[Bug 524119] Review Request: nmon - Nigel's performance MONitor for Linux

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524119





--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-09-19 10:16:57 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks for the input Dominik & Jussi. I have implemented the changes in Jussi's
> comments and will refer Nigel (the original author) back to your comments
> Dominik as he has 'control' of the makefile. 
> 
> Jussi - if I add %{?dist} to the release tag then the src rpm becomes labelled
> with the os version. Is this normal? because this would mean having to release
> a different version for each current version of Fedora, where I think that the
> spec file could be modified to support all versions (adding any necessary
> changes when new releases are made).

Yes, it is. The spec file is completely general, and if you build e.g. a .f11
srpm on Fedora 10 you'll get out a .f10 RPM.

> Does anyone know the normal method for testing this on alternate distributions.
> I have a qemu vm running Fedora 11, and have found a few issues which may or
> may not be to do with the new OS, or this particular installation, namely gcc
> builds with debug info in the rpm, rather than in a seperate rpm. I don't know
> if this is a rpmbuild or gcc issue. This does require fixing as it is issued as
> a warning when running rpmlint on the binary rpm files.  

Do you have redhat-rpm-config installed?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.