[Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 26 20:13:33 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> 2009-09-26 16:13:30 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPLv2)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz
f69db402e1869321cac72ffd2f77fa99 pm-utils-1.2.5.tar.gz.orig
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
See below - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
OK - check for outstanding bugs on package (merge reviews/rename/re-reviews).
Issues:
1. rpmlint says:
pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-bugreport-info.sh 0775
pm-utils.src: W: strange-permission pm-utils-99hd-apm-restore 0775
I think we can ignore those.
pm-utils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pm-suspend.log
Can be ignored per comment in the spec.
pm-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Can be ignored.
2. Some non blocking suggestions:
Might add a '-p' to your install lines to preserve timestamps of the sources?
Currently it's pointless to add smp_mflags, but if there are ever more source
files
to compile it might be worth considering.
I see no blockers at all, so this package is APPROVED.
Sorry for the long delay here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list