain the cause of the problem - my > guess would be that it's a SH_LIBPATH issue... Will attach the failing test results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181901.n8IJ14BW007107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-18 15:01:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361708) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361708) test.out files from failing tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181905.n8IJ52K5029138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-18 15:05:01 EDT --- These packages address the issues in #8 - removed license - removed most commented bits - removed some %defines - removed %attr when not needed - removed rpmbuild comment - removed AutoReqProv: Updated spec and src.rpm files can be found here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca-1.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181904.n8IJ4830008168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 15:04:07 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The spec, being cpanspec generated, is nice and clean. I note that 1.28 is out, released well before you posted this review request. I checked the upstream changelog and it doesn't seem that there are any functional changes, so I'll go ahead and review the current version. However, beware that if you do update, there may be some dependency issues because packages reqired for the test suite are no longer listed in Build.PL. I note that the test suite skips one test: t/99-pod.t ........... skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD Generally this is a maintainer test anyway and its value to us is somewhat minimal, but I would suggest that you add a build dependency on perl(Test::Pod) anyway, because you'll at least be alerted of any issues with the documentation. The package still builds fine if you do this. If you fix that one minor issue, I'll approve this package and sponsor you. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 3834e317e49e7bee4133f82d41cbc43e8eda92c6cdcde6c282021c083e0dc8f0 Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext) = 1.27 perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext::Functions) = 0.13 perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext::Functions::_EMPTY) = 0.01 perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext::Functions::_EMPTY::i_default) = 0.01 perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext = 1.27-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.008 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Encode) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext) perl(Locale::Maketext::Gettext::Functions) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) ? %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=350, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.02 sys + 0.93 cusr 0.26 csys = 1.31 CPU) However, one test is skipped due to a missing build dependency. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181913.n8IJDO7Q011219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-18 15:13:23 EDT --- This does build fine for me in rawhide, and rpmlint is indeed silent. If this package really uses tkinter, shouldn't it depend on it in some way? Currently it only depends on python. Is there any point in packaging the obsolete editobj1 code instead of editobj2? The upstream web site refers only to editobj2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181958.n8IJwrvS022607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181957.n8IJvvN8022495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #41 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-18 15:57:53 EDT --- ok, updated build with above points addressed: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.2-0.1.20090918svn2578.aw_fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181958.n8IJw0eG010261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-18 15:57:59 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ghc-cgi.src: W: strange-permission cgi-3001.1.7.1.tar.gz 0600 Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182010.n8IKAN8r012991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 Andy Gospodarek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(srinivas_ramanath | |a at dell.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182010.n8IKAAfu012937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #5 from Andy Gospodarek 2009-09-18 16:10:09 EDT --- So if I understand what's being done by this code (the git-tree at http://linux.dell.com/git/development/libnetdevname.git is empty, so I haven't looked at it much), it is really here to help user-space apps that would like to use an argument other than 'ethX' to identify the card, do so. Is that correct? This doesn't cover any of the work that creates the symlinks between /dev/ethX and /dev/net/by-chassis-label/Embedded_NIC_1. I also presume that 'Embedded_NIC_1' is a name coming from the BIOS. Is that also correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182027.n8IKREdj029054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #16 from Rene Ploetz 2009-09-18 16:27:11 EDT --- Well, I'm still interested in getting this package into Fedora (and getting sponsored), but as you said this review request hasn't been touched in months. I have no problems handing this request over to you hoping that this will speed up the inclusion process as the chances are slim that anyone will look at this after nearly a year of silence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182024.n8IKOcKj028281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-18 16:24:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-gnome2 New Branches: F-12 Owners: itamarjp mtasaka Early branch request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182028.n8IKSTQ4017023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #6 from narendra_k at dell.com 2009-09-18 16:28:28 EDT --- http://linux.dell.com/git/?p=development/libnetdevname.git;a=summary(In reply to comment #5) > So if I understand what's being done by this code (the git-tree at > http://linux.dell.com/git/development/libnetdevname.git is empty, so I haven't > looked at it much), it is really here to help user-space apps that would like > to use an argument other than 'ethX' to identify the card, do so. Is that > correct? > Yes. That is correct. I would look into why the link is not working. > This doesn't cover any of the work that creates the symlinks between /dev/ethX > and /dev/net/by-chassis-label/Embedded_NIC_1. I also presume that > 'Embedded_NIC_1' is a name coming from the BIOS. Is that also correct? Yes. 'Embedded_NIC_1' is coming from smbios table type 41. This link is created with the help of "biosdevname" tool( http://linux.dell.com/projects.shtml#biosdevname) which would take the os given name of the interface and return the bios given name. The udev rule would look like - KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="net/%k", MODE="0666" - would create /dev/net/ethN node and SUBSYSTEM=="net", PROGRAM="/sbin/biosdevname -i %k --policy=smbios_names", SYMLINK += "net/by-chassis-id/%c" would return 'Embedded_NIC_1' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 20:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182056.n8IKudAW026498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-09-18 16:56:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Doesn't this need an initscript to start the daemon? What about the config > file in /etc/orbited.cfg? Yes, I think this would be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 21:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182102.n8IL2kl6028551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-18 17:02:45 EDT --- Okay, lemme see what I can whip up (now that chromium is pushed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 21:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182101.n8IL1VK8028155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #7 from narendra_k at dell.com 2009-09-18 17:01:30 EDT --- http://linux.dell.com/git/?p=development/libnetdevname.git;a=summary(In reply to comment #5) > So if I understand what's being done by this code (the git-tree at > http://linux.dell.com/git/development/libnetdevname.git is empty, so I haven't > looked at it much), it is really here to help user-space apps that would like > to use an argument other than 'ethX' to identify the card, do so. Is that > correct? > Yes. That is correct. I would look into why the link is not working. > This doesn't cover any of the work that creates the symlinks between /dev/ethX > and /dev/net/by-chassis-label/Embedded_NIC_1. I also presume that > 'Embedded_NIC_1' is a name coming from the BIOS. Is that also correct? Yes. 'Embedded_NIC_1' is coming from smbios table type 41. This link is created with the help of "biosdevname" tool( http://linux.dell.com/projects.shtml#biosdevname) which would take the os given name of the interface and return the bios given name. The udev rule would look like - KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="net/%k", MODE="0666" - would create /dev/net/ethN node and SUBSYSTEM=="net", PROGRAM="/sbin/biosdevname -i %k --policy=smbios_names", SYMLINK += "net/by-chassis-id/%c" would return 'Embedded_NIC_1' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 21:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182105.n8IL5Vk7011859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #8 from Andy Gospodarek 2009-09-18 17:05:30 EDT --- Once I look at the code I'll be able to comment (and maybe wouldn't need to ask this question), but what happens if there is no symlink created. I wonder if the udev rule should call another script that can call biosdevname (and/or another application) so that this solution is not x86[_64]-specific (which I understand it to be right now based on the fact that biosdevname wouldn't run on ppc or arm). So when taking about the working case, is the next step that our configuration files will be based on the '/dev/net/by-chassis-label/Embedded_NIC_1' names rather than ethN since those devices might change names depending on when the modules are loaded? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 21:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182114.n8ILEmlV032620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #77 from Thomas Moschny 2009-09-18 17:14:45 EDT --- If someone is interested, I've built F11 packages and put them in a repo here: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/awesome/fedora-11. (Use at your own risk.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522525] Review Request: perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot - Object-oriented interface from perl/PDL to the PLPLOT plotting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182218.n8IMIbGJ023013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522525 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski 2009-09-18 18:18:36 EDT --- Checked in and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182235.n8IMZqvR012416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #5 from Dylan Swift 2009-09-18 18:35:52 EDT --- Thanks for the input Dominik & Jussi. I have implemented the changes in Jussi's comments and will refer Nigel (the original author) back to your comments Dominik as he has 'control' of the makefile. Jussi - if I add %{?dist} to the release tag then the src rpm becomes labelled with the os version. Is this normal? because this would mean having to release a different version for each current version of Fedora, where I think that the spec file could be modified to support all versions (adding any necessary changes when new releases are made). Does anyone know the normal method for testing this on alternate distributions. I have a qemu vm running Fedora 11, and have found a few issues which may or may not be to do with the new OS, or this particular installation, namely gcc builds with debug info in the rpm, rather than in a seperate rpm. I don't know if this is a rpmbuild or gcc issue. This does require fixing as it is issued as a warning when running rpmlint on the binary rpm files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524333] New: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524333 Summary: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Utilities for use with old-school dual head setups: namely not twinview / one big desktop, but rather two X screens. mouse-switchscreen: Change the mouse cursor from one screen to the other. Remembers the previous mouse position for each screen. mouse-wrapscreen: If you have an xorg.conf where both X screens are "separated" on the X coordinates, then the mouse cursor cannot cross. Which is sometimes desired, and sometimes not. Using mouse-wrapscreen you can configure them to be "uncrossable", and then run it in the background when you do want to be able to cross the cursor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] New: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Summary: Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Utilities for use with old-school dual head setups: namely not twinview / one big desktop, but rather two X screens. mouse-switchscreen: Change the mouse cursor from one screen to the other. Remembers the previous mouse position for each screen. mouse-wrapscreen: If you have an xorg.conf where both X screens are "separated" on the X coordinates, then the mouse cursor cannot cross. Which is sometimes desired, and sometimes not. Using mouse-wrapscreen you can configure them to be "uncrossable", and then run it in the background when you do want to be able to cross the cursor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182249.n8IMnupx016965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-09-18 18:49:53 EDT --- *** Bug 524333 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 22:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524333] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182249.n8IMnt5T016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524333 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-09-18 18:49:53 EDT --- argh... ;-) - sorry for the duplicate... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524332 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 23:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909182358.n8INwjYs007438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #3 from Gareth John 2009-09-18 19:58:43 EDT --- OK so other reviews closed will go ahead and review!? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190000.n8J005JM008107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 W. Michael Petullo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mike at flyn.org) | --- Comment #5 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-09-18 20:00:03 EDT --- This project's license is documented as LGPL at http://sourceforge.net/projects/webunit/develop/. Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/webunit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/webunit-0.4-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190004.n8J04O7t026626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:04:22 EDT --- quotatool-1.4.10-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190005.n8J05El8027299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:05:12 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyhunspell'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190006.n8J06vAu010844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:06:56 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190007.n8J0734M010898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7.1-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190004.n8J04Ylm009418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.10-7.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:05:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190005.n8J05a6c010245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:05:35 EDT --- pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyhunspell'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190005.n8J05Uec010195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:05:28 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update RackTables'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9705 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190006.n8J06FGX010535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:06:14 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-FormatTable'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9707 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190005.n8J05PYp010127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #4 from Gareth John 2009-09-18 20:05:23 EDT --- Rpmlint output maximus.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/maximus.schemas maximus.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/maximus-autostart.desktop 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. SOLUTION: non-conffile-in-etc W: foo-package non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/foo-package.menu A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. Solution:- under %files section you can add %config /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/foo-package.menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190010.n8J0A5NL029374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.5-5.el5 |0.8.5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190008.n8J08unD028701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:08:55 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-FormatTable'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190009.n8J09wst012096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:09:56 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190013.n8J0DGDX013496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:13:15 EDT --- mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mm-common'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0EP4k031181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #5 from Gareth John 2009-09-18 20:14:24 EDT --- Apologies, re. the above comment " %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here " is a better solution as noreplace flag error comes up after adding %config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0EiXh031381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:14:42 EDT --- ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0ERiw031213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:14:26 EDT --- dzen2-0.8.5-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0Ew3b031472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:14:57 EDT --- libvmime07-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0EY9Z031270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.5-5.fc10 |0.8.5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190011.n8J0BO6Y030121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:11:23 EDT --- mm-common-0.7.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mm-common'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9742 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521352] Review Request: libvmime07 - A powerful C++ class library for working with MIME/Internet messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190015.n8J0F4MI014474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.1-1.fc10 |0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190019.n8J0J6EE001034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:19:05 EDT --- RackTables-0.17.4-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update RackTables'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190020.n8J0Kofi017103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:20:48 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190020.n8J0KwRT017161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-3.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 01:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190151.n8J1plBe022581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 --- Comment #3 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-18 21:51:46 EDT --- Xavier, What should I put instead of /sample? RPM probably won't recognize that as any macro. When I built the source, it didn't have an apache.conf or httpd.conf file. Martin, I removed .f11 from the changelog and modified the license tag. When using the version and release you suggested, RPM doesn't want to build the file as it can't cd into the directory. Also, I don't think it really matters since Sympa is a hard package, but I got a scratch build to build properly: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690769 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 01:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190156.n8J1u6na023358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #8 from Colin Coe 2009-09-18 21:56:05 EDT --- This fails building in koji. + desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/qmpdclient-1.1.1-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/applications --add-category X-Fedora /builddir/build/SOURCES/QMPDClient.desktop /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9iHeZb: line 39: desktop-file-install: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9iHeZb (%install) The file 'desktop-file-install' wasn't found. Can you please check the filename/path and providing package? Thanks CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 02:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190223.n8J2NLs6011528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG 2009-09-18 22:23:20 EDT --- Hi, Package works fine except rpmlint on emacs-jabber-el-0.8.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm emits "emacs-jabber.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/jabber-init.el" To fix the Error please refer https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#script-without-shebang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 03:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524277] Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190309.n8J39vJK021723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524277 --- Comment #2 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-18 23:09:56 EDT --- Hi Jason, New SPEC: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/dbacl.spec New SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/dbacl-1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm It failed on rawhide with BuildrootError: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690850 But it was successful on a dist-f11 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690860 What's the cause of the BuildrootError? I assume it's not entirely necessary to build on rawhide: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01792.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 03:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190333.n8J3Xu9E025896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-18 23:33:56 EDT --- We'd need for orbited to have some support of running as a daemon to do this right. Luke and I whipped up something and he is going to run it past upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190624.n8J6O4v3004961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #7 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-19 02:24:03 EDT --- Submitted my second package - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190623.n8J6N1KK004826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Alex Musolino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190621.n8J6LUoS004687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-19 02:21:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > When using the > version and release you suggested, RPM doesn't want to build the file as it > can't cd into the directory. Right. In this case you have to tell %setup the actual directory name: %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}b.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] New: Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Summary: Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musolinoa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra-1.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Avra is an assembler for Atmel's AVR 8-bit RISC microcontollers. It is mostly compatible with Atmel's own assembler, but provides new features such as better macro support and additional preprocessor directives. This is my second Fedora package. I'm still looking for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190644.n8J6iwGF023254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #14 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-19 02:44:57 EDT --- The difference between you local machine and the build machine is that you have the CherryPy package installed. Comparing the test.out files with the .expect files, one can verify the difference is coming from the following deprecation warnings generated by CherryPy. The deprecation warnings don't affect the functioning of frePPLe at all. >>/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cherrypy/lib/cptools.py:4: >>DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead >> import md5 >>/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cherrypy/lib/sessions.py:16: >>DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead >> import sha >>/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/cherrypy/_cperror.py:190: >>DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 >> self.message = message frePPLe uses CherryPy to implement an optional REST web service in Python code. I didn't list CherryPy as a dependency in the spec file. Should it be added? Since the web service will be used only by a limited subset of frePPLe users, I give an error message when a user tries to use the web service module for the first time. See the code in the file init.py: >>try: >> import cherrypy >>except: >> # Alternative definitions when cherrypy is not available. >> # We only want to report the missing module when the REST web service is >> # really used. >> def RESTwebservice(address=None, port=8080): >> raise ImportError, "no module named cherrypy" >>else: >> def RESTwebservice(address=None, port=8080): >> ... implementation of the web service ... Conclusion: The test failures can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 06:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190655.n8J6tTNi025018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 --- Comment #5 from Xia Shing Zee 2009-09-19 02:55:28 EDT --- New SPEC: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sympa.spec New SRPM: http://xiashing.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sympa-6.0-0.3.b2.fc11.src.rpm %doc was updated dist-rawhide fails with BuilldrootError: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690991 dist-f11 completes successfully: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690986 So a few more things to be done here: /sample in %file has to be changed. The apache conf is missing? I don't think it needs an apache conf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 07:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190729.n8J7ToXl030041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-19 03:29:49 EDT --- As far as I could see, this package is well done. As a minor improvement I suggest to explicitly list the name of the include directory in %files devel. That way it's easier to see that the header files actually go in a subdirectory: %{_includedir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_includedir}/* $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/openslide-* openslide-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning about the missing documentation in -devel can be ignored --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. GPLv2 according to file header comments and gpl-2.0.txt [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File containing the license text must be included in %doc. - gpl-2.0.txt added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha1sum openslide-2.2.0.tar.gz* 0a3b7dab1d8985085168290eaceacaf36312ec78 openslide-2.2.0.tar.gz 0a3b7dab1d8985085168290eaceacaf36312ec78 openslide-2.2.0.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1690974 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: Files must not be listed more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs packaged [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 09:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190920.n8J9K2Kj000361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #12 from Christian Krause 2009-09-19 05:20:00 EDT --- *ping* There was no response since over a month. Please reply if you are still interested in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 09:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190929.n8J9T59C001547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-19 05:29:04 EDT --- Looks fine to me. Just a couple of notes: - you should preserve the timestamps of the converted files: dos2unix -k AUTHORS iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 README -o README.new touch -r README README.new mv README.new README - remove INSTALL from %doc - NEWS doesn't contain any useful information either. You can drop it too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 09:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190947.n8J9lNHn020044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #2 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-19 05:47:22 EDT --- Made changes as per above. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra-1.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 10:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191016.n8JAGHBw010329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-19 06:16:16 EDT --- I'll do the review. If we get it in time for F-12, I'll add avra to the FEL-12 Livedvd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 10:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191041.n8JAffvD014588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 10:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191056.n8JAuGQ0031676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 11:05:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191105.n8JB5OXs000764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-19 07:05:23 EDT --- would you also package http://sourceforge.net/projects/side4linux/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 12:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191204.n8JC4JEk010856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-19 08:04:18 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 12:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191211.n8JCBI19012543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-19 08:11:17 EDT --- #001: Add Examples to %doc #002: Extract AVR000.zip and add the *.inc to /usr/share/avra-%{version} #003: remove "avra" binary in %prep before starting any processes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 12:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191235.n8JCZPOM001503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #20 from Till Maas 2009-09-19 08:35:23 EDT --- Jan, did you perform some inofficial reviews, like one is advised on the how to get sponsored wiki page[0]? [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Reviewing_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 14:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191416.n8JEGwiD000740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-19 10:16:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the input Dominik & Jussi. I have implemented the changes in Jussi's > comments and will refer Nigel (the original author) back to your comments > Dominik as he has 'control' of the makefile. > > Jussi - if I add %{?dist} to the release tag then the src rpm becomes labelled > with the os version. Is this normal? because this would mean having to release > a different version for each current version of Fedora, where I think that the > spec file could be modified to support all versions (adding any necessary > changes when new releases are made). Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11 srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM. > Does anyone know the normal method for testing this on alternate distributions. > I have a qemu vm running Fedora 11, and have found a few issues which may or > may not be to do with the new OS, or this particular installation, namely gcc > builds with debug info in the rpm, rather than in a seperate rpm. I don't know > if this is a rpmbuild or gcc issue. This does require fixing as it is issued as > a warning when running rpmlint on the binary rpm files. Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524378] New: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524378 Summary: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: singh.roshan08 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gscribble/files/gscribble/0.0.2/gscribble-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm/download or http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GScribble is a desktop client for blogging. The client is written in Python and PyGtk. Currently it supports Wordpress only, but it will support Blogger soon. With the new release GScribble supports HTTP proxy also. Note: This is my first package and I need a sponsor. I am the only developer of the the project currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] New: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Summary: Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: singh.roshan08 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gscribble/files/gscribble/0.0.2/gscribble-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm/download or http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/gscribble-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GScribble is a desktop client for blogging. The client is written in Python and PyGtk. Currently it supports Wordpress only, but it will support Blogger soon. With the new release GScribble supports HTTP proxy also. The current version is 0.0.2. Note: This is my first package and I need a sponsor. I am the only developer of the the project currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191615.n8JGFM6H004213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191613.n8JGDvB1003760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://sourceforge.net/proj | |ects/gscribble/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191619.n8JGJS6M019867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 12:19:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361772) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361772) picprog document html snapshot Well, for -3: * Timestamps - Add "-p" option when using "install" or "cp" commands to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Documents - Some png files are needed for installed document html file. Please also install them (see attached). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191627.n8JGRdhU021243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #1 from Roshan Singh 2009-09-19 12:27:38 EDT --- I have used rpmlint on the rpm I made for the package and I have fixed the error that I got. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191635.n8JGZOBp022596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #6 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-19 12:35:23 EDT --- Changes made as per above. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra-1.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm As for side4linux, I guess I can package it as well. However, it's not something I plan to use myself, so I'm not sure if I would be the best person to maintain it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 16:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191649.n8JGn8qs009091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #9 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-19 12:49:07 EDT --- Changes as per above. Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191701.n8JH1stY011403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #13 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-19 13:01:53 EDT --- sorry, this fell off my radar. I'll try to upload an updated spec/srpm later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191710.n8JHAxOV028080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 13:10:58 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (picprog) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191720.n8JHKvBu029760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 13:20:56 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191721.n8JHLia7014941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 13:21:42 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191732.n8JHWc0M031592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #11 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-19 13:32:37 EDT --- I've applied for the 'packager' group on the FA2. My FAS name is 'musolinoa'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191733.n8JHXFWa016852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 13:33:14 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191733.n8JHXxgF031779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 17:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] New: Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Summary: Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kchamart at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace.spec SRPM URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace-1.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: InTrace is a traceroute-like application that enables users to enumerate IP hops exploiting existing TCP connections, both initiated from local network (local system) or from remote hosts. It could be useful for network reconnaissance and firewall bypassing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 18:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191809.n8JI9umr023197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #1 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-19 14:09:55 EDT --- RPM lint result: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [build at f12-alpha SPECS]$ rpmlint intrace.spec intrace.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [build at f12-alpha SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/intrace-1.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm intrace.src: W: no-buildroot-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [build at f12-alpha SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/intrace-1.4.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 18:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191836.n8JIawsE027975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-19 14:36:57 EDT --- Will review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 18:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191857.n8JIvV0Z014065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #7 from Dylan Swift 2009-09-19 14:57:31 EDT --- > Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11 > srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM. Aha! Of Course! (somewhere, a light comes on) So just to clarify, what you're saying is that even if the f10 & f11 SRPMS are identical, there still needs to be two seperate SRPMS, rather than one without the %{?dist} tag? That now begs another question - do I need to change this 'review request' submission from rawhide to Fedora 10, and then submit another for Fedora 11? > Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? I do now, thanks. That has sorted it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 19:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909191930.n8JJU9hq004821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Christian Krause 2009-09-19 15:30:06 EDT --- I've reviewed the latest package: (In reply to comment #17) > Yay! Finally! I'm very sorry for the delay > > (In reply to comment #13) > > > > * naming: TODO > > - name matches upstream > > - spec file name matches package name > > - snapshot release tag (assuming it is a post-release snapshot) should contain > > the date (the svnrev can be appended, but the date is required) > > ( according to > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages ) > > > > Added Ok. > > * License: TODO > > - the package contains sources under the GPLv2, too: > > src/import/pmidi/except.c (GPLv2 as published), most likely this means > > that the complete package must be released as GPLv2 > > - the source package (and the built binary package) contain lots of examples > > and so it is necessary to check their legal status - in the worst case they > > must not only be stripped out from the binary but also from the sources - do > > you have any information whether they are distributable? > > - license file packaged: if the final package would be GPLv2, then we should > > not package GPLv1 > > > > I removed the midi and the xml files which have unclear licenses. Also removed > a can file with bad license. I created a new tarball and gave the instructions. > Upstream told me the program itself is GPLv2. Ok. Very minor glitch which will not hold the review: The comments about re-packaging the tarball are not consistent with respect to the SVN revision. The line with "wget" refers to release R1174. ;-) > > * Locales handling: TODO > > The package contains language files in a non-gettext format (*.qm files). > > Is it necessary to add them also via the %lang(xx) tag? > > > > Yes, we do this with qt applications. For instance, I was asked in the past > explicitly to mark the .qm files as %lang(xx) for qjackctl and qsynth Ok. (In reply to comment #18) > I fixed the compilation flags issue: Ok. > Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus.spec > SRPM URL: > http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc11.src.rpm All reported issues were fixed. I've done again a very small functional test and the main functions of the program seems to be working reasonable well. -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 20:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192029.n8JKTJQO014293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan at seekline.net --- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-19 16:29:18 EDT --- I had a look over the package and everything seems to be OK. All must-items of the ReviewGuidelines checked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 20:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192036.n8JKaQn7030937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-19 16:36:25 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1692046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 20:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192036.n8JKaQb3015707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Paulo Fidalgo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |o.kanniball.o at gmail.com --- Comment #34 from Paulo Fidalgo 2009-09-19 16:36:23 EDT --- I agree in using plowshare instead, I'm using and I'm very satisfied with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 20:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192053.n8JKroVU002388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-19 16:53:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I had a look over the package and everything seems to be OK. All must-items of > the ReviewGuidelines checked. Then maybe you'd be willing to perform the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 20:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192053.n8JKrLYI019495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-19 16:53:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11 > > srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM. > > Aha! Of Course! (somewhere, a light comes on) > > So just to clarify, what you're saying is that even if the f10 & f11 SRPMS are > identical, there still needs to be two seperate SRPMS, rather than one without > the %{?dist} tag? Not exactly. The RPMs built on different distributions from the same SRPM will be different. But in the review it is generally enough that the package builds in the development tree (rawhide). > That now begs another question - do I need to change this 'review request' > submission from rawhide to Fedora 10, and then submit another for Fedora 11? No. The %{?dist} tag is a SHOULD item, and comes from the fact that once the package has been approved and imported in Fedora CVS, you won't be able to build the package for e.g. Fedora 10 and Fedora 11, since the build system won't allow you to tag multiple spec files with the same version and release. > > Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? > > I do now, thanks. That has sorted it out. Funny, it should have been part of the standard package set for some time now.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 21:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192105.n8JL56r2023527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #64 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-19 17:05:01 EDT --- The license of the DES cipher, which goes into the jar files looks suspicious to me: THIS SOFTWARE IS NOT DESIGNED OR INTENDED FOR USE OR RESALE AS ON-LINE CONTROL EQUIPMENT IN HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTS REQUIRING FAIL-SAFE PERFORMANCE, SUCH AS IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION OR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, DIRECT LIFE SUPPORT MACHINES, OR WEAPONS SYSTEMS, IN WHICH THE FAILURE OF THE SOFTWARE COULD LEAD DIRECTLY TO DEATH, PERSONAL INJURY, OR SEVERE PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE ("HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES"). WIDGET WORKSHOP SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES. This might be nonfree. I am blocking FE-Legal. For references, please see the files: classes/ssl/src/ultra/README classes/ssl/src/ultra/DesCipher.java classes/ssl/src/tight/README classes/ssl/src/tight/DesCipher.java The full license statement can be found at the bottom of the above 2 README files. If FE-Legal decides that the DES cipher code is nonfree, these files (the corresponding java and jar files) cannot go into the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 21:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192104.n8JL44xY005772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) | --- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-19 17:04:03 EDT --- 1) I am now explicitly setting the CFLAGS in the spec file, which both adds the Fedora optimization flags and also overrides the Makefile's defaults (so the spec file has to include a couple flags specific to clc). 2) Annoyingly, the tarballs were identical in contents other than timestamps on the files. I made sure I have the tarball directly from upstream in SOURCES now. 3) The package is using the macros/variables consistently. I had $RPM_BUILD_ROOT only and no references to %{buildroot}. The link you provided states that I should use one or the other (with no official preference towards either) and that I should not mix usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in a single spec file, which I already complied with. I converted to the macro style anyway since it looks nicer IMO, and I used the macro style for %{optflags} as well. New files: Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 22:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192231.n8JMVbN2019958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-09-19 18:31:33 EDT --- *** Bug 524378 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 22:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524378] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192231.n8JMVZ0V019920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524378 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2009-09-19 18:31:32 EDT --- The other review request is identical except that it's mentionend, that a sponsor is needed. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524379 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 22:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] New: Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-xfswitch-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Xfswitch-plugin is a user switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel. It allows you to leave the current session opened and open a new session with another user. At the moment it relies on GDM, but other display managers will be supported in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 23:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192307.n8JN7fWN014979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-19 19:07:39 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ldapvi New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mcepl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 23:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909192328.n8JNSh2l021973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #14 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-19 19:28:41 EDT --- Spec URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #11) > IMHO having just two packages: > gpointing-device-settings > and > gpointing-device-settings-devel > would be better. DONE > * pkgconfig file: TODO > - The pkgconfig file contains the following linker flags: > Libs: -L${libdir} -lgpointing-device-settings > which won't work at all, since the library's name is "libgpds.so". Please > substitute the line with something like this: > Libs: -L${libdir} -lgpds DONE > > * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: TODO > I'm quite sure that the gpointing-device-settings is the regular configuration > dialog for the user to setup his mouse/touchpad preferences. Similar as it was > done in the gsynaptics package it must be available in the Preferences menu: > e.g. in System -> Preferences -> Pointing Device Settings > Please add the according .desktop file. DONE (.desktop file adapted from gsynaptic) > > * Obsoletes: TODO > - Obsoletes: the version must be greater than the version of the current > package, otherwise the current gsynaptics pacakge would not be obsoleted > Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.16-2 > DONE > * Scriptlets: TODO > - gconf: please adjust the GConf scriptlets according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf DONE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 01:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524423] New: Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 Summary: Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pierre.dorbais at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso.spec SRPM URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ciso is a little tool to compress/uncompress Sony PSP ISO image to CSO (Commpressed ISO) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 01:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200111.n8K1Bo2B019973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 Pierre Dorbais changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |i386 Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 01:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200128.n8K1Srgb007651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-19 21:28:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Thank you very much for the review. > > (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry for the late response. I came just back from 2 weeks of vacation. ;-) Ah, nice! > The new packages can be found here: > > Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp.spec > SRPM URL: > http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp-0-0.4.20090828.fc11.src.rpm Will review tomorrow; I had to dual-boot to Windows to do some .NET testing, and now am stuck waiting for a rather big download from a tediously slow server ([rant]seriously, upstreams should consider using BitTorrent with a private tracker -- [/rant]) > > Also, once clutter-gtk can be enabled (prod the maintainer for an update?) > > Unfortunately clutter-gtk is not yet released yet: > http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/clutter-gtk/0.10/ . I'll try to keep > this in mind and create a bug entry for clutter-gtk once 0.10.3 is released. > How about packaging a pre-release snapshot? As long as we know for certain -- or reasonably so -- that the final version will come out before we freeze for final, that's probably good enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 01:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200137.n8K1bqRX009397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-19 21:37:50 EDT --- Will make the final updates for the CVS import, thanks for noting them. Actually, I'll check if the SONAME for gnome-panel changes from one Fedora release to another; we'd probably be OK with just relying on the automatic requires: -- not on my Fedora machine now, so I can't test, but I'll verify this (note to self). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-applet-window-picker Short Description: Window picker applet for GNOME Owners: salimma Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 05:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200550.n8K5oFKv019705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #65 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-20 01:50:13 EDT --- It's not non-free, because of how it is worded. You may remember that we had a similar license from Sun which was non-free, because it said: "You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility." The reason it was non-free was because of the use of the term "licensed". This DES cipher license does not use the term "licensed", it simply uses "DESIGNED OR INTENDED". The license does not forbid use in any of these conditions, it merely states that the software was not designed or intended for those conditions. Lifting FE-Legal. P.S. Orcan, thanks for your continued due diligence here. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 05:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200552.n8K5qYlZ002809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 06:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200654.n8K6spC1011695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-20 02:54:50 EDT --- This is: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/UCD Free and GPL compatible. This is a bit tricky to interpret, but note that they grant the right to "freely use the information supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard", but do not restrict use in other ways. Use is a special case (as compared to other rights, such as copying/distribution/modification), where the "owner" of the software automatically has the right to use the software on their computer under Section 117 of the US Copyright Act, unless otherwise restricted by the copyright holder. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 07:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] New: Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 Summary: Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kchamart at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/nss_updatedb.spec SRPM URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/nss_updatedb-10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The nss_updatedb utility maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information. Used in conjunction with the pam_ccreds module, it provides a mechanism for disconnected use of network directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 08:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200805.n8K85J9C008210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #9 from Dylan Swift 2009-09-20 04:05:18 EDT --- > > So just to clarify, what you're saying is that even if the f10 & f11 SRPMS are > > identical, there still needs to be two seperate SRPMS, rather than one without > > the %{?dist} tag? > > Not exactly. The RPMs built on different distributions from the same SRPM will > be different. But in the review it is generally enough that the package builds > in the development tree (rawhide). That still confuses me - why then have different SRPMS if they contain the same course and SPEC files? > > That now begs another question - do I need to change this 'review request' > > submission from rawhide to Fedora 10, and then submit another for Fedora 11? > > No. The %{?dist} tag is a SHOULD item, and comes from the fact that once the > package has been approved and imported in Fedora CVS, you won't be able to > build the package for e.g. Fedora 10 and Fedora 11, since the build system > won't allow you to tag multiple spec files with the same version and release. so does that mean it is only possible to add new packages to rawhide and not to currently supported distributions (f10 & f11) also surely it is the other way around, a single SPEC file (in a single SRPM) for multiple distributions? > > > Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? > > > > I do now, thanks. That has sorted it out. > > Funny, it should have been part of the standard package set for some time now.. I had built a minimal F11 in a VM, and must have unchecked something I shouldn't have (though surely redhat-rpm-config should still have been immutable?). I think I will rebuild the VM using the defined minimum, and not muck about with the kickstart. Then I shall use mock to test the build rather than just the OS in the VM. Thanks for your help so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 08:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 04:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200815.n8K8F2Tt010047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-20 04:15:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Not exactly. The RPMs built on different distributions from the same SRPM will > > be different. But in the review it is generally enough that the package builds > > in the development tree (rawhide). > > That still confuses me - why then have different SRPMS if they contain the same > course and SPEC files? Who said anything about having to have multiple SRPMs? :) When you generate an srpm, the %{?dist} tag in the Release field gets evaluated to the value it has on the distribution. So even though the SRPMs generated on Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 were identical in their content, they still would get different versions. But if you built the Fedora 10 SRPM on Fedora 11, you would get out Fedora 11 RPMs. > > No. The %{?dist} tag is a SHOULD item, and comes from the fact that once the > > package has been approved and imported in Fedora CVS, you won't be able to > > build the package for e.g. Fedora 10 and Fedora 11, since the build system > > won't allow you to tag multiple spec files with the same version and release. > > so does that mean it is only possible to add new packages to rawhide and not to > currently supported distributions (f10 & f11) No. If you don't use the %{?dist} tag, then you can add e.g. the -1 release to F10, the -2 release to F11 and the -3 release to rawhide. With the dist tag, you can have e.g. -3%{?dist} in all of the distros, since they will be evaluated as different (-3.fc10, -3.fc11 and -3.fc12). > also surely it is the other way around, a single SPEC file (in a single SRPM) > for multiple distributions? The whole idea of the %{?dist} tag is to make this possible within the limitations of the build system. Once again: even though the spec file were identical on all of the distributions, the release tag of the RPMs/SRPMs generated from it have different revisions since %{?dist} is evaluted to e.g. fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200922.n8K9Mp1E005545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200920.n8K9KROu005292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-20 05:20:23 EDT --- Sure, it's all good - just wanted to clarify your intentions and think we also did that on irc. Didn't want to end up with a "dead" package here. :) Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint output Please fix: ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: invalid-license BSD3 ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: strange-permission xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz 0777 ghc-xmonad-contrib-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-xmonad-contrib library. (need a line break) Waived: ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/xmonad-contrib-0.8.1/libHSxmonad-contrib-0.8.1_p.a [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [=] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. See above rpmlint [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 03f74fda270aca759407787da73e50d9 xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Please fix the 3 rpmlint issues before importing to CVS. Package is APPROVED by petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200926.n8K9Q83v023206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-20 05:26:07 EDT --- For reference here is the cabal2spec-diff output (on my copy of a fixed spec file) --- ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec 2009-09-20 19:01:57.000000000 +1000 +++ ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec.cabal2spec 2009-09-20 19:16:54.000000000 +1000 @@ -8,58 +8,35 @@ Name: ghc-%{pkg_name} Version: 0.8.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} -Summary: Third party extensions for xmonad +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library Group: Development/Libraries -License: BSD +License: @LICENSE@ URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/%{pkg_name} Source0: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/%{pkg_name}/%{version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # fedora ghc archs: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-devel = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-devel BuildRequires: ghc, ghc-rpm-macros %if %{with doc} BuildRequires: ghc-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-doc %endif %if %{with prof} BuildRequires: ghc-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-prof = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-prof %endif %description -Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc-%{ghc_version}. - -Third party tiling algorithms, configurations and scripts to xmonad, -a tiling window manager for X. - -For an introduction to building, configuring and using xmonad -extensions, see "XMonad.Doc". In particular: +This package provides the Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc. -"XMonad.Doc.Configuring", a guide to configuring xmonad - -"XMonad.Doc.Extending", using the contributed extensions library - -"XMonad.Doc.Developing", introduction to xmonad internals and writing -your own extensions. %package devel Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library Group: Development/Libraries +Provides: ghc-%{pkg_name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-devel -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-devel %description devel This package contains the development files for %{name} @@ -73,13 +50,9 @@ Requires: ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-doc -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-doc %description doc -This package contains development documentation files for -the %{name} library. +This package contains development documentation files for the %{name} library. %endif @@ -89,9 +62,6 @@ Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc-prof = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-prof -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-prof [BTW I plan to reverse the diff output in the next cabal2spec since that makes more sense now.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200933.n8K9X4Df007272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-20 05:33:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Then maybe you'd be willing to perform the review? Done. Since I'm not a sponsor you still need to seek one. Maybe you should review other packages too. Did you create other packages? You could even send a mail to fedora-devel describing your package and what you have done etc. The more you tell about you and your package the earlier you will find a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200929.n8K9TkJw006605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 --- Comment #11 from Dylan Swift 2009-09-20 05:29:45 EDT --- > > That still confuses me - why then have different SRPMS if they contain the > same > > course and SPEC files? > > Who said anything about having to have multiple SRPMs? :) > When you generate an srpm, the %{?dist} tag in the Release field gets > evaluated > to the value it has on the distribution. So even though the SRPMs generated on > Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 were identical in their content, they still would get > different versions. when I run rpmbuild -ba I get an SRPM file with the %{?dist} tag in the filename. So when I run on my f10 machine I get one file, when I run on my f11 machine I get another. > But if you built the Fedora 10 SRPM on Fedora 11, you would get out Fedora 11 > RPMs. Understood > > > No. The %{?dist} tag is a SHOULD item, and comes from the fact that once > the > > > package has been approved and imported in Fedora CVS, you won't be able to > > > build the package for e.g. Fedora 10 and Fedora 11, since the build system > > > won't allow you to tag multiple spec files with the same version and > release. > > > > so does that mean it is only possible to add new packages to rawhide and > not to > > currently supported distributions (f10 & f11) > > No. If you don't use the %{?dist} tag, then you can add e.g. the -1 release to > F10, the -2 release to F11 and the -3 release to rawhide. With the dist tag, > you can have e.g. -3%{?dist} in all of the distros, since they will be > evaluated as different (-3.fc10, -3.fc11 and -3.fc12). > > > also surely it is the other way around, a single SPEC file (in a single > SRPM) > > for multiple distributions? > > The whole idea of the %{?dist} tag is to make this possible within the > limitations of the build system. Once again: even though the spec file were > identical on all of the distributions, the release tag of the RPMs/SRPMs > generated from it have different revisions since %{?dist} is evaluted to e.g. > fc11. but if the %{?dist} tag is irrelevant to the binary (the system building the binary determines that) then why have the %{?dist} tag in the SRPM? Ultimately what I need to know is what do I upload nmon-12d-1-f10.srpm or nmon-12d-1-f11.srpm or does it not matter? I haven't attempted to build on f12 yet - I don't have a copy of the latest. Should I be worried about that? thanks again for your help on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200945.n8K9jNVo026465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-20 05:45:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Then maybe you'd be willing to perform the review? > > Done. Since I'm not a sponsor you still need to seek one. Maybe you should > review other packages too. Did you create other packages? You could even send a > mail to fedora-devel describing your package and what you have done etc. > > The more you tell about you and your package the earlier you will find a > sponsor. Is this a joke? :D I'm a sponsor myself, with 136 reviews. Most of the review bugs are by people who have been sponsored long ago and have packaging rights. Only the ones marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR need sponsors to (formally) review them. I see you have acquired sponsoree status just five days ago, and you clearly have not understood yet completely how the package review process works. ** You really should go through the review checklist in the review bug (here). It's not just for me or you, it's also for other people who look at the reviews. A simple "Looks OK" is sloppy reviewing, since it's very likely you have forgot to check something. And it doesn't tell other people that you have really went through everything. Learn to walk before you run, OK? :) PS. Setting fedora-review to + is not enough, since anyone can remove or write over the flag. When you a package passes the review, write APPROVED in the comment field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201100.n8KB0BG8005863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew | |.edu) --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-20 07:00:10 EDT --- for approval, please write better summary in spec file please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#summary *license ok *rpmlint ok *perl specific guidelines ok *source ok after better summary is provided, could be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201102.n8KB22dB006173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #21 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-20 07:02:00 EDT --- Hi David, any progress on packaging dependencies? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201105.n8KB5Vkn022112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-20 07:05:27 EDT --- Hi Pavel, Please request CVS and submit build into bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201111.n8KBBTcA023091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-20 07:11:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I see you have acquired sponsoree status just five days ago, and you clearly > have not understood yet completely how the package review process works. Quite right. The Fedora bureaucracy is still new to me. But hey weren't we all once small? Calm down big boy. > You really should go through the review checklist in the review bug (here). > It's not just for me or you, it's also for other people who look at the > reviews. A simple "Looks OK" is sloppy reviewing, since it's very likely you > have forgot to check something. And it doesn't tell other people that you have > really went through everything. Like I already said in comment #5. I went through _all_ must (and should) items of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. And I did all steps of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process which does not state that a comment like "APPROVED" should be written. > Learn to walk before you run, OK? :) Learning by doing. A wise man said this once before :) > PS. Setting fedora-review to + is not enough, since anyone can remove or write > over the flag. When you a package passes the review, write APPROVED in the > comment field. At least this one is a constructive comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524451] New: Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524451 Summary: Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://puppetmanaged.org/releases/puppet-module-yum-development.spec SRPM URL: http://puppetmanaged.org/repos/f12/SRPMS/puppet-module-yum-development-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: Puppet module for managing yum (this is the development branch) The "-development" part is necessary for the user to maintain the ability to stage environments. I'm not exactly sure whether this is the best way to do it, but with a "-testing" and "-production" version of this package, a user would be able to configure the following in /etc/puppet/puppet.conf: [puppetmasterd] (...snip...) environments = production,testing,development (...snip...) [development] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/development: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/development [testing] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/testing: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/testing [production] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/production: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/production One could argue that the released version is independent from the different staging environments a user is running, in which case we could drop the "-development" part of the package, and go with something similar to: [puppetmasterd] (...snip...) environments = production,testing,development (...snip...) [development] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/development: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/ [testing] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/testing: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/ [production] modulepath = /var/lib/puppet/modules/production: \ /var/lib/puppet/puppetmanaged.org/modules/ == About puppetmanaged.org == puppetmanaged.org provides one singular type of modules (more information about different types of puppet modules at http://puppetmanaged.org/?q=node/2) suitable for Enterprise Linux as well as Fedora. This module (the Yum module) is the first in a series of puppet modules that would be submitted for inclusion in Fedora and EPEL. For a complete list of modules, see http://git.puppetmanaged.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201136.n8KBanks027231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 11:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201140.n8KBekxN028068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 07:40:45 EDT --- Hello Kashyap, just add BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) to let rpmlint warning go away You dont need to mkdir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} as %doc takes care of that. The package is in good shape beyond said things and I'll complete the review after you applied changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 12:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201204.n8KC4is8016732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 Pierre Dorbais changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pierre.dorbais at free.fr Platform|i386 |All Version|10 |rawhide Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Pierre Dorbais 2009-09-20 08:04:43 EDT --- That's my first package and I've no sponsor. rpmlint: chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SPECS/ciso.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SRPMS/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 12:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201213.n8KCDbvc001637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 08:13:36 EDT --- I cannot find your packager group account, do you need a sponsor? In that case please add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag (and sorry i can still review your package but cannot sponsor you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 12:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201229.n8KCTj1V004313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 kashyap chamarthy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-20 08:29:45 EDT --- Thanks Guido for reviewing, I made the changes as per comment #2 updated SPEC and SRPM: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace.spec http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace-1.4.2-2.fc12.src.rpm And yes, I need a sponsor. I'd really appreciate it, if somebody is willing to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 12:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201229.n8KCTq8d004354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 08:29:51 EDT --- Please include the COPYING and AUTHORS file in %doc; you also have a little typo in the latest changelog entry. I will post the complete review after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 12:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201257.n8KCveY8026036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 08:57:39 EDT --- Please forgive comment above, my bad... here's the review. OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5: 513df206613cbd061b6d49cdbfe927ef OK - MUST: The package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1692796 OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package must own all directories that it creates OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK - SHOULD: uses opt_flags and smp_mflags Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 13:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201322.n8KDMXU7030278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 09:22:32 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is GPLv2) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1692846 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 01fe19fb9709b30a7a154e528a74d1e3 intrace-1.4.2.tgz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release Package APPROVED, but blocked by FE_NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 13:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201357.n8KDvJqh003592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-20 09:57:18 EDT --- > Calm down big boy. I second that. > > A simple "Looks OK" is sloppy reviewing, Not at all. This point is entirely moot. Whether it's a very brief "Looks OK" or "APPROVED" or a huge list of MUST/SHOULD/OK/NOTOK/FAIL/BLAH items that copies the entire ReviewGuidelines Wiki page, it doesn't matter. All that matters is whether a reviewer has checked the package actually. The reviewer takes responsibility for serious mistakes. But don't forget that there are two people. The packager is the second one, who ought to review the package, too. ;) > # Don't start the firewall automatically > sed -i -e 's,# chkconfig: 2345 99 92,# chkconfig: - 20 80,' firehol.sh That's sloppy. sed -i is worse than a clean patch file. If the source file changes, your sed transformation no longer applies. Silently. On the contrary, a patch would fail and terminate the build. Adding a guard after the sed transformation is highly recommended. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 14:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201421.n8KELeQN007749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |stefan at seekline.net --- Comment #11 from Till Maas 2009-09-20 10:21:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. And I did all > steps of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process which does not > state that a comment like "APPROVED" should be written. It might be not emphasized enough, but you also need to assign the bug to you (the Assigned To field). I just did this for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 15:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201505.n8KF5EKv030422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-20 11:05:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > # Don't start the firewall automatically > > sed -i -e 's,# chkconfig: 2345 99 92,# chkconfig: - 20 80,' firehol.sh > > That's sloppy. sed -i is worse than a clean patch file. If the source file > changes, your sed transformation no longer applies. Silently. On the contrary, > a patch would fail and terminate the build. Adding a guard after the sed > transformation is highly recommended. True, didn't come to think of that when I packaged this a year ago when I was a newcomer in Fedora. (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines. And I did all > > steps of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process which does not > > state that a comment like "APPROVED" should be written. > > It might be not emphasized enough, but you also need to assign the bug to you > (the Assigned To field). I just did this for you. ... and change the status to ASSIGNED, which I just did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 15:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/gstreamer-plugins-espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package would especially help some Sugar Activities audio-wise. However, it currently doesn't compile on ppc and ppc64. A failed koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693057 The ExcludeArch tags have been added after this build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 16:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201601.n8KG1XDo006978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-09-20 12:01:32 EDT --- I just double-checked this. #432265 seems to provide an explanation for the conflicts. Rex, would this be enough to justify a conflict? Mel, maybe using this URL would already work out: https://fedorahosted.org/education/browser/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html Except from the smaller issues noted by Bj?rn (which should be pretty easy to fix), it does look rather good to me. However, I'll need to leave this up to Rex or others, as I'm not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 16:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201621.n8KGLcMP010358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508126 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 16:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201621.n8KGLbW2010328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Depends on| |432265 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 12:21:36 EDT --- ok, the precendent has been set, I'm ok with allowing this then (though I'd prefer an explicit Conflicts: fedora-bookmarks then. I'll continue with a formal review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 16:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201624.n8KGOLiQ010618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mel at redhat.com) --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 12:24:20 EDT --- Hrm, the original spec/srpm links get "404 Not Found" now, please provide current URLs, and we can proceed with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 18:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:05:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201805.n8KI5iC2012810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-20 14:05:43 EDT --- Have you tried building without -Werror ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 18:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201807.n8KI7poY013167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #3 from Klaus Grue 2009-09-20 14:07:50 EDT --- Thanks to Fabian Affolter for comment #1. I have updated the package accordingly. The new version is here: Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.3/download/logiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.3/download/logiweb-0.2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.2/0.2.3/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/0.2/0.2.3/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/0.2/0.2.3/download/rpm.html > Please reread ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines ... Thanks for the pointer. That version is clearer than any version I have read. It took a while to do everything stated in the guidelines. I hope I did it right. I was in doubt whether or not the build system transferred %{optflags} to CFLAGS automatically. So in %build I wrote make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" I hope that is the right way to do it. Section 1.4 of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines says: > No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries > ... > Exceptions > * Some software (usually related to compilers or cross-compiler > environments) cannot be built without the use of a previous > toolchain or development environment (open source). If you have > a package which meets this criteria, contact the Fedora Packaging > Committee for approval. The exception above exactly fits the logiweb package. The logiweb package contains a file named src/pages.c which is a binary file sent through 'xxd -i'. The binary file is the lgc-compiler compiled by the lgc-compiler. The 'previous toolchain' is Logiweb version 0.1 which is implemented in clisp. Shall I contact the Fedora Packaging Committee at this point or is that too early? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 18:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201829.n8KIT1Sa031554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520954 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 18:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201841.n8KIfTlC001518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 14:41:28 EDT --- Looks very simple packaging-wise, not sure how (best) to test functionality though (or maybe doing so against kdeedu/parley can work). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 18:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201842.n8KIgpRN018842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 14:42:50 EDT --- I see only 2 problems 1. MUST: include README.txt, it includes licensing text 2. MUST: omit simplejson from packaging address those, and looks like we have a winner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 19:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201901.n8KJ1NGV004999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-20 15:01:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361832) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361832) gdb log when gmixvm consumes much CPU (and hangs) For 1.2.4-2: * License - As info files and files under doc/ are under GFDL, the license tag should be "GPLv3+ and GFDL". * %description - You don't have to duplicate the same %description into -doc subpackage. * Conditional BR (BuildRequires) - INSTALL file says: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 140 - User Option: -with-readline[=yes|no] 141 - User Option: -without-readline 142 Enables/disables the GNU Readline support for `mixvm'. If the 143 required libraries are missing (*note Requirements::) the configure 144 script with automatically disable this feature. ----------------------------------------------------------------- From configure.in, to enable readline support both "ncurses-devel" and "readline-devel" is needed for BR. Currently build.log says: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 194 checking for initscr in -lncurses... no 195 configure: WARNING: Cannot find ncurses lib ----------------------------------------------------------------- Would you enable this option? * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. If parallel make fails, please write a note about that on the spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * About mdk.desktop - The category "Application;" is deprecated and should be removed. - The Category line should end with semicolon, i.e. with "...Emulator;GTK;" . * Timestamps - Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------ to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent autotools. ! By the way, about gmixvm - On rawhide, when I try gmixvm it consumes almost 100% CPU and it becomes no responsive. gdb log attached when gmixvm hangs. Would you contact upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 19:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201921.n8KJLr99026292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-09-20 15:21:51 EDT --- I am sorry and I've should have done this straight away; Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rekonq New Branches: F-10 Owners: kaboon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 19:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201934.n8KJYiDB011145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 15:34:43 EDT --- In addition, seems to me that we can use noarch/python_sitelib here instead of making it arch'd + python_sitearch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 19:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909201956.n8KJu7xL015235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-09-20 15:56:05 EDT --- Silas, are you ready to take this to the next level? It's been a while of course, but I'd like to see this package end up in Fedora / EPEL as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 20:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 16:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202009.n8KK9qKF017345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-20 16:09:51 EDT --- spec/srpm with suggested fixes, tested to work with kdeedu/parley, http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-mwclient/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 21:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202150.n8KLo0Bq026517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #66 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-20 17:49:57 EDT --- Thanks spot! So what would be the license of the javaviewers subpackage then? In any case, I believe that the classes/ssl/src/tight/README classes/ssl/src/ultra/README files need to be added to the %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 21:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202155.n8KLtZuZ028791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-09-20 17:55:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'll correct the repack instructions in the next update. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: canorus Short Description: Music Score Editor Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 22:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202216.n8KMGoC8004134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #67 from Christian Krause 2009-09-20 18:16:47 EDT --- I've looked at the newest package (and especially at the new subpackage) and unfortunately there are some new issues: TODO: The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by the javaviewers subpackage. Using %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/classes should fix it. TODO: The subpackage should require the fully-versioned main package: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} TODO: Regarding the BR for the build of the java parts please follow these guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires It may be debatable whether the "Requires:" are need, but since the java clients may also be executed outside of the browser, it would be OK to use them. TODO: There are some minor wording/spelling mistakes in the description of the javaviewers sub-package. I suggest the following: Summary: VNC clients (java applets) Description: The package contains the corresponding java clients for %{name}. They can be used with any java-enabled browser and provide an easy access to the server without the need to install software on the client machine. TODO: Man pages should not be marked as %doc. (sorry, I've overseen this in the first review) TODO: Please use consistently: %defattr(-,root,root,-) TODO: In general the java packaging guidelines encourage the packagers to build the GCJ AOT bits: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines I've had a quick look and it looks like that it is possible to activate it. TODO: Please add the files mentioned by Orcan in #66 to the subpackage as well. MINOR: please replace "ln -s" by %%{__ln_s} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 22:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202247.n8KMltwb028742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #9 from Christian Krause 2009-09-20 18:47:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Unfortunately clutter-gtk is not yet released yet: > > http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/clutter-gtk/0.10/ . I'll try to keep > > this in mind and create a bug entry for clutter-gtk once 0.10.3 is released. > > > How about packaging a pre-release snapshot? As long as we know for certain -- > or reasonably so -- that the final version will come out before we freeze for > final, that's probably good enough. I've checked the clutter-gtk's git-repository and it looks like that there was not much activity in the last week: http://git.clutter-project.org/cgit.cgi?url=clutter-gtk/log/ Since the final freeze for F12 is on 9/29 I believe it would be too risky. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 23:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909202328.n8KNSGOL009129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-20 19:28:15 EDT --- Thanks for the catch, Jason. I've updated the Specfile and .src.rpm to include the extra build dependency that you recommended, and the package now passes t/99-pod.t as well: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1693616&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 02:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210240.n8L2esu8031328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Ed Brand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) | --- Comment #48 from Ed Brand 2009-09-20 22:40:51 EDT --- Ok, Following the steps on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess I imported into CVS, and ran make build for EL-5, FC-10&11 branches. [ebrand at f12 F-10]$ make build /usr/bin/koji build dist-f10-updates-candidate 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/sslogger/F-10#sslogger-0_9-50_fc10' ... Question) In order to request the package be added to EL-5, F-10&11 I need to submit a bodhi request - make update? -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 03:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210338.n8L3cU76026517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Alex Musolino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-20 23:38:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: picprog Short Description: Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software Owners: musolinoa Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 03:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210359.n8L3xrr6015125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mel at redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Mel Chua 2009-09-20 23:59:51 EDT --- My apologies; I restructured my fedorapeople.org space a bit. The files are at http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/education-bookmarks/ now. I'm out for training most of this week but should be able to address any comments (including Bjorn's) this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 06:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] New: Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Summary: Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snacc.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snacc-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Snacc is a dample Neufeld ASN.1 to C compiler that can produce C, C++ routines or type tables for BER encoding, decoding, printing and freeing. Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693956 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693961 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 07:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210730.n8L7U2Xn020060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 Nigel Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Nigel Jones 2009-09-21 03:30:00 EDT --- Hi Miroslav, Everything looks good now, I'm going to give this the big fedora?review+ and approve the package. While nothing is blocking you at this stage from requesting CVS/Submitting a Build I will mention that because of the dependencies between SRPMs that you may want to wait before building until they are approved so you don't get broken dependency e-mails everywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 07:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210741.n8L7f7go005364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-21 03:41:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rhn-client-tools Short Description: Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 07:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210756.n8L7ucZn008815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] New: Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon Alias: rhnsd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Summary: Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnsd/rhnsd.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnsd/rhnsd-4.5.12-1.src.rpm Description: The Red Hat Update Agent that automatically queries the Red Hat Network servers and determines which packages need to be updated on your machine, and runs any actions. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1365447 rpmlint gives: rhnsd.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rhnsd But this should be ok, since it purpose of this daemon to be enabled by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 08:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210814.n8L8EjgW013391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-21 04:14:44 EDT --- Correct link to scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1694027 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 09:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909210914.n8L9E0FV013593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-21 05:13:59 EDT --- Hi Lon, let's start with the basic stuff from the checklist: rpmlint SPECS/* SRPMS/* RPM*/*/* fence-virt-compat.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virt-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/fence_xvm fence_virt fence-virtd.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-checkpoint.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-libvirt.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-multicast.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The dangling-relative-symlink is OK, we will need to coordinate fence_xvm deprecation from fence-agents package, but be aware that while we go through the process, we will need a Conflicts (even if undesired), and later fence-agents will require fence-virt-compat (a two stage commit). For the documentation, read my comments below about the spec file. MUST: * The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: OK * The spec file name must match the base package: OK * The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines: see below details. * The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license: OK (GPLv2+) * The License field in the package spec file must match the actual licens: OK * If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc: this needs to be done for each subpackage (and it will also kill all the no-documentation warnings). * The spec file must be written in American English: OK * The spec file for the package MUST be legible: OK * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: OK * The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: OK * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: NOT OK. The package is missing some BuildRequires (nss and xml2 at least) * The spec file MUST handle locales properly: does not apply * Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files: does not apply * Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries: OK * A package must own all directories that it creates: NOT OK. %{_libdir}/%{name}/ is not owned by the package or subpackages * A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings: OK * Permissions on files must be set properly: OK * Each package must have a %clean section: OK * Each package must consistently use macros: OK * The package must contain code, or permissable conten: OK * Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage: does not apply * If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application: OK * Header files must be in a -devel package: does not apply. * Static libraries must be in a -static package: does not apply. * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig': does not apply. * If a package contains library files with a suffix...: does not apply. * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must...: does not apply. * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives: OK * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file: does not apply * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages: OK * At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf: OK * All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8: OK SHOULD: * If the source package does not include license text: OK. upstream ships licence file. * The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations: does not apply * The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock: NOK (missing BuildRequires) * The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures: (same as above) * The reviewer should test that the package functions as described: OK * If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be san: does not apply * Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package: At a first glance it looks ok with the exception of: fence-virtd-multicast Requires: %{name}-host = but there is no -host package? * The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase..: does not apply * If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, ..: OK. A few notes on the spec file: * URL should be in the form of: http://fence-virt.git.sourceforge.net/fence-virt/fence-virt/fence-virt-%{version}.tar.gz to include the file name to download. * the format %{buildroot} is preferred over $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * %install section can be simpler. The whole installation of docs is redundant. in the %files section use: %doc COPYING TODO README and you will achieve the same result. The macro %doc looks for files in the unpacked source tree and copy them to the correct %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ for you. this will also allow you to copy COPYING and README into subpackages easily. * the %configure macro is best expressed as %{configure} for consistency. Both works. Please fix the few remaining issues. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 10:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211020.n8LAK7Hs009054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-21 06:20:06 EDT --- Updated to require the voms version fixed for bug 523972 Spec: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec SRPM: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-2.fc11.src.rpm A koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1694311 $ rpmlint SPECS/myproxy.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/myproxy-4.8-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/myproxy-* myproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy myproxy-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/myproxy 0700 myproxy-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/myproxy-server $prog These are all justified in particular /var/lib/myproxy should not be readable by anyone other than the myproxy user. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 11:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211154.n8LBsmbb017277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 LukasHetzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(a.badger at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #23 from LukasHetzi 2009-09-21 07:54:44 EDT --- Any news concerning the license for lightboxXL.js? Should I fix the other problems first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211212.n8LCCF6M021057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #2 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-21 08:12:14 EDT --- Thanks for answering my request. I didn't know I could get away with not compiling the tests/examples. I patched the configure/Makefiles to not compile them and got rid of all the rpmlint warnings/errors. Here are the new files: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4.spec http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/telepathy-qt4/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for volunteering to sponsor me! I thought I had already found a sponsor, but it seems he's too busy now. It would be great if you could sponsor me. I have a few more packages you can look at. More info here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211235.n8LCZSwj006015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-21 08:35:27 EDT --- Okay, this looks fine on the first glance. Let's work through the MUST and the SHOULD lists. --- NOK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. I get a different output: $ rpmlint {SPECS,RPMS/i586,SRPMS}/rhnsd* rhnsd.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rhnsd rhnsd.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/rhnsd rhnsd-debuginfo.i586: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I agree that rhnsd should be enabled by default and that therefore the warning can be ignored. The error must be fixed, tho. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. NOK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. `make` is missing: %{?_smp_mflags} CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. NOK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. AFAICS you state 'GPLv2' in the spec file while the rhnsd.c reads 'GPL'. N/A MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Personally, I'd see that everything abov of %description is aligned (e.g. the pkg names in the requires section). OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. 8ead968af7384d2a5e822baa8ec4e2b6 rhnsd-4.5.12.tar.gz OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. F11 i586 N/A MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. --- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please do so and add the LICENSE file to %doc. Not necessary for approval, tho. SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. fedora-11-i386 epel-5-i386 SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. --- Please fix the above mentioned issues and upload the new pkg/spec files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211248.n8LCmXEC008981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #42 from Till Maas 2009-09-21 08:48:29 EDT --- %makeinstall should not be used, is it really needed here? Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used Source0: does not work here (404): http://downloads.sourceforge.net/navit/navit-2578.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211250.n8LCoFqb009627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-21 08:50:14 EDT --- Sorry, forgot to include this above. $ rpmlint -I debuginfo-without-sources debuginfo-without-sources: This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520621] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Scripts to spin down hard drive and save power In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211249.n8LCnZBL029977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520621 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #361704|text/x-rpm-spec |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211253.n8LCr9ia010453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 08:53:07 EDT --- Just a couple of quick notes: - the license tag must be GPLv2+ - adapt the URL field according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - you can drop python-setuptools and pygtk2-devel from BuildRequires - for better legibility, add a blank line between the changelog revisions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 12:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 08:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211257.n8LCvSMD011843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-21 08:57:23 EDT --- I have set '?' on your behalf. Not sure everything is still alright for cvs work. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 13:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] New: Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 Summary: Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwickert at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtrayicon.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gtrayicon-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Gtrayicon is a generic tray icon for GNOME. It defines two actions: activate and deactivate, that are alternated by clicking in the tray icon. You choose what commands to run on each action. You can also define each action's icon and a custom menu that is shown on left click. A sample menu file is included with the package. Check /usr/share/doc/gtrayicon-1.1/sample.menu for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 13:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211328.n8LDS3Dk008133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 09:28:02 EDT --- You should also replace the shebang #!/usr/bin/env python with #!/usr/bin/python (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_%28draft%29), e.g. by adding sed -i 's|^#!/usr/bin/env python|#!/usr/bin/python|' gscribble to the %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211404.n8LE4MCP030083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-09-21 10:04:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Summary: > Move libraries to -devel package Hm... > Fix exit call in library I think this warning can be ignored - it's not a classic library and the exit seems to be desired. > Check CPL license CPL is fine. > Fix URL and SOURCE tags Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211409.n8LE96N8021865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 10:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ultimately what I need to know is what do I upload nmon-12d-1-f10.srpm or > nmon-12d-1-f11.srpm or does it not matter? You can use either of them. To put it simply, it's not the filename that matters here but the contents of the file. > I haven't attempted to build on f12 yet - I don't have a copy of the latest. > Should I be worried about that? No, you don't need to worry about that and you don't need to install several Fedora releases either. With the koji build system it's possible to create scratch builds for various targets and Fedora versions. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji#Scratch_builds_2 for instance. You can also use mock to build rpms for different Fedora/EPEL releases on your current system. Install mock, then use ls /etc/mock to get a list of available, pre-configured targets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211411.n8LEBAp2032277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 --- Comment #4 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-09-21 10:11:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is where those CMPI packaging guidelines would really help. In > particular, all these CMPI plugins belong not in %{_libdir} but in > %{_libdir}/cmpi/ where they can't interfere with the rest of the system's > library search path. This is a problem in several of the CMPI packages being > reviewed this week. [vcrhonek at norcus SPECS]$ rpm -qlp ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3-1.0.14-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ... /usr/lib64/cmpi/libLinux_NFSv3SettingContext.so /usr/lib64/cmpi/libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfiguration.so /usr/lib64/cmpi/libLinux_NFSv3SystemSetting.so /usr/lib64/libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so ... Matt, the 'libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so' should be in %{_libdir}/cmpi/ too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211421.n8LELgx7026700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc at redhat.com --- Comment #14 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-09-21 10:21:40 EDT --- Can we get virtmaint added to cvs commit and bugzilla cc ? Thanks Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: virt-v2v InitialCC: virtmaint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211452.n8LEqKIL013689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #4 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-21 10:52:19 EDT --- fence-virt-0.1-2 spec file, based on Fabio's comments: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt.spec Updated Source RPM: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462530] Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211458.n8LEw9nf005105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462530 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-09-21 10:58:06 EDT --- John, if you still want to submit this package to Fedora, please respond within the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211500.n8LF0fqe006025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #43 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-21 11:00:39 EDT --- it's probably just a hangover from the MDV package, I'll check whether it's needed. Source0 is expected not to work, this is an SVN snapshot build. The SVN location is listed in a comment near the top of the spec. Guess I could add the tarball creation command too. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211500.n8LF0wW3006081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sm at sandro-mathys. | |ch) --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-09-21 11:00:56 EDT --- Sandro, if you still want to submit this package to Fedora, please respond within the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 14:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211459.n8LExpFW005437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-09-21 10:59:48 EDT --- John, if you still want to submit this package to Fedora, please respond within the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211506.n8LF6bpj007472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sm at sandro-mathys. | |ch) | --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-21 11:06:36 EDT --- Jerry, sorry for not working on this for such a long time. I actually started to fetch up with review request today and will try to bring up a new version of xml-writer tomorrow (CEST). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211508.n8LF8tOv017565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sm at sandro-mathys.ch --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-21 11:08:54 EDT --- no review, just some remarks: - I'm sure you can do better with all the %description - make is missing build-flags - use %global instead of %define: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211512.n8LFCn4V008967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211509.n8LF93FJ007866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt --- Comment #3 from Jos? Matos 2009-09-21 11:09:01 EDT --- Yes, I have been busy. :-( Classes have just started and I am still playing catchup. :-) And I would not mind if Michel Salim sponsors you, after all this is not a popularity contest. ;-) Ionu? please note that in order to be sponsored your reviews should be more verbose instead of simply saying that they follow the guidelines. There are several examples in other review that I can give as example. For a first time packager it is important to show that you know the issues that are being dealt when building a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211517.n8LFHNRD019705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmccann at redhat.com --- Comment #51 from William Jon McCann 2009-09-21 11:17:18 EDT --- Has there been any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211528.n8LFSnFV012916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-21 11:28:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xml-writer.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xml-writer-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Okay, I lied. I had some spare minutes und just did it :) Fixed everything you mentioned above. Thanks for the review so far! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211530.n8LFUG73022807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #44 from Till Maas 2009-09-21 11:30:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > Source0 is expected not to work, this is an SVN snapshot build. The SVN > location is listed in a comment near the top of the spec. Guess I could add the > tarball creation command too. Yes, this is also required by the guidelines. Because this comment was missing, I expected the svn snapshot to be created by upstream. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211540.n8LFeXKj025249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Bug 480855 depends on bug 480851, which changed state. Bug 480851 Summary: Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-21 11:40:29 EDT --- mh, okay, just an installation of a script, you removed the parts which causes issues. the parts that survived are okay, (see above).. ========== APPROVED ========== Fabian, sorry for my late response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 15:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211544.n8LFicHd026282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #68 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-21 11:44:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > Thanks spot! So what would be the license of the javaviewers subpackage then? GPLv2+ The license you pointed out is an MIT variant, I've added it to the MIT list as the "Nuclear" variant. :) MIT + GPLv2+ = GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211603.n8LG3s1X021588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #9 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-09-21 12:03:52 EDT --- Rex, have incorporated your changes in my spec, builds fine. ready to go -- Steven M. Parrish - KDE Triage Master - PackageKit Triager Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211605.n8LG5Xt6032250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-21 12:05:32 EDT --- ok then. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211607.n8LG7JFI000369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #10 from Steve Milner 2009-09-21 12:07:18 EDT --- a674c6c495ad24411bd2f809d300b23c2e3ead84 ncrack-0.01-0.4.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm 943102e58844847163cd5c574d555fcde316d906 ncrack.spec Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-0.4.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211611.n8LGBvPb001646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211611.n8LGBYii001567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #11 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-09-21 12:11:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-mwclient Short Description: Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API Owners: tuxbrewr Branches: F10, F11 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211644.n8LGiPnR008492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(a.badger at gmail.co |needinfo? |m) | --- Comment #24 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-09-21 12:44:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Any news concerning the license for lightboxXL.js? David, Eric, J5, did any of you hear anything back about this? IIRC -- the first option was lighthbox relicense and the analysis here was that would probably not happen. David, I know you sent off an email; did you hear back? The second option was that upstream would replace lightbox. Eric did you hear back on that? The third option was that we'd coordinate with upstream on what a valid replacement library would be and perform the port. J5, how is that going? > Should I fix the other problems first? >From a package review standpoint, yes. If no one(here or upstream) is working on the licensing issue, we aren't going to get this package in, though :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211652.n8LGq48u000418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #49 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 12:52:01 EDT --- Well, - Please rebuild also for F-11 - For F-10/11/EL-5, please submit push requests on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 17:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211700.n8LH0fN8012086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 13:00:39 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 16:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211656.n8LGuVOL011150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 12:56:30 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 17:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211704.n8LH44Vv003688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 13:04:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I've committed, tagged, and built this for devel, F-12, F-11, and EL-5. > I've bodhi updated it for all branches except F-12, which is frozen right now. Currently you don't have to submit push requests on bodhi, F-12 build already appears on "rawhide" (currently "rawhide" is F-12, F-13). Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 17:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211743.n8LHhC2B012744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 13:43:12 EDT --- I meant currently rawhide is F-12, not F-13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 17:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211750.n8LHo3ph014342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 13:50:01 EDT --- Changes look fine -- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211802.n8LI2oJ0026720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-21 14:02:49 EDT --- OK, One last suggestion would be to switch to License: GFDL to match what fedora-bookmarks and astronomy-bookmarks use. But otherwise, this is fairly simple packaging-wise, I'll leave that to you to decide how best to handle the licensing Please also address the issues raised in comment #2, regarding Source0 URL (either provide full URL, or add a comment explaining why one isn't provided). Fix those, and I think we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211806.n8LI6ML6018406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-21 14:06:21 EDT --- Meh, I won't consider those 2 blockers, but please clarify or address them before building. thanks. (apply for access to packager group in FAS, let me know your fas username) and as your sponsor, please list me as CC: on the cvsadmin request. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211813.n8LIDASX029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 14:13:05 EDT --- Some notes for 3.05-2: * Source - SOURCE0 included in your srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written in SOURCE0: ----------------------------------------------------------- 198755 2008-04-06 03:40 mysqltcl-3.05.tar.gz 198617 2008-09-24 08:54 tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-2.fc9.src/mysqltcl-3.05.tar.gz ----------------------------------------------------------- * License - Actually this is "MIT", not "BSD". * Version specific BuildRequires - I don't think there is any sense to write tcl-devel version dependency (i.e. >= 8.3.1) where tcl abi dependency is also specified. * Cflags ----------------------------------------------------------- 139 gcc -pipe -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"mysqltcl\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"mysqltcl\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"3.05\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"mysqltcl\ 3.05\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=1 -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 -DTCL_THREADS=1 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE=1 -DTCL_WIDE_INT_TYPE=long\ long -DHAVE_STRUCT_STAT64=1 -DHAVE_OPEN64=1 -DHAVE_LSEEK64=1 -DHAVE_TYPE_OFF64_T=1 -DUSE_TCL_STUBS=1 -I"/usr/include" -I/usr/include/mysql -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wno-implicit-int -fPIC -c `echo ./generic/mysqltcl.c` -o mysqltcl.o ----------------------------------------------------------- - "-fomit-frame-pointer" makes debugging very difficult and is not allowed on Fedora. * %defattr ----------------------------------------------------------- %defattr (0644,root,root,0755) %doc README ChangeLog COPYING AUTHORS README-msqltcl doc/mysqltcl.html ----------------------------------------------------------- - Well, I would recommend to change the permissions of these files at %prep explicitly rather than to use this %defattr hack. ----------------------------------------------------------- %defattr (-,root,root) ----------------------------------------------------------- - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211814.n8LIE2ZX020767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 14:14:00 EDT --- *** Bug 491815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491815] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for TCL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211814.n8LIE1D8020715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 14:14:00 EDT --- Once closing. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466047 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211821.n8LILKIj022666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 14:21:19 EDT --- One more notes * tests/ directory - This package contains tests/ directory. If some test program exists, please create %check stage and execute the test program there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211842.n8LIgSC4027453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211844.n8LIiKUY004714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #22 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-21 14:44:17 EDT --- Here's a build based on the 0.6pre, the code is still changing rapidly, but a release is due "soon": Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-1.20090920svn2334.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211842.n8LIgFef004492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dennis at ausil.us |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dennis at ausil.us) | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-21 14:42:13 EDT --- Revoking the assignee, reassigning to myself. Well, I don't know how to use this package, however, packaging itself seems very simple. Some notes: * Source0 - Would you explain why commented out the full URL of Source0? I tried to access the URL and it seems valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211848.n8LImN97005655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-21 14:48:20 EDT --- Hi, Jan Klepek, sorry for delay New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xls2csv Short Description: A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211847.n8LIlhY0005569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in |fedora-cvs? |fo) | --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-21 14:47:40 EDT --- Hi, Jan Klepek, sorry for delay New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Short Description: Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211846.n8LIkTcr005399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 14:46:28 EDT --- The package looks fine now. However, I'm not sure about file ncrack-services that is placed in /usr/share/ncrack by default. It looks as it could be a candidate for /etc because it's a kind of configuration file. I'm going to ask on fedora-devel. rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/ncrack-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [X] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - not sure whether /usr/share/ncrack/ncrack-services should go to /etc because it's a kind of admin configuration file [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - according to source headers GPLv2 with exceptions [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. $ sha1sum ncrack-0.01ALPHA.tar.gz* 797f3274cfab33091330df6425c251c979a8bfb8 ncrack-0.01ALPHA.tar.gz 797f3274cfab33091330df6425c251c979a8bfb8 ncrack-0.01ALPHA.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1695351 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,... - package builds for all targets [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - no locales [.] MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - no pkgconfig files [.] MUST: .so files must go in a -devel package. - no shared libs [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - no devel package [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,... - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - made a short test, seems to work properly [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - no subpackages [.] SHOULD: .pc files should be placed in a -devel pkg. - no .pc files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211854.n8LIs0gn006647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-21 14:53:59 EDT --- sslogger-0.9-50.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sslogger-0.9-50.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211855.n8LItE9p030071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-21 14:55:13 EDT --- sslogger-0.9-50.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sslogger-0.9-50.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 18:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211856.n8LIudOs030262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-21 14:56:38 EDT --- sslogger-0.9-50.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sslogger-0.9-50.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524698] New: Review Request: perl-Yahoo-Marketing perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Yahoo-Marketing perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524698 Summary: Review Request: perl-Yahoo-Marketing perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chrismcc at pricegrabber.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I think these will work: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693274 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1693274&name=perl-Yahoo-Marketing-5.21-1.fc12.src.rpm Yahoo-Marketing A module for using Yahoo Search Marketing's new Web Services. See http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/developer/docs/index.php SYNOPSIS This collection of modules makes interacting with Yahoo! Search Marketing's Web Services as easy as possible. Asked upstream maintainer and they are fine with including this. I only use RHEL and would like to add this to EPEL. I do not currently do not have any fedora servers. I am willing to maintain for fedora also, but testing might be dificult. The test build from above was generated with cpanscec and built against fedora current. For EPEL perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601 and perl-Test-Class are needed. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1693247. I have emailed maintainers about adding to EPEL or allowing me to co-maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211915.n8LJFChg001629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #12 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-09-21 15:15:10 EDT --- Ping? Any reviewer available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211922.n8LJMuZ4003195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode 2009-09-21 15:22:55 EDT --- New version with includedir stuff fixed: http://openslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/tmp/openslide.spec http://openslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/tmp/openslide-2.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211925.n8LJPgvC004032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #17 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-21 15:25:39 EDT --- I promise you i will take a look this week! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211929.n8LJTXcF013924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 15:29:32 EDT --- OK, thanks. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211933.n8LJXYTJ014930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #12 from Steve Milner 2009-09-21 15:33:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review! It could go in /etc/ ... but the man page has this: --datadir directoryname (Specify custom Ncrack data file location) . Ncrack needs a file called ncrack-services to load a lookup-table of supported services/ports. This file shouldn?t be changed, unless you know what you are doing (e.g extending Ncrack for additional modules). If you think I should move (or symlink) into sysconfdir I'll make the change :-). I'm also fixing the man page which has a wrong path in it (it states /usr/local/share instead of /usr/share/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211939.n8LJd5O1016111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #53 from Ed Brand 2009-09-21 15:39:04 EDT --- Rebuilt for F-11, and requests submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211945.n8LJjm91017819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-21 15:45:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thanks for the review! You're welcome. > It could go in /etc/ ... but the man page has this: ... Yes, I read the paragraph of the man page. I was just wondering whether there is some kind of Fedora policy that forces us to move the file to /etc. If there's no such demand, I can directly approve the package. Otherwise some patching is required first. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 19:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909211950.n8LJohQm009557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-21 15:50:41 EDT --- perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212012.n8LKCb7F017442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 16:12:35 EDT --- Koji F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1695723 Clean rpmlint: $ rpmlint /home/michel/Download/frepple*frepple-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This package is approved -- what's your FAS username, so I can sponsor the application? And welcome to Fedora :) ping me if you have any questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] New: Review Request: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Summary: Review Request: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chronojump.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-11/chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ChronoJump is an open hardware, free software, multiplatform complete system for measurement, management and statistics of sport short-time tests. Chronojump uses a contact platform and/or photocells, and also a chronometer printed circuit designed ad-hoc in order to obtain precise and trustworthy measurements. Chronojump is used by trainers, teachers and students. CJ is an awarded project supported by the active research work of Xavier de Blas $ rpmlint -iv chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.src.rpm chronojump.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -iv chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.i586.rpm chronojump.i586: I: checking chronojump.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/chronojump/libchronopic.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint -iv chronojump-doc-0.8.10-1.fc11.i586.rpm chronojump-doc.i586: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I know it's expected to have clean rpmlint but it's weird for me to create an devel package for libchronopic.so only, specially considering is not expected to be used for developing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212032.n8LKWomx028990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Adam Goode 2009-09-21 16:32:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openslide Short Description: library for reading virtual slides Owners: agoode Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212038.n8LKcKXX030896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 16:38:19 EDT --- Ah, thanks for catching that. I fixed that in another netbook package, and missed it for maximus. Fixed it and updated the package to 0.4.12: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/netbook/maximus-0.4.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1695860 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212049.n8LKnVaR027075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 16:49:30 EDT --- Missed a new dependency on unique-devel. Same SRPM URL. Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1695877 $ rpmlint maximus-0.4.12-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 20:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212050.n8LKoXip027597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Christian Krause 2009-09-21 16:50:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clutter-sharp Short Description: C#/.NET bindings to Clutter Owners: chkr Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 21:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212113.n8LLDN9A011929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-21 17:13:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bournal Short Description: Write personal, password-protected journal entries Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 21:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212111.n8LLB5sL011137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-21 17:11:03 EDT --- Maybe I'm missing something, but how come this blocks 468230 (TG2 review) if it is built _on top of_ TG ? Shouldn't 468230 be in "Depends on" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 21:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212115.n8LLFkqr005536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 --- Comment #3 from Adrien Schreque 2009-09-21 17:15:45 EDT --- For Tkinter dependency, you're right. The code source contains explicit import of tkinter. The SPEC file should add an explicit dependency to Tkinter. I will correct this. As far as I know, EditObj 2 has superseded previous version and was a full rewrite. But is there obsolote code in it, I prefer ask upstream. As I receive a response of upstream team, I post here the answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 21:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212147.n8LLlNxq021633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #1 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-21 17:47:22 EDT --- MUST * OK: rpmlint # rpmlint lua-lunit.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * OK: package name * OK: package version and release * OK: spec file name * OP: package guideline-compliant * OK: license complies with guidelines * OK: license field accurate * OK: license file not deleted * OK: spec in US English * OK: spec legible * OK: source matches upstream sha256sum 09efe9f35132353c6810c57367cba29659afc7348ff593c529cbee1831d66d7a * OK: builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded * OK: dependencies (requires) * FAIL: build dependencies complete lua >= %{luaver} should be in BR for %check to work. The lua package actually is pulled in (cf. root.log from scratch build below), but this is only intermediate, should be included directly as BR. * N/A: locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale * N/A: library -> ldconfig * N/A: relocatable: give reason * N/A: own all directories * OK: no dupes in %files * OK: permission * OK: %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT * FAIL: macros used consistently Most of the time you use %{dir} macros, but then you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, should be %{buildroot} * OK: Package contains code * N/A: large docs => -doc * OK: doc not runtime dependent * N/A: headers in -devel * N/A: static in -static * N/A: if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig * N/A: if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel * N/A: devel requires versioned base package * N/A: desktop file uses desktop-file-install * OK: clean buildroot before install * OK: filenames UTF-8 SHOULD * OK: if license text missing, ask upstream to include it * N/A: desc and summary contain translations if available * OK: package builds in mock on all architectures https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1695926 * OK: package functions as described # lunit /usr/share/doc/lua-lunit-0.4/example.lua Loaded testsuite with 4 tests in 2 testcases. F... 6 Assertions checked. 1) Failure (simple.test_failure): /usr/share/doc/lua-lunit-0.4/example.lua:13: true expected but was false /usr/share/doc/lua-lunit-0.4/example.lua:13: This test always fails! Testsuite finished (3 passed, 1 failed, 0 errors). * OK: scriplets are sane If %check fails, you should cat testlog.txt such that the user knows what happened. * N/A: other subpackages should require versioned base * N/A: if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package * N/A: require package not files Question: Is the koji scratch build enough to assert "package builds in mock on all architectures"? Preventing approval: - BR lua missing - Inconsistent macro usage (I know that's debatable, but the guidelines state that you should stick to one type or the other) Both are only minor, but for the first review I must be pedantic, right ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212202.n8LM2dNg028316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 --- Comment #4 from Adrien Schreque 2009-09-21 18:02:38 EDT --- Sorry, I miss the point from previous question indead. You meant, is the current package is for releasing EditObj 2 or previous release ? Well, this package contains only EditObj 2, if this was your question. If not, could you detailled your question ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212206.n8LM672t023032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-21 18:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > A few comments, as I wait for this to build: > > Parallel make would really be nice. Is it not working? I note the firefox > spec has some bizarre code to conditionally use a limited parallel make. I've just tried with the parallel flag and it didn't liked. For writing this spec I've based on the seamonkey one, which seems a bit outdated, BTW. > The version does not seem correct. If upstream releases 0.8 (as their web > pages indicate that they will) then you will need to use an epoch as 0.8 is > less than 0.8a4. The proper way to do this is explained in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages: > kompozer-0.8-0.1.a4 Fine! Done. > Unfortunately the package has failed to build for me, in mock, on x86_64 > rawhide: > [...] > > I'm afraid I do not completely understand what's gone wrong. I think it's the > "-Wl,/usr/lib64" there, as that passes /usr/lib64 directly to ld and I don't > think there's any reason to pass a directory name without an option flag to ld. I've tried to add x64 support asked by a user but my system is x32 so is hard to detect troubles like this :-/ The updated spec: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212206.n8LM6o24023242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-21 18:06:49 EDT --- Hello, I am not in the packager group and will not be able to approve this package. I'm just reviewing. I hope you find this helpful. Here are a few issues I've discovered so far: * As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions , tar shouldn't be listed as a BuildRequirement. * Is this an upstream issue? Maybe a link should be provided to clear things up. # Not included till it gets fixed. #%{__tar} -xzf example/SWISH-Stemmer-0.05.tar.gz * The perl module should include the versioned MODULE_COMPAT Requires, as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires I suggest to also use that naming scheme for perl Requires: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * The devel package should Requires: pkgconfig as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#cite_note-pkgconfig-21 * I've also found the following issues with rpmlint: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*rpm perl-SWISH.i586: W: no-documentation perl-SWISH.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/PhraseHighlight.pm perl-SWISH.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/DateRanges.pm perl-SWISH.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/DefaultHighlight.pm ...etcetera... swish-e.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libswish-e.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 swish-e.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/SWISH-CONFIG.1.gz swish-e.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man1/SWISH-FAQ.1.gz swish-e.src:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/perl/* swish-e.src:95: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*cgi swish-e.src:97: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/swishspider swish-e.src:98: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*pl swish-e-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/swish-e-2.4.7/src/expat/xmlparse/xmlparse.h swish-e-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/swish-e-doc-2.4.7/pod/SWISH-FAQ.pod swish-e-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/swish-e-doc-2.4.7/pod/CHANGES.pod swish-e-doc.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/swish-e-doc-2.4.7/pod/SWISH-CONFIG.pod swish-e-perl.i586: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 24 errors, 9 warnings. I'll be happy to continue this review after these issues are resolved. Time to sleep now ;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212217.n8LMHaZi027740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 --- Comment #1 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-21 18:17:35 EDT --- MUST * OK: rpmlint # rpmlint lua-json.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint lua-json-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint lua-json-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * OK: package name * OK: package version and release * OK: spec file name * OK: package guideline-compliant * OK: license complies with guidelines * OK: license field accurate * OK: license file not deleted * OK: spec in US English * OK: spec legible * ?: source matches upstream sha256sum 32650b8f35ff57c0ce79aca2ed659f1fe50c50b5237c520ee61518b6c4a05949 * OK: builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded * OK: dependencies (requires) * OK: build dependencies complete * N/A: locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale * N/A: library -> ldconfig * N/A: relocatable: give reason * FAIL: own all directories Must contain in %files: %dir %{luapkgdir}/json %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/decode %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/encode * OK: no dupes in %files * OK: permission * OK: %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT * FAIL: macros used consistently Most of the time you use %{dir} macros, but then you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, should be %{buildroot} * OK: Package contains code * N/A: large docs => -doc * OK: doc not runtime dependent * N/A: headers in -devel * N/A: static in -static * N/A: if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig * N/A: if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel * N/A: devel requires versioned base package * N/A: desktop file uses desktop-file-install * OK: clean buildroot before install * OK: filenames UTF-8 SHOULD * OK: if license text missing, ask upstream to include it * N/A: desc and summary contain translations if available * N/A: package build in mock on all architectures lua-lunit not tagged in koji build root, therefore no scratch build possible * ?: package functioned as described %check suggests so, haven't checked myself. * OK: scriplets are sane If %check fails, you should cat testlog.txt such that the user knows what happened. * N/A: other subpackages should require versioned base * N/A: if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package * OK: require package not files Preventing approval: - Directories must be owned - Consistent macro usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212226.n8LMQeoj000591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #15 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-21 18:26:38 EDT --- Mark, I'm new to this. Do I have to do anything to make this happen? I don't see any flags set on the BZ, so I guess I do. Any idea what? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212231.n8LMVhtv009442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 18:31:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * ?: source matches upstream > sha256sum 32650b8f35ff57c0ce79aca2ed659f1fe50c50b5237c520ee61518b6c4a05949 Not sure how that happens. I just redownloaded twice: spectool -gf lua-json.spec and verified the old SRPM, and the two downloads. All of them check out: $ sha1sum luajson-1.0.tar.bz2.try1 luajson-1.0.tar.bz2 /home/michel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/luajson-1.0.tar.bz2 ca09374ec38b94573232e82e8b27c960c6f5cd9e luajson-1.0.tar.bz2.try1 ca09374ec38b94573232e82e8b27c960c6f5cd9e luajson-1.0.tar.bz2 ca09374ec38b94573232e82e8b27c960c6f5cd9e /home/michel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/luajson-1.0.tar.bz2 > * FAIL: own all directories > Must contain in %files: > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/decode > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/encode Not really: I do own everything under %luapkgdir}. The %dir directive would instruct RPM to own the directory only, without the files within, necessitating additional lines for %{luapkgdir}/json/decode/* and %{luapkgdir}/json/encode/* Best way to check is to do rpm -qpl on the binary RPM itself > * FAIL: macros used consistently > Most of the time you use %{dir} macros, but then you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, > should be %{buildroot} Hm. RPM_BUILD_ROOT is allowed, I think. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#macros what's not allowed is mixing up %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT within the same spec file. > Preventing approval: > - Directories must be owned > - Consistent macro usage These two are, I think, non-issues. Do let me know; I'll use %{buildroot} if you insist :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212238.n8LMcBvk011522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 18:38:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * FAIL: build dependencies complete > lua >= %{luaver} should be in BR for %check to work. The lua package actually > is pulled in (cf. root.log from scratch build below), but this is only > intermediate, should be included directly as BR. That's a good suggestion. lua is pulled in right now because rpm-libs depend on it, but making this explicit would be a good idea. > * FAIL: macros used consistently > Most of the time you use %{dir} macros, but then you use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, > should be %{buildroot} Non-issue, as in lua-json, but again, I can change this if you insist. > Question: > Is the koji scratch build enough to assert "package builds in mock on all > architectures"? Enough, yes. Well, all primary architectures: Koji builds on %{ix86}, x86_64, ppc and ppc64. Sometimes the package has to be modified later because the ARM and SPARC porting projects report errors, but that cannot be done during review. > Preventing approval: > - BR lua missing > - Inconsistent macro usage (I know that's debatable, but the guidelines state > that you should stick to one type or the other) One style or another for buildroot, I think. That's my interpretation anyway :) SRPM updated, at the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 22:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212258.n8LMwSFk011937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-21 18:58:26 EDT --- Looks good to me now, I agree on your buildroot guideline interpretation. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212303.n8LN3Cl5019510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-21 19:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > and verified the old SRPM, and the two downloads. All of them check out: > > $ sha1sum luajson-1.0.tar.bz2.try1 luajson-1.0.tar.bz2 I had given the sha256sum, while you used sha1sum... My bad, I simply forgot to replace ? by OK. So yes, the checksums of your SRPM and the original source do match! > > * FAIL: own all directories > > Must contain in %files: > > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json > > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/decode > > %dir %{luapkgdir}/json/encode > Not really: I do own everything under %luapkgdir}. The %dir directive would > instruct RPM to own the directory only, without the files within, necessitating > additional lines for %{luapkgdir}/json/decode/* and %{luapkgdir}/json/encode/* I remember being instructed once to explicitly name all directories. But checking some of my other packages confirms your statement. The %dir was used in "special" situations (e.g. in the lua-sql package). So this seems to be ok then. I did check the package contains, but was unsure about possible meta data %dir might record. > what's not allowed is mixing up %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT within the > same spec file. Yes, that's what I thought before I read the guidelines and how many of my spec files actually look. I leave it up to you. And as said in #522979 I agree with your interpretation of the buildroot guideline (now after I have thought about it a second time...). Since the %dir issue is actually none: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212328.n8LNSZqh022509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Matthew Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212328.n8LNS9fm028192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Booth 2009-09-21 19:28:06 EDT --- Can you double check the above for me? I get: [mbooth at x60 EL-5]$ cvs commit cvs commit: Examining . ? perl-XML-XPathEngine-0.12-1.el5.src.rpm ? noarch ? XML-XPathEngine-0.12.tar.gz ? XML-XPathEngine-0.12 ? .build-0.12-1.el5.log **** Access denied: mdbooth is not in ACL for rpms/perl-XML-XPathEngine/EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212334.n8LNYC01024383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 19:34:11 EDT --- Please try now. Turns out that pkgdb doesn't like seeing more than one owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212339.n8LNdCBn031471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 19:39:11 EDT --- The package I downloaded from the URL above contains editobj 1, or at least that is how it seems. Version 0.5.7 of editobj1, which it seems that you have packaged, is from 2006; the last editobj2 version (0.2.1) came out in March of this year. So it seems that this package does not contain editobj2 at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212341.n8LNf207032373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 19:41:01 EDT --- Sorry, could you provide links to the updated spec and src.rpm? All I see is the original 1.27-1. (If that's not the same 1.27-1 that I originally reviewed, now I suppose you know why we request that you increase Release: when you modify your submission.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 21 23:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909212342.n8LNgbqi000384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-21 19:42:35 EDT --- > $ rpmlint -iv chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.i586.rpm > chronojump.i586: I: checking > chronojump.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib/chronojump/libchronopic.so > A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If > you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a > development package. If this is not meant for other software to use, then it can be ignored, yes. > I know it's expected to have clean rpmlint but it's weird for me to create an > devel package for libchronopic.so only, specially considering is not expected > to be used for developing. Most Mono packages don't have clean rpmlint outputs either, just because rpmlint does not consider .dll and .exe to be libraries and executables :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 00:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220032.n8M0Wiwf015779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: A |Review Request: chronojump |measurement, management and |- A measurement, management |statistics sport testing |and statistics sport |tool |testing tool --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 20:32:42 EDT --- Please try to follow the usual format for review tickets; we need to be able to search the ticket summary for the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 00:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220051.n8M0p0NA015699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #10 from Silas Sewell 2009-09-21 20:50:58 EDT --- Kanarip, I believe this package is ready to go barring a formal review. I've started work on a func replacement so I'm not going to spend a bunch of time on funcshell, but I'm sure some people would like having it in the official repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220108.n8M18YBi026632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 --- Comment #6 from Adrien Schreque 2009-09-21 21:08:33 EDT --- True, my bad. In fact, this is EditObj version 1. I confused myself between the two versions. Here is the correct version : Spec URL: http://adrien.schreque.free.fr/repo/python-editobj2.spec SRPM URL: http://adrien.schreque.free.fr/repo/python-editobj2-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm My apologies for my mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220132.n8M1WMpI027116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:32:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232160] Review Request: ruby-gnome2 - A ruby binding of libgnome/libgnomeui-2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220132.n8M1WnPQ027226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232160 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #49 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:32:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220134.n8M1YWYp000847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:34:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220137.n8M1bAh8028730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:37:08 EDT --- I've done the EL-5 branch, but I note that this package is currently orphaned in rawhide. If the goal was to revive it, shouldn't someone own it so that it will branch for F-12? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220135.n8M1ZSF4028234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:35:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220145.n8M1jjik004344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:45:39 EDT --- I can't parse the only CVS request I see, in comment 32. In addition, the reason that you cannot set the cvs request flag is because you have not been sponsored and thus cannot own packages in Fedora. I don't see that you ever indicated that you need a sponsor, and I don't recall whether or not Rakesh has the ability to sponsor you. Rakesh, if you are able and willing to sponsor Polychronis, please do so. If you cannot or do not wish to do so, please clear the fedora-review flag and go ahead and have this ticket block FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Once the sponsorship dance has been done, please submit a corrected CVS request and set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220147.n8M1lDHp031343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:47:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220149.n8M1nNlt005194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:49:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220148.n8M1mJ2K004931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 21:48:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220149.n8M1nsLQ031889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 01:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220149.n8M1nvW6031935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #38 from Robin Norwood 2009-09-21 21:49:56 EDT --- Poly and Rakesh - I'm willing to sponsor and/or co-own the package if you need. I haven't had a lot of time to devote to Fedora or OLPC stuff lately, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220205.n8M25eRP004131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:05:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220208.n8M28Mxh004773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-21 22:08:20 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan, for the review. I will add a workaround for the doc conflict. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-network Short Description: Haskell network library Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220209.n8M29EkT010980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:09:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220207.n8M27qSJ010645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:07:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220210.n8M2A3jH005582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:10:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220211.n8M2BTVt006150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:11:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220210.n8M2AWSw005912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:10:31 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220217.n8M2HT0x008356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-21 22:17:28 EDT --- For cvs requests, you need to set the fedora-cvs flag to ? Since I was already CC'ed here, I went ahead and processed the request. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220241.n8M2fWgh017227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #5 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-21 22:41:31 EDT --- Sorry -- I didn't realise that I needed to start increasing the Release number before the package was in Fedora. Thanks for the pointer! The new .src.rpm is here: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27-2.fc11.src.rpm and the new spec file is here: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext.spec Scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1696557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220251.n8M2p7ug024849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #39 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2009-09-21 22:51:06 EDT --- Robin - thanks for the "sponsorship" and it would be great if you 'd like to co-own the package. To be honest, I was not even aware of those procedures. Please let me know when the sponsorship is set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 03:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220314.n8M3E7Nt029352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #40 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 23:14:06 EDT --- Polychronis, it may be useful for you to read through this if you haven't already done so: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 03:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220351.n8M3pp5x032054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #11 from Mel Chua 2009-09-21 23:51:50 EDT --- education-bookmarks.src: E: invalid-spec-name Fixed: it is now called education-bookmarks.spec education-bookmarks.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 2) Fixed: tabs have been replaced with spaces. Source0 should be a complete URL. Fixed: it is. (I am not sure why "%{_datadir}/bookmarks" is identical to the current files section - it's definitely shorter - but this seems to work, so I guess it is okay.) Applied to packager group, FAS username mchua. Rex has been CC'd on the cvsadmin request. Thanks, Rex, Bjorn, and Sebastian! http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/education-bookmarks/education-bookmarks.spec http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/packages/education-bookmarks/education-bookmarks-1-1.fc10.src.rpm https://fedorahosted.org/education/browser/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 03:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220355.n8M3tWRk000383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Mel Chua 2009-09-21 23:55:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: education-bookmarks Short Description: Education SIG bookmarks Owners: mchua sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220521.n8M5Lvwd020372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag|fedora-cvs- | --- Comment #41 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-22 01:21:56 EDT --- Thanks Jason, cleared fedora-cvs request till Poly gets sponsored and added FE-NEEDSPONSOR @Robin If you consider it apt, you may sponsor Poly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 05:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220548.n8M5miqg019399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-22 01:48:42 EDT --- I am not sure about the importance of this package though it has been in the distro for a long time. Most of the fonts seem to be duplicated in xorg-x11-fonts. At least the ucs-fonts and lucidatypewriter are AFAICT. $ cd bitmap-fonts/devel/bitmap-fonts-0.3 $ find -name "*.bdf" | wc -l 33 $ for i in *.bdf; do find xorg-x11-fonts/devel/xorg-x11-fonts-7.2/font-misc-misc-1.0.0 -name $i ; done | wc -l 44 which only seems to really leave fangsongti. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 06:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220626.n8M6QmQM032723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-22 02:26:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdpauinfo Short Description: Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 06:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220636.n8M6aS04029069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #16 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-22 02:36:27 EDT --- >>And welcome to Fedora :) ping me if you have any questions. Thanks! I'm glad to join the club. I have just created a FAS account as user "jdetaeye". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] New: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 Summary: Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive/perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.077-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Convenient wrapper for Getopt::Long and program usage output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220724.n8M7OGxm011372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-22 03:24:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.8.8-2.fc11.src.rpm This took longer than I hoped, sorry. All of the above mentioned fixed (except for the setup.py install thingy as I commented before). Looking for the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220729.n8M7Tnxj012279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 03:29:48 EDT --- Christoph, you should avoid compressing the man pages manually as the compression format depends on the target system and rpm applies it automatically. I'd suggest to modify the %build and %install section like this: %build make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL='install -p' install -Dpm0644 Debian/%{name}.1 %{buildroot}/%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220731.n8M7VawK007205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |524784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220732.n8M7Wsvt012971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 03:32:53 EDT --- Oh, and I forgot to mention the %files section: %{_mandir}/man1/* :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 07:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220741.n8M7fO3c009139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 03:41:23 EDT --- The licensing is also a bit unclear: - LICENSE contains GPLv3 - gtrayicon.glade refers to GPLv3+ - the SVG files link to GPLv2: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 08:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220811.n8M8B2pM021002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 04:11:01 EDT --- perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 08:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220833.n8M8XOpo019986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-22 04:33:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Oh, and I forgot to mention the %files section: > %{_mandir}/man1/* I understand the rest of your points but not this one. What's the benefit of changing the line? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 08:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220846.n8M8kFX7022891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 04:46:14 EDT --- Maybe %{_mandir}/man1/* is a bit too general, %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* is probably a better choice. I just wanted to ensure that all dependencies on a particular compression format (including the suffix) are avoided. The above variants will even work on targets with uncompressed man pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 09:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220904.n8M94Ic5000479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-22 05:04:17 EDT --- Sometimes also you have to wait for up to 1 hour(?) for the change in ACLs to propagate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 09:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220930.n8M9UYpw000746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-22 05:30:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Just noticed, > /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html > > Conflicts with fedora-bookmarks, which is in the least very strongly > discouraged, mind using something else, maybe > /usr/share/bookmarks/education-bookmarks.html ? > > (which may or may not work out of the box, would have to check how browsers > consume stuff in /usr/share/bookmarks) #001 Source0 Source0: default-bookmarks.html should be Source0: education-default-bookmarks.html with install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE0} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html This prevents upload of another html by mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 09:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220933.n8M9Xj5k007933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-22 05:33:43 EDT --- #002 File a bug report against "astronomy-bookmarks" to add Conflicts: education-bookmarks http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/astronomy-bookmarks/devel/astronomy-bookmarks.spec?view=markup Do not push the education-bookmarks to the repos until the astronomy-bookmarks has been tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 09:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220945.n8M9jlvq011228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-22 05:45:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-xmonad-contrib Short Description: Third party extensions for xmonad Owners: ynemoy petersen bos Branches: F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 10:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221027.n8MARkN9013147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #6 from Julian Sikorski 2009-09-22 06:27:06 EDT --- New release: Spec URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS.spec SRPM URL: http://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/EMBOSS-6.1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Changes: - Added the upstream 1-2 patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 10:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221052.n8MAqU0u025260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #11 from Colin Coe 2009-09-22 06:52:28 EDT --- Hi and thanks for taking over this BZ. I've no idea why I commented out the full URL. I've removed the short entry and uncommented the full URL. http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.8.1.1-5el5.src.rpm CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 11:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520886] Review Request: fastback - support file uploader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221144.n8MBikQu029542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520886 --- Comment #17 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-09-22 07:44:45 EDT --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 11:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523967] Review Request: ldapvi - Interactive LDAP client for Unix terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221154.n8MBsTGE006100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523967 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com, | |mcepl at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2009-09-22 07:54:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I've done the EL-5 branch, but I note that this package is currently orphaned > in rawhide. If the goal was to revive it, shouldn't someone own it so that it > will branch for F-12? Thanks, and yes there is some mess in bit for this package. I have reopened https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2201 so hopefully jk_eating will take a look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 13:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221340.n8MDethi032121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-22 09:40:54 EDT --- Got it, the debuginfo happened to be bug of rpmbuild (bug 524844). Updated files: SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnsd/rhnsd.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnsd/rhnsd-4.5.13-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 13:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221346.n8MDkG66000964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-22 09:46:13 EDT --- Well, thanks for the review, it had been waiting for a long time! Sorry if I sounded harsh, I did not mean to discourage you; I was just a bit surprised about your comments about sponsorship. I've fixed the sed issue. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol-1.273-5.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: firehol Short Description: A powerful yet easy to use iptables frontend Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221401.n8ME1Bn3005292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-22 10:01:10 EDT --- Well, if it's really a bug in rpmbuild, I guess I can't blame you for it. I still get the error msg but I guess you only fixed that on your system :) Everything else seems fixed, including the LICENSE file (and license change) from upstream :) Going to approve this, next step is to do the CVS admin request: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rhnsd) is APPROVED by red (Sandro Mathys) ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221422.n8MEMHDA011169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221424.n8MEO0QV005039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-22 10:23:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rhnsd Short Description: Red Hat Network query daemon Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221429.n8METQJK006629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #23 from Adam Huffman 2009-09-22 10:29:22 EDT --- Just to let you know, tried building this on an F10 box with a Koji-build version of MMDB. The build failed with the following error: g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"co ot\" -DVERSION=\"0.6-pre-1\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_M EMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -I. -I../compat -I../coords - I../ccp4mg-utils -I../coot-utils -I../intl -I../skeleton -I../angles -I../atom-utils -I../db-main -I../mini-mol -I../ligand -I../se quence-view -I../geometry -I../ideal -I../coot-surface -I../surface -I../density-contour -I../build -I../high-res -I../analysis -I. ./cootaneer -DHAVE_SYS_STDTYPES_H=0 -DUSE_GUILE -pthread -DHAVE_GNOME_CANVAS -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/pa ngo-1.0 -I/usr/include/gail-1.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DCOOT_USE_GTK2_INTERFACE -I/usr/include/gtkglext-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtkglext-1.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -DHAVE_SSMLIB -DHAVE_MMDB_IGNORE_HASH -DHAVE_MMDB_WITH_CISPEP -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/gpp4 -I/usr/include/pygtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/mmdb -I/usr/include/ssm -DPKGDATADIR='"/usr/share/coot"' -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR='"/usr/share/coot/locale"' -DDATADIR='"/usr/share"' -DCOOT_SYS_BUILD_TYPE='"Linux-x86_64-fedora-10-python-gtk2"' -DHAVE_SYS_STDTYPES_H=0 -DUSE_GUILE -pthread -DUSE_PYTHON -I/usr/include/python2.5 -DUSE_PYGTK -DHAVE_GSL -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -MT c-interface-gui.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/c-interface-gui.Tpo -c -o c-interface-gui.o c-interface-gui.cc c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void coot_real_exit(int)': c-interface-gui.cc:1208: error: 'class clipper::ClipperInstance' has no member named 'destroy' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void add_filechooser_filter_button(GtkWidget*, short int)': c-interface-gui.cc:1279: warning: unused variable 'i' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void add_recentre_on_read_pdb_checkbutton(GtkWidget*)': c-interface-gui.cc:1763: warning: unused variable 'tooltips' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void set_refine_params_toggle_buttons(GtkWidget*)': c-interface-gui.cc:2319: warning: unused variable 'link_torsion_type_vbox' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void show_model_toolbar_all_icons()': c-interface-gui.cc:2595: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void show_model_toolbar_main_icons()': c-interface-gui.cc:2622: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void update_model_toolbar_icons_menu()': c-interface-gui.cc:2654: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void fill_go_to_atom_window(GtkWidget*)': c-interface-gui.cc:4509: warning: unused variable 'text' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'GtkWidget* wrapped_create_add_additional_representation_gui()': c-interface-gui.cc:5181: warning: unused variable 'chain_id_entry' c-interface-gui.cc:5182: warning: unused variable 'resno_start_entry' c-interface-gui.cc:5183: warning: unused variable 'resno_end_entry' c-interface-gui.cc:5184: warning: unused variable 'ins_code_entry' c-interface-gui.cc:5185: warning: unused variable 'string_selection_entry' c-interface-gui.cc:5187: warning: unused variable 'position_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc:5188: warning: unused variable 'resno_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc:5189: warning: unused variable 'selection_string_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc:5191: warning: unused variable 'add_reps_fat_bonds_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc:5192: warning: unused variable 'add_reps_ball_and_stick_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void add_additional_representation_by_widget(GtkWidget*)': c-interface-gui.cc:5215: warning: unused variable 'option_menu' c-interface-gui.cc:5227: warning: unused variable 'add_reps_fat_bonds_radiobutton' c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void show_restraints_editor_by_index(int)': c-interface-gui.cc:5334: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions There were further warnings after this. The version of clipper installed is clipper-2.1-4.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221437.n8MEblfB014580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #42 from Robin Norwood 2009-09-22 10:37:42 EDT --- Poly, I believe you need to go to your fedora account page to request sponsorship from there, then I can approve you: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/ypod -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 14:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221441.n8MEfC63009693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-22 10:41:11 EDT --- Regarding the Conflicts, is this something that we should use alternatives for? We're going to be making more of these packages as the number of spins increases. As far as I can tell, they're used by the spin creators to make the default bookmark set so they are meant to setup at system creation rather than per user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 15:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221523.n8MFNqmc020790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 11:23:51 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 15:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221521.n8MFLv31026303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 11:21:56 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 15:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] New: Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Summary: Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vecmath.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vecmath-0-1.20090922.fc11.src.rpm Description: The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath. rpmlint output is clean. I need this to update Jmol to the 11.8 series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221607.n8MG7sOo005319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #31 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-22 12:07:50 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r3048/fife.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r3048/fife-2009.0-0.18.r3048svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221609.n8MG9PvH031695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 12:09:24 EDT --- Okay. --------------------------------------------------- This package (editarea) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221609.n8MG9sOZ031754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 12:09:52 EDT --- According to the replies I got from fedora-devel it's not necessary to move the file to /etc, so we can finish here. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221628.n8MGSqHq003750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:28:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221630.n8MGUsR8010778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 12:30:53 EDT --- Would you post the URL to your spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221626.n8MGQuCA009392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #14 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-22 12:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Well, thanks for the review, it had been waiting for a long time! That was one of my reasons to choose this request. > Sorry if I sounded harsh, I did not mean to discourage you; I was just a bit > surprised about your comments about sponsorship. No problem. Actually this is my first review and a funny story together ;-) I started "5 days" ago and everybody told me to tell as much as possible about myself and my package to find and convince a sponsor/reviewer. I just wanted to give this tip/hind on because this request was waiting quite long. Now to the real interesting stuff: review of firehol-1.273-5.fc11.src.rpm (sha256sum 4ee2dd849a38948fc9c2ed8463089628429b9e81423633892b2b88e77ffdd61e) [ OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint SPECS/firehol.spec SRPMS/firehol-1.273-5.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/firehol-1.273-5.fc11.noarch.rpm firehol.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/firehol/firehol.conf 0640 firehol.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firehol 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Actually firehol uses /var/lock/subsys where it touches "firehol" and "iptables" when it starts. I guess rpmlint does not recognize that because it is hidden in the bash script. A grep after "FIREHOL_LOCK_DIR" in /etc/init.d/firehol explains this. [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [ OK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. sha256sum: e8d3b4ac3e54097c0e0f14bfab773a75d43b522fa123a42088b7f23f13495ea2 Download/firehol-1.273.tar.bz2 e8d3b4ac3e54097c0e0f14bfab773a75d43b522fa123a42088b7f23f13495ea2 SOURCES/firehol-1.273.tar.bz2 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [ OK ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Not relevant, since noarch. [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. No "BuildRequires" available. Only "Requires" which are OK. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK because no locales available. [ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK because only shell scripts get installed. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [ OK ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK because only shell scripts are used. [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. $ rpmls RPMS/noarch/firehol-1.273-5.fc11.noarch.rpm | grep ^d drwxr-xr-x /etc/firehol drwxr-xr-x /etc/firehol/services drwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273 drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples drwxr-xr-x /var/spool/firehol [ OK ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. All permissions seem to be fine (checked via rpmls). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ OK ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK because only shell scripts are shipped. [ OK ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK like above. [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK since no pkgconfig is used. [ OK ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ OK ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [ OK ] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ NA ] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ OK ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Builds fine with mock on fedora-11-ppc. [ NA ] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Since it is a noarch package it's not really interesting I guess. Only shell scripts get copied no compilation at all. [ OK ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. More or less OK. I did a few starts and stops. The rules are loaded properly. [ OK ] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ OK ] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK since pkgconfig isn't used. [ OK ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. ############################################################################# I noticed one thing during extensive testing. A few arguments to the init script aren't supported. The init script guidlines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Required_Actions) insist on the following missing arguments: - try-restart (I guess this is not a big problem since condrestart is available) - reload (may be negligible too) Additionally condrestart didn't work for me like expected. For example: $ /etc/init.d/firehol start FireHOL: Saving your old firewall to a temporary file: [ OK ] FireHOL: Processing file /etc/firehol/firehol.conf: [ OK ] FireHOL: Activating new firewall (41 rules): [ OK ] $ ls -l /var/lock/subsys/firehol -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 2009-09-22 17:36 /var/lock/subsys/firehol $ /etc/init.d/firehol stop FireHOL: Clearing Firewall: [ OK ] $ ls -l /var/lock/subsys/firehol ls: cannot access /var/lock/subsys/firehol: No such file or directory $ iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination $ /etc/init.d/firehol condrestart FireHOL: Saving your old firewall to a temporary file: [ OK ] FireHOL: Processing file /etc/firehol/firehol.conf: [ OK ] FireHOL: Activating new firewall (41 rules): [ OK ] $ iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ... and a lot of rules are up I would have expected that condrestart does nothing since I stopped the service before. Maybe this is a bug in upstream? Otherwise looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221632.n8MGW2ns005199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sm at sandro-mathys.ch Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:32:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221638.n8MGcgRT007148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:38:41 EDT --- Stefan: Whats your Fedora Account system name? I can't seem to find you by your email address used here. You must be in the packager group to approve package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221636.n8MGa5bu012536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:36:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221638.n8MGcHLQ012962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:38:14 EDT --- cvs done. You should probibly hash out if alternatives will be used or something else before importing however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] New: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: perl-Nagios-NSCA module. Provides an perl client to submit passive test results back to Nagios NSCA server. One item I have of concern here is the cpan module contains no license file. Is the default for something from CPAN "GPL+ or Artistic" ? Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1698352 $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec \ SRPMS/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl-Nagios-NSCA.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524898] New: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524898 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: perl-Nagios-NSCA module. Provides an perl client to submit passive test results back to Nagios NSCA server. One item I have of concern here is the cpan module contains no license file. Is the default for something from CPAN "GPL+ or Artistic" ? Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1698352 $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec \ SRPMS/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm perl-Nagios-NSCA.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221645.n8MGjk86009142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-22 12:45:45 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Required_Actions "condrestart (and try-restart): restart the service if the service is already running, if not, do nothing" So everything should be OK. (I must confess, I haven't checked those myself.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221655.n8MGtPGK011309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-22 12:55:24 EDT --- @Stefan : when checking for unowned directories, don't use "grep ^d". It's insufficient @Kevin : account name is "stefansf" @Jussi : then a "service firehol stop ; service firehol condrestart" should not start the service, but according to comment 14 it does -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:05:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:05:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221705.n8MH52mC019290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 13:05:00 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221712.n8MHCm8w021306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Bug 517643 depends on bug 517641, which changed state. Bug 517641 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-22 13:12:46 EDT --- Provides: php-pear(doctrine/%{pear_name}) = %{version} Shouldn't that be: Provides: php-pear(pear.doctrine-project.com/%{pear_name}) = %{version} Looking at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221718.n8MHI9qI022451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-22 13:18:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > @Jussi : then a "service firehol stop ; service firehol condrestart" should not > start the service, but according to comment 14 it does Ugh. I really should not work this tired. I sent an email to the author, I don't have time now to debug the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221723.n8MHNcjj017186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 13:23:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > * GConf2 dependency > - If you don't want to remove GConf2 dependency, I guess the ... If you don't want to "add" GConf2 dependency, ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221719.n8MHJ3Ti016206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 13:19:01 EDT --- Well, * GConf2 dependency - If you don't want to remove GConf2 dependency, I guess the following line in %description should be removed ( because from configure.ac the following feature can be enabled only when compiled with GConf2 ) ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Set image as wallpaper (only under GNOME) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Other things seem good. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (viewnior) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221724.n8MHO9rM023735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #20 from Rene Ploetz 2009-09-22 13:24:07 EDT --- Thank you for your reply, I updated the file locations: Spec URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-3.fc11.src.rpm > * Source > - SOURCE0 included in your srpm differs from what I could > download from the URL written in SOURCE0: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > 198755 2008-04-06 03:40 mysqltcl-3.05.tar.gz > 198617 2008-09-24 08:54 tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-2.fc9.src/mysqltcl-3.05.tar.gz > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > * License > - Actually this is "MIT", not "BSD". > > * Version specific BuildRequires > - I don't think there is any sense to write tcl-devel version > dependency (i.e. >= 8.3.1) where tcl abi dependency is also > specified. FIXED > - "-fomit-frame-pointer" makes debugging very difficult and is > not allowed on Fedora. I added "--enable-symbols" to the configure call. > * %defattr > ----------------------------------------------------------- > %defattr (0644,root,root,0755) > %doc README ChangeLog COPYING AUTHORS README-msqltcl doc/mysqltcl.html > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - Well, I would recommend to change the permissions of these > files at %prep explicitly rather than to use this > %defattr hack. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > %defattr (-,root,root) > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) FIXED > * tests/ directory > - This package contains tests/ directory. If some test program exists, > please create %check stage and execute the test program there. I would like to do that, but unfortunately the tests require that you provide at least a username for a mysql server. Is there server which could be used by koji? I wasn't able to find anything about that in the material for packagers. Koji-Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1698454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221737.n8MHbo9c027339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #54 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 13:37:48 EDT --- Okay. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221741.n8MHfkuV028962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #19 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-22 13:41:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > @Stefan : when checking for unowned directories, don't use "grep ^d". It's > insufficient Jep you're right. I just posted the grep output to minimize it and to assure that I really did it. Maybe it would be more appropriate to paste the full output of rpmls: $ rpmls RPMS/noarch/firehol-1.273-5.fc11.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x /etc/firehol -rw-r----- /etc/firehol/firehol.conf drwxr-xr-x /etc/firehol/services -rwxr-xr-x /etc/rc.d/init.d/firehol drwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol -rwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol/adblock.sh -rwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol/buildrpm.sh -rwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol/firehol.sh -rwxr-xr-x /usr/libexec/firehol/get-iana.sh drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/COPYING -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/TODO -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/WhatIsNew drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/adding.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/commands.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/css.css -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/faq.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/fwtest.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/header.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/index.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/invoking.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/language.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/overview.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/search.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/services.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/support.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/trouble.html -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/doc/tutorial.html drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/client-all.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/home-adsl.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/home-dialup.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/lan-gateway.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/office.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firehol-1.273/examples/server-dmz.conf -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man1/firehol.1.gz -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man5/firehol.conf.5.gz drwxr-xr-x /var/spool/firehol I checked every file + directory and its permissions. Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221751.n8MHpvLb023182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-22 13:51:56 EDT --- Looks good so far! There are several minor things to fix, and one major thing -- the launcher script is broken on 64-bit archs -- the latter is a common problem with our Mono apps, so I guess it's a good thing it's caught during review anyway. Fix them and I can approve this. Koji F-12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1698459 ReviewTemplate MUST OK rpmlint $ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.src.rpm ./chronojump* error checking signature of /home/michel/rpmbuild/SRPMS/chronojump-0.8.10-1.fc11.src.rpm chronojump.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/chronojump/libchronopic.so 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Internal use only, warning can be ignored OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines OK license field accurate OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English OK spec legible OK source matches upstream OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: Koji ? build dependencies complete over-complete: you can drop BR on mono-core since you already BR: mono-devel OK locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale FIX library -> ldconfig since your package does not install any library in the normal ld.so path and does not extend the path (see /etc/ld.so.conf*), running ldconfig is unnecessary (this also gives you the exception from the .so-in-devel rule) FIX own all directories must depend on hicolor-icon-theme for the installed icon OK no dupes in %files OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently not really about macros, but about scriplets. See the guideline about how to OK Package contains code ? large docs => -doc -doc should be in group "Documentation" Also, you can make -doc noarch, starting from RPM 4.6 (i.e. F-10 and above) and since Mono is not available on RHEL, you can just go ahead and declare the subpackage to be noarch without testing for the Fedora/RHEL version first e.g. %package doc ... BuildArch: noarch OK doc not runtime dependent NA if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig NA if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel OK desktop file uses desktop-file-install OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD OK package build in mock on all architectures FIX package functioned as described the launcher script is hardcoded to look for the .exe under /usr/lib instead of %{_libdir}: $ chronojump Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/chronojump/Chronojump.exe': No such file or directory. Unfortunately, a common problem in Mono apps, since Novell's openSUSE is also multilib-capable (like Fedora) and thus they intentionally hard-code /usr/lib because they consider Mono to be noarch, and we don't make that assumption :( FIX scriplets are sane icon cache not updated; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache OK other subpackages should require versioned base OK require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 17:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221755.n8MHtYOO032234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-22 13:55:32 EDT --- One thing I forgot to ask: * Obsoletes - Would you explain why you want "Obsoletes: %{real_name} < %{version}-%{release}" on Fedora? (In reply to comment #20) > > * tests/ directory > > - This package contains tests/ directory. If some test program exists, > > please create %check stage and execute the test program there. > > I would like to do that, but unfortunately the tests require that you provide > at least a username for a mysql server. Is there server which could be used by > koji? I wasn't able to find anything about that in the material for packagers. - Understood. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 18:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221803.n8MI38kP025579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-22 14:03:07 EDT --- Setting UNAPPROVED for now. Config files go in %{_sysconfdir} (/etc on Fedora). This is part of the FHS and there is a Fedora Guideline that we follow the FHS. The question in this package is whether this file is a config file or a data file. In your (Martin) last email you gave an example of when the local system admin might want to modify this file to suit the local site/machine. If this is a valid use then this is a config file. So it needs to be installed somewhere below /etc and the file marked %config or %config(noreplace) in the rpm spec file. For reference, the message with the example https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-September/msg00887.html Sorry people didn't make clear the real factors in deciding whether this needs to get moved to /etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 18:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221822.n8MIMG8X005991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #16 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 14:22:15 EDT --- OK, thanks for the clarification. It shouldn't be too complicated to adapt the sources. I'll have a look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 18:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221837.n8MIbqjw001486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #24 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-22 14:37:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Just to let you know, tried building this on an F10 box with a Koji-build > version of MMDB. The build failed with the following error: > > c-interface-gui.cc: In function 'void coot_real_exit(int)': > c-interface-gui.cc:1208: error: 'class clipper::ClipperInstance' has no member > named 'destroy' > > There were further warnings after this. The version of clipper installed is > clipper-2.1-4.fc10.x86_64 Yeah, you'll need to upgrade clipper as well. You can find the latest either in koji or in the F12 alpha/beta packages. Unforunately, the clipper API changes without bumping the sonames (or the library version number), so its a bit tricky to determine which "version" you need to have installed. >.< -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 20:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222006.n8MK64ql030565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 16:06:02 EDT --- Robin, are you sure you can actually sponsor folks? FAS shows you as a user in the packager group, not a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 20:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222024.n8MKOVwt028049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #44 from Robin Norwood 2009-09-22 16:24:30 EDT --- Jason: Drat, you're correct. I thought I was, but perhaps I lost it along the way somewhere. Ypod: I'm afraid we'll have to find a different sponsor for you, or I could just own the package. Probably the former, since I'm afraid I can't really guarantee that I'll be able to devote the time to proper maintainership. Sorry. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 20:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222043.n8MKhrOv032160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #17 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-22 16:43:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362136) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362136) extends ncrack to look in /etc for configuration files I've attached a patch that extends the ncrack sources to also look in /etc for config files. Steve, you should ask upstream to apply it to the sources or add another mechanism that allows relocating file ncrack-services. The spec file must also be modified: - in the %setup section, apply the patch (with option -p1) - add the following to %install: mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/ncrack-services $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir} - add %config %{_sysconfdir}/ncrack-services to the %files section This is just a suggestion. If necessary, feel free to modify it. Toshio, is it required to put the config file in a subfolder of /etc, or can we place it directly in /etc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222124.n8MLOcHA013921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-22 17:24:35 EDT --- Thanks Peter for your help with this package. (In reply to comment #7) > > The 1st message is indicated a possible design flaw in garmintools. You should > consider asking upstream about it. The issue was opened on May 2009 http://code.google.com/p/garmintools/issues/detail?id=11 > The 2nd and the 3rd messaged should be fixed. Please remove "devel" from the > %post and %postun sections (looks like the leftover), and be careful - don't > forget the %post section which contains "rmmod garmin_gps &>/dev/null || true" fixed > The 4th message should be fixed - you accidentally listed file > %{_libdir}/libgarmintools.so twice - in main package and in devel-subpackage. fixed > - Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files > (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call > ldconfig in %post and %postun. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages above. fixed > - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's > %files listings. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages above. fixed > - The package must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. Unfortunately, main package owns /etc/udev/rules.d and > /etc/modprobe.d > Please use the correct form (note the asterisk mark at the end of the > strings)): > > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/* > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/* fixed rpath was removed. rpmlint output: [fab at laptop016 SRPMS]$ rpmlint garmintools-0.10-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop016 x86_64]$ rpmlint garmintools* garmintools.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgarmintools.so.4.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/garmintools.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/garmintools-0.10-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523537] Review Request: openslide - library for reading virtual slides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222141.n8MLfltu025612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523537 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222154.n8MLs0Aj023077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 17:53:56 EDT --- *** Bug 524898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 21:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524898] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222153.n8MLrxB3023045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524898 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 17:53:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524896 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222202.n8MM2LCb026974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 18:02:15 EDT --- dinotrace-9.4a-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dinotrace-9.4a-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] New: Review Request: toppler - platform game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: toppler - platform game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Summary: Review Request: toppler - platform game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/toppler.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/toppler-1.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Help a cute little green animal switch off some kind of "evil" mechanism. The "power off switch" is hidden somewhere in high towers. On your way to the target you need to avoid a lot of strange robots that guard the tower. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222201.n8MM1ptG000919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 18:01:49 EDT --- There is no default license for code on CPAN. The "Unknown" on the CPAN page should be a reasonable clue to that. You must actually inspect the source to determine the license. All I can see is this in Nagios/NMSCA/Client/CommandLine.pm: NSCA Perl Client 0.1 Copyright (c) 2006 Matthew O'Connor (matthew\@canonical.org) Last Modified: 04-10-2006 License: GPL Encryption Routines: $encrypt Which would seem to suggest GPL+ (and certainly not "GPL+ or Artistic" as you have), but honestly it would be better if you contact the author for clarification. If you can obtain a statement of the license via email, you can include the text of the email in the package. If you can't get clarification for whatever reason then I think GPL+ would do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222203.n8MM3I9w001341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #15 from Christian Krause 2009-09-22 18:03:16 EDT --- Thanks for the new package. Please see my comments below: (In reply to comment #14) > Spec URL: > http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings.spec > SRPM URL: > http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Somehow the spec file differs from the spec file inside the src.rpm. I looks like that the standalone spec file contains some more fixes. Please make sure that both match in the next update. ;-) > (In reply to comment #11) > > IMHO having just two packages: > > gpointing-device-settings > > and > > gpointing-device-settings-devel > > would be better. > > DONE Ok, good. > > * pkgconfig file: TODO > > - The pkgconfig file contains the following linker flags: > > Libs: -L${libdir} -lgpointing-device-settings > > which won't work at all, since the library's name is "libgpds.so". Please > > substitute the line with something like this: > > Libs: -L${libdir} -lgpds > DONE Ok. > > * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: TODO > > I'm quite sure that the gpointing-device-settings is the regular configuration > > dialog for the user to setup his mouse/touchpad preferences. Similar as it was > > done in the gsynaptics package it must be available in the Preferences menu: > > e.g. in System -> Preferences -> Pointing Device Settings > > Please add the according .desktop file. > > DONE (.desktop file adapted from gsynaptic) Unfortunately there is an icon referenced ("touchpad") which was only provided by the gsynaptic package and so it is missing in the menu entry. Probably we can use either another icon provided by one of the base packages or we can add the icon from the gsynaptic package as a separate source to this package. Additionally desktop-file-validate complains about some problems: desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop: warning: value "GNOME;Application;Settings;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" > > * Obsoletes: TODO > > - Obsoletes: the version must be greater than the version of the current > > package, otherwise the current gsynaptics pacakge would not be obsoleted > > Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.16-2 > > > DONE You have used: Obsoletes: gsynaptics <= 0.9.17 IMHO this should be: Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.17 ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages ) > > * Scriptlets: TODO > > - gconf: please adjust the GConf scriptlets according to > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GConf > DONE OK. The package looks now quite good and there are only some very minor issues left. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222208.n8MM89V0003331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-22 18:08:08 EDT --- Thanks, I've contacted the author. I did look in source for a license somewhere but clearly not well enough. Sure I did a recursive grep for "license" but clearly badly. Steve Sorry for the double submit, was a really bad wireless. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222206.n8MM6uWk003079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-22 18:06:56 EDT --- toppler.i586: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/toppler 02755 toppler.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/toppler 0775 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings The binary is setgid games to write to the highscores file. The highscores dir needs to be group writable to allow file creation from the binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222206.n8MM6366002652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-22 18:06:01 EDT --- Alex, could you please make an unofficial review of this small package ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 I just want to see if you understood the basic RPM packaging. However your package looks good, I just need some time to verify the examples included. I'm looking forward to add avra on the FEL 12 Livedvd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222224.n8MMObuI008123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 18:24:36 EDT --- python-markdown2-1.0.1.13-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222224.n8MMOgZt001492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.1.13-3.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222226.n8MMQ72g002381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #4 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-22 18:26:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Fix them and I can approve this. Everything has been fixed. I've added the scriplets for update-desktop-database I don't have an x64 system so I can't test the launcher script but I think it's working right. Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chronojump.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-11/chronojump-0.8.10-2.olea.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222225.n8MMPKcg002048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Colin Coe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Colin Coe 2009-09-22 18:25:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: editarea Short Description: A replacement for the HTML textarea tag Owners: coec Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: coec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522245] Review Request: vdpauinfo - Tool to query the capabilities of a VDPAU implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222225.n8MMPhFf002179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522245 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-09-22 18:25:41 EDT --- Thx for the review, I'm closing this bug for now, as Rawhide build is done. Building for F-10 and F-11 will be possible on next push (so libvdpau will be available in the buildroot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222227.n8MMR9oW009246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 22:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222253.n8MMroCD017504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 18:53:47 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. You have "License: GPLv2" but nowhere do I see a version of the GPL specified. According to the GPL text itself (section 9) we can choose any version we like. This means that the license is GPL+. Or do you see any language in the code or documentation which specifies "version 2 only"? BTW, if you're going to require a recent rpm by leaving out BuildRoot:, you might as well drop the rpm -rf at the start of %install. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: a0f95ec12eb2a986774bf7f6738925ccb9ee588ae99d1fa7a771bd1d07676ab1 nss_updatedb.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. X license field does not seem to match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: nss_updatedb = 10-1.fc12 nss_updatedb(x86-64) = 10-1.fc12 = libdb-4.7.so()(64bit) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directory it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] New: Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Summary: Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phrkonaleash at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp.spec SRPM URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp-0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The MXP library implements the parser for the MUD eXtension protocol. I need this included in Fedora so that I can get kmuddy (http://kmuddy.com) included. Need a sponsor, will solicit Fedora KDE SIG for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222304.n8MN4q9U020811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222305.n8MN5jIr021336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-22 19:05:44 EDT --- Ah, yes, rpmlint output: [rrix at TheSwan rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/i586/libmxp-* libmxp.i586: W: no-documentation libmxp-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. No documentation provided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222317.n8MNHS6m018545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 19:17:27 EDT --- Looks good to me, thanks. APPROVED I've clicked the necessary button in FAS, so you should be able to make your CVS request as soon as that propagates through the system. That generally happens within an hour. Please let me know if you need further assistance getting your package built and pushed out. It's simplest to contact me on IRC in #fedora-devel (tibbs or tibbs|h) but you are also welcome to email me. Also, I note that there are a couple of other perl packages submitted bu Red Hat folks; I checked and it seems as if all three of you are in the docs group. If you know what's going on, or you'd like me to help with that, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222332.n8MNW9uV024482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-22 19:32:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I guess the > following line in %description should be removed Good catch. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: viewnior Short Description: Elegant Image Viewer Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222339.n8MNd2hq000836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-22 19:39:01 EDT --- Do we have such targets in Fedora? Do we have any manpages not gzipped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477542] Review Request: mpdscribble - A mpd client which submits information about tracks being played to Last.fm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222341.n8MNf6uZ027049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477542 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 19:41:05 EDT --- I was cleaning up the sponsorship queue and found this package. Jaroslaw, are you still interested in submitting this package? Peter technically has the ability to sponsor you; I don't know if he gained that within the last six months, but at this point it makes no difference. Peter, Jaroslaw is still in the sponsorship queue (FAS ID jaroslav); did you want to get this moving? What else would be required to force some progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 23:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909222346.n8MNksK9028627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 19:46:51 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 00:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230014.n8N0EXSh005074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-22 20:14:32 EDT --- Added Documentation... Spec URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp.spec SRPM URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp-0.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 00:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230022.n8N0M8Nr014922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-22 20:22:06 EDT --- You need to pass more option to %configure to have the files installed in the proper location. Take a look at the sympa install doc. (--enable-fhs, --with-defaultdir, etc...) You must use macros in the %files section. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros The NVR (name-version-release) in changelog entries must match the actual NVR defined with Name: Version: Release tags. The apache conf, log rotate conf, etc... are not provided in the tarball, but you need to add them to get a fully functional software. The provided initscripts are also not matching the fedora guidelines (default to enabled, no reload target iirc) I ended replacing them. You need to create a sympa user to run all the scripts. You need to create an additional mail alias file, etc... You really should take a look at the specfile and srpm I'm linking in my first comment. It is based on an older version of sympa and still far from perfect, but it will help you get a better idea of what is needed to get both a functional software and a specfile/srpm matching the Fedora guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 00:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230033.n8N0XdP2011565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 20:33:37 EDT --- I'm going to drop this out of the review queue; Andy, please clear the whiteboard if you have a 0.5 package or info on why 0.4 should go in instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 00:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230035.n8N0Z8Z3019450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 20:35:05 EDT --- Folks, I'm going to drop this out of the review queue. Please clear the whiteboard if the issues with this package are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 00:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230042.n8N0gF7O022095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 20:42:12 EDT --- Can you file a ticket against perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree requesting that it be updated to 0.10, and then add that ticket number to the "Depends on" field of this ticket? This package cannot be reviewed until that update is made (because currently the package doesn't build at all). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 01:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230118.n8N1IPrn000735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-09-22 21:18:23 EDT --- taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 01:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230119.n8N1J3oZ000876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 21:19:02 EDT --- Here's some quick review commentary. This builds fine; rpmlint says: python-dmidecode.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 rpm finds the delepdency on libxml2.so.2 itself; there's no need to specify it manually. python-dmidecode.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python This one seems bogus; ignore it. python-dmidecode.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized python extension module to access DMI data Trivial to fix. python-dmidecode.x86_64: W: no-documentation There are several documentation files which should probably be packaged. It is mandatory that you package at least the license file. Source0: should be a full URL to the tarball. If there is no URL where that tarball can be downloaded, where did you get it? Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL. No supported version of Fedora shipped with a python older than 2.5.2; are you sure the %{python_ver} conditional is needed? (Likewise, no supported Fedora version needs a BuildRoot: tag or the rm line at the beginning of %install.) Nothing seems to own /usr/share/python-dmidecode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 01:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230129.n8N1TQtH003924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #7 from Jon Stanley 2009-09-22 21:29:26 EDT --- One thing that I immediately see is that there's no history in this review. What I mean by that is whenever you make a change to the package in support of the review request, you need to bump the release and add a changelog entry. When the package finally gets approved, you then import that version exactly as approved - i.e. don't start over at 1. If it takes four iterations in review, then you would import 0.4.1-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 01:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230143.n8N1hTLb000341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 21:43:27 EDT --- canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 01:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230144.n8N1iVlL008197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-22 21:44:30 EDT --- canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 02:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230230.n8N2U61B022182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #8 from Jon Stanley 2009-09-22 22:30:05 EDT --- Some other random tidbits: The upstream tarball includes a stout.qbrew and a paleale.qbrew as example files of what you can do. It would be most helpful to include these as %doc as well. There's a translation to german in the upstream tarball as well. It doesn't seem to build into a .qm even when I extract the tarball and just manually run ./configure ; make - my l10n-fu is non-existent, though. I can reach out for help on that one if you need it. This is really nit-picky, but the upstream source files don't have consistent headers. Some mention that the license is in the tarball, and others explicitly spell out what the license is. The latter is preferred if you can convince upstream to do that in their next release. Not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 03:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230308.n8N38r30031283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 23:08:51 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Everything else looks fine; really the only thing I can suggest is that your %description should consist of sentences (at least one). Not a sufficiently big deal to hold up this review, though. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 9df45969b9b4ca10779a6cdd72c18347060a90a61f12eecd8918c4609a2466a1 Nagios- Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Nagios::Plugin::Beanstalk) = 0.04 perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk = 0.04-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/env perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Beanstalk::Client) perl(Nagios::Plugin) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Beanstalk) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.07 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.10 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 03:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230343.n8N3hioP031109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mathstuf at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-22 23:43:43 EDT --- I'll take this. Can't sponsor you myself though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 03:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230358.n8N3wBNF001618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-22 23:58:10 EDT --- If you can't sponsor, you can't do the review (at least if you wish to follow the rules we've all been following). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 04:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230410.n8N4Aw5Q011750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-23 00:10:57 EDT --- Alright, opening review again then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 04:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230418.n8N4IbOW006163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 00:18:35 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. Note that a test is skipped because of a missing build dependency (Pod::Coverage). POD coverage is generally a maintainer check anyway, so I don't think it's a big deal, but you run the POD checks so I figured you might want to run the coverage checks too. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 3d69fa8eb97405a6bd398d0d9305a0aaa0f83cfa176a8660ab58674282cc0266 Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::Diff::Parser) = 0.1001 perl(Text::Diff::Parser::Change) perl-Text-Diff-Parser = 0.1001-1.fc12 = perl >= 0:5.00404 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(IO::File) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=58, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.36 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.49 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 04:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524781] Review Request: perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive - Getopt::Long with usage text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230426.n8N4QseY014710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524781 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230507.n8N57r9v022049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 kashyap chamarthy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-23 01:07:51 EDT --- Thanks Jason for reviewing, - Yeah, Licence was a gotcha, now I changed the License in the SPEC file to GPL+ - And removed the rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from %install section updated SPEC and SRPM: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/nss_updatedb.spec http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/nss_updatedb-10-2.fc12.src.rpm Sure, will do package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490353] Review Request: emacs-ecb - Emacs Code Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230523.n8N5NOht024659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490353 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Arun SAG 2009-09-23 01:23:23 EDT --- I see lot of emacs addon's review requests from you, sadly all of your links are broken (404 Not found). Please update accordingly; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230536.n8N5a2vK026939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #26 from srinivas 2009-09-23 01:35:58 EDT --- Implemented the suggested changes. The modified spec and the SRPM available at the following location: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-sfcb/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230538.n8N5clUA027322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 01:38:46 EDT --- So this is just a rename review request? I'll do a quick runthrough. The Obsoletes: and Provides: needed to rename the package look correct according to the guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages. There are a couple of provides which look a bit odd. I think that for some bizarre reason the automatic dependency finder actually parses "package" statements in some verilog source (installed as documentation) as perl "package" statements, and so you end up with the bogus "perl(imp_test_pkg)" and "perl(mypackage)". That's pretty bad behavior from rpmbuild almost certainly worthy of a bug, but you'll still need to filter those dependencies. Unfortunately you can't use the general dependency filtering mechanism just introduced because this package is arch-specific. Perhaps the mechanism at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides will work for you. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b3c4c852173beb2bad45f567e9d9e854f8e78150356da66476a3f232a6690f6f Verilog-Perl-3.213.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires: Parser.so()(64bit) Preproc.so()(64bit) perl(Verilog::EditFiles) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Getopt) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Language) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Cell) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::File) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::File::Parser) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Interface) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Logger) = 3.035 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Module) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Net) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Pin) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Port) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Netlist::Subclass) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Parser) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Preproc) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::SigParser) = 3.213 perl(Verilog::Std) = 3.213 ? perl(imp_test_pkg) ? perl(mypackage) perl-Verilog = 3.213-1.fc12 perl-Verilog-Perl = 3.213-1.fc12 perl-Verilog-Perl(x86-64) = 3.213-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/perl libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.000 perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Struct) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::Dir) perl(IO::File) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Verilog::EditFiles) perl(Verilog::Getopt) perl(Verilog::Language) perl(Verilog::Netlist) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Cell) perl(Verilog::Netlist::File) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Interface) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Logger) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Module) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Net) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Pin) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Port) perl(Verilog::Netlist::Subclass) perl(Verilog::Parser) perl(Verilog::Preproc) perl(Verilog::Std) perl(base) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=26, Tests=354, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.22 usr 0.05 sys + 3.69 cusr 0.65 csys = 4.61 CPU) One test is skipped due to lack of commercial software. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230540.n8N5eY5c020704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 01:40:31 EDT --- Where did the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230551.n8N5pMud029583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 --- Comment #4 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-23 01:51:21 EDT --- Jason, - I forgot to mention, I'm not sponsored yet. - I've also submitted another request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Status: Package APPROVED, but blocked by FE_NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230552.n8N5qW5n029681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mathstuf at gmail.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 01:52:31 EDT --- Well, I can at least take a look. I'll need to go over both packages you've submitted; with luck I'll have some time tomorrow. I note your rpmlint output doesn't match mine: libmxp.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.2-1 ['0.2.2-2.fc12', '0.2.2-2'] The package is release 2 but your last changelog entry is for release 1. libmxp.x86_64: W: no-documentation This is OK. libmxp.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libmxp.so.0.0.3 /lib64/libm.so.6 libmxp is linked against libm but doesn't call any functions in it. This isn't really problematic because any running system is going to have libm in memory anyway. There's a solution at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues if you really care; just hack libtool to pass -Wl,--as-needed to the linker. More review stuff to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 05:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230553.n8N5rw87022831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Arun SAG 2009-09-23 01:53:56 EDT --- #1 Rpmlint on emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm throws emacs-color-theme.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/emacs-color-theme-6.6.0/COPYING Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding #2 Source0 should point to http://ftp.twaren.net/Unix/NonGNU/color-theme/color-theme-6.6.0.tar.gz source0: http://ftp.twaren.net/Unix/NonGNU/color-theme/%{pkg}-%{version}.tar.gz Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Tried installing the rpm it works fine; The following lines were added to .emacs file and i success fully loaded robin-hood theme (require 'color-theme) (color-theme-initialize) (color-theme-robin-hood) I can maintain this package for you if you want; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230606.n8N66EjC025300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|guido.grazioli at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 02:06:12 EDT --- Guido, you cannot approve this ticket; only sponsors can review packages where the submitter needs a sponsor. See the big yellow box at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored Clearing the flags and returning the package to the queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230606.n8N66QBA025338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 02:06:25 EDT --- A package can't be in that state, because reviews of NEEDSPONSOR tickets must be done by a sponsor. In any case, I'm not willing to sponsor you at this time, in part because I don't appreciate not being told up front that you need sponsorship. I'm returning this package to the queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230624.n8N6OACk028438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 02:24:09 EDT --- You have "GPLv2" for the license but all of the source files seem to me to refer to the LGPL and include the "or (at your option) any later version" language. Can you indicate which files are under the GPL, or where the version is restricted to version 2 only? Otherwise I'd say the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". Generally it's a good idea to name patches for their function; in this case I guess that's a gcc44 compilation fix. Using "foo-fedora.patch" for a patch in Fedora is stating the obvious. Have you sent this patch upstream? Is there an upstream bug number you can refer to? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PatchUpstreamStatus for the guidelines on this. You must include the license file(s) in the main package (which coincidentally will make the no-documentation rpmlint complaint go away). There is no need to also include them in the devel package. Obscuring your email address in the changelog is pointless. Your choice, of course, but still pointless. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 54934b7db14683f5e9499bc3ac023c5e3bca443571963c1683e04fa742a27c7a libmxp-0.2.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field doesn't match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included upstream, but not included in the main package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint (changelog). * final provides and requires are sane: libmxp.so.0()(64bit) libmxp = 0.2.2-2.fc12 libmxp(x86-64) = 0.2.2-2.fc12 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libmxp.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libmxp-devel-0.2.2-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm libmxp-devel = 0.2.2-2.fc12 libmxp-devel(x86-64) = 0.2.2-2.fc12 = libmxp = 0.2.2-2.fc12 libmxp.so.0()(64bit) * shared libraries are installed; ldconfig called properly. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230636.n8N6ae7e030847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 02:36:36 EDT --- This fails to build for me (x86_64, rawhide). There are many errors and my builder has lots of CPUs so the output is a bit tough to follow. Here's a scratch build; the builders have fewer CPUs so it's a bit easier to follow: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700038 The errors all seem to be of the form: ../../FeLib/Include/save.h:39: error: cast from 'FILE*' to 'truth' loses precision Of course, you can do your own scratch builds, and it's a good idea to do them and include the URLs in your review tickets (to show that your package actually builds). Instructions are in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230645.n8N6jeDC032554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230644.n8N6iog3032060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #16 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-23 02:44:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Somehow the spec file differs from the spec file inside the src.rpm. I looks > like that the standalone spec file contains some more fixes. Please make sure > that both match in the next update. ;-) Yeah, I catched some more last minute issues and forgot to reupload the srpm. > > > > DONE (.desktop file adapted from gsynaptic) > > Unfortunately there is an icon referenced ("touchpad") which was only provided > by the gsynaptic package and so it is missing in the menu entry. Probably we > can use either another icon provided by one of the base packages or we can add > the icon from the gsynaptic package as a separate source to this package. > icon added from gsynaptics > Additionally desktop-file-validate complains about some problems: > desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop > /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop: warning: key > "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated > /usr/share/applications/gpointing-device-settings.desktop: warning: value > "GNOME;Application;Settings;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" > contains a deprecated value "Application" > > Both should be OK now. > You have used: > Obsoletes: gsynaptics <= 0.9.17 > IMHO this should be: > Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.17 > ( > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages Well, that's just an example, both will work just fine. Anyway, I removed it. http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings.spec http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230649.n8N6nAeA007246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-23 02:49:08 EDT --- perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 06:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524698] Review Request: perl-Yahoo-Marketing perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230650.n8N6oBD4007629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524698 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 02:50:10 EDT --- I can't find any Fedora account matching your name; do you have one? Please post a link to your spec file. Requiring that we unpack an src.rpm just to look at it restricts the number of useful comments you will receive. (There are very many packages to review, so making it difficult on the reviewers means you just won't receive a review.) If this is your first package, I really suggest you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers, follow the instructions there, and fix up this ticket to match the expected format for review tickets. In general it is expected that anyone who submits a package will maintain it for Fedora. The only exceptions I know of are for things that are present in the Python versions in all supported Fedora releases but not in the old versions in RHEL and other similar situations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230700.n8N70DAE009645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #6 from Stjepan Gros 2009-09-23 03:00:11 EDT --- Ok, I'll contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230707.n8N77SLJ003916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 03:03:35 EDT --- Have you done any security review of this package to determine whether it properly handles its setgid privileges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230710.n8N7A9Wv005315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-23 03:10:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > APPROVED Thanks, Jason. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Diff-Parser Short Description: Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230716.n8N7GMna012893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 --- Comment #2 from Filippo Argiolas 2009-09-23 03:16:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > #1 Rpmlint on emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm throws > emacs-color-theme.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/emacs-color-theme-6.6.0/COPYING > #2 Source0 should point to > source0: http://ftp.twaren.net/Unix/NonGNU/color-theme/%{pkg}-%{version}.tar.gz Ok, everything should be fixed now. Check the new files in http://people.freedesktop.org/~fargiolas/emacs-color-theme-fixed/ > I can maintain this package for you if you want; Sure, if you already have packager privileges, go ahead. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230724.n8N7OLwo014150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 03:24:19 EDT --- I guess packages don't get much simpler than this. It looks functionally equivalent to the existing iwl5000-firmware package; since the licenses are exactly the same I'm going to assume that everything is OK there. This package, like the other firmware packages, have no dependencies. I'm going to assume that's OK as well, and that weird install-time ordering won't somehow cause this package to be installed before udev (or if that nothing suffers if that does manage to happen). I haven't the hardware to test this, but I'm sure if anything doesn't work, it wouldn't be due to the trivial packaging. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 7e81ddad18acec19364c9df22496e8afae99a2e1490b2b178e420b52d443728d iwlwifi-1000-ucode-128.50.3.1.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is acceptable for firmware. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: iwl1000-firmware = 128.50.3.1-1.fc12 = (none) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230752.n8N7qgTU013586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros 2009-09-23 03:52:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > For 1.2.4-2: > > * License > - As info files and files under doc/ are under GFDL, the license > tag should be "GPLv3+ and GFDL". Fixed. > * %description > - You don't have to duplicate the same %description into -doc > subpackage. Fixed. > * Conditional BR (BuildRequires) > - INSTALL file says: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 140 - User Option: -with-readline[=yes|no] > 141 - User Option: -without-readline > 142 Enables/disables the GNU Readline support for `mixvm'. If the > 143 required libraries are missing (*note Requirements::) the > configure > 144 script with automatically disable this feature. > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > From configure.in, to enable readline support both > "ncurses-devel" and "readline-devel" is needed for BR. > Currently build.log says: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 194 checking for initscr in -lncurses... no > 195 configure: WARNING: Cannot find ncurses lib > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Would you enable this option? Added in BuildRequires ncurses-devel and readline-devel > > * Parallel make > - Support parallel make if possible. If parallel make fails, please > write a note about that on the spec file: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make Parallel make doesn't work for this package. I added comment to make. > * About mdk.desktop > - The category "Application;" is deprecated and should be removed. > - The Category line should end with semicolon, i.e. with > "...Emulator;GTK;" . Fixed. > * Timestamps > - Please consider to use > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. > This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent > autotools. Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/mdk/mdk-1.2.4-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230756.n8N7u1qd020052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-23 03:56:00 EDT --- All the setegid magic is handled in highscore.cc and it seems to be fine to me. games privileges are dropped very early and are only used to write to the highscores file after. I'm no expert though, and another pair of eyes couldn't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230754.n8N7sDIh013947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 03:54:12 EDT --- imported and built yesterday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230754.n8N7sE7v013973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523884, which changed state. Bug 523884 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 08:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230859.n8N8xQ0s003414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-23 04:59:23 EDT --- Sorry for the overhead, i thougth the fe-needsponsor flag implied my review being informal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 08:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230859.n8N8xpVD003519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #7 from David Sommerseth 2009-09-23 04:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I see you removed the NEEDSPONSOR blocker, but I can't find your name in the > account system. It's not "davids" and a search on "Sommerseth" finds nothing. Ahh sorry! I thought that Jussi Lehtola forgot to do that when answering. My mistake! > What's your FAS ID? It should be dsommers > I downloaded and unpacked the src.rpm linked above, but it doesn't seem to > match the spec file linked above. Whenever you make a change to a package > under review, you should increase Release:, generate a new package and update > both that and the spec file. Otherwise it quickly becomes difficult for any > prospective review to keep things straight. There are far more submissions > than reviewers, so making it difficult for reviewers is not a good idea. Again, I'm sorry for making a mess here. Anyhow! A new release if imapfilter has surfaced, so I've updated spec files and built a new src.rpm. Hopefully things are more consistent now. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter-2.0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm You made me aware of rpmlint in another bz ... so I did run rpmlint on spec file, src.rpm and binary rpms. But there is one thing which I'm not able to fix ... imapfilter.src:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec imapfilter.spec:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec I believe this is because the configure script is not autotools based. I've made a comment about it in the .spec file. I did however reduce this warning to only appear once in each file and not twice, by renaming the ./configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 09:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] New: Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.src.rpm Description: This module implements a FIFO queueing infrastructure, using a directory as the communications and storage media. No daemon process is required to manage the queue; all communication takes place via the filesystem. $ rpmlint SPECS/perl-IPC-DirQueue.spec \ RPMS/noarch/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm \ SRPMS/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji builds for el4, el5, f10 and f11 respectively. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700288 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700294 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700299 and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700296 Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 09:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230932.n8N9W1XD005083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #2 from David Sommerseth 2009-09-23 05:32:00 EDT --- Thank you for your review! A new src.rpm and spec file is available: Spec URL: http://projects.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/export/66ddffc29a5a99f847a8ec8f76f1adbe37c481f6/contrib/python-dmidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://src.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode-3.10.7-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint gives now no warnings or errors at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 09:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230933.n8N9XaWs005358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Alex Musolino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musolinoa at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-23 05:33:34 EDT --- Hi Shakthi, I have a few comments: - The versioned shared libraries should not be in the devel package as they are required by the snacc binary itself. (The *.so symlinks, however, should remain in the devel package). - The *.ans1 files are also required by snacc and so should be moved out of the devel package. - Some of the documentation (*.tex and *.bib) refers to the c-lib and c++-lib APIs (these should go in snacc-devel) and some refer to the use of various binaries in the snacc package (these should go in snacc). - The C/C++ examples should go in devel package (they aren't being packaged at the moment). - The C/C++ header files for the c-lib and c++-lib should go into the devel package. - There's a spelling mistake in the description (s/dample/sample/). Another idea might be to create libsnacc and libsnacc-devel packages for the c and c++ libraries and put just the binaries in snacc. In fact, I think this would be the optimal solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 09:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230934.n8N9YwkP005532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 --- Comment #3 from David Sommerseth 2009-09-23 05:34:56 EDT --- Just a comment in regards to the Python check against older versions than 2.5. This package is also being built on RHEL4 and RHEL5, which ships Python 2.3 and 2.4. That's the reason for this check, as we want to try to avoid maintaining a separate .spec file for RHEL. Is this going to be a problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 11:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459872] Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231116.n8NBG6Li003268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-23 07:16:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Just going back over some of these older tickets. I wonder it is permissible > for us to distribute the sources of those sample files that you have to > explicitly not include in the package due to licensing restrictions. Actually, these messages are just a leftover from my experiments (I tried to download these files and plan to add them to the tarball before realizing that this is illegal). Yes, we able to distribute srpm, since it doesn't contain non-redistributive stuff. Ok, returning to this ticket: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/asn1c-0.9.21-4.fc11.src.rpm I just removed confusing messages about asn1-files, which are not present in tarball and cannot be redistributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 11:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231130.n8NBUMkp006017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-23 07:30:21 EDT --- Hello, I'm not in the packager group yet and so I cannot approve your package. Nor can I be your sponsor. I'm just trying to review. Here are my suggestions: the %{?_smp_mflags} is useless as the makefile doesn't interpret it The string.h patch should probably go upstream. Here are some other issues from the Review Guidelines that I've found applicable: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] ciso-debuginfo.i586: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] Some typos: Patch instead of Pach and the description might sound better like this: A small tool to compress/decompress ISO to/from CSO (Compressed ISO for PSP) # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] Also: I could transform an iso to cso and back again, but I don't know how to test that the CSO isn't corrupted. Good luck! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 11:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231145.n8NBjqQe008997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 07:45:49 EDT --- Thanks, Tim! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-lunit Short Description: Unit testing framework for Lua Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 11:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231148.n8NBm6v5009530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 07:48:05 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lua-json Short Description: JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 11:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524605] Review Request: gtrayicon - Generic tray icon for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231158.n8NBwKWb012471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524605 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-23 07:58:18 EDT --- I don't know. :) But that's the point. I don't like to make too many assumptions if not necessary. If Fedora decided to change the compression format, the spec file would have to be adapted. Why not just avoid that by changing a few characters? However, I'm still familiarizing with Fedora packaging. If you say the explicit .gz suffix is fine then it is. To me at first glance, it's an inconsistency because the automatic compression is a transparent action and one should not rely on specific results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 12:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231231.n8NCV7S9012576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-23 08:31:05 EDT --- Hi Tibbs, thanks for the review. I've clarified the description a bit. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk Short Description: Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231312.n8NDCuBK028801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491088] Review Request: rhncfg - Red Hat Network Configuration Client Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231313.n8NDD0BS028907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491088 Bug 491088 depends on bug 490438, which changed state. Bug 490438 Summary: Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231312.n8NDCxSQ028886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Bug 481668 depends on bug 490438, which changed state. Bug 490438 Summary: Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524558] Review Request: rhnsd - Red Hat Network query daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231312.n8NDC1DE031985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524558 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:17:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231317.n8NDHKBf000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-23 09:17:19 EDT --- rhn-client-tools is approved and built. I suppose this review can be approved - Dennis? Also, if Mike is not interested in this review any more, I can take over. Mike? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231318.n8NDIeFu000990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231323.n8NDNm4R031434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #9 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-23 09:23:46 EDT --- I've updated the specfile and RPM a) with a reconstructed revision history; and b) to include the example .qbrew files in %doc. I browsed through the Makefile, but I couldn't figure out what it was doing or supposed to be doing with the qbrew_de.ts file, so I'll need some help getting that into the RPM. The other issue I've run into is that qbrew looks for its help files in /usr/share/doc/qbrew/, while they're actually in /usr/share/doc/qbrew-E.V-R, so the Help doesn't work. What's the appropriate way to solve this? Patch the source? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231329.n8NDTEpl003416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #10 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-23 09:29:13 EDT --- Forgot to mention: new SRPM URL is http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 13:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231355.n8NDtDhs010029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-23 09:55:10 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: log4cpp New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: mccann stevetraylen I contacted the maintainer "William Jon McCann" a couple of weeks back requesting that he maintain log4cpp within EPEL as well. As such no response and as I understand it I am now at liberty to co-maintain the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231404.n8NE4QaL013048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #27 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-23 10:04:22 EDT --- Looks good now. Approved for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231404.n8NE4jS6013194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231406.n8NE6ZBU011770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #28 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-23 10:06:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-sfcb Short Description: CIM server for embedded enviroments. Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231423.n8NENf8B020919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-23 10:23:39 EDT --- approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231433.n8NEXuvR022221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #8 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-23 10:33:55 EDT --- [[You have "GPLv2" for the license but all of the source files seem to me to refer to the LGPL and include the "or (at your option) any later version" language.]] The COPYING file is GPLv2. That's what I based %{license} on.There is also a COPYING.LIB file which is LGPLv2+, so I'm not entirely sure which files are which, or if it's something dual licensed or odd like that. I've marked it LGPLv2+ in the spec. changelog was a bad copy/paste movement. There isn't really an 'upstream' bugtracker to push bugs, it's a one man project and is not a part of kde-extragear or anything like that. kmuddy AT kmuddy DOT com is the contact address. Currently trying to get in contact. SRPM+SPEC updated this afternoon when I'm not on school network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] New: Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 Summary: Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora A public domain curses library for DOS, OS/2, Win32, X11 and SDL, implementing most of the functions available in X/Open and System V R4 curses. It supports many compilers for these platforms. The X11 port lets you recompile existing text-mode curses programs to produce native X11 applications. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/PDCurses/PDCurses-3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/PDCurses/PDCurses.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231447.n8NElL0J027648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #5 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 10:47:19 EDT --- I missed two things; I am addressing them now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] New: Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 Summary: Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mario at information-hq.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter-0.4.9.spec SRPM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/RPMs/CLconverter-0.4.9-2.fc11.i586.rpm Description: It's a simple command-line tool for converting metric to imperial units and vice-versa.Now it supports cm,mm,dm,m,km,inch,mile and yard conversions. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231447.n8NElNAX027729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 Mario Basic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 14:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231453.n8NErrgq029420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231504.n8NF4Lst032729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple at gmail.com |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231505.n8NF5J3B000882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-23 11:05:16 EDT --- Ok, I'll review it shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231515.n8NFFg2b002898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-23 11:15:40 EDT --- I can't find any other issues. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 15:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] New: Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 Summary: Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/ Description: Mpmath is a pure-Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic. It provides an extensive set of transcendental functions, unlimited exponent sizes, complex numbers, interval arithmetic, numerical integration and differentiation, root-finding, linear algebra, and much more. Almost any calculation can be performed just as well at 10-digit or 1000-digit precision, and in many cases mpmath implements asymptotically fast algorithms that scale well for extremely high precision work. If available, mpmath will (optionally) use gmpy to speed up high precision operations. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231617.n8NGHICU022970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #6 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 12:17:17 EDT --- [root at localhost result]# rpmlint *rpm fence-virtd.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-checkpoint.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-libvirt.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-multicast.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. New specfile: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt.spec New SRPM: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm I have not built this in koji/scratch yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231620.n8NGKXsK024113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-23 12:20:32 EDT --- Package doesn't build: ... + rm /users/fedora/src/rpms/BUILDROOT/PDCurses-3.4-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64/libXpanel.so rm: cannot remove `/users/fedora/src/rpms/BUILDROOT/PDCurses-3.4-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64/libXpanel.so': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xmRHkF (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xmRHkF (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231633.n8NGX4h5022231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 12:33:03 EDT --- The version of the COPYING file has nothing to do with the version of the GPL the code is licensed under; the COPYING file itself says that. Similarly, the mere presence of a COPYING file doesn't actually tell you that the code is under GPL. You have to actually look at the source code. In this case, all of the source files have completely unambiguous licensing; you just need to look at them to see which license the code is under. This is something you always have to do when building packages for submission to Fedora (because Fedora really cares about keeping its licensing information correct). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] New: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A command-line issue tracker written in ruby. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] New: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop-1.14.2-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: A command-line option parsing library for ruby. Trollop is designed to provide the maximal amount of GNU-style argument processing in the minimum number of lines of code (for you, the programmer). Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231647.n8NGllnw029886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kmcmartin at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 12:47:44 EDT --- *** Bug 481502 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231647.n8NGlkHo029857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(kmcmartin at redhat. | |com) | --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 12:47:44 EDT --- no response, closing and posting my own package review request *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 525211 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231650.n8NGo71O025709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231650.n8NGo8GV025739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231649.n8NGnESx025314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kmcmartin at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 12:49:11 EDT --- *** Bug 481523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231649.n8NGnDPD025284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(kmcmartin at redhat. | |com) | --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 12:49:11 EDT --- no response for long time, closing in favor of #525210 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 525210 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 16:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231650.n8NGobWd030604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-09-23 12:50:36 EDT --- Odd. Do the solibs it's trying to remove exist in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 17:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231718.n8NHI6Vv004399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 13:18:00 EDT --- I'm not sure if you think this is ready to be reviewed or not, but I did a "quick" build and while there are still 4300+ lines of rpmlint complaints, I can ignore all of the shared-lib-calls-exit and undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings and get something reasonable. coot.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Coot I suggest s/Coot - t/T/ in the Summary:. coot.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6-20090920svn2334 ['0.6-1.20090920svn2334.fc12', '0.6-1.20090920svn2334'] The release changelog entry is missing a "1.". coot.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/coot/create_server.py 0644 /usr/bin/python Is this file supposed to be called by anything? coot-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/coot-0.6/surface/CXXFFTSolventMap.h coot-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/coot-0.6/coot-surface/rgbreps.cc Loads of these; the source code really shouldn't be executable. A quick find/chmod should fix it up. coot-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. It looks like the upstream URL has moved. Otherwise I did a cursory skim over the built packages and everything looks to be in place. I would need to do some testing, but if the above were cleaned up and the licensing checks out then I'd say this package would be pretty close to ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 17:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231722.n8NHMM5f005645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 13:22:19 EDT --- Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package which builds properly in mock or koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 17:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231737.n8NHbBEj007174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 13:37:09 EDT --- Oh, for whatever reason you have privacy set so that a search for your name finds nothing. I see the "dsommers" account is not in the packager group and I don't see any offer to sponsor you in this ticket, so I've readded the NEEDSPONSOR blocker. One thing I note immediately is that this package does not use the proper set of compiler flags. I see you forced "-g"; you really need to pass all of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Don't worry about the "configure-without-libdir-spec" complaint; rpmlint just doesn't understand that your configure script isn't generated by autoconf. There is no need to try and work around bogus warnings at all, and doing so often only adds needless crap to the spec. The point is to address the rpmlint complaints in the review, even if it's just to note that the complaints are erroneous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 17:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231741.n8NHfhVj010456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #18 from Steve Milner 2009-09-23 13:41:40 EDT --- Excellent! I'll make these changes, test, update this BZ and notify upstream of the patch. Thanks Martin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 17:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231756.n8NHuXRN014827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 13:56:32 EDT --- I could review this, but unfortunately I can't test the nautilus integration as I do not use gnome. I'm not sure if it's expected, but it does not seem to work for KDE; the desktop file causes an application/vnd.ms-tnef type to appear, but it has no associated application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231802.n8NI2fO5016576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Adam Goode 2009-09-23 14:02:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: openjpeg New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513779] Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231804.n8NI41cm003161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513779 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 14:04:00 EDT --- Fabian, I don't necessarily agree with what Mads has written above, but I (and I expect many of the other reviewers) would like to see some response to it, if for nothing else than to know that you still wish to submit this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231804.n8NI4Jdg003216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nushio at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #9 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-09-23 14:04:18 EDT --- I managed to build it under Fedora 11, no need for rebuilding mono or anything (Maybe the updated mono packages landed already?) The patches still need a comment on the upstream bug or the reason why they're needed. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment It built on Koji: F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701309 F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701324 What's the status on the PPC / PPC64 rebuild? Sorry for taking so long for the review, I've been really caught up. I think that's the last thing we're missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231814.n8NIEiq4006703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #9 from Sandeep K. Shandilya 2009-09-23 14:14:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm not really a fan of the API: > > extern int netdev_pathname_to_name (char *); > > This modifies the data you pass to it, which is ugly. Something like: This should be fixed. > > In the absence of kernel support, all /dev/net names throw errors. Passing it > the existing /dev/net/tun also errors. This should be fixed. > > It only checks for /dev/net as a prefix. You pass it /dev/foo, or " bar", or > other invalid device names... it returns them. if you pass /dev/foo as a param to the caller the lib will return the same device (/dev/foo/*) to the ioctl call the call will fail. This is the same behaviour without libnetdevname. I dont see why this is a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231816.n8NIGuwp020026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #10 from Sandeep K. Shandilya 2009-09-23 14:16:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > So if I understand what's being done by this code (the git-tree at > http://linux.dell.com/git/development/libnetdevname.git is empty, so I haven't > looked at it much) The new git tree should be up now on http://linux.dell.com/git/libnetdevname.git/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231815.n8NIFi2K019873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-23 14:15:43 EDT --- ==> Thanks for your feedback. - The versioned shared libraries should not be in the devel package as they are required by the snacc binary itself. (The *.so symlinks, however, should remain in the devel package). ==> DONE. - The *.ans1 files are also required by snacc and so should be moved out of the devel package. ==> DONE. Moved to -base package. - Some of the documentation (*.tex and *.bib) refers to the c-lib and c++-lib APIs (these should go in snacc-devel) and some refer to the use of various binaries in the snacc package (these should go in snacc). ==> Since all *.tex files are incleded with snacc.tex file, I have retained it in -devel package. The -base package has the .ps file for snacc user manual. - The C/C++ examples should go in devel package (they aren't being packaged at the moment). ==> DONE. - The C/C++ header files for the c-lib and c++-lib should go into the devel package. ==> They were already in -devel package. They were in /usr/include/snacc/. Now, I have explicitly mentioned them. - There's a spelling mistake in the description (s/dample/sample/). ==> FIXED. Another idea might be to create libsnacc and libsnacc-devel packages for the c and c++ libraries and put just the binaries in snacc. In fact, I think this would be the optimal solution. ==> DONE. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snacc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snacc-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701352 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701418 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701457 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231851.n8NIpdSH028525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #8 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 14:51:38 EDT --- (There's still a delay for the fence-virt spec file update on sourceforge) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231851.n8NIp7VK028429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-23 14:51:06 EDT --- Thanks very much. I'm having a little trouble at the moment, as my address in Bugzilla is different from my FAS address, but I'll get that sorted out. If I have any further drama after that, I'll be sure to take you up on your offer for extra help! :) We're trying (again) to get some of the docs group involved with packaging some of the modules that are relevant to the tools we use -- so these are the other perl packages that you've noticed. We're all (obviously) new at this, so if you wouldn't mind taking a look at Bug 521723 and Bug 521724 as well and let Scott and Ryan know if they're on the right track, we'd all be really grateful :) Cheers Rudi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231850.n8NIouju028382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #7 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 14:50:55 EDT --- New Files: http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt.spec http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/fence-virt/fence-virt-0.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm [root at localhost ~]# rpmlint ~lhh/fence-virt.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The source RPM is from the results of a mock run: [root at localhost SPECS]# mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rebuild /sandbox/lhh/rpm/SRPMS/fence-virt-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.17 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(/sandbox/lhh/rpm/SRPMS/fence-virt-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.17 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.17 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(/sandbox/lhh/rpm/SRPMS/fence-virt-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 57 seconds Rpmlint on the mock results: [root at localhost result]# rpmlint *rpm fence-virtd.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-checkpoint.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-libvirt.x86_64: W: no-documentation fence-virtd-multicast.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Ran this one through Koji --scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 18:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231856.n8NIuO8g029873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #9 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 14:56:23 EDT --- Oops -- sorry; wrong package spin. Here's the correct koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231900.n8NJ0lf7018957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-23 15:00:46 EDT --- dinotrace-9.4a-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dinotrace'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231901.n8NJ18JD031018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #1 from Mario Basic 2009-09-23 15:01:07 EDT --- SRPM URL is: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/RPMs/CLconverter-0.4.9-3.fc11.i586.rpm not: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/RPMs/CLconverter-0.4.9-2.fc11.i586.rpm I don't know if this is the right way to correct this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231907.n8NJ7emO032336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Lon Hohberger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #361571|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-23 15:07:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362340) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362340) fence-virt-0.1.2-1 spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] New: Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: charley.wang at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Eclipse-callgraph.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: C/C++ Call Graph Visualization Tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231918.n8NJIIYj002746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #1 from Charley Wang 2009-09-23 15:18:17 EDT --- Additional information: This is a joint project between myself and Roland Grunberg. It is our first package, and we are in need of a sponsor :) Roland will be posting alternate URLs shortly (i.e. URLs that are not hosted on the Fedora wiki, sorry about that) -Charley -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231915.n8NJF6PU001992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231922.n8NJMqIn004466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 15:22:50 EDT --- approved, please request cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231922.n8NJMD40004279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-23 15:22:12 EDT --- can you please verify if your plugin works under fedora's eclipse 3.5 on rawhide ? The plugins that I package are not loading on eclipse 3.5 ,see bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523928 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231926.n8NJQqBt025575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-23 15:26:51 EDT --- Now I will wait until you get some response from the upstream about gmixvm issue about consuming 100% CPU. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231930.n8NJUH1e007180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231938.n8NJceSm008964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 15:38:39 EDT --- Builds fine and indeed rpmlint is silent. Everything looks fine to me. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: bc53f2c63a2984e3807a0eb8111f0f6b70281d01963a0a7848deedf08dec28af sysv_ipc-0.4.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm sysv_ipc.so()(64bit) python-sysv_ipc = 0.4.2-1.fc12 python-sysv_ipc(x86-64) = 0.4.2-1.fc12 = libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 python-sysv_ipc-examples-0.4.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm python-sysv_ipc-examples = 0.4.2-1.fc12 python-sysv_ipc-examples(x86-64) = 0.4.2-1.fc12 = python-sysv_ipc = 0.4.2-1.fc12 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231936.n8NJaRMP028095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 --- Comment #11 from David Hannequin 2009-09-23 15:36:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac Short Description: Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hvad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 19:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226386] Merge Review: salinfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909231942.n8NJgFt2009953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226386 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 15:42:11 EDT --- This package is no longer in the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232009.n8NK9aOV003446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 16:09:35 EDT --- Spec and SRPM links are 404; please clear the whiteboard when you have a package ready for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232014.n8NKE2tW004766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Roland Grunberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrunber at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Roland Grunberg 2009-09-23 16:14:01 EDT --- Updated URLs to the Spec, and SRPM files : Spec URL : http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/Eclipse-callgraph.spec SRPM URL : http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/Eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: C/C++ Call Graph Visualization Tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232022.n8NKMAZL019013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 16:22:09 EDT --- Build failed for me in mock (x86_64, rawhide): + cp -pr 'doc/build/*' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-mpmath-0.13-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/share/doc/python-mpmath-doc-0.13 cp: cannot stat `doc/build/*': No such file or directory Failed koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701795 Please clear the whiteboard when you have a buildable package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232032.n8NKWAc1021614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #19 from Steve Milner 2009-09-23 16:32:09 EDT --- eaca5f1b0ad2d776341cc7af8dfac834e8df7163 ncrack.spec 4575eee604f1c6ff01ee2cd03b5ee6e570b30a8a ncrack-0.01-0.5.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-0.5.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232038.n8NKcSd0023210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 16:38:27 EDT --- This faile to build for me earlier in mock on 86_64 rawhide. checking for X... libraries , headers configure: error: Cannot find required X library; libXaw. PDCurses cannot be configured https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701811 Note that i686 builds OK, but x86_64 fails; something is probably using a hardcoded /lib, which would tend to explain both problems. Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package that builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:40:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232040.n8NKeH23024011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 16:40:16 EDT --- Spec URL above is 404; please fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232043.n8NKhGmI024361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) --- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-23 16:43:12 EDT --- I have just found that there is another package which is in fedora for long time which owns /bin/xls2csv. Therefore could you please rename your binary/manpage to something else during %install. Otherwise it would lead to conflict when somebody installs catdoc package and after that they want to install xls2csv. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts I'm sorry that I forgot to check for this during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] New: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 Summary: Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmccann at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mclasen at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/notification-daemon-engine-slider.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~mccann/packages/notification-daemon-engine-slider-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232051.n8NKpvYe027094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232056.n8NKu3HD016296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-23 16:56:02 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232055.n8NKtv2M016232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-23 16:55:56 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232055.n8NKtUNe016091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady BuildFails | --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-23 16:55:29 EDT --- Ugh, I was missing BR: tex(latex). http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-mpmath-0.13-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232059.n8NKxsrs017577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dyndns - A |Review Request: |dynamic DNS client for the |afraid-dyndns - A dynamic |free service afraid.org |DNS client for the free | |service afraid.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232056.n8NKuxJt016805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-23 16:56:58 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ghc-cgi.src: W: strange-permission cgi-3001.1.7.1.tar.gz 0600 $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-prof-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm ghc-cgi-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-cgi-devel ghc-cgi-prof.i586: W: no-documentation ghc-cgi-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/cgi-3001.1.7.1/libHScgi-3001.1.7.1_p.a The error is expected, and not a problem. Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525192] Review Request: python-mpmath - A pure Python library for multiprecision floating-point arithmetic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232106.n8NL6nS4000461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525192 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-23 17:06:48 EDT --- Scratch koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1701929 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232133.n8NLXOgs027779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:33:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Waiting for > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc10 Just going through some of the TG2 related reviews: both this and https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc11 have been in stable for a while, maybe this package can be built and pushed too? BTW, the spec file BRs python-nose twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232138.n8NLc4So008712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #17 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 17:38:01 EDT --- OK, I just sponsored your application. You can now proceed with the CVS admin request: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests Please let me know if you have any question about using our update system, if you need another package reviewed, or any other question at all, at salimma at fedoraproject.org. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232140.n8NLekUE010252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 --- Comment #11 from William Jon McCann 2009-09-23 17:40:43 EDT --- Sorry for the no-response - seriously overloaded. Feel free to maintain or own the package as you see fit. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232143.n8NLhbQw011068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:43:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > This is built in rawhide, but due to other deps, isn't yet built for any other > targets. Luke, feel free to kick off a build here when you get the other stuff > straightened out. This should be good to go for F-11, as python-repoze-what-plugins-sql should only need being pushed to stable (see bug #479021). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232144.n8NLiCLZ031801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #26 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-23 17:44:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I'm not sure if you think this is ready to be reviewed or not, but I did a > "quick" build and while there are still 4300+ lines of rpmlint complaints, I > can ignore all of the shared-lib-calls-exit and undefined-non-weak-symbol > warnings and get something reasonable. > I've been submitting patches for the non-weak-symbol problems for quite some time without much upstream action. I'll ask again. > coot.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Coot > I suggest s/Coot - t/T/ in the Summary:. > done. > coot.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6-20090920svn2334 > ['0.6-1.20090920svn2334.fc12', '0.6-1.20090920svn2334'] > The release changelog entry is missing a "1.". > oops, fixed. > coot.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/coot/create_server.py 0644 /usr/bin/python > Is this file supposed to be called by anything? > I checked the code, doesn't seem to be. I've taken the shebang line out. > coot-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/coot-0.6/surface/CXXFFTSolventMap.h > coot-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/src/debug/coot-0.6/coot-surface/rgbreps.cc > Loads of these; the source code really shouldn't be executable. A quick > find/chmod should fix it up. > done. > > It looks like the upstream URL has moved. > fixed. > Otherwise I did a cursory skim over the built packages and everything looks to > be in place. I would need to do some testing, but if the above were cleaned up > and the licensing checks out then I'd say this package would be pretty close to > ready. I've been doing some testing here and noticed the biggest problem is during startup that some python modules aren't found. I'll look into this. And yes, this package needs testers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232146.n8NLkNeS012335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #27 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-23 17:46:21 EDT --- Latest build: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-2.20090920svn2334.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232148.n8NLmrjU001013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:48:51 EDT --- According to the spec files, neither TurboGears2 nor python-catwalk requires or build requires the other package. Okay if I remove python-catwalk blocking TG2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524071] Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232149.n8NLn6Bo001127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524071 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 17:49:05 EDT --- When naming prereleases, the date in YYYYMMDD format goes before any tag like "bzr" or "svn": http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I note this package provides lua.so and python.so, which is rather unfortunate. I have no idea what you could do about it. The only dependency filtering mechanism I know of can't be used on arch-specific packages. * source files match upstream (checked out and compared manually). X package version oes not meet guidelines for snapshot packages. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires: ? lua.so()(64bit) ? python.so()(64bit) lunatic-python = 1.0.1-0.1.bzr20090917.fc12 lunatic-python(x86-64) = 1.0.1-0.1.bzr20090917.fc12 = liblua-5.1.so()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232152.n8NLqaSh015292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #19 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:52:34 EDT --- "... and ..." of course -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 21:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232151.n8NLpwn9015138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #18 from Nils Philippsen 2009-09-23 17:51:56 EDT --- I've looked at bug #501576 or bug #503591 and IMO should be closed or not blocking this review. Concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 22:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232215.n8NMFmpE011733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 18:15:46 EDT --- Legal folks, skip down a bit. This builds fine; here's what rpmlint says: CBFlib.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcbf.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 Not a problem. CBFlib-devel.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/CBFlib-devel-0.8.1/doc/.symlinks CBFlib-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/CBFlib-devel-0.8.1/doc/.symlinks CBFlib-devel.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/CBFlib-devel-0.8.1/doc/.undosymlinks CBFlib-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/CBFlib-devel-0.8.1/doc/.undosymlinks Any idea what these are for? Is there any reason to ship them in the package? CBFlib-devel.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/CBFlib-devel-0.8.1/doc/cif_img_1.5.3_8Jul07.dic Lines 2046 and 2099 contain degree symbols and an a ringed A, respectively. A pass through iconv -f iso8859-15 -t utf-8 fixes this up. CBFlib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfcb.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6 CBFlib.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libfcb.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 Neither of these is a particularly big deal. The licensing situation is a bit complicated. Indeed, everything is GPLv2+, but some of it is also LGPLv2+. That would give a license tag of "GPLv2+ and (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)" but you also need to indicate which parts of the code are under which license. The documentation says that you can distribute the cbflib API under the LGPL, but honestly I'm not sure what they consider to be the API. There's also some truly public domain code in there, though I doubt the compiled result preserves any of it uncombined with GPL code. There's also a potentially troubling notice in some code: * The IUCr Policy * * for the Protection and the Promotion of the STAR File and * * CIF Standards for Exchanging and Archiving Electronic Data * * * * Overview * * * * The Crystallographic Information File (CIF)[1] is a standard for * * information interchange promulgated by the International Union of * * Crystallography (IUCr). CIF (Hall, Allen & Brown, 1991) is the * * recommended method for submitting publications to Acta * * Crystallographica Section C and reports of crystal structure * * determinations to other sections of Acta Crystallographica * * and many other journals. The syntax of a CIF is a subset of the * * more general STAR File[2] format. The CIF and STAR File approaches * * are used increasingly in the structural sciences for data exchange * * and archiving, and are having a significant influence on these * * activities in other fields. * * * * Statement of intent * * * * The IUCr's interest in the STAR File is as a general data * * interchange standard for science, and its interest in the CIF, * * a conformant derivative of the STAR File, is as a concise data * * exchange and archival standard for crystallography and structural * * science. * * * * Protection of the standards * * * * To protect the STAR File and the CIF as standards for * * interchanging and archiving electronic data, the IUCr, on behalf * * of the scientific community, * * * * * holds the copyrights on the standards themselves, * * * * * owns the associated trademarks and service marks, and * * * * * holds a patent on the STAR File. * * * * These intellectual property rights relate solely to the * * interchange formats, not to the data contained therein, nor to * * the software used in the generation, access or manipulation of * * the data. * * * * Promotion of the standards * * * * The sole requirement that the IUCr, in its protective role, * * imposes on software purporting to process STAR File or CIF data * * is that the following conditions be met prior to sale or * * distribution. * * * * * Software claiming to read files written to either the STAR * * File or the CIF standard must be able to extract the pertinent * * data from a file conformant to the STAR File syntax, or the CIF * * syntax, respectively. * * * * * Software claiming to write files in either the STAR File, or * * the CIF, standard must produce files that are conformant to the * * STAR File syntax, or the CIF syntax, respectively. * * * * * Software claiming to read definitions from a specific data * * dictionary approved by the IUCr must be able to extract any * * pertinent definition which is conformant to the dictionary * * definition language (DDL)[3] associated with that dictionary. * * * * The IUCr, through its Committee on CIF Standards, will assist * * any developer to verify that software meets these conformance * * conditions. * * * * Glossary of terms * * * * [1] CIF: is a data file conformant to the file syntax defined * * at http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/spec/index.html * * * * [2] STAR File: is a data file conformant to the file syntax * * defined at http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/spec/star/index.html * * * * [3] DDL: is a language used in a data dictionary to define data * * items in terms of "attributes". Dictionaries currently approved * * by the IUCr, and the DDL versions used to construct these * * dictionaries, are listed at * * http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/spec/ddl/index.html * * * * Last modified: 30 September 2000 * * * * IUCr Policy Copyright (C) 2000 International Union of * * Crystallography * This actually seems to be somewhat common-sense; if you wish to make the claim that you can read or parse certain files, you must actually be able to do so. We're used to dealing with things like this in the form of trademarks, but I'm not sure what we do when patents on the file format are involved. Blocking FE-Legal for guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 22:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232226.n8NMQjfu015407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 --- Comment #19 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-23 18:26:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-sfcc Short Description:Small Footprint CIM Client Library Runtime Libraries Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-12 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 22:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232232.n8NMWseB029445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #11 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-09-23 18:32:53 EDT --- I tested it against an AD server and was able to modify group membership and get lists of users. So it seems to really work. I haven't been able to figure out how to do some stuff, but I have just started playing with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 22:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232239.n8NMdMfX031805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 18:39:21 EDT --- I went to review this, but I note that 0.5.17 was released today. Did you want to update your package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 22:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524071] Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232252.n8NMqbNK004094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524071 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 18:52:35 EDT --- the python.so Lua module used to be python.lua, but upstream rewrote it as a C module instead. But really, this package only depends on base Python and Lua. Are you worried that the python.so() Provides: is too generic? (xchat-gnome provides it as well, which I guess could be problematic if we ever have an application that depends on that same .so name) Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lunatic-python-1.0.1-0.2.20090917bzr.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232327.n8NNRWOg004389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 19:27:31 EDT --- Hi Juan, Oops, I forgot to commit and push my latest spec. Due to using the normal mono-nunit, it is now buildable on PPC / PPC64 as well. The rebuild is done a few weeks ago, AFAIR. SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc12.src.rpm Koji F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1702039 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232330.n8NNU94f017666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #8 from Lennart Poettering 2009-09-23 19:30:07 EDT --- Ping. I'd be thanful if someone could do the second review before the freeze! Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232330.n8NNUC8i017715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 19:30:09 EDT --- Thanks, bos, for continuing to push on haskell-platform for f12. We're nearly there. :) I'll fix the tarball permissions before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232331.n8NNVkF8006223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 19:31:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-cgi Short Description: Haskell library for writing CGI programs Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] New: Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 Summary: Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wcohen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi-3.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: PAPI provides a programmer interface to monitoring perform of running programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232344.n8NNifWt023131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-23 19:44:39 EDT --- It shouldn't be hard to detect build failures on x86_64 systems; you have access to the build system so you can do all the builds you like. There's also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers You should also supply an updated srpm so that reviewers can build your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232349.n8NNnggd012404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #21 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-09-23 19:49:39 EDT --- Waiting to hear back from upstream about possible fixes/changes. Will definitely update the bug when I hear something new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232349.n8NNnOaZ024576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-23 19:49:24 EDT --- Why wouldn't that be in kernel-headers, actually? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232348.n8NNmwH8024472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-23 19:48:58 EDT --- PERF_HEAD=`ls /usr/src/kernels/*/include/linux/perf_counter.h|sort |tail -n 1` || exit 1 ln -s $PERF_HEAD perf_counter.h Ew. How often do you expect the ABI to change here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232351.n8NNpaHX013199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-23 19:51:34 EDT --- Michel, AFAICS you did not fix any of the issues I pointed out in comment #7: - rpmlint is not clean - make is not verbose - package doesn't require gnome-panel - ChhangeLog missing from %doc What's going on here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 00:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240059.n8O0xwjC014911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-23 20:59:57 EDT --- Sorry, I am a spanner: Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/per;-IPC/DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm both checked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 01:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240101.n8O11N56003616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-23 21:01:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/rpms/perl-IPC/DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 01:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240104.n8O14jVB016663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-23 21:04:43 EDT --- http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-IPC-DirQueue/perl-IPC-DirQueue.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 02:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240249.n8O2n6Fl004405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 22:49:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Michel, AFAICS you did not fix any of the issues I pointed out in comment #7: > - rpmlint is not clean Not sure what you mean; it is clean here: $ rpmlint /home/michel/Download/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint gnome-applet-window-picker 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/michel/Download/gnome-applet-window-picker-debuginfo-0.5.6-2.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > - make is not verbose > - package doesn't require gnome-panel > - ChangeLog missing from %doc You're right on these; I misremembered having fixed all the TODO list. Updated build will follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 02:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240257.n8O2vGaa006433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #16 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-23 22:57:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Add Requires: gnome-panel > > Uhh, the guidelines have changed recently. This should be a versioned > dependency as described in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires Not sure that is the correct reading. The guideline uses that versioned dependency as an example, and it actually recommended removing the version requirement, once the oldest supported Fedora release exceeds that requirement. In this case, since there is a SONAME dependency that will pull in the correct version of gnome-panel-libs, the correct version of gnome-panel would be pulled in as well (because of the same SONAME dependency between gnome-panel and libpanel-applet) Actually, this exposes a gnome-panel bug: surely gnome-panel should require the same %{version}-%{release} of gnome-panel-libs... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 03:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] New: Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Summary: Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jderose at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jderose.fedorapeople.org/assets/0.1.0/python-assets.spec SRPM URL: http://jderose.fedorapeople.org/assets/0.1.0/python-assets-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The assets package does content-hash-naming (aka URL fingerprinting) so you can use aggressive caching headers without risking that a client might have an out-of-date version of an asset in its cache. If the content changes, the content-hash-name also changes, resulting in a different URL for each bytewise-unique version of an asset. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 03:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240320.n8O3K2Yg011732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-23 23:20:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > something is probably using a > hardcoded /lib, Not quite. My issue originates from the fact that this package's toplevel Makefile.in does not acknowledge libdir (and other *dir's. When having fixed this, other bugs show up: * DESTDIR handling is broken * shared lib without SONAME. IMHO, inacceptable, esp. not for a package which aims at implementing something such kind of essential as a curses library. * Several files from the devel-package conflict/clash with ncurses (MUSTFIX) * The package installs an autoheader generated autoheader as /usr/include/config.h (MUSTFIX). * The devel-package lumps together x11 and sdl libraries. IMO, the x11, sdl and other lib subsets should be split into separate subpackages. * The devel-package likely lacks deps on many other *-devel packages. I haven't tried to check for details, yet. * Shipping static libs. Jon, feel strongly encouraged not to ship them. > Please clear the whiteboard when you have a package that builds. Urgh, what is this? More silly bureaucracy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 03:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] New: Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Summary: Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jderose at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jderose.fedorapeople.org/wehjit/0.1.0/python-wehjit.spec SRPM URL: http://jderose.fedorapeople.org/wehjit/0.1.0/python-wehjit-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: wehjit is a Python library for for building XHTML widgets for web applications and web pages. It encapsulates the XHTML (a Genshi XML template), CSS, and JavaScript for each widget into a plugin. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 03:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240332.n8O3WSfs027771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-23 23:32:26 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: redir New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: itamarjp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 03:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240347.n8O3lhn7031270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-23 23:47:42 EDT --- package builds fine in mock rpmlint output: [mclasen at planemask ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/notification-daemon-engine-slider-*.rpm notification-daemon-engine-slider.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/notification-daemon-engine-slider-0.1.0/NEWS notification-daemon-engine-slider.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/notification-daemon-engine-slider-0.1.0/README notification-daemon-engine-slider.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/notification-daemon-engine-slider-0.1.0/AUTHORS notification-daemon-engine-slider-debuginfo.i586: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package notification-daemon-engine-slider. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. Should probably remove the empty files, or make them nonempty -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240407.n8O47s04002938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-24 00:07:53 EDT --- formal review: rpmlint: see above package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: n/a shared libs: ok bundling: ok directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok, but see about about empty files headers: n/a static libs: n/a shared libs: n/a devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Looks ok. Just take care of the empty files. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240410.n8O4Atxn003675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 00:10:53 EDT --- More serious issues: * /usr/include/xcurses.h contains this: typedef unsigned char bool; This violates POSIX, ISO C etc. c.f. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/stdbool.h.html * /usr/bin/xcurses-config doesn't acknowledge libdir and doesn't filter out system libdirs/includedirs. I'd suggest to replace this script with a pkgconfig wrapper (i.e. to add a *.pc and write an xcurses-config script using this *.pc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240424.n8O4OhFQ025405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:24:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240424.n8O4OkWO025427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-24 00:24:45 EDT --- Verified that all the small glitches reported above have been fixed. The package is good to go in. Fabio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240423.n8O4NwnM005997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:23:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240433.n8O4XKJH027205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:33:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240435.n8O4ZFCc027788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:35:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240431.n8O4VPtO026991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:31:23 EDT --- I'm a little confused here... is Emily no longer the submitter here? Emily: Is it ok with you that srini and praveenp maintain the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240437.n8O4bUbQ009083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:37:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240438.n8O4cFx0009193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:38:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240434.n8O4Y4q2008171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:34:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240439.n8O4dGvQ028646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:39:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240436.n8O4amhr028371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:36:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 229098] Review Request: openjpeg - JPEG 2000 codec library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240440.n8O4eYOd009980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229098 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #52 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:40:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240441.n8O4fICf010074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:41:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240507.n8O57PV2014649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:07:23 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240511.n8O5B1jV002479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:11:00 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240507.n8O57TqL001559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240506.n8O56aTw001361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:06:34 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-mwclient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240511.n8O5BYZ3016155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:11:32 EDT --- nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240513.n8O5DbIK016490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:13:36 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240511.n8O5B7KM016011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.3.20090910svn.fc10 |0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240510.n8O5AHES015767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:10:15 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rekonq'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9826 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240509.n8O59Bni015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:09:09 EDT --- perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Curses-UI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9818 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240511.n8O5Bd95002945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240513.n8O5Dgh2003326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240511.n8O5BSKm002887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:11:27 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-mwclient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240518.n8O5IfHn018213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:18:41 EDT --- php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240516.n8O5Gbi4017784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:16:36 EDT --- rekonq-0.2.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rekonq'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240518.n8O5Ik8S005456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-2.fc10 |1.0.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240517.n8O5HX0e004963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 01:17:32 EDT --- perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Curses-UI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9870 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 05:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240552.n8O5qFQn012704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #10 from Ryan Rix 2009-09-24 01:52:14 EDT --- Fixed license and changelog Spec URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp.spec SRPM URL: http://rrix.fedorapeople.org/libmxp-0.2.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240603.n8O63k1I027684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240604.n8O649c0027764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240638.n8O6cFPu001498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 --- Comment #2 from steve 2009-09-24 02:38:14 EDT --- Thanks, Jason. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sysv_ipc Short Description: System V IPC for Python Owners: lonetwin Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240640.n8O6eN8v021677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 06:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240659.n8O6xmBV005118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Johan De Taeye changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Johan De Taeye 2009-09-24 02:59:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: frepple Short Description: Free Production Planning Library Owners: jdetaeye Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: salimma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240705.n8O75xbF026707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-24 03:05:57 EDT --- approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240704.n8O74tkH026273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #3 from Mario Basic 2009-09-24 03:04:54 EDT --- This is the correct URL for both SPEC nad SRPM. SPEC URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter-0.4.7.spec SRPM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/RPMs/CLconverter-0.4.7-3.fc11.i586.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240723.n8O7NAIH030161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 kashyap chamarthy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kchamart at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-24 03:23:09 EDT --- Hi, here is my /informal/ review, **NOK** - rpmlint output --------------------- [build at f12-alpha SPECS]$ rpmlint python-assets.spec python-assets.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 6) --------------------- Please fix the above.(use consistently either tabs or spaces) OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is GPLv2) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1702920 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha256sum: eef40e4714f019d76bf9ab44c0fe27e3e6ec5980918012caf81b2e3693c78d09 assets-0.1.0.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - The package is not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissible content OK - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage -- No large documentation OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package -- no devel package NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package -- no static package NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK- At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} **NOTE**: I think you can avoid the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" in %install section, if you're building _only_ for F11 and above.(IIRC,this guideline is not /yet/ updated in the packaging guidelines ) OK - All file names in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. Please correct me, if I'm wrong somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240725.n8O7Pgx9010661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 03:25:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > SRPM URL: > http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/RPMs/CLconverter-0.4.7-3.fc11.i586.rpm You posted an URL to a binary RPM. Something, which is pretty much pointless in a package review. You are supposed to post an SRPM URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240737.n8O7bLNI012978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 03:37:20 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firehol-1.273-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240736.n8O7amxs012878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 03:36:42 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firehol-1.273-5.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240738.n8O7c3GR013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523104, which changed state. Bug 523104 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240738.n8O7c2aW013106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 03:37:59 EDT --- Package imported and building http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:37:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240737.n8O7btCU001138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 03:37:54 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firehol-1.273-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240738.n8O7cSMU001208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 03:38:28 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firehol-1.273-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240748.n8O7m9UV015106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk --- Comment #9 from Michal Ingeli 2009-09-24 03:48:08 EDT --- 0.12 is the newest version of perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree and was pushed for testing just now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240749.n8O7n6v1003302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #5 from Mario Basic 2009-09-24 03:49:05 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Srpm/CLconverter-0.4.7-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks, I've got it mixed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240746.n8O7k8LA002920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 03:46:06 EDT --- Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Fixed the doc conflict with ghc-doc like for ghc-network with versioned ghcdocdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240754.n8O7sEgl004419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-24 03:54:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clc Short Description: Very simplistic MUD client for command line usage Owners: elanthis Branches: F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240755.n8O7tov3004912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) | --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-24 03:55:45 EDT --- You are shure? I try check it: # repoquery --whatprovides /bin/xls2csv but nothing found... In what branches you found this conflict? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] New: Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Summary: Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/madwimax.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/madwimax-0.1.1-1.local12.src.rpm Description: madWiMAX is a reverse-engineered Linux driver for mobile WiMAX (802.16e) devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip. These devices are currently supported: * Samsung SWC-U200 * Samsung SWC-E100 * Samsung SWM-S10R (built in Samsung NC-10 netbook) Note that is not kernel module, but rather user-space daemon. Koji builds: F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700668 F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1700717 Rpmlint output: madwimax.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/z60_madwimax.rules - this is a script 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240809.n8O89HNQ020448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 04:09:16 EDT --- Not '/bin/xls2csv' but actually '/usr/bin/xls2csv'. catdoc (in Fedora) includes this file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240814.n8O8E8fr021975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan at seekline.net --- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-24 04:14:07 EDT --- A few comments about the spec file: - Tabs aren't aligned properly - I'm not sure about this comment: # It still required for EPEL5 BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRoot is required on Fedora too or do I miss something? - What about this comment (line 15)? #Requires: - You should write a patch instead of using sed here: # Hack to correct install on 64-bit systems. sed -i ... sed will return 0/no error if it substitutes something or even does nothing but patch will fail if it cannot be applied. With a patch you are on the save side. - The example package only contains 7 CPP files. Maybe you want to pack them into the main package as docs too? What do you think? - I guess it is a typo in the Changelog Fix installation on 54-bit systems. should be Fix installation on 64-bit systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521719] Review Request: pycryptopp - Python wrappers for the Crypto++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240820.n8O8Kb65024335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-24 04:20:35 EDT --- Sure, new version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.17-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240834.n8O8YROq014372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-24 04:34:20 EDT --- Oh, yes /usr/bin/xls2csv there... So, what you think how I should name it? xlsTOcsv convertxls2csv convertXls2csv convertXls2Csv something other? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240833.n8O8XHih014233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #12 from Christof Damian 2009-09-24 04:33:13 EDT --- Same mistake as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643#c7 (wrong pear provide) is fixed now: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.8-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240834.n8O8Yerw014423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #9 from David Sommerseth 2009-09-24 04:34:22 EDT --- Thanks again for a very quick feedback! I've added the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS as requested. In addition I also removed the renaming of the configure script. I hope I haven't missed anything else ... Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter/imapfilter-2.0.11-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240834.n8O8Y2Fw026765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #8 from Christof Damian 2009-09-24 04:33:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Provides: php-pear(doctrine/%{pear_name}) = %{version} > > Shouldn't that be: > > Provides: php-pear(pear.doctrine-project.com/%{pear_name}) = %{version} That is fixed now: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240849.n8O8nfk5017322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-24 04:49:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > Michel, AFAICS you did not fix any of the issues I pointed out in comment #7: > > - rpmlint is not clean > > Not sure what you mean; it is clean here: Please see comment # 7 or run rpmlint on the srpm: $ rpmlint Downloads/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc10.src.rpm gnome-applet-window-picker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (In reply to comment #16) > Not sure that is the correct reading. The guideline uses that versioned > dependency as an example, and it actually recommended removing the version > requirement, once the oldest supported Fedora release exceeds that requirement. I read this different: Since non of the downsides apply to this package, a versioned dep should be used here. However... > In this case, since there is a SONAME dependency that will pull in the correct > version of gnome-panel-libs, the correct version of gnome-panel would be pulled > in as well (because of the same SONAME dependency between gnome-panel and > libpanel-applet) ... I fully agree with you in this special case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240852.n8O8q39F030431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 04:52:02 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 08:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240852.n8O8q9Hv018055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 04:52:08 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240901.n8O91Dw8020086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 05:01:11 EDT --- Well, the version is 1.14, 1.14.2. For 1.14-0: * License - Well README says the license is the same as Ruby, lib/trollop.rb says it is under GPLv2. So the license tag should be "GPLv2" * Redundant macro - Is the definition of %ruby_sitelib needed? * %check - As this gem contains test/ directory, please add %check stage and execute a test program. * Directory ownership issue - The directory %geminstdir itself is not owned by any packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240915.n8O9Fh43023133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 05:15:42 EDT --- Also please see my comments on bug 525211 comment 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240913.n8O9Dl0f022381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 05:13:08 EDT --- Well, as I said in bug 525210, rubygem-trollop is under GPLv2. However this (rubygem-ditz) is under GPLv3+, which is incompatible with GPLv2, so for now this package cannot be distributed. Note that even if rubygem-trollop is under "GPLv2 or Ruby", it is still incompatible with GPLv3+. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Blocking FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240916.n8O9GIYJ003770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) --- Comment #20 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-24 05:16:16 EDT --- convertxls2csv sounds fine. please take in mind that you need to rename man pages too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240921.n8O9LKKi005408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 05:21:18 EDT --- I don't know this package well so for renaming I will leave it to you (convertxls2csv seems fine also for me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240941.n8O9fH3j010537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-09-24 05:41:16 EDT --- Akshay, you need to apply for cvs next http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240948.n8O9mD7f011717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 05:48:11 EDT --- viewnior-0.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viewnior-0.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 09:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240948.n8O9mtt3031467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 05:48:54 EDT --- viewnior-0.7-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viewnior-0.7-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 10:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241006.n8OA6TYY015570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 06:06:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > SRPM URL: Thanks. As you seem to be new to Fedora packaging, let's start with some basic remarks on your package: 1) Fedora *.spec's are supposed to be named .spec. You are using -.spec Please change this. 2) Your *.spec contains hard-coded /usr/bin. Please use %{_bindir} instead. 3) The compilation being applied by your spec doesn't apply the CFLAGS, all packages in Fedora are supposed to use. One way to achieve this with your package is to explicitly set CFLAGS: make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" 4) You are stripping the application in %install. Fedora applications need to be built and installed unstripped. Please remove the "-s" from install. 5) The source files inside of your tarball carry bogus permissions (they are executable). As you seem to be upstream of the tarball, I'd recommend "upstream" to fix this in the upstream tarball. If this should not be applicable, the permissions should be fixed in %build. Hint: Are you familiar with "rpmlint"? If not, please make yourself familiar with it - Though this tool is far from being perfect and occasionally produces bogus warning, it helps avoiding the worst packaging mistakes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 10:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525412] New: Review Request: mediaproxy - NAT traversal solution for compatible SIP-routers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediaproxy - NAT traversal solution for compatible SIP-routers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525412 Summary: Review Request: mediaproxy - NAT traversal solution for compatible SIP-routers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mediaproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/mediaproxy-2.3.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MediaProxy is a distributed far end NAT traversal solution for media streams of SIP calls. MediaProxy has a dispatcher running on the same host with the SIP-proxy and multiple media relays distributed over the network. The media relays work by manipulating conntrack rules in the Linux kernel to create paths that forward the media streams between the 2 SIP user agents participating in the call. Because it avoids to copy stream data from kernel space to user space and back to kernel space like other implementations, MediaProxy can handle much more media streams at a time, limited only to the network interface bandwidth and the Linux kernel network layer processing speed. MediaProxy features secure encrypted communication between the dispatcher and the relays, advanced accounting capabilities using multiple backends, support for any combination of audio and video streams, realtime statistics, T.38 fax support as well as automatic load balancing and redundancy among the active relays. Koji scratchbuild for F-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 10:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241022.n8OAM3b4005667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-24 06:22:02 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 10:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241035.n8OAZTok020881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #3 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-24 06:35:28 EDT --- Shakthi, Two more suggestions from me... - The snacc-libs package should not require the snacc package. - I've realised that it should be 'Sample' - Sample and Neufeld are the names of the creators. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501101] Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241110.n8OBAPFu015674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 --- Comment #3 from Arun SAG 2009-09-24 07:10:23 EDT --- > Ok, everything should be fixed now. Check the new files in > http://people.freedesktop.org/~fargiolas/emacs-color-theme-fixed/ Yes, rebuilt and checked no issues. > Sure, if you already have packager privileges, go ahead. Thank you! I am not a packager yet, waiting for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241108.n8OB85nJ015179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-24 07:08:03 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241111.n8OBBcfQ016004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG 2009-09-24 07:11:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Hi, > any more unofficial reviews you done? I reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241115.n8OBFm7q016809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-24 07:15:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A few comments about the spec file: > > - Tabs aren't aligned properly Tabs aligned properly. Just you use another tab with (see first post). > - I'm not sure about this comment: > # It still required for EPEL5 > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > BuildRoot is required on Fedora too or do I miss something? Yes BuildRoot is obsoleted for Fedora. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > - What about this comment (line 15)? > #Requires: This is atavism. Deleted. > - You should write a patch instead of using sed here: > # Hack to correct install on 64-bit systems. > sed -i ... > > sed will return 0/no error if it substitutes something or even does nothing but > patch will fail if it cannot be applied. With a patch you are on the save side. Yes, there sed behavior is preferred. 1) We must be conditionally apply patch only on 64-bit systems. 2) sed always replace in this string, even if "lib" to "lib". So, it is normal. > - The example package only contains 7 CPP files. Maybe you want to pack them > into the main package as docs too? What do you think? For what? Especially when work to split it was done. > - I guess it is a typo in the Changelog > Fix installation on 54-bit systems. > > should be > > Fix installation on 64-bit systems. Off course. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525432] New: Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525432 Summary: Review Request: openxcap - Fully featured XCAP server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openxcap.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/openxcap-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fully featured XCAP server. An XCAP server is used by SIP SIMPLE clients and servers to manage buddy lists and policy for subscriptions to presence or other type of events published using SIP protocol. XCAP protocol allows a client to read, write and modify application configuration data stored in XML format on a server. XCAP maps XML document sub-trees and element attributes to HTTP URIs, so that these components can be directly accessed by HTTP. An XCAP server is used by the XCAP clients to store data like Presence policy in combination with a SIP Presence server that supports PUBLISH/SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY methods to provide a complete SIP SIMPLE server solution. Koji scratchbuild for F-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241151.n8OBpDJC006940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-24 07:51:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Tabs aligned properly. Just you use another tab with (see first post). I red your first comment and just wanted to encourage you to use "normal" tabs or 8 whitespaces. I guess this not a big problem but why do you want to go a different why than most of the other packages? In a very strict sense this may fell under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_note-5 > > - I'm not sure about this comment: > > # It still required for EPEL5 > > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > > > BuildRoot is required on Fedora too or do I miss something? > Yes BuildRoot is obsoleted for Fedora. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Oh. Haven't noticed that before. Thanks. > > - You should write a patch instead of using sed here: > > # Hack to correct install on 64-bit systems. > > sed -i ... > > > > sed will return 0/no error if it substitutes something or even does nothing but > > patch will fail if it cannot be applied. With a patch you are on the save side. > > Yes, there sed behavior is preferred. > 1) We must be conditionally apply patch only on 64-bit systems. > 2) sed always replace in this string, even if "lib" to "lib". So, it is normal. Then why not write a patch and wrap it with a conditional for 64bit like you already mentioned? This would solve it. I'm not that familiar with this package but what does upstream say about this? Maybe they have the same problem? > > - The example package only contains 7 CPP files. Maybe you want to pack them > > into the main package as docs too? What do you think? > For what? Especially when work to split it was done. Since it is a library the example files may help developers to build against it. But again this is not a problem and I guess up to the packagers freedom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241157.n8OBvmAi027929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 07:57:47 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241157.n8OBvw9w027985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 07:57:53 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241157.n8OBvh9X027890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 07:57:41 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/editarea-0.8.1.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241201.n8OC1Gs8029124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 Jose Pedro Oliveira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt --- Comment #5 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-24 08:01:14 EDT --- Re-opening this ticket as I've a couple of doubts about the this package. Being this a nagios plugin 1) why isn't is called nagios-plugin-beanstalk (maybe splitting the perl module to a subpackage) and 2) installs its script in %{_libdir}/nagios/plugins (requiring the nagios-plugins package) /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241210.n8OCABQb012216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-24 08:10:09 EDT --- Here's my full review. I couldn't find any further issues that need to be fixed. Just a minor suggestion: Personally, I prefer adding the BRs to the subpackage they actually belong to because then it's easier to reproduce the dependencies. So I would move - BR: doxygen => -doc subpackage - BR: python-devel => -python subpackage - BR: pkgconfig => -devel subpackage $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/cmusphinx3-* cmusphinx3-devel.i586: W: no-documentation cmusphinx3-libs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libs3decoder.so.0.0.6 exit at GLIBC_2.0 cmusphinx3-libs.i586: W: no-documentation cmusphinx3-python.i586: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. All warnings are expected and can be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The name sphinx is already in use for a full-text search engine - there are several release series (Sphinx-2, -3, -4, PocketSphinx) - upstream URL is www.cmusphinx.org => cmusphinx3 is a proper name [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - BSD two clause variant (according to COPYING and source headers) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: File(s) containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - COPYING listed in %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ sha1sum sphinx3-0.8.zip* 343af9767342129e1d673423e9bf1a523eff2254 sphinx3-0.8.zip 343af9767342129e1d673423e9bf1a523eff2254 sphinx3-0.8.zip.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703288 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - shared libs are placed in subpackage -libs - ldconfig is called in %post and %postun for subpackage -libs [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... - not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: Files must not be listed more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - building of static libraries disabled [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. symlink libs3decoder.so put in -devel [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - .la files are removed [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - build in koji [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - seems to work as expected - I made some short recordings and they were properly anylized [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - subpackage -libs doesn't require the base package - all other subpackages list the base package as a requirement [+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) should be placed in a -devel pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241224.n8OCO0Zt015324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 08:23:59 EDT --- log4cpp-1.0-4.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4cpp-1.0-4.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476247] Review Request: log4cpp - logging library for c++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241225.n8OCPbGe016090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 08:25:36 EDT --- log4cpp-1.0-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4cpp-1.0-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241227.n8OCR9M2016376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #7 from Mario Basic 2009-09-24 08:27:08 EDT --- Thanks a lot for this, really helped. I used it as a checklist. 1.done 2.done 3.I think I've done this because I had to write CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" to work. When I wrote make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" It would report an error. 4.done 5.done I used rpmlint to check the spec file and package, and now it reports 0 error and warnings. I used rpmlint CLconverter CLconverter.spec to check it. SPEC URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Srpm/CLconverter-0.4.7-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241227.n8OCRBaJ016401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-24 08:27:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Tabs aligned properly. Just you use another tab with (see first post). > > I red your first comment and just wanted to encourage you to use "normal" tabs > or 8 whitespaces. I guess this not a big problem but why do you want to go a > different why than most of the other packages? In a very strict sense this may > fell under > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_note-5 No "most of the other"!!! I tired say about it. There was discussion on this theme - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.packaging/6214/focus=6224 And accordingly it proposed draft guidelines change - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tabs So, until it is not part Guidelines it can not be required. > Then why not write a patch and wrap it with a conditional for 64bit like you > already mentioned? This would solve it. Sed also solve problem. So, I have opposite question - why I should write additionally patch? And what of benefit of it over sed solution?? > I'm not that familiar with this package > but what does upstream say about this? Maybe they have the same problem? No, they have-not. According to mail, he mention about /lib as symlink to /lib64. I don't known what system they use. > Since it is a library the example files may help developers to build against > it. But again this is not a problem and I guess up to the packagers freedom. Thanks. I think external package give more flexibility to user in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241239.n8OCdg3u006936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #30 from IBM Bug Proxy 2009-09-24 08:39:38 EDT --- Kevin, Yes, it is ok with me with many thanks to Srini and Praveen for stepping up. Thanks! Emily -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 12:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241239.n8OCdJYd006837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2009-09-24 08:39:18 EDT --- So it would seem that PDCurses has major, major issues. Not sure how I missed the conflicts with ncurses-devel. Odd. Anyway, IMHO we have no need for another curses implementation in Fedora, ncurses works wonderfully. The only reason I've submitted this is that asciiportal needs it. Given the above, I see three courses of action. 1. Fix the above. Yow. 2. Create an asciiportal package that bundles PDCurses. Since asciiportal builds against PDCurses statically (ick!) and I've not succeeded in getting it to build dynamically yet, this may work. While bundling libs is to be avoided at all costs, I wonder about doing it when there's no intention of putting the lib in Fedora. Food for thought. 3. Port asciiportal to ncurses. Paradoxically, this might be the least work, if it's possbile. Haven't looked into it in any depth, however. Any thoughts on these options? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241312.n8ODCl4Y031634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #3 from William Cohen 2009-09-24 09:12:46 EDT --- perf_counter.h is not expected to change. However, there could be multiple perf_counter.h files. The PERF_HEAD was written so that it would just pick one for the symbolic link. The kernel-headers would be more appropriate. However, kernel-headers doesn't currently include perf_counter.h. Need to get that added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241313.n8ODDcLs031755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #28 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-24 09:13:33 EDT --- Ver. 1.0.1 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm The upstream introduced Tcl, Lua and Ruby bindings. Unfortunately, the "make install" target for these bindings is broken. I'll plan to fix these issues (as well as issue with unused-direct-shlib-dependency) in the nearest future (this weekend or next week, if time permits). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241314.n8ODEimB032042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-24 09:14:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > Tabs aligned properly. Just you use another tab with (see first post). > > > > I red your first comment and just wanted to encourage you to use "normal" tabs > > or 8 whitespaces. I guess this not a big problem but why do you want to go a > > different why than most of the other packages? In a very strict sense this may > > fell under > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_note-5 > No "most of the other"!!! > I tired say about it. There was discussion on this theme - > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.packaging/6214/focus=6224 > And accordingly it proposed draft guidelines change - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tabs > So, until it is not part Guidelines it can not be required. You pointed to the right discussion and if you read the last few posts you will see my point of view. > > Then why not write a patch and wrap it with a conditional for 64bit like you > > already mentioned? This would solve it. > Sed also solve problem. So, I have opposite question - why I should write > additionally patch? And what of benefit of it over sed solution?? Like I already said e.g. if a new release is made available extra attention should always go to the sed line because sed my return without an error even when it didn't change a single bit. A patch would automate this. It would fail and raise an error. What about the next ten upstream releases? If they change the line e.g. from install(TARGETS net7ssh LIBRARY DESTINATION lib) to install(TARGETS net7ssh LIBRARY DESTINATION LIB) your sed section wouldn't fail and build fine e.g. on PPC. But then you should really make sure that you tested your package on every supported architecture. I'm not sure if it's worth that. If you submit your package to koji and automatically build for all supported architectures then koji would raise an error for 64bit. I would say it is more clean. But that's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241327.n8ODRBB1003593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-24 09:27:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You pointed to the right discussion I known :) > and if you read the last few posts you will see my point of view. You also known my point. I think its all now. I do not see any problem change tab width if you want in any editor what you like. I think you favorite editor can do it. If not, I wrote little script for that on PHP: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/tab-convert.phps Yo may use it like: $ cat ne7ssh.spec | ./tab-convert.php > x11vnc.spec.spaces Or, with power of UNIX-WAY, off course directly in shell f.e: $ cat ne7ssh.spec | php -r 'define("TAB_WIDTH", 5);foreach(file("php://stdin") as $l){preg_match_all("/\t+/", $l, $m, PREG_OFFSET_CAPTURE);foreach($m[0] as $mm){$l = str_replace($mm[0],str_repeat(" ", (TAB_WIDTH - ($mm[1] % TAB_WIDTH)) + ( TAB_WIDTH * ( strlen($mm[0]) - 1 ) )), $l);}echo $l;}' > ne7ssh.spec.spaces > Like I already said e.g. if a new release is made available extra attention > should always go to the sed line because sed my return without an error even [snip] > I'm not sure if it's worth that. If you submit your package to koji and > automatically build for all supported architectures then koji would raise an > error for 64bit. I would say it is more clean. But that's up to you. Yes, there no problem in any case, because koji build fails in case if something changed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241330.n8ODUxCE022702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #6 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-09-24 09:30:58 EDT --- I thought about calling it nagios-plugin-beanstalk, but it still is a perl Module, all files are perl scripts. Creating a subpackage seemed unnecessary bloat to me, especially since the main package wouldn't work without the subpackage. As for point 2, that makes sense, I'll adjust the location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 13:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] New: Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum Alias: yum-rhn-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Summary: Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: This yum plugin provides support for yum to access a Red Hat Network server for software updates. rpmlint is silent Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703680 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241405.n8OE5MC3013369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 10:05:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Any thoughts on these options? Which parts of PDCurses does asciiportal actually need? Theoretically, all curses implementations should be (more or less) compatible, so porting asciiportal to ncurses would be another option, i.e. I would definitely prefer your option 3). Wrt. 1): Fixing the Makefile.in irons out many of the issues mentioned above, however there are parts, I don't see any way to fix, in particular the SDL bindings (IMO, they are a flawed, immature design. Upstream PDcurses was right in not integrating them into their "nominal" configuration) 2) is a non-go/no-way, non-option to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241424.n8OEOaiW017847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #7 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-24 10:24:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I thought about calling it nagios-plugin-beanstalk, but it still is a perl > Module, all files are perl scripts. Creating a subpackage seemed unnecessary > bloat to me, especially since the main package wouldn't work without the > subpackage. So are several of the core nagios-plugins and they were all splited in subpackages using names in the nagios-plugins namespace. This makes a lot easier to locate nagios-plugins (core and third-party) doing something like "yum search nagios-plug" Besides, this package main purpose is to provide a nagios plugin. > As for point 2, that makes sense, I'll adjust the location. You can try this: %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor INSTALLSCRIPT=%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins although this can cause problems with possible man pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525146] Review Request: PDCurses - Public Domain curses library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241445.n8OEjr9Y010624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525146 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-09-24 10:45:52 EDT --- I agree that 3 is best and 2 is awful. I just put 2 out there since it is technically possible. Re 1 and 3, is is the SDL bindings that are the critical part, and, AFAICT, the reason PDCurses was selected of ncurses. I'm not aware of any ncurses SDL bindings. In a few cases in my own code, where I need both, I just use both, for instance I've written but not yet released a game using ncurses and SDL_mixer. I think 3 would basically mean porting the PDCurses SDL bindings to ncurses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241447.n8OElrL8011043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 10:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > 3.I think I've done this because I had to write CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" to > work. When I wrote make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" It would report an error. make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" CLconverter would have been it. > 5.done You seem to have rebuilt the tarball without incrementing the version. A reasonable upstream increments the version each time it releases a new tarball, because people are checking tarballs for changes and will yell at you when a tarball is being replaced without incrementing the version. BTW1: Did you consider to add a Makefile to your package? It would help packagers of various distros and OSes, and assist them to avoid having to figure out how your package is supposed to be built. BTW2: Do you have another package on review? Based on this package review alone, I am not yet sufficiently convinced about your packaging expertise to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241456.n8OEujed026077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 --- Comment #2 from Jason Gerard DeRose 2009-09-24 10:56:44 EDT --- Oops, not sure how that got in there. Fixed and uploaded to fedorapeople. Also fixed in python-wehjit.spec. Thanks for catching this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 14:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241458.n8OEwwRh013761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 10:58:56 EDT --- #001: the following should be in the %prep section aclocal autoconf automake -a # Fix up encoding of documentation dos2unix -k AUTHORS iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 README -o README.new touch -r README README.new mv README.new README # Unpack include files unzip AVR000.zip -d include # Fix permissions and encoding of examples chmod 644 Example/* dos2unix -k Example/* #002: %doc For example, do the following %doc Example instead %doc Example/* This will preserve the examples in a separate directory and not mixing it with other files #003: use %{_datadir} macro instead of /usr/share #004: Directory ownership in %files, add %dir %{_datadir/%{name}-%{version} #004: Preserve timestamps during make install process by adding INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" to your make install Also add "-p" to your install -m 0644 *.inc ..... #005: Add a small on %description stating that fedora also ships some deviced definition *.inc files in %{_datadir/%{name}-%{version}. It will be helpful to the user -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241513.n8OFDIlk030106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 William Jon McCann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from William Jon McCann 2009-09-24 11:13:17 EDT --- Ok updated to fix the empty files. Requesting cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241509.n8OF9Teo029006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-24 11:09:27 EDT --- Review ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines (PHP) - package meets packaging guidelines (PHP) - license (LGPLv2+ and MIT and BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (53d644dd56fbe58056ba33ff42a58482c86f330e92c9aceefdd86788171a1da2) - package compiles on devel (noarch) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241514.n8OFE6FO017510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #8 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-09-24 11:14:05 EDT --- IIRC packages can no longer be noarch when they install files under %{_libdir} (/usr/lib | /usr/lib64). You may need to add this to the specfile: # No binaries in this package %define debug_package %{nil} /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241516.n8OFGCOL031110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241522.n8OFMpme019697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 11:22:49 EDT --- Anyone want to step in for "alternatives" http://dailypackage.fedorabook.com/index.php?/archives/6-Wednesday-Why-The-Alternatives-System.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241542.n8OFglpr005854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 11:42:46 EDT --- #001: move the contents of the -lib subpackage to the main package. The -lib subpackage is meant for multilibs hence support multiarchitectures. IF you want to keep the -lib subpackage you will need to 1. add a require N-libs-V-R to the base package 2. move the binaries to the -libs package 3. make the base package a noarch I prefer to eliminate the -lib subpackage entirely. #002: Documentation: *.tex and *.bib are pretty useless and inefficient for the user. I propose to build a PDF out of it in the %prep section and ship only the PDF and not the sources. For best practices, all documentations of the same package should be provided by the same package. This helps the user find the documentation quickly and efficiently. #003: Directory ownership in base package %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/ #004: .m4 should this go to -devel ? %{_datadir}/aclocal/snacc.m4 #005: Patches naming should start with a %{name} prefix, if not they will overwrite other patches with the same name. FYI: automake17 is provided by Fedora to maintain compatibility with own software. The last real update of automake17 on Fedora is back in 2007. It is recommended for upstream to tune their sources with respect to the newer versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241545.n8OFjK9n025227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #12 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-24 11:45:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fence-virt Short Description: Pluggable Virtual Machine Fencing Owners: lon Branches: F-12 InitialCC: fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 15:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241559.n8OFxZLc028028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 --- Comment #3 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-24 11:59:34 EDT --- Jason, thanks. yes, rpmlint is clean now. On a side note, even I'm new to packaging. As you may already be aware of, only a registered sponsor can approve/review "officially" the first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241601.n8OG1aAP010081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 --- Comment #4 from William Jon McCann 2009-09-24 12:01:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: notification-daemon-engine-slider Short Description: The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon Owners: mccann Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241608.n8OG875e011427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #13 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-24 12:08:06 EDT --- Strange; I've had fedora CVS package commit access for some time, yet I can't set fedora-cvs? ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241621.n8OGLYhG014370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 12:21:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > So this is just a rename review request? I'll do a quick runthrough. Yes it is just a rename review request. > > The Obsoletes: and Provides: done > > There are a couple of provides which look a bit odd. I think that for some > bizarre reason the automatic dependency finder actually parses "package" > statements in some verilog source (installed as documentation) as perl > "package" statements, and so you end up with the bogus "perl(imp_test_pkg)" and > "perl(mypackage)". That's pretty bad behavior from rpmbuild almost certainly > worthy of a bug, but you'll still need to filter those dependencies. > Unfortunately you can't use the general dependency filtering mechanism just > introduced because this package is arch-specific. Perhaps the mechanism at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Filtering_Requires:_and_Provides > will work for you. done > > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. I'm doing my package reviews regularly :) Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-Verilog-Perl-3.213-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241623.n8OGNd3s000657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 12:23:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241624.n8OGOqBc000803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell. | |com) | --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2009-09-24 12:24:50 EDT --- > Matt, the 'libLinux_NFSv3SystemConfigurationUtil.so' should be in > %{_libdir}/cmpi/ too? yes. All CMPI plugins should be in /usr/%{_libdir}/cmpi/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241626.n8OGQXJf015397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 12:26:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241625.n8OGP4Rx015122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 12:25:03 EDT --- Thanks! cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241627.n8OGRI6j001646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 12:27:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241628.n8OGS8S8001768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 12:28:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241634.n8OGYJNd016745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-24 12:34:18 EDT --- I just noticed that you can drop %attr(0755,root,root) from %attr(0755,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/_sphinx3.so because it's applied automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241637.n8OGbiPA017581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 12:37:43 EDT --- for desktop-file-install, just add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522747] Review Request: skrooge - Personal finances manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241636.n8OGaJKu003715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522747 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 12:36:18 EDT --- This is built and in the repos, I think we can close this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241640.n8OGeQo2004717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-24 12:40:24 EDT --- quick update: since this is a technical/legal overlap, spot and ajax will look at it together. adding ajax to CC. spot tells me ajax will not have time to check it out immediately; that's fine, there's no big rush (though for selfish purposes i'd like to be free from the hassle of maintaining it in my own repository asap :>) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241638.n8OGcxZt017890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 12:38:58 EDT --- I can take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] New: Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Summary: Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/geda-gaf.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/geda-gaf-1.5.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The GPL Electronic Design Automation (gEDA) project has produced and continues working on a full GPL'd suite and toolkit of Electronic Design Automation tools. These tools are used for electrical circuit design, schematic capture, simulation, prototyping, and production. Currently, the gEDA project offers a mature suite of free software applications for electronics design, including schematic capture, attribute management, bill of materials (BOM) generation, netlisting into over 20 netlist formats, analog and digital simulation, and printed circuit board (PCB) layout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241645.n8OGjBBR019504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-24 12:45:09 EDT --- We have no guidelines for nagios plugins, so the perl naming guidelines would seem to override. Certainly worth discussing, I guess, and you are quite welcome to present some draft guidelines to the packaging committee. The package as I reviewed it didn't violate any existing guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241649.n8OGnbBk006523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 12:49:36 EDT --- This package will obsolete all the geda packages available under the fedora repositories. With the upcoming releases, the geda community will provide only big tarball instead of smaller packages. Hence in accordance to fedora packaging guidelines, I have to file another package review before obsoleting the existing fedora geda-gaf packages. Please note that upstream releases, the tarball under the name of gEDA-gaf, however in order to maintain consistency between various distributions, Packagers of various distributions have agreed to use the name geda-gaf as the debian community does not accept capital letters. That said, upstream agreed to release the next release under "geda-gaf" without any capital letters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241652.n8OGqGIM021266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #18 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-24 12:52:13 EDT --- Can this be built for F10 and F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241649.n8OGnrrq020480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241654.n8OGsAbQ007601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 16:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241657.n8OGvQ73008556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christof Damian 2009-09-24 12:57:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-doctrine-Doctrine Short Description: PHP Object Relational Mapper Owners: cdamian Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241701.n8OH1Hh6009967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto 2009-09-24 13:01:16 EDT --- setting fedora-cvs? for lon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241708.n8OH81eB011482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reneploetz at gmx.de --- Comment #2 from Rene Ploetz 2009-09-24 13:07:59 EDT --- This is an unofficial review for the original package and spec file: +: ok !: needs to be fixed -: not applicable MUST Items: [+] rpmlint comes out clean on every package [+] package name meets Package Naming Guidelines [+] spec file name must match base package name [+] the package license (ASL 2.0) is correct and allowed in Fedora [+] spec file is legible and written in American English [+] SOURCE url points to packaged source archive [+] package md5sum matches upstream (69d6c60c4eca3a32de23aa5e3717b6f2) [+] BuildRequires are correctly specified as per Python Guidelines (see below) [+] package builds fine in koji [-] locales are properly handled [+] no system libraries are bundled [-] if package installs libraries in default paths run ldconfig in %post/%postun [!] package owns the directories it creates %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* is not sufficient, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes This way you would not own %{python_sitelib}/%{name} [+] no file is listed twice [+] permissions on files are explictly set (via defattr) [+] package must contain %clean with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [!] macros are consistently used You should decide to either use %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - either one is fine, but mixing them should be avoided. [+] the package has permissable code / content [-] large documentations must be put into -doc subpackage [+] files included in %doc must not be essential for the application to work [-] header files must be in -devel package [-] static libraries must be in a -static package [-] packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must "Requires: pkgconfig" [-] library files without a suffix (foo.so) must go into -devel subpackage if libraries with a suffix (foo.so.0.0) are present. [-] %{name}-devel packages must specify a fully versioned dependency on the %{name} package [-] package must not contain any libtool (.la) archives [-] (most) GUI applications need to include a %{name}.desktop file [+] package must not own any file or directory already owned by another package [+] first command in %install must be rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [+] all filesnames in package are valid UTF-8 SHOULD-Items: [!] if source package does not include license text as seperate file, packager should query upstream to include it [-] if available, description and summary in spec file should contain translations for non-english languages [+] package builds fine in mock [+] package should compile on all supported architectures [+] package does work during a short test [+] scriptlets - if used - must be sane [-] non-devel subpackages should require the base package [-] pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in -devel package [-] if package does require a file outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin, packager should require the package which provides the file (not the file alone) Python-specific MUST-Items: [+] package must (almost always) require python-devel [+] if package wants to install into the global site_packages directory, python_sitelib must be defined according to Python Guidelines [-] python eggs must be built from source [-] python eggs must not be downloading dependencies during build process [+] egg-info files must be included in the package if available [-] compat packages must install using easy_install -m [-] if building multiple versions (compat packages), one package must contain a default version usable via "import modulename" [+] all python source files except those in %{_bindir} and %{_sbindir} must be byte-compiled into *.pyo and both source and compiled version must be included in the package Summary: * package does not own every directory it creates * mixed usage of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: This package will not compile for Fedora < 11, as the setup script will try to compile epoll.c as F10 has only Python 2.5, but this is not a blocker. Other Questions: Why do you use a script to remove the shebangs from files? Creating a patch may be better to verify the changes you make to the source - especially if you only want to make rpmlint happy. You should also consider to update your package to match the latest upstream version (0.2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241715.n8OHF1HJ012934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-24 13:15:00 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm ghc-time.src: W: strange-permission time-1.1.2.4.tar.gz 0600 Normal, expected errors: $ rpmlint ghc-time-prof-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-time-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-time-devel ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/time-1.1.2.4/libHStime-1.1.2.4_p.a Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241716.n8OHGJwo013705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 13:16:18 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704192 In the meantime, did a local, build, tripped up on: ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gschlas' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gattrib' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gnetlist' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gsymcheck' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/gschem' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/sarlacc_schem' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241719.n8OHJsgK027444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 13:19:53 EDT --- OK, full rpmlint output follows: $ rpmlint *.rpm noarch/*.rpm x86_64/*.rpm geda-symbols.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-1.5.4/AUTHORS geda-symbols.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/geda-symbols-1.5.4/ChangeLog-1.0 geda-gaf.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.5.4-1.20090830snap ['1:1.5.4-1.fc11', '1:1.5.4-1'] geda-gaf.x86_64: E: no-binary geda-gattrib.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gattrib ['/usr/lib64'] geda-gnetlist.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gnetlist ['/usr/lib64'] geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/singlenet-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/SlottedOpamps-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/futurenet2/SlottedOpamps-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD_Include_nomunge-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/run_backend_tests.sh geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/TwoStageAmp_Include-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/TwoStageAmp-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/cascade-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD_Sort_nomunge-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD_Sort-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/multiequal-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/netattrib-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD_Include-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/TwoStageAmp_Sort-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/singlenet.pads geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/TwoStageAmp_Sort-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/singlenet-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD_Sort-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD_Sort_nomunge-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/netattrib-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/TwoStageAmp_Include-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/powersupply-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/cascade-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/drc/multiequal-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/run_tests.sh geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/powersupply.pads geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD_Include-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/powersupply-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/TwoStageAmp-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/switcap/SlottedOpamps-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/multiequal-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/SlottedOpamps-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/pads/JD_nomunge-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD_nomunge-output.net geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/runtest.sh geda-gnetlist.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gnetlist/tests/common/outputs/redac/JD_Include_nomunge-output.net geda-gschem.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gschem ['/usr/lib64'] geda-gschem.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/geda-gschem-1.5.4/ChangeLog geda-gsymcheck.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gsymcheck ['/usr/lib64'] geda-gsymcheck.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/gsymcheck/tests/runtest.sh geda-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/sarlacc_schem ['/usr/lib64'] geda-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/gschlas ['/usr/lib64'] geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_sens1-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/translate_col_change_R10_value-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_case_sens-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/multiply_integer_factor-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_insens4-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/translate_col_no_match1-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/process_comment-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_match_negative_real_offset-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/multiply_negative_integer_factor-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/multiply_with_checklist-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/multiply_real_factor-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_to_mil_2cols-protel_example1_mm.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_negative_real_angle-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_real_angle-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_check_cols_no_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/subst_check_cols_no_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_insens2-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/run_tests.sh geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_check_cols_no_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/multiply_negative_real_factor-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_match_real_offset-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_no_args-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_match_negative_offset-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_sens3-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_insens1-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/footprint_protel1-protel_example1_mil.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/panelize_tabulate-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_2mm_6col_tab_notit-protel_example1_mil.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_to_mil-protel_example1_mm.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/output_delimiter-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_sens2-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_to_mm_no_title-protel_example1_mil.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/swap_cols_with_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/swap_cols_no_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_insens2-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_sens4-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_insens3-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_done_notitle-protel_example1_mil.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_check_cols_no_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/translate_col_chg_all_val_plus_k-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/refdes_renum/run_tests.sh geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/insert_col_first_pos-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/translate_col_no_match2-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/footprint_report1-report1.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_sens3-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/insert_col_second_pos-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/match_col_sens1-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/do_nothing-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_insens1-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_sens2-pcb_example2.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/examples/tragesym/alltest geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_check_cols_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/subst_check_cols_match-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/footprint_pcb1-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_case_insens-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/rotate_negative_angle-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/translate_col_R10_value_case_insens-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/chunits_to_mm_2cols-protel_example1_mil.txt-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/do_nothing_tabulated-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/swap_cols_no_matchlist-pcb_example1.xy-error geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/del_case_sens4-pcb_example2.xy-error libgeda.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgeda.so.37.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 libgeda-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 11 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 68 errors, 45 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469895] Review Request: ktable - Custom SWT Table Widget for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241728.n8OHS5Hu016184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469895 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady BuildFails --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-24 13:28:04 EDT --- Just going over some old review tickets and I note that this one fails to build. A scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704262 If you still wish to submit this package, please fix it up so that it builds and clear the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241727.n8OHRSDQ016128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-24 13:27:27 EDT --- >From Comment #3: - The snacc-libs package should not require the snacc package. ==> Now, snacc-libs has been removed. - I've realised that it should be 'Sample' - Sample and Neufeld are the names of the creators. ==> FIXED. >From Comment #4: #001: I prefer to eliminate the -lib subpackage entirely. ==> DONE. #002: Documentation: *.tex and *.bib are pretty useless and inefficient for the user. I propose to build a PDF out of it in the %prep section and ship only the PDF and not the sources. ==> Already .ps file is being shipped in the -base package. I have removed *.tex and *.bib files now. #003: Directory ownership in base package %dir %{_includedir}/%{name}/ ==> DONE. #004: .m4 should this go to -devel ? %{_datadir}/aclocal/snacc.m4 ==> DONE. #005: Patches naming should start with a %{name} prefix, if not they will overwrite other patches with the same name. ==> DONE. These were upstream package names. Now, I have prepended %{name} to them. FYI: automake17 is provided by Fedora to maintain compatibility with own software. The last real update of automake17 on Fedora is back in 2007. It is recommended for upstream to tune their sources with respect to the newer versions. ==> This is a very, very, very old package. Old, as in *1997*. Yet, it is a very useful package. Upstream (Debian alone) has provided it so far. The original code authors' FTP URL doesn't exist at all. Latest at: SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snacc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snacc-1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds at F-10, F-11 and EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704234 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704239 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704255 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241737.n8OHb81N031719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-09-24 13:37:07 EDT --- Your spec file has missing BuildRequires of: python-lxml python-dateutil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241745.n8OHjwaG020571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #34 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 13:45:53 EDT --- Changes look fine. I have an upcoming change for gnustep-make, that makes Documentation, Documentation/User and Documentation/Developer owned by gnustep-filesystem, but I'll fix that in gnustep-base as well when I land the changes. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241753.n8OHrO7a022542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-24 13:53:22 EDT --- How is this package in the distribution when this ticket is still blocking FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241759.n8OHxNqo023768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 13:59:21 EDT --- oh, I guess there aren't any Obsoletes here that I notice, nevermind. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241757.n8OHvVTf023481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 13:57:30 EDT --- check upgrade paths, yum groupinstall electronic-lab Then manually upgraded to everything within the aforementioned scratch build, good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241806.n8OI6lfK025809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 14:06:38 EDT --- No news. :( Feel free to let me know when/if you are around and interested in this again. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241810.n8OIAfh3007780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 14:10:40 EDT --- License should be GPLv2. - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix ? MUST: Package does contain any .la libtool archives (however needed to function) - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Approved Please fix the license before committing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241813.n8OIDuoa027415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(wolfy at nobugconsul | |ting.ro) --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 14:13:54 EDT --- Manuel: gnustep-base has just been approved; could you continue with the review? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241817.n8OIHg8j009115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #22 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 14:17:38 EDT --- 0.35 built, all tests enabled. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.35-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704620 One test fails on F-11 ppc; I'm capturing the test results. This would likely go away when we update F-11's llvm to 2.6, but I'll talk to upstream about it, since they want to keep pure working with older llvm releases too. In any case, shouldn't block the review (worse come to worst, just tell me to ExcludeArch ppc on F-11) I had an earlier Koji F-12 build, done before I disabled some work-arounds (so the PPC build failed when composing the packages in the %files section). But build and check succeed on F-12 as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241816.n8OIGnNC009003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 14:16:48 EDT --- Upstream sources verified: $ md5sum gEDA-gaf-1.5.4.tar.gz d99006d25bb7e61cbbdcc6c775861169 gEDA-gaf-1.5.4.tar.gz 1. MUST: remove rpaths. this snippet (in %prep after %setup) worked nicely for me: %if "%{_libdir}" != "/usr/lib" sed -i -e 's|"/lib /usr/lib|"/%{_lib} %{_libdir}|' configure %endif 2. MUST: remove or document need for including the empty files related to the rpmlint errors like: geda-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gEDA-gaf/utils/tests/gxyrs/outputs/offset_check_cols_match-pcb_example1.xy-error I believe that should take care of all or a majority of the rpmlint items. 3. MUST: add to libgeda-devel Requires: pkgconfig (for directory ownership) 4. MUST: add desktop scriptlet to geda-gschem (it's .desktop file contains MimeTypes= key): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database 5. SHOULD: use %posttrans optimized versions of scriptlets (icons in particular), but not a big deal, adds complexity, but will also speed installation and upgrades. That's all I've got so far, mind fixing these up, and we can do another final pass? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241820.n8OIKORq009854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 14:20:23 EDT --- I'll clarify with upstream, but for what it's worth, source files all either contain variants of: * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * * (at your option) any later version. or *************************************************************************** * Please see toplevel file COPYING for license details * ***************************************************************************/ The latter being a cop-out really. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241823.n8OINOej029617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 14:23:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kmymoney2-aqbanking Short Description: Online banking plugin for KMyMoney Owners: rdieter Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241826.n8OIQ3pK010941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-24 14:26:02 EDT --- 404 while downloading files. The same is for bz #459212. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241832.n8OIWtr0012312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 14:32:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362549) failed built on F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241831.n8OIVmDN012187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 14:31:47 EDT --- It's weird that the scratch build succeeded in koji. On my local machine it failed on F-11. Please see attachment. By the way, you don't have to call a scratch built for each release dump :) One is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525540] New: Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml-3.28.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: GtkHTML is a lightweight HTML rendering/printing/editing engine Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1704677 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241839.n8OIdjpW032687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-assets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241839.n8OIdUVB032615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 14:39:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The latter being a cop-out really. :) It's ok for me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241840.n8OIe6gb014188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-wehjit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241842.n8OIgktv014780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 14:42:45 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241842.n8OIge7g014740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 14:42:39 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241845.n8OIjV5L001984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525358(python-assets) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241845.n8OIjWwr002009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525361(python-wehjit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 18:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241854.n8OIs6IQ018249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #10 from Julian G 2009-09-24 14:54:05 EDT --- I'm sorry i couldn't respond sooner. Thanks for you hints, Colin. @Dieter: it's strange, this line is already in the spec file and it did well on OpenSuse Buildservice. Do I have to set a path? @Colin: 1.) is fixed 2.) Do I have to define these macros? 3.) Should I remove the %doc tag if there isn't any documentation. 4.) Set to Application/Multimedia, is that correct? 5.) There is just this git url as mentioned before, is it better now? 6.) Should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241913.n8OJDFvV010125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #4 from Roland Grunberg 2009-09-24 15:13:14 EDT --- After some more updates : URLs to the Spec, and SRPM files : Spec URL : http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/eclipse-callgraph.spec SRPM URL : http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241923.n8OJNLI9025444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-24 15:23:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnustep-base Short Description: GNUstep Base library package Owners: s4504kr Branches: devel, F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241926.n8OJQDRR026369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-24 15:26:11 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. I know you used RPM Stubby to generate the .spec from an Eclipse feature.xml and it did a nice job :) There are only a few issues with the review and they're listed below on the lines beginning with an X. Please fix them, bump the release and add a comment in your .spec, and post new .spec and SRPM URLs here. Once I've verified it's fixed, we can move along with the process. Thanks. X please add a comment about the installation location (see below; the part about /usr/lib, dependencies, etc.) X please capitalize the beginning of your changelog entry Rest of review: - licensing good - fetch script is fine (contents match when I generate it myself) - BRs/Rs okay - macro usage fine - %files fine - builds and runs fine - rpmlint not okay (but see above): $ rpmlint eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm eclipse-callgraph.i586: E: no-binary eclipse-callgraph.i586: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. - the warning is fine (we have to have this be arch-dependent due to its dependence on the arch-dependent CDT and therefore it must be in %{_libdir}) - there is no binary for the same reason as above $ rpmlint eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241942.n8OJguDT029826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhTOT029909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479585] Review Request: megaupload-dl - Megaupload automatic downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhwaD030008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479585 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhcCH016338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480373] Review Request: cilk - Language for multithreaded parallel programming. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhllI016384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480373 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488498] Review Request: gnome-bluetooth2 - Bluetooth graphical utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhLBv016267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488498 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJh5s1016177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492900] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - Extended and improved version of MgOpen Cosmetica font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241943.n8OJhCur016233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241947.n8OJljBF017561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #15 from Lon Hohberger 2009-09-24 15:47:44 EDT --- Oops - forgot devel branch. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fence-virt Short Description: Pluggable Virtual Machine Fencing Owners: lon Branches: F-12, devel InitialCC: fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241951.n8OJpxDM032231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 --- Comment #3 from Tom Moertel 2009-09-24 15:51:57 EDT --- Jason, thanks for the review. I have contacted Hadley Wickham, the upstream author, about the license. He said that plyr is licensed under the GPLv2. I have updated the spec file accordingly. I have also replaced the R >= R-2.8 requirements with the more reasonable R >= 2.8. Updated sources: Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SPECS/R-plyr.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SRPMS/R-plyr-0.1.9-4.fc10.src.rpm Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241958.n8OJw7JO019940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-24 15:58:06 EDT --- Kashyap, your review was very thorough. If you are looking for a sponsor in the future, feel free to let me know. Jason, in the future, for any change, no matter how small, please increment Release and add a changelog entry to the spec file. This package is approved and I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242001.n8OK1ClU002262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Lon Hohberger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242003.n8OK3BYd002535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #6 from Charley Wang 2009-09-24 16:03:10 EDT --- Updated srpm and spec URL's: SRPM: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/eclipse-callgraph-0.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/stap/eclipse-callgraph.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481409] Review Request: chisholm-to-be-continued-fonts - A stylized font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242000.n8OK0JQh002026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481409 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #13 from Clint Savage 2009-09-24 16:00:17 EDT --- That block should have been removed some time ago. The author changed the license to a free license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 19:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241959.n8OJx8Hi001440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-24 15:59:07 EDT --- Review ======= (Based on local testing with python-assets) Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines (python) - license (GPLv3+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (6f95dd7756c8cb0e43cc5ce51af33cd40429536a2fee5e68144e899d3e55412a) - package compiles on devel (noarch) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521245] Review Request: constantine-kde-theme - Constantine KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242007.n8OK70YJ021794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521245 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 16:07:00 EDT --- built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242009.n8OK9tUt022114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 16:09:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > oh, I guess there aren't any Obsoletes here that I notice, nevermind. :) This was automatically processed by the use of epoch. Once the package has been approved, I'll set the following as dead packages: * libgeda * geda-gschem * geda-symbols * geda-gnetlist * geda-utils * geda-examples * geda-docs * geda-gattrib * geda-gsymcheck -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242006.n8OK6UoL021737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-24 16:06:29 EDT --- Thanks. The %changelog entries should be more descriptive in the future but I'll let it slide this time. Approved. I think you need to make this block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242007.n8OK7Xc1021872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 16:07:32 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/geda-gaf.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/geda-gaf-1.5.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Most of the rpmlint have been fixed. Others are scripts to be executed by the user as documentation. Test case for F-11 ONLY: yum install geda* Setup gedatest repo created from koji scratch build as explain here. yum install geda-gaf.x86_64 --enablerepo=gedatest or yum install geda-gaf.i586 --enablerepo=gedatest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242013.n8OKDAUY004622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-24 16:13:09 EDT --- Sorry forgot to post the url on how to setup the repo: http://chitlesh.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/fel-geda-gaf-1-5-4-versus-fedora-packaging/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242010.n8OKAr26004293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Charley Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242015.n8OKFHXc023530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-09-24 16:15:16 EDT --- No problem. As it turns out, I've been totally swamped at work for the last 3 days. I'm just now coming up for air... This looks good. I see no further issues, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242015.n8OKF2vk004887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-24 16:15:00 EDT --- $ rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Looks good, only a couple of very small nitpicks 1. the locale files look like they belong in the main webkitkde pkg 2. webkitkde-devel probabaly should Requires: kdelibs4-devel 3. %install could use make install/fast ... 4. leave out the "If WebKit does not show up in Konqueror, run 'kbuildsycoca4'. comments, shouldn't be needed But I won't consider any of these review blockers, but please address them prior to building. Otherwise, Source is documented scriptlets good macro usage consistent (could use %%_kde4_appsdir} tested to function APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242024.n8OKOrBn025823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-24 16:24:52 EDT --- I've sponsored Charley. Charley, please go ahead with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242031.n8OKV2uN027139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-24 16:31:01 EDT --- Only those "sed" transformations, which would fail to substitute something silently _without_ causing the package build to fail with errors, are dangerous. In this case, however, on 64-bit multiarch targets the files would be installed into /lib and not found by %{_lib} in the %files section. A failing sed would lead to rpmbuild errors. That's okay. [...] About the -examples sub-package: > I think external package give more flexibility to user in any case. So? What flexibility would that be? First of all, it requires the -devel package. Second, the -devel package requires the main package. Third, the included Makefile explicitly links with libbotan, so a dependency on botan-devel is missing => ne7ssh-devel is missing "Requires: botan-devel" as its headers include botan headers. Fourth, one cannot install the -example package like a separate -doc package to peruse the source code. Fifth, the examples are stored in their own directory instead of together with the API documentation. Sixth, the examples are just 25K uncompressed. Seventh, the base ne7ssh package contains 1.7M of API %doc files. Better split those files into a -doc package. It's covered by the guidelines even. Convinced? I hope so. ;o) [...] The package %description doesn't explain what the package contains. A first sentence like the %summary is missing. Don't assume that %summary and %description are displayed above eachother. There is typo in the %description: s/it's/its/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242033.n8OKXEiL027527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #9 from Charley Wang 2009-09-24 16:33:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-callgraph Short Description: C/C++ Call Graph Visualization Tool Owners: chwang rgrunber Branches: InitialCC: chwang rgrunber akurtakov overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242040.n8OKedv0029200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Charley Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242041.n8OKf2XL029271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242036.n8OKaoZb028376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #10 from Charley Wang 2009-09-24 16:36:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-callgraph Short Description: C/C++ Call Graph Visualization Tool Owners: chwang rgrunber Branches: InitialCC: chwang rgrunber akurtakov overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242039.n8OKdJDI009878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 --- Comment #11 from Charley Wang 2009-09-24 16:39:18 EDT --- (Modified, sorry for the triple post) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-callgraph Short Description: C/C++ Call Graph Visualization Tool Owners: chwang Branches: InitialCC: chwang rgrunber akurtakov overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242047.n8OKlcD8030744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jochen at herr-schmi | |tt.de) | --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-24 16:47:37 EDT --- Because we have a new gnustep-make package and a approve gnustep-base package, I have create a new release of tnustep-gui. Next Release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.14-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 20:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242054.n8OKsjgb014133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #4 from William Cohen 2009-09-24 16:54:44 EDT --- Revised the spec file: To separate out the static library files. To run tests when building the package. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi-3.7.0-1.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 21:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242126.n8OLQVkr026578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #5 from William Cohen 2009-09-24 17:26:30 EDT --- Correction: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi-3.7.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 21:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522613] Review Request: tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242154.n8OLsGAc001177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613 --- Comment #3 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-09-24 17:54:14 EDT --- Thank you, Rene! I've updated the package to fix these issues: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tornado/tornado.spec.1 http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tornado/tornado-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm I've also refactored the way the spurious permissions are handled. I'm using the script to remove the shebangs as mentioned here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files Though either method seems fair to me. I've also contacted upstream for the inclusion of the LICENSE file: http://groups.google.com/group/python-tornado/browse_thread/thread/2045077b2c70dbbf Inspired by Silas Sewell above, I would also like to rename this package to python-tornado. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242200.n8OM09oF022747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 18:00:01 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Package Review: qmpdclient In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242213.n8OMDevD009568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #11 from Colin Coe 2009-09-24 18:13:38 EDT --- Please advise where updated spec and src.rpm files can be found. The spec changelog and release should also be updated. The macros are defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros file. Thanks CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242223.n8OMNWaw013212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jason Gerard DeRose 2009-09-24 18:23:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-assets Short Description: Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming Owners: jderose Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242222.n8OMMkUp012958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from nucleo 2009-09-24 18:22:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I have made all changes 1-4 and use %{_kde4_appsdir} now. Also I have build rpm with the latest svn snapshot that adds possibility to display SSL information. New Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde.spec New SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090924svn.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint still shows 0 errors, 0 warnings (In reply to comment #5) > Source is documented > scriptlets good > macro usage consistent (could use %%_kde4_appsdir} > tested to function > > APPROVED. Thank you, Rex for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: webkitkde Short Description: QtWebKit bindings to KDE Owners: nucleo rdieter Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242221.n8OMLGV4012534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Gareth John 2009-09-24 18:21:14 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package....OK MUST: The package must be named to the Package Naming Guidelines....OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}....OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines....OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines....OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English....OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8....OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content....OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture....OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license....OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings....OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly....OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible....OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL....OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory.....OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros....OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional....OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc....OK MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries....ok MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time....OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package....N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package....N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability)....N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package....N/A MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch....N/A MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.....N/A MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage....N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application.....N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}....N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built....N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun....N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker....N/A MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation....N/A All seems well ....... Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242224.n8OMOZvY013549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Jason Gerard DeRose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jason Gerard DeRose 2009-09-24 18:24:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wehjit Short Description: A Python web-widget library Owners: jderose Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242225.n8OMP5k1013999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 18:25:03 EDT --- Presumably you mean the first review, since nobody appears to be officially reviewing this? Will be done in a few hours -- got to run right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242235.n8OMZwI6003120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242232.n8OMWx7v002431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-24 18:32:58 EDT --- The BuildRequires for this package are incorrect. It should fail before the %build stage due to unmet dependencies, but instead I get a build-time failure: Configuring haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: HTTP ==4000.0.6, cgi ==3001.1.7.1, editline ==0.2.1.0, fgl ==5.4.2.2, network ==2.2.1.4, zlib ==0.5.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242239.n8OMdP6c003795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo+ --- Comment #32 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-09-24 18:39:22 EDT --- mtasaka can you please review the package again? @Cassmodiah update it to the last svn rev that the newest version can be added to fedora :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242253.n8OMrb9f007008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242253.n8OMrLrJ006901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #33 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-24 18:53:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cim-schema Short Description: Common Information Model (CIM) Schema Owners: mdomsch vcrhonek srini praveenp Branches: F-12 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242300.n8ON0YcK009415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242300.n8ON0KMC023545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #18 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-09-24 19:00:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openwsman Short Description:Web Services Management libraries Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-12 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242303.n8ON3eYD010256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 19:03:38 EDT --- ReviewTemplate MUST ? rpmlint source clean. binary not produced due to errors. OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant ? license complies with guidelines complies with guidelines, yes. However, I recall a discussion in -devel about the licensing of Fedora Infrastructure projects.These are supposed to be LGPLv2+ for libraries and GPLv2+ for applications. Yours most likely is not bound by these guidelines, and should the infrastructure team decide to use mutrace, they can (the combination becomes GPLv3+), so this is up to you. OK license field accurate OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English OK spec legible FIX source matches upstream $ sha1sum mutrace-0.1.tar.gz ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz dcb16f9a80262cb608f641ee5c960b15def6ad83 mutrace-0.1.tar.gz 6017fc40158663eeffec4c70ba69cf04cde11ef2 ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz Looks like the source in the SRPM is old: -rw-rw-r--. 1 michel michel 339432 2009-09-22 00:09 mutrace-0.1.tar.gz -rw-rw-r--. 1 michel michel 328641 2009-09-15 18:20 ../SOURCES/mutrace-0.1.tar.gz OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded rpmbuild -bb attempted on x86_64 (see also "no dupes in %files") FIX build dependencies complete missing binutils-devel OK library -> ldconfig OK own all directories FIX no dupes in %files no dupes, but some unpackaged files: %{_libdir}/libmatrace.so and libmutrace-backtrace-symbols.so OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code NA large docs => -doc NA doc not runtime dependent OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it corresponding GPL license text not included FIX package build in mock on all architectures not using mock yet, BR problem OK package functioned as described FIX require package not files require util-linux-ng rather than /usr/bin/getopt ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242307.n8ON7YX4025420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-24 19:07:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > The licensing situation is a bit complicated. Indeed, everything is GPLv2+, > but some of it is also LGPLv2+. That would give a license tag of "GPLv2+ and > (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)" but you also need to indicate which parts of the code are > under which license. The documentation says that you can distribute the cbflib > API under the LGPL, but honestly I'm not sure what they consider to be the API. > There's also some truly public domain code in there, though I doubt the > compiled result preserves any of it uncombined with GPL code. > I've notified upstream and received clarification (anything in the src/ folder is LGPLv2+, everything else is GPLv2+), and asked later versions of the package to differentiate this a bit better. > There's also a potentially troubling notice in some code: > I've also brought this up with upstream, hopefully they can provide information as needed for the fedora legal folks if necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242325.n8ONPhf2017363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 19:25:40 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a while... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 23:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242349.n8ONnFsx024306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 19:49:14 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: cb204f4a507f462d019529af6f547731 xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1.tar.gz cb204f4a507f462d019529af6f547731 xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Rpmlint says: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. (ie, nothing) A simple package and everything looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 00:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250012.n8P0CNKC013638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-24 20:12:21 EDT --- Thanks, that was quick! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin Short Description: User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 00:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250051.n8P0pude026727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 00:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525304] Review Request: notification-daemon-engine-slider - The Slider theme engine for the notification daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250051.n8P0pirD026626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525304 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-09-24 20:51:42 EDT --- The package has been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250102.n8P12AhU030664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:02:04 EDT --- *** Bug 523371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523371] Review Request: gnustep-gui - GNUstep GUI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250102.n8P127lH030623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523371 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:02:04 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475861 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250100.n8P10vgb030296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:00:55 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maximus Short Description: A window management tool Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250122.n8P1MMFG005272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #36 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:22:20 EDT --- Hi Jochen, Some last minute notes: - gnustep-base can Require: gnustep-filesystem instead of gnustep-make (-make should be required only for development packages - gnustep-base-devel should therefore additionally Requires: gnustep-make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476056] Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250127.n8P1RO4b007063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250130.n8P1UZNc026492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:30:34 EDT --- Ah yes, I reorganized my review queue. Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/oolite.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/oolite-1.65-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250126.n8P1QrKT025241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:26:52 EDT --- SRPM needs to be updated, spec is at 0.16-2 MUST ? rpmlint SRPM not available yet OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines FIX license field accurate some files, e.g. Tools/gclose.m and many other Tools/, are GPLv3+ some files are LGPLv3+: $ grep -rl "version 3" `grep -rl "GNU Lesser" *` configure.ac COPYING Headers/Additions/GNUstepGUI/GSVersion.h.in Source/NSMenuItem.m Source/tiff.m Perhaps separate the library into a separate -libs subpackage, which can then be LGPLv2+ and LGPLv3+, and the rest can then be GPLv2+ and GPLv3+? (see Documentation/readme.texi) -doc subpackage should be GFDL. The license file, Documentation/manual/LICENSE should be included in %files doc. Also, %{_datadir}/GNUstep/Documentation/* should be marked as %doc as well. OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English FIX spec legible "gui" in summary and descriptions should perhaps be capitalized ? source matches upstream SRPM not available ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded OK build dependencies complete can drop gnustep-make, as gnustep-base-devel requires it OK library -> ldconfig OK own all directories OK no dupes in %files ? permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code OK large docs => -doc OK doc not runtime dependent OK headers in -devel OK if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig GNUstep variation: if containing Makefiles, req gnustep-make OK if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel OK devel requires versioned base package note: does not need gnustep-make directly, but it's OK to be explicit OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it license file for LGPLv3+ and GPLv2+ missing ? package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described OK scriplets are sane OK other subpackages should require versioned base OK require package not files Summary: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 01:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250135.n8P1ZCmW028240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #20 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-24 21:35:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > > Please see comment # 7 or run rpmlint on the srpm: > $ rpmlint Downloads/gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-2.fc10.src.rpm > gnome-applet-window-picker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line > 1, tab: line 3) > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > This is fixed in the new spec. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 02:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250253.n8P2rOQV003681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r.landmann at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 02:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250255.n8P2tTOt004592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Walsh 2009-09-24 22:55:27 EDT --- Can we get this approved, I really want to get it out in Fedora 12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 02:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250258.n8P2wVT0005479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Ruediger Landmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250300.n8P30Z9m006513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(wolfy at nobugconsul | |ting.ro) | --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2009-09-24 23:00:32 EDT --- The requested URL /specs/etoile/oolite-1.65-1.fc10.src.rpm was not found on this server. please be as kind as to provide src.rpm for both oolite and oolite-data. And before doing that, please make sure that your spec does not create unowned directories, because at the first glance over oolite-data.spec, oolite.app/Contents/Resources/ and oolite.app/Contents/ (the directories, not the their content ) seem to be in this situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250301.n8P31YdJ025161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #8 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-24 23:01:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext Short Description: Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks Owners: rlandmann Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250318.n8P3IZkZ029630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-24 23:18:33 EDT --- Please add perl-sig to InitialCC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250324.n8P3OIhu012466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #10 from Ruediger Landmann 2009-09-24 23:24:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext Short Description: Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks Owners: rlandmann Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250357.n8P3v3KZ019490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 23:57:03 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250356.n8P3uwwi006097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 23:56:57 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 03:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250357.n8P3v8dR006149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 23:57:08 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-lunit-0.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250506.n8P56jQt032753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-25 01:06:43 EDT --- yes, i agree that gplv3 is not compatible with gplv2, however regarding to this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_about_interpreted_languages_.28perl.2C_python.2C_etc.29.3F_If_I_have_a_package_written_in_an_interpreted_language.2C_and_it_pulls_in_code_.28of_the_same_language.29_from_a_different.2C_independent_package_at_runtime.2C_should_I_take_its_license_into_account_when_tagging_my_package.3F it should be ok. i will ask on fedora-legal about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250517.n8P5H9Fl001934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-25 01:17:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, the version is 1.14, 1.14.2. > > For 1.14-0: > * License > - Well README says the license is the same as Ruby, > lib/trollop.rb says it is under GPLv2. So the license > tag should be "GPLv2" > > * Redundant macro > - Is the definition of %ruby_sitelib needed? > > * %check > - As this gem contains test/ directory, please add %check > stage and execute a test program. > > * Directory ownership issue > - The directory %geminstdir itself is not owned by any packages. -all fixed Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-trollop-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 05:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250525.n8P5PqaL022895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-25 01:25:51 EDT --- This is only saying that if a software containing scripts only written by Ruby, licensed under BSD "require"s (in ruby's sense) some other codes written by Ruby, licensed under GPLv2+, the license tag is still okay with "BSD", for example. The compatibility issue still remains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 06:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250629.n8P6TLLI002442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-25 02:29:20 EDT --- A few additional remarks from me: :) - the license tag must be GPLv3+ (because of the addition "or (at your option) any later version" in the source headers) - the given URL doesn't seem to be up-to-date (404) - append the CFLAGS assignment to the make statement: make CLconverter CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" - in %files, replace %defattr(-,root,root) by %defattr(-,root,root,-) - you should add a changelog entry with a short summary about the changes for each revision, so that the file history can be reproduced - change the file permissions of the tarball to 0644 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/CLconverter-* CLconverter.src: W: strange-permission CLconverter-0.4.7.tar.gz 0755 CLconverter-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250727.n8P7RlgP013601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-25 03:27:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xml-writer Short Description: Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 Owners: red Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250730.n8P7U2ej014146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 03:30:01 EDT --- Ok, continuing with review. Since all data was collected by the way, similar to one, used by folks from nouveau project (exploring data dumps, w/o reverse engineering binary driver blobs from manufacturer), I don't think that there are legal issues. However, just to be sure, I'm raising FE-LEGAL flag here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250732.n8P7WE2F014584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys 2009-09-25 03:32:11 EDT --- Ben, As you can read above, we decided not to push this to F10/F11 as the current version is not stable enough. As soon as there's a better version (i.e. a gold release), I'll push it to testing/stable repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459212] Review Request: oolite-data - Data files for Oolite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250742.n8P7gh9T029077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459212 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-25 03:42:41 EDT --- Closing this bug, as upstream has merged oolite and oolite-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250741.n8P7fx5M028935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-25 03:41:58 EDT --- Sorry; should have posted a note that the URL above is broken. I've decided to update to oolite 1.73.4 instead (the latest "development" release, but the stable release is really unsupported now). Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/oolite.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/etoile/oolite-1.73.4-1.fc12.src.rpm There is no more separate oolite-data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250744.n8P7itJs029463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 03:44:55 EDT --- Assuming, that FE-LEGAL probably will be unblocked, here is my REVIEW: * rpmlint is not silent. [petro at Sulaco ~]$ rpmlint ~/fuse/sshfs/work/Desktop/madwimax-0.1.1-1.fc11.ppc.rpm madwimax.ppc: E: summary-too-long User-space driver for mobile WiMAX (802.16e) devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip madwimax.ppc: E: description-line-too-long madWiMAX is a reverse-engineered Linux driver for mobile WiMAX (802.16e) devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip. These devices are currently supported: madwimax.ppc: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/z60_madwimax.rules 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ~]$ Please, shorten these lines. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum madwimax-0.1.1.tar.gz* 17ac297934654663586df837dcff2bd6d3bbabddd76efdffa26713b07e08ad5f madwimax-0.1.1.tar.gz 17ac297934654663586df837dcff2bd6d3bbabddd76efdffa26713b07e08ad5f madwimax-0.1.1.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji logs above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The packages does NOT contain copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + the package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code or permissible content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Ok, let's wait for the reaction from the Legal Team. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250751.n8P7pd5B020893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-25 03:51:37 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-time Short Description: Haskell time library Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250814.n8P8E1Nn004606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 04:13:59 EDT --- xls2csv-1.06-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xls2csv-1.06-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250824.n8P8OZTu028191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 04:24:34 EDT --- xls2csv-1.06-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xls2csv-1.06-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225890] Merge Review: htmlview In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250837.n8P8bBdW009864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225890 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 04:37:11 EDT --- Ops! Sorry for buzz - wrong ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225890] Merge Review: htmlview In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250836.n8P8aU3U009789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225890 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 04:36:29 EDT --- Pong! It seems that David is busy with other stuff, so i decided to step in and fix all these small issues (except dropping README - I cannot decide whether we should drop it or no, but, however, if you're insisting, then I will drop it too). Here is a koji scratchbuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1705983 rpmlint log: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/fuse/sshfs/work/Desktop/hfsutils-* hfsutils-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ I'm currently updating cvs branches, and will rebuild it very shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250837.n8P8bYVn031308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 04:37:32 EDT --- Pong! It seems that David is busy with other stuff, so i decided to step in and fix all these small issues (except dropping README - I cannot decide whether we should drop it or no, but, however, if you're insisting, then I will drop it too). Here is a koji scratchbuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1705983 rpmlint log: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/fuse/sshfs/work/Desktop/hfsutils-* hfsutils-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ I'm currently updating cvs branches, and will rebuild it very shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524277] Review Request: dbacl - Digramic Bayesian text classifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250839.n8P8dPWk010121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524277 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-25 04:39:24 EDT --- $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/dbacl-* dbacl.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.9-2.f11 ['1.9-2.fc11', '1.9-2'] dbacl.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1 dbacl.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/dbacl/doc/prop.pl 0644 /usr/bin/perl dbacl.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. - according to src/dbcl.h, the license tag must be GPLv2+ - The interactive mode of mailinspect is currently disabled because of the following missing BRs: ncurses-devel, readline-devel, slang-devel. However, the sources don't compile without further patching since they seem to rely on an older version of libslang. - use macros in the %files section: %{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man1/* - the documentation is quite extensive, so it's probably a good idea to put it in a -doc subpackage - I'm not sure whether the testsuite must be added. If so, it should probably go in a separate package. - add the files AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, NEWS, README and THANKS to %doc - remove .f11 from the version numbers in the changelog entries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250843.n8P8h5rl032318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 04:43:04 EDT --- xls2csv-1.06-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xls2csv-1.06-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250843.n8P8hG9h032362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250847.n8P8l0Hd000750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #10 from Mario Basic 2009-09-25 04:46:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" CLconverter > would have been it. > > > 5.done > You seem to have rebuilt the tarball without incrementing the version. > A reasonable upstream increments the version each time it releases a new > tarball, because people are checking tarballs for changes and will yell at you > when a tarball is being replaced without incrementing the version. > > BTW1: Did you consider to add a Makefile to your package? It would help > packagers of various distros and OSes, and assist them to avoid having to > figure out how your package is supposed to be built. > > BTW2: Do you have another package on review? Based on this package review > alone, I am not yet sufficiently convinced about your packaging expertise to > sponsor you. I've changed the spec file to use make CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" CLconverter. Totally forgotten about changing the version. Will look into how to create a Makefile. I have done it once before but forgotten. No, this one only, yet. (In reply to comment #9) > A few additional remarks from me: :) > > - the license tag must be GPLv3+ (because of the addition "or > (at your option) any later version" in the source headers) > > - the given URL doesn't seem to be up-to-date (404) > > - append the CFLAGS assignment to the make statement: > make CLconverter CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" > > - in %files, replace %defattr(-,root,root) by %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > - you should add a changelog entry with a short summary about the changes for > each revision, so that the file history can be reproduced > > - change the file permissions of the tarball to 0644 > > > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/CLconverter-* > CLconverter.src: W: strange-permission CLconverter-0.4.7.tar.gz 0755 > CLconverter-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. I've changed the license tag. URL to the new files is below. I've used the suggestion from comment #8 to set the CFLAGS. I have replaced %defattr(-,root,root) to %defattr(-,root,root,-). SPEC URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Srpm/CLconverter-0.4.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 08:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250858.n8P8wgKL002897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250905.n8P95Vee004612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-09-25 05:05:28 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 38ce1ae1815a74d6ab3e7ee0e034714267456d16 netplug-1.2.9.1.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. Ok compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - %{_initddir} is the preferred variant of the macro, works on F-10+ - rpmbuild takes care of buildroot This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250906.n8P961Wi015851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-25 05:06:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Only those "sed" transformations, which would fail to substitute something > silently _without_ causing the package build to fail with errors, are > dangerous. In this case, however, on 64-bit multiarch targets the files would > be installed into /lib and not found by %{_lib} in the %files section. A > failing sed would lead to rpmbuild errors. That's okay. No, build package will be filed later in %files section when file not found in %{_lib} will be raised. This is why it hack appeared. > > I think external package give more flexibility to user in any case. > > So? What flexibility would that be? First of all, it requires the -devel > package. Second, the -devel package requires the main package. Yes, off course. I expect what all my dependencies is correct and installation of ne7ssh-examples would require ne7ssh and ne7ssh-devel and all other required dependencies. BUT, you are free ot do not install ne7ssh-example - it is not required by anything other. > Third, the > included Makefile explicitly links with libbotan, so a dependency on > botan-devel is missing => ne7ssh-devel is missing "Requires: botan-devel" as > its headers include botan headers. Why? BuildRequires: cmake botan-devel present in spec. > Fourth, one cannot install the -example > package like a separate -doc package to peruse the source code. Yes, I known. This is because it contain Makefile to build examples, and its will fail, if ne7ssh-devel is not present in system. So, it is ok. If you only want read examples and known what you do, you always can install it forced without dependencies. > Fifth, the > examples are stored in their own directory instead of together with the API > documentation. And what? This is incorrect? > Sixth, the examples are just 25K uncompressed. And what? It can't be separate package because it? > Seventh, the base > ne7ssh package contains 1.7M of API %doc files. Better split those files into a > -doc package. Yes, there you are right. I'll do that. > It's covered by the guidelines even. Please, can you point me where? > The package %description doesn't explain what the package contains. A first > sentence like the %summary is missing. Don't assume that %summary and > %description are displayed above eachother. Should I repeat Summary in %description?? I believe not. > There is typo in the %description: s/it's/its/ Thank you, fixed. P.S. I'll -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250911.n8P9B2tH016982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 05:11:01 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-18.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hfsutils-3.2.6-18.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250911.n8P9B79x005964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 05:11:07 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-18.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hfsutils-3.2.6-18.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250920.n8P9KrGg007661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-25 05:20:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=362549) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362549) [details] > failed built on F-11 In your log, even though the Makefile is being created for c++-lib/tcl/, it is invoking the build in it with -DTCL with g++. It doesn't invoke the Makefile in the directory in my system or in Koji. I still did pass the --without-tcl option, but, configure still says: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --without-tcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250932.n8P9WwlI021431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 05:32:56 EDT --- I think we may close this ticket, since all issues were addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 09:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250955.n8P9tNlI026933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-25 05:55:22 EDT --- Okay. Still to be fixed: SHOULD: Use INSTALL="install -p" as additional argument to make install to preserve time stamps (header files are not probably generated in %build). MUST: Devel package needs to provide %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251000.n8PA0T0h028020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-25 06:00:24 EDT --- > No, build package will be filed later in %files section > when file not found in %{_lib} will be raised. Calm down. I had pointed that out already and confirmed that the "sed" usage is okay in this case. > BUT, you are free ot do not install ne7ssh-example - > it is not required by anything other. Is that the only benefit you could think of? To save 25KB of example files you introduce a separate package (and corresponding repository metadata)? A separate package which developers, who may have interest in those files, would need to search for. It would be much more plausible to include those files in the -devel package. Examples in source code form are Documentation. > BuildRequires: cmake botan-devel present in spec. You didn't understand or you didn't pay attention to what I wrote. "Requires: botan-devel" is missing in ne7ssh-devel > > It's covered by the guidelines even. > Please, can you point me where? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation > Should I repeat Summary in %description?? I believe not. You should start with a sentence that explains what the package contains and what "It" refers to. Is it an application? A library? What is it? Instead, the current description starts with "It utilizes Botan library for...". Moving the third paragraph at the beginning of the description and making it start with "This SSH library..." would make *a lot* of sense. Give it a second thought, please. I'm not making up things just for fun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251012.n8PACrGM018706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jiri Popelka 2009-09-25 06:12:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: netplug Short Description: Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out Owners: jpopelka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251018.n8PAIwuk031792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 06:18:56 EDT --- All issues were addressed and fixed. I just wondering who's still requiring static library, and I hope that someone will remove *.la file completely :) (can't do it by myself, since it will be a change in ABI). I just updated cvs, and will rebuild it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251019.n8PAJwrl019899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 06:19:57 EDT --- Oops. Forgot about *-static. I'll add these changes shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251048.n8PAm6c5005439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 06:48:06 EDT --- libgssapi-0.11-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgssapi-0.11-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251048.n8PAm22o005407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 06:48:01 EDT --- libgssapi-0.11-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgssapi-0.11-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251053.n8PArSEE006513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Jens Ayton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla.ja at oolite.o | |rg --- Comment #13 from Jens Ayton 2009-09-25 06:53:26 EDT --- A comment on the SpiderMonkey issue: we intend to be up-to-date in the next full (i.e., feature-stable) release of Oolite, and hopefully for the 1.74-test release. There are API and build issues with upgrading (across all platforms); not huge, but not trivial. However, Oolite depends on SpiderMonkey being built with the JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8 feature macro enabled, while Firefox currently depends on it not being enabled. (There?s a runtime check in Oolite for this.) Switching to JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8 is a to-do for Mozilla 2.0, as attempting to do it for 1.9 broke stuff. (Specifically, bits of Mozilla incorrectly use strings as a binary blob, and fixing this requires API changes.) This is Mozilla bug 315288, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315288 Until Mozilla 2.0 and whatever the relevant versions of Firefox etc. will be, Oolite won't be able to use system-provided SpiderMonkey. If we reverted to stone-age string handling in Oolite to work around this, we'd be incompatible when the Mozilla issue is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 10:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251054.n8PAscRk026434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 J changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |buggy at x-rayman.co.uk --- Comment #28 from J 2009-09-25 06:54:33 EDT --- Not certain on the formal - "tester" requirements but I'm happy to give it ago. Currently dowloading src will buildlocal & mockbuild and test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251100.n8PB0E4L007966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 07:00:13 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251100.n8PB08bm007931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 07:00:08 EDT --- hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hfsutils-3.2.6-19.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251104.n8PB40jR008651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #14 from manuel wolfshant 2009-09-25 07:03:58 EDT --- In view of #13, I guess it's high time to officially ask for approval for shipping an internal copy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251122.n8PBMkMJ012568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 07:22:41 EDT --- I'm sure this ticket may be closed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251130.n8PBU5Nt014213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(e at arix.com) --- Comment #12 from Tomas Mraz 2009-09-25 07:29:22 EDT --- Any progress getting the package into CVS and build system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251152.n8PBq5qq018662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 07:52:05 EDT --- python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 11:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251152.n8PBq0pW018626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 07:51:59 EDT --- python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225657] Merge Review: cpufrequtils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251201.n8PC1dFu020567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225657 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476056] Review Request: gnustep-back - The GNUstep backend library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251203.n8PC341Q007641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476056 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251205.n8PC5LRA008447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251210.n8PCARYv009925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 08:10:26 EDT --- Should be closed, I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251210.n8PCAnEx022886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251222.n8PCMS9V012332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #9 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-25 08:22:26 EDT --- All requested changes made (as per above). Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/avra/avra-1.2.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 12:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251258.n8PCwZFB000603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-25 08:58:33 EDT --- Can you drop the static library altogether? You can drop the .la files in rawhide, since ABI changes are allowed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251318.n8PDIvkY025261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-25 09:18:55 EDT --- ok, if I contact upstream to provide explicit permission for linking/require to trollop library, would it fix this licensing issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251324.n8PDOK5u026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nsheridan at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-25 09:24:17 EDT --- Another one ping. Niall, are you still here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251338.n8PDcAJL009386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #20 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-25 09:38:06 EDT --- Ah right. Was looking at it to try it out and saw it was Rawhide only. Forgot the pre-release status of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251342.n8PDgL3A030195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-25 09:42:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ok, if I contact upstream to provide explicit permission for linking/require to > trollop library, would it fix this licensing issue? In my knowledge, yes: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLIncompatibleLibs http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251347.n8PDlRCx031399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: qmpdclient |Review Request: qmpdclient | |- A Qt4 based MPD client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 13:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251352.n8PDqsFr032612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Charley Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 14:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251434.n8PEYB4N011512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #29 from J 2009-09-25 10:34:04 EDT --- Coot fails to build: mmdb-devel > 1.20 is needed by coot-0.6-2.20090920svn2334.fc11.src current version is 1.19 in the main Fedora 11 release. Are you using a testing repo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 14:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251455.n8PEtLgG030151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #17 from Christian Krause 2009-09-25 10:55:18 EDT --- Thanks for the new package. All problems are solved now besides one minor issue: (In reply to comment #16) > > You have used: > > Obsoletes: gsynaptics <= 0.9.17 > > IMHO this should be: > > Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.17 > > ( > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages > > Well, that's just an example, both will work just fine. Anyway, I removed it. You've used now: Obsoletes: gsynaptics = 0.9.17 which won't work since it will not obsolete the currently installed versions named like 0.9.16.x . Looks like this was just a typo. Please can you use Obsoletes: gsynaptics < 0.9.17 Once this minor change is done, the package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251516.n8PFGMW0022544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #18 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-25 11:16:21 EDT --- Doh! I removed the wrong char (staying up late didn't help...). I can't upload now the fixed spec, but if you can approve the review anyway I'll surely import in CVS the fixed version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525274] Review Request: eclipse-callgraph - generates function call graph linked to Eclipse CDT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251535.n8PFZ2bw027012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525274 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-25 11:35:00 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251550.n8PFoQCp030801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-09-25 11:50:25 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libwpg New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251547.n8PFlxBf030173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525759] New: Review Request: QtCurve-KDE4 - A set of widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 based apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: QtCurve-KDE4 - A set of widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 based apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525759 Summary: Review Request: QtCurve-KDE4 - A set of widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 based apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/QtCurve-KDE4.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/QtCurve-KDE4-0.68.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: QtCurve is a desktop theme for the GTK+ and Qt widget toolkits, allowing users to achieve a uniform look between three widget toolkits. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint QtCurve-KDE4.spec ../SRPMS/QtCurve-KDE4-0.68.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/QtCurve-KDE4-* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1707213 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 15:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251559.n8PFxItK014099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-25 11:59:15 EDT --- Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA256SUM of package: f636e8bb3f54515be77476f99fd962801d2d3f32bb43e154b459df4c64974f99 perl-NOCpulse-CLAC-1.9.8.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the tests pass == APPROVED == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251613.n8PGDVmx017092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:13:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251614.n8PGE7ek004183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 12:14:06 EDT --- frepple-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frepple-0.7.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251614.n8PGE1Yb004139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 12:13:58 EDT --- frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251612.n8PGCc76003937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:12:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251615.n8PGFe8H004656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:15:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522169] Review Request: netplug - Daemon that responds to network cables being plugged in and out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251614.n8PGEZe4017274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522169 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:14:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] New: Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Summary: Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rftg/rftg.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rftg/rftg-0.5.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a project to create artificial intelligence opponent(s) for the card game Race for the Galaxy. Currently, the base game and both released expansions are supported. Code is GPLv2+, but the artwork is (only) redistributable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523330] Review Request: maximus - A window management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251623.n8PGN4Hw006071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523330 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:23:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251623.n8PGN2uo006031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-25 12:23:01 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal for verification -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251625.n8PGPRpu019582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:25:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251629.n8PGTx19007538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:29:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251626.n8PGQBOV007025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:26:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251628.n8PGSKRm007358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:28:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525361] Review Request: python-wehjit - A Python web-widget library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251633.n8PGXXKb020902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525361 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:33:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251630.n8PGUkPY020510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:30:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525358] Review Request: python-assets - Cache-friendly asset management via content-hash-naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251632.n8PGWfWM020759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525358 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:32:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251634.n8PGYrcj008619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:34:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251637.n8PGbnSl021873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:37:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251638.n8PGcIcu021960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:38:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478962] Review Request: libwpg - Library for reading WordPerfect Graphics images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251641.n8PGfNRx022769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478962 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:41:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251645.n8PGjB1n010988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #11 from narendra_k at dell.com 2009-09-25 12:45:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362690) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362690) libnetdevname - patch incorporating review comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251645.n8PGjNRw023821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251646.n8PGkBRZ023987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 narendra_k at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(srinivas_ramanath | |a at dell.com) | --- Comment #12 from narendra_k at dell.com 2009-09-25 12:46:09 EDT --- I have attached a patch incorporating review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251647.n8PGlQKX024182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |praveen_paladugu at dell.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251653.n8PGr4au013082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #13 from Bill Nottingham 2009-09-25 12:53:03 EDT --- That still requires the caller allocate the string; having the API return a newly-allocated string seems simpler to me. Andy, Matt - other ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251703.n8PH3XYr003899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-09-25 13:03:30 EDT --- With respect to comment 8, I prefer to have all the BRs in one place because then I can easily see what I need to build. Let's chalk that one up to personal taste. Thank you very much for the thorough review. With respect to comment 9, now I'm really confused. I added that because of the problem you noted in comment 1 and comment 4. I never saw that problem myself. So are you saying that it disappeared as mysteriously as it appeared? That makes me nervous.... If the package now meets with your approval, can you set the fedora-review flag to +? Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251710.n8PHAu7i031083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251718.n8PHIHvr008552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #45 from Linuxguy123 2009-09-25 13:18:12 EDT --- I'm happy to see that someone (Adam (et al ?)) are sticking with the effort to get navit into Fedora. Good work. Some of us really appreciate your efforts. Keep it up and post if you need help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251722.n8PHMkWu023871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 13:22:44 EDT --- xml-writer-0.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml-writer-0.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251723.n8PHNKHP013336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 13:23:19 EDT --- xml-writer-0.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml-writer-0.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251725.n8PHPQI2027335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251737.n8PHbNBt003221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 13:37:22 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090924svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090924svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251735.n8PHZvNm002626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-25 13:35:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IPC-DirQueue Short Description: Disk-based many-to-many task queue Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251736.n8PHaOi1026711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 13:36:22 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090924svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090924svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251736.n8PHaEMC026320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251737.n8PHbNKS027340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-25 13:37:21 EDT --- last time (redir), the cvs admin forget EL-4 asking both, EL-4 and EL-5 for pg_top Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pg_top New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: itamarjp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251741.n8PHfX6u005414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #46 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-25 13:41:31 EDT --- updated with latest points from Till addressed: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.2-0.2.20090918svn2578.aw_fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251748.n8PHmq0l007977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 13:48:51 EDT --- Sorry about that on redir, should be fixed now. I didn't 'forget' it, it was a typo. ;( cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251748.n8PHm360007908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-25 13:48:02 EDT --- last time (redir), the cvs admin forget EL-4 asking both, EL-4 and EL-5 for pg_top Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pg_top New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: itamarjp atorkhov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251749.n8PHnJVM032554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251750.n8PHo9DR000476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-25 13:50:09 EDT --- thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 17:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] New: Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Summary: Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: naoki at getpopfile.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://getpopfile.org/browser/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec?format=raw SRPM URL: http://getpopfile.org/downloads/popfile-1.1.1-1.1.src.rpm Description: POPFile is an automatic mail classification tool. Once properly set up and trained, it will scan all email as it arrives and classify it based on your training. You can give it a simple job, like separating out junk e-mail, or a complicated one-like filing mail into a dozen folders. Think of it as a personal assistant for your inbox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251814.n8PIELKW015433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #18 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-25 14:14:18 EDT --- ------ > ~ make your init.d-script conform Conform to what?? ------ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript you are missing a reload function ----- > ~ add a logrotate for log-files For what if it has inner mechanism of log rotation?? Just rpmlint can't known about this. ----- You can read some stuff about logrotate in the logrotate manpage --- RabbIT.spec Source1: %{lname}.logrotate .. .. # install log rotation stuff mkdir -p %{buildroot}/etc/logrotate.d install -pm0644 %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}/etc/logrotate.d/%{lname} .. .. %attr(600,%{lname},root) %ghost %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name}/main_run.log .. %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{lname} --- please don't give read and execute acess to users log files dont need execute (for root, too) --- rabbit.logrotate /var/log/rabbit/*log { weekly notifempty missingok } --- After you changed that, package should be okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251817.n8PIHAeU009586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251823.n8PINBL6011068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn 2009-09-25 14:23:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Coot fails to build: > mmdb-devel > 1.20 is needed by coot-0.6-2.20090920svn2334.fc11.src current > version is 1.19 in the main Fedora 11 release. Are you using a testing repo? Yes - you'll need to update mmdb and clipper to the -devel branch versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251829.n8PITGBk012169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m), | |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-09-25 14:29:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > According to the spec files, neither TurboGears2 nor python-catwalk requires or > build requires the other package. Okay if I remove python-catwalk blocking TG2? python-tg-devtools contains the `paster quickstart` command that spits out TG2 apps, which does require python-catwalk. So this shouldn't block TG2, but python-tg-devtools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251841.n8PIfnI2018706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251841.n8PIfmcp018677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468804 Bug 507697 depends on bug 507695, which changed state. Bug 507695 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251841.n8PIfN6I017882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #14 from Shyam kumar Iyer 2009-09-25 14:41:22 EDT --- >That still requires the caller allocate the string; having the API return a >newly-allocated string seems simpler to me. Andy, Matt - other ideas? The apps would then have to take care of freeing the newly allocated string ... Would that be acceptable ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251845.n8PIjqYk032671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251845.n8PIjpCF032650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525795 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] New: Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Summary: Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] New: Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Summary: Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler-0.2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 18:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251850.n8PIo2w2024481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-09-25 14:50:00 EDT --- APPROVED The only comment I have to add is to consider removing the buildroot definition and removal of it in the install section unless to reduce spec clutter unless you are branching for EPEL as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251912.n8PJCpkg008662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-09-25 15:12:50 EDT --- One more thing. It doesn't show up in the games menu for me in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251918.n8PJIoDp030864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-25 15:18:49 EDT --- confirmed, I'll fix that before releasing any updates here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251918.n8PJIxxu030905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 15:18:58 EDT --- xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251920.n8PJKtDS031498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 15:20:54 EDT --- xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-xfswitch-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251922.n8PJM3Mk031860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-25 15:22:02 EDT --- found it (missing Exec= key in .desktop file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251925.n8PJPbFu011716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-25 15:25:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rftg Short Description: Race for the Galaxy card game Owners: rdieter Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251934.n8PJYQEW013293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 15:34:25 EDT --- php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251947.n8PJl3kx015807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #10 from Steve Dickson 2009-09-25 15:47:01 EDT --- I would say go for it... if some complains we can always put it back or figure out why they need it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251950.n8PJoS5a016679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-25 15:50:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript > you are missing a reload function Yes, I known. I speak that initially. I think ignore rpmlint warning is best solution instead of add empty reload stub. > You can read some stuff about logrotate in the logrotate manpage Off course I can. But for what? I known basis. If I add files for logrotate it will conflict with inner system of log rotation. So, we got one or both logs corrupted, nothing else. In this case I can try search way to replace inner method by logrotate one, but really I should do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 19:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251955.n8PJtJ52006352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #8 from David Huff 2009-09-25 15:55:17 EDT --- New spec... http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node.spec scratch build... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1707859 output form rpmlint. I fixed most of the issues the ones remaing are mainly with our init scripts which are not triditional initscripts. Most issues are with /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions, which is not an init script at all but helper file like /etc/init.d/functions, no really sure hwo to treat in it the spec. ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions 0644 None ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-non-executable /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions The remain warrning are with our outher initscripts which are scripts thate are just run ones like /etc/rc.d/init.d/network and do not really need are reload..... ovirt-node.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-post ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-early Any suggestions on /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252000.n8PK0gJM007630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #69 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-25 16:00:35 EDT --- Sorry for delay guys. (In reply to comment #67) > I've looked at the newest package (and especially at the new > subpackage) and unfortunately there are some new issues: > > TODO: > The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by the javaviewers > subpackage. > Using %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/classes should > fix it. Ups, sorry. Fixed. > TODO: > The subpackage should require the fully-versioned main package: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Why? I think in this case, when its built in separate source release of main package have no matter. > TODO: > Regarding the BR for the build of the java parts please follow these > guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires > > It may be debatable whether the "Requires:" are need, but since > the java clients may also be executed outside of the browser, it would > be OK to use them. I add only BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 BuildRequires: jpackage-utils but you are right, Java applets intended even on remote machine execution, so, it do not Require in current. > TODO: > There are some minor wording/spelling mistakes in the description > of the javaviewers sub-package. I suggest the following: > > Summary: VNC clients (java applets) VNC clients (browser java applets) ok? > > Description: > The package contains the corresponding java clients for %{name}. They > can be used with any java-enabled browser and provide an easy access to > the server without the need to install software on the client machine. Ok. > TODO: > Man pages should not be marked as %doc. (sorry, I've overseen this in > the first review) Ok, thanks. > TODO: > Please use consistently: %defattr(-,root,root,-) Ok. > TODO: > In general the java packaging guidelines encourage the packagers > to build the GCJ AOT bits: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines > I've had a quick look and it looks like that it is possible to activate it. Is it really required? What advantage for that in nowadays? Only add mesh into spec legibility... > TODO: > Please add the files mentioned by Orcan in #66 to the subpackage as well. Off course. > MINOR: > please replace "ln -s" by %%{__ln_s} Ok. Additionally I change License: GPLv2+ for javaviewers subpackage as Spot say in post #68. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-12.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252006.n8PK6gkJ021008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(e at arix.com) | --- Comment #13 from Erick Calder 2009-09-25 16:06:40 EDT --- oh dear, I dropped the ball. I'll get back to you shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252006.n8PK6lJq009425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:06:46 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252008.n8PK8FSm009733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:08:11 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252006.n8PK6pIx009463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.03-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252008.n8PK8K3e009785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.273-5.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252011.n8PKBiMT022965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:11:42 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update editarea'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252011.n8PKBOFq022879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:11:23 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Diff-Parser'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9930 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252016.n8PKG2Wl012797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:16:01 EDT --- perl-Text-FormatTable-1.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252015.n8PKFWio012657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.273-5.fc10 |1.273-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252014.n8PKEhRc012180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:14:42 EDT --- perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Diff-Parser'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9956 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252015.n8PKFF0s024474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:15:14 EDT --- bournal-1.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bournal-1.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252015.n8PKFA4g024353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:15:08 EDT --- bournal-1.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bournal-1.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252015.n8PKFQL9024609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:15:25 EDT --- firehol-1.273-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252014.n8PKEWLu023927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:14:31 EDT --- canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update canorus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9953 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252016.n8PKGbn5024779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:16:36 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update editarea'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9963 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252014.n8PKEHt0023842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 16:14:15 EDT --- canorus-0.7-4.R1177.20090904svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update canorus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9951 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523404] Review Request: perl-Text-FormatTable - Format text tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252016.n8PKG7Cf012952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.03-1.fc11 |1.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252028.n8PKSMrn027403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-25 16:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > With respect to comment 8, I prefer to have all the BRs in one place because > then I can easily see what I need to build. Let's chalk that one up to > personal taste. Thank you very much for the thorough review. That's absolutely OK for me, and you're welcome. > With respect to comment 9, now I'm really confused. I added that because of > the problem you noted in comment 1 and comment 4. I never saw that problem > myself. So are you saying that it disappeared as mysteriously as it appeared? > That makes me nervous.... Yes that's strange. When I built the package yesterday, the flags were set properly without an explicit %attr prefix. I can't reproduce the problem at the moment... > If the package now meets with your approval, can you set the fedora-review flag > to +? Sure. ------------------------ The package is APPROVED. ------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:32:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:32:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] New: Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Summary: Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/pigz.spec SRPM URL: http://193.200.113.196/apache2-default/rpm/pigz-2.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: pigz, which stands for parallel implementation of gzip, is a fully functional replacement for gzip that exploits multiple processors and multiple cores to the hilt when compressing data. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1707938 rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252034.n8PKY2oj016942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #14 from Erick Calder 2009-09-25 16:34:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_gnutls Short Description: GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server Owners: e at arix.com Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: tmraz at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252034.n8PKYO8B028423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2009-09-25 16:34:23 EDT --- Hmmm. Okay, I'll take the %attr back out and we'll see if the problem crops up on the build servers. If not, we can blame Heisenberg. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cmusphinx3 Short Description: Large vocabulary speech recognition in C Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 20:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] New: Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Summary: Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: a.badger at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress1.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress1-1.99.19-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: FuseCompress provides a mountable Linux filesystem which transparently compresses its content. Files stored in this filesystem are compressed on the fly and Fuse allows to create a transparent interface between compressed files and user applications. This package is only to enable users of fusecompress-1.x filesystems to upgrade to the newer on-disk format. Instructions for performing an upgrade are in README.fedora or the Fedora 12 release notes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252106.n8PL6vjM004430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-25 17:06:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is that the only benefit you could think of? To save 25KB of example files you > introduce a separate package (and corresponding repository metadata)? No. For having choose :) Ok, I'm turn it into doc subpackage, as we speak before. > You didn't understand or you didn't pay attention to what I wrote. > "Requires: botan-devel" is missing in ne7ssh-devel Thanks, fixed. About documentation you are right. I move first paragraph to the end. I think now it is more transparent for understanding. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm spec URL the same -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252118.n8PLIAfh007973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252118.n8PLI90F007940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com Depends on| |503591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252116.n8PLGEEc030936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252116.n8PLGCMq030851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com Depends on|503591 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 21:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514311] Review Request: ovirt-node-recipe - oVirt Node image recipe and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252124.n8PLOfsL008228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514311 --- Comment #3 from David Huff 2009-09-25 17:24:39 EDT --- New spec... http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-recipe.spec scratch build... https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708079 every thing looks good from output form rpmlint, one warning however its what we want...... ovirt-node-recipe.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized oVirt Node image recipe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252225.n8PMPsK9029225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lutter at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252226.n8PMQOt9029325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lutter at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252227.n8PMRgtc004997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lutter at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from David Lutterkort 2009-09-25 18:27:40 EDT --- Closed, since it's been done for a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: ace - Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252231.n8PMVAKw030833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Appliance |Review Request: ace - |Configuration Engine |Appliance Configuration | |Engine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: ace-console-wui - Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252231.n8PMVVoR030921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Web App for |Review Request: |Appliance Management |ace-console-wui - Web App | |for Appliance Management -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252234.n8PMYCSW007022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-25 18:34:10 EDT --- ============= REVIEW ============= [+] source files match upstream: 2e52d68a5f7f127c075a79b9ff3c26c9d9ebbd7b [1] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [2] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible: GPLv2 [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708170 [+] package installs properly. [3] rpmlint is silent: fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformTable.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/ByteOrder.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/LayerMap.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Lock.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileHeader.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/main_offline.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Compress.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/File.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformNONE.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileUtils.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressBZ2.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Transform.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRaw.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressLZO.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Memory.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRememberTimes.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Compress.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressBZ2.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformNONE.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/CompressedTable.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRawCompressed.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressLZO.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRememberTimes.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRawNormal.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/minilzo/minilzo.c fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRawNormal.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/File.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformXOR.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/minilzo/lzoconf.h fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Block.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/CompressedTable.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FuseCompress.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformXOR.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Mutex.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileRawCompressed.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Memory.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/CompressedMagic.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileUtils.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressGZ.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/LinearMap.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/LayerMap.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompress.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/CompressedMagic.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileHeader.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FuseCompress.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/Block.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/LinearMap.hpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileManager.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformTable.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompress.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/TransformCompressGZ.cpp fusecompress1-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fusecompress-1.99.19/src/FileManager.hpp 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 52 warnings. [+] final provides and requires are sane: fusecompress1 = 1.99.19-5.fc12 fusecompress1(x86-64) = 1.99.19-5.fc12 ---- fuse libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libfuse.so.2()(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.6)(64bit) libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.8)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmagic.so.1()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) librlog.so.5()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [3] file permissions are appropriate. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. ============= COMMENTS ============= 1) The name might be missleading as it isn't really fusecompress1 but kind of a migration tool, fusecompress1-migrate would be approriate to avoid confusion. 2) Use install rather than mv 3) Well the rpmlinit messages is clear, remove the +x from the source files. Besides this the package looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 22:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252259.n8PMxZKB004729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-25 18:59:33 EDT --- Good: * Naming follows the packaging guidelines * license is contained in README and README is included in the documentation * Spec file is readable * Source matches with source from canonical upstream * No locales * Not a library * No bundled libraries * Not relocatable * Directories created by package and no others are owned * No duplicate files listed * Permissions set properly * Proper %clean * Macros used consistently * Code, not content * No %doc files affect program runtime * No subpackages * Not a GUI app * rm -rf run properly at beginning of %install * Filenames are valid utf-8 * Package builds in koji * rpmlint clean * Tested that pigz compresses a file that can be decompressed by gzip and vice versa Needswork: * license should be "zlib" Providing you change the license when you import the package, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 23:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252313.n8PNDDrj008526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-25 19:13:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Good: > * Naming follows the packaging guidelines > * license is contained in README and README is included in the documentation > * Spec file is readable > * Source matches with source from canonical upstream > * No locales > * Not a library > * No bundled libraries > * Not relocatable > * Directories created by package and no others are owned > * No duplicate files listed > * Permissions set properly > * Proper %clean > * Macros used consistently > * Code, not content > * No %doc files affect program runtime > * No subpackages > * Not a GUI app > * rm -rf run properly at beginning of %install > * Filenames are valid utf-8 > * Package builds in koji > * rpmlint clean > * Tested that pigz compresses a file that can be decompressed by gzip and > vice versa > > Needswork: > * license should be "zlib" oh ok. > Providing you change the license when you import the package, this package is > APPROVED. Sure, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 23:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252314.n8PNEHLo016571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-25 19:14:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pigz Short Description: Parallel implementation of gzip Owners: drago01 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 23:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252317.n8PNHEJ1017639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-09-25 19:17:12 EDT --- Whoa, that works - thanks for the hint! I updated the spec file to make it build on all platforms now. Actually, the issue was the configure file which was building a plugin in cvs mode (while we obviously want release mode). Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/gstreamer-plugins-espeak.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm New Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708305 Would anybody mind taking on this quickly before we enter the freeze? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 23:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909252348.n8PNmiq5020275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-25 19:48:43 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! (In reply to comment #1) > 1) The name might be missleading as it isn't really fusecompress1 but kind of a > migration tool, fusecompress1-migrate would be approriate to avoid confusion. How about fusecompress_offline1 since that's the name of the utility it installs? > 2) Use install rather than mv mv is being used to rename two files that were installed by make install. (renaming the binary from fusecompress_offline to fusecompress_offline1 and the man page from fusecompress_offline.1 to fusecompress_offline1.1) This seems proper to me. Do you agree or is there some way to use install in that situation that's better? > 3) Well the rpmlinit messages is clear, remove the +x from the source files. Fixed SPEC: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1.spec SRPM: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1-1.99.19-6.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 01:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260127.n8Q1RBfk020109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 21:27:10 EDT --- editarea-0.8.1.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update editarea'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 01:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260128.n8Q1S131020406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 21:28:00 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lua-lunit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0515 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 01:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260127.n8Q1RpMZ020341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-25 21:27:44 EDT --- xls2csv-1.06-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xls2csv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0514 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260245.n8Q2juG4023288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 22:45:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260244.n8Q2iNLm022598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 22:44:22 EDT --- Can we get the go-head from FE_LEGAL before doing cvs here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260248.n8Q2meMQ016290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 22:48:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 02:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260247.n8Q2laxW023856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 22:47:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 04:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] New: Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit Alias: vim-perl-tt2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Summary: Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=830 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: vim-perl-tt2 enables syntax highlighting for the Perl Template-Toolkit, v2. * Contain Perl code in PERL/RAWPERL directive. (runtime sytax/perl.vim) * No folding * HTML syntax for including TT2 syntax. ( tt2html.vim / unfinished ) * Configurable START_TAG/END_TAG for your style. *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 04:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260416.n8Q4GjYo011989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-26 00:16:44 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 06:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260626.n8Q6QR4r024394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |17784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 06:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522933] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ Transport for Jabber Servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260625.n8Q6Pub5024304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522933 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 07:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522046] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber client for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260704.n8Q74ix9005937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|17784 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 08:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress1 - Utilities to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260807.n8Q87JTc015962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-26 04:07:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for reviewing! > > (In reply to comment #1) > > 1) The name might be missleading as it isn't really fusecompress1 but kind of a > > migration tool, fusecompress1-migrate would be approriate to avoid confusion. > > How about fusecompress_offline1 since that's the name of the utility it > installs? Yeah that makes sense. > > 2) Use install rather than mv > > mv is being used to rename two files that were installed by make install. > (renaming the binary from fusecompress_offline to fusecompress_offline1 and the > man page from fusecompress_offline.1 to fusecompress_offline1.1) This seems > proper to me. Do you agree or is there some way to use install in that > situation that's better? Sure as this is already installed using install again does not make much sense. > > 3) Well the rpmlinit messages is clear, remove the +x from the source files. > > Fixed > > SPEC: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1.spec > SRPM: > http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/fusecompress_offline1-1.99.19-6.fc11.src.rpm > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708383 Looks good now, "- Use install instead of mv" well you didn't do that but a changelog entry isn't a blocker ;) => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 08:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260820.n8Q8K5lc019528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-26 04:20:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > cvs done. Thanks, package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 08:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260839.n8Q8dmve013201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 09:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260914.n8Q9E5TY028170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-26 05:14:04 EDT --- 1. Since --without-tcl doesn't affect the build much, I have now removed it. 2. I have checked with Martin (upstream Debian), and he said he never needed Tcl support, so we can disable it. C, C++ is mostly used. So, I have disabled producing c++-lib/tcl/Makefile in AC_OUTPUT in the snacc-configure.patch. It should build fine, now. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/snacc.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/snacc-1.3-4.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11, EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708902 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708907 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 09:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260916.n8Q9GXU2019625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-26 05:16:32 EDT --- Adel, you miss the -p in the install command to preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 09:25:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260925.n8Q9Pbma030354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 09:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909260935.n8Q9ZanM032005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #22 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-26 05:35:34 EDT --- 1] use install -p to keep timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 2] cron, doesn't work from cron log: (CRON) bad username (/etc/cron.d/afraid-dyndns) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261011.n8QABVBs029420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-26 06:11:30 EDT --- 1] keep timestamp when performing install (add -p switch to install command) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 2] Source0 doesn't exists $ wget http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Source/CLconverter-0.4.8.tar.gz --2009-09-26 12:01:54-- http://www.information-hq.org/data/projects/CLconverter/Source/CLconverter-0.4.8.tar.gz Resolving www.information-hq.org... 69.174.114.214 Connecting to www.information-hq.org|69.174.114.214|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-09-26 12:01:54 ERROR 404: Not Found. 3] wrong format of Source0: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Spec_file_pieces_explained 4] Url tag is reffering to 404 page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261010.n8QAAvd3029346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-26 06:10:55 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output ../SPECS/gstreamer-plugins-espeak.spec:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. It can be safely ignored, as rpmlint thinks you are running configure here: sed -i 's/NANO=1/NANO=0/g' ./configure (rpmlint reports the warn even if you comment the line, you could check if a bug report has been already opened about that, i only found this one: bug 462360) However, if you modify the line to: sed -i 's/NANO=1/NANO=0/g' configure rpmlint doesnt complain anymore. As a side note, it's not a must, but maybe changing configure.ac and running autoconf before building is somewhat more elegant. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is LGPLv2+) OK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708305 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 4e4a2d2363c50be72ed5d26a319439c3 gst-plugins-espeak-0.3.3.tar.bz2 NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261027.n8QARFEQ031876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808 --- Comment #7 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-26 06:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Adel, you miss the -p in the install command to preserve timestamps Good catch, fixed in 2.1.5-3 thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261050.n8QAoKHJ012511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-09-26 06:50:18 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :) I'll adjust the sed line before importing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 10:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261058.n8QAwsbh004516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-09-26 06:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer-plugins-espeak Short Description: A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak Owners: sdz Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 11:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261158.n8QBwWSx023772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-26 07:58:31 EDT --- rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh-debuginfo.ppc: E: debuginfo-without-sources ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. I guess the warning about no documentation can be ignored since the base package contains license information and so on. All others should be checked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261209.n8QC9A9c016233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-26 08:09:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > 1] keep timestamp when performing install (add -p switch to install command) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Even if preserving timestamps was useful (Which it isn't the case), there are no timestamps which are useful to be preserved in this package. > 3] wrong format of Source0: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Spec_file_pieces_explained Except that the URL is invalid, I don't understand your point is. Jan, your comments were not useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261215.n8QCFXG8017701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-26 08:15:32 EDT --- Can you please upload the srpm to your FASUSERNAME.fedorapeople.org space please ? I'm having timeouts from your current host space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261233.n8QCXhDV020512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 08:33:40 EDT --- Done (in devel branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261240.n8QCeBO3030924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-26 08:40:11 EDT --- Hmm, you shouldn't need to obsolete the static library since it hasn't been in existence as a separate package and you just added the static provide a day ago. ** All issues have been fixed and this package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261238.n8QCcjDW030471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-26 08:38:44 EDT --- Hello, your package doesnt build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1709089 You need to BR: intltool (at least) Your devel package must also Requires: pkgconfig as it includes a .pc file Please not also that the spec file posted here has a small diff against the one included in your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 12:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261253.n8QCrrhM024130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 08:53:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Hmm, you shouldn't need to obsolete the static library since it hasn't been in > existence as a separate package and you just added the static provide a day > ago. I did it just to be sure that everything will be ok. :) > All issues have been fixed and this package has been > > APPROVED Good. I suppose that it's safe to close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225245] Merge Review: am-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261400.n8QE0l89002875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225245 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261401.n8QE1Vwe011977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225620] Merge Review: bluez-libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261407.n8QE7NdC012995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225620 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261406.n8QE6pIs012942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:06:50 EDT --- awesfx was returned to FEDORA, but this ticket has nothing with this new awesfx. I'm changing status to NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524451] Review Request: puppet-module-yum-development - Puppet module for yum (development) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261411.n8QEB7GM004711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524451 Todd Zullinger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmz at pobox.com --- Comment #1 from Todd Zullinger 2009-09-26 10:11:06 EDT --- I presume the idea is that the module files shipped in the package should not need to be edited? If not, would they be better placed in /usr/share/puppet/modules//? (Or .../modules/// if you have different content to ship in development, testing, and production versions of the module.) Then, users could create symlinks in /var/lib/puppet (or where ever) to meet their own environments layout. This might well be something to bring up on the puppet-dev or -users list. I know the common modules haven't gotten very far yet, but I'm sure other puppet users have given this problem some thought and it might be beneficial to try and come up with a somewhat standard layout for shipping module packages. Plus, then it could be documented on the puppet wiki and potentially save you some work writing a nice README.Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225685] Merge Review: device-mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261412.n8QECU7c013993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225685 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225682] Merge Review: desktop-printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261411.n8QEBXWU013858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225682 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:11:30 EDT --- It should be marked as dead (cvs tree shiould contain dead.package file with some description). Please, remove all sources and add dead.package file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225928] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-el In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261418.n8QEIfQB005976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225928 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225939] Merge Review: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261416.n8QEGmam005766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225939 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225845] Merge Review: gnu-crypto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261420.n8QEKR6b015715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225845 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225802] Merge Review: gjdoc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261428.n8QESeoD017054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225802 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225801] Merge Review: gimp-print In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261429.n8QETSHK017133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225801 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226328] Merge Review: pwlib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261433.n8QEXxNI008788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226328 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:33:57 EDT --- Please, remove all files, except dead.package, from devel cvs branch, because it still rebuilds sometimes (people sometimes got confused, because spec-file still exists). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226316] Merge Review: privoxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261436.n8QEaPab018555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226316 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525151] Review Request: CLconverter - A simple command line tool for converting units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261436.n8QEaNA4018523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525151 --- Comment #13 from Mario Basic 2009-09-26 10:36:22 EDT --- I was reorganizing my website so there was a little mess with the URLs. I have fixed the broken URLs, so I've repacked the package and these are the new links: SPEC URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Spec/CLconverter.spec SPRM URL: http://www.information-hq.org/download/projects/CLconverter/Srpm/CLconverter-0.4.8-2.fc11.src.rpm I think I got all previous remarks covered. If you have some more, please tell me so I can work on fixing them. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226149] Merge Review: mockobjects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261441.n8QEf6gu019251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226149 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226137] Merge Review: Mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261441.n8QEfdcC019336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226137 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226362] Merge Review: redhat-artwork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261451.n8QEpECx011510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226362 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:51:13 EDT --- Indeed, cvs tree should be cleaned up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520563] Review Request: rgmanager - Open Source HA Resource Group Failover for Red Hat Cluster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261449.n8QEnMnr010980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:49:20 EDT --- *** Bug 226369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226369] Merge Review: rgmanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261449.n8QEnLvP010956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226369 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:49:20 EDT --- BTW, it was splitted again from another package. :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 520563 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 197189] Review Request: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261457.n8QEvK5h012530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197189 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:57:17 EDT --- *** Bug 226809 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 14:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226809] Merge Review: fonts-sinhala In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261457.n8QEvJnQ012501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226809 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 10:57:17 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 197189 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261509.n8QF9CDm014442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226638 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WORKSFORME |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261514.n8QFEVqQ024374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #32 from Denis Arnaud 2009-09-26 11:14:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rmol New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261514.n8QFEuxq024432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #14 from Denis Arnaud 2009-09-26 11:14:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: R-msm New Branches: F12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261515.n8QFFZ7P015786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #16 from Denis Arnaud 2009-09-26 11:15:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: R-RM2 New Branches: F-12 Owners: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261516.n8QFGlsw015924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261516.n8QFGd21015889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261516.n8QFGZ8e024999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226507] Merge Review: tux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261522.n8QFMWk6016817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226507 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261525.n8QFPJRn026422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261521.n8QFLWa2025794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #40 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 11:21:31 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 428007 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261521.n8QFLYSc025847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #43 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 11:21:31 EDT --- *** Bug 226529 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261524.n8QFOh0v026086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 11:24:42 EDT --- I'm afraid, that review still needed (until you'll remove it from distribution completely). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261526.n8QFQi9a017513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261530.n8QFU2gB027160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 11:30:01 EDT --- Should be reopened, since it exists in all current Fedora distributions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226486] Merge Review: tetex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261533.n8QFX3wt018335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226486 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution|DEFERRED |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-26 11:33:02 EDT --- Since texlive was pushed to current distributions, this ticket should be closed as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261555.n8QFtoOu031374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 11:55:50 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261556.n8QFukOG022419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 11:56:46 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261556.n8QFuIIA031609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 11:56:17 EDT --- perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IPC-DirQueue-1.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 15:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525077] Review Request: perl-IPC-DirQueue - Disk-based many-to-many task queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261558.n8QFwDxi031791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525077 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261623.n8QGNM3j026823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo+ | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-26 12:23:19 EDT --- Looks good for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261643.n8QGhNv9030322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-26 12:43:22 EDT --- We have until the 29th to get this in for the F-12 beta freeze. Let's go! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261653.n8QGrCH7032024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-26 12:53:10 EDT --- It's wired...I'm still not able to build this package on koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1709529 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261659.n8QGxQnh009995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 12:59:25 EDT --- cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 17:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261744.n8QHiHkn007941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-26 13:44:16 EDT --- Hi, Source Url is missing. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for how to deal with this. rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Not sure if "rpmlint is silent" counts here :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 18:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261818.n8QIIuKZ023146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Bug 516059 depends on bug 516058, which changed state. Bug 516058 Summary: Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-26 14:18:54 EDT --- Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the webapp specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1709685 [x] Rpmlint output: dokuwiki.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 38, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > Okay since this is in a sed line. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Not present and not included. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. c75c4781b8698041c3c9b6b0fec2ac2e dokuwiki-2009-02-14b.tgz c75c4781b8698041c3c9b6b0fec2ac2e ../SOURCES/dokuwiki-2009-02-14b.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Koji build done. [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 18:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524423] Review Request: ciso - iso to cso converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261828.n8QISoiB015438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524423 --- Comment #3 from Pierre Dorbais 2009-09-26 14:28:49 EDT --- I made some changes Spec URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso.spec SRPM URL: http://chdorblog.free.fr/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint RPMS/i386/ciso-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SRPMS/ciso-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. chdorb at chdorb-desktop:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint SPECS/ciso.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 18:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261836.n8QIaD4m016949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-26 14:36:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: > > ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless > ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless Hm, I don't see this warnings. What version of rpmlint you are using? $ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.90-1.fc11.noarch > ne7ssh-debuginfo.ppc: E: debuginfo-without-sources I have deep search but nothing found relevant this. Grep all files by "strip" also does no results. So, really this is applicable to library, not executable binary? > ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation I think it is may be safely ignored. > ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel Yes. And it also commented in spec. So, it come from -examples subpackage what you suggest merge with -doc. I do that. But examples required ne7ssh for compilation. So, no error there. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 18:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261857.n8QIvV9U029995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-26 14:57:31 EDT --- > ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel I've thought you're a guy who preaches of "flexibility". What flexibility do you gain by making a separate noarch -doc package strictly require two -devel packages and their dependency-chain? None. It has become less flexible. Technically, ne7ssh-doc does not need ne7ssh-devel for anything. The examples and a build environment are fully optional. Somebody who actually wants to compile stuff will need to install the development group's packages first, anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 19:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261938.n8QJcTXA027657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 15:38:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 19:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261936.n8QJaarO027426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 15:36:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 19:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261935.n8QJZpRU027346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 15:35:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 19:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261937.n8QJb3c3004342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 15:37:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 19:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261950.n8QJojaA006855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-26 15:50:44 EDT --- Ok, I will take a look later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 20:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262013.n8QKDXv1011316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 16:13:30 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv2) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin OK - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews). Issues: 1. rpmlint says: pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0775 pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0775 I think we can ignore those. pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log Can be ignored per comment in the spec. pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Can be ignored. 2. Some non blocking suggestions: Might add a '-p' to your install lines to preserve timestamps of the sources? Currently it's pointless to add smp_mflags, but if there are ever more source files to compile it might be worth considering. I see no blockers at all, so this package is APPROVED. Sorry for the long delay here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 20:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226657] Merge Review: xrestop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262022.n8QKMB7g003866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226657 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 16:22:09 EDT --- As far as I can tell you've never commited to this package, do you still want to maintain it? Items 1 and 5 are outstanding still... all the others have been fixed by other people over the years. The buildroot does meet the guidelines, even though it's not a standard one. The comments are not a blocker. I guess I will go ahead and APPROVE this review, but it seems odd to have a package maintained by someone who has never once commited to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 20:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:34:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262034.n8QKYckt005970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #34 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-09-26 16:34:37 EDT --- Approved package because Mamoru Tasaka have checked it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 20:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262043.n8QKhKFm007443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #2 from Mads Villadsen 2009-09-26 16:43:19 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. I updated the spec file and src.rpm, and I tested that it actually builds in koji this time. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 20:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262045.n8QKj2HW017033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #1 from Mads Villadsen 2009-09-26 16:45:01 EDT --- Updated the spec file to contain a BuildRequires on intltool since the package contains translations. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler-0.2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 21:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262104.n8QL4EZD011323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-26 17:04:13 EDT --- This is imported and built. Closing now. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 21:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262116.n8QLGOTP024958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-26 17:16:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362781) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362781) Patch to the mod_perl spec file Here's a patch that removes all the errors that can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 21:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262148.n8QLm8Tb024955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 17:48:07 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 21:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262148.n8QLm3qo001786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-26 17:48:02 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 23:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262336.n8QNaObP001392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-26 19:36:23 EDT --- # yum install sysreport (clip) Package sysreport is obsoleted by sos, trying to install sos-1.8-16.fc11.noarch instead Package sos-1.8-16.fc11.noarch already installed and latest version Nothing to do ** The package just needs to be removed from any current distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 23:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] New: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Summary: Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: giallu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/sysprof.spec SRPM URL: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/sysprof-1.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sysprof is a sampling CPU profiler for Linux that uses a kernel module to profile the entire system, not just a single application. Sysprof handles shared libraries and applications do not need to be recompiled. In fact they don't even have to be restarted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 23:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909262339.n8QNdtPg025181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-26 19:39:54 EDT --- This package was in Fedora but moved to RPMFusion when kmods were banned. Now it does not need anymore a kernel module so I'd like to move it back to Fedora. Old review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 01:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270130.n8R1UNpi006255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-26 21:30:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362799) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362799) patch to make EMBOSS use system pcre Fixed and working (it compiles) patch to use system pcre attached. Please test if the software is working correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 01:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270135.n8R1ZoVA031510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-26 21:35:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > All the rpmlint errors have been eliminated, the following warnings remain: > EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest > /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/lib/client.jar https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#class-path-in-manifest > EMBOSS-java.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest > /usr/share/EMBOSS/jemboss/lib/axis/commons-logging.jar Isn't this the same as ant-commons-logging or jakarta-commons-logging, which are in Fedora already? If yes, then this needs to be fixed to use the system-provided package. If not, see above. > EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libeplplot.so.3.2.7 > exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 It shouldn't do that. Please explain that to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 04:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219112] Review Request: mmsrip - mms stream recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270400.n8R409qF018249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219112 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 04:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize-GZip OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The WWW::Mechanize::GZip module tries to fetch a URL by requesting gzip-compression from the webserver. If the response contains a header with 'Content-Encoding: gzip', it decompresses the response in order to get the original (uncompressed) content. This module will help to reduce bandwith fetching webpages, if supported by the webeserver. If the webserver does not support gzip-compression, no decompression will be made. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1710108 *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 04:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525914] New: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com Alias: perl-Net-GitHub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-GitHub OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 525913 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Net-GitHub.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Net-GitHub-0.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GitHub (http://github.com) is a popular git host; this package is a Perl API for working with GitHub users and repositories. *rt-0.10_01 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 05:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270518.n8R5ImBu031733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #11 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-27 01:18:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Can you please upload the srpm to your FASUSERNAME.fedorapeople.org space > please ? > I'm having timeouts from your current host space. Done - I forgot that I had access to that service now. Spec URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/avra/avra-1.2.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 06:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525914] Review Request: perl-Net-GitHub - Perl interface for github.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270623.n8R6NsWF032686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525914 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 06:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270624.n8R6O0fI032722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525914(perl-Net-GitHub) Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 06:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270639.n8R6dLXr002819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-27 02:39:20 EDT --- *md5sum source ok *license ok *spec legible *directory ownership ok *tests present & working *utf-8 ok *rpmlint ok *naming ok *guidelines ok *noarch package however there is comment about source of information for license decision, please remove it, it is not needed. approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 07:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270704.n8R74bon006715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #5 from David Timms 2009-09-27 03:04:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm not sure if it's expected, but it does not seem to > work for KDE; the desktop file causes an application/vnd.ms-tnef type to > appear, but it has no associated application. OK, with various people's help and lots'o'messing around, the package now also includes a kde4 servicemenu .desktop file (which is different, and lives in a different location to gnome). Also, added running of the make test, which seems to succeed according to the build log, but not really sure if the spec command is right/suitable. http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef-1.4.6-2.fc11.src.rpm Hopefully the servicemenu desktop file works on typical kde user's systems. Not sure about how to own the .desktop file; I don't want to pull in kde (kde-filesystem) or gnome by installing a command line program, so what is the best approach ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 08:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270850.n8R8oIV1003817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 09:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270904.n8R94IAG028289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-27 05:04:17 EDT --- rpmlint output: sysprof.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/60-sysprof.rules sysprof.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sysprof-1.1.2/README 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Convert README to UTF8 with the time stamp preserving version in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 ** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - Instead of %dir %{_datadir}/sysprof %{_datadir}/sysprof/sysprof.glade I'd use just %{_datadir}/sysprof/ KISS MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add AUTHORS. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. NEEDSWORK - Drop the vendor tag from desktop-file-install. Or if you want to build for EPEL, just use --vendor="". MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Fix the issues before import to CVS, the package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 09:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270934.n8R9YmWV001034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #23 from Erick Calder 2009-09-27 05:34:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > 1] use install -p to keep timestamps > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps fixed. there are a couple of files that needed -C which is mutually exclusive with -p so I left those as is > 2] cron, doesn't work > from cron log: (CRON) bad username (/etc/cron.d/afraid-dyndns) yikes! I don't know how that got passed my testing (some testing I did). I've fixed it, it's all ready to be looked at again (available at the same place but release -2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 09:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 05:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909270952.n8R9qivC014087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-27 05:52:43 EDT --- Some other small issues, the doc dir under /usr/share/doc must be versioned /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}, and you should remove the generic INSTALL file which is irrelevant. Which is your packager account? If you have one i'll take the review, otherwise i cannot sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525389] Review Request: madwimax - Driver for mobile WiMAX devices based on Samsung CMC-730 chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271011.n8RABxvS017376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525389 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedoraRemix) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271015.n8RAFFe9017993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-27 06:15:14 EDT --- Thanks Steve for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dokuwiki Short Description: Standards compliant simple to use wiki Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271012.n8RAC0QM017409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |525389 Bug 496433 depends on bug 517983, which changed state. Bug 517983 Summary: Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525927] New: Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector-1.0-7.fc10.src.rpm Description: Incollector is an application to collect various kinds of information (like notes, conversation logs, quotes, serial numbers, source code, web addresses, words). All the entries can be tagged, so you can find them very easily. There are also search folders which allows you to search for entries by specified criteria. You can also export (and import, of course) entries to an external file. This is a review for a orphaned package last updated 5 month's ago. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers I'm the new maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271022.n8RAMQv1019667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-27 06:22:25 EDT --- This package is in good shape, you only have the same issue as the lib about the /usr/share/doc dir; and where did you get the scriptlet to update the icon cache? The version here is somewhat different: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Archive:PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache#Existing_Guideline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525929] New: Review Request: youtube-dl - Small command-line program to download videos from YouTube Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: youtube-dl - Small command-line program to download videos from YouTube https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525929 Summary: Review Request: youtube-dl - Small command-line program to download videos from YouTube Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rafalzaq at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/youtube-dl/youtube-dl.spec SRPM URL: http://rafalzaq.fedorapeople.org/review/youtube-dl/youtube-dl-2009.09.13-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Small command-line program to download videos from YouTube. Note that this package has been orphaned and haven't been updated for more than three months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 10:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 06:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271037.n8RAboGh022298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-09-27 06:37:49 EDT --- Some minor beautifications: - consistently using rpm macros - don't define and clean build root (not needed in F10 and greater) Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 12:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271203.n8RC3bNp026673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #4 from Mads Villadsen 2009-09-27 08:03:36 EDT --- The doc issue is now fixed, and I have gotten rid of the INSTALL file. My packager account name is maxx. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 12:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271203.n8RC3u9P026724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #3 from Mads Villadsen 2009-09-27 08:03:55 EDT --- I fixed the doc issue. http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler.spec http://krakoa.dk/fedora/winwrangler-0.2.3-3.fc11.src.rpm I get the icon cache scriptlet from here (which does seem to be the autoritative place): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 13:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271316.n8RDGd9d006537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #13 from David Timms 2009-09-27 09:16:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Can we get this approved, I really want to get it out in Fedora 12. First step is reviewed / improved ... (In reply to comment #11) I don't think I have enough experience to be approving security related packages in Fedora. However, some initial nits: 1. package name differs from web page, so maybe fix the web page from (System-Config-Selinx) ! 2. repeated requires: Requires: selinux-policy Requires: selinux-policy >= 3.6.28-4 -> which is it ?, I don't think it makes sense to have both. 3. Can you confirm that this package replaces policycoreutils-gui ? Does the new package include all the old package's functionality ? 4. The normal place to put the python_sitelib call is at the top of the .spec, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#System_Architecture 5. description: typo in (graphcial). Perhaps instead of just repeating short names/acronyms, we could have something like spelling out the acronym during first stating of it: --- This package contains two graphical tools for adjusting the mandatory access control security settings, as implemented by Security Enhanced Linux (SELinux). system-config-selinux provides an interface for configuring and managing SELinux, while selinux-polgengui is used to generate SELinux policy modules. --- -> feel free to improve upon that ! 6. For consistency, keep the two-line breaks between sections (for post, clean files, install) 7. Nice to see lines like ln... to be split over two lines, limiting spec to be mostly <= 80 chars wide. 8. avoid use of tab char, space is easier to peruse. 9. changelog: is not in required format: - space between * and first char of date. - space between - and item text - version-release is not included for any entries. (think the space is missing as well, making those entries look weird. - subprocesss ! - lines longer than 80chars. 10. how were the labelling problems fixed (were they added to the -targeted policy) ? 11. Is there any doc files that need to be included ? 12. Who is going to own this package going forward, since it seems the reporter is having trouble keeping the spec file consistent with itself, let alone the fedora packaging standards, is this a time problem ? 13. files: -config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/ -> are people expected to make changes to configuration in /usr/share ? -%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/org.fedoraproject.selinux.config.conf -> is this a file that needs the noreplace, ie are users expected to adjust this (potentially) ? 14. gui tools require icons, are some included, do some need to be requested of the artwork project ? I haven't explicitly checked Provides nor BuildRequires. Hopefully this helps move the review a little further on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 13:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271330.n8RDUxsi019722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Naoki IIMURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-27 09:30:58 EDT --- Hi, I've forgotten to mention that this is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 14:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271420.n8REKEnn027396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-27 10:20:13 EDT --- Thanks Jussi, really appreciated! I'm doing a mock build to double check I didn't break anything with the last changes before importing in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 14:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271428.n8RESeP7017818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-27 10:28:39 EDT --- Soeren, can you help me refine the description of the package since it does not depend anymore on the kmod? additionally, are we still limited to the x86 archs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 14:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271445.n8REjVYD031862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #5 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-09-27 10:45:30 EDT --- Something like this maybe: Sysprof is a sampling CPU profiler for Linux that collects accurate, high-precision data and provides efficient access to the sampled calltrees. I think we are probably still limited to the x86 architectures for now. In principle, it should work as well as it does on x86-64, but since I'm not really happy with the state of userspace stacktracing on x86-64, I'd like to avoid claiming support for further architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 14:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271458.n8REwmLh022520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Pardy 2009-09-27 10:58:47 EDT --- replies to comment #13 following spec and srpm stuff Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools: system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. 1. I made the project name on the wiki lowercase (you can explain to me why that was your first complaint later) 2. fixed 3. yes otherwise I wouldn't have included it in the spec. 4. misunderstood the meaning of "top", fixed. 5. Switched to your description. Maybe I'll think of something better later. 6. 2 line breaks between all sections now. 7. done. 8. fixed. 9. fixed. 10. yes added to policy, noted in comment now. 11. Not yet, I'll submit a docs package when there are. 12. I will maintain ownership. 13. yes this is why I included them in the spec. 14. icon's are included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271502.n8RF2RWm002272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271502.n8RF2BZp002226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271522.n8RFMdpV026598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-09-27 11:22:38 EDT --- Just a short comment on this review: The functionality of http://svn2.assembla.com/svn/SABnzbd/trunk/main/sabnzbd/utils/json.py is provided by python-json which is in Fedora already. You should try and use that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271522.n8RFM36a026509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-27 11:22:01 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is LGPLv3) OK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1711273 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. bfdc73e68e9adbe0d506d31a25862914 gtkhotkey-0.2.1.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK - Header files must be in a -devel package (devel package present) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) OK - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271540.n8RFekw6008292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-27 11:40:45 EDT --- Obsoletes: up2date < 5.0.0 Provides: up2date = %{version} this is wrong sinve version is less that what is obsoleted the Provides should be 5.0.0 %files section should be much cleaner %clean should just be rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress_offline1 - Utility to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271542.n8RFgCqo008547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |fusecompress1 - Utilities |fusecompress_offline1 - |to help migrate off of |Utility to help migrate off |fusecompress-1.x |of fusecompress-1.x --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-27 11:42:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fusecompress_offline1 Short Description: Utility to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x Owners: toshio lkundrak lmacken Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 15:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271552.n8RFqlFu031590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-27 11:52:46 EDT --- Hmm, on x86-64 I get $ sysprof Time to populate 468.337158 perf_counter_open: Function not implemented when I click on 'Start'. I get the same thing using sudo. What's the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271606.n8RG6QST001452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-27 12:06:25 EDT --- By the way, I'd appreciate if you could review bug #524888, which is a rather simple Java package (ant specfile template) which I need in order to update jmol to the new release series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271610.n8RGAZhR002218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-27 12:10:34 EDT --- QUEUED - The package MUST successfully compile and build The package needs gtk2-devel >= 2.17.11 to build. (Commit here: http://osdir.com/ml/svn-commits-list/2009-09/msg00926.html) I cannot build the package locally as i have no functional rawhide here and latest version for F-11 is 2.16.6. To build in koji you will have to wait for libgtkhotkey to be pushed in. QUEUED - rpmlint output OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is GPLv3) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun QUEUED - The package MUST successfully compile and build Must wait dependency to be pushed to build in koji OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. bfb69578d335a2988f4018e3a186e590 winwrangler-0.2.3.tar.gz OK - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (find_lang used) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' NA - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file (desktop file included in SRPM as Source1 and installed correctly, gtk-update-icon-cache used) OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271628.n8RGSPWi004925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #15 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-27 12:28:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > rpmlint reports some errors and a warning: > > > > ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless > > ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the > > NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless > Hm, I don't see this warnings. What version of rpmlint you are using? > > $ rpm -q rpmlint > rpmlint-0.90-1.fc11.noarch I'm using the same version. But you should make yourself familiar with mock. It ensures that you have a clean build area. If you are really really unsure about your build you can try using koji. But before that you should use mock. I did a built for you on koji and still get the following errors/warnings: ne7ssh.ppc: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh.src: E: description-line-too-long applications. You can now use the NetSieben's API, instead of spending countless ne7ssh-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. > http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ne7ssh/ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Whenever you change something at your package then do a release bump. I have two versions of your package (release 3): $ md5sum ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm* 61b1be340be8e6572101f6a0d293ac3d ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm bc8156ac376386796d5ef319b582d6f1 ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm-BUMP_RELEASE_FORGOTTEN $ rpmdiff ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm ne7ssh-1.3.1-3.fc11.src.rpm-BUMP_RELEASE_FORGOTTEN S.5.......T ne7ssh.spec $ diff -u a/ne7ssh.spec b/ne7ssh.spec ... -cmake . +CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" cmake . ... This is the reason why the new package does not complain about debuginfo-without-sources anymore. Btw. it is also good practice to include the output of rpmlint everytime you create a new package (I forget that sometimes too). This helps you to find bugs before posting the new version and also helps reviewers etc. as a first impression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271629.n8RGTOfD005090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271629.n8RGTMcO005067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-27 12:29:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip Short Description: Fetch compressed webpages Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271639.n8RGdP2T017208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 12:39:22 EDT --- I'll review it. Bj?rn, are you still here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271649.n8RGnYhM018750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #13 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-09-27 12:49:33 EDT --- I'm here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress_offline1 - Utility to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271653.n8RGrGKo019476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525814] Review Request: fusecompress_offline1 - Utility to help migrate off of fusecompress-1.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271653.n8RGr2ar019412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525814 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-27 12:53:01 EDT --- cvs done; New package built for rawhide. thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 16:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271658.n8RGwcZS020350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #8 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-09-27 12:58:36 EDT --- Jussi, is that on a 2.6.31 kernel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271700.n8RH0kdk010163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 13:00:45 EDT --- unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Bj?rn Persson. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271701.n8RH15Xx010225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 13:01:04 EDT --- unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Bj?rn Persson. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271701.n8RH1iMM021092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 13:01:43 EDT --- unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Bj?rn Persson. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271711.n8RHBhAT022926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-27 13:11:41 EDT --- No, on 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271715.n8RHFFv5023490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-27 13:15:13 EDT --- Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271715.n8RHFKBo023524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-27 13:15:19 EDT --- Some random commends: * License statement of the spec file itself - It is not forbidden, however ususally spec files in Fedora packages don't contain license statements on the spec files themselves. Moreover: -------------------------------------------------------- # Copyright (c) 2001-2009 John Graham-Cumming # This file is part of POPFile -------------------------------------------------------- - Why is the copyright holder of your spec file not you? - Is this spec file really "a part of POPFile"? * Naming/EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) - The release number of the spec file should have integer value except for the cases written in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release - And usually adding %{?dist} tag is preferred. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * Vendor - Vendor tag must be removed on Fedora. This tag is automatically imported on Fedora build server. * Exclusiveos - I don't think you have to write this explicitly. * Perl related packaging treatment https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl Some notes: - "Requires: perl >= 5.8.1" does almost nothing because Fedora's perl rpm has epoch: ------------------------------------------------------ $ rpm -q --qf '%{epoch}:%{name}-%{version}-%{release}\n' perl 4:perl-5.10.0-82.fc12 ------------------------------------------------------ - And anyway I don't think this is needed because even Fedora 10 (the oldest branch currently supported on Fedora) uses perl 5.10. - For perl module dependency, please write virtual Provides names instead of rpm names directly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------ popfile.src: W: strange-permission popfile 0775 popfile.src: W: strange-permission start_popfile.sh 0775 ------------------------------------------------------ - All files in srpm should have 0644 permission. * %setup/%build/%install - Umm... I think your current spec file is unneededly verbose and redundant. While listing %files section verbosely can be accepted, is there any reason you don't prefer to write like below? (all commentes removed for now) ------------------------------------------------------ %prep %setup -q -c find . -type f | xargs chmod 0644 %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} . %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE2} . %build %install %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} %{__cp} -a * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{__rm} -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/popfile %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name} %{__install} -p -m 644 stopwords $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name} %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_localstatedir}/log/%{name} %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir} %{__install} -p -m 755 popfile $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/popfile %{__install} -p -m 755 start_popfile.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/ ------------------------------------------------------ Some notes: - %setup recognizes zip file. "-c" option on setup creates the diretory beforehand when unpacking source. Also "-q" option is preferred to suppress messages when unpacking source. - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option (or "-a" for "cp") to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - If you want to close macros with {}, please do so consistently (i.e. please use %{name}) * Initscripts treatment Please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets Some notes: - Some Requires(post) or so are missing - Why your spec file stopps daemon every time this package is upgraded (on %pre)? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax ! Also please check %postun scriptlet example (and the usage of condrestart) - Please use either "/sbin/service popfile" style or "%{_initrddir}/popfile" style consistently - Currently using %{_initddir} macro instead of %{_initrddir} is preferred: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem - rpmlint warns: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- popfile.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/popfile ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Usually service should be enabled by admin manually afterwards and should not be enabled by default. So popfile initscript should have ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 80 20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- And "Default-Start", "Default-Stop" lines should be removed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_Default-Start:_line * %files - Now %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred on Fedora. - By the way ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/Classifier %{_datadir}/%{name}/Classifier/* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- can be unified as ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/%{name}/Classifier/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The latter %files entry contains both the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/Classifier itself and all files/directories/etc under the directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271717.n8RHHXu8012843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #10 from S?ren Sandmann Pedersen 2009-09-27 13:17:32 EDT --- It requires 2.6.31 to work, so there should be a dependency on that I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271721.n8RHLJOY024533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 13:21:18 EDT --- I don't know much about Ada and GNAT, but you hardcoded %_GNAT_project_dir to /usr/lib/gnat. Even on 64-bit architectures. Is it intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271735.n8RHZqYS015577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-27 13:35:51 EDT --- If I delete the json.py from sabnzbd and Require: python-json and then symlink in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/json.py, that ought to work, yes? It looks like (from the diff) sabnzbd's copy of json.py is a subset of the functionality of the original json.py (it strips reading and some types of writing that it doesn't use). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271737.n8RHbjD7026708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #16 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-09-27 13:37:45 EDT --- Yes, that's intentional. That's where GNAT looks for project files by default, even on 64-bit architectures. (Well, at least on x86_64. I don't have a PPC64 to test on.) It could be argued that /usr/share/gnat would be a better location but that would require a change in GNAT. I made an RPM macro so that it will be easy to change for all Ada libraries if the location changes in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271744.n8RHiLJL027666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-27 13:44:20 EDT --- Hm, weird, it's building ok locally. Maybe a missing BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271743.n8RHhAfv027541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mads Villadsen 2009-09-27 13:43:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgtkhotkey Short Description: Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications Owners: maxx Branches: F-11 InitialCC: maxx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271754.n8RHsqHI029304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-27 13:54:51 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 17:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271754.n8RHsA08018139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-27 13:54:09 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271804.n8RI437j019784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-27 14:04:02 EDT --- Here's an updated summary; though now we deviate from upstream. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-common-sense.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-common-sense-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271816.n8RIGtXP021923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-27 14:16:54 EDT --- Ok, understood. Here is my REVIEW: +/- rpmlint isn't silent. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm fedora-gnat-project-common.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ However this warning may be safely ignored (keeping in mind your notes about common place for GNAT projects). + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. +/- The spec file for the package is legible, except the dirty trick with _GNAT_project_dir (fortunately, this would go away then the package hits Fedora packages collection). + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2.tar.gz* f4f63a0cb90193966e21af236b07fd63b725e80617c26cba98b082ad98067146 fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2.tar.gz f4f63a0cb90193966e21af236b07fd63b725e80617c26cba98b082ad98067146 fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (ppc) + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code or permissible content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271819.n8RIJd87000805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #8 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-27 14:19:38 EDT --- > ! license. GPL file has GPLv2, while debian/copyright has GPLv2+ > no files has license information, could you ping upstream about this? README says "etckeeper is licensed under version 2 or greater of the GNU GPL" > ! own all dirs. > + add %dir /etc/etckeeper, it's not include. > + add /etc/bash_completion.d too (a bit strange, seems to be normal though) > + /usr/lib/yum-plugins and /etc/yum/pluginconf.d: this is possible yum dep, > however I am tempted to relax that. Fixed. I updated the package to 0.41: http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/specs/etckeeper.spec http://codewiz.org/pub/fedora/source/etckeeper-0.41-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271829.n8RITwOf002350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew | |.edu) | --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-27 14:29:57 EDT --- Approved Yes, we deviate from upstream, however, "The summary should be a short and concise description of the package." (ref: packaging guidelines). Previous summary didn't told user what to expect from package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271828.n8RISESM002193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 Bug 520479 depends on bug 523972, which changed state. Bug 523972 Summary: voms ABI was wrong for versions 1.9.8 to 1.9.11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523972 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-27 14:28:13 EDT --- Hi, All the blocking bugs on this are now resolved and a koji build is now quite possible: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1711749 really looking for a review of this. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271832.n8RIWjPt003179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271835.n8RIZIf5024802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-27 14:35:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-common-sense Short Description: Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271838.n8RIcEts004221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-27 14:38:13 EDT --- rpmlint output empty other than a known bug fixed in an upcoming rpmlint. globus-gass-cache-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on globus-gass-cache/globus-gass-cache-libs/libglobus-gass-cache. Other than a very "boring" globus package that is built in standard way and only contains libs. APPROVED Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - "Common sense" Perl defaults In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271853.n8RIrdfl027883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-common-sense - Save a |perl-common-sense - "Common |tree AND a kitten, use |sense" Perl defaults |common::sense! | --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-27 14:53:38 EDT --- Heh. Another thing to fix :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-common-sense Short Description: "Common sense" Perl defaults Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - "Common sense" Perl defaults In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271854.n8RIsJEN006865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 18:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271851.n8RIpeW4006599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-27 14:51:38 EDT --- Next Release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.14-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 19:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492019] Review Request: cfourcc - Change the FOURCC of an MPEG4 or DivX video. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271933.n8RJXxub002060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492019 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 19:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909271940.n8RJefs9015019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-27 15:40:40 EDT --- @Bj?rn, Did you have create a FAS account. If Peter is not a sponsor, I can do this job for him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272112.n8RLCee7032711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #31 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-27 17:12:38 EDT --- New build with patches for the new nbtk-1.2 and adding Bastien's g-v-c patch. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.6-2.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1711917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:17:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272117.n8RLHbPm002138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 --- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-27 17:17:36 EDT --- I didn't put an explicit dependency on 2.6.31 because I planned to import this just in rawhide, but looks like it's probably a good idea to add it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272121.n8RLLi4F024711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272121.n8RLLIQZ003621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |giallu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272127.n8RLRhS6026570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2009-09-27 17:27:38 EDT --- Enabled arches build on rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1711941 rpmlint looks OK: rpmlint pure-* pure-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. All other issues from above have been addressed so APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 21:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272128.n8RLSCUM005838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #19 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-27 17:28:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I don't know much about Ada and GNAT, (In reply to comment #17) > APPROVED. The combination of comment #15 and #17 makes me sad. Also, I stand to what I said in comment #7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 22:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272200.n8RM0qNx015494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-09-27 18:00:50 EDT --- Thanks Peter, for the review and for sponsoring me. Jochen, my FAS username is rombobeorn. Ralf, since you never replied to comment #8 I assumed that you were satisfied with how I addressed your concerns. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-gnat-project-common Short Description: Files shared by Ada libraries Owners: rombobeorn Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 22:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272213.n8RMDisC007235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #15 from David Timms 2009-09-27 18:13:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > 1. I made the project name on the wiki lowercase (you can explain to me why > that was your first complaint later) Either the package name or the web site got the name wrong as System-Config-Selinx, rather than System-Config-Selinux ; I assumed it was the web site, but wanted to clarify, I see you fixed the spelling anyhow. I haven't performed build, functionality, or md5sum checks yet, will do that maybe in the next day. > 6. 2 line breaks between all sections now. That looks good, except the changelog entries (they are all one section, and typically have single line breaks between each entry, like the break between sept27 and previous). Also, the version on each changelog entry is allowed to be one of: * Tue Aug 24 2004 Alexander Larsson - 2.7.4-2 * Thu Aug 19 2004 Alex Larsson 2.7.4-1 see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs You can leave this until there is more to update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 22:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 18:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272227.n8RMRhE3011959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-27 18:27:42 EDT --- SPEC looks good, just some remarks: * You should refine the steps needed to create the tarball, the tar command is not correct and I had to do a "cvs login" before the "cvs checkout". this is correctly explained in https://vecmath.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectSource. * I can't match the md5sum of the tarball, that's probably becasue xz is still a bit in "flux" or you used some options. If the former, please consider using the regular gz compression. I diffed the sources and thay match though. * please consider adding the "cvs" string the release field, it looks like a "SHOULD" in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages but often explicit is better than implicit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 23:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272304.n8RN4NZc032702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #12 from Julian G 2009-09-27 19:04:22 EDT --- I updated the "old" files. Is it ok for you if I update release number and changelog next time? I didn't do it because I thought it's not a "release". If it's necessary to do it this time, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 23:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272307.n8RN7Rum000960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-27 19:07:26 EDT --- Yes, please do increment Release and add changelog entries, makes it easier to track changes and progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 23:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272310.n8RNALLh022716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #14 from Colin Coe 2009-09-27 19:10:21 EDT --- Julian, as an example, http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec is an example of a package I recently had reviewed. Note the changelog entries track the issues raised by the review. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 27 23:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909272340.n8RNeCqg030867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ktorrent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 00:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280025.n8S0PnY8022862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-27 20:25:47 EDT --- Thanks - imported and building in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 00:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280025.n8S0PoeD022887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523886, which changed state. Bug 523886 Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 01:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280124.n8S1OwY2009482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-27 21:24:56 EDT --- As often is the case when IANAL, I believe I firmly placed my foot in my mouth here, and based on precedent of other similar games in fedora, I'm dropping FE-LEGAL blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 02:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280241.n8S2fnY0004598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-27 22:41:47 EDT --- Thanks for testing. Now that we have all the haskell-platform packages in dist-f12 I rebuilt HTTP and cgi for the new network package. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Sep 28 2009 Jens Petersen - 2009.2.0.2-2 - add all the buildrequires (#523883) - create ghcpkgdir since metapackage - nothing in bindir Built for me in koji just now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 03:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280342.n8S3gVwc011658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #5 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-27 23:42:29 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm haskell-platform.src: W: strange-permission haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2.tar.gz 0600 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ~ $ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-devel-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-doc-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-prof-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm haskell-platform.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haskell-platform-devel haskell-platform.x86_64: E: no-binary ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-haskell-platform-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the haskell-platform library. ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haskell-platform-devel ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. I think that the package summary and description need fixing, since they're currently boilerplate and haskell-platform is different than other Haskell packages. Other errors and warnings are generally fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. Subject to the minor edits at the beginning of this review, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] New: Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-systemu.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-systemu-1.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: systemu can be used on any platform to return status, stdout, and stderr of any command. Modeled the package after rubygem-json.spec and rubygem-rake.spec. Looking for review and a sponsor as this is my first package submission. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] New: Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-extlib.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-extlib-0.9.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Support library for DataMapper and Merb. Modeled the package after rubygem-json.spec and rubygem-rake.spec. Looking for review. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280421.n8S4L4on003598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280420.n8S4KpGU023561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280425.n8S4P7FY024755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-28 00:25:06 EDT --- Should mention I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 as well at the same time. These are my first two packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280428.n8S4SegY005386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-28 00:28:39 EDT --- Would you tell us why you want to add non-gem support (i.e. create_symlink and so on part) for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280438.n8S4c4Jd027261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #19 from Peter Hutterer 2009-09-28 00:38:00 EDT --- FWIW, I recommend adding the following patch to the rpm before distribution. Otherwise users may start to rely on wrong gconf keys. http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gpointing-device-settings/commit/?id=d39cf65fceb7abb4c5db241bb261f4e0f9eeb8a8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280456.n8S4uRU0031247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-28 00:56:24 EDT --- Thanks Bryan and congratulations - looks like we have reached the goal! I'll fix the rpmlint before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 05:00:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280500.n8S50TTR032201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-28 01:00:28 EDT --- No specific requirement, I assumed it would increase usability of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 05:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280512.n8S5CX0O014404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-28 01:12:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: haskell-platform Short Description: Standard Haskell distribution Owners: petersen, bos Branches: devel F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280616.n8S6GXPO026045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 02:16:32 EDT --- ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280626.n8S6Q9Lt027474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 02:26:08 EDT --- ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280629.n8S6Tuna019388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-28 02:29:54 EDT --- Fixed the above. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vecmath.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280657.n8S6vCdt000311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-28 02:57:10 EDT --- *md5sum of source/srpm ok *rpmlint clean *license ok *directory ownership ok *naming ok *packaging guidelines ok *working ok *legible spec *noarch package *koji builds: F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712414 - OK F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712416 - OK *utf-8 filenames - ok conclusion: approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 07:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280700.n8S70BQM024836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-28 03:00:08 EDT --- david, you have to set fedora.cvs=? to request cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 07:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280710.n8S7AlJR026710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-28 03:10:20 EDT --- Okay, afaik massbranch today?! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fife Short Description: Cross platform game creation framework Owners: cassmodiah Branches: !!!devel (F-13) only!!! InitialCC: why F-13 only? 1.) This is just the engine, just the framework. For it's own it's good for nothing. We need a client. In this case I'm planning to integrate Unknown Horzion, an Anno 1602 like game. And this will be a long long time coming.. 2.) There is no shedule for a stable-release. I'm in good contact with upstream. If they are release a stable in the F-12 stable time and UH is ready I can do it for F12 as well. But I don't think that it make sense for me to bring an embryonic software to a stable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 08:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280807.n8S878WT005291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #36 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-28 04:07:07 EDT --- Thank you Thomas & Mamoru for your reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 08:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280819.n8S8JaRc016935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #20 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-28 04:19:32 EDT --- Thanks Peter! applied and fixed the obsolete line in: http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings.spec http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280905.n8S950kt016156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |apevec at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |apevec at gmail.com Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj |fedora-review+ |ect.org), | |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #20 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 05:03:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Concur? Yes. Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint TurboGears2-2.0.3-2.fc12.* TurboGears2.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tg/test_stack/i18n/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tests.mo TurboGears2.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tg/tests/i18n/de/LC_MESSAGES/tests.mo TurboGears2.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tg/tests/i18n/ru/LC_MESSAGES/tests.mo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. => These are part of the test stack, not actual translations. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [=] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. => md5sum match, but spec URL is not yet valid: http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/T/TurboGears2/ is not found. Assuming this is going to happen soon, if not, it should be changed to the working URL from the project's site: http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/downloads/2.0.3/TurboGears2-2.0.3.tar.gz ? [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. => koji dist-f12 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1708773 [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. => see above rpmlint output, .mo files are for tests only [n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] New: Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Summary: Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://royale.zerezo.com/fapg/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/atrpms/fapg-0.41-1.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/fapg.spec FAPG means Fast Audio Playlist Generator. It is a tool to generate list of audio files (Wav, MP3, Ogg, etc) in various formats (M3U, PLS, HTML, etc). It is very useful if you have a large amount of audio files and you want to quickly and frequently build a playlist. It is coded in C to be as fast as possible, and does not use any specific audio library (like ID3Lib). This allow you to deploy it faster and easier, and to have better performances since the less informations are loaded. In the other hand, this tool is not (yet) compatible with all the known formats. -------------------------------------------------- Very simple package with a single BR: uriparser-devel rpmlint output is clean. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:51:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280951.n8S9p3dH001805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |stefan at seekline.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280950.n8S9oHpo001700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stefan at seekline.net --- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-28 05:50:15 EDT --- Review of sha256sum dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm 80fb0effdea2f5e102f41175cef31eee7ecf20cf39f637660a33a0975be02d7f [ OK ] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-ppc/result/dualscreen-mouse-utils-* dualscreen-mouse-utils.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install dualscreen-mouse-utils.src: E: no-buildroot-tag 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. The two errors can be ignored since they are not required in Fedora 10 an newer anymore. [ OK ] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [ OK ] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [ CHECK ] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . One small thing left, the Guidelines say to preserve the timestamps (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps). Just use "install -p" [ OK ] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [ OK ] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [ OK ] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [ OK ] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. sha256sum dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5.tar.gz: 51c94b382e3b32ea8ccbcb3f2ef8972acc68329aec3c4fcaeaf7f55fda166303 [ OK ] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [ OK ] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Build on all architectures. Checked via koji. [ OK ] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [ OK ] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [ OK ] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [ OK ] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [ OK ] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. rpmls dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-2.fc11.ppc.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mouse-switchscreen -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mouse-wrapscreen drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5/gpl.txt [ OK ] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [ OK ] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [ OK ] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [ OK ] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [ OK ] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [ OK ] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [ OK ] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [ OK ] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. No headers available. [ OK ] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. No libraries available. [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). No need for pkgconfig. [ OK ] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [ OK ] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [ OK ] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [ OK ] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Non GUI app in package. [ OK ] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [ OK ] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). rpmlint complains about this one too but the guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install) say that it is OK for Fedora 10 and later: "The current redhat-rpm-config package in Fedora 10 and newer automatically deletes and creates the buildroot at %install, so in Fedora 10 and newer, it is not necessary for packages to manually Prepare the BuildRoot for install as described below. Fedora releases older than 10 and EPEL releases older than or equal to 5 still need to follow the below guidelines." Therefore I marked this one as OK. [ OK ] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. --------------------------------- [ OK ] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ N/A ] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ OK ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ OK ] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Checked via koji. [ Not done ] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [ OK ] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. No scriptlets used. [ OK ] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [ OK ] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [ OK ] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. ------------------------------------------ Checked also upstream for newer versions but 0.5 is the latest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280952.n8S9q3RD026163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280956.n8S9uYCB027207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 09:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280955.n8S9tp0k027096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |apevec at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 10:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526014] New: Review Request:kprof - Profiling results viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:kprof - Profiling results viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526014 Summary: Review Request:kprof - Profiling results viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/kprof/kprof.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/kprof/kprof-1.4.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: A visual tool for developers that displays the execution profiling output generated by code profiling tools. All patches are adapted from debian sid and have been submitted upstream (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=10250&atid=310250 -> as 2868753 , 2868754 , 2868756 , 2868758 , 2868760 , 2868762 , 2868763 ) The package seems to work fine in Centos 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 11:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524437] Review Request: nss_updatedb - Maintains a local cache of network directory user and group information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281126.n8SBQQg0010659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524437 --- Comment #6 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-28 07:26:25 EDT --- Jason, Firstly, Apologies. It's an inadvertent mistake I made. I'm new to Fedora process. Still learning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 11:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281127.n8SBRjFL018972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-28 07:27:44 EDT --- > Just use "install -p" Doesn't apply here. Timestamps of the two freshly compiled programs will be new anyway. Timestamps of the %doc files are preserved already. > American English. sed -i 's!dependend!dependent!' dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 11:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281127.n8SBR3AV018894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-28 07:27:01 EDT --- ok, thank you, thank looks much better now. Of course, feel free to push upstream to do a proper release tarball (it does not look like there is much development there, it shouldn't be too hard to stick a release version label). Anyway: * package naming is correct * License tag is correct and acceptable * Sources matches upstream * builds in mock for F11 all the rest is pretty much identical to the java ant spec template at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 11:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281153.n8SBrmF9015821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-28 07:53:47 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vecmath Short Description: The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 11:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281159.n8SBxqA5025027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #3 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-28 07:59:51 EDT --- Thanks for comments. > * License statement of the spec file itself > - It is not forbidden, however ususally spec files in Fedora > packages don't contain license statements on the spec files > themselves. OK. I've removed the license statements. > * Naming/EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) > - The release number of the spec file should have integer > value except for the cases written in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Package_Release > > - And usually adding %{?dist} tag is preferred. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag OK. I've update the release number to "2%{?dist}". > * Vendor > - Vendor tag must be removed on Fedora. This tag is automatically imported > on Fedora build server. OK. I've removed the Vendor tag. > * Exclusiveos > - I don't think you have to write this explicitly. OK. I've removed the Exclusiveos tag. > * Perl related packaging treatment > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl > - "Requires: perl >= 5.8.1" does almost nothing because Fedora's perl > rpm has epoch: > > - And anyway I don't think this is needed because even Fedora 10 > (the oldest branch currently supported on Fedora) uses perl 5.10. OK. I've removed the Requires tag for perl. > - For perl module dependency, please write virtual Provides names > instead of rpm names directly: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides OK. I've updated the perl module dependencies to use virtual Provides names. > * rpmlint issue > ------------------------------------------------------ > popfile.src: W: strange-permission popfile 0775 > popfile.src: W: strange-permission start_popfile.sh 0775 > ------------------------------------------------------ > - All files in srpm should have 0644 permission. OK. I've applied appropriate permissions. > * %setup/%build/%install > - Umm... I think your current spec file is unneededly verbose > and redundant. While listing %files section verbosely can be > accepted, is there any reason you don't prefer to write like > below? (all commentes removed for now) > ------------------------------------------------------ > Thanks. I've updated the %install section. > Some notes: > - %setup recognizes zip file. "-c" option on setup creates > the diretory beforehand when unpacking source. Also "-q" option > is preferred to suppress messages when unpacking source. I want to pass "-a" option to unzip for converting line endings of the text files. So that I splitted the %setup and %{__unzip}. > - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option (or > "-a" for "cp") to keep timestamps on installed files: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Thanks for the information. I've added "-p" option. > - If you want to close macros with {}, please do so consistently > (i.e. please use %{name}) OK. I've done. > * Initscripts treatment > > Some notes: > - Some Requires(post) or so are missing I've added Requres(post), Requires(preun) and Requires(postun). > - Why your spec file stopps daemon every time this package is > upgraded (on %pre)? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax I wanted to stop the daemon before upgrading and restart it after upgrading. Now I've commented out '/sbin/service popfile stop'. > ! Also please check %postun scriptlet example (and the usage of > condrestart) I've written %postun script. > - Please use either "/sbin/service popfile" style or "%{_initrddir}/popfile" > style consistently I've updated the scripts to use "/sbin/service" style. > - Currently using %{_initddir} macro instead of %{_initrddir} is preferred: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem I've updated the spec file to use %%{_initddir} macro instead of %%{_initrddir}. > - rpmlint warns: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > popfile.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/popfile > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > OK. I've updated chkconfig line and deleted Default-Start and Default-Stop lines. > * %files > - Now %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred on Fedora. OK. I've updated %defattr. > - By the way > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > can be unified as > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > %files > %{_datadir}/%{name}/Classifier/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for the information. I've simplified the %files section. I've uploaded the new SPEC and SRPM files: Spec URL: http://getpopfile.org/browser/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec?format=raw SRPM URL: http://getpopfile.org/downloads/popfile-1.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281300.n8SD0dLT028940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 --- Comment #4 from Tom Moertel 2009-09-28 09:00:37 EDT --- Should I do anything else to the R-plyr package to make it ready for review/approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526034] New: Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526034 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlm-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a library for processing XML streams from OCaml code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526034] Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281302.n8SD2lHs004705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526034 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-28 09:02:45 EDT --- rpmlint is clean. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526034] Review Request: ocaml-xmlm - OCaml library for streaming XML input and output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281308.n8SD84Kf030360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526034 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-09-28 09:08:03 EDT --- Koji scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281332.n8SDWMnO003568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506446(FedoraMoblin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281332.n8SDWNsE003585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506446(FedoraMoblin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281335.n8SDZANj013038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Ryan McCabe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 13:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] New: Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Summary: Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmccabe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 468230 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/luci/luci.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/luci/luci-0.20.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Luci is a web-based cluster administration application based on TurboGears 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 14:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281443.n8SEhkAX021316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |apevec at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |apevec at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 14:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281448.n8SEmiNZ030417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 14:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] New: Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Summary: Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.grazioli at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/libalure.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/libalure-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: ALURE is a utility library to help manage common tasks with OpenAL applications. This includes device enumeration and initialization, file loading, and streaming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] New: Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Summary: Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hedayat at grad.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://hedayat.fedorapeople.org/reviews/sil-scheherazade-fonts/sil-scheherazade-fonts-1.001-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Scheherazade, named after the heroine of the classic Arabian Nights tale, is designed in a similar style to traditional typefaces such as Monotype Naskh, extended to cover the full Unicode Arabic repertoire. It is an extended Arabic script font designed by SIL International for modern Unicode-based systems using OpenType for complex-script rendering. It supports virtually all of the Unicode 4.1 Arabic character repertoire (excluding the Arabic Presentation Forms blocks, which are not recommended for normal use), and is currently available in Regular weight only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281518.n8SFIMor028340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 --- Comment #1 from Hedayat Vatankhah 2009-09-28 11:18:21 EDT --- As stated in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Scheherazade_fonts, aliasing of Monotype Naskh should be added (the current package doesn't provide any fontconfig rules). What else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281525.n8SFPkrV030297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #15 from Eric Sandeen 2009-09-28 11:25:42 EDT --- Jarod, ping? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281535.n8SFZXWt008424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #11 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-09-28 11:35:31 EDT --- A little bit of googling has shown me the way to Qt translation enlightenment, so the German translation (and any other translations that are added in the future) is now built and installed. This works just dandy with the new package: LC_ALL=de_DE qbrew New spec file is uploaded and new SRPM is at http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281542.n8SFgq1V010409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 11:42:51 EDT --- luci.src: E: no-description-tag Please add some text to %description and repost spec/SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 15:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281555.n8SFt6fc013262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #2 from Ryan McCabe 2009-09-28 11:55:05 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm at the same URLs as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 16:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281627.n8SGRFve012073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 12:27:14 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint luci-0.20.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint luci-0.20.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. a67aa193e2b15a9106190f84aeb99b92 luci-0.20.0.tar.bz2 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 16:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281629.n8SGTEaF020569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-28 12:29:11 EDT --- Almost okay. * Documents directory - Usually documents (like "license" text) should be installed under %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}. If this package really wants document files to be unstalled under %{_datadir}/%{name}, it can be accepted. Otherwise please consider to move them to the directory used on Fedora by default. ! Note ------------------------------------------------------------- %files %doc license ------------------------------------------------------------- will do this automatically. * Empty scriptlets - Please remove %pre stage completely. Currently %pre stage essentially does nothing, however leaving this calls unneeded shell process (however Fedora suggests to leave %build stage even if this is empty) * logrotate file - rpmlint says: ------------------------------------------------------------- popfile.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/popfile ------------------------------------------------------------- Please consider to create logrotate file (not a blocker). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 16:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281630.n8SGU8C2012749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-28 12:30:07 EDT --- Now: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 16:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281642.n8SGg99Y015367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 16:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281659.n8SGxD0Z018782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Ryan McCabe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281708.n8SH8CKP028235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #4 from Ryan McCabe 2009-09-28 13:08:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: luci Short Description: Web-based cluster administration application Owners: rmccabe cfeist jpokorny Branches: rawhide InitialCC: rmccabe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281709.n8SH9dqv028437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Luke Macken 2009-09-28 13:09:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: TurboGears2 Short Description: Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons Owners: lmacken toshio Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281711.n8SHBOoD029286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #5 from Ryan McCabe 2009-09-28 13:11:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: luci Short Description: Web-based cluster administration application Owners: rmccabe cfeist jpokorny Branches: F-11 InitialCC: rmccabe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281715.n8SHF1ca022185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #22 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-28 13:14:58 EDT --- 1.6.3 is relased, could you please package it, if you are still interested on this package, otherwise, i'm interested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281716.n8SHGoWU030436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2009-09-28 13:16:48 EDT --- Thanks, package seems fine now. I have sent an email upstream about the license. You can import the package with GPLv2+ for now, package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281730.n8SHUGxT000322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 13:30:14 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. python-catwalk.noarch: W: no-documentation => upstream tarball doesn't include documentation either python-catwalk.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/catwalk/tg2/test/lib/base.py python-catwalk.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/catwalk/tg2/test/lib/helpers.py => these are present in the upstream source tarball 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. These errors and warning are not blockers. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. e301fad3aa9c0888f9ff03b9f556bf46 Catwalk-2.0.2.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [n/a] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [n/a] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281758.n8SHwEXA030447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-28 13:58:12 EDT --- You should give me time to review the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 17:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281759.n8SHxoq3006645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-28 13:59:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525759] Review Request: qtcurve-kde4 - A set of widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 based apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281807.n8SI7DdK008527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525759 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |QtCurve-KDE4 - A set of |qtcurve-kde4 - A set of |widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 |widget styles for Qt4/KDE4 |based apps |based apps --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-28 14:07:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-kde4.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-kde4-0.68.1-2.fc10.src.rpm [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint qtcurve-kde4.spec ../SRPMS/qtcurve-kde4-0.68.1-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/qtcurve-kde4-0.68.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/qtcurve-kde4-debuginfo-0.68.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1713885 Changed name to lowercase for sanity. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281815.n8SIF7r8010715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2009-09-28 14:15:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-catwalk Short Description: A way to view your models using TurboGears Owners: lmacken toshio Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281819.n8SIJ810011349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #20 from Steve Milner 2009-09-28 14:19:06 EDT --- After speaking with the developers on the list it sounds like they don't recommend modifying ncrack-services as it is more of a data file ... >From Fyodor: """ I suppose people could modify it, but that is not recommmended. If they want to use a custom services file, it is usually better for them to put it in ~/.ncrack or specify the location with the --datadir command-line option or the NCRACKDIR environmental variable. """ You can read the full thread at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2009/q3/1059.html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281823.n8SIN5As004228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.01-6.fc10 |1.4.01-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281823.n8SIN0o4012319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 14:22:57 EDT --- vmpsd-1.4.01-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526100] New: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526100 Summary: Review Request: django-registration - A user-registration application for Django Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/python/django-registration-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a fairly simple user-registration application for Django_, designed to make allowing user signups as painless as possible. It requires a functional installation of Django 1.0 or newer, but has no other dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 18:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281858.n8SIwMWV013078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #21 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-28 14:58:21 EDT --- Yep. If people are meant to override those defaults by specifying their own versions in a ~/.ncrack/ file then /usr/share is fine. I don't know anything about the specifics of ncrack, though -- is it meant to be run by a user or setup to be run periodically by the system administrator? If it's run ad hoc by a user then configuration in a ~/.ncrack file is fine. If it's run on a schedule then it's very nice for system administrators to know that the configuration of services is all in /etc. Note that many programs which are used as both services and invoked ad hoc (or even ones that are purely ad hoc, for instance, mutt) do store files like this in /etc for the system admin to configure while leaving the user to edit dot files in their home directories when they want to customize their ad hoc usage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281903.n8SJ3Q5G022336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-28 15:03:24 EDT --- OK, baring a broken dep in the gedatest repo, I think this latest update addresses all the blocker-worthy items I could find. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281912.n8SJC7Lo016371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-28 15:12:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geda-gaf Short Description: Design Automation toolkit for electronic design Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281914.n8SJEEVl016819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |apevec at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |apevec at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 15:14:13 EDT --- For the review I'll take latest http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-devtools-2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281919.n8SJJk5E025857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 15:19:44 EDT --- Correct URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.16.0-3.fc11.src.rpm FIX rpmlint $ rpmlint ./x86_64/gnustep-gui*0.16.0-3* gnustep-gui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gnustep-gui-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgnustep-gui.so.0.16.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 this is unusual, but probably ok 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [michel at erdos RPMS]$ rpmlint ./noarch/gnustep-gui*0.16.0-3* gnustep-gui-doc.noarch: E: postin-without-install-info /usr/share/info/AppKit.info.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ==> add another install-info line for AppKit.info OK source matches upstream $ sha1sum SRPMS/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz SOURCES/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz cc0a14f700a3736b8e4113d3ad80ed6f979d60be SRPMS/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz cc0a14f700a3736b8e4113d3ad80ed6f979d60be SOURCES/gnustep-gui-0.16.0.tar.gz FIX build ought to be verbose (I missed this for gnustep-base too, the same fix applies) add the flag 'messages=yes' to the invocation of make Several trivial fixes: - summary and description (base and doc) should say GUI not gui ==> copy newer description from README; this is fixed upstream - library and devel subpackages: "Package" should not be capitalized - library and devel subpackages have very short descriptions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281929.n8SJTtJj028634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-28 15:29:53 EDT --- add a reload that does stop/start for /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions the issues can be ignored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281942.n8SJgErF022976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-28 15:42:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > #004: Preserve timestamps during make install process by adding > INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" to your make install It should rather be : make INSTALL="%{_bindir}/install -p" install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Please correct it, i'll complete the review as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281943.n8SJhhYW031912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #5 from Christian Krause 2009-09-28 15:43:41 EDT --- Thanks for the detailed review. I share Michael's opinion that "install -p" is not needed for freshly compiled programs. If I haven't overseen anything, there was no other issue... I've just fixed the small spelling mistake: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281949.n8SJn7w9024434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-28 15:49:05 EDT --- Ok, I have it working here, however: when I build in mock, /usr/bin/zdaemon doesn't get created. When I build with plain rpmbuild, it does. So, I still have to figure out this, then I'll post a new spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281952.n8SJqH9l001600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #10 from David Huff 2009-09-28 15:52:16 EDT --- Ok, new srpm with updated initscripts include reload..... http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282000.n8SK0uFi003557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 16:00:56 EDT --- lua-json-1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-json-1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:58:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281958.n8SJwUK9002952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Christian Krause 2009-09-28 15:58:27 EDT --- New package looks good. All reported issues were fixed. Only two minor hints: - please send Patch0 upstream - please add for Patch0: and Patch1: a comment regarding the upstream status -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 19:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909281956.n8SJuVTx002678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 15:56:29 EDT --- Hello -- welcome to the world of Fedora packagers! Some preliminary suggestions -- full review to follow, after which I can sponsor you. If you could also provide links to reviews you have done, or other packaging work (preferably RPM-based), even if these are not part of any distribution, please do so. - for the Source0: field, you want to include the full URL. e.g. http://django-reversion.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - URL at the end of %description is redundant; rpm -qi will show it - %setup -q is enough; it defaults to -n %{name}-%{version} - include release number in the Changelog. If you use Emacs, the easiest way to generate a changelog entry is to use M-x rpm-add-changelog-entry (you can tab-complete after rpm-add) Use rpmlint on the source and binary RPMs after each update to make sure there are no issues -- and let me know if there is anything unclear. e.g. using your spec, I get this: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/django-reversion-1.1.2-1.fc12.noarch.rpm django-reversion.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.2 ['1.1.2-1.fc12', '1.1.2-1'] ==> missing revision number (you can skip the %{?dist} part) django-reversion.noarch: W: no-documentation ==> %files should have a %doc section. In this case, it appears the author did not provide any documentation at all, so you'd want to ask him to bundle a license file with a tarball. For now, you can package the PKG-INFO file, since it comes from upstream and at least mentions the BSD license (though it also says LICENSE UNKNOWN). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282000.n8SK0p1Q027341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 16:00:50 EDT --- lua-json-1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-json-1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282007.n8SK7stq028565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-28 16:07:53 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2+) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282006.n8SK6iKw004944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-28 16:06:42 EDT --- The build fails with tcl-devel installed. I had to remove tcl-devel so build snacc successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282014.n8SKER7x006376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2009-09-28 16:14:26 EDT --- I wasn't 100% sure if the timestamps are important for compiled binaries. Therefore, I interpreted the Guidelines very strictly. I had a similar conversation on IRC and the outcome was that the timestamps are quite important for noarch packages. But that's not the case here so I agree with both of you. Thanks for clarification ;-) $ rpmdiff dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm S.5..... SUMMARY S.5.......T dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec $ diff -u a/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec b/dualscreen-mouse-utils.spec ... -Summary: Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens +Summary: Utilities for use with dual head setups using independent screens ... -Release: 2%{?dist} +Release: 3%{?dist} ... +* Mon Sep 28 2009 Christian Krause - 0.5-3 +- Fix spelling mistake + Looks good to me. Package dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm with sha256sum e16a46cf4e50cdca72ea1fc03a4d138ac341ec9e6ad478fb55b086586557fca1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526115] New: Review Request: qtcurve-gtk2 - A set of widget styles for Gtk2 based apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve-gtk2 - A set of widget styles for Gtk2 based apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526115 Summary: Review Request: qtcurve-gtk2 - A set of widget styles for Gtk2 based apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-gtk2.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/qtcurve-gtk2-0.68.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: QtCurve is a desktop theme for the GTK+ and Qt widget toolkits, allowing users to achieve a uniform look between three widget toolkits.: [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint qtcurve-gtk2.spec ../SRPMS/qtcurve-gtk2-0.68.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/qtcurve-gtk2-0.68.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/qtcurve-gtk2-debuginfo-0.68.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1714499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282015.n8SKF8gd030291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282022.n8SKMUr7008368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Mozilla Foundation 315288 --- Comment #15 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 16:22:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > However, Oolite depends on SpiderMonkey being built with the > JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8 feature macro enabled, while Firefox currently depends on > it not being enabled. (There?s a runtime check in Oolite for this.) Switching > to JS_C_STRINGS_ARE_UTF8 is a to-do for Mozilla 2.0, as attempting to do it for > 1.9 broke stuff. (Specifically, bits of Mozilla incorrectly use strings as a > binary blob, and fixing this requires API changes.) This is Mozilla bug 315288, > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315288 > Jens, thanks for the official comment! I've linked to the Mozilla tracker. I agree with Manuel -- we'd need the packaging committee's approval to get an exemption for this. What would be really helpful is if we get official word from Oolite (you, basically) clarifying how libjs is used, and thus what the security risk in using a local copy (that is not patched automatically) would be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282024.n8SKOU1i032361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Christian Krause 2009-09-28 16:24:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dualscreen-mouse-utils Short Description: Utilities for use with dual head setups using independent screens Owners: chkr Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282026.n8SKQlBX009399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282026.n8SKQXum009336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 16:26:28 EDT --- Thanks, Peter! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pure Short Description: The Pure programming language Owners: salimma Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518574] Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282030.n8SKUebF001973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518574 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 16:30:39 EDT --- No longer necessary; gupnp-vala and rygel are finally updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282038.n8SKcNrt003681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #13 from Christof Damian 2009-09-28 16:38:21 EDT --- update to upstream 1.2.9, no other changes Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.9-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 20:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520663] Review Request: telepathy-qt4 - Qt4 bindings for telepathy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282045.n8SKjV7p005712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520663 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-28 16:45:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > And I would not mind if Michel Salim sponsors you, after all this is not a > popularity contest. ;-) > Well, I would not want to intrude. I only stepped in because the review looked to not be assigned to anyone, so if you want to be the official reviewer/sponsor, be my guest :) ? rpmlint OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines FIX license field accurate should be LGPLv2+ OK license file not deleted ? spec in US English FIX spec legible Patch0 should not use %{version}, but hardcode the version number instead. Sometimes patches continue to apply unchanged for several versions, and thus you don't want to have to keep updating the patch filename. regarding configure.ac: why modify both configure.ac and configure? If you only modify the latter, you don't have to play tricks with timestamps any reason tests are not run? Why does doc require telepathy-farsight-devel to build? Oh, and the doc subpackage should be declared "BuildArch: noarch" too. OK source matches upstream $ sha1sum telepathy-qt4-0.1.10.tar.gz ../SOURCES/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10.tar.gz 15f269048f1807bb989c57f84c118b9ac9599a10 telepathy-qt4-0.1.10.tar.gz 15f269048f1807bb989c57f84c118b9ac9599a10 ../SOURCES/telepathy-qt4-0.1.10.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 21:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526122] New: Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 Summary: Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex-1.5-1.20090901.r1069.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://vim-latex.sourceforge.net/ Description: A comprehensive set of tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents without needing to ever quit Vim. Together, they provide tools starting from macros to speed up editing LaTeX documents to compiling tex files to forward searching .dvi documents. rpmlint output: vim-latex.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 21:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282105.n8SL5EIg018405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 --- Comment #16 from Jens Ayton 2009-09-28 17:05:12 EDT --- Libjs is used to run local user-installed scripts (as parts of expansion packs) only. There is, by design, no support for loading scripts (or other expansion pack data) over the network. In debug and testing builds ? that is, ones built without the OO_EXCLUDE_DEBUG_SUPPORT macro predefined ? one designated script is able to communicate with an external program over the network using a host-defined protocol. (This is used to implement a debug console facility; it is usually only used with localhost, but this can be overridden in a configuration file, which can be part of an expansion pack together with the console script.) In principle, an expansion pack could be made which masquerades as the debug facility and uses JavaScript to send information to an arbitrary server implementing the protocol. Since we only produce ?test? versions at the moment, the standard makefile has no option to define OO_EXCLUDE_DEBUG_SUPPORT. The use of this debug facility also enables scripts to call a semi-arbitrary set of Objective-C methods on classes which are bridged to JavaScript. (Specifically, methods which take zero or one parameter, which must be an object, and return void or an object.) I am not aware of any way in which this could be used to do anything more nefarious than cause the game to access invalid memory and crash, but since it?s an open-ended set of methods I can?t rule anything out. It should also be noted that in versions of Oolite prior to test release 1.73, a similarly open set of methods could be called by the ?legacy scripting system? (which essentially consists of lists of methods to call under various circumstances). This is true of every version of Oolite prior to 1.73 on all platforms. Version 1.73 added method whitelists to address this problem. To my knowledge, nobody has successfully attacked this mechanism, but it was obviously insecure in principle. It is quite likely that there are still bugs in Oolite?s use of libjs. In the past, such bugs have manifested as immediate crashes as a result of heap corruption or assertion failures. These are broadly the sort of bugs you would expect in C programs that handle diverse and complex user data - inherently a risk, unlikely to be an attractive target. In short, I judge that the risk in building your own copy of the game is small. However, while this is not what Oolite fans want to hear, it would be a reasonable precaution to hold on including it in a distribution until we catch up with the current version of libjs (hopefully this autumn) or wait until the we?ll-get-there-eventually next ?full? release (optimistically, this winter), and then build with OO_EXCLUDE_DEBUG_SUPPORT defined by default. Due to the questionable design of the legacy scripting mechanism, I can?t recommend the previous ?stable? version (1.65) either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 21:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282108.n8SL8ue5012556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) | --- Comment #23 from Byron Clark 2009-09-28 17:08:55 EDT --- Sorry, I'm swamped. Thomas: do you want to take this one back? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 21:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282107.n8SL7SLA018756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-28 17:07:27 EDT --- You need Requires: vim-common for dir ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282235.n8SMZPxe014219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #13 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-09-28 18:35:22 EDT --- Sorry for long reply time - was on vacation and forgot about this after... (In reply to comment #12) > - Should it be renamed to qcheckers? Upstream seems to have renamed from > kcheckers. It can still Provides: kcheckers for compatability. Don't think so. Qcheckers has never had a release and likely will never have. > - Please use BuildRequires: qt4-devel. EPEL/RHEL still has qt3 and when Qt5 is > introduced, will not require changes here (Since then qt-devel will be Qt5 as > well as qt5-devel). Yeah, may be your're right. Changed. Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/kcheckers-0.8.1-4.local12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282242.n8SMgo9i011062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #1 from Andrew McNabb 2009-09-28 18:42:50 EDT --- By the way, this is my first Fedora package, so I would greatly appreciate help from a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282243.n8SMhMdO011141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Andrew McNabb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] New: Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Summary: Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amcnabb at mcnabbs.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python3.spec SRPM URL: http://aml.cs.byu.edu/~amcnabb/python3-3.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Python 3.x (backwards incompatible with the 2.x series) Python 3.x is somewhat controversial in the Fedora community. Since so many of the system tools are written in Python, it may be a very long time before Fedora can be migrated from Python 2.x to Python 3.x. Unlike previous updates to Python, it will be impossible to switch over to a new version in one day. I believe it will be important to have a Python 3.x RPM available. Note that I do NOT propose creating any separate library RPMs for Python 3. There are several reasons for creating an early RPM for Python 3.x without creating new RPMs for all of the various Python packages. First, Fedora developers will eventually need to experiment with Python 3.x, and having an RPM available would help with this. Second, people learning Python are now finding resources that are specific to Python 3.x (for example, the famous book "Dive Into Python" is now available for Python 3.x). Third, Python developers (like myself) may wish to use Python 3.x for simple scripts that don't rely on third-party libraries (there are plenty of batteries included in the standard library). This new Python 3.x RPM is loosely based on the current Python 2.x RPMs. I'm sure it still isn't perfect, but I'm at the point where I would appreciate feedback. I really think that this RPM will be helpful for many people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282247.n8SMltbc012058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-28 18:47:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: etckeeper Short Description: Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs Owners: bernie Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282248.n8SMm4hG017767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(mathstuf at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Ben Boeckel 2009-09-28 18:48:01 EDT --- I actually just looked at this about 10 minutes before your post ;) . Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282252.n8SMqQp5013166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Erick Calder 2009-09-28 18:52:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: afraid-dyndns Short Description: A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org Owners: e at arix.com Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: jan.klepek at hp.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525909] Review Request: sysprof - A system-wide Linux profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282253.n8SMr9gN019092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525909 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 22:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282255.n8SMtdQa019849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-28 18:55:37 EDT --- Thanks! Peter, would comaintain this with me? (I'll probably need a hand from you anyway...) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpointing-device-settings Short Description: Configuration tool for pointing devices Owners: giallu Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 23:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282306.n8SN6MpL022291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 23:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282325.n8SNPgx5027045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #3 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 19:25:41 EDT --- FYI, here is the status of dependencies in F-11: - python-repoze-what-plugins-sql (submitted for stable) - python-repoze-what-quickstart (blocks on above being in stable) - python-tgext-admin (submitted for stable) - python-tgext-crud (submitted for stable) - TurboGears2 (CVS requested) - python-catwalk (CVS requested) %check should be uncommented, versions specified in test_requirements are missing: - python-repoze-tm2 >= 1.0a4 - python-zope-sqlalchemy >= 0.4 - python-toscawidgets >= 0.9.7.1 - python-sprox >= 0.6.4 (this version is not even in rawhide/F12) On F11 build fails with python-migrate0.5 missing error while there's python-migrate >= 0.5 on F11 and higher. Fix is to include it conditionally. Some files have execute bit set, producing rpmlint errors: python-tg-devtools.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/devtools/templates/turbogears/ez_setup/__init__.py python python-tg-devtools.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/devtools/templates/turbogears/ez_setup/README.txt Fix is to use explicit %defattr(0644,root,root,0755). Patch for the .spec follows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 23:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282330.n8SNUG7m028323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 19:30:16 EDT --- > %check should be uncommented I mean: commented out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 23:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282330.n8SNUWkt028407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-09-28 19:30:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I actually just looked at this about 10 minutes before your post ;) . Looks > good. > > APPROVED Thanks for review :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kchechers Short Description: Checkers board game Owners: atorkhov Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 23:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909282348.n8SNmjjo027932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #23 from Peter Hutterer 2009-09-28 19:48:43 EDT --- sure, works for me, I'll probably end up doing some bug fixes anyway :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 00:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290014.n8T0EZkI008569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #5 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 20:14:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=362950) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=362950) Proposed patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 00:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290018.n8T0IT9k010193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 20:18:28 EDT --- With the proposed patch rpmlint output is: python-tg-devtools.noarch: W: no-documentation => ok: upstream tarball doesn't include documentation either -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 00:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290034.n8T0Ys64008486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-28 20:34:53 EDT --- Assuming proposed patch is applied, here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. python-tg-devtools.noarch: W: no-documentation => ok: upstream tarball doesn't include documentation either [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [n/a] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 0aa191ec9f98158f977a82ca841f93af tg.devtools-2.0.2.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [n/a] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [=] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires test_requirements are not listed in BuildRequires, avoided by removing %check section [n/a] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [n/a] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [n/a] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [n/a] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [n/a] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [n/a] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [n/a] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [n/a] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [n/a] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 00:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290041.n8T0f5Va010943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |apevec at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |apevec at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 00:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290049.n8T0nAGI019060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-migrate0.5 - chema |python-migrate0.5 - schema |migration tools for |migration tools for |SQLAlchemy |SQLAlchemy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 01:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290113.n8T1Dq1O021322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linuxdonald at linuxdonald.de --- Comment #2 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-09-28 21:13:50 EDT --- The files are not available. An reviewer can't review it ;) And i can't review it because it's to big for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 03:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290355.n8T3tFST018671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #13 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-28 23:55:13 EDT --- Done. Spec URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/avra/avra.spec SRPM URL: http://musolinoa.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/avra/avra-1.2.3-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 04:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290408.n8T48KVQ022530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-29 00:08:19 EDT --- We were requiring vim-perl-support (which in turn requires vim-common), but on second thought that seemed a bit.... heavy. I've replace the vim-perl-support req with vim-common. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/vim-perl-tt2-0.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1714911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 04:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 00:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491984] Review Request: emacs-twit - library for interfacing with twitter.com from Emacs. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290429.n8T4Tnd3021570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491984 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-29 00:29:48 EDT --- ping Dan, It has been long time since any update. This ticket will be closed in case you don't fix the URL and want to proceed with review ?? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290618.n8T6I5Kd011038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-09-29 02:18:04 EDT --- Some work has already been done http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/python3000/ Might want to compare. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226505] Merge Review: ttcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290639.n8T6dmBU021963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226505 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-09-29 02:39:47 EDT --- This package has a new maintainer for some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290640.n8T6e4Kj015010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-29 02:40:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Curses Owners: stevetraylen New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 I emailed Garrick requesting that this package also be built for EPEL to which he responded: How would you feel about taking it over as the maintainer? HPCC/Linux Systems Admin Garrick I am happy to become the owner of this package and then also create the EL-4, EL-5 branch. I think such a CVS request is also the way to change package ownership. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290643.n8T6h6Ew022694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-29 02:43:05 EDT --- Updated. SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.src.rpm I addressed comment #1 and #2, but "%files section should be much cleaner". Not should what you exactly mean Dennis. Seem sane to me. rpmlint is silent: [msuchy at dri/~/rhn/spacewalk.pub/client/rhel/yum-rhn-plugin]$ rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [msuchy at dri/~/rhn/spacewalk.pub/client/rhel/yum-rhn-plugin]$ rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1/noarch/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.3-1.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290649.n8T6nnKa016638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #24 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-09-29 02:49:47 EDT --- Ok. I hope this does not add confusion to the CVS admins ;) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpointing-device-settings Short Description: Configuration tool for pointing devices Owners: giallu whot Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290657.n8T6v9uA018508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-29 02:57:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-extlib.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-extlib-0.9.13-2.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Sep 28 2009 Matthew Kent - 0.9.13-2 - Only provided as a gem, dropping non gem support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 06:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290657.n8T6vUDJ018548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-29 02:57:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Would you tell us why you want to add non-gem support (i.e. > create_symlink and so on part) for this package? Scratch my previous comment, I think it makes sense for this package because it also ships as a .tgz (http://codeforpeople.com/lib/ruby/systemu/systemu-1.2.0.tgz) with it's own installer. On that logic I removed non-gem support from my rubygem-extlib submission (#525989). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290706.n8T76DdQ020754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkent at magoazul.com --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-29 03:06:11 EDT --- Hi, I'm working on ruby packages that could benefit from this, willing to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] New: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-config.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-config-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A class based config mixin, similar to the one found in Chef. Looking for review and a sponsor for this or one of my earlier package submissions in #525988 or #525989. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290706.n8T76JX6027338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkent at magoazul.com --- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-29 03:06:18 EDT --- Hi, I'm working on ruby packages that could benefit from this, willing to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526181] New: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-log - Ruby mixin for log functionality Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-log - Ruby mixin for log functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526181 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-log - Ruby mixin for log functionality Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-log.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-log-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A gem that provides a simple mixin for log functionality. Looking for review and a sponsor for this or one of my earlier package submissions in #525988 or #525989. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] New: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mixlib-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mixlib-cli-1.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A simple mixin for CLI interfaces, including option parsing. Looking for review and a sponsor for this or one of my earlier package submissions in #525988 or #525989. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290739.n8T7df21026570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #9 from Stjepan Gros 2009-09-29 03:39:40 EDT --- The problem is that gmixvm is scanning home directory (or /usr/bin directory, depending where it is started) but I was unable to find why it behaves that way. Anyway, I just sent an email to the gnu-mdk mailing list, but it seems that this list is dead for almost three years and also bug reports on sourceforge are equivalently old. We'll see if there will be any answer. In the mean time I'll try to find what's really happening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290742.n8T7g4oG027252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-29 03:42:02 EDT --- Some more comments - gscribble seems to be a GUI application, please take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files - AUTHORS and ChangeLog are missing in the %doc section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290744.n8T7iwOL001963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ashay.humane at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #31 from Fabian Affolter 2009-09-29 03:44:55 EDT --- Ashay, did you make some informal reviews or other packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 07:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290755.n8T7tdXN004461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-29 03:55:38 EDT --- Some notes: * License - Add this file (with writting full URL in the spec file) http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt and include this as %doc. - When saying "license same as Ruby's", on Fedora license tag should be "GPLv2 or Ruby". * %define -> %global - Now Fedora prefers to use %define instead of %global https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 08:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290811.n8T8BOnt000941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 --- Comment #16 from Adel Gadllah 2009-09-29 04:11:21 EDT --- Update from my side, as I no longer have my ath9k card I cannot test if stuff actually work (my other cards are intel which do not support AP mode yet), so if someone else want to work on this package feel free to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 08:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290830.n8T8UOI3005459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-29 04:30:23 EDT --- "%files section should be much cleaner" like: %{_mandir}/man*/* %{_datadir}/yum-plugins/* %{_datadir}/rhn/*/* I'm not sure if there's a new version out. If not, you're supposed to bump the release, not the version. Well if you're the developer, i guess it's up to you then. I can only guess since there's no README, AUTHORS, COPYING in the source tarball. Would be nice if you do a koji --scratch run and post the Task-info link in here. koji build --scratch dist-f12 path/to/srpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 08:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290833.n8T8Xegb013016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-29 04:33:39 EDT --- Erm.. Sorry, the scratch build is already there. /me seems to need glasses. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 08:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290844.n8T8ibmX015114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(camillegallet at yah | |oo.fr) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 08:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290851.n8T8pfmd017126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-29 04:51:39 EDT --- Updated. SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.4-1.src.rpm I bumped version (and not release), because I'm one of the Spacewalk developers and I made the change in upstream and released new version of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290908.n8T98Cmd013046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-29 05:08:11 EDT --- Let me know when you have built it for F-12, I'll add avra to the FEL Livedvd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290907.n8T97Vb6012938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-29 05:07:28 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2+) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290907.n8T97uw6020794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-29 05:07:54 EDT --- > I had a similar conversation on IRC and the outcome was that the > timestamps are quite important for noarch packages. How important is "quite important"? If there is somebody who spreads rumours like that, I'd prefer a public email in a more relevant and more appropriate place. IRC conversations are quite unimportant. The current guideline on preserving timestamps (which is worded as a recommendation: "consider using") is based on two simple facts: 1) For files whose content doesn't change with rebuilds or upgrades of a package, with preserved mtime timestamps package end-users can easily recognise the age of files (which may be a hint about the age of the software, too) and also recognise old/out-of-date documentation. That's not something of importance, it can be plain helpful. 2) For files that don't change with rebuilds or upgrades of a package (in particular not in terms of a checksum change), we don't want such files to trigger a report of external system integrity checkers because of mtime changes. [During intrusion detection, for example, a changed mtime (even with an unchanged file checksum) means that someone/something has written to a file.] And we're not talking about embedded timestamps here, which are part of a file's data and influence the file's checksum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290926.n8T9QWoG016952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-29 05:26:29 EDT --- okay, I noted that before. fact is, you can't use an internal, even it is forked... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526204] New: Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Summary: Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/ucs-fixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/ucs-fixed-fonts-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This package is got separated from bitmap-fonts package as per merge review in bug 481068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290937.n8T9bBaB026722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #5 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-29 05:37:10 EDT --- Updated to 0.8.11: Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chronojump.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-11/chronojump-0.8.11-1.fc11.src.rpm If I understood right today would be the last day for get into F12. Any news about the revision? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290939.n8T9dPUp027162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-09-29 05:39:24 EDT --- wow... that was a quick review... but after quickly looking at the package i can see that the included readme references files that are non existant in the package. wouldnt it make sense to either exclude the readme or package the required files to test the turbogears application (they are existant in the tarball)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290943.n8T9htFW020239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-29 05:43:54 EDT --- Heh, took me a while to find the reason for the version bump. You make it because you include the spec file in the tarball. Interesting. The spec is anyways in the SRPM but i think you have your reason to keep a copy in the tarball. So, if it's fine to have a package without a license copy, then i cant find anything further. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290946.n8T9kWnW021045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-29 05:46:31 EDT --- - Please change %define to %global. - Macro definition %ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290955.n8T9tsAr023221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-29 05:55:53 EDT --- package imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290955.n8T9tKKZ023067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-29 05:55:18 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291000.n8TA0Zx9031680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-09-29 06:00:34 EDT --- The %description is *very* short as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290959.n8T9x4TT023564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-29 05:59:02 EDT --- One thing forgotton... - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1715248 Build fails when trying to build this srpm on ppc64 machine. Actually ruby causes segfault, so this is due to bug in ruby, not in this srpm (perhaps). However when rebuilding srpm with "BuildArch: noarch", builder machine is chosen randomly. So for example when i686 machine is chosen, for example, build succeeds. However when ppc64 machine is chosen by chance, this pacakge won't build (due to bug in ruby). So for now it is better to add "|| :" after "rake spec". ! Note If you have time to debug this ruby segfault, it is highly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291006.n8TA6CDS000509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 06:06:10 EDT --- ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291011.n8TAB6RY026263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 --- Comment #2 from Luca Botti 2009-09-29 06:11:04 EDT --- Hi Michel, thanks for suggestions. Here the new links: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-reversion-1.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-reversion.spec Updated to -2 given the fixes in SPEC file. Thanks again and regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291017.n8TAHN7j027446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 06:17:22 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525796] Review Request: winwrangler - Small desktop daemon to perform advanced window manipulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291022.n8TAMqV3028609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525796 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291023.n8TAN3i2028657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291019.n8TAJZDv027792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 --- Comment #3 from Tim Niemueller 2009-09-29 06:19:34 EDT --- Have you been sponsored, yet? If so please provide a new package with the suggested fixes and I'll do the review. Even if you are not sponsored, yet, we can make this depend on #518636 and I can approve once you're sponsored (and the package is fine...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291023.n8TANhCr028818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-29 06:23:41 EDT --- A few more comments: - %description should end with a dot - use %global instead of %define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - license is completely unclear: Is this GPLv2 or GPLv2+? How about a COPYING file or license headers in the files? - any reason not to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) as we usually do? Not that it really matters... - timestamps don't match: Source0 in the srpm is 28. Sep 15:27, while the one from the url is 15:33. Timestamps should match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps /me knows he is pedantic, but we must not ship this until at least the license question is answered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291026.n8TAQ8d7029727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514311] Review Request: ovirt-node-recipe - oVirt Node image recipe and tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291028.n8TASAZY030096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514311 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291027.n8TAR7C0029924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291026.n8TAQVqV029847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291026.n8TAQvCC005764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291027.n8TARe7w005854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291027.n8TARxKj005928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291033.n8TAXV6N031400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291035.n8TAZCqX007691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291035.n8TAZdsa007757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502818] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291033.n8TAXodG007184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502818 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503482] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291034.n8TAYkwJ007323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503482 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291031.n8TAVrSs006841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291034.n8TAYUfx031748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503510] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291035.n8TAZ2P2032147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503510 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502834] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291034.n8TAY55k031618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502834 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291034.n8TAYrBo031808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502843] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291034.n8TAYJHi031699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291102.n8TB2wmG005236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-29 07:02:55 EDT --- I can take it back yes. Will check/fix it tomorrow and update then here. What's with Newsbeuter? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291123.n8TBN7Ct009900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #7 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-29 07:23:06 EDT --- I appreciate your thoughtful message. > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request > (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do > a formal review) OK. I'll try to pre-review someone's review request. > When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other > person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report > so that I can check your comments or review request. I see. I'll do so. Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291119.n8TBJMY5009088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #6 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-29 07:19:20 EDT --- Thanks for another comments. > Almost okay. Thank you for reviewing. > * Documents directory > - Usually documents (like "license" text) should be installed > under %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}. OK. I've moved three document files (license and two changelogs) to the appropriate directory. > ! Note > ------------------------------------------------------------- > %files > %doc license > ------------------------------------------------------------- > will do this automatically. Thanks for the information. > * Empty scriptlets > - Please remove %pre stage completely. Currently %pre stage > essentially does nothing, however leaving this calls > unneeded shell process (however Fedora suggests to leave > %build stage even if this is empty) OK. Done. > * logrotate file > - rpmlint says: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > popfile.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/popfile > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Please consider to create logrotate file (not a blocker). POPFile has its own log rotation feature. It checks log directory per hour and removes log file which is older than three days before. The new SPEC and SRPM files: SPEC URL: http://getpopfile.org/browser/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec?format=raw SRPM URL: http://getpopfile.org/downloads/popfile-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm And here's the full changes between release 2 and 3: http://getpopfile.org/changeset/3620/trunk/linux/fedora/popfile.spec Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291125.n8TBP7jC025490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #15 from narendra_k at dell.com 2009-09-29 07:25:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > That still requires the caller allocate the string; having the API return a > newly-allocated string seems simpler to me. Andy, Matt - other ideas? The caller(the apps) allocates the memory and caller(apps) frees the memory is easier in terms of tracking and freeing the memory allocated than the library allocating the memory. Also some applications like "ip" have a scenario where an "input device" and an "output device" have to be specified in the commandline. I thought such scenarios are easier to handle with this model. Any thoughts ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291130.n8TBU3AN026768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #25 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-29 07:30:01 EDT --- Newsbeuter is blocked till this is reviewed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291132.n8TBWJgJ011891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #4 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-29 07:32:18 EDT --- Local build on F10 fails %check when both python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10.noarch and python-sqlalchemy-0.4.8-1.fc10.noarch are installed: pkg_resources.VersionConflict: (SQLAlchemy 0.4.8 (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages), Requirement.parse('sqlalchemy>=0.5')) In mock it fails with: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/sqlalchemy-migrate-0.5.3/migrate/versioning/base/const.py", line 7, in from sqlalchemy.util import OrderedDict ImportError: No module named sqlalchemy.util root.log shows that python-sqlalchemy0.5 does get installed in the mock chroot, but probably pkg_resources.require should be used instead of import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291131.n8TBVo3Y027243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Alex Musolino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Alex Musolino 2009-09-29 07:31:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: avra Short Description: ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler Owners: musolinoa Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291135.n8TBZ05i012386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-09-29 07:34:58 EDT --- Few notes about the package: - Name package just "alure". Prefixing library packages with lib is debian scheme, we try to name package closer to upstream name. This: > %setup -q -n alure-%{version} could then be changed simply to (default for -n is %{name}-%{version}: > %setup -q - About license, if they does not name LGPL version anywhere, that means any version of LGPL and license tag should contain LGPLv2+. They also do carry some GPL'ed script in docs. If it ends up in package, this adds GPL+ to tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291139.n8TBdXqr013601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-29 07:39:32 EDT --- Well, one important question to ask is whether we actually have redistribution rights for the artwork. As far as I know, upstream has redistribution rights, but that doesn't mean that they can transfer those rights to us. Unfortunately the original spec link is 404, so I can't find upstream or the source to verify. Given the history behind various online RFTG instances, with Rio Grande alternately requesting that they not happen and then allowing some, I think it's prudent to at least have someone who understands this kind of thing take a quick look over it. But I'm not a lawyer, either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 11:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 07:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291158.n8TBwLxZ000726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-29 07:58:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > ne7ssh-doc.noarch: E: devel-dependency ne7ssh-devel > > I've thought you're a guy who preaches of "flexibility". What flexibility do > you gain by making a separate noarch -doc package strictly require two -devel > packages and their dependency-chain? None. It has become less flexible. Have it in separate subpackage -examples, which solve it trouble, also do not acceptable by your. > Technically, ne7ssh-doc does not need ne7ssh-devel for anything. The examples > and a build environment are fully optional. Somebody who actually wants to > compile stuff will need to install the development group's packages first, > anyway. Technically ne7ssh-doc contain examples and Makefile which actually need ne7ssh-devel to demonstrate it. So, if I omit it dependency make will be fail. I do not want intensionally make broken dependency. I think it is a main maintainer task create correct package dependencies. So, who install any package may expect what installed package work without any manual manipulation. And there have no mater this is game, o package for developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291213.n8TCDN3M021118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 --- Comment #4 from Luca Botti 2009-09-29 08:13:22 EDT --- Here comes the spec file: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots.spec and here is the package: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots-0.6.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks and regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291212.n8TCC1VE020848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-09-29 08:12:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I'm using the same version. But you should make yourself familiar with mock. It > ensures that you have a clean build area. If you are really really unsure about > your build you can try using koji. But before that you should use mock. I did a > built for you on koji and still get the following errors/warnings: Is especially strange, because when I do not found these errors on locally built files I built it on koji and check, only after that I wrote what I do not see it... > Whenever you change something at your package then do a release bump. I have > two versions of your package (release 3): Typically I do that. This obviously is mistake, sorry. Please check last package from site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291218.n8TCI0B5004771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055 --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-29 08:17:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Few notes about the package: > - Name package just "alure". Prefixing library packages with lib is debian > scheme, we try to name package closer to upstream name. > This: > > %setup -q -n alure-%{version} > could then be changed simply to (default for -n is %{name}-%{version}: > > %setup -q > OK > - About license, if they does not name LGPL version anywhere, that means any > version of LGPL and license tag should contain LGPLv2+. > They also do carry some GPL'ed script in docs. If it ends up in package, this > adds GPL+ to tag. Right, i found this one from author: http://www.nabble.com/ALURE-1.0-Debian-packages-td23972602.html confirming it's LGPLv2+. Some files under doc are part of NaturalDocs, which is under GPLv2+. So License is LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ Thanks for looking at this, updated file here: Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225682] Merge Review: desktop-printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291227.n8TCRllI006688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225682 --- Comment #4 from Tim Waugh 2009-09-29 08:27:46 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:26:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521909] Review Request: ne7ssh - SSH Library is a Secure Shell client software written in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291226.n8TCQfuk006599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521909 --- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt 2009-09-29 08:26:38 EDT --- Splitting-hairs. You *could* include these tiny example source files in the -devel package, but it really doesn't matter. It's cleaner to treat them as documentation. * The examples don't even build from scratch. They fail. You haven't tried to compile them at all, which shows how unimportant they are to you. Most of them are missing to include the cstdio header. * The examples won't build inside their directory as only superuser root can write to that directory. A normal user would need to copy them somewhere else. * The examples don't even work if built without modifications, since some contain only examplary values instead of real-life configuration values. They are really just an add-on to the API documentation, not ready-to-run demos. * Documentation packages also need a program that can display the documentation. For example, a browser for HTML pages. Or a viewer for PDF files. Such requirements are _not_ hardcoded as package dependencies. * All -devel packages need a matching development environment, i.e. compilers and tools, standard libraries. Such requirements are _not_ hardcoded as package dependencies either. * A packaging issue is left, too. This is Fedora's cmake invocation with the %{cmake} macro: %build -CFLAGS="%{optflags}" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" cmake . +%{cmake} . make all %{?_smp_mflags} Look at "rpm --eval %cmake" to see what it does. Not only does it set the optflags, it also increases verbosity to fill the build log with relevant output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526238] New: Review Request: python-guppy - A Python Programming Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-guppy - A Python Programming Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526238 Summary: Review Request: python-guppy - A Python Programming Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-guppy.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-guppy-0.1.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Guppy-PE is a library and programming environment for Python, currently providing in particular the Heapy subsystem, which supports object and heap memory sizing, profiling and debugging. It also includes a prototypical specification language, the Guppy Specification Language (GSL), which can be used to formally specify aspects of Python programs and generate tests and documentation from a common source. rpmlint: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/python-guppy-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ Koji logs for EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1715958 Koji logs for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1715970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291234.n8TCYhOx025477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 --- Comment #6 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-09-29 08:34:42 EDT --- Fixed SRPM and SPEC files are available at http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291249.n8TCnPuG028634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-29 08:49:24 EDT --- Good point, re-adding FE-LEGAL, and I'll contact the author in the meantime for clarification on redistribution rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 12:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291258.n8TCwYQB030732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-29 08:58:32 EDT --- Now it is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 13:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291332.n8TDWl1P008343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-29 09:32:46 EDT --- Heh, yeah, i know that. My bad.. Byron, should i take Newsbeuter as well? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 13:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524896] Review Request: perl-Nagios-NSCA - Perl client for Nagios - NSCA. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291342.n8TDgBI1010895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524896 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-29 09:42:10 EDT --- I've not had any response from the author but given the contents of the files as highlighted above this is GPL+ Please can legal-block be removed? Steve http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/perl-Nagios-NSCA/perl-Nagios-NSCA.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 13:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291356.n8TDuY3s003229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-09-29 09:56:33 EDT --- hi, Updated spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/oflb-prociono-fonts.spec updated srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/oflb-prociono-fonts-20090715-2.fc12.src.rpm more info on the mock build here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/prociono/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291404.n8TE4W2j004737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #9 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-29 10:04:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > wow... that was a quick review... but after quickly looking at the package i > can see that the included readme references files that are non existant in the > package. wouldnt it make sense to either exclude the readme or package the > required files to test the turbogears application (they are existant in the > tarball)? I guess we'll need some guideline how to properly RPMize TurboGears applications. But strictly speaking this is not a blocking issue for the package review i.e. not MUST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291407.n8TE7Su7016763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291407.n8TE75kn016684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 --- Comment #12 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-29 10:07:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: snacc Short Description: Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291409.n8TE9k3g017198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-29 10:09:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > The %description is *very* short as well. Still better than empty :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291422.n8TEM7rG020527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:22:06 EDT --- ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291422.n8TEMwfZ020723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:22:57 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291423.n8TEN4RF020776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.15.0-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291423.n8TENp54020999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:23:49 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update webkitkde'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291421.n8TELjJI009606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:21:44 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-window-picker'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9965 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291422.n8TEMmvq009809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-29 10:22:46 EDT --- The licensing on this package is at issue. None of the source files give any license attribution, nor do any of the documentation files. The presence of "COPYING" is the only clue at licensing, so you should contact upstream and ask them to clarify what license they intend for this code to have. On its own, all we can assume from COPYING's presence is "GPL+". In addition, one file has something rather worrysome: [sender.c]: /* The procedure was found on the Internet - unknown license status!!! */ static inline uint16_t sender_cksum(uint16_t * addr, size_t cnt, uint16_t * pseudo, size_t pseudosz) { I'm pretty sure that procedure came from here: http://aluigi.altervista.org/papers/gsmsdisc.zip http://aluigi.org/about.htm#howuse describes Luigi's licensing, which is effectively "Copyright Only". You should confirm this with upstream and have them give proper attribution to Luigi Auriemma, along with a link to his website describing the licensing terms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291428.n8TESfJk022875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #11 from Ryan McCabe 2009-09-29 10:28:40 EDT --- The license is GPL version 2. I'll create a new package with a COPYING file so there's no confusion. I'll fix the README, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291428.n8TESkc8022938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:28:45 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291426.n8TEQFhF022273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:26:14 EDT --- trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291430.n8TEUh67012688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:30:41 EDT --- frepple-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291430.n8TEUnqm012742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291428.n8TESptC011976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291431.n8TEV7MV012901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291426.n8TEQK7M011233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.f | |c11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291429.n8TETHlN012113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:29:16 EDT --- php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-doctrine-Doctrine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291430.n8TEUJUo012615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:30:15 EDT --- bournal-1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bournal'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10023 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291430.n8TEUSPV024064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:30:27 EDT --- ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291431.n8TEVXxA024308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:31:31 EDT --- xml-writer-0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291431.n8TEV1QV024185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:30:59 EDT --- cmusphinx3-0.8-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291432.n8TEWkmg024613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc10 |0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291431.n8TEVbrc024342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291429.n8TETcFC023459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:29:37 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gstreamer-plugins-espeak'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522979] Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291432.n8TEWfmP013914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:32:40 EDT --- lua-lunit-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZPw4015234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:35:24 EDT --- frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZivR015311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.15.0-1.fc11 |1.0.15.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZGqK015195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:35:15 EDT --- bournal-1.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bournal'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10058 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523326] Review Request: gnome-applet-window-picker - Window picker applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291431.n8TEVQhk013369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523326 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:31:25 EDT --- gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-window-picker'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZ64T015139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:35:05 EDT --- python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sysv_ipc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10054 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZdOq026731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:35:38 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.15.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291437.n8TEbKPk027152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:37:19 EDT --- xml-writer-0.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291438.n8TEcUbq027524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:38:26 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291435.n8TEZVUh026684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.1-1.fc10 |0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291437.n8TEbPd4027223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-2.fc10 |0.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291438.n8TEcae3027584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-8.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291437.n8TEbL1M027192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #9 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-29 10:37:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The licensing on this package is at issue. None of the source files give any > license attribution, nor do any of the documentation files. > > The presence of "COPYING" is the only clue at licensing, so you should contact > upstream and ask them to clarify what license they intend for this code to > have. On this, I already contacted upstream and suggested to add appropriate license block in all source files - and a new tar ball(1.4.3) was released /with/ appropriate licenses. Will respin with an updated SPEC and SRPM > > On its own, all we can assume from COPYING's presence is "GPL+". > > In addition, one file has something rather worrysome: > > [sender.c]: > > /* The procedure was found on the Internet - unknown license status!!! */ > static inline uint16_t sender_cksum(uint16_t * addr, size_t cnt, uint16_t * > pseudo, size_t pseudosz) > { > > I'm pretty sure that procedure came from here: > http://aluigi.altervista.org/papers/gsmsdisc.zip > > http://aluigi.org/about.htm#howuse describes Luigi's licensing, which is > effectively "Copyright Only". > > You should confirm this with upstream and have them give proper attribution to > Luigi Auriemma, along with a link to his website describing the licensing > terms. sure, will confirm with upstream on this. thanks a lot for comments Tom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291436.n8TEaWY2016123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:36:32 EDT --- webkitkde-0.0.1-0.2.20090924svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update webkitkde'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291438.n8TEc4Xo016463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:38:03 EDT --- python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sysv_ipc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10089 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524468] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-espeak - A simple gstreamer plugin to use espeak In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291437.n8TEb6IR016262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524468 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:37:05 EDT --- gstreamer-plugins-espeak-0.3.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gstreamer-plugins-espeak'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10076 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503510] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291439.n8TEdfTX016804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503510 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(vcrhonek at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Roman Rakus 2009-09-29 10:39:39 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [rrakus at dhcp-lab-170 x86_64]$ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-sysfs-* sblim-cmpi-sysfs.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libLinux_SysfsAttributeUtil.so libLinux_SysfsAttributeUtil.so sblim-cmpi-sysfs.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libLinux_SysfsDeviceUtil.so libLinux_SysfsDeviceUtil.so sblim-cmpi-sysfs-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >ok # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >ok # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] >ok # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] >ok # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] >ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] >ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] >ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] >ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] >ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] >ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] >ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] >ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] >ok ----- Summary: install all libs to /usr/lib64/cmpi/ own dir /usr/lib64/cmpi/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291445.n8TEjqMM030038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #12 from Alan Pevec 2009-09-29 10:45:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > - %description should end with a dot Yes, that's usual, but I don't see it in guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description so I couldn't complain, it's not MUST > - use %global instead of %define > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define it's a draft suggestion, not MUST > - license is completely unclear: Is this GPLv2 or GPLv2+? How about a COPYING > file or license headers in the files? not all, but files under luci/lib/ do have clear license headers: # This program is free software; you can redistribute # it and/or modify it under the terms of version 2 of the # GNU General Public License as published by the # Free Software Foundation. Also luci/templates/footer.html is clear: Distributed under the GNU GPL v2 license. So it's exactly GPLv2 as stated in spec, there isn't "or higher" clause to allow GPLv2+ I have already suggested off-line to the packager=upstream maintainer to include LICENSE file into tarball to make it completely clear. > - any reason not to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) as we usually do? Not that it > really matters... yeah, setup.py creates correct permissions, but not blocking issue > - timestamps don't match: Source0 in the srpm is > 28. Sep 15:27, while the one from the url is 15:33. Timestamps should match, > see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps md5sum is important which is fine, guideline says "consider" > /me knows he is pedantic, but we must not ship this until at least the license > question is answered. I don't see why do you think that GPLv2 license is not clear? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526263] New: Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 Summary: Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mail at marcus-moeller.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/l7-protocols.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/l7-protocols-20090528-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: L7-filter is a packet classifier for Linux. Unlike most other classifiers, it doesn't just look at simple values such as port numbers but does regular expression matching on the application layer data to determine what protocols are being used. This package contains the protocol definitions files for use with the Linux Layer 7 Packet Classifier. These files are regular expressions that define Internet protocols, including HTTP, FTP, DNS, P2P filesharing, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] New: Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 Summary: Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mail at marcus-moeller.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-filter-userspace/l7-filter-userspace.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-filter-userspace/l7-filter-userspace-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: L7-filter is a packet classifier for Linux. Unlike most other classifiers, it doesn't just look at simple values such as port numbers but does regular expression matching on the application layer data to determine what protocols are being used. This is a version of l7-filter that works in userspace instead of the kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291459.n8TExAd2000702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291502.n8TF22vb001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291459.n8TExB33000723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |526263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291533.n8TFXPh4011045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson 2009-09-29 11:33:21 EDT --- At a quick glance: - %preun client uses an explicit list of services to stop, but %postun client uses a somewhat odd method of looking at /usr/share/ncid/ncid-* to figure out what to condrestart. I'd make %postun client use the same list as %preun client. - The %files lists still use /etc, that should be replaced with %{_sysconfdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291542.n8TFgc7Z001690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Luke Macken 2009-09-29 11:42:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tg-devtools Short Description: Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 Owners: lmacken toshio Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525346] Review Request: papi - Performance Application Programming Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291552.n8TFqLXx015322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525346 --- Comment #6 from William Cohen 2009-09-29 11:52:20 EDT --- Updated srpm to be buildable on non-x86 machines; Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/papi/papi-3.7.0-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 15:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] New: Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Summary: Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gplcver.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gplcver-2.11a-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cver is a full 1995 IEEE P1364 standard Verilog simulator. It also implements some of the 2001 P1364 standard features. All three PLI interfaces (tf_, acc_, and vpi_) are implemented as defined in the IEEE 2001 P1364 LRM. GPL Cver is an older version of Cver that is released under the GNU General Public License. Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11, EL-5 respectively at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716589 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716648 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716655 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291615.n8TGFAoU022029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #4 from Andrew McNabb 2009-09-29 12:15:08 EDT --- Thomas, I've tried downloading the files from a few different places, and everywhere has worked. What problem are you seeing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291615.n8TGFdDf022258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291625.n8TGP8Ge012004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-09-29 12:25:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #8) > > - %description should end with a dot > > Yes, that's usual, but I don't see it in guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description > so I couldn't complain, it's not MUST That's why I used the word *should*. > > - use %global instead of %define > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define > > it's a draft suggestion, not MUST I didn't say it's a MUST ether. > > - license is completely unclear: Is this GPLv2 or GPLv2+? How about a COPYING > > file or license headers in the files? > > not all, but files under luci/lib/ do have clear license headers: > # This program is free software; you can redistribute > # it and/or modify it under the terms of version 2 of the > # GNU General Public License as published by the > # Free Software Foundation. OK, I didn't see or grep those. My fault. > Also luci/templates/footer.html is clear: > Distributed under the href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/">GNU GPL v2 license. Sorry, but this does not mean a lot, because you still cannot distinguish between GPLv2 and GPLv2+ with it. There is no "or any later version" that could be linked. > So it's exactly GPLv2 as stated in spec, there isn't "or higher" clause to > allow GPLv2+ Agreed. > I have already suggested off-line to the packager=upstream maintainer to > include LICENSE file into tarball to make it completely clear. As it is a SHOULD thing in the review guidelines it should be mentioned here. off-line communication makes a review non-transparent. > > - timestamps don't match: Source0 in the srpm is > > 28. Sep 15:27, while the one from the url is 15:33. Timestamps should match, > > see > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > > md5sum is important which is fine, guideline says "consider" Again I said *should*, especially as he have a very uncommon situation here (Source in srpm newer than from URL) > I don't see why do you think that GPLv2 license is not clear? Because I didn't see those headers. Again, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291625.n8TGPRjI024611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-29 12:25:26 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291628.n8TGSSY7025073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #6 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-29 12:28:27 EDT --- Hi, This is my first pre-review so I might be wrong. And please note that this is an informal review. Since I want to become a packager, I'm pre-reviewing this package. I also think this package is useful. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. => FAIL(1 warning) $ rpmlint -i SPECS/tnef-1.4.6-2.fc11.src.rpm tnef.src: W: strange-permission tnef.sh 0444 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i586/tnef-1.4.6-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i586/tnef-debuginfo-1.4.6-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. tnef.sh should have 0644 permissions. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . => OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. => OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . => seems OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . => seems OK (GPLv2+ and UCD) # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. => OK (GPLv2+) # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. => OK (COPYING) # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. => OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. => OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. => OK b47184c4de61322750071cca7026b1cb SOURCES/tnef-1.4.6.tar.gz (from SRPM) b47184c4de61322750071cca7026b1cb tnef-1.4.6.tar.gz (from upstream) # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. => OK (i386) # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. => FAIL(build error on ppc and ppc64) koji build result(ppc): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716349 koji build result(ppc64) (a test failed): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716351 # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. => FAIL 'kde-filesystem' seems to be required to build. %{_kde4_datadir} macro is defined in /etc/rpm/macros.kde4 which is included in kde-filesystem package. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. => N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. => N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. => OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. => N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. => OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. => OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. => OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). => OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. => OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. => OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). => OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. => OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. => N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. => N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). => N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. => N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} => N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. => OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. => FAIL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop desktop-file-install usage It is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, one MUST run desktop-file-install OR desktop-file-validate in %install (and have BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils), to help ensure .desktop file safety and spec-compliance. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. => I can't judge. Because I don't know who owns '%{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/' directory. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). => OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. => OK # SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. => N/A (source package includes license text) # SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. => N/A # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. => FAIL RPM build errors: File must begin with "/": %{_kde4_datadir}/kde4/services/tnefextract.desktop # SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. => FAIL(build error on ppc and ppc64) For more information, please see above. # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. => OK(tested with some files in tests/files/datafiles) # SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. => N/A # SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. => N/A # SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. => N/A # SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. => N/A Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291633.n8TGXGP9013954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-29 12:33:15 EDT --- Restored, files to http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rftg In the meantime, here's what the README says: LEGAL The source code is my own creation and is placed under the GPL. For details, see the file COPYING. The original game of Race for the Galaxy was designed by Tom Lehmann and published by Rio Grande Games. Permission to distribute the card and goal images has been granted by Rio Grande Games. Which to my mortal non-lawyer eyes implies rights to distribute the artwork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291634.n8TGYO39026479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291634.n8TGYBQl026431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-09-29 12:34:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gplcver Short Description: An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291636.n8TGaTY2027076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-09-29 12:36:27 EDT --- Next Release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnustep-gui/gnustep-gui-0.14-4.fc11.src.rpm ------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291637.n8TGbKvm014969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #8 from Ville Skytt? 2009-09-29 12:37:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt.spec > SRPM URL: > http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/snmptt/snmptt-1.3-0.1.beta2.src.rpm I'd like to review this but the .spec is still at 1.2 and the SRPM URL gives a 404 Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 16:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291648.n8TGmnkY017153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #8 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-29 12:48:48 EDT --- I've done my first pre-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 And I've built SRPM on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716333 BTW, > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored#Sponsorship_model > If you are an upstream author of the package you are submitting, or if you > are active in the community that surrounds it, please say so. I am a member of upstream's maintenance team (called POPFile Core Team): http://getpopfile.org/docs/Glossary:POPFileCoreTeam And as for my recent activities in the upstream project, please see: (check-ins to the repository (naoki is me)) http://getpopfile.org/log/branches/b0_22_2/engine (assigned or closed tickets owned by me) http://getpopfile.org/query?status=assigned&status=closed&owner=amatubu&order=priority Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291713.n8THDp6T022197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #27 from Byron Clark 2009-09-29 13:13:49 EDT --- Thomas, newsbeuter is all yours also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291715.n8THFNjN022657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #22 from Steve Milner 2009-09-29 13:15:22 EDT --- Someone *could* set it up to run periodically. It's usage is quite similar to nmap though ... [steve at arc steve]$ rpm -qc nmap [steve at arc steve]$ rpm -ql nmap | grep service /usr/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes /usr/share/nmap/nmap-services [steve at arc steve]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291732.n8THWMx5007148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from John W. Linville 2009-09-29 13:32:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iwl1000-firmware Short Description: Firmware for Intel? PRO/Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors Owners: linville Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291744.n8THicJm028729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-29 13:44:37 EDT --- Hullo! Package looks good enough to normally pass review (though see the one recommended fix in the SHOULD section). Now I just need to see some more evidence of packaging knowledge (esp. since the initial package comes from Tim! Didn't know he does Python packages too, I thought it's only Lua). You cannot do full reviews, since you are not sponsored yet, but you can pre-review other packages -- see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/ReviewRequests for a list of unassigned reviews. Make sure you clearly state that it's a pre-review, and not assign the review to yourself (preventing an authorized reviewer from seeing it). Here's my review for this, as a reference: It's a bit more verbose than normal, I normally take out the irrelevant Not Applicable parts, but in case you review (or package) different types of software, they might come in handy. MUST OK rpmlint $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/django-reversion-1.1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/django-reversion-1.1.2-2.fc12.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines ? license field accurate upstream is unclear about this. Project page and one mention in PKG-INFO states BSD, but there is no license file and PKG-INFO also lists license as UNKNOWN NA license file not deleted not included by upstream. See SHOULD section below OK spec in US English OK spec legible OK source matches upstream $ sha1sum django-reversion-1.1.2.tar.gz ../SOURCES/django-reversion-1.1.2.tar.gz 8ff80fb027dc8f98d21f479b19ef0b450b266811 django-reversion-1.1.2.tar.gz 8ff80fb027dc8f98d21f479b19ef0b450b266811 ../SOURCES/django-reversion-1.1.2.tar.gz OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded built using Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1717143 OK build dependencies complete NA locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale NA library -> ldconfig NA relocatable: give reason OK own all directories OK no dupes in %files OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code NA large docs => -doc OK doc not runtime dependent NA headers in -devel NA static in -static NA if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig NA if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel NA devel requires versioned base package NA desktop file uses desktop-file-install OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD FIX if license text missing, ask upstream to include it perhaps post a bug at the upstream tracker and then put a comment in the spec above the %doc PKG-INFO line? that way you can package the correct license file once an fixed update comes out NA desc and summary contain translations if available well, nice to have, but I've only seen one package that does this (and the upstream author added the translation). OK package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described OK scriplets are sane NA other subpackages should require versioned base NA if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package OK require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475861] Review Request: gnustep-gui - The GNUstep gui library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291747.n8THlSwo010286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475861 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-29 13:47:27 EDT --- Changes look good. APPROVED. -back to go, and then it's time for me to polish up the Etoile spec :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 17:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291754.n8THsICx011854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-29 13:54:17 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (popfile) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291800.n8TI04d8032547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-29 14:00:03 EDT --- What about selling the artwork? What about using it in conjunction with other programs? I don't think it's proper to assume that we have those rights, yet if we don't then the artwork isn't acceptable for Fedora. All it seems that we know is that the author of the code has the rights to distribute the artwork in conjunction with his program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524707] Review Request: chronojump - A measurement, management and statistics sport testing tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291802.n8TI2j4M013934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524707 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-29 14:02:44 EDT --- Sorry about the delay. And no, you can still get it into F-12, you just have to get your package manually tagged. I'll help you through that if you want. There is one fix you need to make: in src/util.cs, GetManualDir() returns GetPrefixDir() + "share/doc/chronojump"; the latter should really be "share/doc/chronojump-doc-%{version}" you'd probably need to fix it with sed, in the %prep section, since the version number will change each time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] New: Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Summary: Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fped.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fped-0-1.r5664.fc11.src.rpm Description: fped is an editor that allows the interactive creation of footprints of electronic components. Footprint definitions are stored in a text format that resembles a programming language. The language is constrained such that anything that can be expressed in the textual definition also has a straightforward equivalent operation that can be performed through the GUI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291807.n8TI7KJw001626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-29 14:07:19 EDT --- This package supports openmoko hardware development and helps those developers get a one click platform for their hardware design. Coupled with Fedora's kicad and this package, the openmoko developers can now work with svn co https://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/gta02-core/ cd gta02-core/ make update make sch instead of this time consuming process http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/gta02-core/docs/GETTING-STARTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291810.n8TIA1Dp015367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-29 14:09:59 EDT --- scratch build : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1717189/ Simple Test : fped /usr/share/doc/fped-0/footprints/fbga.fpd Documentation firefox /usr/share/doc/fped-0/gui.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291810.n8TIAl2X015860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-29 14:10:46 EDT --- Rahul expressed his opinion that distributable, but unmodifiable content in games in fedora had precedent and was acceptable. In the meantime, I'll contact the author for clarification/specifics on the licensing terms wrt artwork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291818.n8TIIYp7003908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-29 14:18:33 EDT --- I do not disagree with Rahul's opinion; my questions do not relate to modification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291819.n8TIJvs7017324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #9 from Julian Sikorski 2009-09-29 14:19:54 EDT --- The patch you posted seems to work correctly. When it comes to other comments, I'm not sure how to get rid of the class path from manifest files. That's because afaik the .jar files are already shipped as compressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291826.n8TIQdlh018938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #10 from Julian Sikorski 2009-09-29 14:26:38 EDT --- I have a crazy idea of dropping the jemboss part altogether, given that I feel it's beyond me to fix all issues with it. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291830.n8TIUvFt020154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #23 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-29 14:30:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Someone *could* set it up to run periodically. This is the part that needs to be evaluated. While this:: > It's usage is quite similar to > nmap though ... > > [steve at arc steve]$ rpm -qc nmap > [steve at arc steve]$ rpm -ql nmap | grep service > /usr/share/nmap/nmap-service-probes > /usr/share/nmap/nmap-services > [steve at arc steve]$ means that nmap potentially needs to move those files. My position would be -- the system administrator should not have to configure things in /root/ in order to setup a service. Hhat's what /etc/ is for. However, if running this as a service is very esoteric (in most cases this is run at the command line by a user when they're evaluating the security of a network. Very rarely does a system admin want to drop it in a cron job or otherwise use it to constantly monitor the security of their network) then it's okay to leave things in /usr/share/ and have the users put the configuration to run the program in their home directories. In no case should the system administrator change files in /usr/ in order to configure the service. Does that make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291835.n8TIZkbK007594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-29 14:35:45 EDT --- OK, if it matters then, http://www.keldon.net/rftg/ says, Rio Grande Games is the publisher and holds all the copyrights for the images and card names. They have graciously given permission for me to distribute these, though they may not be used for any other purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 18:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291859.n8TIxF75012050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #24 from Steve Milner 2009-09-29 14:59:14 EDT --- Yes, it does. I think in this case it's OK as, in the few cases where an admin would want to run ncrack (or nmap) via cron they can use the command line switch to specify what config they want to use (or use the environment variable). They could place the file in /etc/ where system configs should be. In the rest of the (by far most common) cases they can use the data file, or override it with the same command line switches or environment variables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291913.n8TJDaN4015402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 --- Comment #13 from Steve Milner 2009-09-29 15:13:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-pp New Branches: EL-4 Owners: smilner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291915.n8TJFoJv029559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291914.n8TJEnhr028306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291924.n8TJOcRB017622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|526307 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526311] New: Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 Summary: Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wdierkes at rackspace.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm.spec SRPM URL: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm-1.2.6-3.3.src.rpm Description: This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. --- MMM (MySQL Multi-Master Replication Manager) is a set of flexible scripts to perform monitoring/failover and management of MySQL Master-Master replication configurations (with only one node writable at any time). The toolset also has the ability to read balance standard master/slave configurations with any number of slaves, so you can use it to move virtual IP addresses around a group of servers depending on whether they are behind in replication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291927.n8TJR1a5032329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 BJ Dierkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291937.n8TJbNgL003255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |526307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291936.n8TJaN7n022022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Steve Milner 2009-09-29 15:36:19 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-pygments New Branches: EL-4 Owners: smilner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291945.n8TJjOZ4006153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #25 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-29 15:45:23 EDT --- Excellent. I have no objection to that explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291953.n8TJrgPd008007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:53:38 EDT --- cvs done, with F-12 branch added (we are mass branched for F-12 now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291955.n8TJtAJf026701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:55:08 EDT --- cvs done (with F-12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291952.n8TJqL8a026068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:52:20 EDT --- Looks like jpokorny isn't in the packager group yet: luci: Unable to save all information for luci: jpokorny must be in one of these groups: ('cvsadmin', 'packager', 'provenpackager') to hold the approveacls acl Can you add a updated cvs request and reset the flag when ready? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291954.n8TJsSpF008240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:54:26 EDT --- cvs done (with F-12 added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524545] Review Request: snacc - Sample Neufeld ASN.1 to C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291957.n8TJvGlf027157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524545 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:57:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 19:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526274] Review Request: gplcver - An interpreted Verilog HDL simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291958.n8TJw3Ai027300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526274 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 15:58:02 EDT --- cvs done (with F-12 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292003.n8TK32qG010401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:02:59 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292005.n8TK5qTk029372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:05:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292004.n8TK479t010704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:04:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292008.n8TK8ogo030208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:08:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292009.n8TK9wct030348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:09:57 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292010.n8TKAmdf012914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:10:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292012.n8TKCoum013357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 --- Comment #26 from Steve Milner 2009-09-29 16:12:49 EDT --- e7433325e4df7a89f7509a5101af8c7ef459b166 ncrack.spec 76c3345d0e1b921d9cbcd4d9c79c4a3abe37c5ae ncrack-0.01-0.6.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/ncrack-0.01-0.6.ALPHA.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292013.n8TKD0PM013445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:12:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292013.n8TKDmOQ031609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:13:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525510] Review Request: geda-gaf - Design Automation toolkit for electronic design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292011.n8TKBe2s031141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525510 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:11:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292015.n8TKFrdh032149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:15:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524346] Review Request: avra - ATmel AVR 8-bit RISC microcontroller assembler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292016.n8TKGpjx014903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524346 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:16:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292015.n8TKF8gR014530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:15:06 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292018.n8TKIBoX032711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:18:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - "Common sense" Perl defaults In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292019.n8TKJwCO015647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:19:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292022.n8TKMArF016904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:22:08 EDT --- cvs done with F-12 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292023.n8TKNrcZ017249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:23:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292021.n8TKLMa8016584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:21:20 EDT --- Please use fedora account system names in cvs requests. File a new request and reset the flag to ? when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292022.n8TKM2I1016801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-09-29 16:22:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kcheckers New Branches: Owners: atorkhov Duh. Sorry, typo in package name: s/kchechers/kcheckers/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 331081] Review Request: python-pp - Parallel execution of python on smp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292027.n8TKR1iV018677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331081 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:27:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292024.n8TKONns017751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:24:22 EDT --- Please use fedora account system names in cvs requests. Reset the flag to ? when you have a revised request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292026.n8TKQURB018591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:26:27 EDT --- cvs done on the EL-5/EL-4 branches. For the rest, Garrick should be able to approve you at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Curses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246312] Review Request: Pygments - A syntax highlighting engine written in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292027.n8TKRVg3003359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246312 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-29 16:27:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292032.n8TKWcKI020045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292036.n8TKaODv021078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-09-29 16:36:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 20:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292039.n8TKdTvT021630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-29 16:39:27 EDT --- Ready! http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/opentracker/opentracker-0-0.2.20090915cvs.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 21:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292141.n8TLfY3X007903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 17:41:33 EDT --- kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 21:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292142.n8TLgB9d008112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 17:42:10 EDT --- kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kcheckers-0.8.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 21:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292146.n8TLkkEK026100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-09-29 17:46:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I'm not sure how to get rid of the class path from manifest files. That's > because afaik the .jar files are already shipped as compressed. Wait. You mean they are not built from source? You can't ship them like that. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries (In reply to comment #10) > I have a crazy idea of dropping the jemboss part altogether, given that I feel > it's beyond me to fix all issues with it. What do you think? That's acceptable as well. Just make sure all the issues are fixed when you decide to enable it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM08Sr030261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:00:06 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4, voms-1.9.12.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 21:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292159.n8TLxrwK029872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.5-1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM0Usc030438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc11 |3.1.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM0FRV030313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:00:14 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el4, voms-1.9.12.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM0OSt030390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc11 |3.1.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM0rpr030589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:00:52 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5, voms-1.9.12.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 21:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292159.n8TLxmK7029818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 17:59:47 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM1iop014324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:01:43 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292200.n8TM0xqg014010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:00:58 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.el5, voms-1.9.12.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM1S1n014211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:01:27 EDT --- php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292202.n8TM2SwF014640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.4-1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292202.n8TM2Nn7031401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 18:02:22 EDT --- python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM18DO030789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.el4 |3.1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM1CCR030955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.el4 |3.1.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM1X56031095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11 |0-0.3.20090910svn.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292201.n8TM1naq031201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.5-1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526349] New: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526349 Summary: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dgoodwin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito.spec SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Tito is a tool for managing tarballs, rpms, and builds for projects using git. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292210.n8TMATCH017024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-09-29 18:10:27 EDT --- CVS branch request: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526349] Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292210.n8TMAsge017074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526349 Devan Goodwin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Devan Goodwin 2009-09-29 18:10:53 EDT --- Submitted on wrong bugzilla account, closing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 22:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526351] New: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526351 Summary: Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dgoodwin at dangerouslyinc.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito.spec SRPM URL: http://dgoodwin.fedorapeople.org/tito/tito-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Tito is a tool for managing tarballs, rpms, and builds for projects using git. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 23:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524238] Review Request: libclaw - C++ Library Absolutely Wonderful In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909292317.n8TNHZDH019558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524238 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-09-29 19:17:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363061) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363061) patch fixing the lib dir issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 00:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300001.n8U01xMa000642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-09-29 20:01:58 EDT --- Ah i see now it works :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 00:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524413] Review Request: xfce4-xfswitch-plugin - User switching plugin for the Xfce4 Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300040.n8U0eM4U028136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524413 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |525563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300135.n8U1ZLIh030293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:35:20 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300135.n8U1ZTTc030350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.5-1.fc11 |0.2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300135.n8U1ZBYk030235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.17-6.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300135.n8U1Zrg2030502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:35:51 EDT --- lua-json-1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lua-json'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-10102 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300134.n8U1Yd4n029754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Bug 503590 depends on bug 503586, which changed state. Bug 503586 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:34:37 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300135.n8U1Z1Pc013301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:34:57 EDT --- nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300136.n8U1aGk5014052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:36:15 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300137.n8U1bD3L014323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.5-1.fc11 |0.9.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300134.n8U1YmxZ013197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.5-1.el5 |0.2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522980] Review Request: lua-json - JSON Parser/Constructor for Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300134.n8U1YErs013001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522980 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Bug 522980 depends on bug 522979, which changed state. Bug 522979 Summary: Review Request: lua-lunit - Unit testing framework for Lua https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522979 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:34:13 EDT --- lua-json-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lua-json'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-10099 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300136.n8U1acD4031069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:36:33 EDT --- ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300137.n8U1b6ZD031255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:37:03 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300136.n8U1aNwo030943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.5-1.el5 |0.9.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300140.n8U1eORn000414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.5.rc1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:41:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300141.n8U1fklu016866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:41:45 EDT --- python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300141.n8U1frFU016916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.4-1.el5 |0.2.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300140.n8U1e93t016131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:40:06 EDT --- python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.5.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 02:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - "Common sense" Perl defaults In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300200.n8U20dLf024242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-29 22:00:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 03:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300358.n8U3wHWh000701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #12 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-09-29 23:58:16 EDT --- Imported and built for devel, F12 and F11. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 03:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300358.n8U3wXal000803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 04:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300414.n8U4EK0g005495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #38 from Simon Wesp 2009-09-30 00:14:15 EDT --- Thank you Kevin. Built in rawhide! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 04:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523540] Review Request: opentracker - Bit Torrent Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300446.n8U4kVSb014614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523540 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-30 00:46:30 EDT --- Few notes: * Provide the exact way of how to build Source0. E.g. don't use only cvs co, but cvs co -D "2009-09-16" (from the cvs man - "use the most recent revision no later than given date") or something similar. I advice you to describe the whole process in the following way: # cvs -d:pserver:anoncvs at cvs.erdgeist.org:/home/cvsroot co -D "2009-09-15" -d opentracker-0 opentracker # tar cjf opentracker-0.tar.bz2 opentracker-0 Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 As a result, you won't need to add "-n %{name}" to %setup -q. * I'm in doubts, whether this needed at all - please explain: Provides: opentracker-static Other things looks sane for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 04:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525913] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip - Fetch compressed webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300453.n8U4rd2s016850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525913 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-30 00:53:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 05:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300508.n8U582g0020005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 01:08:01 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 05:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300508.n8U58C3b020048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 01:08:12 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 05:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300508.n8U5871M004169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 01:08:07 EDT --- dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300603.n8U63nEG031711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-30 02:03:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-systemu.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-systemu-1.2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm * Tue Sep 29 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.2.0-2 - Include a copy of the license (#525988). - Fix license (#525988). - Use global over define (#525988). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300620.n8U6KcHA018846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-09-30 02:20:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-extlib.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-extlib-0.9.13-3.fc12.src.rpm * Tue Sep 29 2009 Matthew Kent - 0.9.13-3 - Account for possible %check segfault on ppc64 due to possible ruby bug (#525989). - Remove unsed ruby_sitelib macro and use global over define (#525989). I'm afraid I don't have time for debugging that particular segfault at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524386] Review Request: Intrace - Traceroute-like application for network reconnaisance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300622.n8U6MK6t003459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524386 --- Comment #10 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-09-30 02:22:19 EDT --- The author has re-written the piece of code in question in sender.c(with appropriate attribution) re-written sender.c from upstream: http://code.google.com/p/intrace/source/diff?spec=svn20&r=20&format=side&path=/trunk/sender.c Rebuilt SPEC and SRPM with tar ball 1.4.3 http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace.spec http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/intrace-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm RPMlint was silent on SPEC and RPMS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [build at f12-alpha SPECS]$ rpmlint intrace.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/intrace-1.4.3-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/intrace-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300643.n8U6h8dc008182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300642.n8U6gQEH023036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Erick Calder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300644.n8U6iIOA023185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #16 from Erick Calder 2009-09-30 02:44:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_gnutls Short Description: GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server Owners: ekkis Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 I don't know how to find Tom's FAS account, and I don't even know what the InitialCC is really for, so I've just removed that line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 06:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300642.n8U6g7Ig022988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #27 from Erick Calder 2009-09-30 02:42:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: afraid-dyndns Short Description: A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org Owners: ekkis Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 I don't know how to find out Jan's FAS account name (actually I don't really know what the InitialCC is for) so I've just removed him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 07:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300730.n8U7U5Bt020396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-30 03:30:03 EDT --- Yeah, it is "feature" of our release system. But otherwise it is really easy to work with. Inclusion of license copy is "only" SHOULD item. But if you give me big plus in flag I'll give you LICENSE file :) SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/yum-rhn-plugin/yum-rhn-plugin-0.7.5-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 07:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300732.n8U7WnqZ001639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 03:32:48 EDT --- The FAS account of Jan is hpejakle and is sponsored by lkundrak. By the way usually you don't have to add the reviewer to CC list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 07:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300735.n8U7ZMUF022201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 03:35:21 EDT --- The FAS account of Tomas is tmraz and is a sponsor. By the way usually you don't have to add the reviewer to CC list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 07:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526004] Review Request: fapg - Fast Audio Playlist Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300745.n8U7jtSN024069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526004 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-30 03:45:54 EDT --- Some quick comments: - change the license tag to GPLv2+ as the file header of fapg.c says "or (at your option) any later version" - in the %files section, replace %defattr(-, root, root) by %defattr(-,root,root,-) - replace %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz by %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* to avoid relying on a certain compression format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300804.n8U84hZP028166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #6 from Ismael Olea 2009-09-30 04:04:42 EDT --- Ok. Now builds on x86_64[1] too. The updated spec: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec SRPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1718380&name=kompozer-0.8-0.1.a4.fc11.src.rpm [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1718380&name=kompozer-0.8-0.1.a4.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] New: Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Summary: Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/OpenGL-gle/OpenGL-gle.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/OpenGL-gle/OpenGL-gle-3.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: The GLE Tubing and Extrusion Library consists of a number of "C" language subroutines for drawing tubing and extrusions. It is a very fast implementation of these shapes, outperforming all other implementations, most by orders of magnitude. It uses the OpenGL (TM) programming API to perform the actual drawing of the tubing and extrusions. Note that there is already a package in Fedora called "gle" (the "Graphics Layout Engine"). Alternate name suggestions for this package are very welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300845.n8U8jVim005122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-30 04:45:30 EDT --- I'll review it shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 08:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300859.n8U8x2Np008534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 04:58:59 EDT --- pasting review comment from bug 481068, pasting only important one --------------------------------------------------- Comment #8 From Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) 2009-09-21 17:42:02 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private Well fc-scan shows that most of the bdf files declare themselves as "Fixed", two of them think they are "Fangsong ti" and the others are not parsable by fc-scan. So you need at minimum a 1. a foo-fixed-fonts subpackage, 2. a foo-fangsong-ti-fonts subpackage, 3. and get Behdad to look at the other files and tell you if it's a bug his side or if the files need some form of fixing. Fontconfig won't be able to use them if it can't read the font name inside. The readme says they are Lucida but fontconfig does not read readmes. Also - it would be probably cleaner to package the ucs fonts in a ucs-fixed-fonts package instead of hiding their origin in a collection package - the licensing of Fangsong ti needs to be extracted from the fonts in a .txt people can actually read. Comment #13 From Pravin Satpute (psatpute at redhat.com) 2009-09-29 05:29:03 EDT (-) [reply] ------- Private sorry for bit late update fc-scan works fine on all *.pcf files i have done suggested changes updated spec and srpm are as follows http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts.spec http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts/bitmap-fonts-0.3-10.fc11.src.rpm also created a new package request for ucs-fixed-fonts bug 526204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300903.n8U93xax009584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-30 05:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Am I correct in assuming that this package is identical to libgle (which > already in Fedora)? Replying to myself: I was in error, the libgle package I have installed is one of my local packages ... Appologies :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300901.n8U91V0b021756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-30 05:01:30 EDT --- Am I correct in assuming that this package is identical to libgle (which already in Fedora)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300911.n8U9BT67024146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-09-30 05:11:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Replying to myself: I was in error, the libgle package I have installed is > one of my local packages ... Appologies :) Well, if you've already got a spec file for this, I'm glad to combine efforts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300934.n8U9Y8wb017080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 05:34:07 EDT --- I'll look at it this evening. Please make sure the font name appears in the package name (ucs-fixed-fonts, bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts, etc) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300934.n8U9Ya0n017143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-09-30 05:34:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=363160) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=363160) my libgle.spec NB1: My spec file isn't 100% clean either, because I so far have not intented to submit it to fedora :) NB2: Many of the "multilib/install" issues you seem to have with your spec-file originates from you not using %configure and make DESTDIR=... install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 09:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300953.n8U9rsx5022123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-09-30 05:53:53 EDT --- Thanks for that -- I'm not sure how I ended up with the strange collection of sed commands I was using before. :) (This is what happens when you start with the upstream spec file and try to incrementally modify it ...) New version: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/OpenGL-gle/OpenGL-gle.spec http://mef.fedorapeople.org/packages/OpenGL-gle/OpenGL-gle-3.1.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] New: Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Summary: Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.grazioli at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui-2.3.0-2.1861svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: MyGUI is a GUI library for Ogre Rendering Engine which aims to be fast, flexible and simple in using. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301020.n8UAKYrw007889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 06:20:24 EDT --- vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc10,vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc10,vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301022.n8UAMjIp008201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 06:22:43 EDT --- vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc11,vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vecmath1.2-1.14-5.fc11,vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301024.n8UAOk62008513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Thomas Janssen 2009-09-30 06:24:45 EDT --- Approved -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301023.n8UANC9W008272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-30 06:23:09 EDT --- Uhh, the summary "Fast, simple and flexible GUI" is a *bit* too generic, change it to e.g. "Fast, simple and flexible GUI for Ogre". Why are you using the SVN release instead of the stable one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524888] Review Request: vecmath - The 3D vector math Java package, javax.vecmath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301026.n8UAQNYb009222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524888 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 06:26:22 EDT --- vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vecmath-0-2.20090922cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 10:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301041.n8UAf7XE031979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-09-30 06:41:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 Short Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Nfsv3 Providers Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301105.n8UB5qeW016436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-09-30 07:05:49 EDT --- OK, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301116.n8UBGggc006288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 07:16:40 EDT --- yep, font name appearing just instead of bitmap-fangsong-ti-fonts it is bitmap-fangsongti-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301118.n8UBIpgY006503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-30 07:18:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Uhh, the summary "Fast, simple and flexible GUI" is a *bit* too generic, change > it to e.g. "Fast, simple and flexible GUI for Ogre". > Sounds right; i swear if i also had to name the package ogre-mygui: it's not actually an addon (libs go to _libdir not _libdir/OGRE), but is of no use without it. > Why are you using the SVN release instead of the stable one? I'm targeting that specific revision (with minor changes ahead of the released 2.2.2) because its a dependency of http://dungeonhack.sourceforge.net, an ogre game i plan to package in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301118.n8UBImO6018472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute 2009-09-30 07:18:47 EDT --- also as commented by Jens in comment #11 IMO we should plan from that direction also, otherwise it looks bad two Packages providing same Set of Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301118.n8UBIvLb018535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-30 07:18:56 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 526451 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301118.n8UBIws6018560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ivazqueznet at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-30 07:18:56 EDT --- *** Bug 484511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526451] New: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526451 Summary: Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/crunchyfrog.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/crunchyfrog-0.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CrunchyFrog is a SQL client and database front-end. It's mainly written for GNOME but it should run in other environments too. Supported databases: * PostgreSQL (requires psycopg2) * MySQL (requires MySQLdb) * SQLite (requires python-sqlite3) * Oracle (requires cx_Oracle) * LDAP (requires python-ldap) * MSSQL (requires pymssql) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 11:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301145.n8UBjiij024621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-30 07:45:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-rhn-plugin Short Description: RHN support for yum Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301209.n8UC95tj016645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-30 08:09:04 EDT --- Few notes: * Since it is a svn snapshot, please add "0." to Relese. E.g. Release: 0.1.r5664%{?dist} * Please, provide exact instructions on how to build Source0. E.g. something like this: # svn export -r 5664 http://svn.openmoko.org/trunk/eda/fped fped-0 # tar cjf fped-0.tar.bz fped-0 Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 Other things looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301218.n8UCIqGm030824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 --- Comment #10 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-30 08:18:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > -------------------------------------------------------- > This package (popfile) is APPROVED by mtasaka > -------------------------------------------------------- Thanks. > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". OK. I've built my SRPM using koji: Fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1717407 Fedora 11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1717412 Fedora 12(same as above) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716333 Next, I'm going to do CVS admin request. > Now I am sponsoring you. Thank you. I'm glad to join the package maintainer! > If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). OK. I'll read the document. > If you have questions, please ask me. I appreciate you. Naoki -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301224.n8UCOHQl019772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-30 08:24:16 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fped.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fped-0-0.1.r5664.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301234.n8UCY4IQ001236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Naoki IIMURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Naoki IIMURA 2009-09-30 08:34:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: popfile Short Description: Automatic Email Classification Owners: amatubu Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525764] Package Review: rftg - Race for the Galaxy card game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301238.n8UCcdRQ002329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525764 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review- --- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter 2009-09-30 08:38:37 EDT --- It's as we feared, "I'm afraid that, as I understand my agreement with Rio Grande, only I can legally distribute the card and other images included with the game (though other people could pursue similar agreements, and have). In addition, my permission expires when/if a commercial "official" computer version of the game is released. Supposedly such a thing is in the works, though I have my doubts as to whether it will be completed. I think that distributing RFTG as a Fedora (or Debian or other distro) package is not advisable." There you have it. My bad, I should've double-checked with the author first, sorry for the time-waster folks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 12:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301246.n8UCkou7004439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-09-30 08:46:49 EDT --- Oh, another small note - since you're now using %{name}-${version}.tar.bz2 as the Source0, you don't need to add "-n %{name}" to "%setup -q". Please, remove it. Assuming, that you'll do it, here is my REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco BUILD]$ diff -ru fped fped-0/ [petro at Sulaco BUILD]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. | Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in the packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED (assuming, that you'll fix the %build section). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 13:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301300.n8UD0ltF007137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-09-30 09:00:46 EDT --- Thanks Peter. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fped Short Description: A footprint editor used by openmoko developers Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 13:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505360] Review Request: JSCookMenu - Javascript GUI-like web menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301304.n8UD4sAt007855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471231 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 13:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301304.n8UD4rEl007839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471231 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 13:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301304.n8UD4qoC007818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505354, 505360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 13:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301311.n8UDB1Bj009430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #14 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-09-30 09:10:57 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 14:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301412.n8UECXcJ011981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 --- Comment #4 from Luca Botti 2009-09-30 10:12:31 EDT --- Hi Michel, For the SHOULD part, I opened the issue with the author, which is going to add the documents for next point release, due in a couple of weeks. For the experience, i will take care of the pre-review part. For reference on other packaging, see the others packages submitted in bugzilla or go to my blog (http://www.lbotti.net/blog). Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 14:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522920] Review Request: tnef - Extract files from email attachments like winmail.dat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301427.n8UERQ04016149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522920 --- Comment #7 from David Timms 2009-09-30 10:27:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > This is my first pre-review so I might be wrong. And please note that this is > an informal review. > Since I want to become a packager, I'm pre-reviewing this package. I also > think this package is useful. Hi Naoki, thanks for your detailed and helpful pre-review. > # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > the review. > => FAIL(1 warning) > $ rpmlint -i SPECS/tnef-1.4.6-2.fc11.src.rpm > tnef.src: W: strange-permission tnef.sh 0444 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. > Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. I had tried to fix this, and found that it made no difference. I realize now that I was running rpmlint on the -1 version of my package, doh. So fixed that. > # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines . > => seems OK (GPLv2+ and UCD) Actually, without raising it, perhaps the mixed X + Y license would better describe it, I'm not really sure. > # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in > bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on > that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the > corresponding ExcludeArch line. > => FAIL(build error on ppc and ppc64) I had not tried build on non intel arches, thanks for triggering a mock build. > koji build result(ppc): > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716349 ===== mv -f .deps/mapi_types.Tpo .deps/mapi_types.Po mv -f .deps/tnef_names.Tpo .deps/tnef_names.Po mapi_names.c:1307: fatal error: error writing to -: Broken pipe compilation terminated. The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem. gcc: Internal error: Interrupt (program as) Please submit a full bug report. See for instructions. ===== No idea what is happening here. > koji build result(ppc64) (a test failed): > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1716351 ===== PASS: directory.test PASS: maxsize.test \'diff ./body.output ./body.baseline > ./body.diff\' -- Test Failed! FAIL: body.test PASS: mime-types.test cat: write error: Broken pipe PASS: stdin.test ===== again broken pipe. I tried to queue some new scratch builds, but I don't remember the proper commands to set it up. (certificate error). > # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > => FAIL > > 'kde-filesystem' seems to be required to build. > %{_kde4_datadir} macro is defined in /etc/rpm/macros.kde4 which is included in > kde-filesystem package. And, since the installed .desktop file wouldn't be owned without out this package, I am including it now as both Requires and BR. > # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop Hmmn, that is an unfortunate side effect. The app is not a gui app, and it doesn't make sense for an icon to appear in the normal Application (or other) menu, because the app needs an input tnef file to extract to be useful. It does make sense to have the right click (open with) menu in nautilus/doplhin though. It seems you get one when you want the other, unless there is another way to achieve this file mime-type association ? I have asked on fedora-packaging list about this item. Perhaps I'm doing something that isn't allowed for other reasons ? > # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package > owns, then please present that at package review time. > => I can't judge. > > Because I don't know who owns '%{_datadir}/mimelnk/application/' directory. rpm -qf /usr/share/mimelnk/application/ kde-filesystem-4-25.fc11.noarch , but I think other non kde items (eg gnome desktop uses that folder) live there as well. > # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > => FAIL > > RPM build errors: > File must begin with "/": > %{_kde4_datadir}/kde4/services/tnefextract.desktop As you mention above, that is probably because the macro is not defined, so adding the build requires fixes that. > # SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all > supported > architectures. > => FAIL(build error on ppc and ppc64) > # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > => OK(tested with some files in tests/files/datafiles) Did you try the menu integration from either nautilus or dolphin ? I would appreciate your feedback on testing from both if you are able ;-) Updated package: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/tnef/tnef-1.4.6-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 14:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301447.n8UElLgs001318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Ryan McCabe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Ryan McCabe 2009-09-30 10:47:19 EDT --- Actually, it's fine to leave him off for now. I'll get his account status sorted out, then update his project status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301502.n8UF2b3L024357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 11:02:35 EDT --- krazy2-2.9-4.20090928svn.fc11.1,kdevplatform-0.9.95-0.3.beta5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krazy2-2.9-4.20090928svn.fc11.1,kdevplatform-0.9.95-0.3.beta5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301505.n8UF5xQY006879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 11:05:57 EDT --- iwl1000-firmware-128.50.3.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iwl1000-firmware-128.50.3.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301502.n8UF2gr6005886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 11:02:42 EDT --- krazy2-2.9-4.20090928svn.fc10.1,kdevplatform-0.9.95-0.3.beta5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krazy2-2.9-4.20090928svn.fc10.1,kdevplatform-0.9.95-0.3.beta5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301507.n8UF7qkD026003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |linville at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301504.n8UF4N1g024768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 --- Comment #16 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-09-30 11:04:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > wow... that was a quick review... but after quickly looking at the package i > > can see that the included readme references files that are non existant in the > > package. wouldnt it make sense to either exclude the readme or package the > > required files to test the turbogears application (they are existant in the > > tarball)? > > I guess we'll need some guideline how to properly RPMize TurboGears > applications. > But strictly speaking this is not a blocking issue for the package review i.e. > not MUST. not a must but i still prefer to use common sense and check for "relevant" issues when looking at a package (not trying to be a pain but trying to help increase the quality of the packages that enter the distro). while i know this is not a software review but a package review it still makes sense to get things sorted. if i see issues i am going to report them, even if they are not on the checklist and not rpmlint output. while still under review we are saving time and bandwidth to get things sorted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526179] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-cli - Simple ruby mixin for CLI interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301537.n8UFbrMc000676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526179 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 11:37:52 EDT --- Some notes: * Please change from %define to %global * -doc subpackage has %files entry ----------------------------------------------------- %files %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ ----------------------------------------------------- This is already included in main package and should be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301547.n8UFlVOQ017451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 11:47:29 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk-0.04-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301549.n8UFnvfq003175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Miroslav Such? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Such? 2009-09-30 11:49:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spacewalk-koan Short Description: Support package for spacewalk koan interaction Owners: msuchy Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301551.n8UFpoRO018513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 --- Comment #7 from Mike McCune 2009-09-30 11:51:50 EDT --- handing over to msuchy as maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:55:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523756] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_iwl1000-firmware_-__Firmw?= =?utf-8?q?are_for_Intel=C2=AE_PRO?= /Wireless 1000 B/G/N network adaptors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301555.n8UFtI0t019277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|linville at redhat.com |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 15:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525989] Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301551.n8UFpuAW018548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525989 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 11:51:55 EDT --- One thing: - Please use "%%" instead of "%" in %changelog so that macros won't be expanded unexpectedly. As you have some other review requests which seem good to some extent from a quick glance (ref: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored ) ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-extlib) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509310] Review Request: gpointing-device-settings - Configuration tool for pointing devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301606.n8UG6vC4007640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509310 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 12:06:53 EDT --- gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301607.n8UG7GGn007710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 12:07:15 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-systemu) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- Please see bug 525989 for further process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301609.n8UG9b3C008006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-30 12:09:36 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/emacs-jabber.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/emacs-jabber-0.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301611.n8UGBnkO008671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bowe at redhat.com) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 12:11:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301614.n8UGELCH023200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 12:14:19 EDT --- Please submit push request for F-11 on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301615.n8UGFVhm023651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(reneploetz at gmx.de | |) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 12:15:26 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301612.n8UGCvIo023021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 12:12:54 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523199] Review Request: ncrack - high-speed network authentication cracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301634.n8UGYsHe013350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523199 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-30 12:34:50 EDT --- The latest package release is identical to revision 4, so the review in comment #11 is still valid. I just had a look into the package and everything seems to be fine now. Since the default location of file ncrack-services turned out to be OK, I dare to approve the package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 16:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301646.n8UGkkvF030517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-09-30 12:46:45 EDT --- [rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint swish-e.spec swish-e.spec:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*cgi swish-e.spec:94: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/swishspider swish-e.spec:95: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*pl 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. Ignore all of them .. I cannot find any macro which specially expands to /usr/lib/ on 64bit and not to /usr/lib64/ swish-e.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libswish-e.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 I will report this to upstream, but this should not be a blocker. swish-e-perl.x86_64: W: no-documentation yeah it does not have any, so please ignore. file-not-utf8 please ignore this one as some names are in not utf-8 and changing them would make sense either. Other changes are done. Thanks for remarks. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/swish-e.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/swish-e-2.4.7-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 17:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522657] Review Request: kmymoney2-aqbanking - Online banking plugin for KMyMoney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301729.n8UHTpg0007417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522657 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 13:29:49 EDT --- kmymoney2-1.0.1-1.fc11,kmymoney2-aqbanking-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmymoney2-1.0.1-1.fc11,kmymoney2-aqbanking-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 17:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526180] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-config - Simple ruby config mixin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301745.n8UHjvmk029318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526180 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-30 13:45:56 EDT --- The latest package of rubygem-mixlib-config seems 1.0.12. Please update first. Also please check my comments on bug 526179. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 18:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301811.n8UIB0Os017517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 14:10:55 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-1.27-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 18:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301811.n8UIBaeu002311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 14:11:36 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-1.27-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 18:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301822.n8UIMKDl020338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #47 from Adam Williamson 2009-09-30 14:22:15 EDT --- ping? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 19:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] New: Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 Summary: Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/stomppy/stomppy.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/stomppy/stomppy-2.0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: ?stomp.py? is a Python client library for accessing messaging servers (such as ActiveMQ or JBoss Messaging) using the STOMP protocol. It can also be run as a standalone, command-line client for testing. $ rpmlint SPECS/stomppy.spec \ RPMS/noarch/stomppy-2.0.2-3.fc11.noarch.rpm \ SRPMS/stomppy-2.0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1720793 I'll request to the developer now for possible inclusion of a LICENSE file. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 19:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909301928.n8UJS3uC020463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211 --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-09-30 15:28:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-ditz-0.5-2.fc11.src.rpm there is added explicit permission for trollop library "Additionally, this program may be linked to, distributed with, used with, and/or loaded with the Ruby "Trollop" library." (added http://gitorious.org/ditz/mainline/blobs/raw/master/README.txt into package) Hope it fixes license issues and FE-LEGAL could be cancelled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302006.n8UK6x4K030390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Bug 503591 depends on bug 503590, which changed state. Bug 503590 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-09-30 16:06:57 EDT --- Built in rawhide, waiting on python-sprox to hit stable for EL-5, and F12 is locked so we'll need to go through releng for that branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302016.n8UKGD7v032353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Bug 501576 depends on bug 479021, which changed state. Bug 479021 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 16:16:10 EDT --- python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 524332] Review Request: dualscreen-mouse-utils - Utilities for use with dual head setups using independend screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302038.n8UKcXlE023282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524332 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 16:38:31 EDT --- dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dualscreen-mouse-utils-0.5-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526122] Review Request: vim-latex - Tools to view, edit and compile LaTeX documents in Vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302037.n8UKbe88023073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reneploetz at gmx.de --- Comment #1 from Rene Ploetz 2009-09-30 16:37:39 EDT --- This is an unofficial review (as I'm not sponsored yet): +: ok !: needs to be fixed -: not applicable MUST Items: [+] rpmlint comes out clean (the no-documentation warning is not a problem when having a *-doc package, but see below) [+] packages are named according to package guidelines [+] spec file name matches base package name [+] the package license (Vim charityware) is correct and allowed in Fedora (the license is GPL-compatible) [+] license field matches the actual license [-] license packaged in %doc if available separately in original package [+] the spec file is legible and written in American English [+] package md5sum matches upstream (3f0e34465b577aac6448c9c95da71abf) [+] package builds fine in koji [-] locales are properly handled [+] no system libraries are bundled [-] if package installs libraries in default paths run ldconfig in %post/%postun [+] package owns the directories it creates [+] no file is listed twice [+] permissions on files are explicitly set (via defattr) [+] package must contain %clean with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [+] macros are consistently used [+] package does contain code and/or permissible content [+] (large) documentation goes into *-doc subpackage (see comments below) [-] header files must be included in a *-devel subpackage [-] static files must be included in a *-static subpackage [-] packaging pkgconfig(.pc) files requires to set "Requires: pkgconfig" [-] library files without a suffix (foo.so) must go into -devel subpackage if libraries with a suffix (e.g. foo.so.0.0) are present. [-] %{name}-devel packages must specify a fully versioned dependency on the %{name} package [-] packages must not contain any libtool (.la) archives [-] (most) GUI applications need to include a %{name}.desktop file [+] packages must not own any file or directory already owned by another package [+] first command in %install must be rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [+] all filenames in package are valid UTF-8 Should Items: [!] if source package does not include license text as separate file, packager should query upstream to include it [-] if available, description and summary in spec file should contain translations for non-English languages [+] packages build fine in mock [+] packages should compile on all supported architectures [+] packages work as expected in a short test [+] scriptlets - if used - must be sane [-] non-devel subpackages should require the base package [-] pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in -devel package [-] if package does require a file outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin, packager should require the package which provides the file (not the file alone) I have only a singe point to comment on: Upstream does not include any kind of license text as separate file. Did you try to query them to include a LICENSE file in their next release? This is by no means a requirement, but it would be better to verify that our package is legal even their homepage somehow vanishes and we have to prove our the license classification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302046.n8UKkSSF006747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(reneploetz at gmx.de | |) | --- Comment #23 from Rene Ploetz 2009-09-30 16:46:24 EDT --- Sorry for the delay in my response. I did a review about a week ago, but was unable to do other reviews in the last days, so I did not want to bother you by replying many times with a status update. I've done the following reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522613#c2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122#c1 I'm willing to do either more reviews and/or submit other packages if you feel I need more experience before sponsoring me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] New: Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 Summary: Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/mongodb/mongodb-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Mongo (from "humongous") is a high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database. MongoDB is written in C++ and offers the following features: * Collection oriented storage: easy storage of object/JSON -style data * Dynamic queries * Full index support, including on inner objects and embedded arrays * Query profiling * Replication and fail-over support * Efficient storage of binary data including large objects (e.g. photos and videos) * Auto-sharding for cloud-level scalability (currently in alpha) * Commercial Support Available A key goal of MongoDB is to bridge the gap between key/value stores (which are fast and highly scalable) and traditional RDBMS systems (which are deep in functionality). $ rpmlint mongodb-* mongodb.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/mongodb mongodb mongodb.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/mongodb mongodb mongodb.i586: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mongodb $prog mongodb-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package mongodb-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. I'm not a packager yet, but I have a sponsor, so please review! :) I'm especially concerned with the empty-debuginfo-package error. Should I disable the debuginfo-package altogether? This package depends on unittest: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Prebuilt rpms are available here: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 20:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526564] New: Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Summary: Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/unittest/unittest-0.50-62.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Unittest is a C++ unit test framework. Its design goals are to be simple, to be idiomatic C++, and to follow the basic xUnit style to the extent that doing so is compatible with the earlier goals. Its main differences from other xUnit frameworks are that it uses constructors and destructors for setup/teardown and that it requires you to represent tests as classes, instead of methods. I'm not a packager yet, but I have a sponsor, so please help with reviews! :) This package is needed to build the mongodb tests. rpmlint is a bit scary: unittest-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestPtrTest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestHolderTest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/SuiteTest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/ExistingBaseTest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/Helper.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/TestTest.o unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest unittest-devel.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest unittest-devel.i586: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/RegistryTest.o unittest-devel.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest rtld(GNU_HASH) unittest-devel.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/unittest-devel-0.50/test/unittesttest R 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526567] Review Request: mongodb - high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302115.n8ULFgof000403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526567 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-09-30 17:15:41 EDT --- your package is in a good shape, someone will sponsor you and review your package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526058] Review Request: sil-scheherazade-fonts - SIL Scheherazade Arabic Script Unicode Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302114.n8ULEtsu032499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(hedayat at grad.com) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:14:53 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this font! SIL fonts are usually high quality, it's a shame we do not package all of them yet like other distros do (hint hint) Package review: 1. current best practice is to avoid using the package name in the summary, please reword it without "SIL Scheherazade" (I know it was not always like this, and we haven't changed evey previous package yet). The reason is that package tools already display the package name next to the summary 2. (minor) you don't really have to use Caps Before Every Word (though that's a matter of preference) 3. (minor) I'm not sure it's a good idea to include your second description ?. All this technical mumbo-jumbo is likely to frighten normal users 4. it's not a good idea to depend on dos2unix for txt file conversion, you can usually attain the same results using just sed and iconv. Your package does not build as a result in mock, since dos2unix is not present in the buildroot + dos2unix FONTLOG.txt OFL-FAQ.txt OFL.txt /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BzkuMA: line 29: dos2unix: command not found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 If you intend to maintain more packages later it's a good idea to setup a mock instance on your system to test for this kind of mistake http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock 5. And lastly, please add some fontconfig rules. Just the default set + Monotype Naskh should be enough, unless there is something else you feel would help users. You have standard templates and documentation in fontpackages-devel (though the F11 version may be a little old, install the latest one it will work just fine in F11 too) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7288 And that's all for now NEEDINFO till you answer those (PS if you're not member of the packaging group yet, I can sponsor you, but I'll require 2-3 good font package submissions before; we've streamlined the process so much a single submission is not enough to judge if someone will become a good packager anymore) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302125.n8ULPjTQ002542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302124.n8ULOM95016218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:24:20 EDT --- This one is good. Just need spot to chime in now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525795] Review Request: libgtkhotkey - Platform independent hotkey handling for Gtk+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302128.n8ULSTgQ017676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525795 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 17:28:27 EDT --- libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libgtkhotkey-0.2.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302127.n8ULRRBh003531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-09-30 17:27:26 EDT --- Public Domain declaration in the license looks fine. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526544] Review Request: stomppy - Python stomp client for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302133.n8ULX1tl019714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526544 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-30 17:32:59 EDT --- The request for a LICENSE file generated a new release. Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/stomppy/stomppy.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/stomppy/stomppy-2.0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint is still clean http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721200 Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512079] Review Request: oflb-prociono-fonts - A serif font created by Barry Schwartz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302134.n8ULY79v006061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 17:34:05 EDT --- Therefore, this package is now ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging another font in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 21:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302145.n8ULj6T9024676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #23 from Luke Macken 2009-09-30 17:45:03 EDT --- Built in rawhide. EL-5 build waiting for python-zope-sqlalchemy, which I just built and pushed into bodhi, and also python-pylons, which I just made a branch request for (#526576) F-11 build is waiting on python-repoze-what-quickstart, which will be going out in the next updates push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302242.n8UMg65P011398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-09-30 18:42:05 EDT --- Updated package with changed summary and a couple of helper scripts which i forgot to include in the previous one. Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/mygui/mygui-2.3.0-2.1861svn.fc11.src.rpm I also launched a koji build, here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1721377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302240.n8UMefMc011003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-09-30 18:40:37 EDT --- I need to look at it some more (got distracted by other bug requests, and this is a complex package), however here are some remarks 1. rpm will evaluate your %global even with # (why did you want to comment it out?) 2. common_desc should be a global too 3. your -fixed subpackage contains font files that declare themselves as "Console". These should go in a "console" subpackage 4. not too sure if it'd be better to move console8x8 in its own subpackage or just rename or remap it (cf remapping template) 5. You can drop the duplicated Group: Applications/System lines, the main one will be inherited in modern rpm 6. why do you add a Requires(pre): fontconfig ? We do not require fontconfig in font packages. Do you have a special need? 7. what do you need xorg-x11-font-utils as BR for ? 8. I think you can specify a different LICENSE field per subpackage, can you check with spot how he'd prefer the licensing reported ? (mixed licensing packages are a PITA) I feel if it'd be better if each subpackage was tagged with just the necessary license info (and included the corresponding license files) 9. fontconfig will happily use pcf.gz files, please compress your pcf files (if you're feeling ambitious ask behdad if he intends to support pcf.xz soon) That's all for this first partial review, will look more in depth tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302249.n8UMnxtn032672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #15 from Julian G 2009-09-30 18:49:57 EDT --- Sorry, busy week. I've updated the files now. http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient-1.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://files.4-web.net/qmpdclient/qmpdclient.spec Thanks for your support :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302250.n8UMosoY000838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #70 from Christian Krause 2009-09-30 18:50:45 EDT --- I've reviewed the new spec file and the new src.rpm: You've stated in the %changelog of the new spec file, that the following changes were done: - Own %%{_datadir}/%%{name} instead of %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/classes - Add Requires: %%{name} = %%{version}-%%{release} in subpackage. Unfortunately the fixes are not done in this spec file. Please can you verify, whether you've uploaded the wrong version of the spec file? Regarding the packaging of the GCJ AOT bits I've asked in #fedora-java whether it is really necessary in this specific case (jar files mostly used in a browser on the client) and they've agreed that it is not needed here. So once all changes are done which are stated in the spec file, I think all issues are solved. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302257.n8UMvkvn017316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 18:57:45 EDT --- fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302257.n8UMveQQ017261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-30 18:57:37 EDT --- fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 22:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302259.n8UMxCxX017652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #4 from Mel Chua 2009-09-30 18:59:11 EDT --- Dustin Diaz has been contacted - email text below. --- Hi, Dustin - I've got a quick and probably unusual request for you. Would you mind re-licensing check_one_check_all_javascript.php under something that's GPL-compatible? (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses) Here's why: We're working to deploy a zikula-based site (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight) for Fedora and would like to deploy a zikula module called ezcomments (http://code.zikula.org/ezcomments/) on that site. The ezcomments module uses your javascript, which is (since it was taken from your blog) licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.5 - so we can't package it for Fedora, and thus use deploy it on our site, because it isn't GPL-compatible. The longer story is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 - but anyhow, we'd greatly appreciate it if you could re-license the js; editing the php file to include the license text of one of the licenses at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses is all that's needed - if you can give us a link to that, we'll contact all the necessary downstreams. Thanks! --Mel Chua, on behalf of the Fedora Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 523343] Review Request: zikula-module-EZComments - Simple Zikula module that provides comment functions to other modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302304.n8UN45ru004598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343 --- Comment #5 from Mel Chua 2009-09-30 19:04:04 EDT --- Also pinged upstream maintainer Florian Schie?l (who keeps up the ezcomments extension) via the zikula community's private messaging interface, since there is no public contact email listed. I now see very, very clearly why we are so stringent about licensing for Fedora packages. Wow. --- Hi! Just wanted to let you know that we're working to get the javascript in the ezcomments module you maintain re-licensed to something GPL compatible, since we'd like to deploy your module on a zikula-based Fedora site. You can see everything that's going on at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523343. Thanks! --Mel Chua on behalf of the Fedora Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525453] Review Request: yum-rhn-plugin - RHN support for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302308.n8UN8OBw005398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525453 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:08:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302311.n8UNB0CU020076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mel at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mel at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Mel Chua 2009-09-30 19:10:59 EDT --- Taking this ticket as an indication that I'll be the maintainer of this package so that Toshio can proceed with the review. (Rahul is, however, planning on stepping in later and re-taking maintainership from me.) For context: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-09-29/fedora-meeting.2009-09-29-20.02.log.html starting at 20:25:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] New: Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-filterutil.spec SRPM URL: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-filterutil-0-0.2.20090915svn15.fc11.src.rpm Description: FilterUtil brings Pagesetter like filter rules to Zikula. This work is a backport of the module included in zikula 2.0. Note: this is for Fedora Insight, see https://fedorahosted.org/marketing-team/ticket/25. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526595] Review Request: zikula-module-filterutil - Pagesetter like filter rules for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302322.n8UNMOmX023295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526595 --- Comment #1 from Mel Chua 2009-09-30 19:22:22 EDT --- by way of explanation: I'm putting in this ticket as an indication that I'll be the maintainer of this package so that Toshio can proceed with the review. (Rahul is, however, planning on stepping in later and re-taking maintainership from me on both this and zikula-module-pagemaster.) For context: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-09-29/fedora-meeting.2009-09-29-20.02.log.html starting at 20:25:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526041] Review Request: luci - Web-based cluster management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302343.n8UNhsRp015475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526041 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:43:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 526303] Review Request: fped - A footprint editor used by openmoko developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302346.n8UNkMXl030920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526303 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:46:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481668] Review Request: spacewalk-koan: provides integration between spacewalk and koan. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302348.n8UNm6cY031417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481668 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:48:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522988] Review Request: afraid-dyndns - A dynamic DNS client for the free service afraid.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302349.n8UNn7hH017437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:49:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 525786] Review Request: popfile - Automatic Email Classification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302350.n8UNoJQt032589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525786 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:50:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302353.n8UNr3HC018985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:53:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 23:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 522935] Review Request: mod_gnutls - GnuTLS module for the Apache HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909302352.n8UNqXWJ018870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522935 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-30 19:52:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.