[Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Sep 21 16:44:25 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091


Toshio Kuratomi <tkuratom at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(a.badger at gmail.co |needinfo?
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #24 from Toshio Kuratomi <tkuratom at redhat.com>  2009-09-21 12:44:24 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Any news concerning the license for lightboxXL.js?

David, Eric, J5, did any of you hear anything back about this?

IIRC -- the first option was lighthbox relicense and the analysis here was that
would probably not happen.  David, I know you sent off an email; did you hear
back?

The second option was that upstream would replace lightbox.  Eric did you hear
back on that?

The third option was that we'd coordinate with upstream on what a valid
replacement library would be and perform the port.  J5, how is that going?

> Should I fix the other problems first?  

>From a package review standpoint, yes.  If no one(here or upstream) is working
on the licensing issue, we aren't going to get this package in, though :-(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list