[Bug 525211] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 25 05:06:45 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525211





--- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com>  2009-09-25 01:06:43 EDT ---
yes, i agree that gplv3 is not compatible with gplv2, however regarding to
this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_about_interpreted_languages_.28perl.2C_python.2C_etc.29.3F_If_I_have_a_package_written_in_an_interpreted_language.2C_and_it_pulls_in_code_.28of_the_same_language.29_from_a_different.2C_independent_package_at_runtime.2C_should_I_take_its_license_into_account_when_tagging_my_package.3F
it should be ok. i will ask on fedora-legal about this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list