[Bug 520721] Review Request: gprof2dot - Generate dot graphs from the output of several profilers

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 10 05:06:10 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520721


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-09-10 01:06:08 EDT ---
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.

Generally I'd recommend using svn export instead of svn checkout as the latter
generates .svn directories which aren't useful  for a tarball release.  Not a
huge deal, of course.

I'm not sure the test suite does much of anything.  I guess it shows that the
program doesn't die, but without a set of expected data it has nothing to
compare the generated output against.

Looks good to me.

* source files match upstream (compared manually after following checkout 
  instructions)
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.                                                              
* description is OK.                                                          
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   gprof2dot = 1.0-0.1.20090901svn.fc12
  =
   /usr/bin/env
   python

* %check is present and the test run at least doesn't crash.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list