[Bug 525808] Review Request: pigz - Parallel implementation of gzip
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 25 23:13:13 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525808
--- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah at gmail.com> 2009-09-25 19:13:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Good:
> * Naming follows the packaging guidelines
> * license is contained in README and README is included in the documentation
> * Spec file is readable
> * Source matches with source from canonical upstream
> * No locales
> * Not a library
> * No bundled libraries
> * Not relocatable
> * Directories created by package and no others are owned
> * No duplicate files listed
> * Permissions set properly
> * Proper %clean
> * Macros used consistently
> * Code, not content
> * No %doc files affect program runtime
> * No subpackages
> * Not a GUI app
> * rm -rf run properly at beginning of %install
> * Filenames are valid utf-8
> * Package builds in koji
> * rpmlint clean
> * Tested that pigz compresses a file that can be decompressed by gzip and
> vice versa
>
> Needswork:
> * license should be "zlib"
oh ok.
> Providing you change the license when you import the package, this package is
> APPROVED.
Sure, thanks for the review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list