[Bug 521069] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr - Felix OSGi OBR Service API

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521069





--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com>  2009-09-03 10:52:58 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Only issue:  line 42 is too long :)
Fixed.
> 
> - md5sums match upstream
> - licensing fine
> - builds and installs fine
> - macros sane
> - naming good
> - files okay
> - rpmlint clean (maven warning is okay):
> 
> $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm
> /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
> /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/felix-osgi-obr-javadoc-1.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
> felix-osgi-obr.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
> /etc/maven/fragments/felix-osgi-obr
> 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> 
> As I said in bug #521067, it may be best to coordinate with the JPackage folks
> to split their monolithic felix package like you've done so that there aren't
> file conflicts.  At the moment, since Fedora doesn't explicitly support
> JPackage compatibility, this is probably okay.  Longer term, it'd be nice to
> interoperate.  

New sources:
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr.spec
SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/felix-osgi-obr-1.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.