[Bug 526055] Review Request: alure - AL Utilities REtooled

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526055





--- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli at gmail.com>  2009-09-29 08:17:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Few notes about the package:
> - Name package just "alure". Prefixing library packages with lib is debian
> scheme, we try to name package closer to upstream name.
> This:
> > %setup -q -n alure-%{version}
> could then be changed simply to (default for -n is %{name}-%{version}:
> > %setup -q
> 

OK

> - About license, if they does not name LGPL version anywhere, that means any
> version of LGPL and license tag should contain LGPLv2+.
> They also do carry some GPL'ed script in docs. If it ends up in package, this
> adds GPL+ to tag.  

Right, i found this one from author:
http://www.nabble.com/ALURE-1.0-Debian-packages-td23972602.html
confirming it's LGPLv2+.
Some files under doc are part of NaturalDocs, which is under GPLv2+.
So License is LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+

Thanks for looking at this, updated file here:
Spec URL: 
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/alure/alure-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.