[Bug 521067] Review Request: felix-osgi-core - Felix OSGi R4 Core Bundle

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521067





--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com>  2009-09-03 10:03:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Only issue:  line 40 is too long
Fixed.
> 
> - md5sums and sha1sums match
> - licensing good
> - naming fine
> - rpmlint clean:
> 
> $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
> /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
> /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-core-javadoc-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
> felix-osgi-core.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-core
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> 
> For those playing along at home, Alex and I discussed the possibility of using
> the Eclipse version of these OSGi classes.  This would mean a tighter loop at a
> build level between Eclipse and Jetty.  It also would mean porting work to
> bring Felix up to the different (newer) versions of these OSGi classes in
> Eclipse.  At this time, it's probably easiest to have this separate, small
> implementation.
> 
> Also, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks to split their
> monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't file conflicts. 
> At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support JPackage compatibility,
> this is probably okay.  Longer term, it'd be nice to interoperate.  

New sources:
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core.spec
SRPM URL:
http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-core-1.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.