From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 02:08:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001010208.o0128q6x012732@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 21:08:51 EDT --- Well, while "Requires: gtk-sharp2 themonospot-base mono-core" can be removed with "BuildRequires: mono-devel", "BuildRequires: gtk-sharp2-devel themonospot-base-devel" are still needed (and same on other themonospot-foo packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 02:08:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] New: Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Summary: Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ArpON.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON-1.90-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: ArpON (Arp handler inspectiON) is a portable handler daemon It has a lot of features and it makes Arp a bit safer. It uses static arp inspection and dynamic arp inspection as two kinds of anti arp poisoning techniques. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1897321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 11:49:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 06:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011149.o01BnStd026565@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-01 06:49:27 EDT --- Hi, here is an informal review of your package, while waiting to be sponsored ^^. Just a few remarks, the general look of the .spec seems pretty good ^^. Be very careful, your binary is not build using the Fedora Project flags currently: see this piece of build log that shows it: + /usr/bin/make linux gcc -g -g -Wall -Werror -lpthread -lpcap -ldnet -lnet -L/usr/local/lib -I/usr/local/include -DLINUX -o arpon arpon.c + exit 0 You must specify these flags in your make command, like this: %build %{__make} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" linux By the way, you should leave in make the parallel build option by default: %build %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" linux No particular reason to skip it in my opinion, even if there is only one file to compile... For the moment ^^. You should also remove the INSTALL file, it is useless if delivered with a package ^^ See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:41:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011341.o01DflVg011810@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #5 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 08:41:46 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added themonospot-base-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:42:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011342.o01Dg8Xa001262@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #5 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 08:42:07 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added themonospot-base-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:43:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011343.o01DhNco001424@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #8 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 08:43:22 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm changed: - added themonospot-base-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:48:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011348.o01Dmp7O013345@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 Enrico Scholz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu | |-chemnitz.de --- Comment #4 from Enrico Scholz 2010-01-01 08:48:49 EDT --- It would be nice when the modules and database backends are packaged in separate subpackages; e.g. the current monolithic package requires all the gtk, postgresql, mysql, qt... stuff. People might want to run a GNUnet server in a dmz where gtk + qt are not wanted and where only one database backend is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:54:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011354.o01DsldC003417@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #7 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 08:54:46 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.2-2.fc12.src.rpm change: - gtk-sharp2-devel - themonospot-base-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 13:56:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 08:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011356.o01Duq3I003833@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Maser 2010-01-01 08:56:50 EDT --- While you are at it there is 0.8.1 available now, maybe that makes some of the patches unnecessary already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:13:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011413.o01ED44N017058@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #6 from Enrico Scholz 2010-01-01 09:13:03 EDT --- fwiw, the dialog, postgresql and qt4 location patches can be alternatively solved by ---- %prep ... mkdir -p _dialog _postgresql/include ln -s %_includedir/dialog _dialog/include ln -s %_includedir _postgresql/include/postgresql %build ... # put qt4 stuff into $PATH p=`pkg-config --variable=bindir Qt` PATH=$p:/usr/bin:/bin %configure ... \ --with-dialog=`pwd`/_dialog \ --with-postgres=`pwd`/_postgresql \ ---- The hardcoded 'lib' can and should be solved as in patch4 (the whole dynamic stuff in GNUNET_get_installation_path() is very flaky and not needed for Fedora). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:38:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551721] New: Review Request: php-channel-pdepend - PHP Depend PEAR channel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-pdepend - PHP Depend PEAR channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551721 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-pdepend - PHP Depend PEAR channel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-channel-pdepend.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-channel-pdepend-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PHP Depend PEAR channel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:39:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551722] New: Review Request: php-channel-phpmd - PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpmd - PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551722 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-phpmd - PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-channel-phpmd.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-channel-phpmd-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:41:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551723] New: Review Request: php-pdepend-PHP-Depend - PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pdepend-PHP-Depend - PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551723 Summary: Review Request: php-pdepend-PHP-Depend - PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-pdepend-PHP-Depend.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-pdepend-PHP-Depend-0.9.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:44:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551722] Review Request: php-channel-phpmd - PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011444.o01EipFc022257@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551722 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:44:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551723] Review Request: php-pdepend-PHP-Depend - PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011444.o01EiqYZ022263@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551723 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:44:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:44:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551724] Review Request: php-phpmd-PHP-PMD - PHPMD - PHP Mess Detector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011444.o01Eio3M022250@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551724 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |551723, 551722 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2010-01-01 09:44:50 EDT --- forgot description: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpmd-PHP-PMD.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpmd-PHP-PMD-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PHPMD - PHP Mess Detector -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:45:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551721] Review Request: php-channel-pdepend - PHP Depend PEAR channel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011445.o01EjTol011964@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551721 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:45:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551723] Review Request: php-pdepend-PHP-Depend - PHP_Depend design quality metrics for PHP package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011445.o01EjSeJ011957@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551723 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |551721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:42:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551724] New: Review Request: php-phpmd-PHP-PMD - PHPMD - PHP Mess Detector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-phpmd-PHP-PMD - PHPMD - PHP Mess Detector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551724 Summary: Review Request: php-phpmd-PHP-PMD - PHPMD - PHP Mess Detector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-phpmd-PHP-PMD.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-phpmd-PHP-PMD-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:55:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011455.o01Et45c013545@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #7 from Enrico Scholz 2010-01-01 09:55:02 EDT --- You might want to hack in '-Wl,--as-needed' LDFLAGS, e.g. by --- %configure ... \ LDFLAGS='-Wl,--as-needed' sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool --- Generated binaries/libraries add too much dependencies else; e.g. 'ld -u -r' shows unused libraries like WARN: /usr/bin/gnunetd: linked against unused libraries /lib64/libz.so.1 /usr/lib64/libextractor.so.1 /usr/lib64/libadns.so.1 /lib64/libgcrypt.so.11 /lib64/libgpg-error.so.0 /usr/lib64/libgmp.so.3 /usr/lib64/libltdl.so.7 /lib64/libm.so.6 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 See http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf, "3.9 Inter-Object File Relations" for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 14:57:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 09:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011457.o01EvKRP013942@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #4 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 09:57:19 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-3.fc12.src.rpm changed: - added themonospot-base-devel and qyoto-devel as BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 16:10:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011610.o01GA6nm026206@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 11:10:04 EDT --- For 0.8.2-2 * Unversioned Obsoletes ------------------------------------------------------------- Obsoletes: themonospot ------------------------------------------------------------- - This unversioned Obsoletes statement may cause problem in the future (for example when "themonospot" comes back). It is highly recommended to specify the version for Obsoletes. On Fedora the following is sufficient (so change to below) ------------------------------------------------------------- Obsoletes: themonospot < 0.8.0 ------------------------------------------------------------- For this package I don't think adding virtual Provides for themonosport is strictly needed, however you may want to add the following: ------------------------------------------------------------- Provides: themonospot = %{version} ------------------------------------------------------------- * %description ------------------------------------------------------------- themonospot-base is core package for themonospot system. It install: - themonospot-base mono assembly in GAC (use from other gui applications) ------------------------------------------------------------- - Again I am not familiar with mono, however your %changelog says: ------------------------------------------------------------- * Wed Dec 30 2009 Armando Basile 0.8.2-1 - removed GAC use ------------------------------------------------------------- So this description may be outdated. Please fix this if necessary. Other things are okay. Please fix above when importing into Fedora CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (themonospot-base) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 16:33:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011633.o01GXLiZ030551@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 11:33:20 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (themonospot~console) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 16:44:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011644.o01GiwEs000345@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 11:44:57 EDT --- One more thing: * Detecting dependency - To make it sure that all dependencies are correctly detected, change the permission of .dll files to 0755 explicitly as ------------------------------------------------------------- chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/themonospot/*.dll ------------------------------------------------------------- at the end of %install section ( currently 2 dll files has 0644 permission and unfortunately rpmbuild does not check dependency for .dll files if they don't have executable permission ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 16:53:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 11:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011653.o01GrlxX001662@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 11:53:45 EDT --- For 0.2.2-2 * desktop-file-install usage https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage - As I wrote in my comment 2, "--vendor=fedora" is now deprecated and should be removed (and the name of the desktop included in binary rpm should be "themonospot-gtk.desktop") You can use ------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -fr %{buildroot} make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install desktop-file-install \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --delete-original \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/themonospot-gtk.desktop ------------------------------------------------------- or even: ------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -fr %{buildroot} make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/themonospot-gtk.desktop ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:00:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] New: Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 Summary: Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cnucnu.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cnucnu-0-1.20100101.fc12.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Description: Cnucnu provides an upstream release monitoring service with bugzilla integration. See more at the project homepage at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_Release_Monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:02:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011702.o01H2R7P002995@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 12:02:26 EDT --- cc Till -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:09:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011709.o01H9mAq014995@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 12:09:47 EDT --- Now - this package is correctly built from source - install directory proper - other things okay ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (themonospot-plugin-mkv) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:13:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011713.o01HDjdE015629@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #13 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:13:44 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc12.src.rpm changes: - changed file permissions for dll assembly after buildroot install - added versioning to Obsoletes - fixed description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:15:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011715.o01HFU8L005147@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #9 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:15:29 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.2-3.fc12.src.rpm changed: - modified desktop-file-install macro parameters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:20:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011720.o01HKnTj006377@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #5 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:20:48 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-4.fc12.src.rpm changed: - modified desktop-file-install macro parameters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:23:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011723.o01HNVap017167@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 12:23:29 EDT --- Very similar with -plugin-mkv review request (bug 550598) ------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (themonospot-plugin-avi) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:26:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011726.o01HQpEV017668@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 12:26:49 EDT --- rpmlint output: xcdroast.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version} xcdroast.src:104: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/bin xcdroast.src:105: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/icons xcdroast.src:106: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/sound xcdroast.src:109: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}-%{version}/*/* xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/TRANSLATION.HOWTO xcdroast.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xcdroast-0.98/ChangeLog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:29:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011729.o01HTpGt007748@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 12:29:50 EDT --- Okay, please write CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:33:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011733.o01HXsT0008421@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #24 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-01 12:33:48 EDT --- Some additional notes. * source file must not be called josm.tar.gz. It is too generic. It must have something that identifies the version and the release too. "When pulling from revision control, please remember to use a Name-version-release compatible with the Version and Release Guidelines. In particular, check the section on Naming Snapshots." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control A filename called like "josm-0.0.svn2255.tar.gz" would be a good choice. * Source file is not packaged correctly. There should be only one root directory. i18n directory should be one subdirectory. plugin directory must not be checked out (see comment #22). * package "manual" is not created. There is no file list. I don't know if this is an omission or manual is not required. * I editing/adding the following properties: version.entry.commit.revision version.entry.commit.date in patch0 and patch3 could be avoided by creating a REVISION file in the expected format (placing it among SOURCEs, with a name like josm-REVISION, and then copying it in the builddir in %prep) or using sed appropriately in %prep. In this way you should update these two patches much less often and not at each upstream release. BTW, the rest of both patches could be merged since the purpose is the same. * patch1 is not required. You already use build-classpath in %prep. Another, alternative, and perhaps more elegant way, to solve this issue is to use build-jar-repository: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-jar-repository * This line: ln -s $(build-classpath ant) lib is not needed and wrong. There is no need to put ant in that dir. * Patch2 should not needed. * There is a cleaner way to do the following: install -p %SOURCE1 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} chmod +x %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} just in one line: install -p -m 755 %SOURCE1 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:43:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011743.o01Hh7x9020786@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 12:43:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=381208) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381208) Suggested patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:48:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011748.o01Hmhdn021635@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 12:48:42 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (themonospot-gtk-gui) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:53:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011753.o01Hr8a2022451@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #15 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:53:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-base Short Description: Core component of Themonospot suite Owners: hman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:56:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226502] Merge Review: transfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011756.o01Hu6U4012320@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226502 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 12:56:05 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:54:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226502] Merge Review: transfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011754.o01HsUAw012132@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226502 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 226502 depends on bug 209865, which changed state. Bug 209865 Summary: bogus permissions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209865 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:52:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011752.o01HqSPV011802@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 12:52:26 EDT --- After application of patch, rpmlint is clean. When you apply the patch, be sure to modify the desktop file for the new location of the icon. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - After application of patch. - The patch lines that have been commented out should be removed completely. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - The files in src/ don't have any license statements. - The GPLv2 COPYING is attached => assumed license is GPL+. - Files in intl/ are under LGPLv2+. => License field should be "GPL+ and LGPLv2+", or the resulting "GPLv2+". Please ask upstream to clarify license and add license headers to all source code files. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK - Source URL bad, patch fixes it. - Source matches upstream. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - At least after application of patch. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK - After application of patch. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK - After application of patch. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Apply the patch and fix the license tag, then I'll approve the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:58:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011758.o01HwW97023127@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #10 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:58:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-console Short Description: Console application for Themonospot suite Owners: hman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:57:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011757.o01HvaEs023005@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #7 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:57:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-plugin-mkv Short Description: Matroska plugin for Themonospot suite Owners: hman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:56:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011756.o01HuisJ012456@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #7 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 12:56:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-plugin-avi Short Description: Avi plugin for Themonospot suite Owners: hman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 17:59:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011759.o01HxMp2012822@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-01 12:59:21 EDT --- If you want to add me in CC list, please use my FAS name (mtasaka). By the way adding me in CC list is not strictly needed (but feel free to do so if you want). Also set fedora-cvs flag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:02:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226502] Merge Review: transfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011802.o01I2uWj023783@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226502 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:02:54 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. ~OK - You might want to consider preserving time stamps with INSTALL="install -p" in 'make install'. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:21:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226315] Merge Review: prelink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011821.o01ILT2Y016065@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226315 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:21:27 EDT --- rpmlint output: prelink.src: W: no-url-tag prelink.src:215: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src:337: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src:364: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src:384: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src:540: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src:630: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_sysconfdir} prelink.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install prelink.x86_64: W: no-url-tag prelink.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/prelink prelink.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.prelink prelink.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/prelink prelink-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 12 warnings. - Fix the above. ** - I'd move the definition %define date 20090925 to the top of the spec file, change the %define to %global and add it also to the Release field, i.e. Release: 3.%{date}%{?dist} - Modernize obsolete BuildRoot to BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Move tests to %check phase. - Don't use %makeinstall, it's deprecated. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used - Change mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm cp -a %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/{sysconfig,cron.daily,prelink.conf.d} cp -a %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/prelink cp -a %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/prelink chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/prelink chmod 644 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/{sysconfig/prelink,prelink.conf} to install -D -p -m 644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/prelink.conf install -D -p -m 755 %{SOURCE3} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/prelink install -D -p -m 644 %{SOURCE4} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/prelink install -D -p -m 644 %{SOURCE5} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rpm/macros.prelink where the contents of cat > << EOF has been placed in SOURCE5. - Drop the %attr lines from %files, as they are unnecessary (default permissions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:29:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226375] Merge Review: rng-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011829.o01ITPVg027483@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226375 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:29:24 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:26:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226315] Merge Review: prelink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011826.o01IQhvb027171@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226315 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:26:41 EDT --- - Change %{_prefix}/sbin/prelink %{_prefix}/bin/execstack to %{_sbindir}/prelink %{_bindir}/execstack *** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - Source URL gives 404. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - Drop the unnecessary %attr lines as instructed above. MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, NEWS, README, THANKS and TODO to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. NEEDSWORK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:34:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551027] Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011834.o01IYNU4028134@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551027 --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-01 13:34:22 EDT --- Some update: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+-1.2.14-2.fc12.src.rpm I've added a patch to make nicotine+ call xdg-open as the default file browser/player/navigator (instead of rox/xmms/firefox). I added therefore a Requires on xdg-utils. Once the bug tracker of Nicotine+ will be back (some server problem), I'll submit the remaining patches upstream. rpmlint and mock are still happy ^^. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:37:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226375] Merge Review: rng-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011837.o01Ib5bM018000@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226375 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:37:04 EDT --- - Change Requires: /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service to Requires: chkconfig initscripts to speed up dependency resolution. - Patch1 but no Patch0? - Version is really 2, not 2.0. There's already an Epoch defined, so this could be rectified by an epoch bump. - Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/gkernel/rng-tools-2.tar.gz not http://download.sourceforge.net/gkernel/rng-tools-2.tar.gz Ideally %{version} macro should be used here. - %configure picks up correct compiler flags. make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" should be make %{?_smp_mflags} to enable SMP compilation. - You can drop mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sbindir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initrddir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man{1,8} as this is automatically done by make install. - If you %define _sbindir /sbin at the top of the spec file, you can use plain %configure and %{_sbindir} in %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:41:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226375] Merge Review: rng-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011841.o01IfjGV029290@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226375 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:41:44 EDT --- You might want to change the .gz suffixes to .* in %files. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Macros are mixed. After addressal to comment #2, there shouldn't be a problem anymore. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, NEWS and README to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 18:43:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226375] Merge Review: rng-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011843.o01IhgWD018995@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226375 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 13:43:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK Whoops, this is a negatory. According to the Package Naming Guidelines, the name of the package should be rng-tools, not rng-utils. The package should be renamed to rng-utils. The renamal could be done alongside with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:34:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011934.o01JYo1p031850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Armando Basile changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:36:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011936.o01Jac90032144@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-01 14:36:37 EDT --- * Properly mention the Classpath exception in the license. * Fixed "no prebuilt binary" check which didn't actually do anything. Spec URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome-4.0.14-2.fc12.src.rpm $ rpmlint java-gnome-4.0.14-2.fc12.src.rpm java-gnome-4.0.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-debuginfo-4.0.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-javadoc-4.0.14-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome.spec 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:44:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011944.o01JiKFo012167@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Armando Basile changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Armando Basile 2010-01-01 14:44:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-gui-gtk Short Description: Gtk gui for Themonospot suite Owners: hman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:42:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011942.o01Jg1Ds000476@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Armando Basile changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:41:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011941.o01Jfe9P000404@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Armando Basile changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 19:42:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001011942.o01JgIxQ000538@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Armando Basile changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 20:46:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551763] New: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 Summary: Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/lua-sec/lua-sec.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/lua-sec/lua-sec-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Lua binding for OpenSSL library to provide TLS/SSL communication. It takes an already established TCP connection and creates a secure session between the peers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 20:51:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551763] Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012051.o01KpQGv023177@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 --- Comment #1 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-01-01 15:51:26 EDT --- rpmlint is clean for all produced packages. SRPM builds fine in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 20:54:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551765] New: Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765 Summary: Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/prosody/prosody.spec SRPM URL: http://odysseus.x-tnd.be/fedora/prosody/prosody-0.6.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Prosody is a flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua. It aims to be easy to use, and light on resources. For developers it aims to be easy to extend and give a flexible system on which to rapidly develop added functionality, or prototype new protocols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 21:03:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551763] Review Request: lua-sec - Lua binding for OpenSSL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012103.o01L3jUJ024998@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 21:03:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551765] Review Request: prosody - Flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012103.o01L3iNs024991@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551765 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |551763 --- Comment #1 from Johan Cwiklinski 2010-01-01 16:03:43 EDT --- rpmlint is not quiet for this package, but all warning should be safely ignored: $ rpmlint prosody-0.6.1-1.fc12.src.rpm prosody.src:40: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This one should be ok since upstream does not use autotools but a specific configure script ; which does not provide any '--libdir' flag. $ rpmlint prosody-0.6.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/prosody prosody prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/prosody prosody prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/prosody prosody prosody.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/prosody prosody prosody.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/prosody $prog non-standard uid/gid are ok because the package creates it own user for the daemon to run. incoherent-subsys is due to the use of '$prog' in the initd file. Package builds fine in mock. Note that to use ssl possibilities, we need to have lua-sec which is not yet in the repositories (I've made a review request for this one also : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551763) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:20:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551027] Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012220.o01MKhBl027491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551027 --- Comment #2 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-01 17:20:42 EDT --- New update: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+-1.2.14-3.fc12.src.rpm I finally updated the previous patch to enable also audio effects playing using GStreamer by default (instead of calling play, other choices available in the settings of the application were ogg123 and GStreamer). Since the application allows the user to use custom sound effects by selecting his own audio files, Gstreamer seems to be the better choice to let users playing a large amount of media types. gstreamer-python was already set as a Requires previously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:46:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012246.o01Mk3rb010338@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:46:01 EDT --- ping mclasen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:44:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225699] Merge Review: dmraid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012244.o01MiC8w010127@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225699 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:44:12 EDT --- 3rd ping to lvm-team. Please respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:45:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012245.o01MjjGo010299@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:45:42 EDT --- What's the status of the uuidd ownership? Still, let's close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:46:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012246.o01MkH3d031722@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:46:14 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:43:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012243.o01MhMeA031344@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:43:20 EDT --- ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:48:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226346] Merge Review: python-pyblock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012248.o01Mmxje011339@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226346 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:48:58 EDT --- ping pjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:46:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012246.o01MkhaR010488@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:46:40 EDT --- ping 3rd time? Please respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:48:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012248.o01MmEVA010683@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:48:13 EDT --- cc pnemade ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:54:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012254.o01MsDOU012175@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at linuxnetz.de Depends on| |550470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:52:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:52:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012252.o01Mq0ki011840@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:51:58 EDT --- ping 3rd time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:52:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012252.o01MqAtT032690@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:52:08 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:56:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:56:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012256.o01MuY3e000898@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:56:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:55:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012255.o01MtrlR000793@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:55:50 EDT --- ping Ed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 23:00:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012300.o01N0SBg013160@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 18:00:26 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:56:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012256.o01MuAFI012468@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:56:07 EDT --- OK, let's hope libg3d gets reviewed soon so that we can close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:59:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012259.o01MxUg0013028@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:59:27 EDT --- ping ashay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:56:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012256.o01MudFu012588@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:56:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:59:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012259.o01MxIvZ012986@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:59:15 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:56:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012256.o01Mum2R000976@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:56:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 23:00:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012300.o01N0Mgh001994@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #67 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 18:00:14 EDT --- Seems like you forgot to mark this bug as solved by the first release of the package. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:58:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012258.o01MwxQF001298@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:58:56 EDT --- Seems like you forgot to mark this bug as solved by the first release of the package. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 22:58:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012258.o01MwGrq001191@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 17:58:12 EDT --- Seems like Eric forgot to file this bug as solved by the nilfs-utils update that was (or should have been?) shipped in Fedora 11. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 23:03:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012303.o01N3txa013739@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 18:03:51 EDT --- ping? ship the updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 1 23:02:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001012302.o01N2ag7013562@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-01 18:02:33 EDT --- Carl: you need to mark fedora-cvs to ?, not +. The CVS admins pick up the ?:s and change them to +:s when they have fulfilled your request. Changed flag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 01:25:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020125.o021PTOZ004364@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #22 from Jerry James 2010-01-01 20:25:21 EDT --- Now that I'm done making merry, I had a chance to work on this again. I found several more SBCL-specific changes that needed to be made to the PVS code base, so I've reworked the patches. Give this a try: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.src.rpm This includes changes that were checked into PVS subversion over the last couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 02:29:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020229.o022T5uq014972@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG 2010-01-01 21:29:04 EDT --- Fixed the issues mentioned above: Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ArpON.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON-1.90-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:27:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:27:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020327.o023RxRc025029@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:27:58 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:28:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020328.o023SvhJ025252@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |13-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:28:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020328.o023Srn8014046@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:28:51 EDT --- sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:28:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020328.o023S3hZ013861@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:32:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020332.o023WN9r026312@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:32:21 EDT --- gummi-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:34:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:34:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020334.o023YtI9026830@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.12.0-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:32:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020332.o023WRxR026336@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:36:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020336.o023aHWR015880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:36:16 EDT --- sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:34:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020334.o023YDYa015466@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:34:13 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:34:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020334.o023Yp27015576@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:34:50 EDT --- rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:34:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020334.o023YHDu015484@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8-2.fc12 |0.8-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:39:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020339.o023dQ8o027969@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:39:25 EDT --- gummi-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:36:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020336.o023aLqJ027285@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|13-1.fc11 |13-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:39:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020339.o023dUkG017373@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-2.fc12 |0.4.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:37:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020337.o023buup017040@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:37:55 EDT --- rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:38:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020338.o023c05x017058@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.12.0-2.fc12 |0.12.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 03:37:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020337.o023b9wd016712@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-01 22:37:05 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mediawiki-LdapAccount'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 05:24:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020524.o025OKio013694@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-02 00:24:18 EDT --- pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 05:25:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020525.o025P9cZ013803@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-02 00:25:06 EDT --- pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 06:04:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020604.o02647Bf009184@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-01-02 01:04:06 EDT --- #001 The Makefile links -lpthread, and so BuildRequires needs to include glibc-devel. BuildRequires: glibc-devel #002 The Makefile is using -L/usr/local/lib and -I/usr/local/include. But, your shipped package will be in /usr. So, you need to replace these references in the Makefile to use %{_libdir} and %{_includedir} respectively in %setup section. %{__sed} -e "s|/usr/local/lib|%{_libdir}|" Makefile > Makefile.ex touch -r Makefile Makefile.ex %{__mv} Makefile.ex Makefile %{__sed} -e "s|/usr/local/include|%{_includedir}|" Makefile > Makefile.ex touch -r Makefile Makefile.ex %{__mv} Makefile.ex Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 07:02:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020702.o0272Ohu020040@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 --- Comment #6 from Parag 2010-01-02 02:02:23 EDT --- Thanks, I thought previous owner already fixed this package. I got it in June 2009 but was not knowing that time about this review. Will work on this on Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 07:07:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020707.o0277Lmc032317@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #34 from David Timms 2010-01-02 02:07:14 EDT --- As far as I can see CVS space under devel/system-config-selinux has not been created, and there hasn't been any updates to: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec to take into account (comment #31) There is about 6x weeks left until F13: 2010-01-26 Feature Submission Deadline 2010-02-16 Alpha Freeze -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 07:22:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544660] Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020722.o027MDEU024171@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 02:22:12 EDT --- Quick notes before review : - Requires php-cli is redundant with php-pear - replace pear.swiftmailer.org.xml by %{name}.xml (cf PHP Guidelines) I think using REST version provided (here 1.3) as version could be a good idea for this package where version have no really meaning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 07:44:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546451] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020744.o027iZ6C006657@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 02:44:33 EDT --- Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PHP %[xmldir} => use %{pear_xmldir} HTML_Template_IT.xml => %{name}.xml %{peardir} => %{pear_phpdir} + %{pear_testdir} %{peardir}/* => please, expand to avoid to own already owned dir BuildRequires => (version which provides needed macros) php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 Requires => (missing) Requires(post): %{__pear} Requires(postun): %{__pear} Provides => (missing) Provides: php-pear(HTML_Template_IT) = %{version} %prep : no need to run pear command here, see some other php-pear-extension, could also try the pear-pear-PEAR-Command-Packaging Caution : package.xml still a V1 format which could cause some issue. I recommend to convert it to V2 during prep (see pear convert) Are you ready to maintain this package which seems not really active upstream ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 07:54:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020754.o027sNdc008071@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 02:54:21 EDT --- Juste a comment about Requires: php >= 4.2.0 When requiring a specific PHP version, check must be done against php-common to avoid unwanted deps (mainly httpd) In this case, 4.2.0 have really no sense. I don't know any version (even EL4) which use older. Running pci on fpdf.php show it requires php-gd. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:00:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551721] Review Request: php-channel-pdepend - PHP Depend PEAR channel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020800.o0280A3s030263@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551721 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 03:00:07 EDT --- Same notes than for 544660 - Requires php-cli is redundant with php-pear - replace pear.pdepend.org.xml by %{name}.xml (cf PHP Guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:01:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551722] Review Request: php-channel-phpmd - PHP Mess Detector PEAR channel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020801.o0281JpV009092@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551722 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 03:01:18 EDT --- Again ;) - Requires php-cli is redundant with php-pear - replace pear.phpmd.org.xml by %{name}.xml (cf PHP Guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:25:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020825.o028Pc3j002212@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Kent 2010-01-02 03:25:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-newgem.spec > SRPM: > http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-newgem-1.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm > > Matthew: Feel free to help. I'd be glad and thankful if you could (co-)maintain > this once it's in. Sure thing. I'm now requiring this for another package I'm working on so I'll post my update. I tried to record my modifications in the changelog. Hopefully they all make sense. Only other improvement I'd like to make is to break the ri/rdoc content, tests and Rakefile into a separate -doc package giving the main one a smaller footprint. Any issue with that? (In reply to comment #8) > 1] rpmlint complaining > rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.1-3 > ['1.5.2-1.fc12', '1.5.2-1'] > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/templates/bin/app.rb.erb > 0644 /usr/bin/env > rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge > rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/website/version.js > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/plain_theme/USAGE > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem_simple/templates/lib/templates.rb > rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/test_helper.rb > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/long_box_theme/USAGE > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem/templates/script/console.erb > 0644 /usr/bin/env > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/USAGE > rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_generators/install_website/templates/script/txt2html > 0644 /usr/bin/env > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 4 warnings. > > *license ok > *naming ok > *spec file legible > *build ok > > please fix rpmlint messages I've fixed the one regarding the crlf issue but the others are harder to quash as they are all templates/placeholder files used by newgem to create new projects. Is there a nicer way to have rpmlint ignore these? For now I've added a note in the spec file. > SPEC file here and in src.rpm seems different -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:29:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020829.o028T15G013939@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Kent 2010-01-02 03:29:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-newgem.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-newgem-1.5.2-2.fc13.src.rpm * Fri Jan 01 2010 Matthew Kent - 1.5.2-2 - Drop versioning on requirements as this is a new package. - Drop unused ruby_sitelib macro. - Add a rubyabi macro. - RPM_BUILD_ROOT -> buildroot - use one style of macros. - Fix bin/env ruby searching in bin/newgem. - Remove duplicate hoe dependency. - Add check phase. - Fix another crlf (#504476). - Add note about rpmlint complaints (#504476). mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-newgem.spec /var/tmp/old_results/rubygem-newgem-1.5.2-2.fc13.* rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/templates/bin/app.rb.erb 0644 /usr/bin/env rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/test/fixtures/home/.rubyforge rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/website/version.js rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/plain_theme/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem_simple/templates/lib/templates.rb rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_theme_generators/long_box_theme/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/app_generators/newgem/templates/script/console.erb 0644 /usr/bin/env rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/executable/USAGE rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.5.2/newgem_generators/install_website/templates/script/txt2html 0644 /usr/bin/env -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:38:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551817] Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020838.o028cT9l016074@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:38:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020838.o028cVmT016086@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 08:38:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551817] New: Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551817 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-templater - Ruby framework for building code generators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-templater.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-templater-1.0.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Templater is a Ruby framework for building code generators. It has the ability to both copy files from A to B and also to render templates using ERB. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-templater.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-templater-* rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Action/destination%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Generator/glob%21-c.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Directory/identical%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Spec/Helpers/CreateMatcher/matches%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Generator/render%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/templater-1.0.0/spec/templates/glob/hellothar.html.%feh% %feh rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Template/exists%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/File/invoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Action/source%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Template/invoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/EmptyDirectory/identical%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/EmptyDirectory/revoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Discovery/discover%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/templater-1.0.0/spec/templates/glob/hellothar.%feh% %feh rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/File/revoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Spec/Helpers/InvokeMatcher/matches%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Generator/invoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/EmptyDirectory/exists%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/EmptyDirectory/invoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Template/revoke%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/ArgumentDescription/valid%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/File/exists%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Generator/match_options%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/File/identical%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-templater-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/templater-1.0.0/ri/Templater/Actions/Template/identical%3f-i.yaml %3f 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 26 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 09:11:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 04:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020911.o029BvbC010808@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #4 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-02 04:11:56 EDT --- Shakthi : about your comment #001: since glibc-devel is a dependancy of gcc, and since gcc is part of the minimal build system in Fedora (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2), there is no need to set glibc-devel as a BR. By the way the RPM builds fine in mock without it. About #002: moreover, I don't think there is a real need to modify the Makefile. /usr/lib and /usr/include (or /usr/lib64 and /usr/include when running Fedora on a x86_64) already belong to the search paths by default of gcc. It's not a problem to leave the Makefile looking for headers and libs in /usr/local since this directory is empty anyway in a mock chroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 09:36:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 04:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001020936.o029ak7F015597@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #5 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-02 04:36:45 EDT --- Arun: just a cosmetic issue about the $RPM_OPT_FLAGS variable I suggested before. In fact, you should replace $RPM_OPT_FLAGS by %{optflags}, since you are using a "macro-style" in your .spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 10:43:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 05:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544660] Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021043.o02AhHjZ007134@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian 2010-01-02 05:43:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Quick notes before review : > - Requires php-cli is redundant with php-pear > - replace pear.swiftmailer.org.xml by %{name}.xml (cf PHP Guidelines) > > I think using REST version provided (here 1.3) as version could be a good idea > for this package where version have no really meaning. As with the other channels I got for review I just copied the one from php-channel-doctrine. Removing php-cli makes sense. I am not sure about the version number, the channel format is version 1.0 and all other php-channel-* seem to use that at the moment. It might be worth discussing that on the fedora-php list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 11:06:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 06:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544660] Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021106.o02B6LNB031623@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2010-01-02 06:06:20 EDT --- Note about version is only a note. There is actually no meaning to this field. I have use REST version for latest phpunit channel update, only because I think it could be usefull ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 12:51:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 07:51:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021251.o02CpAWV022178@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 Julian Aloofi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |julian.fedora at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #9 from Julian Aloofi 2010-01-02 07:51:05 EDT --- I suppose nobody will see this CVS request as the fedora-cvs flag is not set... Just pointing this out, as I'd like to see the docklets in the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 13:16:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 08:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021316.o02DGVfT027168@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-02 08:16:29 EDT --- Changelog format is not correct: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs This is why you get a warning in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 13:21:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 08:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021321.o02DLnPN008210@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-01-02 08:21:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) | About #002: moreover, I don't think there is a real need to modify the | Makefile. /usr/lib and /usr/include (or /usr/lib64 and /usr/include when | running Fedora on a x86_64) already belong to the search paths by default of | gcc. It's not a problem to leave the Makefile looking for headers and libs in | /usr/local since this directory is empty anyway in a mock chroot. \-- It is not just a question of it working in mock chroot, but, how upstream sources should use it on different platforms, and target builds. Ideally, upstream should use a PREFIX for the install variable, and not hard-code it everywhere in the Makefile. From the .spec file one should be able to override the PREFIX with the preferred location. Thanks for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 13:33:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 08:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021333.o02DXZsa010434@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-02 08:33:33 EDT --- You must not install irrelevant files like the INSTALL file in %doc: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 14:10:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 09:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] New: Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 Summary: Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: singh.roshan08 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub.spec SRPM URL: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub-0.8.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Opendchub is the hub software for Direct Connect P2P network. It runs as a daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 14:45:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 09:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021445.o02Ej18h023475@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-02 09:45:00 EDT --- * Simplify the .jar symlink mess. Spec URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome-4.0.14-3.fc12.src.rpm $ rpmlint java-gnome.spec java-gnome-4.0.14-3.fc12.src.rpm java-gnome-4.0.14-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-debuginfo-4.0.14-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-javadoc-4.0.14-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 15:45:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 10:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551857] New: Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 Summary: Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guillermo.gomez at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/fwsnort/fwsnort.spec SRPM URL: http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/fwsnort/fwsnort-1.0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: fwsnort translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules and generates a Bourne shell script that implements the resulting iptables commands. This ruleset allows network traffic that exhibits Snort signatures to be logged and/or dropped by iptables directly without putting any interface into promiscuous mode or queuing packets from kernel to user space. In addition, fwsnort (optionally) uses the IPTables::Parse module to parse the iptables ruleset on the machine to determine which Snort rules are applicable to the specific iptables policy. After all, if iptables is blocking all inbound http traffic from external addresses, it is probably not of much use to try detecting inbound attacks against against tcp/80. By default fwsnort generates iptables rules that log Snort sid's with --log-prefix to klogd where the messages can be analyzed with a log watcher such as logwatch or psad (see http://www.cipherdyne.org/psad). fwsnort relies on the iptables string match module to match Snort content fields in the application portion of ip traffic. Since Snort rules can contain hex data in content fields, fwsnort implements a patch against iptables-1.2.7a which adds a "--hex-string" option which will accept content fields such as "|0d0a5b52504c5d3030320d0a|". fwsnort is able to translate approximately 60% of all rules from the Snort-2.3.3 IDS into equivalent iptables rules. For more information about the translation strategy as well as advantages/disadvantages of the method used by fwsnort to obtain intrusion detection data, see the README included with the fwsnort sources or browse to: http://www.cipherdyne.org/fwsnort/ Also via git at fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 15:46:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 10:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021546.o02Fkrwd022398@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-02 10:46:52 EDT --- Hi, here is an informal review of your package, while waiting to be sponsored ^^. Just a few remarks about BR, the general look of the .spec seems pretty good ^^. * since glibc-devel is a dependancy of gcc, and since gcc is part of the minimal build system in Fedora (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2), there is no need to set glibc-devel as a BuildRequires. * However, after checking the configure.in, I think you'll need to set perl-devel as a BuildRequires. * By the way, according to the file configure.in, the BR libcap-devel is only required if the option ? --enable-switch_user ? is explicitely called. Otherwise it is useless. If you think that this option is useful, it may be a good thing to enable it, to offer as many enabled features as possible in your binary. You should check that you have defined all the required BuildRequires with mock: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:11:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539989] Review Request: nettop - top-like program for network packets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021611.o02GB13r006711@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539989 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-02 11:10:59 EDT --- Offsite http://srparish.net/scripts/ seams down. Meantime where links to upstream bugreports for each patches? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:14:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021614.o02GEKAY027324@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |551860 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:18:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021618.o02GI1FA007892@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-02 11:17:58 EDT --- Sven Lankes, do you plan push updates for EPEL5 and Fedora 11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:19:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021619.o02GJLvO008277@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-02 11:19:18 EDT --- Thomas Janssen, do you plan push updates for Fedora 11 too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:24:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021624.o02GOMRm009693@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-02 11:24:21 EDT --- While bug 551534 is not a strict blocker for this review, bug 551860 should surely be fixed before this bug is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:46:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021646.o02Gkg5a013108@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #15 from Sven Lankes 2010-01-02 11:46:41 EDT --- The latest release is in EPEL5-stable and and I'm not planning to push it to F11 or EPEL4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:52:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021652.o02GqxTs014602@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-02 11:52:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I'm not planning to push it to F11 or EPEL4. Then for what you request F-11 branch before? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:56:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021656.o02Gu80S015035@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|chitlesh at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2010-01-02 11:56:07 EDT --- I apologize, I can't carry on this package review since I'll be offline for one month. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation If no one has taken up the review, I'll do when I'll be back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 16:58:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538299] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021658.o02GwY9q015422@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-02 11:58:32 EDT --- For new package you shouldn't use vendor tag for desktop-file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Also missing BR glib. Build package failed - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1898860 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 17:12:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021712.o02HCB1Z017518@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #17 from Sven Lankes 2010-01-02 12:12:09 EDT --- I have requested the branch so that I could push tmux it to F11 if anyone requested it. Noone has asked for tmux on F11 yet. If you want tmux for F11 please file a bug and I'll see if it works on F11 (it should) and push an update. Let's not continue this discussion in this closed bug please - file a new one if you want an F11-package and if there is anything else, send me an email. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 17:12:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021712.o02HCsZJ017631@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #23 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-02 12:12:51 EDT --- Hooray!! This updated package now works on 32-bit (using Fedora 11). It builds without hanging. I also used the "mortality.pvs" demo, and PVS quickly proves "Socrates is mortal". That's good, since Socrates has been dead a long time :-). Anyway, that worked in 64-bit, now it works (again) in 32-bit. I found no rpmlint warnings in this version (at least for the 32-bit version). I did "rpmlint ./RPMS/i586/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc11.i586.rpm ./SRPMS/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc11.src.rpm ./SPECS/pvs-sbcl.spec" and it reported: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'll try 64-bit Fedora 12 next; presuming that works, I'll then walk through the package guideline checklist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 18:22:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021822.o02IMfPo017295@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-02 13:22:40 EDT --- This PVS also seems to work on 64-bit Fedora 12. It builds fine. There are no rpmlint warnings or errors on this one, either: rpmlint pvs-sbcl.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.src.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 18:30:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:30:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021830.o02IUIRg018466@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #23 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-02 13:30:12 EDT --- I might have some interest in this package, spec file links seems dead, any private copy floating around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 18:44:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021844.o02Ii4jl001303@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #12 from Carl Byington 2010-01-02 13:44:02 EDT --- done. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7-1.15-8.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1898980 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 18:43:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:43:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021843.o02IhO5d021117@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen 2010-01-02 13:43:23 EDT --- Hello Pavel, yes, i push updates always for every supported Fedora the same time. kde-partitionmanager-1.0.0-2 is as well in Fedora 11 and rawhide :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 19:28:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021928.o02JSpiT013664@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #30 from Carl Byington 2010-01-02 14:28:48 EDT --- done. I just added atlas-devel, since it won't build without blas-devel. It seems that removing blas-devel would require extensive patches to ./configure or ./configure.in, which is probably not what you meant. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-7.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1898999 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 19:43:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 14:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001021943.o02Jhjeb015814@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #25 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-02 14:43:43 EDT --- Okay, I reviewed the package using the guideline checklist at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines I have questions/issues for two points: * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] NO. There are some files that are stored as shared library files: /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/ Granted, these probably aren't shared by other packages, but they MIGHT be. * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] ??? NOT SURE. There are ".so" files not in a -devel package, but it's not clear that they SHOULD be in a -devel package. Comments? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something? There are a few things I need to do, too. I can't check the svn version at this instant (can't download), so I hope to do that soon. I also intend to do a koji build, which will answer some. Other than that, looks like we're off. Here's the guideline checklist results: * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] OK. No warnings or errors. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2]. OK. * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. At least, I don't see any violations. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK (GPLv2+). * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK. It has the usual GPL LICENSE file. The PVS website also specifically states that it is GPL-licensed: http://pvs.csl.sri.com/download.shtml * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK. See /usr/share/doc/pvs-sbcl-4.2/LICENSE * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK. * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK. * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ??? I need to check this later. This package uses an SVN version, to pick up necessary patches. The spec file documents that the extraction uses: svn export -r 5477 https://spartan.csl.sri.com/svn/public/pvs/trunk pvs-4.2 I'm having trouble downloading from SVN at this moment; I'll try again later. * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] OK. * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] OK to my knowledge. I only tried x86, 32-bit and 64-bit. Koji would answer this. * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK to my knowledge. Koji would answer this. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NA. Only English. * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] NO. There are some files that are stored as shared library files: /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/ Granted, these probably aren't shared by other packages, but they MIGHT be. * MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] OK. There's a "/usr/lib64/pvs/wish", but this is a *directory* not wish itself. * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] NA. * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] OK. I looked at %files, looks okay. * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] OK. Again, %files looks okay. * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] The %files section has %defattr(); rpmls looks okay. * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] NA * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] NA * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] NA * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] NA * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] NA * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] ??? NOT SURE. There are ".so" files not in a -devel package, but it's not clear that they SHOULD be in a -devel package. Comments? * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] NA * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] NA * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] OK. This was added recently as part of the packaging process. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] OK. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] OK. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] OK. ASCII. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [28] NA * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [29] Don't, but not required. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [30] I'll try to do this later. * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [31] ??? Partly done. I used two. Mock/koji should help determine for the others. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK. I did smoke tests for 32-bit and 64-bit. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [32] NA. * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [23] NA * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [22] NA * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [33] NA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:09:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022009.o02K9Iv1020187@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:09:16 EDT --- Are you sure you account name is right here? I cannot see that account in the fedora account system. Please check your account name and add a new request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:10:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022010.o02KAXqm007589@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:10:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:16:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022016.o02KG7Tb021204@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:16:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:11:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022011.o02KBK8s020534@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:11:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:12:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022012.o02KCaup020707@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:12:34 EDT --- No problem. Please do continue to pressure upstream into setting up a proper repository/etc. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:13:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022013.o02KD3Vu007997@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 Jean-Francois Saucier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:14:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022014.o02KEEZO008312@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:14:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:12:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:12:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] New: Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 Summary: Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfsaucier at infoglobe.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager-0.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Font Manager is an application that allows users to easily manage fonts on their system. Although designed with the GNOME desktop environment in mind, it should work well with most major desktop environments such as XFCE, Enlightenment, and even KDE. Here is the koji scratch build result: F11 : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899011 F12 : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899009 F13 : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899013 The only error rpmlint gave me is on the SPEC file and I think it can be safely ignored after my research : font-manager.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python I need someone to sponsor me for this package. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:20:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022020.o02KKWng022020@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:20:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:17:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022017.o02KH8YZ021503@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:17:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:19:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022019.o02KJnnT009642@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:19:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:23:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022023.o02KNSqx010295@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:23:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:22:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022022.o02KMG7S010079@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-02 15:22:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:25:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022025.o02KPaKq010598@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-02 15:25:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > done. I just added atlas-devel, since it won't build without blas-devel. It > seems that removing blas-devel would require extensive patches to ./configure > or ./configure.in, which is probably not what you meant. > > http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec > http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-7.fc12.src.rpm > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1898999 The spec file is still revision 6. I haven't had a look at the spec file yet, but the magic trick is to define the blas library as --with-blas="-L%{_libdir}/atlas -lf77blas -latlas" instead of --with-blas="-lblas". in %configure. Anyway, you should get the idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:38:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022038.o02Kc5cn025334@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #26 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-02 15:38:04 EDT --- I've resolved most other questions, other than the library-file items above (the 2 MUSTs), but I got a weird difference between the svn version and what you sent. First, though, the good news. Koji (scratch) build with dist-f12 worked correctly: $ koji build --scratch dist-f12 ./pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.src.rpm ... 1899006 build (dist-f12, pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.src.rpm): open (ppc04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 3 done 0 failed 1899006 build (dist-f12, pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091229svn.fc12.src.rpm) completed successfully Also, silly me, the spec uses "ExclusiveArch" and I've tested both of them, so obviously we're fine in terms of architectural support. HOWEVER, when I downloaded the source code using the spec directions (including svn), I found this incredibly tiny difference: [dwheeler at eve SOURCES]$ diff -u -r pvs-4.2 ~/temp/pvs-4.2 diff -u -r pvs-4.2/lib/bitvectors/bv_mult_div_rem.pvs /home/dwheeler/temp/pvs-4.2/lib/bitvectors/bv_mult_div_rem.pvs --- pvs-4.2/lib/bitvectors/bv_mult_div_rem.pvs 2002-12-18 20:23:50.000000000 -0500 +++ /home/dwheeler/temp/pvs-4.2/lib/bitvectors/bv_mult_div_rem.pvs 2002-12-18 20:23:50.000000000 -0500 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ % % Author: Bart Jacobs % Started: Wednesday 24 May 00 10:59:26 bart at frustratie -% Last-modified: $Date: 2002-12-18 18:23:50 -0700 (Wed, 18 Dec 2002) $ +% Last-modified: $Date: 2002-12-18 20:23:50 -0500 (Wed, 18 Dec 2002) $ % Last-modified by: $Author: owre $ I can't see how this change makes a *difference*, but it's still a difference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 21:00:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022100.o02L06Dm029338@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #8 from Armando Basile 2010-01-02 16:00:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-plugin-mkv Short Description: Matroska plugin for Themonospot suite Owners: hman-it Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 21:00:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022100.o02L0lXJ029434@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #12 from Armando Basile 2010-01-02 16:00:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-gui-gtk Short Description: Gtk gui for Themonospot suite Owners: hman-it Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:57:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022057.o02KvYkh028929@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #9 from Armando Basile 2010-01-02 15:57:33 EDT --- yes, my Fedora Account is hman-it New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-plugin-avi Short Description: Avi plugin for Themonospot suite Owners: hman-it Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 20:59:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 15:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022059.o02KxBam016457@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #17 from Armando Basile 2010-01-02 15:59:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-base Short Description: Core component of Themonospot suite Owners: hman-it Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 21:00:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:00:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022100.o02L0Oaf016665@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #11 from Armando Basile 2010-01-02 16:00:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: themonospot-console Short Description: Console application for Themonospot suite Owners: hman-it Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 21:31:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022131.o02LVGRu022336@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-02 16:31:15 EDT --- pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pxe-kexec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0101 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 21:29:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022129.o02LT3Hw021839@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-02 16:29:02 EDT --- pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pxe-kexec'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 22:03:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 17:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022203.o02M3hOY009188@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2010-01-02 17:03:41 EDT --- There already exists a package named mysql-query-browser within the Fedora repositorys. Did you just miss that one or is it really necessary to do another review here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 22:06:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 17:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022206.o02M6f1i009691@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 --- Comment #2 from Dominic Hopf 2010-01-02 17:06:40 EDT --- Or am I just missing you splitted up the mysql-gui-tools package? *blush* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 22:24:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 17:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022224.o02MOHl6012528@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 --- Comment #24 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-02 17:24:15 EDT --- Redid the thing with help from a wieers rpm: koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899111 spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/fox/fox.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/fox/fox-1.6.37-1.fc12.src.rpm This is for the current stable version. TODO: pkgconfig issue. I don't see the Adie.stx location as blocker, it's more a bug in the app, not a thing to stop approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 23:15:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551027] Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022315.o02NFZZ6008302@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551027 --- Comment #3 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-02 18:15:34 EDT --- Another update: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+-1.2.14-4.fc12.src.rpm The Nicotine+ bug tracker works now, so I submitted the patches used in my SRPM upstream; the URLs to the corresponding open tickets are given in comments in the .spec file for each patch. The patch correcting the .desktop file provided was accepted upstream :-) : http://www.nicotine-plus.org/changeset?old_path=%2F&old=1353&new_path=%2F&new=1353 The other patches are waiting a review. I also discovered a bug in the application making help unavailable. I made a patch to correct this issue, and I submitted it also (see comments in .spec). This is the reason why I updated my SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 23:35:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022335.o02NZc0k011768@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-02 18:35:37 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/moblin-app-installer-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv2 only) OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2) OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible N/A - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 (git version) OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: - Missing docs: AUTHORS NEWS README TODO - BR gtk2-devel is redundant - no need to patch the desktop file, you can do this with desktop-file-install --remove-key ... If you patch it, please use the upstream patch from http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/moblin-app-installer/commit/?id=bc65c884d3a1ae37e69431417888126b2a3ea021 - applist.xml contains lots of packages that are not part of Fedora. At least the closed source apps like AdobeReader or World of Go should IMO be removed. Other packages need their names fixed (like kanagram, khangman and kiten which are part of the kdeedu package). - applist.xml should be packaged as separate package, see README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 23:54:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022354.o02NsaGR027302@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #12 from Sven Lankes 2010-01-02 18:54:34 EDT --- Sorry - I totally missed the fact that the drupal-bug was answered and closed. I looked into the licensing again and according to the drupal site every module that is included in the drupal cvs has to be licensed under the same terms as drupal itself (which is GPLv2+). So please fix the license tag in the spec I'll do a full review ASAP (I just skimmed through the spec, did a mock build and installed it on a drupal instance without issues so it should be good to go). BTW: drupal-views and drupal-cck also have GPLv2 as license - they should probably be fixed at least for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 2 23:58:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 18:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001022358.o02Nw9FP027865@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC|fabian at bernewireless.net | AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 00:06:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030006.o0306jgf017240@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-02 19:06:44 EDT --- pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 00:32:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030032.o030WGbL002048@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #27 from Jerry James 2010-01-02 19:32:15 EDT --- David, thanks for reviewing the package so thoroughly. The packaging guidelines say, in section 1.24, "In addition, every binary RPM package which contains shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun." This package does not put a shared library file in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, so this requirement is vacuously satisfied. The .so files are covered by section 1.22. Since the shared libraries are for PVS's use only, this section is also vacuously satisfied. I can't account for the timestamp difference you see, but since the time is off by 2 hours in one direction and the time zone is off by 2 hours in the other direction, they represent the same time. I live in the -0700 timezone. I'm guessing you live in the -0500 timezone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 00:52:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 19:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030052.o030q3Q9025574@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-02 19:52:02 EDT --- > Issues: > - Missing docs: AUTHORS NEWS README TODO > > - BR gtk2-devel is redundant > > - no need to patch the desktop file, you can do this with desktop-file-install > --remove-key ... If you patch it, please use the upstream patch from > http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/moblin-app-installer/commit/?id=bc65c884d3a1ae37e69431417888126b2a3ea021 > > - applist.xml contains lots of packages that are not part of Fedora. At least > the closed source apps like AdobeReader or World of Go should IMO be removed. > Other packages need their names fixed (like kanagram, khangman and kiten which > are part of the kdeedu package). > > - applist.xml should be packaged as separate package, see README Updated SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-app-installer-0.4.0-0.3.fc12.src.rpm Fixed all of the above. Dropped the applist.xml file and will look at what's required to package separately or use local repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 01:00:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030100.o0310HiU026850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #1 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-02 20:00:15 EDT --- Well... It contains a copy of box2d. Maybe that's formally ok since box2d is not packaged yet, but it's certainly not ideal. It probably best to DDRT from the start by packaging it separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 01:37:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 20:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030137.o031b6B5000468@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-02 20:37:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Dropped the applist.xml file and will look at what's > required to package separately or use local repos. Without the file the package is pretty useless, so please don't build it for F12 yet. Feel free to CC me when you submit a package for the applist data. Please also remove adobe-reader.png, skype.png and world-of-goo.png from the package because I'm not sure about there licenses. chromium.png should be ok I guess, but all these should be in the applist package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:10:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030210.o032A7QN005905@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-02 21:10:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - You need to add 'hicolor-icon-theme' as a requirement to avoid issues with > the ownership of the %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor directory Requiring hicolor-icon-theme is not strictly needed because gtk2 already requires it. It is however recommended. > - Can you please take a look at your BRs . Isn't gettext needed by intltool not on older releases such as EPEL, so I suggest to leave it in. > The rpmlint output > > [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint pino* > pino-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources This one is fixed in with the new package. (In reply to comment #3) > - Update to 0.1.0 Please update to 0.1.1 and then I will review the package. Some more comments: - Timestamps of both the spec and the source are one year in the future. Please take care of the timestamps, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - (Try to) Use Fedoras waf instead of the included version to build the package. - %description should be more detailed and end with a dot. - Don't hardcode /usr in --prefix=/usr. Use the %{_prefix} macro instead, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros - You could use a few more wildcards: Instead of %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/actions/mentions.svg %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/actions/timeline.svg %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/pino.svg %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/pino_fresh.svg use %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/*/*.svg But this is minor and up to you. The rest looks fine, package works as described. Looking forward to see it in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:13:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - Small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030213.o032Di5f006506@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: flaw - |Review Request: flaw - |F.L.A.W is a small |Small multiplayer action |multiplayer action game |game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:21:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551911] New: Review Request: monodevelop-boo - A boo plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-boo - A boo plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-boo - A boo plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-boo-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This is a simple boo plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:21:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551912] New: Review Request: monodevelop-java - A boo plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - A boo plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551912 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-java - A boo plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-java-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This is a simple Java plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:22:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551913] New: Review Request: monodevelop-vala - A vala plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-vala - A vala plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551913 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-vala - A vala plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-valaa-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This is a simple vala plugin for monodevelop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:23:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551914] New: Review Request: monodevelop-database - A database plugin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - A database plugin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551914 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-database - A database plugin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-database-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: This addin for monodevelop give support for multiple database systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:27:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551913] Review Request: monodevelop-vala - A vala plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030227.o032RlCG009029@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551913 --- Comment #1 from Paul F. Johnson 2010-01-02 21:27:46 EDT --- URL correction http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-vala-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 02:26:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 21:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551915] New: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - A gdb debugger addin for monodevelop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - A gdb debugger addin for monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551915 Summary: Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - A gdb debugger addin for monodevelop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://www.all-the-johnsons.co.uk/fedora/monodevelop-debugger-gdb-2.2-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: A debugger plugin for monodevelop which uses gdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 03:48:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 22:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030348.o033mbai003254@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 03:46:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 22:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030346.o033kj7G022818@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #28 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-02 22:46:45 EDT --- > I can't account for the timestamp difference you see, but since the time is off by 2 hours in one direction and the time zone is off by 2 hours in the other direction, they represent the same time. You're right! They're the same time, and that text is the only "difference". That is a weird thing that svn does, but that's a clear explanation... it appears that in certain cases, svn uses the local timezone when retrieving, and thus I see a "difference" that isn't really a difference at all. Great; that means that that MUST is resolved. And I see what you mean about the .so files. You're right, those "MUST"s are vacuously satisfied. So: all requirements are met. Thank you SO MUCH for packaging PVS; this one required real work to make it 64-bit-ready, and was *tricky* for other reasons too. Great job. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 04:17:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030417.o034HVnv008598@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Jerry James 2010-01-02 23:17:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pvs-sbcl Short Description: Interactive theorem prover from SRI Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 04:22:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 23:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030422.o034MDoX009455@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-02 23:22:12 EDT --- What's DDRT? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 05:35:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 00:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532286] Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030535.o035Zsot020225@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 Jean-Francois Saucier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfsaucier at infoglobe.ca --- Comment #1 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-03 00:35:52 EDT --- > treeline.x86_64: E: no-binary I think you should add this to your spec file to specify that your package is not arch specific : BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 08:04:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 03:04:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030804.o0384g5T012784@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-03 03:04:41 EDT --- All issues have been fixed, the package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 08:14:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 03:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551940] New: Review Request: php-symfony-YAML - The Symfony YAML Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-YAML - The Symfony YAML Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551940 Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-YAML - The Symfony YAML Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-symfony-YAML.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/php-symfony-YAML-1.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Symfony YAML Component. Symfony YAML is a PHP library that parses YAML strings and converts them to PHP arrays. It can also converts PHP arrays to YAML strings. rpmlint is silent Koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 09:20:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 04:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549821] Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030920.o039Kgfx027299@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2010-01-03 04:20:41 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap-1.2.44-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 09:58:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 04:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538558] Review Request: kde-partitionmanager - KDE Partition Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001030958.o039wQfX024283@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538558 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 04:58:24 EDT --- Oh, thanks. It seams you just forgot point bug number when push update to it and message bout it does not appeared there. I do not seen in repository directly - my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 10:18:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 05:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031018.o03AIM3f028181@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2010-01-03 05:18:20 EDT --- Installing a /usr/sbin/install-info executable seems dangerous as we already have /sbin/install-info. If this executable is required, I suggest installing it somewhere outside of the default $PATH, for example %{_libdir}/dpkg. Development related packages are named *-devel in Fedora instead of *-dev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 10:55:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 05:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031055.o03Atqdk002847@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-03 05:55:51 EDT --- Some comments: a) you can remove python from req, pygtk2 will pull that, drop commas too. b) spell out the file names in %files c) you have to handle the desktop file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files d) Drop INSTALL from %doc e) why is these needed: %attr(0755,root,root) and %attr(0644,root,root) in %files needed? f) never seen _datarootdir used before, why not _datadir? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 11:18:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031118.o03BIEZJ019147@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 06:18:13 EDT --- Yes, existing mysql-query-browser is a part of mysql-gui-tools which we would now obsolete and separate packages. And this package is not just part of separated mysql-gui-tools. From version 5.0r14 there no tarball release produced for Linux and no build support. This package, what present on review is mostly written from scratch (off course good history and knowledge I try get in future :) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 11:20:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031120.o03BKLwR007444@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2010-01-03 06:20:19 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Spec file matches base package name. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - Licenses field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code (the code is provided under 3 different licenses) - BuildRequires are correct (tests will depend on selenium-server once imported, also see comment #2) - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - Rpmlint is clean. - Builds in mock for rawhide. This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 11:22:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031122.o03BMVC5007881@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 06:22:29 EDT --- > The warning being announced by rpmlint appears to be due to the capitilization > of HTML. No. It says what summary starts from lower letter. It want see it as "Standards-compliant HTML filter library" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 11:47:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031147.o03BlZvj024060@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #7 from leigh scott 2010-01-03 06:47:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Development related packages are named *-devel in Fedora instead of *-dev. dpkg-dev doesn't look like a -devel package as it doesn't have any headers or development libs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 11:48:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031148.o03BmJ5l012199@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #8 from leigh scott 2010-01-03 06:48:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > Development related packages are named *-devel in Fedora instead of *-dev. > > > dpkg-dev doesn't look like a -devel package as it doesn't have any headers or > development libs. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 wrong link http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/dpkg-dev/filelist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 12:02:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031202.o03C23lO014647@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 07:02:01 EDT --- No one has asked you to add tmux to Fedora :) You start it process, request some branches and stop on middle. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 12:45:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 07:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031245.o03CjdnO001379@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-03 07:45:37 EDT --- Pavel, Sven joined the Fedora Project before you and (unlike you) he knows the new package process. If you want to request a new branch, please file a bug or write him a mail, but please let this review rest in order to avoid useless email notifications to the people that are subscribed to this bug. Thanks for your understanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:13:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031313.o03DDiUv006516@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Runge 2010-01-03 08:13:41 EDT --- Version Bump 0.12 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899449 spec: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint.spec srpm: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint-0.12-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:20:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031320.o03DKxTK007589@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:19:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530743] Review Request: tmux - A terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031319.o03DJYCA007352@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #20 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 08:19:31 EDT --- Guys, I do not even try say what anything don't known new package process. I really do not try say anything bad. But there nothing subject to new bugreport! I do not want request new branch at all!!! I only mention what Sven forgot import tmux in *already requested* ( there before, comment 9: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743#c9 ) and created F-11 branch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:22:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031322.o03DMJMs028348@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 --- Comment #3 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-03 08:22:17 EDT --- I updated the Summary as suggested; here are the updated .spec file and SRPM: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jakarta-commons-math/jakarta-commons-math.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jakarta-commons-math/jakarta-commons-math-2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:32:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031332.o03DWZHX029930@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-01-03 08:32:33 EDT --- Debian's dpkg-dev is a *-devel package in Fedora's terms. The fact, a package contains headers or development libs is just one crition amongst many qualifying a package as a *-devel package, but not the only one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:43:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031343.o03DhKkA011804@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #18 from Michal Ingeli 2010-01-03 08:43:19 EDT --- Thanks for cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 13:41:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031341.o03DfNxV011517@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-03 08:41:19 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-CSV-1.10-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 14:06:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031406.o03E65um003910@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 09:06:03 EDT --- Spec and srpm links is broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 14:28:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 09:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031428.o03ESS4o019938@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #2 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-03 09:28:27 EDT --- Hi, Thanks for reviewing my package. I have removed glibc-devel. > * However, after checking the configure.in, I think you'll need to set > perl-devel as a BuildRequires. perl-ExtUtils-Embed needs perl-devel as its dependency, so i have not included it in BuildRequires. > * By the way, according to the file configure.in, the BR libcap-devel is only > required if the option ? --enable-switch_user ? is explicitely called. > Otherwise it is useless. > If you think that this option is useful, it may be a good thing to enable it, > to offer as many enabled features as possible in your binary. Thank you for noticing this. I have included it: %configure --enable-switch_user I have checked it with mock, it is running fine. However it was first time that I was using mock. I would like you to take a look :-). Link to updated spec and srpm: SPEC: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub.spec SRPM: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 15:25:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031525.o03FPLW7018102@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #3 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-03 10:25:20 EDT --- > perl-ExtUtils-Embed needs perl-devel as its dependency, so i have not included > it in BuildRequires. You're right, excellent :) mock runs find indeed, and rpmlint is silent on your SRPM, your binary RPM and the debuginfo one. I don't see any problem, I think your RPM is OK :-) Just a little comment about the Group tag: isn't it more appropriate to set it to " Applications/Internet"? Just my personal opinion about your Description also, but I find it a little bit "laconic" ^^. Maybe you could use the description provided on the opendchub home page to make it more precise ^^. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 16:07:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031607.o03G73XH005875@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #21 from Dave M 2010-01-03 11:07:00 EDT --- Quick questions while preparing 4.23: 1. "perl(Locale::gettext)" is automatically detected Not arguing - but the actual module is perl-gettext. I took this to be something different since perl-Locale-gettext does not exist. If you are sure it is the same thing (or, at least, that it will still pull in the right requirement), then I will remove it as a requirement. Since perl-libwww-perl (or perl(libwww-perl)) does not show up after running the command "rpm -qv --requires clamtk", I will keep it in as a requirement. 2. The GUI.pm license language has been updated and will be reflected as such in 4.23. 3. The po/gettext files contain the line: "This file is distributed under the same license as the ClamTk package." As they are submitted with ClamTk, do they all have to have full license statements, or does this suffice? 4. Due to time constraints, I will likely not be able to review/sponsor other packages. I am always happy to help; however, my time is limited to either development or $something_else. I hope this is not a blocker. Thank you for continuing to help. 4.23 will likely be released around 17 Jan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 16:11:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031611.o03GBI9s026112@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #4 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-03 11:11:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Applications/Internet"? > Just my personal opinion about your Description also, but I find it a little > bit "laconic" ^^. Maybe you could use the description provided on the opendchub > home page to make it more precise ^^. I am the maintainer of the project as well. Thanks for the suggestion, I was also not sure in which group I should put it to. I think this should fix all the issues. New spec and srpm: SPEC: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub.spec SRPM: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub-0.8.1-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 16:19:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031619.o03GJJ4n008466@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 11:19:18 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 16:17:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031617.o03GHC2M027112@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 11:17:11 EDT --- Legend: + - Ok. - - Error. +/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement. = - N/A. MUST Items [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [pasha at x-www tcpreen]$ rpmlint * 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum tcpreen-1.4.4.tar.bz2 tcpreen-1.4.4_reviewed.tar.bz2 09196ecb0116b6ecef425d680ba03e83 tcpreen-1.4.4.tar.bz2 09196ecb0116b6ecef425d680ba03e83 tcpreen-1.4.4_reviewed.tar.bz2 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899716 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899734 [=] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [=] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [=] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [=] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [=] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [=] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [=] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [=] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [=] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [=] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. I'm not found any issues. Package APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 17:01:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031701.o03H1Ei2004110@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-03 12:01:12 EDT --- It's short for "I can't spell Do The Right Thing". :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 17:08:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031708.o03H8p31005547@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-03 12:08:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Quick questions while preparing 4.23: > > 1. "perl(Locale::gettext)" is automatically detected > > Not arguing - but the actual module is perl-gettext. - The rpm name "perl-gettext" is based on the tarball name this binary rpm is created from. i.e. the name "perl-gettext" is named so just because this binary rpm is based on "gettext-%{version}.tar.gz" and this rpm's name does not exactly correspond to the module name this binary rpm actually provides. The virtual provides "Provides: perl(Locale::gettext)" is added by rpmbuild automatically because this binary has "Locale/gettext.pm" which contains "package Locale::gettext;". So this rpm (perl-gettext) actually provides the module perl(Locale::gettext), not perl(gettext), and the module name clamtk actually needs is perl(Locale::gettext), not perl(gettext), as shown in %_bindir/clamtk --------------------------------------------------- 26 use Locale::gettext; --------------------------------------------------- > I took this to be > something different since perl-Locale-gettext does not exist. If you are sure > it is the same thing (or, at least, that it will still pull in the right > requirement), then I will remove it as a requirement. - See above > Since perl-libwww-perl (or perl(libwww-perl)) does not show up after running > the command "rpm -qv --requires clamtk", I will keep it in as a requirement. - Here the module clamtk actually needs is "perl(LWP::UserAgent)", not "perl(libwww-perl)" or so, as shown in ClamTk/Update.pm: ------------------------------------------------------- 18 use LWP::UserAgent; ------------------------------------------------------- and perl-libwww-perl provides perl(LWP::UserAgent). The binary rpm name and virtual provides names the rpm actually provides is not the same, and using virtual provides/obsoletes list based on what perl module is acually used is much better. > 3. The po/gettext files contain the line: "This file is distributed under the > same license as the ClamTk package." As they are submitted with ClamTk, do > they all have to have full license statements, or does this suffice? - This is sufficient > 4. Due to time constraints, I will likely not be able to review/sponsor other > packages. I am always happy to help; however, my time is limited to either > development or $something_else. I hope this is not a blocker. - Unfortunately I won't sponsor anyone in need of sponsorship unless he/she submits another review request or does at least one pre-review of other person's review request . If you are not going to do so for now, I once withdraw reviewing this package so that you can find another sponsor candidate for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 17:27:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031727.o03HRLDw009486@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 12:27:19 EDT --- Legend: + - Ok. - - Error. +/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement. = - N/A. MUST Items [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [pasha at x-www dnstop]$ rpmlint * 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+/-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. You use sed for hack pathes in Makefile. I see more sane way report it issue to upstream and apply temporary patch. Off course if you want you can treat it as Fedora packaging related... [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum dnstop-20090128_reviewed.tar.gz dnstop-20090128.tar.gz 827a0d2020b157b925411dd30b6feff3 dnstop-20090128_reviewed.tar.gz 827a0d2020b157b925411dd30b6feff3 dnstop-20090128.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1899748 [=] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [=] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [=] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [=] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [=] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [=] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [=] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [=] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [=] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [=] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please consider report upstream about paths adjusting. In any case it is not stop-issue. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 17:43:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549590] Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031743.o03HhEuC012283@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 12:43:13 EDT --- Source must be URL, not only filename. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 17:45:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031745.o03HjAfI012623@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-03 12:45:09 EDT --- Why it is closed? You do not want maintain it anymore? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:18:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031818.o03IIqhi018536@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #2 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-03 13:18:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager-0.4.2-2.fc12.src.rpm > a) you can remove python from req, pygtk2 will pull that, drop commas too. Done. > b) spell out the file names in %files Done for some files (bindir and .desktop). I have a small question here. For example, I have %{_datadir}/font-manager/* that glob many files. Do I need to list all of them or the glob is alright in this case? > c) you have to handle the desktop file Didn't know of that one. Thanks for the pointer, I think it is solved now. > d) Drop INSTALL from %doc Done. > e) why is these needed: %attr(0755,root,root) and %attr(0644,root,root) in %files needed? I removed the %attr(0755,root,root) because this was not necessary. But if I remove the %attr(0644,root,root) one, the .desktop file get installed 0755. > f) never seen _datarootdir used before, why not _datadir? Fixed, I didn't see _datadir when I grep rpmbuild --showrc the first time. Also, I added this in %file section because the folder was not removed cleanly after a rpm -e : %dir %{_datadir}/font-manager/ Thank you very much for the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:30:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031830.o03IUdMm007763@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-01-03 13:30:38 EDT --- There is a missing dependency in rawhide. So i preferred to wait until that dependency is there, likely after mass rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:34:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031834.o03IYuFH008520@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2010-01-03 13:34:55 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Do we need to have it as specific server sub-package? - Spec file looks sane. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - License field in spec matches the content of tarball - License file included in package matches used code. - BuildRequires are correct - Builds in mock for rawhide, installation too. - Rpmlint is clean. This package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:33:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031833.o03IXaj0021556@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-03 13:33:35 EDT --- * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Wildcarding_Files_inside_a_Created_Directory * Instead of using %attr you could simply chmod -x the file in %prep or %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:42:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031842.o03IgdNf023082@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:42:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031842.o03Ig6uC022970@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-03 13:42:05 EDT --- Dzi?kuj?, Marek. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: selenium-core Short Description: A DHTML test execution framework Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 18:55:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031855.o03ItseC025809@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #4 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-03 13:55:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager-0.4.2-3.fc12.src.rpm I removed the %dir and the wildcards and I followed the guidelines in the link you gave me. I also used chmod -x in place of %attr. Is there a reason one is preferred? I thought that %attr would be better option than a direct chmod. Thank you for taking the time to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 19:14:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:14:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031914.o03JEJYC018664@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #1 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-03 14:14:18 EDT --- The license text is in the tarball but not packaged. Might as well add the readmes as well. So add "%doc COPYING doc/README doc/README.devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 19:37:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001031937.o03JbD3g004686@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Drake 2010-01-03 14:37:12 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. All those files are already part of the package, installed through the makefile. Is an explicit %doc required too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 20:18:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032018.o03KITAB011011@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-03 15:18:28 EDT --- Nice work, I like to use only blank line between %-sections and %{optflags} for $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, however that's me. I can do a formal review, however you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 20:39:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032039.o03KdRWR000848@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #13 from Stefan Riemens 2010-01-03 15:39:25 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 20:40:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:40:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032040.o03Ke2MX000936@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #6 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-03 15:40:01 EDT --- Pardon me if it's a stupid question but I don't really understand what you mean by "blank line between %-sections and %{optflags} for $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". I will try to continue my work to get a sponsor. Thanks a lot for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 20:49:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 15:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032049.o03Kntp7002902@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-03 15:49:54 EDT --- > %attr vs. chmod Hmm... there are no guidelines for everything. :) Though, %attr in the %files section is very explicit and reduces readability of the %files section. It's better to limit it to the special cases when you cannot avoid using it. That is when you need to set username, groupname, or security relevant permission bits. You want such special cases in the %files section to catch your eyes. As in "Caution! %attr is used, there's something special about that file/directory". On the contrary, using %attr only to set ordinary file access permissions is overuse of a macro. Imagine you would need to fix incorrect permissions of more files and also set special security relevant permissions on a few important files. Overuse of %attr adds "noise". The %prep section is the more convenient place where to fix ordinary access bits of files in a source tarball, e.g. using "find" commands. The .desktop file is 0755 because of a bug in the tarball's Makefile.am. Better fix it and submit the patch upstream. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:04:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032104.o03L4AQk018815@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-03 16:04:08 EDT --- mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:05:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032105.o03L5R8v018975@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-03 16:05:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Pardon me if it's a stupid question but I don't really understand what you mean > by "blank line between %-sections and %{optflags} for $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". > > I will try to continue my work to get a sponsor. I am sorry, a typo there, I mean I prefer %{buildroot} over $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Both are valid. You use two blank lines to separate e.g. prep and build: %prep %setup -q # first blank line # second blank line %build I prefer just one line. Anyway, these are just some pedantic hangups from my side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:21:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032121.o03LLdEP021334@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 --- Comment #25 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-03 16:21:38 EDT --- More fixes, should be mostly ok now, built and tested a FOX based application without issue. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/fox/fox.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/fox/fox-1.6.37-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:23:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032123.o03LNx3L021716@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #9 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-03 16:23:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager-0.4.2-4.fc12.src.rpm I patched the Makefile to fix the permission bug and I removed one blank line between the sections. Thanks to both of you, I really like what I learn during this review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:57:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032157.o03Lv1rf026778@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-03 16:57:01 EDT --- chordii-4.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chordii-4.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 21:56:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032156.o03Luvj2026761@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-03 16:56:53 EDT --- chordii-4.3-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chordii-4.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 3 23:24:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 18:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001032324.o03NOpAG009293@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-03 18:24:50 EDT --- Yes, using %doc is required for the license text (though not for the other documentation as far as I can tell): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Presumably the justification is to make sure it's marked as documentation in the RPM metadata, which seems like good thing to do for the readme files as well. Just rm the files at the end %install and use %doc instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 00:09:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040009.o0409k2A027636@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hicham.haouari at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-01-03 19:09:43 EDT --- Disabling the updates is straightforward, we just need to patch the prefs.ui file and arista-gtk file. The main concern is installing the locales files, the only way that i know is by importing some distutils extensions, if there is a better way, we should get it done and upstreamed. So, should we use python-distutils-extra ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 00:45:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040045.o040jbwP022546@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2010-01-03 19:45:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf-1.6-3.fc12.src.rpm Remi: Thanks - I stripped php completely - added a require for php-gd since php-gd requires php Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 00:48:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040048.o040mGbZ022915@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2010-01-03 19:48:15 EDT --- Thanks for catching that Pavel - I have updated the srpm and spec: Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier-4.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 00:48:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:48:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040048.o040mUol022957@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2010-01-03 19:48:29 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnstop Short Description: Displays information about DNS traffic on your network Owners: konradm Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 02:39:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 21:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187318] Review Request: mondo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040239.o042d8Ja021456@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187318 Bug 187318 depends on bug 462982, which changed state. Bug 462982 Summary: Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 02:39:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 21:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040239.o042d7U3021440@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #27 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-03 21:39:00 EDT --- This is build in F-11, F-12 and rawhide. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 02:47:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 21:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040247.o042lL2T022631@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-03 21:47:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Joshua, you started good. Do you intent continuing this review? He seems to don't... I agree to his informal review. ############################ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 03:08:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040308.o0438SkM015404@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #30 from Till Maas 2010-01-03 22:08:22 EDT --- What's the status here? Will you be able to submit a working spec file, soon, Konstantinos? Where is your spec file Kushal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 03:40:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040340.o043eN9d021630@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 --- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo 2010-01-03 22:40:22 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - Update to 0.1.1 - Using waf as BR - Updated description - Using rpmmacros in build section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 04:37:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552113] New: Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 Summary: Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssorce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libwiiuse/wiiuse.spec SRPM URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libwiiuse/libwiiuse-0.12-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: A library that implements access to wiiremote controllers via bluetooth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 04:43:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549590] Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040443.o044hJX3000555@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen 2010-01-03 23:43:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Source must be URL, not only filename. Should this point back to limesurvey's source URL? This was an embedded library that is being removed from limesurvey's source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 07:53:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040753.o047rGqt011522@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 --- Comment #3 from Frederic Hornain 2010-01-04 02:53:15 EDT --- Dear *, Suggestion made by Alagunambi Welkin have been achieved. You can now download the new releases at the following URL : http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/ The files are : - magento-1.3.2.4-2.fc11.noarch.rpm - magento-1.3.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm - magento-1.3.2.4-2.spec BR Frederic ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 07:57:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] New: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/hunspell-mai.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Maithili hunspell dictionaries koji scratch build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900296 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 08:19:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 03:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040819.o048Jsew015817@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-04 03:19:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CPAN-Inject Short Description: Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 08:43:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 03:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040843.o048hIe9020003@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 08:45:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 03:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040845.o048jrfA020447@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2010-01-04 03:45:51 EDT --- * source files match upstream: 4f65dda91fa576568e2b0be14bde4c4d mai_IN.oxt * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 08:51:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 03:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040851.o048ptcd011283@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag 2010-01-04 03:51:54 EDT --- Caolan thanks for quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mai Short Description: Maithili hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 08:53:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 03:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040853.o048rbVo022312@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-04 03:53:32 EDT --- Your source url is wrong, use http://downloads.sourceforge.net, not a specific mirror and %{version} macro: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/arpon/arpon/ArpON-%{version}/ArpON-%{version}.tar.gz Download with wget -N to get correct timestamp on tarball. Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL %{__install} -pm 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_sbindir} %{__install} -pm 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/ %{__install} -pm 755 arpon %{buildroot}%{_sbindir} %{__install} -pm 644 man8/arpon.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/ Could be done as %{__install} -D -pm 755 arpon %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/arpon %{__install} -D -pm 644 man8/arpon.8 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man8/arpon.8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:05:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040905.o0495Z8O013963@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-04 04:05:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: selenium-remote-control Short Description: Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:06:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040906.o0496pAQ014224@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2010-01-04 04:06:50 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:07:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040907.o04971eS014255@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-04 04:07:00 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: git-bugzilla Short Description: Attach patches to a bugzilla bug Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:25:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040925.o049Pd4e018501@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-04 04:25:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > OK, the "URL" and "Source" links can be added. > > About the licensing problem: I e-mailed the author of the package, whether he > has some more information about this. The files are used in "fixmacps" utility, > which fixes PostScript files generated on Mac computers. > > If the license will still be a problem, we will have to exclude this utility > and these two files from the package. Only Fedora Legal can give the definitive answer, but in my opinion we are not allowed to distribute such files and they have to removed even from the source archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:42:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040942.o049gve9032314@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:42:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225768] Merge Review: foomatic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040942.o049gemr032244@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225768 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:47:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040947.o049lLYS000451@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-04 04:47:20 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:50:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040950.o049owEn001121@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 04:50:54 EDT --- Upstream release 0.8.0 for maemo. Unfortunately there is no source tarball available at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:53:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226382] Merge Review: rusers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040953.o049rQBP023660@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226382 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jskala at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:55:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226384] Merge Review: rwho In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040955.o049tO2v023961@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226384 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jskala at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:57:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226556] Merge Review: xferstats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040957.o049vGgr002094@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226556 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jskala at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:59:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:59:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040959.o049xbOt024644@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at root.snowtree.se --- Comment #5 from Alexander Bostr?m 2010-01-04 04:59:35 EDT --- License http://www.boxbackup.org/license.html looks like "BSD with advertising", though it's not exactly the same. It's probably a good idea to let fedora-legal confirm that it's "close enough". See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 09:58:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544684] Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001040958.o049w5Cl002305@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544684 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2010-01-04 04:58:03 EDT --- [thomas at tusdell srpm-review-test]$ spectool -g gqradio.spec --2010-01-04 10:53:00-- http://download.sourceforge.net/gqmpeg/gqradio-1.9.2.tar.gz Resolving download.sourceforge.net... 150.65.7.130, 210.146.64.4, 198.142.1.17, ... Connecting to download.sourceforge.net|150.65.7.130|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2010-01-04 10:53:01 ERROR 404: Not Found. --------------------------- Please fix macro consistency: %name => %{name} Will do a full review later. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:04:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041004.o04A4SrO025519@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #23 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:04:25 EDT --- I mark this as a FE-DEADREVIEW and leave the files in place. Upstream is not answering and there wasn't a new release for a long period. Jussi, thank you for your time and your help with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:10:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524006] Review Request: cpulimit - A utility to limit cpu usage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041010.o04AAap6026479@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524006 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:10:35 EDT --- I asked the person from the original review request for cpulimit again if he/she is still interested to go on with it. Are you still in the mood to bring this package into the Fedora Package Collection? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:09:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:09:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041009.o04A98pv004835@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ashay.humane at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #34 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:09:04 EDT --- Ashay, is there any progress? There was another review request by Xia submitted #524006, if you have no time it would be an option to close this review and go with the one of Xia. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:12:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513779] Review Request: python-simplesettings - Simple settings initialization for Python libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041012.o04ACs2U005550@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513779 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:12:53 EDT --- The source was deleted at Google Code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:32:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041032.o04AWblR031142@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 05:32:36 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:35:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041035.o04AZrqf031784@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 05:35:53 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:36:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041036.o04Aaj7I009986@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:36:44 EDT --- The new spec and SRPM will come soon because 0.7.0 was released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:39:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041039.o04AduUn032573@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:39:54 EDT --- Bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsurl/+bug/502887 need to be solved first ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:37:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549590] Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041037.o04AbxmP032211@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pahan at hubbitus.in | |fo) | --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-04 05:37:57 EDT --- If it hosted on sourceforge it is case described in guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 10:58:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041058.o04AwbIN004577@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(claudio at claudioto | |masoni.it) | --- Comment #26 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 05:58:33 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=51848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:08:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527462] Review Request: python-gmpy - Python interface to GMP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041108.o04B8C4b017236@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527462 --- Comment #6 from Michael J Gruber 2010-01-04 06:08:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ping? Pong! I guess it took 2 months to recover from the shock mentioned in comment #4... I'll give it a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:26:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226523] Merge Review: vconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041126.o04BQ8W9011174@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226523 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jskala at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jskala at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:24:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041124.o04BOlsC021076@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2010-01-04 06:24:44 EDT --- Xavier, putting this on needinfo until you've got something for the highscore issue (just some bookkeeping so that this drops of my bugs needing attention list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:25:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041125.o04BPEgw021206@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(xavier at bachelot.o | |rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:31:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524992] Review Request: toppler - platform game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041131.o04BV2qM012393@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524992 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-01-04 06:31:01 EDT --- Sure, no pb. I didn't heard back from upstream on this issue (nor on the others 1.1.4 issues either) and I hadn't had time to hack anything myself. I'll ping them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:26:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041126.o04BQrIS011503@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede 2010-01-04 06:26:50 EDT --- Closing this, as this has been imported and build now (just some bookkeeping so that this drops of my bugs needing attention list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:33:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041133.o04BXh5n013248@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-01-04 06:33:40 EDT --- Thanks Rex! Sorry for delay - so what about F12? Do we really need it? F13 should be our target, for interested people it can be in kde repo for F12... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:35:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550690] Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041135.o04BZQ6B023701@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 06:35:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Jan 04 2010 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.1-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.7.1 to fix issue with make * Mon Jan 04 2010 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.0-1 - Added man pages - Updated to new upstream version 0.7.0 * Mon Dec 28 2009 Fabian Affolter - 0.6.0-1 - Updated to new upstream version 0.6.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:38:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041138.o04BcMEP014322@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2010-01-04 06:38:20 EDT --- ++ source files match upstream ++ package meets naming and versioning guidelines ++ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently ++ dist tag is present ++ build root is correct ++ license field matches the actual license ++ license is open source-compatible ++ latest version is being packaged ++ BuildRequires are proper -- compiler flags are appropriate erase --enable-yppasswd(it's not an option in configure) ++ %clean is present ++ package builds in mock ++ debuginfo package looks complete ++ final provides and requires look sane -- %check is present and all tests pass upstream don't provide any testcases ++ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths ??(not sure) owns the directories it creates ++ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't ++ no duplicates in %files ++ file permissions are appropriate ++ no scriptlets present -- %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package config files is taken from documentation ++ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary ++ no headers ++ no pkgconfig files ++ no libtool .la droppings ++ not a GUI app $ rpmlint i386/* ypserv.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided yppasswd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 11:49:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 06:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226450] Merge Review: sysreport In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041149.o04Bn5Zn016096@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226450 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Ngo Than 2010-01-04 06:49:03 EDT --- sysreport is now retired. fixed in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:03:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041203.o04C3bPX019630@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-04 07:03:33 EDT --- Legend: + - Ok. - - Error. +/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement. = - N/A. MUST Items [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint * 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Package have PEAR channel for installation: http://htmlpurifier.org/download#PEAR And must be registered in system PEAR database: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz_reviewed 88c6107a278aeb18757a1c99b03be59a htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz 88c6107a278aeb18757a1c99b03be59a htmlpurifier-4.0.0.tar.gz_reviewed [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900534 [=] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [-] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Package have many useful documentation and it should be included in %doc [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [=] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [=] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [=] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [=] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [=] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [=] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [=] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [=] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Summary of review: Please include documentation and properly register in system PEAR database and I'll approve package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:38:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041238.o04Cc8A3026959@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #9 from Till Maas 2010-01-04 07:38:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Please change > > %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.gz > > to > > %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.* > > because the compression of the manpages is applied automatically to the package > and we might switch to something different than gz. It might also not be compressed at all, therefore this is even better (the last "." is removed): %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:41:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551651] Review Request: ArpON - Arp handler inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041241.o04CfdfU006002@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551651 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #8 from Till Maas 2010-01-04 07:41:37 EDT --- There was an earlier review request submitted: bug #542991 please coordinate with the other submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:43:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544684] Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041243.o04ChHnO028183@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544684 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2010-01-04 07:43:16 EDT --- Fixed. The change is so small that I did not increase the release. Same links. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:42:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542991] Review Request: ArpON> - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041242.o04CgAtJ027941@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542991 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #1 from Till Maas 2010-01-04 07:42:09 EDT --- There was another review request submitted: bug #551651 please coordinate with the other submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:54:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:54:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041254.o04CsdlD030863@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 07:54:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcpreen Short Description: A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 12:53:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041253.o04Crqep009251@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 07:53:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review and a happy new year, Pavel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:06:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041306.o04D65mq012119@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 Jakub Hrozek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Jakub Hrozek 2010-01-04 08:05:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: boxes New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jhrozek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:10:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041310.o04DA9To013001@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-04 08:10:07 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/pino-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} FIX - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (GPLv3+) OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 005215400dcd00844558fbbe9b30fc46 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. FIX - MUST: consistently uses macros: %{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly validated with desktop-file-validate in the %install section. OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete OK - docs complete Issues: - The timestamp of Source0 still doesn't match SourceURL. Please use a download manager that preserves timestamps, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - Build is not verbose, please use "waf build -v" - You are not using parallel make, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - your macro usage is not consistent. You are using both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Please only use one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:15:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041315.o04DFRBe002893@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:17:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041317.o04DH7p9003307@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #11 from Liberty 2010-01-04 08:17:06 EDT --- I have tried link, it is working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:20:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041320.o04DK5Nn003997@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #12 from Liberty 2010-01-04 08:20:04 EDT --- I have uploaded SRPM here: http://ifile.it/j3ceih5/goldendict-0.9.0-3.20091226git7a03248.fc12.src.rpm and spec file: http://pastebin.com/m29f19a4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:23:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041323.o04DNvlR016941@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Drake 2010-01-04 08:23:56 EDT --- It's not quite that easy %doc has the side effect of wiping out the whole of /usr/share/doc/pkgname-ver so instead I'll just move the docs aside and install them all through %doc http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20100104/olpc-os-builder-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20100104/olpc-os-builder.spec Thanks for your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:48:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041348.o04DmLW5011868@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2010-01-04 08:48:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does it make sense to package the client without the server? Sure because the server is available for other distrbutions. > Or is it also on the way? The server will come but I don't want to specify a point in time. > A few other comments: > > - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only I missed that. Thanks will be fixed in the next update. > - Could you explain your strange release number? The numbering system that is used by upstream is indeed a bit strange. For me this looks like a Debian thing. I will get in touch with upstream. Maybe they drop some numbers of their release... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:51:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:51:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542991] Review Request: ArpON> - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041351.o04DpOQu025709@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542991 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG 2010-01-04 08:51:23 EDT --- Hello, I was trying to package Arpon for fedora security spin https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Spin . Please edit the wiki and add your name corresponding to Arpon there. Let me close my review request as duplicate of yours is that ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 13:56:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552253] New: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552253 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-MockObject-1.09-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/MergeReview/perl-Test-MockObject.spec Description: Test::MockObject is a highly polymorphic testing object, capable of looking like all sorts of objects. This makes white-box testing much easier, as you can concentrate on what the code being tested sends to and receives from the mocked object, instead of worrying about faking up your own data. (Another option is not to test difficult things. Now you have no excuse.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 14:24:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 09:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041424.o04EO0j0020186@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #33 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-01-04 09:23:55 EDT --- ReviewBoard built in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1900941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:05:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041505.o04F53OZ029128@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Alexander Kahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akahl at imttechnologies.com --- Comment #30 from Alexander Kahl 2010-01-04 10:04:58 EDT --- Hi, I've been following this review for some time now as I'm not aware of any existing self-executable CL-based packages in Fedora besides CL implementations themselves so this could well be the very first one; I would like to see things learned from the review in the wiki as I'm going to package CL stuff myself sometime in the future and I find the existing Lisp-related guidelines sparse; e.g. I'd conclude from what is written down right now that providing self-executable Lisp machines that are not the original implementations themselves is impossible, instead it looks like Lisp is treated like scripting languages in Fedora (which is - of course - utterly wrong) since the guidelines force use of cl- prefixes for both libs (OK) and programs (bad) and source code distribution only. I could be wrong here since the guidelines mentions "Libraries and Programs" in the headline but doesn't refer to the latter in the following body. Source: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp Would you mind starting a discussion about this in fedora-devel? I'd really like to see this resolved in an official manner and make Lisp-based projects first-level citizens in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:17:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041517.o04FHb9l008885@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 10:17:35 EDT --- Thanks, built successfully. Closing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:23:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041523.o04FNx0a010369@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 10:23:57 EDT --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:30:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041530.o04FUPgk012479@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 10:30:24 EDT --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:43:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041543.o04FhSRR016076@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #31 from David A. Wheeler 2010-01-04 10:43:27 EDT --- The second sentence of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp is: "This document does not describe conventions and customs for application programs that are written in Common Lisp." So that document doesn't apply. To my knowledge, there are *no* special written guidelines for packaging applications *written* in Common Lisp (CL). You just follow the usual conventions for packages (adding WHICH CL implementation you used in the package name). I know that "maxima" is another packaged application written in CL, so PVS isn't unique. It might be nice to have guidelines, but someone will have to figure out good guidelines first :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:52:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041552.o04FqTmQ006801@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #5 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 10:52:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > Why tabsize of 5? It just seems non-standard :) Don't suppose I could > > convince you to use 4 or 8 or to just use spaces? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize That's fine - it is your choice at this point. I was just curious. > > Do we really need that ugly looking thing above the %configure? This was a separate question. Why do we need to run all the autotools by hand? Does it still work if we remove them? Do we need to mess with CFLAGS? You updated the BuildRequires but not the Requires? You have some single %s in the changelog, 0.0.7-3, line 2, at the end. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 15:57:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 10:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041557.o04FvCe1007888@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik 2010-01-04 10:57:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polkit-kde Short Description: PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop Owners: jreznik rnovacek ltinkl than rdieter kkofler Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:05:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041605.o04G5dLK009468@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #7 from Tom?? B?atek 2010-01-04 11:05:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've added Conflicts: in libgnome-keyring.spec and explicit Requires: libgnome-keyring in gnome-keyring.spec for both gnome-keyring and gnome-keyring-devel subpackages (as discussed above). This should guarantee good upgrade path without breaking the things. New Spec: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring.spec New SRPM: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring-2.29.4-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:18:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041618.o04GI2F6007811@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #32 from Alexander Kahl 2010-01-04 11:18:01 EDT --- Hi David, (In reply to comment #31) > The second sentence of: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Lisp#Guidelines_for_Libraries_and_Programs_written_in_Common_Lisp > is: > "This document does not describe conventions and customs for application > programs that are written in Common Lisp." > So that document doesn't apply. Ooh I must have missed that - thanks for pointing that out! > To my knowledge, there are *no* special written guidelines for packaging > applications *written* in Common Lisp (CL). You just follow the usual > conventions for packages (adding WHICH CL implementation you used in the > package name). I know that "maxima" is another packaged application written in > CL, so PVS isn't unique. Didn't know 'bout that one, thanks again. > It might be nice to have guidelines, but someone will have to figure out good > guidelines first :-). The original ones seem to have been written by Spot, I wonder if he just took over those from Debian or whether he really knows about coding Lisps. Well the only "someones" in question is Fedorans who can code Lisp (or here CL in particular), right? So why not make something up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:20:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:20:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041620.o04GKV0g013340@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI 2010-01-04 11:20:29 EDT --- I think that this package should rather go to rpmfusion since it requires non free gstreamer plugins. it asks for faac plugin when adding anything to the file queue should we patch even more to skip that checking ? the choice is yours and btw, the faac plugin is broken in rpmfusion any thoughts ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:31:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041631.o04GVwpl016604@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #33 from Jerry James 2010-01-04 11:31:56 EDT --- I just started a thread to discuss the issues on fedora-devel, as requested. Let's discuss the issues there, where others can see the discussion, instead of hidden away in this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:45:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041645.o04GjUJo014755@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 11:45:28 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently, and this package no longer appears under the same name. The list of packages is: openvas-libraries 3.0.0 openvas-scanner 3.0.0 openvas-client 3.0.0 Optional: openvas-manager 0.9.8 openvas-administrator 0.4.0 gsa 0.8.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:51:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538299] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041651.o04GpXp8020791@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 11:51:32 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 16:51:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041651.o04GpDTp020682@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-04 11:51:12 EDT --- OpenVAS 3.0.0 released. Where did the openvas-plugins package go? See http://openvas.org/ : OpenVAS 3.0: openvas-libraries 3.0.0 openvas-scanner 3.0.0 openvas-client 3.0.0 Optional: openvas-manager 0.9.8 openvas-administrator 0.4.0 gsa 0.8.3 "The module openvas-server has been renamed to openvas-scanner and includes any platform-dependent elements of openvas-plugins." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:21:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041721.o04HL2Ln027941@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-04 12:21:00 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:34:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041734.o04HYMHG006318@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Ashay Humane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ashay.humane at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #35 from Ashay Humane 2010-01-04 12:34:20 EDT --- Please close this and go ahead with Xias review. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:45:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041745.o04HjAC5000587@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #18 from Eric Sandeen 2010-01-04 12:45:08 EDT --- Yep, sorry for not closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:43:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041743.o04HhVkO000378@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #15 from Leon Keijser 2010-01-04 12:43:29 EDT --- Thanks for the patch and your time spent so far. Yeah, christmas and newyear went by really fine, thanks. Hope you had a nice time as well :) I just started working again today and will pick up all of this as soon as time allows. Upstream released a new version as well, so i'll combine the two and report back here with a fresh srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:46:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:46:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041746.o04HkYxL000850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Carl Byington 2010-01-04 12:46:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mopac7 Short Description: Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 17:46:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041746.o04HkUmg000826@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #17 from Eric Sandeen 2010-01-04 12:46:28 EDT --- uuidd is clearly in util-linux-ng now: # rpm -qi uuidd Name : uuidd Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 2.17 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 0.1.git5e51568.fc13 Build Date: Mon 19 Oct 2009 07:56:41 AM CDT Install Date: Wed 28 Oct 2009 12:59:16 PM CDT Build Host: x86-5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : System Environment/Daemons Source RPM: util-linux-ng-2.17-0.1.git5e51568.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:02:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] New: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Summary: Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mgrac at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://marx.fedorapeople.org/piranha.spec SRPM URL: http://marx.fedorapeople.org/piranha-0.8.4-15.el5.src.rpm GIT URL: http://git.fedoraproject.org/git/piranha.git Description: Various tools to administer and configure the Linux Virtual Server as well as heartbeating and failover components. The LVS is a dynamically adjusted kernel routing mechanism that provides load balancing primarily for web and ftp servers though other services are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:04:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041804.o04I4A80005033@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 --- Comment #1 from Marek Grac 2010-01-04 13:04:09 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1901427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:06:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041806.o04I6YiR005475@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:06:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041806.o04I6F6P005392@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:29:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041829.o04ITCkk019231@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-04 13:29:11 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:46:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041846.o04IkLIw015309@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mail at marcus-moell | |er.ch) | --- Comment #25 from Marcus Moeller 2010-01-04 13:46:20 EDT --- Hi, sorry for the late reply. Going to push this week. I was in holiday the past few days. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:43:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:43:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041843.o04Ihcce014788@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-04 13:43:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Given the existence of the mx/mx-devel packages, a little more description in > the -devel packages might help I'm going to shortly improve all the descriptions. It looks like the gnome-shell people are going to be making use of this so I want to remove all mention of Moblin in the description as it looks like its going to be used in gnome-shell (this library will replace nbtk for Moblin 2.2) and gnome-shell pulls in a chunk of nbtk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:46:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041846.o04IkZeb023534@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-04 13:46:34 EDT --- > just had a quick look: > * I think that %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/mx needs to be tagged with %doc. I have been told that gtk-doc will automatically get tagged as docs due to the %{_datadir}/gtk-doc dir being tagged as %doc. > * Also please span the description to 80 columns as much as possible. Will update when I update the description > * Source0 seems wrong. In the rush I didn't update the URL. Will fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 18:56:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041856.o04Iugud025929@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-04 13:56:41 EDT --- One additional note, INSTALL says: "These optional extensions can enhance the capabilities of HTML Purifier: * iconv : Converts text to and from non-UTF-8 encodings * bcmath : Used for unit conversion and imagecrash protection * tidy : Used for pretty-printing HTML" I think add Requires php-bcmath and php-tidy is good idea to provide full power of package out of the box (until Fedora has not soft dependencies and install suggestions) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 19:15:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041915.o04JFGl2026091@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek 2010-01-04 14:15:15 EDT --- So: * first, please make rpmlint happy: >rpmlint piranha.spec piranha.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 80, tab: line 85) >rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/piranha-*.rpm piranha-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag piranha.x86_64: W: no-url-tag (add URL tag) piranha.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /etc/sysconfig/ha/modules /usr/lib64/httpd/modules This seems to be ok, the target is provided by httpd which is required, but see my comment at the very end. piranha.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/piranha 0775 Fix this please. piranha.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/sbin/piranha_gui /usr/sbin/httpd This is ok, as previously, though the "_gui" suffix isn't really motivating for being linked to apache. piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/log/piranha/piranha-gui piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/sysconfig/ha/lvs.cf Zero-length files shouldn't be packaged, either provide some default configuration (or at least explanation what users should use them for!) in them or remove them. piranha.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/piranha-httpd Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/. piranha.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/log/piranha/piranha-gui-access Likewise. piranha.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/sbin/piranha-passwd 0700 piranha.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/piranha-passwd 0700 The file doesn't seem to contain passwords => should be 755. piranha.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun userdel Users/groups must not be removed after package removal, refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups btw, you can also use getent to check whether a given user/group exists (see the examples on the above referenced page). Don't forget to remove shadow-utils from Requires(postun) as well. piranha.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/piranha-gui In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'reload' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript * please refer to Source and Patch policy here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment * use macros in the %files section (https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:RPMMacros) -- %{_sysconfdir}, %{_sbindir}, %{_initddir}, %{_initddir}, %{_localstatedir} * there is quite a mess what concerns licensing -- some source files (pulse.c, linkstate.c, nanny.c) refer to GPLv2+ (not just GPLv2), most refer to unspecified version of GPL (fos.c, lvsconfig.c, main.c, lvsd.c, util.c). Two files have quite problematic licensing: ipvs_exec.c contains just Copyright 1999 Red Hat Inc., and send_arp.c contains funny licensing which however could be troublesome (there were some cases that packages didn't pass review because you couldn't use them to prepare nuclear war or something like that). To sum up => Everywhere should be a licensed fully specified, I guess you wanted GPLv2+. Can you satisfy this condition for send_arp.c? If not, I'd ask spot what to do with this. * directory layout: the package misuses /etc/sysconfig heavily. The apache configuration files should placed under /etc/httpd/conf.d, "web" and "logs" should be moved to /usr/share. What's the purpose of the "modules" symlink? => There shouldn't be anything besides the "pulse" in /etc/sysconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 19:35:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041935.o04JZTtk032754@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #32 from Carl Byington 2010-01-04 14:35:27 EDT --- Ah, that seems to work. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-8.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1901500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 19:49:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: python-djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041949.o04Jnw1W010749@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Stephen Gallagher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-01-04 14:49:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-djblets New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sgallagh python-djblets is a required dependency for ReviewBoard, which is being considered for inclusion in the Fedora Hosted infrastructure. We need to branch this package to EL-5 for this support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 19:52:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001041952.o04Jq9UI003951@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Stephen Gallagher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Stephen Gallagher 2010-01-04 14:52:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ReviewBoard New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sgallagh ReviewBoard is being considered for inclusion in the Fedora Hosted infrastructure. We need to branch this package to EL-5 for this support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:09:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042009.o04K9hO6008332@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:09:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:10:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042010.o04KAT0Q008477@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:10:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:11:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042011.o04KBD50008615@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:11:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:07:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042007.o04K7YRD007954@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:07:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:14:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042014.o04KEVfK016951@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:14:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:13:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042013.o04KDJP2016714@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:13:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:16:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042016.o04KGQbM017441@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:16:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:18:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042018.o04KIme4017858@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:18:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:19:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042019.o04KJSf1010489@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:19:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:17:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042017.o04KHUbi010129@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:17:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:21:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042021.o04KL6MR018376@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:21:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:23:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042023.o04KNEnH018791@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:23:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:22:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:22:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042022.o04KMTeM018646@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:22:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:24:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042024.o04KOY8j011599@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:24:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:26:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042026.o04KQ89r011878@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:26:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:21:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042021.o04KLeTQ010978@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:21:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:26:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: python-djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042026.o04KQk2V012100@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-04 15:26:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:41:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532286] Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042041.o04KfUm7023607@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2010-01-04 15:41:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > treeline.x86_64: E: no-binary > > I think you should add this to your spec file to specify that your package is > not arch specific : > > BuildArch: noarch Erm.. But you have seen that there's a -libs subpackage? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:42:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042042.o04Kg3pk016413@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2010-01-04 15:42:02 EDT --- Updated. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-calendar/drupal-calendar-6.x.2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 20:48:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532286] Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042048.o04KmaXN025024@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 --- Comment #3 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-04 15:48:35 EDT --- My error, excuse me, I didn't see the *fc11* in your rpmlint command. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:13:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042113.o04LDd5C023852@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Sven Lankes 2010-01-04 16:13:37 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f12/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 07ef837f91179cd0f01c8ca86f1b459f58f1f1cf calendar-6.x-2.2.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f12/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:17:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042117.o04LHPZh024737@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #15 from Sven Lankes 2010-01-04 16:17:24 EDT --- Ups - wrong srpm - the the most recent spec you forgot to bump the release tag. Please fix before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:19:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042119.o04LJjAn025354@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 16:19:44 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update hunspell-mai'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:20:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042120.o04LKTsv025569@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 16:20:28 EDT --- mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-OpenSceneGraph'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:47:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042147.o04LlZjw032243@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-04 16:47:34 EDT --- Thank you. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:47:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042147.o04LlQZl032212@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-04 16:47:24 EDT --- Thank you. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:47:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042147.o04LlaB0032251@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Bug 546667 depends on bug 546666, which changed state. Bug 546666 Summary: Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:55:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542765] Review Request: libghemical - Libraries for the Ghemical chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042155.o04LtLAI001828@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542765 --- Comment #1 from Carl Byington 2010-01-04 16:55:20 EDT --- http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libghemical-2.99.1-10.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 21:59:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532286] Review Request: treeline - Store almost any kind of information in a tree structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042159.o04Lxaun003167@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532286 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-04 16:59:35 EDT --- > have seen that there's a -libs subpackage? Yes. The package contents are .noarch nevertheless. And it's broken currently: $ sudo rpm -i treeline-1.2.4-1.fc12.i686.rpm $ treeline /usr/bin/python: can't open file '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/treeline/treeline.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory What's the rationale for this strange -libs split-off? > Requires: PyQt4, python, qt, aspell https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires plus: "qt" is redundant, and treeline doesn't need it directly anyway plus: "python" is redundant, because the Python ABI dependency is automatic for the treeline module > BuildRequires: python, python-devel, desktop-file-utils, dos2unix > PyQt4, qt, aspell Same redundancy here. python-devel requires python, PyQt4 requires qt The fix for --short-circuit builds: --- treeline.spec.orig 2010-01-04 22:58:05.000000000 +0100 +++ treeline.spec 2010-01-04 22:58:26.000000000 +0100 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} python install.py -b %{buildroot} -mkdir __doc +rm -rf __doc ; mkdir __doc mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/* __doc rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 22:13:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042213.o04MDvAK006864@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-04 17:13:54 EDT --- pki-common & pki-util now build in rawhide. All dependencies should be satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 22:17:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042217.o04MH8nb014025@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-04 17:17:05 EDT --- pki-common & pki-util now build in rawhide. All dependencies should be satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 22:25:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042225.o04MP6TA008849@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #16 from John Dennis 2010-01-04 17:25:04 EDT --- re: comment #15, what do you mean built in rawhide? Did you mean to say a scratch build for rawhide? There shouldn't be any dogtag packages in rawhide because this review has not been closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 22:45:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042245.o04MjVt1019649@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-04 17:45:29 EDT --- John, I just wanted people looking at this to be aware of the fact that the dependencies (Build Requires) pki-common and pki-util had been built in rawhide so they shouldn't be a blocker for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:01:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:01:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042301.o04N1uAY015552@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #92 from Michal Nowak 2010-01-04 18:01:48 EDT --- 3.4.3 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:09:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042309.o04N9U21016756@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #18 from John Dennis 2010-01-04 18:09:28 EDT --- can pki-common and pki-util ever be used without dogtag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:16:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042316.o04NGRTg018584@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2010-01-04 18:16:26 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1902087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:21:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042321.o04NLhBb025395@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 18:21:42 EDT --- pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:21:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042321.o04NLctw025375@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 18:21:37 EDT --- pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:42:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042342.o04Ng9RJ028922@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-04 18:42:08 EDT --- Updated. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx-0.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 4 23:42:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001042342.o04NgkaX022439@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libmx - A |Review Request: libmx - A |clutter toolkit for Moblin |clutter widget toolkit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 00:55:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 19:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050055.o050t7RK002036@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Felix M?ller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at derklecks.de --- Comment #20 from Felix M?ller 2010-01-04 19:55:06 EDT --- just rebuilt the package without a problem on F12. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 01:02:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050102.o0512CoS009742@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Felix M?ller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at derklecks.de --- Comment #14 from Felix M?ller 2010-01-04 20:02:09 EDT --- I had to do a: === modified file 'emerillon.spec' --- emerillon.spec 2010-01-05 00:59:09 +0000 +++ emerillon.spec 2010-01-05 00:59:27 +0000 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ %patch1 -p1 -b .fixdesktop # Copy in license from upstream git -cp %{SOURCE1} %{builddir}/%{name}-%{version} +cp %{SOURCE1} . # Needed due to patch for rest detection libtoolize otherwise I got a: + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .fixdesktop --fuzz=0 + cp /home/fm/rpmbuild/SOURCES/COPYING.LGPL '%{builddir}/emerillon-0.1.0' cp: cannot create regular file `%{builddir}/emerillon-0.1.0': No such file or directory Fehler: Fehler-Status beim Beenden von /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.oxoId7 (%prep) [fm at thinkpad ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/rpm/macros rpm-4.7.2-1.fc12.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 02:27:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050227.o052RL7n019695@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Bug 544630 depends on bug 544628, which changed state. Bug 544628 Summary: at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 02:27:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050227.o052RKQo019687@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Bug 544629 depends on bug 544628, which changed state. Bug 544628 Summary: at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 02:27:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050227.o052RJXM019677@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-04 21:27:17 EDT --- Build done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 02:33:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050233.o052XOKU027039@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2010-01-04 21:33:22 EDT --- Yes i know that, I am going to import openvas-libraries 3.0.0 soon and will rebuild other packages once that is done. (In reply to comment #2) > OpenVAS 3.0.0 was released recently, and this package no longer appears under > the same name. > > The list of packages is: > openvas-libraries 3.0.0 > openvas-scanner 3.0.0 > openvas-client 3.0.0 > Optional: > openvas-manager 0.9.8 > openvas-administrator 0.4.0 > gsa 0.8.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 03:24:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050324.o053O4Mi029816@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-04 22:24:01 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.el5.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osutil-1.3.1-1.el5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 05:51:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050551.o055pYeC002039@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dchen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-01-05 00:51:32 EDT --- I've tested this package. It seems working with totem, and built sucessfully in koji for F-12, F-11 and rawhide. However, just one concern: Indeed most of plugins have prefix gstreamer-plugin'S' and includes a few plugins. This package on the other hand, only contain sone plugin, you may just use the upstream name: gstreamer-plugin-fc. Well, this is up to your justification. What say you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 05:52:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050552.o055qs4w027923@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(oget.fedora at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-05 00:52:52 EDT --- Would you rebuild this package also on F-11/12 (as you requested to add these branches) and submit push requests on bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:24:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520540] Review Request: ibus-table-viqr - Viqr table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050624.o056Og2R001616@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520540 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:24:41 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:24:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520741] Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050624.o056Othl001657@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520741 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:24:54 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:24:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520367] Review Request: ibus-table-ziranma - ZiRanMa table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050624.o056OWcu001568@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520367 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:24:31 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:23:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520048] Review Request: ibus-table-stroke5 - Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050623.o056N1XE001316@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520048 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:23:00 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:23:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518903] Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050623.o056NbKV001417@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518903 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:23:36 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:22:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520015] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050622.o056MD3F001153@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520015 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:22:11 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:24:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520048] Review Request: ibus-table-stroke5 - Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050624.o056OArF008575@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520048 --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:24:10 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:27:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520366] Review Request: ibus-table-wu - Wu table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050627.o056R0d1002085@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520366 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:26:59 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:26:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518910] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050626.o056QhcP002001@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518910 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cchance at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:26:42 EDT --- revert, need to reorganize new packaging strategies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:41:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050641.o056fEvn011967@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 --- Comment #7 from Parag 2010-01-05 01:41:13 EDT --- please wait till Friday as I am checking if this package can be retired from Fedora as stardict looks providing same functionality and pydict code is having old function calls which are deprecated now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 06:52:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 01:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523034] Review Request: python-setuptools_trial - Setuptools plugin that makes unit tests execute with trial instead of pyunit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050652.o056qX7o013727@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523034 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 01:52:31 EDT --- Hi, I'm here for prereview: ===== $ rpmlint python-setuptools_trial.spec python-setuptools_trial.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 17) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. CC> Please use either tabs or spaces. ===== As per declaration on .spec file, a copy of BSD license is needed to be included. Please add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:11:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050711.o057BCOs009908@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Josephine Tannh?user changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) --- Comment #15 from Josephine Tannh?user 2010-01-05 02:11:10 EDT --- Simon ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:10:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520568] Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050710.o057Agwr016538@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #3 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 02:10:41 EDT --- You need full URL of upstream for the source file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:11:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050711.o057B8Mk016605@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Josephine Tannh?user changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) --- Comment #21 from Josephine Tannh?user 2010-01-05 02:11:07 EDT --- Simon ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:07:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:07:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505360] Review Request: JSCookMenu - Javascript GUI-like web menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050707.o0577n59016144@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 02:07:48 EDT --- Hi I'm here for prereview: ===== $ rpmlint SPECS/JSCookMenu.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ===== Please either include license file and mention in every source file, or include license contents in every source file. Also, please persuade author to adopt MIT license rather than MIT-compatible license for legal concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:21:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521707] Review Request: python-zc.buildout - System for managing Python development buildouts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050721.o057Ldmt011288@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521707 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #3 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-05 02:21:38 EDT --- Hi, I'm here for pre-review: ===== $ rpmlint python-zc.buildout.spec python-zc.buildout.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 9) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please use either spaces or tabs. ===== You could use macros on 'rm'. You should put 'ZPLv2.1' at license field. Where is the ZPL license in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:49:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050749.o057npZF015704@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 07:49:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 02:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538363] Review Request: perl-pip - Perl Installation Program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050749.o057nqMI015714@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538363 Bug 538363 depends on bug 538360, which changed state. Bug 538360 Summary: Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:09:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050809.o0589uRp026108@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-05 03:09:54 EDT --- You still have to fix the rpath issue. Use the same method as in mopac7. $ rpmlint mpqc-* mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/molrender ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mpqc ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/scls ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/scpr ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc-data.noarch: W: no-documentation mpqc-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/sc-config lines ['30'] mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmolecule.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmpqc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCclass.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmisc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCsymmetry.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCkeyval.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCbasis.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCintv3.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCrender.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:13:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050813.o058DTQJ026784@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-05 03:13:28 EDT --- What's more, Fedora optimization flags aren't used in the build. You might want to ask upstream to fix this - the flags should be picked up by configure from the environment variables set by the %configure macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:43:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050843.o058hTRI024571@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-05 03:43:27 EDT --- Suggest http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/statusnet.spec (with http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/statusnet-0.8.2-2.fc12.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:56:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050856.o058ugAM026692@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:56:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050856.o058uiQt026727@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 Bug 225778 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 08:56:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 03:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050856.o058umfP026751@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 Bug 248363 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 09:49:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 04:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050949.o059n99g004516@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 --- Comment #2 from Martin Stransky 2010-01-05 04:49:08 EDT --- Thanks for the comments! (In reply to comment #1) > Just a few comments for now: > - Why do you use add_files and not the normal %files section? Because the file list is dynamically generated from pkg-config and depends on recently installed xulrunner package. > - Why do you install in a own created directory and don't use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is used...see add_files() macro. the %{builddir} is only a shortcut. > - nspr_version is not existent. Is it even needed? Ahh, good point, nspr_version has to be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 09:48:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 04:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001050948.o059mO2f010993@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #27 from Laurent Rineau 2010-01-05 04:48:20 EDT --- (Same as comment #12) Why has this bug been closed? As far as I know, the review process is stalled and not complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 10:07:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520568] Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051007.o05A7GkP014726@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2010-01-05 05:07:15 EDT --- Giving up. If anybody wants it, take it. Closing as WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 10:26:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051026.o05AQuDY018483@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |npajkovs at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2010-01-05 05:26:54 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 10:37:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051037.o05AbWep014281@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-05 05:37:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) At least we are talking about the subject. > This was a separate question. Why do we need to run all the autotools by hand? > Does it still work if we remove them? Do we need to mess with CFLAGS? Thanks, I remove all this stuff. > You updated the BuildRequires but not the Requires? Thanks, fixed. > You have some single %s in the changelog, 0.0.7-3, line 2, at the end. Sorry, I don't understand about what "%s" you are speak. I search and in spec "%s" is not found at all. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket-0.0.10-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 10:41:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051041.o05AfiIm015206@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-05 05:41:41 EDT --- *** Bug 551292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 10:59:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 05:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051059.o05Axhvr019880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 --- Comment #2 from Karel Kl?? 2010-01-05 05:59:42 EDT --- > -- compiler flags are appropriate > erase --enable-yppasswd(it's not an option in configure) Fixed. > -- %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package > config files is taken from documentation I think this is ok. The package copies configuration files from upstream to documentation by marking them as %doc. These files are not used by ypserv. > ypserv.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided yppasswd > ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd > ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd > ypserv.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv > ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/yppasswdd > ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypxfrd > ypserv.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ypserv I think these warnings and errors may be omitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 11:03:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051103.o05B3pGn020726@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 11:04:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051104.o05B4QjY020811@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Tom?? B?atek 2010-01-05 06:04:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgnome-keyring Short Description: Framework for managing passwords and other secrets Owners: tbzatek Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 11:07:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051107.o05B7HkS021403@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 11:15:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051115.o05BFpEe030188@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-05 06:15:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > How about this: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec > > * Mon Dec 28 2009 Orion Poplawski 2.0-1 > - Update to 2.0 > - Use upstream jar source directly > - Cleanup spec Orion, do you want to step in as the submitter/maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 12:00:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520568] Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051200.o05C0QH5007375@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 12:34:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051234.o05CYPWZ014377@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-05 07:34:23 EDT --- Imported and built without shame or guilt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 12:50:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528333] Review Request: gnunet-gtk - GNUnet GTK+ User Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051250.o05CoxAK011308@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528333 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2010-01-05 07:50:58 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Could you please update this to 0.8.1? I will then start the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:03:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051303.o05D3cUx014390@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Felix Kaechele 2010-01-05 08:03:34 EDT --- [+] source files match upstream: sha256sum add18b68710a08dd1d209f177154f9d8c7614031050abf16139dd9c3fc56be84 tinc-1.0.11.tar.gz add18b68710a08dd1d209f177154f9d8c7614031050abf16139dd9c3fc56be84 ../SOURCES/tinc-1.0.11.tar.gz [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in mock. [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [NA] %check is present and all tests pass: [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [NA] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. [N/A] desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:13:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051313.o05DDdvQ016467@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2010-01-05 08:13:38 EDT --- A few questions: - Why don't you remove the .git directory prior to tarring? That would make the source smaller. - Release number seems wrong. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease it should be 0.1.%{date} - Although the Group tag is somewhat obsolete, for me Development/Tools sounds like a better choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:27:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:27:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051327.o05DR4FO019136@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebastian at when.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-01-05 08:27:03 EDT --- I'm going to take a look at this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:40:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051340.o05Depjr022113@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-05 08:40:50 EDT --- Done. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cnucnu.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/cnucnu-0-0.2.20100105.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:39:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051339.o05DdKK0021803@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2010-01-05 08:39:18 EDT --- Will do, thanks, and thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drupal-calendar Short Description: This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats Owners: limb Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:38:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051338.o05DcO6p028503@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-01-05 08:38:21 EDT --- [ OK ] specfiles match: 5b84e5e23a3ed18216bb0c4e8d8961db [ OK ] source files match upstream: 916694e534ae745d3a809c4634b6696f [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ OK ] package builds in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1902982 [ OK ] package installs properly. [ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent: libmx-devel.i686: W: no-documentation [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane [ NA ] %check is present and all tests pass [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ NA ] owns the directories it creates. [ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ NA ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] code, not content. [ OK ] docs subpackage is appropriately created [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] headers go into devel package. [ OK ] pkgconfig files are in devel package. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ NA ] desktop files valid and installed properly. Looks like you're good to go here. The rpmlint warning is a non-issue, since the devel package pulls the main package in anyway. So this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 13:53:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051353.o05DrsXu024640@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-05 08:53:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmx Short Description: A clutter widget toolkit Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:00:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051400.o05E0as7001260@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2010-01-05 09:00:35 EDT --- Btw. gitweb also provides a URL to a tgz archive, e.g.: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=till/public_git/cnucnu.git;a=commit;h=2db83a6c2ad1685a3d44caf435e702c5991732d1 or http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=till/public_git/cnucnu.git;a=snapshot;sf=tgz And ./setup.py sdist will also create a tarball directly from the checkout. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:14:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051414.o05EEUCP004384@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-05 09:14:28 EDT --- + rpmlint (buildroot tag is no longer required, as long as this isn't going into epel 5) $ rpmlint at-spi2-atk.spec at-spi2-atk.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name is fine + spec is %{name}.spec + meets packaging guidelines + meets licensing guidelines + license matches (the GNU Library GPL is the precursor to the Lesser GPL) + COPYING is in %doc + spec is in American English + spec is legible + sources match ? build (I can't convince my mock to get the repodata from a mirror that has at-spi2-core in it... but I'm assuming this builds fine) + no ExcludeArch + build deps listed + no locales + no shared libraries in default paths + doesn't bundle a copy of a system library + not relocatable + directories appear sane + %files doesn't contain duplicates + %files has %defattr + %clean is correct + spec macros used consistently + package contains code + no large docs + %doc files are not required to run + no header files + no static libraries + no pkgconfig files + .so does not have trailing numbers + no -devel package + no .la files (removed in %install phase) + no gui applications + no duplicate file/dir ownership + %install clears buildroot + filenames are valid utf-8 so long as it builds for you in mock/koji, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:24:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552554] New: Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552554 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Convert-BinHex/1.119/11.fc13/src/perl-Convert-BinHex-1.119-11.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1735810&filename=perl-Convert-BinHex.spec Description: Convert::BinHex extracts data from Macintosh BinHex files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:28:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552557] New: Merge Review: perl-Config-Tiny - Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Config-Tiny - Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552557 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Config-Tiny - Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Config-Tiny/2.12/7.fc12/src/perl-Config-Tiny-2.12-7.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1422538&filename=perl-Config-Tiny.spec Description: Config::Tiny is a Perl module designed for reading and writing .ini style configuration files. It is designed for simplicity and ease of use, and thus only supports the most basic operations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:38:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552564] New: Merge Review: perl-IO-stringy - I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-stringy - I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564 Summary: Merge Review: perl-IO-stringy - I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-IO-stringy/2.110/11.fc13/src/perl-IO-stringy-2.110-11.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1735817&filename=perl-IO-stringy.spec Description: This toolkit primarily provides Perl modules for performing both traditional and object-oriented I/O) on things *other* than normal filehandles; in particular, IO::Scalar, IO::ScalarArray, and IO::Lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:44:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552568] New: Merge Review: perl-Test-Exception - Library of test functions for exception based Perl code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Exception - Library of test functions for exception based Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552568 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Test-Exception - Library of test functions for exception based Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Test-Exception/0.27/4.fc12/src/perl-Test-Exception-0.27-4.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1426327&filename=perl-Test-Exception.spec Description: This module provides a few convenience methods for testing exception based code. It is built with Test::Builder and plays happily with Test::More and friends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:47:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051447.o05ElVdh005618@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #11 from Michal Babej 2010-01-05 09:47:28 EDT --- OK, i did some changes: - update to 2.2.16 - got rid of test_files macro in %check (replaced it with solution from comment #3) - replaced test_files in %install with commands from Jeroen van Meeuwen's specfile for rubygem-haml (bug 551565) http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml.spec http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml-2.2.16-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:49:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051449.o05EnBX1005931@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-05 09:49:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: at-spi2-atk Short Description: A GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:51:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226497] Merge Review: tog-pegasus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051451.o05EpxjO006836@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226497 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:53:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226497] Merge Review: tog-pegasus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051453.o05Er7Hp014316@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226497 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 14:59:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051459.o05ExWkU015670@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Andy Shevchenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andy.shevchenko at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Andy Shevchenko 2010-01-05 09:59:30 EDT --- Any interest here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 15:07:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] New: Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 Summary: Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at matbooth.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Should be an easy one, this: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/xml-stylebook.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/xml-stylebook-1.0-0.2.b3_xalan2.svn313293.fc12.noarch.rpm Description: Apache XML Stylebook is a HTML documentation generator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 15:17:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051517.o05FHAod020072@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-05 10:17:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Orion, do you want to step in as the submitter/maintainer? I'm happy to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 15:21:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051521.o05FLF0h021121@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #10 from Alagunambi Welkin 2010-01-05 10:21:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Thanks for your comment New SPEC and SRPM can be found here, SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/webattery/webattery-spec-1.1-5 SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/webattery/webattery-1.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 15:31:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051531.o05FVIBP016282@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-05 10:31:16 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK successful koji compilation. OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 16:49:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051649.o05Gn3RG001673@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #13 from Tomas Smetana 2010-01-05 11:49:01 EDT --- Hello, I have committed a new spec to the devel branch that should include the proposed changes. It also drops the font related patch since the OSD looks terribly ugly with that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 16:50:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513497] Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051650.o05GoY9S008904@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 Mohammed Morsi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(mmorsi at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Mohammed Morsi 2010-01-05 11:50:33 EDT --- Sorry for the belated followup. Priorities shifted and didn't/don't have time to work on this, thus am closing. If anyone wants to resume work on the viewer itself or packaging it for Fedora, feel free to ping me w/ any questions you may have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 16:52:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] New: Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 Summary: Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview-1.2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Common UNIX Printing System uses an intermediate format called raster for inkjet printers and others that require rasterized input. This program can be used to view this intermediate format and is mainly used for debugging printer drivers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 17:08:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051708.o05H8Fmm005911@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nushio at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nushio at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 17:10:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551857] Review Request: fwsnort - Translates Snort rules into equivalent iptables rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051710.o05HAVYv013883@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551857 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 17:32:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051732.o05HWL3G011002@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-05 12:32:20 EDT --- Thanks, so as the packaging itself is okay (and the test you provided works), I can approve this one. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-merb-core) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 17:47:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 12:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051747.o05Hl7cX014159@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-05 12:47:06 EDT --- Well, I have not looked into the newest srpm yet, however at least scratch build fails on rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1903695 Note that rawhide uses rubygem-rack-1.1.0-1.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 18:16:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:16:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051816.o05IGZ5W019857@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 13:16:33 EDT --- pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.el5.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.el5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 18:24:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051824.o05IOZ8i022141@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 344681, which changed state. Bug 344681 Summary: Please add this packae to EL-5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344681 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 18:26:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051826.o05IQfit022509@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 13:26:38 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-common-1.3.0-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 19:00:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051900.o05J0np0030659@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #19 from Matthew Harmsen 2010-01-05 14:00:47 EDT --- re: comment #18: Currently, Dogtag consists of six distinct servers: * pki-ca (Java/Tomcat) * pki-kra (Java/Tomcat) * pki-ocsp (Java/Tomcat) * pki-ra (Perl/Apache) * pki-tks (Java/Tomcat) * pki-tps (C/C++/Apache) and some associated tools and management: * pki-native-tools (C/C++) * pki-java-tools (Java) * pki-console (Java) The 'pki-util' package contains application specific jar files required by: * pki-ca * pki-kra * pki-ocsp * pki-tks * pki-java-tools * pki-console The 'pki-common' package contains application specific jar files required by: * pki-ca * pki-kra * pki-ocsp * pki-tks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 19:07:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051907.o05J7WFu001126@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #20 from Matthew Harmsen 2010-01-05 14:07:30 EDT --- Details about the 'pki-util' package are documented in: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Details about the 'pki-common' package are documented in: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 19:24:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:24:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051924.o05JOuuD015690@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #35 from Carl Byington 2010-01-05 14:24:54 EDT --- fixed. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-9.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1903846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 19:51:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 14:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521152] Review Request: mysql-workbench - MySQL gui tool for database modelling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001051951.o05JpkGj014471@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521152 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-05 14:51:45 EDT --- May better be pack development release 5.2.11 beta? And concerning Source URL: yiu in comment already point on one mirror, not on base balancing system. In this case we can choose one mirror and provide direct URL on it like: ftp://gd.tuwien.ac.at/db/mysql/Downloads/MySQLGUITools/mysql-workbench-oss-5.2.11.tar.gz It will be understand by rpm and other spec tools. Also, please, update full description to something more detailed. Also you use some magic in strip some dependency and change compile flags, can you slightly describe why? Bug links may be? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 20:47:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052047.o05Kl7wp028674@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-05 15:47:06 EDT --- You might want change: %defattr(-,root,root) -> %defattr(-,root,root,-) update mime db might be needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database Had to apply this patch to make it build: --- /SPECS/rasterview.spec~ 2009-12-14 13:23:01.000000000 +0100 +++ /SPECS/rasterview.spec 2010-01-05 21:42:44.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ make BUILDROOT=%{buildroot} install rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/X11/applnk +rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applnk/Development/rasterview.desktop desktop-file-install \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category System \ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 20:59:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052059.o05KxB7k031910@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-05 15:59:10 EDT --- The buildreq list list too short, at least add cups-devel, libpng-devel, libjpeg-devel and zlib-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 21:01:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:01:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052101.o05L1HgH004808@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-05 16:01:17 EDT --- That did the trick, koji built it fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1904107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 21:35:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052135.o05LZeru012288@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2010-01-05 16:35:38 EDT --- imported, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:09:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052209.o05M9kE4014850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #3 from James Laska 2010-01-05 17:09:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=381859) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381859) rpmfluff.patch The attached patch addresses several small issues during review, including: * rpmlint typo in %description * incorrect permissions on rpmfluff.py * Adding a %Requires on python * Removing file header from rpmfluff.py to correct rpmlint error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:22:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052222.o05MM6Cs017304@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #4 from James Laska 2010-01-05 17:22:05 EDT --- I've reviewed the package according to the review guidelines (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines). Results are posted below. Please address the outstanding issues noted by "NOT OK". # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in # the review.[1] OK (see attached patch) $ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-2.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-2.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-rpmfluff.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format # %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet # the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual # license. [3] OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) # in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for # the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, # as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no # upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL # Guidelines for how to deal with this. NOT OK $ curl https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 | md5sum b349770877d43d9fd71d53ece24a4165 $ rpm -ivh https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1:python-rpmfluff ########################################### [100%] $ md5sum /tmp/jlaska-rpm/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 db40cf13beb5241835d9256a90e998be /tmp/jlaska-rpm/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at # least one primary architecture. [7] OK (tested on x86_64) # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an # architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in # ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in # bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work # on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the # corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] N/A # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any # that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; # inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK If you wish to change to using python distutils, you may wish to add BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the # %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library # files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must # call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state # this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for # relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is # considered a blocker. [12] N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not # create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does # create that directory. [13] OK - with included patch # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's # %files listings. [14] OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set # with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a # %defattr(...) line. [15] OK - with included patch to change 0644 for rpmfluff.py # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf # %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition # of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted # to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] N/A # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime # of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run # properly if it is not present. [19] OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), # then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel # package. [20] N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base # package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = # %{version}-%{release} [23] N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be # removed in the spec if they are built.[21] N/A # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop # file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in # the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not # need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your # explanation. [24] N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other # packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed # should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This # means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership # with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. # If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that # another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] N/A # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} # (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] OK # SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate # file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [28] OK # SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should # contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [29] # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [30] OK (using koji scratch build) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1904152 # SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all # supported architectures. [31] OK (noarch) # SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A # package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK (tested using rpmguard) # SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, # and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [32] N/A # SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package # using a fully versioned dependency. [23] N/A # SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and # this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel # pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not # installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [22] N/A # SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, # /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file # instead of the file itself. [33] OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:29:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052229.o05MTKM2019237@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:29:17 EDT --- log4c-1.2.1-7.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:31:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052231.o05MVUvN024342@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:31:30 EDT --- log4c-1.2.1-7.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:31:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052231.o05MViXV024395@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:31:42 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update osutil'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2010-0024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:30:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052230.o05MUQYK024124@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:30:25 EDT --- pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.el5.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-java-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2010-0009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:31:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052231.o05MVo0u019856@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:31:48 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-common'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2010-0025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:46:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052246.o05MkEYo022516@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:46:12 EDT --- liboglappth-0.98-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liboglappth'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:46:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052246.o05MkJUm027316@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:46:18 EDT --- mopac7-1.15-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mopac7'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0173 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:55:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052255.o05MtdhN025831@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:55:38 EDT --- mopac7-1.15-8.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mopac7'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0200 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 22:52:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 17:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052252.o05MqrNQ029994@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-05 17:52:52 EDT --- liboglappth-0.98-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update liboglappth'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 5 23:31:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001052331.o05NV914001667@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 zhihengz at hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zhihengz at hotmail.com --- Comment #97 from zhihengz at hotmail.com 2010-01-05 18:30:57 EDT --- all gstreamer libs under lib/ are fault, you need delete all of them to make songbird 1.4.3 to start up, not sure what functions you lost, most likely it will find system gstreamer libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 02:12:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060212.o062CVKi030423@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Luke Macken 2010-01-05 21:12:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: orbited Short Description: A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge Owners: lmacken Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 02:40:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060240.o062eGfm002720@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #15 from Luke Macken 2010-01-05 21:40:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > A quick rpmlint gives: > $ rpmlint orbited-0.7.10-2.fc11.src.rpm > orbited.src: W: strange-permission orbited.init 0775 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'll fix that before I commit it to CVS, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:01:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060601.o0661cQB009355@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2010-01-06 01:01:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1904568 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) fdd1de26d16f47ad9d3b2593eb9564ed10562c34 pki-silent-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:05:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060605.o0665Snc010347@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dennis at ausil.us |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(????) 2010-01-06 01:05:26 EDT --- I hope Dennis will not mind If I will review this officially. also, I am unable to download SRPM for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:06:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552253] Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060606.o0666tff012580@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552253 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:13:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552564] Merge Review: perl-IO-stringy - I/O on in-core objects like strings and arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060613.o066DZ4d012247@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:13:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552568] Merge Review: perl-Test-Exception - Library of test functions for exception based Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060613.o066Dgtf012271@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552568 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:13:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552557] Merge Review: perl-Config-Tiny - Perl module for reading and writing .ini style configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060613.o066DsAR012327@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552557 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:27:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060627.o066RFc0015156@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-06 01:27:12 EDT --- updated srpm & spec file: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca-1.3.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:33:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060633.o066X2YN016618@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-06 01:33:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-silent Short Description: The Dogtag Silent Installer Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:43:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060643.o066hrSH019150@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |532190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 06:43:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 01:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060643.o066hrnv019158@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502358(mojomojo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 09:01:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060901.o06911Gm013294@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|perl-Tie-IxHash |Package Review AssignedTo|tcallawa at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 08:59:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 03:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060859.o068xRHd012998@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|perltidy |Package Review AssignedTo|ville.skytta at iki.fi |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 09:05:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552826] New: Merge Review: perl-Tree-DAG_Node - Class for representing nodes in a tree Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Tree-DAG_Node - Class for representing nodes in a tree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552826 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Tree-DAG_Node - Class for representing nodes in a tree Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Tree-DAG_Node/1.06/6.fc12/src/perl-Tree-DAG_Node-1.06-6.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1426659&filename=perl-Tree-DAG_Node.spec Description: This class encapsulates/makes/manipulates objects that represent nodes in a tree structure. The tree structure is not an object itself, but is emergent from the linkages you create between nodes. This class provides the methods for making linkages that can be used to build up a tree, while preventing you from ever making any kinds of linkages which are not allowed in a tree (such as having a node be its own mother or ancestor, or having a node have two mothers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 09:32:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060932.o069WGJK019628@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-06 04:32:11 EDT --- Mat, Please upload a src.rpm for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 09:37:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552831] New: Merge Review: perl-Date-Manip - A Perl module containing a wide variety of date manipulation routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Manip - A Perl module containing a wide variety of date manipulation routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552831 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Date-Manip - A Perl module containing a wide variety of date manipulation routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Date-Manip/5.54/4.fc13/src/perl-Date-Manip-5.54-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1714550&filename=perl-Date-Manip.spec Description: This is a set of routines designed to make any common date/time manipulation easy to do. Operations such as comparing two times, calculating a time a given amount of time from another, or parsing international times are all easily done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 09:42:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 04:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001060942.o069gxMC021880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-06 04:42:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for your comment about the summary, I'll update immediately my .spec > file. > > About the name of the package, I followed the "implicit" convention in Fedora > to prefix packages names of Java components from Apache Commons > (http://commons.apache.org/) with "jakarta-commons-". It seems to be a legacy > of JPackage. > For example, Apache Commons projects like CLI or Codec are available in the > repos as jakarta-commons-cli and jakarta-commons-codec. And we have to change that. Please make it apache-commons-math. New packages should to The Right Thing TM instead of following legacy practices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:12:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:12:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061012.o06ACEqb013943@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 --- Comment #5 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-06 05:12:13 EDT --- I changed the name of the package to "apache-commons-math" as suggested. The subject of the thread was updated therefore. Here are the new .spec file and SRPM: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/apache-commons-math/apache-commons-math.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/apache-commons-math/apache-commons-math-2.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:10:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061010.o06AARSV013636@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |jakarta-commons-math - The |apache-commons-math - Java |Apache Commons Mathematics |library of lightweight |Library |mathematics and statistics | |components -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:21:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061021.o06ALSSQ015457@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(jchadima at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Jan F. Chadima 2010-01-06 05:21:25 EDT --- All requested actios done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:37:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061037.o06AbTL0018843@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #15 from Michal Nowak 2010-01-06 05:37:26 EDT --- Will get back to this, when I find more time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:44:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061044.o06AisUe002240@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #79 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-06 05:44:43 EDT --- Can you build this for EPEL 5? I'd need it to update Octave to the 3.2 series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 10:54:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 05:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061054.o06Aso2U022543@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-06 05:54:49 EDT --- The hicolor-icon-theme issue is still there: you need it full time for dir ownership, not just in %post and %postun. Otherwise looks fine, APPROVED Please fix the hicolor-icon-theme issue before shipping updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:13:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061113.o06BDhFv025844@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #36 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-06 06:13:39 EDT --- mpqc-data.noarch: W: no-documentation mpqc-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/sc-config lines ['30'] mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmolecule.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmpqc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCclass.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmisc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCsymmetry.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCkeyval.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCbasis.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCintv3.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCrender.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. You still have the rpath.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:17:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061117.o06BHsQU026473@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Ville Skytt? 2010-01-06 06:17:53 EDT --- Hm, what's this about, a merge review with what? We do have perltidy in Fedora and have had it for a long time, I maintain it, and the SRPM and spec links in the initial comment point to the 2nd latest Fedora perltidy build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:35:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061135.o06BZMfi012686@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-06 06:35:21 EDT --- Sadly for import to next RHEL, we need formal review ticket for every package. I didn't find any for this, because it was done probably long time ago without ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:41:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:41:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061141.o06Bf35j031397@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #15 from Tomas Smetana 2010-01-06 06:41:02 EDT --- Thanks a lot for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:42:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552855] New: Merge Review: anthy - Japanese character set input library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: anthy - Japanese character set input library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552855 Summary: Merge Review: anthy - Japanese character set input library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- I'm not quite sure why we've missed the merge review for anthy but apparently it wasn't done. so I'm requesting to ensure making it better. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/anthy/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:47:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:47:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226106] Merge Review: lrzsz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061147.o06Blraw014948@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226106 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:55:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061155.o06BtJIp016333@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-06 06:55:17 EDT --- Ok, then lets continue. All issues from comment #2 besides one are fixed in the latest spec file. What remains is non-existency of non-versioned directory with the javadoc documentation as written in the guidelines for Java packages. Adding a non-versioned symlink is also possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 11:54:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 06:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061154.o06BscIo001306@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 --- Comment #4 from Tim Waugh 2010-01-06 06:54:36 EDT --- Thanks! New files: Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview-1.2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:09:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061209.o06C9Gfn004681@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Triaged AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:21:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061221.o06CL9Do006873@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-06 07:21:07 EDT --- MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - I can't find any file that is licensed only under GPLv2. - I think the license should be just "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+". MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add COPYING.LIB to %doc. - Some files in the library are under GPLv2+, so both COPYING and COPYING.LIB have to be in the package. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK - There's a *lot* of stuff in the includedir, for instance /usr/include/math/ /usr/include/chemistry/ /usr/include/util/ I would suggest placing all of the include files in a mpqc-specific directory. You can probably do this with a configure option. MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:31:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061231.o06CVMwt023611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:31:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:31:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061231.o06CVDsj023586@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:30:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061230.o06CUoas023508@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Bug 549228 depends on bug 549229, which changed state. Bug 549229 Summary: Please update clutter to latest version in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549229 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:35:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061235.o06CZV3X024950@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2010-01-06 07:35:29 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i bradford:devel$ rpmlint -i perltidy-20090616-3.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. bradford:devel$ rpmlint -i noarch/perltidy-20090616-3.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. bradford:devel$ + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. Package is long time in the practice so renaming doesn't make much sense (and the name makes sense). + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - BAD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Actually it should be GPLv2 only (not GPLv2+ ... cannot find anywhere "or later"). + GOOD: COPYING file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5: 63baa94a96fc5c272e06e72e589e7673 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. yes, builds on x86_64/F12 + GOOD: it's noarch so no issues with other architectures. + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=121809 + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK no scripts + GOOD: not relocatable - UNSURE: A package owns all directories that it creates. I don't like this in %files: %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/ Is this correct? Why not just %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/Tidy.pm + GOOD: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files are set automatically. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. no .so file + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. no -devel package + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. Please correct the indicated issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:44:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061244.o06CicJp026575@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 --- Comment #19 from Jiri Moskovcak 2010-01-06 07:44:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Problems in F-12: > gd.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgd.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 > > In previous review was mentioned problem with -f in these commands, but it's > okay now. > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libgd.la > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/libgd.a > > Could you comment the rpmlint's warning for finishing this review? It's called only in extremely rare cases when some serious error occurs, removing the exit would require to break the API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:46:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061246.o06CkgCx027012@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #17 from Parag AN(????) 2010-01-06 07:46:39 EDT --- Hi Dennis, Can you review this package or I can review it if you don't mind? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:48:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061248.o06Cmms5027490@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-06 07:48:47 EDT --- License: http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/SHANCOCK/Perl-Tidy-20090616/lib/Perl/Tidy.pm GPLv2+ is valid %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/ I suppose someone has to own this directory. That's the perl way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 12:56:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225786] Merge Review: gd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061256.o06CuCUl028919@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225786 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #20 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-06 07:56:10 EDT --- Ok, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 13:38:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552898] New: Merge Review: perl-Authen-SASL - SASL Authentication framework for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Authen-SASL - SASL Authentication framework for Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552898 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Authen-SASL - SASL Authentication framework for Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Authen-SASL/2.13/2.fc13/src/perl-Authen-SASL-2.13-2.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1714350&filename=perl-Authen-SASL.spec Description: SASL is a generic mechanism for authentication used by several network protocols. Authen::SASL provides an implementation framework that all protocols should be able to share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 13:55:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 08:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061355.o06Dt0Wk009719@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2010-01-06 08:54:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/ > I suppose someone has to own this directory. That's the perl way. That's actually the general packaging guidelines way, the dir would be unowned otherwise. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 14:18:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061418.o06EIdP3016165@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2010-01-06 09:18:37 EDT --- Here are some annotationes: - Please use the package name as a prefix for the patch/source to avoid conflicts with other packages in the SOURCES directory - the patch needs a comment wrt to the upstream status, i.e. was it sent to upstream or is it upstreamable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 14:27:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061427.o06ERkDZ002585@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-06 09:27:43 EDT --- * lv2rack here freezes when asking it to display lv2-fil's UI. Process is: python /usr/lib/lv2/filter.lv2/ui osc.udp://localhost:17500/ http://nedko.aranaudov.org/soft/filter/2/mono /usr/lib/lv2/filter.lv2/ 0:4-band parametric filter (Mono) The "ui" python script works when running it manually, though. So, double-checking lv2rack's ability to display UIs: * lv2rack works with other plugins user interfaces, but crashes when loading lv2-swh-plugins' crossfade plugin. Seems there are some grave bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 14:40:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061440.o06Eeb1v021499@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-06 09:40:36 EDT --- You are welcome, any input about %defattr and update mime db issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 14:47:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061447.o06Elv1S023235@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 09:47:55 EDT --- > > Dropped the applist.xml file and will look at what's > > required to package separately or use local repos. > > Without the file the package is pretty useless, so please don't build it for > F12 yet. Feel free to CC me when you submit a package for the applist data. After chatting to some of the Moblin guys I've reviewed this and have currently included a reduced version of it. There's the possibility of having it pull in the repo data in the (hopefully) not to distant future. If that's not done before F-13 I'll review the list and add in some extra packages that work well with the Moblin interface that are in Fedora. > Please also remove adobe-reader.png, skype.png and world-of-goo.png from the > package because I'm not sure about there licenses. chromium.png should be ok I > guess, but all these should be in the applist package. I've currently dropped the included icons all together and linked to the ones in the icon theme. Although I'm thinking of dropping the icons completely or using a generic icon like the gnome package manager does. Thoughts? SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-app-installer-0.4.0-0.4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:15:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552610] Review Request: rasterview - Common Unix Printing System raster file viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061515.o06FFbwu015605@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552610 --- Comment #6 from Tim Waugh 2010-01-06 10:15:36 EDT --- Oh, sorry, missed those. Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/rasterview/rasterview-1.2.1-3.fc12.src.rpm The application/vnd.cups-raster MIME type is getting over-ridden by 'CMU raster image' which also registers for '*.ras'. Not sure if there's anything we can do about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:19:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548522] Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061519.o06FJbSj030844@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-06 10:19:37 EDT --- Why all the hassle with git patches? What's wrong with find and chmod? Are the patches sent upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:34:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061534.o06FYbwk020066@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-06 10:34:36 EDT --- Well, * perl module dependency https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides - When writing perl module rpm dependency as (Build)Requires, use the virtual provides on the package, not the rpm name itself (i.e. use "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed)" * creating directory under home directory - configure.in reads: ----------------------------------------------------------- 60 dnl Check if config directory exists. 61 if test ! -d $HOME/.opendchub; then 62 echo "creating config directory: $HOME/.opendchub" 63 mkdir $HOME/.opendchub 64 chmod 700 $HOME/.opendchub; 65 fi 66 75 if test "$ENABLE_PERL" = "yes"; then 76 AC_CHECK_PROG(ENABLE_PERL, perl, yes, no) 77 if test "$ENABLE_PERL" = "no"; then 78 AC_MSG_WARN(Perl wasn't found. Scripting will be disabled.) 79 else 85 dnl Check if script directory exists. 86 dnl Creates it and copies sample scripts to it if it doesn't. 87 if test ! -d $HOME/.opendchub/scripts; then 88 echo "creating script directory: $HOME/.opendchub/scripts" 89 mkdir $HOME/.opendchub/scripts 90 chmod 700 $HOME/.opendchub/scripts; 91 for i in Samplescripts/*; do 92 cp $i $HOME/.opendchub/scripts; 93 done 94 fi 95 fi 96 else 97 echo "Perl script support is disabled." 98 fi ----------------------------------------------------------- and build.log says: ----------------------------------------------------------- 129 Switch user support is enabled. 130 creating config directory: /builddir/.opendchub 131 checking for perl... yes 132 creating script directory: /builddir/.opendchub/scripts ----------------------------------------------------------- Well, - build process should not create any directories under home directory. If these directories are needed, they should be created when the program is actually executed. Also Fedora forbids to create directories under home directory during build process: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Scriplets_are_only_allowed_to_write_in_certain_directories - Furthermore, these created directories are not installed when installing this software with rpm anyway. So this behavior (i.e creating directories under home directory and installing some scripts under there during build) should be suppressed. - By the way maybe Samplescripts/ should be included as %doc. * %changelog - It is recommended (and useful when using Fedora CVS) to insert one line between each %changelog entry like: --------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Jan 3 2009 Roshan Kumar Singh 0.8.1-3 - Changed Group to a more appropriate one * Sun Jan 3 2009 Roshan Kumar Singh 0.8.1-2 - Removed glibc-devel and added perl-devel to BR and changed configure * Sat Jan 2 2009 Roshan Kumar Singh 0.8.1-1 - First RPM for opendchub --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:40:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061540.o06FekGA021350@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:42:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061542.o06FgZo5003805@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #37 from Alexander Kahl 2010-01-06 10:42:28 EDT --- David: I'd really appreciate if you'd also join the discussion Jerry started at fedora-devel :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:42:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061542.o06Fgvxf003879@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 10:42:56 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec * Wed Jan 6 2010 Orion Poplawski 2.0-2 - Unversion javadoc dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:52:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061552.o06Fq9wP005558@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-06 10:52:08 EDT --- Thanks, the package is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:55:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061555.o06FtWdD006139@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 Jan Zeleny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzeleny at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jan Zeleny 2010-01-06 10:55:30 EDT --- Hi, I'm current maintainer of nc and I'd like to finish this review. Could you please check latest build in Koji? I think everything is ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 15:59:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 10:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061559.o06FxKI8007057@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Bug 540986 depends on bug 530986, which changed state. Bug 530986 Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Bug 540986 depends on bug 542730, which changed state. Bug 542730 Summary: Please add Maven depmap fragments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542730 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Bug 540986 depends on bug 543081, which changed state. Bug 543081 Summary: Please add Maven depmap fragments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 10:59:19 EDT --- jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jakarta-commons-fileupload-1.2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:02:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061602.o06G2ReV025606@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-01-06 11:02:26 EDT --- Oops ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:07:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061607.o06G7OPr027209@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-06 11:07:23 EDT --- Umm, Marcela? This package is already in Fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:07:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061607.o06G7tKY027316@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 11:07:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: BareBonesBrowserLaunch Short Description: Simple library to launch a browser window from Java Owners: orion Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:13:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061613.o06GD3I6028489@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-06 11:13:01 EDT --- Can you please update the source package and make a release of it? Look at the changes I did in git, there are more packages that need to be fixed. After that, please update the spec with the changes from the comments above, so I can review the package. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:59:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061659.o06Gx6ZD005475@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|530088 | --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-01-06 11:59:05 EDT --- I've added a workaround to the spec file to add the necessary build information for the geronimo-specs package, so this package is no longer blocked by the geronimo-specs update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 16:57:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 11:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061657.o06Gv8BR019165@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) | --- Comment #12 from David Woodhouse 2010-01-06 11:57:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/kernel-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/kernel-firmware-20100106-1.src.rpm The .bz2 files are created automatically by the kernel.org mirroring system; the .gz is the original. We are slowly working on getting the dvb firmware into the upstream git repository; there's not a lot we can do about that in the scope of the package review. I think this is ready to be shipped now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:12:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225985] Merge Review: libaio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061712.o06HCnpH022778@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225985 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Eric Sandeen 2010-01-06 12:12:47 EDT --- So just as a drive-by partial review, for fedora at least: rpmlint -i libaio-0.3.107-9.1.fc13.src.rpm libaio.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. It'd be great to have: URL: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/libaio/libaio.git in there (or whatever the appropriate starting-point for folks looking for libaio might be...) Also, for releases that have a tarball under http://kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/aio/, please change to: Source: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/aio/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz libaio.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. I guess it wants "-q" ;) libaio.src:233: W: macro-in-%changelog %files Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. This is due to: * Sat Apr 12 2002 Benjamin LaHaise - add /lib/libredhat-kernel* to %files. which is trivial to fix. libaio.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 55) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. ok that's just a nitpick. As for the built binaries: # rpmlint -i /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libaio-0.3.107-9.1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libaio.x86_64: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. same as above libaio.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /lib64/libaio.so.1.0.0 libaio.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information /lib64/libaio.so.1.0.1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. this is because src/Makefile has -nostdlib -nostartfiles - I'm not sure what the point of that is... # rpmlint -i /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libaio-devel-0.3.107-9.1.fc12.x86_64.rpm libaio-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-dependency-on libaio/libaio-libs/liblibaio 0.3.107 libaio-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. same as above. libaio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. *shrug* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:18:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: linux-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061718.o06HIpha009627@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |kernel-firmware - firmware |linux-firmware - firmware |files for use with Linux |files for use with Linux |kernel |kernel --- Comment #13 from David Woodhouse 2010-01-06 12:18:50 EDT --- Renamed to linux-firmware for consistency with upstream. And the mirror script finally made the .bz2 file, so I included that too. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/linux-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/linux-firmware-20100106-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:27:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: linux-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061727.o06HRTtW011078@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Kyle McMartin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kmcmartin at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:26:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225985] Merge Review: libaio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061726.o06HQkH5010979@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225985 --- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen 2010-01-06 12:26:45 EDT --- One "Must" tidbit: MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage You just have: %package devel Summary: Development files for Linux-native asynchronous I/O access Group: Development/System Requires: libaio without the version & release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:40:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548522] Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061740.o06HeIU2028166@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522 --- Comment #2 from James Laska 2010-01-06 12:40:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why all the hassle with git patches? What's wrong with find and chmod? The initial packaging work was done by Jesse Keating. Git is being used during the build as it is easier for the packager to manage keeping the local patch set in sync and in a format acceptable for submission upstream. > Are the patches sent upstream? Patch1: 0001-Change-usr-local-to-usr-share-where-necessary.patch This patch is specific to where Fedora prefers package content to live. Upstream currently uses /usr/local/autotest, and it was determined that /usr/share/autotest was a more appropriate place for Fedora. Understandably, there isn't interest in taking this patch upstream. Patch2: 0002-Set-file-permissions-appropriately.patch Patch3: 0003-Don-t-hardcode-python2.4.patch These patches are already fixed upstream, but not in the current 0.11.0 release of autotest. They will however be included in upstream 0.11.1 and future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:40:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061740.o06HexFU014703@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |552972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:40:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061740.o06HewOo014694@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |552972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:42:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061742.o06Hgg4q029180@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-06 12:42:41 EDT --- Well, "$ rake spec" should be executed in %check, however currently this fails on rawhide due to actionpack <-> rack dependency error (bug 552972) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:43:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061743.o06HheCX029345@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-06 12:43:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Well, I have not looked into the newest srpm yet, however > at least scratch build fails on rawhide: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1903695 > > Note that rawhide uses rubygem-rack-1.1.0-1.fc13 Actually rubygem-actionpack is broken with rack 1.1.0 (bug 552972) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 17:55:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061755.o06HtLNN032315@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 12:55:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udunits2 Short Description: A library for manipulating units of physical quantities Owners: spot orion Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 18:00:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061800.o06I0ord001111@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-06 13:00:50 EDT --- Sorry for not getting to this sooner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 18:41:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: linux-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061841.o06IflN1010738@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-01-06 13:41:41 EDT --- I don't see the review, Kyle. Anyway, the package is in a good shape, except missing "Require: udev" (owner of the /lib/firmware directory). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 18:56:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: linux-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061856.o06IuL7D001199@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from David Woodhouse 2010-01-06 13:56:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linux-firmware Short Description: Firmware files used by the Linux kernel Owners: dwmw2 Branches: F-12 InitialCC: dwmw2 kernel-maint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 19:18:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552999] New: Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 Summary: Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Grab pods and drop them in the gate, while fighting enemies in your way. Written in C++/nCurses, with SDL_mixer for sound. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/curfender/curfender.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/curfender/curfender-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 19:30:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061930.o06JUE1I027545@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-06 14:30:13 EDT --- Hi Orion, What do you think about renaming the project to apache-commons-jexl? If yes I'll review it. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 19:38:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061938.o06Jcnge005793@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 14:38:48 EDT --- Why? It goes against the packaging guidelines as far as I can tell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 19:47:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:47:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001061947.o06JlR7e032751@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-06 14:47:25 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architecture/PowerPC#PPC_Shell_access_for_debugging and as far as I know, Kevin Fenzi (kevin) offers access to 32-bit powerpc machines. [...] > fix_lib_path.patch You could have simply dropped the absolute library path altogether export LD_PRELOAD=libtsocks.so because it is stored in default search path for libraries. That would be arch-independent. [...] "man 8 tsocks" refers to /lib/libtsocks.so which doesn't match the current packaging. [...] Some additional run-time testing. From the bottom of "man 1 tsocks", | | create a new shell with LD_PRELOAD including tsocks(8). and the header of /usr/bin/tsocks: | The third form creates a new shell with LD_PRELOAD set and is achieved | simply by running the script with no arguments | | /usr/bin/tsocks | | When finished the user can simply terminate the shell with 'exit' Doesn't work: $ tsocks /usr/bin/tsocks: insufficient arguments $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:03:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062003.o06K3ch3013501@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mnowak at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(adrian at lisas.de) --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2010-01-06 15:03:36 EDT --- I need libmpdclient for ncmpcpp-0.5, so, I'll do review. Could you, please, first update to latest upstrem 2.1 version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:08:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:08:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062008.o06K89E3005384@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-06 15:08:08 EDT --- At least for me commons is somehow too common that's why I'm asking for it. According to the guidelines we should use our best judgement and I think that apache-commons-* is way more descriptive than simply commons-*. But it is your right to think the other way ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:10:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062010.o06KAgYt015822@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-06 15:10:40 EDT --- Well, either one would be fine, IMO. With audacious-plugin-fc and audacious-plugin-xmp, some packagers complained about not putting them into the "audacious-plugins-" namespace. :) Hence I appended the "s" to match all other gstreamer-plugins- packages. There's nothing in the guidelines about this. There has been only one good rationale for appending the "s" even if it's just a single plugin: Users who are accustomed to queries like "yum list gstreamer-plugins\*" would not see the packages without "s". Btw, some of the audacious-plugins-foo packages contain only a single plugin, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:19:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062019.o06KJU83017901@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 15:19:29 EDT --- adding a blocker on fe-legal spot, this package references 3rd party repos. They are laptop.org related repos. Can you confirm whether this is allowed in a mainline fedora package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:22:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062022.o06KMMUi009945@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 15:22:22 EDT --- To confirm, I'm referring to this http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/repos/ksmain.50.repos.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:30:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062030.o06KUbu1011937@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 --- Comment #4 from Tomeu Vizoso 2010-01-06 15:30:36 EDT --- Thanks for working on this. Looks like we can drop the patch, the upstream maintainer just said in #pyxpcom: (09:20:39 PM) toddw: tomeu: the patch is out of date - this was already fixed in pyxpcom trunk (09:20:40 PM) toddw: http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/rev/8e0661d279a9 (09:20:45 PM) toddw: http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/rev/2cb5add2914a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:40:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062040.o06KeI2w023537@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #38 from Carl Byington 2010-01-06 15:40:17 EDT --- fixed. include files moved to /usr/include/mpqc/* remove rpath from sc-config script http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-10.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1905748 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:48:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062048.o06KmbG7025602@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 Bug 225778 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:48:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062048.o06Kmdm8025616@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 Bug 248363 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 20:48:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062048.o06KmaGC025589@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-06 15:48:33 EDT --- Definitely should not be closed. I will do my best to have another look at this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:04:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062104.o06L4Vfp029732@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #29 from Julian G 2010-01-06 16:04:29 EDT --- What else is needed to get this into the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:07:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062107.o06L7h3m021920@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-06 16:07:41 EDT --- * License is "GPLv3+" because of the "any later version" in the GPL header of the source files. * Why are the *.py source files not included in the font-manager-0.4.2-4.fc12.noarch build? That's so untypical for Python. It may be necessary to patch the Makefile to install the *.py files and possibly take the chance to compile with -O1 instead of -O0. * Here are some Python specific packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python * The "tmpdir" code in /usr/share/font-manager/export.py* is reason to worry. While shutil.rmtree does not follow symlinks, an attacker could cause another user's font-manager to crash (raising an OSError exception) by creating arbitrary symlinks in /tmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:17:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062117.o06LHRBS000881@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 --- Comment #2 from Mat Booth 2010-01-06 16:17:26 EDT --- What kind of idiot uploads the wrong package? Terribly sorry, try this one: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/xml-stylebook.spec SPRM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/xml-stylebook-1.0-0.2.b3_xalan2.svn313293.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:25:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062125.o06LPwx4026986@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 16:25:53 EDT --- themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:25:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062125.o06LPnEg003113@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 16:25:48 EDT --- themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:30:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062130.o06LURoM028013@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:30:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:27:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062127.o06LRGs4027213@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #7 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-06 16:27:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks-1.8-0.5.beta5.fc12.src.rpm Thank you for the pointer on PPC, I will try to contact him soon. > fix_lib_path.patch I used this trick to differentiate i386 and x86_64 library path since I have seen this code in ALSA source a long time ago. In this case, I think that your simple solution is much better than this old trick! I have updated the patch with this one. > "man 8 tsocks" refers to /lib/libtsocks.so The upstream author recommend putting the library directly in /lib to be available at boot time. I don't personally think it's the good place, so I changed the library folder and just fixed the documentation. > Some additional run-time testing ... Doesn't work You are right, this option didn't work as planned. I use tsocks since four years and never used that feature! The problem is directly at the start of upstream bash script. I have fixed and tested it Also, I have changed the patchs file name to be more consistent with guidelines. I have also removed INSTALL from %doc as I don't think it's necessary. rpmlint give the same warnings/errors and package build fine in mock. Thank you for your feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:33:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062133.o06LXFih004679@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:33:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:31:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062131.o06LVqIB004457@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:31:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:33:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062133.o06LXsNt028635@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:33:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:38:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062138.o06LcI3D006453@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:38:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:36:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:36:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: linux-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062136.o06La7eF005532@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:36:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:40:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062140.o06LepkZ007252@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:40:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:39:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062139.o06Ld6Xi006677@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:39:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:42:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062142.o06LgDo6030682@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-06 16:42:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:48:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062148.o06Lmnwb032306@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 Bug 484281 depends on bug 484279, which changed state. Bug 484279 Summary: Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:48:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062148.o06Lmmws032296@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 16:48:47 EDT --- Checked in and built. Updates to follow shortly. Thanks all... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 21:49:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 16:49:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062149.o06LnHtO032393@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-06 16:49:16 EDT --- OK, I checked out the current CVS and indeed it builds fine and rpmlint is silent. However, there are still a couple of issues: There's still no documentation on actually recreating the CVS checkout. I don't know if the information I posted nearly three years ago in comment #8 is still valid, but we really so need to get some information on precisely where the source comes from. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL When a package accumulates so many patches, it is really important to keep track of their upstream status. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment At this point, given the number of patches with no information about their upstream status and the lack of information on the upstream source, it begins to seem as if Fedora is maintaining its own fork of nc, which I doubt is something that we want to be doing. Nothing seems to own /usr/share/nc; you should probably just add "%{_datadir}/nc" to %files and remove the two lines referencing %{_datadir}/nc/scripts. But then there are a couple of other points: If you expect that people will actually want to run those scripts, why not give them sensible non-conflicting names and actually install them in the usual path for executables? If they aren't supposed to be run, why not keep them in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:16:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062216.o06MGAIf008188@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 Kris Buytaert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kris.buytaert at inuits.be --- Comment #1 from Kris Buytaert 2010-01-06 17:16:09 EDT --- First quick look : $ rpmlint libwiiuse-0.12-0.fc11.src.rpm libwiiuse.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint wiiuse.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package fails against : MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:17:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547622] Review Request: python-cloudservers - Python bindings to the Rackspace Cloud Servers API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062217.o06MHwjH017475@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547622 Kris Buytaert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kris.buytaert at inuits.be --- Comment #1 from Kris Buytaert 2010-01-06 17:17:57 EDT --- First quick look reveals Package fails on rpmlint $ rpmlint python-cloudservers-1.0a3-1.fc12.src.rpm python-cloudservers.src: E: description-line-too-long ``cloudservers`` module), and a command-line script (``cloudservers``). Each implements 100% of the Rackspace API. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-cloudservers.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:25:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546445] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062225.o06MPO0f010813@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445 Kris Buytaert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kris.buytaert at inuits.be --- Comment #1 from Kris Buytaert 2010-01-06 17:25:23 EDT --- First quick look : $ rpmlint nagios-plugins-check-updates.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint nagios-plugins-check-updates-1.4.6-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:25:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547601] Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062225.o06MPH8F019456@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547601 Kris Buytaert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kris.buytaert at inuits.be --- Comment #1 from Kris Buytaert 2010-01-06 17:25:15 EDT --- First quick look . $ rpmlint perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-pfacter.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:30:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547601] Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062230.o06MUueW020594@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547601 --- Comment #2 from Kris Buytaert 2010-01-06 17:30:54 EDT --- I tried building the pacakge. I think there are some build dependencies missing . $ rpmbuild -ba perl-pfacter.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5nNsrY + umask 022 + cd /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf pfacter-1.13-3 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/sdog/rpmbuild/SOURCES/pfacter-1.13-3.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd pfacter-1.13-3 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wAOOZt + umask 022 + cd /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd pfacter-1.13-3 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Checking if your kit is complete... Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: t/01-core.t Please inform the author. Writing Makefile for Pfacter + make -j2 cp lib/Pfacter/cfversion.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/cfversion.pm cp lib/Pfacter.pm blib/lib/Pfacter.pm cp lib/Pfacter/localtime.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/localtime.pm cp lib/Pfacter/kernel.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/kernel.pm cp lib/Pfacter/kernelrelease.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/kernelrelease.pm cp lib/Pfacter/architecture.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/architecture.pm cp lib/Pfacter/hostname.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/hostname.pm cp lib/Pfacter/memorytotal.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/memorytotal.pm cp lib/Pfacter/serialnumber.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/serialnumber.pm cp lib/Pfacter/uniqueid.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/uniqueid.pm cp lib/Pfacter/lsbrelease.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/lsbrelease.pm cp lib/Pfacter/operatingsystem.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/operatingsystem.pm cp lib/Pfacter/kernelversion.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/kernelversion.pm cp lib/Pfacter/cfclasses.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/cfclasses.pm cp lib/Pfacter/swap.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/swap.pm cp lib/Pfacter/hardwaremodel.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/hardwaremodel.pm cp lib/Pfacter/hardwaremanufacturer.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/hardwaremanufacturer.pm cp lib/Pfacter/fqdn.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/fqdn.pm cp lib/Pfacter/filesystems.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/filesystems.pm cp lib/Pfacter/hardwareplatform.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/hardwareplatform.pm cp lib/Pfacter/processor.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/processor.pm cp lib/Pfacter/wwn.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/wwn.pm cp lib/Pfacter/domain.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/domain.pm cp lib/Pfacter/macaddress.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/macaddress.pm cp lib/Pfacter/memory.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/memory.pm cp pfacter.pod blib/lib/pfacter.pod cp lib/Pfacter/disk.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/disk.pm cp lib/Pfacter/productid.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/productid.pm cp lib/Pfacter/hardwareproduct.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/hardwareproduct.pm cp lib/Pfacter/lsbid.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/lsbid.pm cp lib/Pfacter/ipaddress.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/ipaddress.pm cp lib/Pfacter/lsbdescription.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/lsbdescription.pm cp lib/Pfacter/processorcount.pm blib/lib/Pfacter/processorcount.pm Manifying blib/man3/pfacter.3pm + exit 0 Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.f2ql00 + umask 022 + cd /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 ++ dirname /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 + mkdir -p /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT + mkdir /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 + cd pfacter-1.13-3 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + rm -rf /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 + make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=/home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/pfacter.pod Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/ipaddress.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/lsbrelease.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/kernelrelease.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/productid.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/uniqueid.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/cfclasses.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/hardwareplatform.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/swap.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/memory.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/localtime.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/cfversion.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/domain.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/hardwaremodel.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/hardwaremanufacturer.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/kernelversion.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/hostname.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/filesystems.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/macaddress.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/lsbid.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/lsbdescription.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/architecture.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/memorytotal.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/serialnumber.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/hardwareproduct.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/wwn.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/kernel.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/processorcount.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/operatingsystem.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/processor.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/fqdn.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pfacter/disk.pm Installing /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/man/man3/pfacter.3pm Writing /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Pfacter/.packlist + find /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f '{}' ';' + find /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386 -depth -type d -exec rmdir '{}' ';' + chmod -R u+w /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.i386/usr + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3 find: `debug': No such file or directory + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YHRW6y + umask 022 + cd /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd pfacter-1.13-3 + unset DISPLAY + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00-load.t ...... Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/lib /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/arch /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/lib/perl4 /soft/www/libwww-perl-040 /soft/www/PerlLib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl) at t/00-load.t line 3. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/00-load.t line 3. t/00-load.t ...... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) No subtests run t/01-kernel.t .... Can't locate Test/Simple.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/lib /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/arch /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/lib/perl4 /soft/www/libwww-perl-040 /soft/www/PerlLib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/lib/perl4 /soft/www/libwww-perl-040 /soft/www/PerlLib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl .) at t/01-kernel.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/01-kernel.t line 5. t/01-kernel.t .... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) No subtests run t/boilerplate.t .. Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/lib /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/arch /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/lib/perl4 /soft/www/libwww-perl-040 /soft/www/PerlLib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl) at t/boilerplate.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/boilerplate.t line 5. t/boilerplate.t .. Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) No subtests run t/pod.t .......... Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/lib /home/sdog/rpmbuild/BUILD/pfacter-1.13-3/blib/arch /usr/local/lib/perl5 /usr/lib/perl4 /soft/www/libwww-perl-040 /soft/www/PerlLib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl) at t/pod.t line 5. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/pod.t line 5. t/pod.t .......... Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) No subtests run Test Summary Report ------------------- t/00-load.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output t/01-kernel.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output t/boilerplate.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output t/pod.t (Wstat: 512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 2 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output Files=4, Tests=0, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.06 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 4/4 test programs. 0/0 subtests failed. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YHRW6y (%check) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YHRW6y (%check) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:41:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062241.o06MfdRJ014600@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Damien Durand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:42:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552113] Review Request: libwiiuse - library to use wiiremotes via bluetooth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062242.o06Mgnm6014966@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552113 --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce 2010-01-06 17:42:48 EDT --- oops sorry, I forgot to rename it after I decided to rename the package from wiiuse to libwiiuse. I have uploaded a new src.rpm and spec file with the right name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 22:48:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062248.o06Mmn0d025316@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #39 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-06 17:48:47 EDT --- Oh, there's still something a bit odd: /usr/share/man/man3/LocalHSOSContribution.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/LocalHSOSEnergyContribution.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/LocalHSOSGradContribution.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/MPQC_CartesianIterCCA.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/TCPClientConnection.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/TCPIOSocket.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/TCPServerConnection.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/TCPServerSocket.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/TCPSocket.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/Taylor_Fjt_Eval.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/YYSTYPE.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/errno_exception.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/point.3.gz and /usr/share/man/man3/vertex.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/vertices.3.gz that are in -devel. These are way too generic for my taste. The other man3 files are prefixed with sc_, so maybe those could be renamed. You could contact upstream about this.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:03:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:03:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062303.o06N3XVW028945@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2010-01-06 18:03:31 EDT --- OK, I feel persuaded. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:12:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062312.o06NCW7N031634@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-06 18:12:31 EDT --- Checked in and built. Thanks all... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:12:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter widget toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062312.o06NCC74022288@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 18:12:11 EDT --- Built and in rawhide. Thanks for the review and feedback! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:20:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] New: Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Summary: Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/gpxe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/gpxe-0.9.9-2.src.rpm Description: gPXE is an open source (GPL) network bootloader. It provides a direct replacement for proprietary PXE ROMs, with many extra features such as DNS, HTTP, iSCSI, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:23:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062323.o06NNfOg001711@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-06 18:23:40 EDT --- Special attention to the -devel subpackage being required (indirectly to make rpmlint stfu), while this subpackage is the actual option value to end-users. The base package would ship a default Fedora configuration with binary files, and a script to build your own (requiring the -devel subpackage). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:33:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062333.o06NX9WQ027657@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 18:33:08 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/orbited-0.7.10-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:33:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062333.o06NX0Cs027611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 18:32:58 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:33:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062333.o06NX4gI027634@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-06 18:33:04 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/orbited-0.7.10-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 6 23:46:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001062346.o06NkXde007333@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-06 18:46:32 EDT --- built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 00:30:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 19:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070030.o070UX7o012501@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 --- Comment #5 from J.H. 2010-01-06 19:30:32 EDT --- COPYING is now included in the spec file, re-uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:04:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523650] Review Request: qmpdclient - A Qt4 based MPD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070104.o07141oB022048@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #30 from xandry 2010-01-06 20:04:00 EDT --- Because, that this is your first package, you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:01:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550102] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070101.o0711tFH021465@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-06 20:01:53 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1906251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:07:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070107.o0717Di6022882@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 --- Comment #6 from J.H. 2010-01-06 20:07:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gitweb-caching Short Description: gitweb with an additional caching layer as run on kernel.org Owners: warthog9 Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: warthog9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:12:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070112.o071C9tl032253@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-06 20:12:07 EDT --- Thank you very much for reviewing - a step closer to darcs-2.3. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:14:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070114.o071EFOB000516@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2010-01-06 20:14:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-mmap Short Description: Haskell binding to mmap Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 01:27:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 20:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552999] Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070127.o071RjWK028099@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-06 20:27:45 EDT --- "Defender" is still trademarked (about a million different ways, of course, but I believe I found the trademark specific to the video game). We can't call something a "clone of Defender". http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4009:77oh7l.9.122 Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:12:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070212.o072Cdua005621@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #40 from Carl Byington 2010-01-06 21:12:38 EDT --- done. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-11.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1906312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:18:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070218.o072IcWd006718@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #4 from Scott Collier 2010-01-06 21:18:37 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:17:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070217.o072HuIA006616@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 Bug 225778 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:17:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070217.o072HvFp006629@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 Bug 248363 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:17:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:17:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070217.o072HsC5006606@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-06 21:17:52 EDT --- I checked current CVS. Things look good; the only thing I can see currently is that I don't really understand the need for the conditional in the devel scriptlets: if [ -f %{_infodir}/gmp.info.gz ]; then /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/gmp.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir || : fi I guess the idea is to protect against an --excludedocs install, but that's not necessary as the recommended scriptlet (just the second line) handles that case just fine. In any case, it's only four pointless lines and this has gone on long enough, so I guess we're done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:45:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547601] Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070245.o072jOSk012736@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547601 --- Comment #3 from Michael Stahnke 2010-01-06 21:45:23 EDT --- Was missing a BR on perl(Test::More) for some reason I thought that was in the buildroot already. Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-pfacter.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 02:59:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070259.o072xhcJ015479@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |BuildFails --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-06 21:59:41 EDT --- Sorry for not being able to take another look at this sooner, but it still doesn't seem to build for me: + pushd lib/hs + /usr/bin/runghc Setup configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64 --docdir=/usr/share/doc/thrift-0.1.0 --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries/Thrift-0.1.0 '--libsubdir=$compiler/$pkgid' --ghc -p Configuring Thrift-0.1.0... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: network -any This is against current rawhide. Unfortunately I've no idea at all about Haskell so I'm not even sure what to do to debug it. A scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1906387 if you'd like to see the full logs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 03:07:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532402] Review Request: APF - Advanced Policy Firewall In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070307.o07375u8017587@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532402 --- Comment #5 from Mark McKinstry 2010-01-06 22:07:04 EDT --- I'm still alive, I've just been busy. I'm planning on working on the APF rpm this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 03:23:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070323.o073NncS006439@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #6 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-06 22:23:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > * perl module dependency > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides > - When writing perl module rpm dependency as (Build)Requires, > use the virtual provides on the package, not the rpm name itself > (i.e. use "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Embed)" Done! The very next line in the above links says "packages link to libperl.so, usually to provide embedded perl functionality. All of these packages must also use the versioned MODULE_COMPAT Requires. " So I think this is needed as well Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) > > * creating directory under home directory [snip] > Well, > - build process should not create any directories under home > directory. If these directories are needed, they should be > created when the program is actually executed. The binary also creates the directories. I will remove this thing in the next release. > So this behavior (i.e creating directories under home directory > and installing some scripts under there during build) should > be suppressed. I have done this by %build %configure --enable-switch_user rm -rf $HOME/.opendchub Is it okay ? Other changes have also been made. I will renew the SPEC after you confirm the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 03:38:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070338.o073c9UV025298@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-06 22:38:08 EDT --- One last thing: We might not even be allowed to ship the icons in question in the SRPM, so you should remove them before creating the tar file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 03:37:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070337.o073bIWJ024964@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-06 22:37:16 EDT --- I agree with you in both points: 1. Lets work with a reduced applist to get this package reviewed. We can still make a package for the applist later if necessary. 2. For the icons I think a generic icon is best because the current "trick" with the symling will not work reliable. It will only show icons of installed apps. Best would be to link to /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ (because it contains the actual application icons) and fall back to a generic icon if an icon is not found. Not sure how much work this is and I don't consider this a blocker, because the installer will also work with no icons at all. The new applist is fine, all blockers are fixed, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 03:52:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 22:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070352.o073q7Sb015107@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 22:52:06 EDT --- Hi Christoph, thanks for the review. I'll investigate the query about the icons in the tarball. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-app-installer Short Description: Moblin Application Installer Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 04:33:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518910] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070433.o074XpCJ024269@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518910 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-06 23:33:50 EDT --- This is updated srpm and spec file, which I merged cantonhk and jyutping: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cantonese-1.2.0.20100107-1.fc12.src.rpm http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cantonese.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 04:35:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 23:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518910] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070435.o074ZPhj007565@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518910 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 06:06:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 01:06:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070606.o0766kj5028234@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge | |.net) --- Comment #34 from Alex Lancaster 2010-01-07 01:06:42 EDT --- Matthias: ping? Will you still be able to sponsor Graeme or should we perhaps search for a new one if you don't have time to do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:05:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070705.o0775Lj7011207@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #41 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-07 02:05:19 EDT --- OK. One final comment: use -p in cp -r doc/man %{buildroot}%{_datadir} to preserve time stamps. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:20:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070720.o077KPu1007970@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthew Kent 2010-01-07 02:20:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-merb-core Short Description: Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:27:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070727.o077RWYL009223@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 02:27:30 EDT --- rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:26:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070726.o077Qf1Z015981@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-07 02:26:40 EDT --- Yes, but I didn't find a merge or package review ticket and I need one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:28:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070728.o077S3Mx016211@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 02:28:02 EDT --- rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:43:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528010] Review Request: PyMca - GUI for multi-channel analyser spectra visualization and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070743.o077hIv4019402@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528010 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 02:43:17 EDT --- PyMca-4.3.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyMca-4.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:49:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070749.o077n6Y3021188@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(adrian at lisas.de) | --- Comment #2 from Adrian Reber 2010-01-07 02:49:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpdclient.spec SRPM URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpdclient-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Update to 2.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 07:56:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 02:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553127] New: Merge Review: perl-Sub-Uplevel - Apparently run a function in a higher stack frame Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Sub-Uplevel - Apparently run a function in a higher stack frame https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553127 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Sub-Uplevel - Apparently run a function in a higher stack frame Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Sub-Uplevel/0.2002/4.fc13/src/perl-Sub-Uplevel-0.2002-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1712222&filename=perl-Sub-Uplevel.spec Description: Like Tcl's uplevel() function, but not quite so dangerous. The idea is just to fool caller(). All the really naughty bits of Tcl's uplevel() are avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:16:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070816.o078GEhX027825@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 --- Comment #5 from Martin Stransky 2010-01-07 03:16:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for working on this. Looks like we can drop the patch, the upstream > maintainer just said in #pyxpcom: > > (09:20:39 PM) toddw: tomeu: the patch is out of date - this was already fixed > in pyxpcom trunk > (09:20:40 PM) toddw: http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/rev/8e0661d279a9 > (09:20:45 PM) toddw: http://hg.mozilla.org/pyxpcom/rev/2cb5add2914a Yes, I know, but I prefer to get review for this working version and then do any other update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:20:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070820.o078KiCI022498@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #5 from Jan Huta? 2010-01-07 03:20:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=381859) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381859) [details] > rpmfluff.patch > > The attached patch addresses several small issues during review, including: > * rpmlint typo in %description > * incorrect permissions on rpmfluff.py > * Adding a %Requires on python > * Removing file header from rpmfluff.py to correct rpmlint error I have applied the patch. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:26:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:26:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070826.o078Qbjj030924@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #10 from Silas Sewell 2010-01-07 03:26:35 EDT --- I fixed the dependency issue, unfortunately it looks like Haskell is pretty broken in rawhide. Looking at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Haskell and some of other Haskell related bugs it looks like they're rebuilding the specs with a new tool (or something...). Either way the package below builds on F-12. SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/thrift-0.2-0.5.20091112svn835538.fc12.src.rpm If they don't get it fixed soon I'll remove the haskell libraries and rebuild. P.S. I'm slowing adding EPEL support, so thats the reason for the extra conditionals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:23:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070823.o078N5uZ023156@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #6 from Jan Huta? 2010-01-07 03:23:03 EDT --- Also thanks to James help on IRC rpmfluff is now distributed using EGGs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:27:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070827.o078RQxR031093@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #7 from Jan Huta? 2010-01-07 03:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > # as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > # upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > # Guidelines for how to deal with this. > NOT OK > > $ curl https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 > | md5sum > b349770877d43d9fd71d53ece24a4165 > > $ rpm -ivh > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm > 1:python-rpmfluff ########################################### [100%] > $ md5sum /tmp/jlaska-rpm/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 > db40cf13beb5241835d9256a90e998be > /tmp/jlaska-rpm/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 Fixed now in 0.3-3: $ curl https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 | md5sum cd00673f122358f29a2635b96c46a5bd - $ rpm -ivh https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/python-rpmfluff-0.3-3.fc12.src.rpm 1:python-rpmfluff ########################################### [100%] $ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 cd00673f122358f29a2635b96c46a5bd rpmbuild/SOURCES/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 > # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > # that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > # inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > OK > > If you wish to change to using python distutils, you may wish to add > BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel Added. Thank you for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:44:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:44:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553140] New: Merge Review: perl-MailTools - Various mail-related perl modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-MailTools - Various mail-related perl modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553140 Summary: Merge Review: perl-MailTools - Various mail-related perl modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-MailTools/2.05/1.fc13/src/perl-MailTools-2.05-1.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1741024&filename=perl-MailTools.spec Description: MailTools is a set of Perl modules related to mail applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:48:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070848.o078m2mJ029121@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #8 from Jan Huta? 2010-01-07 03:47:59 EDT --- New build is on: Spec URL: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/rpmfluff.git?p=rpmfluff.git;a=blob_plain;f=python-rpmfluff.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/python-rpmfluff-0.3-3.fc12.src.rpm TARBAL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/rpmfluff-0.3.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 08:53:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 03:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553142] New: Merge review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553142 Summary: Merge review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-MIME-tools/5.427/4.fc13/src/perl-MIME-tools-5.427-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1712328&filename=perl-MIME-tools.spec Description: MIME-tools is a collection of Perl5 MIME:: modules for parsing, decoding, and generating single- or multipart (even nested multipart) MIME messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 09:44:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 04:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552999] Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001070944.o079iHH2017495@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-07 04:44:15 EDT --- I had a quick glance at the SPEC file and I found some problems: * "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" is required because you install icons in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* * For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files * You mixed macro styles. You used both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS * You didn't use the name macro in Source0 but you used the version macro. Please be consistent and use both: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 10:17:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071017.o07AHOTA019855@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #8 from Scott Tsai 2010-01-07 05:17:22 EDT --- Dear all, this package review has gone a month without seeing new comments. Am I correct to assume that the RPM packaging review part can be considered finished and the package can go into Fedora once I find a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 10:19:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071019.o07AJ3Os025664@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Parag AN(????) 2010-01-07 05:18:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1904607 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 92ea94f48a39af2776bb274a66f1a5db055dd745 pki-ca-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + initscript scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 10:25:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071025.o07APt3M021973@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Tom?? B?atek 2010-01-07 05:25:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > cvs done. Thanks! libgnome-keyring-2.29.4-1.fc13 has been built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=149812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 10:28:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:28:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071028.o07ASa84028458@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-07 05:28:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-ca Short Description: The Dogtag Certificate Authority Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 10:48:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 05:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071048.o07AmqrY000474@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #35 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2010-01-07 05:48:45 EDT --- Aleksey thank you for the bugreport, but qutim already build and imported and it is not subject of Review Request. Please, for each problems in qutim fill separate bugs. Meantime I'll look on it. You say what plugins does not loaded in x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:04:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071104.o07B4s26012989@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 Michal Fojtik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfojtik at redhat.com Platform|All |noarch Version|rawhide |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:04:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] New: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfojtik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.spec Description: Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort. http://www.sinatrarb.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:04:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553186] New: Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 Summary: Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sean at middleditch.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/jansson/jansson.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/fedora/jansson/jansson-1.1.3-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Small library for parsing and writing JSON documents. rpmlint output: elanthis at stargrazer:~/Source/Fedora/jansson$ rpmlint jansson.spec /home/elanthis/rpmbuild/SRPMS/jansson-1.1.3-1.fc13.src.rpm /home/elanthis/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/jansson-* jansson-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (I was told to ignore that particular warning in both of my prior accepted packages.) Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1906955 Only thing I'm unsure about at all is if this patch for adding pkg-config is acceptable. It's very easy to remove if not. I included the regenerated autoconf/automake files so there would be no package build-time dependency on those tools. A simplified patch without the generated files has been emailed to the upstream author (http://www.digip.org/) for potential inclusion in the next upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:23:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071123.o07BNGrT009427@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 06:23:15 EDT --- I am a bit confused about this package, the only file I need from gpxe - bin/undionly.kpxe - is not included at all. As you said default config is Fedora specific, would it make sense to call the package including that config gpxe-fedora instead? I feel a better description text and addition of a README.fedora explaining stuff is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:40:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071140.o07BeSRw022089@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 06:40:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.rpm > SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.spec > Description: > Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal > effort. http://www.sinatrarb.com I'm sorry right links are: Spec URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.spec SRPM URL: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort. http://www.sinatrarb.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:44:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071144.o07BiZ3k014793@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 11:44:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071144.o07Bi0JE022743@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-07 06:43:57 EDT --- [-] Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1907032 > raise child_exception E OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied /usr/lib/python2.6/subprocess.py:1126: OSError ____________________________ skipped test summary _____________________________ /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no jython found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.5 found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_serializer.py:20: [30] Skipped: "can't find a 'python3' executable" /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/py/impl/test/config.py:201: [55] Skipped: "no 'gspecs' value found" /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python3.1 found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_termination.py:46: [1] Skipped: "need 'ps' command to externally check process status" /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.7 found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/testing/test_xspec.py:99: [1] Skipped: 'cpython2.5 not found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no pypy-c found' /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/conftest.py:93: [8] Skipped: 'no python2.4 found' ===================== 1 tests deselected by '-test_info' ====================== ====== 1 failed, 187 passed, 135 skipped, 1 deselected in 13.10 seconds ======= error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rZDWyL (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rZDWyL (%check) RPM build errors: Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target noarch --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-execnet.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 324, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target noarch --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-execnet.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED May you have a look why it failed ? [-] Log file had lot of warnings, which may be of some interest: Log warnings:warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org Log warnings:/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/implnotes.txt:4: (WARNING/2) Literal block expected; none found. Log warnings:preparing documents... /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/example/test_ssh_fileserver.txt:: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree Log warnings:build succeeded, 3 warnings. Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.orig' Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.rej' Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under directory 'execnet' Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found under directory 'execnet' Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under directory 'testing' Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found under directory 'testing' May you check what they mean and can they be ignored. Looks like. Once this is done I will do a detailed review. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:07:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071207.o07C7OYQ029070@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-07 07:07:23 EDT --- No. No review has yet been made. Once you get a sponsor, s/he'll do the formal review on the package (and possibly on the other submissions you may have, too). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:15:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553205] New: Merge Review: perl-Error - Error/exception handling in an OO-ish way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Error - Error/exception handling in an OO-ish way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553205 Summary: Merge Review: perl-Error - Error/exception handling in an OO-ish way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/perl-Error/0.17015/4.fc13/src/perl-Error-0.17015-4.fc13.src.rpm Spec: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/fileinfo?rpmID=1712807&filename=perl-Error.spec Description: The Error package provides two interfaces. Firstly Error provides a procedural interface to exception handling. Secondly Error is a base class for errors/exceptions that can either be thrown, for subsequent catch, or can simply be recorded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:17:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071217.o07CHPtv023853@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 Michal Fojtik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:22:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] New: Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Summary: Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/perl-OpenGL.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/perl-OpenGL-0.62-1.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/watchlogs?taskID=1907403 Description: Perl bindings to implementations of OpenGL and GLUT, providing virtually all of the OpenGL 1.0, and 1.1 functions, and most of 1.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:31:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553210] New: Review Request: nanny - Parental Control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nanny - Parental Control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553210 Summary: Review Request: nanny - Parental Control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/nanny.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/nanny-2.29.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Nanny is an easy way to control what your kids are doing in the computer. You can limit how much time a day each one of them is browsing the web, chatting or doing email. You can decide at which times of the day the can do this things as well. Gnome Nanny filters what web pages are seen by each user, so you can block all undesirable webs and have your kids enjoy the internet. -- There are a few issues as seen via rpmlint that needs to be fixed. I will work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:42:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:42:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071242.o07Cg6hh029510@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 Michal Fojtik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfojtik at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 07:42:02 EDT --- *** Bug 553185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:42:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071242.o07Cg3UB029494@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 Michal Fojtik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 07:42:02 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 504471 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 12:59:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071259.o07CxRIb009483@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-07 07:59:22 EDT --- [x] - Ok, [-] Needs input, [na] - Not Applicable [x] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1907408 - Builds fine [x] rpmlint messages: fine Rpmlint Messages: PyGreSQL.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pg.py 0644 /usr/bin/env PyGreSQL.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pgdb.py 0644 /usr/bin/env Can be ignored [x] Source original Upstream: [rakesh at simu review]$ sha1sum PyGreSQL-3.8.1.tgz 341d14beb99e88f779657db3ce146b41c897f975 PyGreSQL-3.8.1.tgz SRPM: [rakesh at simu review]$ sha1sum PyGreSQL-3.8.1-2.fc13.src/PyGreSQL-3.8.1.tgz 341d14beb99e88f779657db3ce146b41c897f975 PyGreSQL-3.8.1-2.fc13.src/PyGreSQL-3.8.1.tgz [x] Package Name: fine (matches with upstream) [x] License fine (may you just request upstream (yourself ;) to just add a bit explanation in some README file and provide license txt) [x] Spec name fine [x] Spec is legible and written in American English [x] Package successfully builds on primary archs [x] Debuginfo file seems to be fine [x] Permissions of files file [x] All folders which are created are owned correctly [x] Docs are present and appropriately kept [x] Files names in package valid UTF-8 [x] python-devel present [x] provides and obsoletes seem to be fine [-] In python_sitearch definition use %global and not %define (deprecated) [x] Python eggs build from source [x] byte compiled files included Summary: Just check one point with [-]. Everything seems to be fine. Before importing this may you make sure that you have removed PyGreSQL from the postgresql main package and corresponding updated to latest. APPROVED Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 13:40:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071340.o07Deuor011968@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 13:39:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553231] New: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cns11643 - CNS11643 table for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cyrillic.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-cyrillic-1.2.0.20100107-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Cyrillic tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 13:40:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071340.o07DeuQA020448@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #3 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 08:40:50 EDT --- SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-shotgun.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-shotgun-0.4-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 13:47:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071347.o07DlZXO013589@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #4 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 08:47:33 EDT --- SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 13:58:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071358.o07DwIpO018420@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 Michal Fojtik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfojtik at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 08:58:16 EDT --- SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-launchy.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-launchy-0.3.5-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:03:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071403.o07E3MxN027463@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #25 from Tom Lane 2010-01-07 09:03:20 EDT --- Yes, I made the %define->%global change in my local copy yesterday. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:07:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:07:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071407.o07E7DY6028761@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Tom Lane 2010-01-07 09:07:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-pgtcl Short Description: Tcl client library for PostgreSQL Owners: tgl Branches: F-13 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:08:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071408.o07E8xKG029221@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Tom Lane 2010-01-07 09:08:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PyGreSQL Short Description: Python client library for PostgreSQL Owners: tgl Branches: F-13 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:12:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552999] Review Request: curfender - NCurses Defender clone, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071412.o07ECXTP030953@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2010-01-07 09:12:32 EDT --- New release and update that I believe addresses the above. SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/curfender/curfender.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/curfender/curfender-1.01-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:13:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071413.o07EDCPo031100@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2010-01-07 09:13:11 EDT --- Imported and build. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:12:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552999] Review Request: curfender - NCurses sidescroller, with gameplay loosely based on Datastorm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071412.o07ECqCd023333@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552999 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: curfender - |Review Request: curfender - |NCurses Defender clone, |NCurses sidescroller, with |with gameplay loosely based |gameplay loosely based on |on Datastorm |Datastorm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:30:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071430.o07EUZdN028159@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 09:30:34 EDT --- Michal, please mark the japan documentation asi %lang(jp). And no useless comments please: #%{geminstdir}/compat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:29:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071429.o07ETdYC003310@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-07 09:29:37 EDT --- ? rpmlint (see comments at bottom) $ rpmlint -v 2/pyatspi.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name is fine + spec is %{name}.spec + meets packaging guidelines ? meets licensing guidelines X license matches (appears to be only Library GPL v2, and there is no "later version" clause in any of the source files - LGPLv2 without the +?) + COPYING is in %doc + spec is in American English + spec is legible + sources match + builds under mock + no ExcludeArch + build deps listed + no locales + no shared libraries in default paths + doesn't bundle a copy of a system library + not relocatable + directories appear sane + %files doesn't contain duplicates + %files has %defattr + %clean is correct + spec macros used consistently + package contains code + no large docs + %doc files are not required to run + no header files + no static libraries + no pkgconfig files + no libraries listed + no -devel package + no .la files + no gui applications + no duplicate file/dir ownership + %install clears buildroot + filenames are valid utf-8 If I build the package as-is and then run rpmlint on the resulting RPMs, I get: $ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm pyatspi.src: I: checking pyatspi.x86_64: I: checking pyatspi.x86_64: E: no-binary pyatspi-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking pyatspi-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. ... which made me wonder, could we compile this as a noarch rpm? But then I get: $ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm pyatspi.noarch: I: checking pyatspi.noarch: E: noarch-python-in-64bit-path /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pyatspi-dbus.pth I don't know very much about python, or packaging python, but can we do without that pth somehow? Looking at it, perhaps not... although the contents appear to be incorrect: $ cat usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pyatspi-dbus.pth import commands, sys; a = commands.getoutput('gconftool-2 --get /desktop/gnome/interface/at-spi-dbus'); (a == 'true') and sys.path.insert(0, '/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyatspi2') The python bits aren't in that last dir, /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyatspi2 but in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyatspi-dbus/pyatspi Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:34:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071434.o07EYOIv004684@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 09:34:23 EDT --- For the sake of review, I agree with all Michal's changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:34:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071434.o07EYj1X004745@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 09:34:44 EDT --- For the sake of review, I otherwise agree with Michal's changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:35:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071435.o07EZ0EE029892@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 09:34:59 EDT --- For the sake of review, I agree with all Michal's changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 14:50:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071450.o07Eoup3002273@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #7 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-07 09:50:55 EDT --- Fixed. Thank you Lubomir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:12:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071512.o07FCwKc015952@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2010-01-07 10:12:57 EDT --- Hi, I have to admit I do not understand the following comment in the spec file: # We certaion OpenGL calls could not be implemented in our OpenGL # implementation, let us just ignore them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:13:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:13:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] New: Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 Summary: Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sixy at gmx.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng-0.5.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: netsniff-ng is a high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection. Basically, it is similar to tcpdump, but it doesn't need one syscall per packet. Instead, it uses an memory mapped area within kernelspace for accessing packets without copying them to userspace (zero-copy mechanism). This tool is useful for debugging your network, measuring performance throughput or creating network statistics of incoming packets on central network nodes like routers or firewalls. By providing an unix domain socket client, you're able to integrate your statistics into the nagios framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:14:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071514.o07FErsG009083@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #1 from James Findley 2010-01-07 10:14:53 EDT --- Note: First package submitted to fedora, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:14:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548522] Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071514.o07FE8Fb008972@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522 --- Comment #3 from James Laska 2010-01-07 10:14:05 EDT --- Koji scratch-build of autotest-client available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1907647 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:12:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:12:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071512.o07FCK1f008691@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-07 10:12:18 EDT --- The dbus/corba switching mechanism is getting reworked a bit upstream, anyway, see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606251 I'll fix up the license and include the patch from that bug in the next srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:17:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071517.o07FHnEU017182@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2010-01-07 10:17:48 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:18:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071518.o07FI91m017234@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 --- Comment #13 from Jan Zeleny 2010-01-07 10:18:06 EDT --- I have prepared another commit, but first I need to resolve the patch tracking thing. The thing is that the situation is very similar to what you described. Fedora took sources from OpenBSD nc and some patches are there as a result of porting process, so in fact, we kinda have Linux fork of nc. My point here is that describing patches and making tracking bugs for them is IMO an unnecessary work. First reason I already wrote. Then there is the fact, that nc upstream seems to be almost dead, there are only small changes in CVS and they appear like twice a year. There have also been almost no big changes in Fedora version of netcat (rebase didn't appear in last 4 years). And finally - I don't intent to make some major changes in nc. In fact, I'd like to get ncat to Fedora and continue major development there. For now, I want to keep nc and maybe in time it will be appropriate to retire nc entirely. So what do you think - should I really try to track all the patches that haven't been tracked for years or is it ok to skip this step considering my arguments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:32:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071532.o07FWtUG022291@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2010-01-07 10:32:55 EDT --- already packaged for fedora, can I close this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 15:42:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553231] Review Request: ibus-table-cyrillic - Cyrillics tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071542.o07FgB7W018615@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553231 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ibus-table-cns11643 - |ibus-table-cyrillic - |CNS11643 table for |Cyrillics tables for |IBus-Table |IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:09:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:09:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071609.o07G9TVX001249@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 11:09:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Here are some annotationes: > > - Please use the package name as a prefix for the patch/source to avoid > conflicts with other packages in the SOURCES directory Done. > - the patch needs a comment wrt to the upstream status, i.e. was it sent to > upstream or is it upstreamable? Done. (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Lubomir, > > after a short second look I saw that gitolite works without a daemon, so my > question for a init-script is nonsense. > > Would you short discribe me what I have to do to get a testing repository after > I have installed the package. Note that the installation and configuration is a bit weird. There are two ways to install gitolite, traditional and "easy" (remote). Both were adjusted to work with this package. You'll do an easy install like this: Create ~gitolite/.ssh/authorized-keys and add your key there $ gl-easy-install gitolite localhost $LOGNAME The other way to do that would be to su to gitolite user, run "gl-install", follow the instructions and then manually populate the gitolite-admin.git repository (and recompile the configuration, as you'd be instructed). New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gitolite.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gitolite-0.95-2.20091216git.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:15:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071615.o07GF789002901@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 11:15:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, I have to admit I do not understand the following comment in the spec file: > # We certaion OpenGL calls could not be implemented in our OpenGL > # implementation, let us just ignore them. Heh, that's rather weird, sorry. I'll change that to read this in the next package spin (after the rest of the review is done): # Certain OpenGL calls may not be present in our OpenGL # implementation, let us just ignore them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:21:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071621.o07GLR6K030558@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 11:21:27 EDT --- Add this package as an gpxe-fedora subpackage in gpxe proper? BTW: what is the purpose of the fedora specific files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:39:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071639.o07Gdofo002902@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 11:39:43 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:39:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071639.o07GdpwY002915@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Bug 549286 depends on bug 544964, which changed state. Bug 544964 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:54:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553345] Review Request: ibus-table-tv - The Thai and (Viqr) Vietnamese tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071654.o07Gs89C014578@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553345 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:53:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553345] New: Review Request: ibus-table-tv - The Thai and (Viqr) Vietnamese tables for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-tv - The Thai and (Viqr) Vietnamese tables for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553345 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-tv - The Thai and (Viqr) Vietnamese tables for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-tv.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-tv-1.2.0.20100108-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Thai and (Viqr) Vietnamese tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:57:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071657.o07Gv1Z6008903@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 11:57:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > Done! The very next line in the above links says "packages link to libperl.so, > usually to provide embedded perl functionality. All of these packages must also > use the versioned MODULE_COMPAT Requires. " So I think this is needed as well > > Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) - Because none of the binaries in this package are linked against libperl.so and this package does not contain any perl scripts, this Requires is not needed. > > * creating directory under home directory > I have done this by > > %build > %configure --enable-switch_user > rm -rf $HOME/.opendchub > > Is it okay ? - This is still undesired when rebuilding this srpm with usual rpmbuild because this actually removes ~/.opendchub, which may already be used by the user. You should apply a patch against configure.in not to create these directories and call autotools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 16:57:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071657.o07Gv8ec008951@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 11:57:06 EDT --- # Useless, remove %define name netsniff-ng %define version 0.5.4.1 %define release 1 Name: %{name} Version: %{version} Release: %{release}%{?dist} # don't repeat name in summary Summary: netsniff-ng is a high performance network sniffer for packet inspection # not valid License: GPL v2 # use %{version} macro here Source0: http://netsniff-ng.googlecode.com/files/netsniff-ng-0.5.4.1.tar.gz # this is strange, do %setup -q -n %{name}_%{version} %setup -q -n %{name}_%{version}/src %build # add pushd src here make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" # and these are not needed then %{__cp} ../AUTHORS ../Changelog ../COPYING ../CREDITS ../README ../TODO . %{__cp} -R ../examples . %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM BINDIR_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} # add BINDIR="%{_sbindir}" in %build and these will be fixed. mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/sbin/netsniff-ng $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/netsniff-ng %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) # one line is enough %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog .... %doc examples # i would do: # %doc is useless here %doc %{_mandir}/*/* # %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/*.bpf is fine. # you forgot to own %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng and # %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/all_traffic.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/arp.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/atalk.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/broadcast.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/ftp.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/http.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/icmp.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/imap.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/ip_broadcast.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/ip_multicast.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/multicast.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/pop3.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/rarp.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/rsync.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/skype_pre.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/smtp.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/ssh.bpf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/netsniff-ng/rules/vlan1000.bpf %{_sbindir}/netsniff-ng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:11:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071711.o07HBYFI020365@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 12:11:33 EDT --- I have a srpm and spec file available, which is mostly rpmlint clean and adds a init script for daemon mode. Have a look and feel free to use it if you want. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/netsniff-ng/netsniff-ng.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/netsniff-ng/netsniff-ng-0.5.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:10:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071710.o07HAgJp012779@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tbzatek at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom?? B?atek 2010-01-07 12:10:40 EDT --- Uh oh, somebody else did the review meanwhile I was working on it... here are my findings anyway, kinda same as Joshua's :-) source files match upstream: ok package meets naming and versioning guidelines: ok specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: ok dist tag is present: ok build root is correct: ok license field matches the actual license: the spec file says LGPLv2+ while most of the files are LGPLv2-only license is open source-compatible: ok license text included in package: yes latest version is being packaged: ok BuildRequires are proper: yes compiler flags are appropriate: none, ok %clean is present: ok package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): ok debuginfo package looks complete: no, please see below rpmlint is silent: no, please see below final provides and requires look sane: ok no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths: ok, none owns the directories it creates: ok doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: ok no duplicates in %files: ok file permissions are appropriate: ok no scriptlets present: ok documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary: ok %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package: ok libtool archives: none, ok pc files: ok header files: ok static libs: none, ok Notes: - several source files in the 'pyatspi' directory contain portions of code under BSD license - builds fine in koji rpmlint output: pyatspi.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US spi pyatspi.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US spi pyatspi.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US assistive pyatspi.x86_64: E: no-binary pyatspi-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. ignore the spelling errors, but there's another catch: looks like the .pth file is arch dependant (installed in /usr/lib64), we can't use noarch here. The no-binary error is justified, so is the empty-debuginfo-package error. I suggest to add "%global debug_package %{nil}" per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:21:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071721.o07HLV1O015275@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Triaged -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:20:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071720.o07HKnJo022762@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2010-01-07 12:20:48 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is happy bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/perl-OpenGL-0.62-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/perl-OpenGL-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. bradford:rpmbuild$ + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Actually it should be GPLv2 only (not GPLv2+ ... cannot find anywhere "or later"). + GOOD: COPYRIGHT file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5: 905407fa94ca0fc9c1e0ae7c140a4272 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. yes, builds on x86_64/F12 + GOOD: it's noarch so no issues with other architectures. + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK no scripts + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. I don't like this in %files: %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/ Is this correct? Why not just %{perl_vendorlib}/Perl/Tidy.pm + GOOD: A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files are set automatically. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. no .so outside of Perllands + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. no -devel package + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:31:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:31:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071731.o07HVTK3025607@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-07 12:31:27 EDT --- Good review Joshua, thanks. Other: BR/R - tomcat5-jsp-2.0-api and maven2 will bring in tomcat5-servlet-2.4-api, so not strictly needed. Are we causing ourselves trouble by renaming mail.jar -> javamail.jar and dsn.jar -> javamail-dsn.jar? Perhaps just putting them into /usr/share/java/javamail/ ? Is it possible anymore to split out the various sub-packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:29:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071729.o07HTKWk017687@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 12:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Actually rubygem-actionpack is broken with rack 1.1.0 > (bug 552972) I applied a workaround on rawhide actionpack. Now this package itself seems okay, then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:34:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532535] Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071734.o07HY1O6026149@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcheung at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-07 12:33:59 EDT --- *** Bug 231305 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:34:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231305] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071734.o07HY0oB026140@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-07 12:33:59 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 532535 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:42:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532535] Review request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071742.o07HgW4V028404@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532535 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-07 12:42:30 EDT --- Why the commented out bouncycastle BR/R? The URL listed is non-functional, appears to now be: http://santuario.apache.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:49:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071749.o07Hn3Pt021900@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 12:49:02 EDT --- (By the way the macro %ruby_sitelib is used nowhere so this macro definition can be removed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 17:56:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 12:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071756.o07Humqh024257@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 12:56:47 EDT --- Well, actually "rake default" does the same thing as "rake spec", and I applied a workaround on rubygem-actionpack for bug 552972 issue. Now: - Unused %ruby_sitelib macro can be removed Other things are okay ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (rubygem-calendar_date_select) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 18:21:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071821.o07ILsQv006837@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-07 13:21:53 EDT --- Thank you Matej! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-OpenGL Short Description: Perl OpenGL bindings Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 18:39:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071839.o07IdEa5010866@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #4 from James Findley 2010-01-07 13:39:13 EDT --- Ok, I've used your %build and %install sections, and incorporated the other requirements. I've ditched the patch in favour of just putting an %attr tag in the manpage line of %files - nice spot that it was 755, but a patch just to fix that seems overkill. I've also fixed a typo in your initscript, and another in your sysconfig file. spec: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng.spec srpm: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng-0.5.4.1-2.fc12.src.rpm It's still rpmlint clean. Let me know if you find anything else wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 18:46:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071846.o07IkdE9004733@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 13:46:34 EDT --- I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 18:47:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 13:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/=?UTF-8?Q?Gnomecanvasmm=20widget=20for=20=E2=80=9Cboxes=20and=20lines=E2=80=9D=20environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071847.o07Il6Ue013613@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-07 13:47:01 EDT --- I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:02:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071902.o07J2SKR018330@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 14:02:27 EDT --- a) too long lines in %description (> 80) b) mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} c) no need to mark man pages as %doc, done by rpmbuild itself d) I believe it's better to chmod 0644 man page last in %install than using %attr in %files. Better to save %attr for special cases. In all, nice work. Do you have a Fedora account? If not create one, and try to do a koji scratch build and post a koji link (makes it more easy for the reviewer) More info here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji#Scratch_builds_2 koji build --scratch dist-f13 netsniff-ng-0.5.4.1-2.fc12.src.rpm I created the patch so it could be sent upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:29:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071929.o07JTuFA021515@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2010-01-07 14:29:54 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. My review follows. Lines beginning with 'X' need work; lines beginning with '*' are good. I can sponsor you, too. There are just a few small issues and a legal question I have for Fedora Legal. * naming fine (I support the jakarta -> apache change) * builds on x86_64 fine * macros good * %files present and good * rpmlint output okay (ignore the maven fragment issue): $ rpmlint apache-commons-math-2.0-3.fc12.noarch.rpm apache-commons-math-javadoc-2.0-3.fc12.noarch.rpm apache-commons-math.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-math 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. X description too long (drop the Guiding Principles section) X license needs clarification: The license indicates there are some components that came from elsewhere or were derived from other implementation. Spot, can you clarify what the License field should read given the following license text: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=799111 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:40:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071940.o07JeiuT024866@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-07 14:40:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tomcatjss Short Description: A Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) implementation using Java Security Services (JSS) for Tomcat 5.5. Owners: kwright Branches: F-10 F-11, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:51:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001071951.o07JpfaP004280@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #11 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2010-01-07 14:51:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/font-manager-0.4.2-5.fc12.src.rpm > * License is "GPLv3+" Fixed. > * Why are the *.py source files not included Fixed. I patched the upstream Makefile to correct this. The weird thing is that static.py must not be included in the final package, so I cannot make the *.py[co] regexp into *.py* in the Makefile. I found a good regexp for this yesterday but it didn't work in Makefile : install -m 644 !(static).py?(c|o) $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/share/font-manager/ It work fine in a shell but the Makefile didn't like the parenthesis. I have talked about this in #fedora-devel and not found a solution. For the moment, I resign myself to include the name of all the files I want packaged. > and possibly take the chance to compile with -O1 instead of -O0. Maybe there is something I don't understand here (I am kind of new to python) but in the Makefile, I have : @python -OO -m compileall . So, it seems to compile with -O2 if I understand correctly. Am I wrong here? > * The "tmpdir" code in /usr/share/font-manager/export.py* is reason to worry. Like I said before, I am kind of new in python, so I will try to look at this issue in collaboration with upstream. I will come back as soon as I have something on this. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 19:55:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] New: Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 Summary: Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/remmina/remmina.spec SRPM URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/remmina/remmina-0.7.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Remmina is a remote desktop client written in GTK+, aiming to be useful for system administrators and travellers, who need to work with lots of remote computers in front of either large monitors or tiny netbooks. Remmina supports multiple network protocols in an integrated and consistant user interface. Currently RDP, VNC, XDMCP and SSH are supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:01:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072001.o07K17Jp029861@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-07 15:01:05 EDT --- New package: SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi-0.1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi.spec Fixed the license, and got rid off the .pth thing with the new upstream switching approach, which means it can now be noarch. This doesn't yet include Tomas' comments. I'll tackle those in another update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:11:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072011.o07KBIBG009912@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #6 from James Findley 2010-01-07 15:11:17 EDT --- a) fixed that b) oops! those were the lines I shamelessly copied from you! Thanks :) c) didn't know that - updated. d) ok, I've changed that. I have an account but I admit I don't know koji very well (read: at all). koji url: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908133 as it doesn't seem to have the spec outside the srpm, a link to the spec is: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:21:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072021.o07KLIM4012577@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 15:21:17 EDT --- This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red Hat's bugzilla. It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us bugzilla, which is no longer available. I'm not aware of any Fedora procedure which would require that these packages be re-reviewed (though I don't necessarily think that it would be a terrible idea if only the existing review queue weren't so long). Could you indicate just why you believe this needs a re-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:22:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072022.o07KMMG7003844@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roysjosh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-07 15:22:21 EDT --- Some minor nitpicks: You used tabs in the Patch0 line and BuildArch line, but spaces were used everywhere else. Actually, there are both tabs and spaces on the Patch0 line: $ rpmlint pyatspi.spec pyatspi.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 23) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. And the two commented-out lines at the top can be deleted, probably. rpmlint is clean on the built package: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/pyatspi-0.1.4-2.fc13.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Almost there! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:37:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072037.o07KbC8s017730@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 15:37:12 EDT --- we are making progress, thanks for the koji build, its not possible to be a maintainer without basic understanding in koji. Spec file still has %doc %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* Remember to bump the release in %changelog, there are two "-2" lines. Now very pedantic, this is in %changelog too, add an extra space in dates < 10 or add zero padding, change * Thu Jan 7 2010 James Findley - 0.5.4.1-2 to * Thu Jan 7 2010 James Findley - 0.5.4.1-2 or * Thu Jan 07 2010 James Findley - 0.5.4.1-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:40:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072040.o07Ke7ox008674@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #11 from Jay Fenlason 2010-01-07 15:40:04 EDT --- Rawhide now has a sufficiently new libraw1394 (2.0.5-1.fc13) to work with ffado. There's at least a small chance we can get this into f13, if we hurry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:42:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072042.o07KgH14019103@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) | --- Comment #22 from Simon Wesp 2010-01-07 15:42:14 EDT --- Josephine, why do you ping me? Peter has enough informations and hints in this review and he know where he can find the guidelines for further informations... He is provenpackager and should have the skill to finish this, easily; even I made a little mistake in #c10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:42:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072042.o07KgJuS009877@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cassmodiah at fedora | |project.org) | --- Comment #16 from Simon Wesp 2010-01-07 15:42:17 EDT --- What's up, Josephine? This pkg is not ready, Peter didn't follow Mamorus hint. btw, %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas should be marked as %config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:55:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072055.o07Kt3Ix022487@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-07 15:55:01 EDT --- I believe all the issues are fixed and I'm waiting of final sign off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 20:57:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072057.o07KvkiP014445@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-07 15:57:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > What's up, Josephine? This pkg is not ready, Peter didn't follow Mamorus hint. > btw, %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas should be marked as %config Actually the schema files even though they are in /etc are generally not marked as config as you want them updated when you update the package as the gconf schemas can change from version to version and aren't edited. They are not like a blah.conf that might have user changes and hence you don't want overwritten unless it checksums the same as the original one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:02:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072102.o07L2DUi015757@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Jose Pedro Oliveira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt --- Comment #4 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2010-01-07 16:02:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This package was in Extras from before the days before reviews were done in Red > Hat's bugzilla. It was either done on the mailing list or in the fedora.us > bugzilla, which is no longer available. The review was done in Fedora US bugzilla (and most likely by Ville Skytta). The announcement is still available here: * http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-17805.html /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:08:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072108.o07L8Gaf026596@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |commons-jexl - Java |apache-commons-jexl - Java |Expression Language (JEXL) |Expression Language (JEXL) --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-07 16:08:15 EDT --- http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-jexl-1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-jexl.spec * Thu Jan 7 2010 Orion Poplawski - 1.1-2 - Rename to apache-commons-jexl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:21:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072121.o07LLO49020362@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-07 16:21:23 EDT --- Seems good to me, builds in koji too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908228 However, I would split the buildreq line and maybe make Summary say simply Remote Desktop Client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:30:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226187] Merge Review: nc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072130.o07LUqNR022903@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226187 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 16:30:51 EDT --- Honestly I'm not sure what the best course of action would be. The current situation is something we want to get away from; we don't want to be maintaining the source directly inside the Fedora package. We really don't like pointless forking and all the "Fedora doesn't work with upstream" grousing that comes with it, and we've worked very hard to avoid that kind of thing. Stopping short of filing a bunch of upstream tickets for each of our patches, how hard would it be to let upstream know that regardless of what's happened in the past, Fedora would like to reduce or eliminate the current divergence and show them the current set of patches we're carrying? If they reject or ignore the attempt at contact then we can at least get a quick fedorahosted project set up so that there's some public source for what's in this package. Alternately, I'm happy to open a FESCo ticket and ask them for guidance. They could grant an exception, but more likely they'd recommend something not much different than I detail above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:41:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072141.o07LfHtf025731@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:41:16 EDT --- rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:41:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072141.o07LfLF4025755@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.16-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07Lg23A026047@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:42:01 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:43:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072143.o07LhxTc003488@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:43:53 EDT --- chordii-4.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07LkSkG004329@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:46:27 EDT --- chordii-4.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07LgV8U002993@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:42:30 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:41:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072141.o07LfnoN002756@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:41:48 EDT --- clac-004-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:43:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072143.o07Lh402003169@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:43:03 EDT --- clac-004-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07Lgrmp003102@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:42:51 EDT --- vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07Lk7fn027873@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:46:03 EDT --- pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:43:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072143.o07Lh4rC003171@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:43:01 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07LkW3C027963@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.3-1.fc11 |4.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07LjXtg027728@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:45:32 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07LiZOt003659@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:44:33 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:43:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072143.o07Lh86x003193@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|004-1.el5 |004-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07LinKW003701@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:44:47 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07Ljqg3027809@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #69 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:45:46 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07LjQEh027704@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.16-3.fc11 |1.16-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07LjvJ9027832@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.2-5.fc11 |3.1.2-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07LjMRB004092@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:45:21 EDT --- rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07Li3Ro027158@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.3-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07Liedi027302@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.2.1-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07Lg7kp026086@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-4.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07LgafB026250@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-3.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:41:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072141.o07LftwX026010@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |004-1.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:43:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072143.o07Lh9SB026553@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07LkBVU027892@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.2-2.20100104svn.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:45:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072145.o07LjbfD004142@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07LiriG003721@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07LgKjV002907@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:42:19 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mediawiki-LdapAccount'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:42:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072142.o07LgF2q002877@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:42:13 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update orbited'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2010-0030 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:44:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528010] Review Request: PyMca - GUI for multi-channel analyser spectra visualization and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072144.o07LiTr0003628@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528010 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:44:28 EDT --- PyMca-4.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update PyMca'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07Lp3jV029844@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:51:01 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:47:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072147.o07LloOd028761@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:47:48 EDT --- vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LoBBf029611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:50:10 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07LklY2028088@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:46:43 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpSZa029950@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:51:28 EDT --- themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:46:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072146.o07LkpdB028172@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-1.fc10 |1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LopaL006328@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:50:50 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpK5h029917@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 |3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:49:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072149.o07Ln3Ke029038@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:49:01 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07Lo1Rt005844@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:50:00 EDT --- vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LoPE9006226@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:50:24 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpFg9006417@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:51:14 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07Lp8HM029871@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.0-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:49:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072149.o07Ln7Pw029063@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:47:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072147.o07LlOUt028670@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:47:23 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update orbited'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LouUL006356@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-4.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07Lo5N1005868@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.8-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LoFw1006186@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:50:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072150.o07LoT0S006248@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-3.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07LrJl3007359@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:53:18 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpwiT006652@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:51:55 EDT --- f2c-20090411-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:54:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072154.o07LsMhW031201@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:54:20 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07LrURu030994@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:53:30 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07Lr3NZ030900@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:53:02 EDT --- f2c-20090411-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:52:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072152.o07LqYCZ007177@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:52:32 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07LtZiO008178@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:55:35 EDT --- hunspell-mai-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07LrO52007385@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.fc12 |1.3.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07Lt2ve007783@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:55:01 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LuaTY031956@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:35 EDT --- pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20100104svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07Lu3K9008296@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:02 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552154] Review Request: hunspell-mai - Maithili hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07LteP5008199@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552154 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1-1.fc12 |1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LuPAF008382@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:24 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:54:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072154.o07LspxX007732@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #70 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:54:50 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpjwY006604@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:51:44 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07Lu8St031850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.2.1-1.fc11 |0.0.2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LufRD031978@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.2-2.20100104svn.fc12 |4.2-2.20100104svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07LtK6s031669@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:55:19 EDT --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:54:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072154.o07LsurZ007758@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.2-6.fc12 |3.1.2-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LuICF031895@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.1-1.fc11 |3.0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:54:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072154.o07Ls5AC031112@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:54:04 EDT --- pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07Lt6uq007821@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.1-3.fc12 |0.9.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LuThE008409@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-1.fc12 |1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07LrYBD031014@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-3.fc12 |1.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:53:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072153.o07Lr7OC030921@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20090411-5.fc12 |20090411-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LuFdO031873@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:14 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:51:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072151.o07LpoU1030163@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 |3.3.1.20091005-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:52:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072152.o07LqcHp030801@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-3.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07Ltllo031768@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 --- Comment #5 from Peter Halliday 2010-01-07 16:55:42 EDT --- Is there anything else needed from this? I'm wondering if someone else already packages this, because I see this: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/python-virtualenv. I see it hasn't been pushed to EL-5 though, which is what I'm really wanting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:55:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:55:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072155.o07LtPEA031689@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.06-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:54:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072154.o07Ls9gP031140@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.4-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:52:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072152.o07Lq25l030243@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090411-5.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 22:00:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072200.o07M0nIK001066@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #8 from James Findley 2010-01-07 17:00:49 EDT --- ok, fixed the above. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908283 spec: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng.spec Thanks for the help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07Luq7L032145@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:51 EDT --- themonospot-base-0.8.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 21:56:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072156.o07LumWq032082@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 16:56:46 EDT --- orbited-0.7.10-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update orbited'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 22:46:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072246.o07MkgAJ018992@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-07 17:46:40 EDT --- Final version: SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi-0.1.4-3.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:01:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:01:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072301.o07N16YK025262@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #40 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-01-07 18:01:04 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908312 * Wed Jan 7 2010 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.13.RC2 - Updated cron script - Added dspam-front script that will return a proper error code to avoid bounces - Fixed ownership issues of /var/lib/dspam/txt - Checked ownership/permissions of sql scripts - Don't compress sql purge scripts * Fri Dec 18 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.12.RC2 - Bumped upstream version - Fixed requirements to be dspam-libs instead of libdspam * Mon Dec 7 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.11.BETA4 - Renamed libdspam to dspam-libs - Moved docs to -libs package - Added LICENSE file - Fixed some directory ownership issues http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.13.RC2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:03:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072303.o07N3SiU026282@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 18:03:23 EDT --- It appears that I've somehow missed your response. Sorry about that. The latest package builds fine, rpmlint is silent, and it seems that all of my comments have been addressed. APPROVED Sorry for this taking so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:13:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072313.o07NDBh4030248@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 --- Comment #2 from Damien Durand 2010-01-07 18:13:10 EDT --- Ok, it's done :-) SPEC: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/remmina/remmina.spec SRPM: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/remmina/remmina-0.7.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:11:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:11:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072311.o07NBsoG029850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #41 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-01-07 18:11:52 EDT --- I've checked and the odd permissions on /var/lib/dspam in necessary for security purposes. The dspam binary is setgid on purpose. It isn't strictly necessary in *all* ways it can be configured, however the most common ways use that. I'll get more clarification as to what it does setgid vs non setgid methods of operation. We use it on our production servers in that mode. Is there anything else left? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:22:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072322.o07NMMiS001829@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Bug 522207 depends on bug 521989, which changed state. Bug 521989 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Bug 522207 depends on bug 522204, which changed state. Bug 522204 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 18:22:20 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:29:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072329.o07NTVJ9004480@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 18:29:29 EDT --- I seem to have let this fall through the cracks, sorry about that. The current version builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The license of the code seems to be LGPLv3+. LICENSE.txt has the LGPLv3 text, and the source files all seem to have the proper LGPLv3 license block with the "any later version" text, and setup.py says "LGPL". Did I miss something? I don't see any mention of the test suite in your comments, but the test files seem to have disappeared in the latest source so I suppose that's OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:45:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072345.o07NjLZa010761@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 18:45:19 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 7 23:47:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 18:47:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001072347.o07NlCuq012024@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #42 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-01-07 18:47:10 EDT --- %changelog * Wed Jan 7 2010 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.14.RC2 - Updated cron script again - Added README.fedora for fedora specific configuration information http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.14.RC2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 00:07:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080007.o0807PiB018560@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-01-07 19:07:23 EDT --- MUST: + rpmlint output is acceptable. + Package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + Package meets licensing guidelines, and match the source license. + Source files match upstream. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + BuildRoot is proper. + BuildRequires are proper. + Requires are proper. + %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + %clean contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + %doc files present. + %doc files do not interfere runtime application. + Macros are consistently used. + Package builds in koji. + Package contains code or permissible content. + Package installed properly. + No system library is bundled. + Not relocatable, unless proper justification is presented. + %files section must include a %defattr(...) line, and file permissions are correct. + No duplication in %files + File names are in valid UTF-8. + Own all directory it creates. + Files or directories are not owned by other packages. + .so goes in a -devel package if .so.X exists. + No .la libtool archives exists. SHOULD: + License text are in separate files. + Translations for supported non-English languages if available. + Package build in mock. + Package can build in all supported architectures. + Package runs properly. + Scriptlets are sane. + Subpackages Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + No direct files dependencie, unless they are in either /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 00:37:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553483] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-console-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-console-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553483 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-console-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting dogtag-pki-console-ui into fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:02:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553483] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-console-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080102.o0812iXt026001@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553483 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) Depends on|520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) | Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:02:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:02:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553487] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553487 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting pki-console into fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:12:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080112.o081CxUc002264@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-07 20:12:58 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qutim-0.2.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:31:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080131.o081VdQd007040@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-07 20:31:35 EDT --- *** Bug 548877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:31:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:31:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080131.o081VbTu007029@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-07 20:31:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > I'm wondering if someone else already packages this Do you remember your own review bug #519615 ? -> Closing as dub of the original review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 460182 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:37:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:37:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530892] Review Request: kde-style-nitrogen - A KDE 4 widget style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080137.o081bK8k001831@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:40:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:40:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546138] Review Request: Wicd - Wicd is an open source wired and wireless network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080140.o081eZpw002705@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546138 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:39:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511841] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-bad-behavior - Spam prevention plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080139.o081di4h002272@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511841 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:38:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553185] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080138.o081cCME002025@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553185 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:41:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080141.o081fcW2009284@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:37:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: CBFlib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080137.o081bOC6008269@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:40:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538420] Review Request: samtools - Tools for sorting, merging etc. SAM format files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080140.o081esho002853@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538420 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:43:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080143.o081hRk7009661@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 01:48:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530895] Review Request: nitrogen-kwin-theme - A window decoration for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080148.o081mJa2010719@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530895 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:10:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:10:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530003] Review Request: pircbot - Java IRC bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080210.o082A25p016480@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530003 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:12:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080212.o082CcxD017280@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #56 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-07 21:12:33 EDT --- Replying to comment #55: Thanks! I've added a %check to the specfile. I used LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd) rather than LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. as I ran into problems that appeared to occur when a subprocess had changed working directory and could no longer find libpython. See the diff below for more info. Updated specfile: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3.spec Updated SRPM: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-3.1.1-11.fc12.src.rpm Diff: http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python3-from-3.1.1-10-to-3.1.1.11.diff rpmlint output as before (see comment #27, comment #28, and comment #38) Koji scratch build into dist-f13 here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908523 Following up on comment #46: Issues addressed in release 10: > - fixup the factual errors in the comment describing redefinition of >__os_install_post > - cosmetic issue: exec vs find | xargs noted in comment #36 Remaining issues: > - a reviewer needs to go through the full review guidelines on this TODO > - perhaps fixup rpm-build to avoid needing > find-provides-without-python-sonames.sh > - fixup macros.python3 to bake in the definitions, avoid invoking python3 > each time > - verify the script in comment #17 still works and that it verifies the 2 and > 3 packages are independent > - what files are affected when modifying shebangs, and how (see commment #39) > - anything else I've missed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:19:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513731] Review request: berry4all - Utilities to tether Blackberries to Linux. Includes pre-built settings for many major cellular carriers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080219.o082JuEX012097@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513731 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 21:19:54 EDT --- So what's happening with this ticket? There's been no reply to my comments and given comment #8 I'm not sure there's a reason to keep this open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:37:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080237.o082b70M023519@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 21:37:06 EDT --- Any reason for this ticket to remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:42:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080242.o082gB9n019564@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 21:42:09 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this, as it looks like the package ended up being orphaned before it made it into a release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 02:44:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524071] Review Request: lunatic-python - Two-way bridge between Python and Lua In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080244.o082iMDx025035@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524071 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-07 21:44:21 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 03:35:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520017] Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080335.o083ZAj4007983@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520017 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2010-01-07 22:35:09 EDT --- merged into ibus-table-yinma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 03:56:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080356.o083uWWR014438@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #8 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-07 22:56:31 EDT --- I have made the changes. SPEC: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub.spec SRPM: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/opendchub/opendchub-0.8.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 04:06:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080406.o0846FOZ011756@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #7 from Gerd Pokorra 2010-01-07 23:06:14 EDT --- The name of the patch is changed, but not the name of the source-file. I suggest to extend the two lines in the spec-file from # $ make ed2bf5.tar Source0: ed2bf5.tar to # $ make ed2bf5.tar # $ mv ed2bf5.tar gitolite-%{version}.tar # $ gzip -9 gitolite-%{version}.tar Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 04:15:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080415.o084Fvoh014408@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #24 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-07 23:15:55 EDT --- Sorry, but there are definitely blockers left: - the unversioned libs in /usr/lib64/ethos/plugin-loaders/ belong into the devel package, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Devel_Packages - using %{_libdir}/python2.6/ in the files section is a no-go. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture for how to do this properly. - vala package should be noarch as it contains no arch dependent files (In reply to comment #18) > > (In reply to comment #15) > > > What owns/provides /usr/share/gir-1.0/? Make sure the dir is not unowned. > > It should be this package that owns it. > > > gobject-introspection-devel-0:0.6.7-1.fc13.i686 Then you need the devel package require gobject-introspection-devel for directory ownership. Currently the requirements autogenerated from the pkconfig files only include pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) This means that only glib2-devel and gtk2-devel are pulled in. And even if we had pkgconfig(introspection-1.0.pc) I'd still prefer requiring gobject-introspection-devel because all this stuff only works with newer versions of rpm. There are more potentially unowned dirs: - doc package puts files into %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html, so it needs to require gtk-doc - python package puts files into %{python_sitearch}/gtk-2.0 (sic!) and needs to require pygtk2 - python package puts files into %{_datadir}/pygtk/2.0/defs and needs to require gnome-python2 - vala package puts files into %{_datadir}/vala/vapi and needs to require vala Other questions: - Why is there a doc package anway? Usually gtk-doc is part of the devel package. People who don't want the docs can still install it with --excludedocs. - Should %{_libdir}/ethos/plugin-loaders/libpythonloader.so be part of the python package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 04:35:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080435.o084ZPll019331@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #25 from Christoph Wickert 2010-01-07 23:35:24 EDT --- The following are for Simon and Joesphine. They are of educational nature and not really related to the review: (In reply to comment #3) > The README file? Please look in the COPYING. This is the file to figure out the > correct license. Never (only) rely on a COPYING file, look into header of the sources instead. How would you destinguish between LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+ here by only looking at COPYING? (In reply to comment #10) > %{python_sitelib}/gtk-*/_%{name}.so > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python > > you should use %{name} instead of the name and you should use the "*" instead > of version numbers. It's easier for an mass rebuild; like a pygtk update. for > example the new path will be gkt-3.0 your specfile is valid for this and it is > nor required to edit it. I fully agree on %{python_sitelib}, but the rest is questionable: Using %{name} hardly adds any benefit. It only makes sense if Peter maintains lots of packages with similar specs, so he can copy & paste stuff there. Using a wildcard for the gtk version also doesn't add benefit. Once gtk3 lands this package definitely needs more than a scripted rebuild, it needs a new version. This version is supposed to work with gtk2, and different gtk major versions can be installed in parallel, so using gtk-2.0 is more sane and more obvious when you look at the spec. (In reply to comment #16) > The directory %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ and all files/directories/etc > under this are automatically marked as %doc (check > $ rpm --eval %__docdir_path and /usr/lib/rpm/macros ) Of course Mamoru is right, but I still prefer marking this explicitly. I wanted to point out that it's important to check that files are correctly marked as %doc or %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 04:41:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080441.o084fSij026044@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #8 from Gerd Pokorra 2010-01-07 23:41:27 EDT --- I tried gitolite from the git. The command to clone the "testing" repository works with: $ git clone gitolite:testing.git but using the username and hostname $ git clone @:testing.git again2 gives out the following error: Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gz016/gitolite/testing/again2/.git/ fatal: 'testing.git': unable to chdir or not a git archive fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly [gz016 at hilton testing]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 06:24:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080624.o086O1T5010969@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 06:23:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080623.o086NjOF010903@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #18 from Lucian Langa 2010-01-08 01:23:44 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: simh Short Description: A highly portable, multi-system emulator Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 06:50:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553533] Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080650.o086o3Lu023844@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 06:49:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553533] New: Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553533 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-code - The code tables for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-code.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/ibus-table-code-1.2.0.20100108-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The code tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 07:17:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552819] Merge Review: perl-Tie-IxHash - Ordered associative arrays for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080717.o087H4pp024232@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552819 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-08 02:17:03 EDT --- Thank you, I wasn't aware about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 07:22:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539873] netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080722.o087MBbW025435@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539873 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 02:22:10 EDT --- Still no SRPM, and both spec URLs have been invalid for some time. Marking as NotReady; I guess I'll close this soon unless something we can actually review appears. If you do want to submit these packages, please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers, file a proper review ticket for each package, and also request hosting (as indicated in that document) so that you can have a proper place to put the spec and srpm files. Pastebin just won't do for obvious reasons, and we do also require that you provide an SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 07:38:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080738.o087caTZ029938@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 02:38:32 EDT --- [x] - Ok, [-] Needs input, [na] - Not Applicable [x] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908693 - Builds fine [x] rpmlint complains about patch not applied udav.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: udav-help-path.patch ignore as you are moving in tmp and doing some sed and applying it. [-] License: what is license of png files ? May you confirm from upstream ? There are few svg files in template folder also ? Why are they used for ? What are pascal files in that folder for ? License field says license is GPLv2 but src files say it could be later also so correct license field should be GPLv2+ and license of picture files ? May you investiagete here and contact upstream to clearly mention the license information in readme files or some place. [x] Name fine [x] spec name file [x] optflags usage fine [-] short name for icon does not need extension so change it to 'Icon=udav' (png is assumed by default) value "udav.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path [-] key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated [-] desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/foo.desktop run this in spec and you can get warnings easily [x] symlink uses absolute path [-] Check with upstream about patches. One of them seems to be fedora specific mention that in spec file. Provide necessary reference to your interaction with upstream also if possible. Have you also reported about inclusion of desktop file in upstream code base ? [x] all folders owned by package [x] timestamps are being saved [x] source is from upstream 5d857ded986d65613d8a0f5d482ea33baf30f1b1 (sha1sum matches) [x] use example_mgl_eng.html in docs [-] man page does seem to be included, it is present in udav [-] Why are you not installing icons in %{_datadir}/icons/ and using icon cache ? [x] spec file is in american english and legible [x] debuginfo file is fine [x] successfully compiles on primary archs [x] BR fine [na] no locales [x] %file section seems to be ok [x] valid file names May you have a look at issues I mentioned ? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 07:42:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 02:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080742.o087gIVs030818@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 02:42:14 EDT --- Not sure why I didn't see your reply, but here's mine, two months late. Sorry about that. Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:02:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080802.o0882e1O009657@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(astokes at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:02:22 EDT --- Hi Adam, There has been no response for long. May you answer comment #4 and comment #5 soon ? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:15:26 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488962] Review Request: app-install - Tools for managing application install data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080815.o088FQtx006816@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:15:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488962] Review Request: app-install - Tools for managing application install data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080815.o088FHKI006790@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:15:16 EDT --- ugg sorry for messing it up. I need some sleep. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:15:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:15:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544531] Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080815.o088F0VL006473@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 03:14:59 EDT --- Hello. Here are some notes: * Build / Mock - Your srpm does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908068 You can use "mock" to check if your srpm actually builds within a "clean" buildroot: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks Some notes: - source code actually requires "libXaw-devel" header files, not "Xaw3d-devel", based on the current location of the header files - Also "BR (BuildRequires): libXtst-devel" is missing - By default this installs some file under /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults, even on 64 bit architecture. This causes build failure on x86_64 (for example) because even with the following line -------------------------------------------------------------- %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/X11/app-defaults -------------------------------------------------------------- this cannot be deleted because on x86_64 %_libdir is expanded as /usr/lib64. I had to add "LIBDIR=%{_libdir}/X11" option to "make install" - Installed "normal" files should have 0644 permission, not 0444 permission. Modifying Makefile directly like ------------------------------------------------------------- %{__sed} -i.mode -e 's|-m 0444|-m 0644|' Makefile ------------------------------------------------------------- after xmkmf is simpler. - Please keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands add "-p" option - Also please consider to add 'INSTALLFLAGS="-c -p"' to "make install" * Source2 - Would you write how you obtained Source2? * Macros - Why do you also use %_datarootdir as well as %_datadir ? * Desktop file - "fedora-" prefix on the name is no longer needed. - "Application" in Categories is deprecated and should be removed. * %changelog - It is preferable (especially when using Fedora CVS system) to insert one line between each %changelog entry like: -------------------------------------------------------------- %changelog * Sat Dec 5 2009 Akio Idehara 3.0-2 - Add Desktop files * Sat Dec 5 2009 Akio Idehara 3.0-1 - Initial RPM release -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:12:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080812.o088CHtC011867@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #28 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:12:14 EDT --- *** Bug 488962 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:12:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488962] Review Request: app-install - Tools for managing application install data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080812.o088CFHD011849@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488962 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:12:14 EDT --- Marking it as a duplicate of fedora data review bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 488968 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:24:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518892] Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080824.o088OpNc014926@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:24:50 EDT --- [x] - Ok, [-] Needs input, [na] - Not Applicable [x] Fails to build. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908750 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1908752&name=build.log has more info May you fix the build and then I can start review in more detail. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:38:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:38:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080838.o088cMwu013029@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-08 03:38:20 EDT --- Hi Gerd, (In reply to comment #7) > The name of the patch is changed, but not the name of the source-file. > > I suggest to extend the two lines in the spec-file from > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > Source0: ed2bf5.tar > > to > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > # $ mv ed2bf5.tar gitolite-%{version}.tar > # $ gzip -9 gitolite-%{version}.tar > Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Umm, that was an upstream decision (the file name), we don't usually rename upstream tarballs and I'm reluctant to do so. (In reply to comment #8) > I tried gitolite from the git. The command to clone the "testing" repository > works > with: > > $ git clone gitolite:testing.git > > but using the username and hostname > > $ git clone @:testing.git again2 > > gives out the following error: > > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/gz016/gitolite/testing/again2/.git/ > fatal: 'testing.git': unable to chdir or not a git archive > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly > [gz016 at hilton testing]$ The above is always "gitolite". Gitolite doesn't use UNIX users/permissions to implement access control, it implements its own and determines the user name from the key used. Therefore, after initial checkout of gitolite-admin, add your key there, push back and you should be able to access the repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 08:36:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 03:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524257] Review Request: Sympa - An electronic mailing list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080836.o088ajZi018753@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524257 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 03:36:43 EDT --- May you move to 6.0.1 and address issues mentioned in comment #6. As soon as you do that I will do a detailed review. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 09:09:40 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538820] Review Request: roboptim-core - Numerical optimization for robotics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080909.o0899eBZ021065@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538820 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 04:09:38 EDT --- Some notes: * SourceURL - For sourceforge hosted tarball, please use: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net By the way while I could download a tarball from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/roboptim/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz , ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the one I could download differs from the tarball in your srpm: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 498194 2009-11-17 21:53 original/roboptim-core-0.4.tar.gz 498224 2009-11-17 02:21 roboptim-core-0.4-1.fc11.src/roboptim-core-0.4.tar.gz ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires - "Requires: pkgconfig" on -devel package is no longer needed (on Fedora, not on EPEL) because Fedora rpmbuild automatically detects this dependency. - Requires: roboptim-core = %{version}-%{release} can be replaced with Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - As -devel subpackage contains the following files (for example) /usr/include/roboptim/core/function.hh: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 28 # include 29 # include 30 # include ---------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/include/roboptim/core/solver-factory.hh ---------------------------------------------------------------- 26 # include ---------------------------------------------------------------- -devel subpackage should have "Requires: boost-devel" and "Requires: libtool-ltdl-devel" (here I am not saying about BuildRequires). ? pkgconfig file - By the way you specify configure option: ---------------------------------------------------------------- --docdir=%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} ---------------------------------------------------------------- Does this mean that you have to modify docdir & doxygendocdir in build-aux/pkg-config.pc.in (and the installed roboptim-core.pc) ? * Non-library in %_libdir - What is the file "roboptim-core-dummy-plugin.so.1" in %_libdir? This file does not have the name "libXXXX.so.Y", so this does not seem to be a system-wide library, and this should be moved to some subdirectory under %_libdir (like %_libdir/%name). ! Note the reason rpmlint warns about "dangling-relative-symlink" on -devel package is because "roboptim-core-dummy-plugin.so.1" is not regarded as a library (because this file does not have the name libXXXX.so.Y) ( you can see that actually rpmlint does not show this waring on libroboptim-core.so ) * Timestamps - Please consider to use ----------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ----------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * About -doc subpackage - Currently only 5 files (AUTHORS COPYING THANKS README NEWS) are included in the -doc subpackage and I guess this is not what you expect. ! Note With the following lines ---------------------------------------------------------------- 64 %files 65 %defattr(-,root,root,-) 66 %doc AUTHORS COPYING THANKS README NEWS ---------------------------------------------------------------- rpmbuild - Firstly clean up the directory %buildroot%_docdir/%name-%version - Then again create the directory %buildroot%_docdir/%name-%version - and installs the files specified in %doc to this directory (please check build.log what is actually done by rpmbuild) Also please check if needed BuildRequies are correctly written. build.log says: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 336 make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. 337 ../config.status --file="Doxyfile.extra":"Doxyfile.extra.in" 338 config.status: creating Doxyfile.extra 339 config.status: creating Doxyfile 340 sh: latex: command not found 341 sh: dvips: command not found 342 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/roboptim-core-0.4/doc' ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 09:20:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080920.o089Ksld027156@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 04:20:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > I suggest to extend the two lines in the spec-file from > > > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > > Source0: ed2bf5.tar > > > > to > > > > # $ make ed2bf5.tar > > # $ mv ed2bf5.tar gitolite-%{version}.tar > > # $ gzip -9 gitolite-%{version}.tar > > Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > Umm, that was an upstream decision (the file name), we don't usually rename > upstream tarballs and I'm reluctant to do so. Fedora already has guidelines for creating source tarball based on the upstream VCS: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control i.e. tarball name must begin with %{name}- in this case, and the tarball should contain the information about version, revision, etc in its name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 09:39:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080939.o089dPuc031924@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-01-08 04:39:24 EDT --- No problem, thanks for looking at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 09:40:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 04:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001080940.o089eW4Y032378@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-01-08 04:40:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-bin-prot Short Description: Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol Owners: rjones Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:02:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081002.o08A2qap005244@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-08 05:02:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Fedora already has guidelines for creating source tarball > based on the upstream VCS: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Thank you, I did not know. I will fix this up upon next package spin (when the full review is done). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:25:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081025.o08APYfA011293@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Moschny 2010-01-08 05:25:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet-1.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jan 7 2010 Thomas Moschny - 1.0.2-2 - Skip tests that need network access. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908811 (In reply to comment #4) > [-] Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1907032 > > > raise child_exception > E OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied > /usr/lib/python2.6/subprocess.py:1126: OSError > [...] > May you have a look why it failed ? That was a test failing while trying to connect to localhost via ssh, which can't work on koji. It is skipped now. > [-] Log file had lot of warnings, which may be of some interest: > > Log warnings:warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: > x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org That's quite normal, all builds show this for srpm generation. > Log warnings:/builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/implnotes.txt:4: > (WARNING/2) Literal block expected; none found. > Log warnings:preparing documents... > /builddir/build/BUILD/execnet-1.0.2/doc/example/test_ssh_fileserver.txt:: > WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree > Log warnings:build succeeded, 3 warnings. These warnings are emitted while building the documentation. Will ask upstream about them. > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.orig' > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files found matching '*.rej' > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under > directory 'execnet' > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found > under directory 'execnet' > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*.pyc' found under > directory 'testing' > Log warnings:warning: no previously-included files matching '*$py.class' found > under directory 'testing' Completely harmless. The manifest file excludes some files that are not present in the tarball, but might be in a developer's home. > May you check what they mean and can they be ignored. Looks like. > > Once this is done I will do a detailed review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:42:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532276] Review Request: python-googlevoice - Python language bindings for the Google Voice API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081042.o08AgwWe016002@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532276 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 05:42:55 EDT --- [x] - Ok, [-] Needs input, [na] - Not Applicable [-] Update to latest That will include rename docs to doc and including: /usr/bin/asterisk-gvoice-setup /usr/bin/gvi in %files section [x] name fine [x] spec file name fine [x] egg files are getting generated [x] python-setuptools-devel included [x] rpmlint is happy [x] docs and examples are included [-] license fine, but neither source nor license copy present. May you tell upstream to mention about it some place in source tarball also and if possible in source files. BSD is okay. [x] byte compiled files included [x] source ok 835f3631192fa586341ac3da8b847812d5fd4cf1 pygooglevoice-0.4.tar.gz 4a1f19313812d4cc078e39ac9f40e9b4ab8ed432 pygooglevoice-0.4-extras.zip sha1sum matches [x] spec fields fine [x] %files section and permissions fine [x] American english and spec legible [x] File names in package valid UTF-8 [x] permissions file Summary: May you inform upstream about license bits and update the package to latest. Everything else seems to be fine. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:44:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553281] Review Request: netsniff-ng - high performance linux network sniffer for packet inspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081044.o08AiYj4020591@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553281 --- Comment #9 from James Findley 2010-01-08 05:44:32 EDT --- I noticed that gcc was throwing warnings on AMD64 builds, due to print %llu with a uint64_t var, and so added a -Wno-format to supress these, as they should be completely harmless. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908813 spec: http://sixy.myzen.co.uk/netsniff-ng.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:55:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530374] Review Request: nitrogen - A background browser and setter for X windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081055.o08AtIXf019258@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530374 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 05:55:16 EDT --- ping, It has been month today. Is there any update on this Sandro? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 10:56:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081056.o08Autni023737@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 05:56:52 EDT --- ping Tejas, Any updates on this one ? It has been 2-3 months with no update. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 11:10:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 06:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081110.o08BAH3U027071@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-01-08 06:10:15 EDT --- The problem with the sub-packages is: the parent pom.xml does some sort of maven magic with the "bundle" plugin that's beyond me, and that seems to make use of the maven osgiversion plugin which isn't yet available on Fedora. The intended build sequence appears to be: compile everything and bundle it into mail.jar, and then also extract classes from that into sub-packages (e.g., com.sun.mail.imap.* into imap.jar). I asked about this on the upstream forum and that's what the developer said: http://kenai.com/projects/javamail/forums/forum/topics/2084-Where-is-the-source-for-imap-pop3-smtp-mailapi- However, when I remove all of the unavailable plugins and try to build the sub-packages, every sub-jar just ends up containing all of the classes from mail.jar all over again. The "dsn" sub-package is fine because its source files are actually included separately, unlike the other ones. I could just manually build the other jar files by running "jar" myself, I guess ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 11:44:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 06:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532534] Review request: xml-im-exporter - XML Im-/Exporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081144.o08Bi4tm003609@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532534 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Such? 2010-01-08 06:44:02 EDT --- ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Java specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86 [x] Rpmlint output: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root although FG prefer: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. see comment [1] [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5sum xml-im-exporter1.1.tgz xml-im-exporter1.1.tgz.orig d39a2857420754bb71cbec0e737c8a72 xml-im-exporter1.1.tgz d39a2857420754bb71cbec0e737c8a72 xml-im-exporter1.1.tgz.orig [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -fR $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji scratch build [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [!] %check is present and the tests pass Need to be fixed: In spec is: License: LGPLv2+ but according to Copying.txt and web site only version 1.0 is licensed under LGPL2. Version 1.1 is licensed as BSD. Optionaly (not needed for review) - change buildroot - fix tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 12:19:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553606] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-birthday-reminder - Birthday Reminder Plasmoid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-birthday-reminder - Birthday Reminder Plasmoid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553606 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-birthday-reminder - Birthday Reminder Plasmoid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kde-plasma-birthday-reminder.spec SRPM URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kde-plasma-birthday-reminder-0.9.72-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Plasmoid reminding you at birthdays and anniversaries of contacts in the (standard) KDE address book. Inspired by the KDE3 kicker applet KBirthday from Jan Hambrecht. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 12:49:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553615] New: Review Request: Ailurus - "Install software" + "Configure Linux" + "Study Linux skills" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Ailurus - "Install software" + "Configure Linux" + "Study Linux skills" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553615 Summary: Review Request: Ailurus - "Install software" + "Configure Linux" + "Study Linux skills" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: homer.xing at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://ailurus.googlecode.com/files/ailurus.spec SRPM URL: http://ailurus.googlecode.com/files/ailurus-10.01.1-1.src.rpm Description: Ailurus provides following functionality. * Display information about BIOS, motherboard, CPU and battery. * Change some GNOME settings. * Install/remove some nice applications which are not provided in the official repository. * Tell you some Linux skills. * Enable/disable some third party repositories. * From package maintainers wishlist - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#A-D * rpmlint - clean on spec and rpms * Koji build successfully - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1908922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 13:30:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081330.o08DUHOh027476@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2010-01-08 08:30:14 EDT --- Updated to new upstream version: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lcgdm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lcgdm-1.7.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 13:46:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081346.o08DkUXf032335@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2010-01-08 08:46:28 EDT --- [x] - Ok, [-] Needs input, [na] - Not Applicable [-]/usr/share/doc/python-execnet-1.0.2/html/.buildinfo remove this file. [x] Builds fine [x] name seems fine [x] spec name fine [x] rpmlint fine, few messages can be safly ignored [x] version, release, summary, License, BRs seem to be fine [x] source ok md5 b3a42aec448ede3ba573cb6c6d00a20b [x] test check ok [x] egg generated [x] py(oc) files [x] successfully builds [x] uft-8 file names [x] american english and legible [x] description and summary ok [x] no gui, no libs, [x] works fine Just remove the file .buildinfo . APPROVED Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 14:19:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081419.o08EJqAl014551@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Thomas Moschny 2010-01-08 09:19:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-execnet Short Description: Elastic Python Deployment Owners: thm Branches: F-12 InitialCC: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 14:40:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553649] New: Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines Alias: rhn-custom-info https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553649 Summary: Review Request: rhn-custom-info - Set and list custom values for RHN-enabled machines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhn-custom-info/rhn-custom-info-5.4.1-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhn-custom-info/rhn-custom-info.spec Description: Allows for the setting and listing of custom key/value pairs for an RHN-enabled system. rpmlint /tmp/spacewalk-build/rpmbuild-rhn-custom-info-5.4.1-1/noarch/rhn-custom-info-5.4.1-1.noarch.rpm rhn-custom-info.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency rhnlib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Which should be safe since rhnlib is not classic lib. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1909325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 14:50:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081450.o08EoDdY018012@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-08 09:50:12 EDT --- * Named correctly * Version correct * Source matches upstream * Spec file clean, legible, American english * RPMlint silent * Builds in mock * Filelist sane * Requires/provides sane * Scritplets fine * Uses compiler flags correctly Needs work: 1.) License 3des.* files lack licensing information (you may want to find other software that includes this to clarify licensing, or use an existing library for tripple DES encryption) zywrletemplate.c This looks like a BSD license, not GPL keysym.h MIT license? 2.) Embedded copies of libraries Please look into possibility of using existing vnc library present in Fedora instead of libvncserver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:22:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:22:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081522.o08FMMM4027021@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 10:22:18 EDT --- Thanks for the explanation, no need to go through heroics. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:28:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081528.o08FSTJh028543@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #8 from Klaus Grue 2010-01-08 10:28:27 EDT --- Version 0.2.6 is out. The new version is here: Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb-0.2.6-1.fc11.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Furthermore, Version 0.1.10 is out. Version 0.1.10 is here: HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/0.1/index.html Tar ball: http://logiweb.eu/0.1/logiweb-0.1.10.tar.gz Version 0.2.6 contains the lgc compiler expressed in the compilers own language. Version 0.1.10 contains the lgc compiler expressed in CLISP. Thus, Version 0.1.10 can be used for bootstrapping. Version 0.1.10 addresses the issue in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines Section 1.4: No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries Section 1.4.1: Exceptions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:26:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081526.o08FQhwp028234@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 --- Comment #6 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-08 10:26:41 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. There is no headers. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:30:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081530.o08FUOoS002522@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-08 10:30:23 EDT --- Should Xephyr be added as req? In testing I did not find any SSH options, bug or feature? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:35:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081535.o08FZrHd003941@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #6 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-08 10:35:53 EDT --- Fixed revision number in SRPM: SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-shotgun.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-shotgun-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:36:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081536.o08FaXMc004077@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 --- Comment #7 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-08 10:36:32 EDT --- Fixed revision number: SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-launchy.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-launchy-0.3.5-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:33:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081533.o08FXTuq003246@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #5 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-08 10:33:27 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i rubygem-shotgun-0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . MIT # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. No headers. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:38:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081538.o08FcEXc030989@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #5 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-08 10:38:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2.) Embedded copies of libraries > > Please look into possibility of using existing vnc library present in Fedora > instead of libvncserver. According to the file configure.ac provided with the source, this will enable the use of external vnc: %configure --enable-vnc=dl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:38:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081538.o08FcfoS031082@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #8 from Michal Fojtik 2010-01-08 10:38:40 EDT --- Fixed rev number in SRPM: SPEC: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra.spec SRPM: http://mifo.sk/rubygem-sinatra-0.10.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Review: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . MIT # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. No headers. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:40:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081540.o08FedT2005180@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 --- Comment #6 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-08 10:40:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Should Xephyr be added as req? > > In testing I did not find any SSH options, bug or feature? It seems that to enable it, remmina needs to be compiled with libssh >= 0.4, whereas Fedora <= 12 only provides 0.2 (but rawhide has 0.4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:46:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081546.o08Fki91001630@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 Alain PORTAL changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Alain PORTAL 2010-01-08 10:46:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kbackup New Branches: F-11 F-12 Owners: dionysos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:56:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081556.o08FuTQ2009827@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-01-08 10:56:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: javamail Short Description: Java Mail API Owners: mef Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:57:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552253] Merge Review: perl-Test-MockObject - Perl extension for emulating troublesome interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081557.o08FvHx7004494@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552253 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2010-01-08 10:57:16 EDT --- Maybe we can use this old review http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-18039.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 15:58:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081558.o08Fwm0i010540@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 --- Comment #6 from Mary Ellen Foster 2010-01-08 10:58:47 EDT --- For posterity, I'll note that I've made a couple of small changes to the original package based on the review comments: - Removed the unnecessary (build)requirement for tomcat-servlet-2.4-api - Put the jar files into a "javamail" subdirectory Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/javamail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/javamail-1.4.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:00:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081600.o08G0jsd011202@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-08 11:00:43 EDT --- Should be: License: ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and BSD (Breakdown: Main license: ASL 2.0 minpack: ASL 1.1 odex: BSD (2 clause) lapack, mersenne: BSD (3 clause, without advertising) Lifting FE-Legal, please be sure to update License tag before approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:03:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081603.o08G3965012013@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-08 11:03:07 EDT --- This should not be a problem, as I do not see anything in those repos which are legally questionable. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:14:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081614.o08GEphU015312@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-08 11:14:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I am a bit confused about this package, the only file I need from > gpxe - bin/undionly.kpxe - is not included at all. > I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that file was actually valuable. > As you said default config is Fedora specific, would it make sense to > call the package including that config gpxe-fedora instead? > In that case, the gpxe package itself would basically be empty. I'm not objecting, but it would mean that for the gpxe package itself to be any good it would maybe also need to require the -fedora sub-package? > I feel a better description text and addition of a README.fedora explaining > stuff is needed. Sure, any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:18:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081618.o08GI54u016266@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-08 11:18:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > already packaged for fedora, can I close this bug ? (In reply to comment #5) > Add this package as an gpxe-fedora subpackage in gpxe proper? > > BTW: what is the purpose of the fedora specific files? Fedora Infrastructure is attempting to provide a Fedora composed gPXE version to be included in the normal releases, making use of the HTTP boot capabilities. I realize now that a more appropriate name for this package would be gpxe-fedora, and I'll update the package / review request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:22:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081622.o08GMhfL018131@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2010-01-08 11:22:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) ok, like boot.kernel.org I will review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:23:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227061] Review Request: isorelax-0.1-0.20041111.2jpp - Public interfaces useful for applications to support RELAX Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081623.o08GNs6B018359@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227061 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dbhole at redhat.com, | |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 11:23:50 EDT --- This builds in EL-5 - could we get a branch there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:28:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227112] Review Request: relaxngDatatype-1.0-3jpp - RELAX NG Datatype API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081628.o08GSbof013245@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227112 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 11:28:34 EDT --- This builds on EL-5, could we get a branch there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:27:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:27:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081627.o08GR7pp019447@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 --- Comment #8 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2010-01-08 11:27:06 EDT --- Thanks for these comments and reviews. This new version takes into account all of them: Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/apache-commons-math/apache-commons-math.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/apache-commons-math/apache-commons-math-2.0-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:32:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: apache-commons-math - Java library of lightweight mathematics and statistics components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081632.o08GWr5I014587@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Andrew Overholt 2010-01-08 11:32:52 EDT --- This package is approved. Thanks, spot and Mohamed. Mohamed, please be sure to go through the appropriate steps to request sponsorship in the packager group. I will get an email when you've requested it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:34:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227117] Review Request: tagsoup-1.0.1-1jpp - A SAX-compliant parser written in Java that parses HTML as it is found in the wild: nasty and brutish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081634.o08GYGvt021207@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227117 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 11:34:12 EDT --- This builds in EL-5, could we get a branch made for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:45:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553683] New: Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683 Summary: Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thomasj at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/luckybackup.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/luckybackup-0.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: luckyBackup is an application that backs-up and/or synchronizes any directories with the power of rsync. It is simple to use, fast (transfers over only changes made and not all data), safe (keeps your data safe by checking all declared directories before proceeding in any data manipulation ), reliable and fully customizable. [thomas at tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint luckybackup.spec ../SRPMS/luckybackup-0.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/luckybackup-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:43:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081643.o08GhNPe023923@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 11:43:22 EDT --- John - do you want to update the the jets3t package and then I'll take a look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:53:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081653.o08GrqVZ020764@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:52:29 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081652.o08GqT5c020444@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 --- Comment #3 from Marek Grac 2010-01-08 11:52:27 EDT --- New build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1909778 all errors removed, warnings with symlinks still remains. Author of send_arp.c was contacted and he wrote that he already give permission to use it under BSD + GPL licenses. I will create a new upstream version with correct licensing + incorporated patches. Please let me know if there are any other problems with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:54:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544531] Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081654.o08GsuGW020965@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 --- Comment #4 from Akio Idehara 2010-01-08 11:54:54 EDT --- Hello Tasaka-san. Thank you for a lot of comments! The following is new version that fixes above bugs. But I don't have 64-bit target, so I can't test it. ---------- Spec URL: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/xvkbd-fedora/downloads/45354/xvkbd.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.jp/projects/xvkbd-fedora/downloads/45355/xvkbd-3.0-3.fc12.src.rpm ---------- And I have one question about INSTALLFLAGS. "man install" says that "-c" option is ignored. So why I need to set the "-c" option in INSTALLFLAGS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 16:53:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081653.o08GrYfF020704@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 11:53:31 EDT --- For -0.14: * -n specification - For example "%package -n dspam-libs" can simply be "%package libs" (and the latter form is commonly used). Another example is that "%post -n dspam-libs -p /sbin/ldconfig" can simply be "%post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig". * Directory ownership issue - This time the following directories are not owned by any packages: --------------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Again owner/group/permission (In reply to comment #41) > I've checked and the odd permissions on /var/lib/dspam in necessary for > security purposes. > > The dspam binary is setgid on purpose. It isn't strictly necessary in *all* > ways it can be configured, however the most common ways use that. I'll get more > clarification as to what it does setgid vs non setgid methods of operation. We > use it on our production servers in that mode. - To be clear, what I am said is that currently the group of /usr/bin/dspam is root and I guess this is wrong when this binary has setgid, because with this setgid/group executing /usr/bin/dspam is always done with root group. build.log says: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 826 if test x"nobody" != xnone; then \ 827 chown "nobody" /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.14.RC2.i386/usr/bin/dspam; \ 828 fi 829 chown: changing ownership of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.14.RC2.i386/usr/bin/dspam': Operation not permitted 831 if test x"mail" != xnone; then \ 832 chgrp "mail" /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.14.RC2.i386/usr/bin/dspam; \ 833 fi 834 chgrp: changing group of `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dspam-3.9.0-0.14.RC2.i386/usr/bin/dspam': Operation not permitted --------------------------------------------------------------------- So I guess /usr/bin/dspam should have %attr(2511,nobody,mail). Would you again check permission/owner/group of all files/directories? ! Note - Also, for binaries/directories which have some special permission/group/owner, you should write these permission/group/owner with explicit %attr directive in the spec file like --------------------------------------------------------------------- %files ... %attr(0770,root,%{dspam_group}) %dir %{dspam_logdir}/ %attr(0770,root,%{dspam_group}) %dir %{dspam_homedir}/ %attr(%{dspam_mode},%{dspam_user},%{dspam_group}) %dir %{_var}/run/dspam ... ... %{_bindir}/css* %attr(%{dspam_mode},%{dspam_user},%{dspam_group}) %{_bindir}/dspam %{_bindir}/dspam[-_c]* ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- (i.e. if the permission/group/owner is not (0755,root,root) (for directory/ executable files) or (0644,root,root) (normal files), you must use %attr explicitly in the spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:02:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484281] Review Request: jets3t - Java toolkit for the Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081702.o08H2CIL023574@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484281 --- Comment #5 from John Matthews 2010-01-08 12:02:10 EDT --- Sure, I'll post an updated version soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:04:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081704.o08H4be9024047@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 12:04:35 EDT --- kbackup is already orphaned: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00093.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-March/msg00103.html and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2191 (see tags and included? column) It is already more than 6 months and to reintroduce this package into Fedora again, the new review request is needed. Please submit the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:05:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081705.o08H5pNc024668@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 12:05:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > It is already more than 6 months and should be read as: It is already more than 6 months since this package was orphaned and -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:13:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081713.o08HDVNn026602@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de --- Comment #12 from Gerd Pokorra 2010-01-08 12:13:30 EDT --- Hi Lubomir, I got the gitolite package configured and cloned a repository from /var/lib/gitolite/repositories. Your instructions in comment #6 was very helpful. I think you should add this in a README file to the package. So other users can start quickly and find the basics to work with the gitolite package. My suggestion is to call the file README.Fedora or README.RPM or CONFIG.Fedora or only README and to add it to your patch (diff -u /dev/null README.Fedora >> gitolite-0.95-conf.patch) or try to get it in the upstream. If this is done und the source file name is changed for me the RPM for the nice software looks okay. If then not anyone have other comments in the next five days I would like to set the status from the review to done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:22:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081722.o08HMpgk004309@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #42 from Carl Byington 2010-01-08 12:22:49 EDT --- done. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-12.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1909842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:26:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081726.o08HQYUs031170@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #43 from Carl Byington 2010-01-08 12:26:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mpqc Short Description: Ab-inito chemistry program Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:31:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207532] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081731.o08HVpS1032453@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207532 --- Comment #30 from Alain PORTAL 2010-01-08 12:31:50 EDT --- OK, I?ll submit a new review request. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08Hbpis001586@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Bug 550601 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08HblJ1001550@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Bug 550597 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550519] Tracker: Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08HbkNh001543@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519 Bug 550519 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08HbmTm001562@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Bug 550598 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08Hbose001578@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Bug 550600 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08HbjE6001531@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 12:37:44 EDT --- Closing this one. Now you should be able to rebuild other themonospot-foo packges on F-11/12 (except for -gui-qt package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:37:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081737.o08Hbn71001570@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Bug 550599 depends on bug 550594, which changed state. Bug 550594 Summary: Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:47:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] New: Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 Summary: Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jarod at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jwilson.fedorapeople.org/packaging/rinputd/rinputd.spec SRPM URL: http://jwilson.fedorapeople.org/packaging/rinputd/rinputd-1.0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Remote Input server allows clients to send input events, such as mouse movements or keyboard presses, over a secure, authenticated communication channel. Remote devices, be they separate computers or mobile devices, can provide mouse, keyboard, multi-touch, switches and other input to the Remote Input server, and the server will create virtual keyboards and mice for each connection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 17:49:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] New: Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 Summary: Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jforbes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.linuxtx.org/rpms/seabios/seabios.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxtx.org/rpms/seabios/seabios-0.5.1-0.1.20100108git669c991.fc12.src.rpm Description: SeaBIOS is an open-source legacy BIOS implementation which can be used as a coreboot payload. It implements the standard BIOS calling interfaces that a typical x86 proprietary BIOS implements. Note that seabios is required for kvm 0.12 and later to function. It has replaced bochs for kvm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:00:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081800.o08I0h6l007779@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #9 from Hiemanshu 2010-01-08 13:00:42 EDT --- I have been out on vacation, I will take care of these as soon as possible. Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:16:55 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081816.o08IGtlj018611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #44 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-01-08 13:16:50 EDT --- * Fri Jan 8 2010 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.15.RC2 - Added README.cssclean to dspam-hash - Fixed logrotate script using non-existant dspam user - Cleaned up package -n naming - Corrected dspam, and other directory permissions to nobody:mail - Moved css* to dspam-hash as they are only needed with that driver - removed nonsense configure parameter enabling and disabling syslog http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.15.RC2.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------------- You were correct the dspam binary needed nobody:mail I didn't notice it wasn't the right owner as my setup doesn't run it in the daemon mode and specifically sets it to nobody:mail via postfix master.cf. ########### Questions: ########### 1) I'm wondering how you find the non-owned directories. After you showed me the other ones I tried to make sure I had them all but couldn't seem to find a command that gives that output via google... 2) The cron script for dspam requires that the user edit it to provide the path to the sql-script/backend they are using. So I would like it that upon upgrade, that file isn't overwritten however when marking it as %config(noreplace) I get rpmlint warnings about executable marked as config. Is there a proper way to have that file not be replaced by rpm on upgrades? I have one last issue I'm tracking down in the actual usage of the program as it should be placing logs in /var/log/dspam but they are being put in /var/lib/dspam at the moment even though the configure script is being told where so dspam should be behaving. Other than that dspam seems to be working well in my VMs and live boxes upgraded from a 3-4 year old self created rpm of 3.8.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:22:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081822.o08IMCG3013432@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-08 13:22:11 EDT --- For -4: * BR - Now this srpm calls autotools, "BR: automake" is needed ! Note After adding "BR: automake", build.log shows: -------------------------------------------------------- 145 + make -j4 146 (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/opendchub-0.8.1/missing --run autoheader) 147 autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot' -------------------------------------------------------- It is not preferable that autotools are automatically called after configure. So "$ autoheader" should also be called before configure. ! Miscs - Would you divide a long line (for example with containing more than 80 characters) into two lines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:21:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553717] New: Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 Summary: Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jarod at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jwilson.fedorapeople.org/packaging/libcrystalhd/libcrystalhd.spec SRPM URL: http://jwilson.fedorapeople.org/packaging/libcrystalhd/libcrystalhd-0.9.25-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The libcrystalhd library provides userspace access to Broadcom Crystal HD video decoder devices. The device supports hardware decoding of MPEG-2, h.264 and VC1 video codecs, up to 1080p at 40fps. The crystalhd kernel driver was accepted to the linux staging tree just a few days ago, and this library is the sole way one is supposed to interface with the decoder from userspace. It does also require a firmware image, which doesn't yet have a redistributable license applied to it, but Broadcom is working on making it so. For the moment, I'm using a modified tarball that strips out the firmware, but in the future, intend to produce a firmware sub-package straight off of this package. While one might be slightly scared at first blush with the mention of mpeg2, h.264 and vc1 decoding, its done entirely in hardware, which has its own paid-for codec licenses, so this gives us a viable way to decode video on Fedora without any patent issues. Applications simply dma an encoded bitstream into the device, and it spits out raw decoded frames of video for you to do with as you please (i.e., display them on your screen). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 18:48:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081848.o08ImKNf020025@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2010-01-08 13:48:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I got the gitolite package configured and cloned a repository from > /var/lib/gitolite/repositories. Your instructions in comment #6 was > very helpful. I think you should add this in a README file to the package. > So other users can start quickly and find the basics to work with the > gitolite package. > My suggestion is to call the file README.Fedora or README.RPM or > CONFIG.Fedora or only README and to add it to your patch > (diff -u /dev/null README.Fedora >> gitolite-0.95-conf.patch) > or try to get it in the upstream. While upstream had really weird deployment process of the thing, I intended not to break the existing documentation when adapting the package to RPM packaging. Is there anything that was unclear, wrong or missing from upstream documentation? In that case we should probably fix it up instead. On the other hand if your idea is just to add a few lines of quick start info, I won't mind adding it. > If this is done und the source file name is changed for me the RPM for > the nice software looks okay. > > If then not anyone have other comments in the next five days I would like to > set the status from the review to done. This is your review, therefore approval relies upon your findings. If anyone else finds a problem, he's free to open bugs, or commit into the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:06:19 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081906.o08J6JX1000969@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:07:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081907.o08J7rUw027032@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-08 14:07:52 EDT --- I'll review this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:09:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 474549] Review Request: ca-cacert.org - CAcert.org CA root certificates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081909.o08J9vIk027773@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Depends on| |466626 --- Comment #12 from David Woodhouse 2010-01-08 14:09:51 EDT --- Technical review... you include these files: %{pkidir}/tls/certs/%{name}-class1.crt %{pkidir}/tls/certs/%{class1hash}.0 But that is broken. Nothing will ever use the first, and I'm not even sure if they'll use the second. Besides, the hash function used is a fairly weak one and it's quite likely that there will be collisions. You can't just assume that you can use %{hash}.0 as the file name. We need a script to rebuild the /etc/pki/tls/cert.pem file from a configurable list of original certs, like Debian has (see bug #466626). And you should be using that in your %post script. You also need to add it to the system-wide NSS database. We have that working now, and hopefully we'll deploy it in firefox/thunderbird/evolution in time for Fedora 13. Then we can just add the new cert to the central database in /etc/pki/nssdb/ and it'll actually work for everything which uses NSS. Our solution for bug #466626 will need to do that too, presumably. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:09:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553402] Review Request: remmina - A GTK+ Remote Desktop Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081909.o08J9GXL002310@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553402 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2010-01-08 14:09:15 EDT --- > > In testing I did not find any SSH options, bug or feature? > It seems that to enable it, remmina needs to be compiled with libssh >= 0.4, > whereas Fedora <= 12 only provides 0.2 (but rawhide has 0.4) Seems like libssh 0.4 is coming to F11 and F12 soon: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13648 bug #541010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:16:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553210] Review Request: nanny - Parental Control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081916.o08JGX8g030936@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553210 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2010-01-08 14:16:30 EDT --- D-Bus issue http://fpaste.org/pEKp/ Content of configuration file http://fpaste.org/xga4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:26:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553739] New: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553739 Summary: Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/kbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kde-plasma-birthday-reminder-0.9.72-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: KBackup is a program that lets you back up any directories or files, whereby it uses an easy to use directory tree to select the things to back up. The program was designed to be very simple in its use so that it can be used by non-computer experts. The storage format is the well known TAR format, whereby the data is still stored in compressed format (bzip2 or gzip). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:28:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081928.o08JSVMI010587@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-08 14:28:30 EDT --- If I am not missing something then the package is buildable only on x86/x86_64 host. So it can't have BuildArch: noarch and some tricks will be required to produce the noarch binary rpm. Maybe a noarch subpackage containing the BIOS image and main package without the files section ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:42:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:42:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553742] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-kra-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-kra-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553742 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-kra-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting dogtag-pki-kra-ui into fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:48:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081948.o08JmrtX008696@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #21 from Ryan Rix 2010-01-08 14:48:51 EDT --- No, I don't think so. I'm curious why it wasn't closed. Guess I didn't attach the bug to the builds in bodhi. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:46:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081946.o08Jk6P4008192@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Joshua Roys 2010-01-08 14:46:04 EDT --- $ rpmlint pyatspi-0.1.4-3.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm pyatspi.noarch: I: checking pyatspi.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:50:34 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081950.o08JoYcl009333@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #18 from Dennis Gilmore 2010-01-08 14:50:31 EDT --- %{?fc10:Requires: selinux-policy-targeted >= 3.5.13-41} %{?fc11:Requires: selinux-policy-targeted >= 3.6.3-10} %{?fc10:BuildRequires: selinux-policy-devel >= 3.5.13-41} %{?fc11:BuildRequires: selinux-policy-devel >= 3.6.3-10} need to go they will only create confusion and are already irrelevant f-12 and rawhide are not covered and Fedora 10 is EOL having the generic Requires and BuildRequires are sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:49:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553739] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081949.o08JnOgb016115@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553739 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2010-01-08 14:49:23 EDT --- Wrong SRPMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:59:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081959.o08JxkkM012450@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.0-2.fc12 |0.2.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:56:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081956.o08Ju8mW011556@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 14:56:05 EDT --- tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tomcatjss'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:00:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082000.o08K0rMn020624@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 15:00:51 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:59:41 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081959.o08Jxfwk019969@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 14:59:39 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:00:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082000.o08K0vb6020649@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.0-4.fc11 |0.2.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 19:59:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001081959.o08JxKr3019860@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 14:59:18 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-common'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:04:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082004.o08K4ONN014378@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:00:48 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082000.o08K0mX7013005@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 15:00:46 EDT --- pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-common'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-0343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:05:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082005.o08K5RMM022813@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Riemens 2010-01-08 15:05:26 EDT --- Taking this for review, I'll probably review this tomorrow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:12:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546202] SIGABRT in "bonobo_activation_timeout_reg_check" in /usr/bin/GnoMenu.py In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082012.o08KCo8r018107@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546202 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(wmello at estacaotec | |h.com) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 15:12:48 EDT --- This isn't a package review request; I'm just going to close it. Feel free to file a bug against this package once it's in the distribution, if the problem persists then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:11:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:11:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082011.o08KBgHo017802@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham 2010-01-08 15:11:41 EDT --- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - OK (LGPLv3) - License field in spec matches - OK - License file included in package - OK. Also includes GPL just for the heck of it. - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - *** This is a git repo, so hard to test. Spec should follow the convention on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** Even if it's a noarch package, it should have ExclusiveArch set so we don't bother including it in ppc (or other) trees. Moreover, Dan's comment stands on how it builds. Might just be simplest to add the ExclusiveArch and remove the BuildArch. - BuildRequires correct - *** Doesn't appear to actually need python-devel. - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested x86_64) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - *** Needs to own %{_datadir}/seabios - No rpmlint output. - OK - final provides and requires are sane: *** Does this need to obsolete/provide bochs-bios? SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - did not test - Should build on all supported archs - did not test - Should function as described. - did not test - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - I suppose git from today is latest enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:12:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082012.o08KCIea025950@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:11:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553142] Merge Review: perl-MIME-tools - Modules for parsing and creating MIME entities in Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082011.o08KBqBB025425@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553142 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge review: |Merge Review: |perl-MIME-tools - Modules |perl-MIME-tools - Modules |for parsing and creating |for parsing and creating |MIME entities in Perl |MIME entities in Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:17:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546202] SIGABRT in "bonobo_activation_timeout_reg_check" in /usr/bin/GnoMenu.py In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082017.o08KHwAQ028647@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546202 --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-08 15:17:57 EDT --- If you would like to see this software packaged for Fedora, you might want to add it to the wishlist here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist if it isn't there already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:35:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082035.o08KZGg4025439@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-01-08 15:35:14 EDT --- Upstream has resolved the main licensing issue with AMD, which means that the license on plpa_map.c in PLPA 1.3.2 is now Free, making PLPA acceptable for Fedora. Unfortunately, AMD was unable to drop the export clauses from the plpa_map.c license, so plpa_map.c is Free but GPL Incompatible. I'm working with Red Hat Legal to propose an exception clause to cover this case for the GPL, and will propose it to the htop upstream. If they add the additional clause, we should be able to resolve 531055 without removing htop. Steve, if you're still interested in maintaining this package, please feel free to reopen. You'll need to make a new package using 1.3.2, and change the License tag to read: License: BSD and AMDPLPA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:39:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082039.o08KdFJ2026347@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:46:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082046.o08KkNjj004426@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-08 15:46:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > Even if it's a noarch package, it should have ExclusiveArch set so we don't > bother including it in ppc (or other) trees. > > Moreover, Dan's comment stands on how it builds. Might just be simplest to add > the ExclusiveArch and remove the BuildArch. Having the binary rpm as noarch would allow secondary architectures to import the resulting rpms into their kojis and have installable qemu in their repositories. The ExclusiveArch makes sense IMHO for RHEL not in Fedora (no arch besides x86/x86_64). See attachment for a demo spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:46:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082046.o08KksAZ004584@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-08 15:46:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=382548) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=382548) demo spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:47:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553739] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082047.o08Kl7lY004645@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553739 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2010-01-08 15:47:06 EDT --- The correct SRPM is: http://dionysos.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kbackup-0.6.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:58:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082058.o08KwcJ6032062@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak 2010-01-08 15:58:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=382554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=382554) Proposed spec file changes Would you consider this patch, please? -Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/musicpd/libmpdclient-2.1.tar.gz +Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/musicpd/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 There's .tar.bz2 file upstream. -%defattr (-,root,root) +%defattr (-,root,root,-) [...] -%defattr (-,root,root) +%defattr (-,root,root,-) Was a bit old fashioned. -%{_includedir}/mpd +%{_includedir}/mpd/ Just a matter of taste. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 20:59:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082059.o08Kx2BY008195@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:01:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553769] Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082101.o08L1bVV008894@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:01:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553769] New: Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 Summary: Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gholms.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://homepages.spa.umn.edu/~holms/euca2ools-1.1-1.fc12.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.spa.umn.edu/~holms/euca2ools-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: EUCALYPTUS is an open source service overlay that implements elastic computing using existing resources. The goal of EUCALYPTUS is to allow sites with existing clusters and server infrastructure to co-host an elastic computing service that is interface-compatible with Amazon's EC2. This package contains the command line tools to interact with Eucalyptus. This tools are compatible with Amazon EC2. Other info: I am in need of a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:12:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082112.o08LCBPR011531@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #5 from Justin M. Forbes 2010-01-08 16:12:10 EDT --- I can go either way. There is benefit in having the package noarch because things besides kvm can actually use the bios image. That said, having an empty package to facilitate this seems really hackish too. For the python-devel buildrequires, it is actually needed. Testing in mock showed that it would not build without python-devel. The compiler test script uses it. It does not make sense to obsolete bochs-bios or provide it. While kvm 0.12 and newer will only work with seabios, there are other uses for bochs-bios in Fedora {probably not in RHEL}. Both rpms can be installed side by side, and once this package is in the repository kvm will be updated to use and require seabios. Builds were tested in mock for x86_64 and x86. I have a spec update to include the source conventions and directory ownership, just want consensus on the arch issue before it is pushed. FWIW, vgabios is built in a similar fashion, with buildarch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:17:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082117.o08LHU1w004548@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2010-01-08 16:17:30 EDT --- Just a few notes before doing the official review: - Why are you not using the %cmake macro? - rpmlint is not silent: [makerpm at laptop-stefan SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/rinputd*.rpm rinputd.spec rinputd.i686: E: postin-without-chkconfig /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-preun /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Start in /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd.i686: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/rinputd rinputd-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources rinputd-devel.i686: W: non-standard-group Libraries/Development rinputd-devel.i686: W: no-documentation rinputd.spec:23: W: non-standard-group Libraries/Development rinputd.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 8 warnings. I'm not saying everything can or should be fixed, but a couple of obvious ones shouldn't be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:20:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553739] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082120.o08LKs7Q013665@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553739 --- Comment #3 from Alain PORTAL 2010-01-08 16:20:53 EDT --- Sorry... Thank Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:20:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082120.o08LK1XE013252@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2010-01-08 16:20:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > For the python-devel buildrequires, it is actually needed. Testing in mock > showed that it would not build without python-devel. The compiler test script > uses it. Fairly sure that just requires python, not python-devel? > It does not make sense to obsolete bochs-bios or provide it. While kvm 0.12 > and newer will only work with seabios, there are other uses for bochs-bios in > Fedora {probably not in RHEL}. Both rpms can be installed side by side, and > once this package is in the repository kvm will be updated to use and require > seabios. OK. > I have a spec update to include the source conventions and directory ownership, > just want consensus on the arch issue before it is pushed. FWIW, vgabios is > built in a similar fashion, with buildarch: noarch The problem is, as it is now, you're going to run into problems building it on a koji-type system that has non-x86 architectures; it will get assigned to non-x86 builders and fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:30:06 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:30:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082130.o08LU6MK007955@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 457211, which changed state. Bug 457211 Summary: Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:30:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082130.o08LU5XR007938@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Bug 456756 depends on bug 457211, which changed state. Bug 457211 Summary: Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:30:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082130.o08LU2R1007913@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Alias|debhelper | --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-08 16:30:01 EDT --- 'Submitter not responding' -> NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:29:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082129.o08LTH8o016116@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 456756, which changed state. Bug 456756 Summary: Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:29:04 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082129.o08LT4go016076@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Alias|alien | Flag|needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo | |glemail.com) | --- Comment #14 from Thomas Spura 2010-01-08 16:28:59 EDT --- 'Submitter not responding' -> NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 21:51:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082151.o08LpwGa021730@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 16:51:56 EDT --- Who is actually submitting this package now? The "sponsorship needed" list shows Alex Lancaster: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html. If that's not correct then you now understand why we ask that if someone else is submitting a review, they open their own review ticket. Otherwise we have no real way to tell what's going on without actually reading all of the tickets, and there are too many to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:06:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082206.o08M6Rl9026416@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 --- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson 2010-01-08 17:06:26 EDT --- Bah. I suck. I usually run rpmlint over everything, but its been a while since I've done a new package... Yeah, I can fix most of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:10:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082210.o08MAjNX027623@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 Jon Masters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pmatilai at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:10:07 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082210.o08MA7TP027296@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 Jon Masters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jcm at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:16:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082216.o08MGqmp021466@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:20:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082220.o08MKSuG030217@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge | |.net) | --- Comment #36 from Alex Lancaster 2010-01-08 17:20:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Who is actually submitting this package now? The "sponsorship needed" list > shows Alex Lancaster: > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html. If that's not > correct then you now understand why we ask that if someone else is submitting a > review, they open their own review ticket. Otherwise we have no real way to > tell what's going on without actually reading all of the tickets, and there are > too many to do that. Graeme is submitting the package, originally I was going to do the review, but since Graeme is a new package, he needs to be sponsored. Is there no way to change the reporter or otherwise indicate that a different person is submitting the review than open a whole new bug? If not: Graeme can you open up a new bug and close this as a duplicate of the new bug? Make sure to Cc Matthias as a potential sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:25:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082225.o08MPHPg023809@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-08 17:25:15 EDT --- ------------------------------- Updated spec file and src rpm to remove obsolete Requires and Build Requires: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux-1.3.0-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:21:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553717] Review Request: libcrystalhd - Broadcom Crystal HD device interface library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082221.o08MLXvK022768@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553717 --- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson 2010-01-08 17:21:32 EDT --- Excellent, thanks much! A few additional notes I neglected to mention... There's actually source for a gstreamer plugin for the decoder in here as well, but I'm not yet building it. It did build last I tried, and kind of worked at little bit, but not entirely. That code needs love from a gstreamer person before I'm particularly comfortable building binary packages of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:22:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553705] Review Request: rinputd - A server for receiving input events over the network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082222.o08MM3bV030701@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553705 --- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson 2010-01-08 17:22:01 EDT --- And by the way, thanks much for picking up this review, its is indeed very cool stuff... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:31:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:31:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082231.o08MVoj0026218@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:43:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082243.o08MhgHs028950@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com, | |orion at cora.nwra.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-08 17:43:40 EDT --- * rpmlint jdepend.spec:38: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java - I don't think this matters jdepend.spec:53: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation - Think we'er using "Documentation" now. jdepend.spec:63: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java jdepend.spec:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - not needed jdepend.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install - but needed here jdepend.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 31) * naming - check * NamingGuidelines * licensing BSD * osi approved? yes * included? yes * correct mentioned in specfile? yes specfile * American English - yes * legible - yes * ExcludeArch, blocking - na * BuildRequires - yes * Locales - na * shared libraries: ldconfig - na * %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes * macros - * sources - check * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - na * files and directories - Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now * owns all created directories - yes * all files listed in %files * permissions? * deffattr? - yes * no .la files - yes * .desktop for GUI applications - na * no conflicts with other packets - yes * permissable content - yes * doc - yes * large doc in -doc package - na * must not affect runtime - yes * sane scriptlets - No longer need: # for /bin/rm and /bin/ln Requires(post): coreutils Requires(postun): coreutils * subpackages with fully versioned dependency - - Guidelines specify that the javadoc package require the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:41:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520204] Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082241.o08Mfov7004133@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204 Garrett Holmstrom changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gholms.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-01-08 17:41:48 EDT --- I am not a sponsor (or even a packager yet), however here are some informal comments based on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines rpmlint reports: aspell-ro.src:26: W: configure-without-libdir-spec - This one's OK because it isn't an autoconf-based configure. aspell-ro.x86_64: E: no-binary aspell-ro.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - As far as I know these are OK simply because it's an aspell dictionary package. aspell-ro-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package - I don't think you need a debuginfo package for aspell dictionaries. If you add the line "%define debug_package %{nil}" to your spec file it won't try to build one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 22:49:21 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 17:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553769] Review Request: euca2ools - Tools for Eucalyptus EC2-compatible Computation Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082249.o08MnLR4030218@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553769 --- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom 2010-01-08 17:49:20 EDT --- Updated to include COPYING and INSTALL docfiles Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1910580 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 23:06:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082306.o08N6c8n002974@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-08 18:06:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer-plugins-fc Short Description: Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer Owners: mschwendt Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 23:16:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553706] Review Request: seabios - Open-source legacy BIOS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082316.o08NGqJI013780@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553706 --- Comment #7 from Justin M. Forbes 2010-01-08 18:16:51 EDT --- Spec and srpm have been updated in same location: - Source has been commented to include command to regenerate the tarball from the git tree - Changed BuildArch: noarch to ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 It made more sense to limit the arch to the actual users of kvm for the moment than to create a dead and worthless package to track just to work around current koji limitations - Changed BuildRequires: python-devel to BuildRequires: python (thanks for the catch there) - Added %{_datadir}/seabio to %files - Clean up on the Makefile sed, add comment explaining why it is done, and remove the unnecessary cp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 23:33:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082333.o08NXNl6018155@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-08 18:33:21 EDT --- > install -m 644 !(static).py?(c|o) $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/share/font-manager/ install -m 644 *.py{,c,o} $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/share/font-manager/ rm $(DESTDIR)$(prefix)/share/font-manager/static.py* :-) > but in the Makefile, I have : > > @python -OO -m compileall . > > So, it seems to compile with -O2 if I understand correctly. Am I wrong here? $ grep compile src/Makefile.am @python -m compileall . @python -OO -m compileall . That creates .pyc files in first pass and .pyo files in second pass. Then with regard to $ python --help|grep OO -OO : remove doc-strings in addition to the -O optimizations and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Including_pyos https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_Compiled_Files I thought you could compile with plain -O as rpmbuild's /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile script does it. Not a blocker, though. It's not a MUST in the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 23:53:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082353.o08NrKPx023098@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 18:53:18 EDT --- pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 8 23:55:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001082355.o08Ntwb6016048@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2010-01-08 18:55:56 EDT --- pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 00:36:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090036.o090avn5001267@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #16 from D Haley 2010-01-08 19:36:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Unfortunately my fedora box's motherboard packed it in the other day and, being quite busy at the moment, I will not be able to replace it for another month at the least. In addition I had been side-prepping the newer release of UDAV which came out a few weeks ago. So in short, I will most certainly address your review, but not for another 4-6 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 00:54:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090054.o090sRjN029612@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 00:54:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551878] Review Request: font-manager - A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090054.o090sVZF029630@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551878 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 00:56:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090056.o090uKSF030308@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226192 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 19:56:16 EDT --- Indeed the package does look better. Still quite a number of rpmlint complaints, most of which can be ignored, but I'll post the full list: net-snmp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv Agreed that this may be OK, but what was the last release that put data in /var/net-snmp? If it was more than a few releases ago, there's no point in keeping this bit at all. At the least, some indication of which releases require it is in order. Similarly, "allow compilation on old Fedoras" can go if "old Fedoras" is older than F10. At the very least, some statement of "how old" would be good to have. net-snmp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/net-snmp-5.5/agent/helpers/table_row.c If you fixed it upstream, great; this isn't really that big of a deal anyway. Honestly it would be nice if the debuginfo generation took care of that kind of thing anyway. net-snmp-libs.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libnetsnmpagent.so.20.0.0 netsnmp_register_null_context Six of these in this library with different symbols. I suppose if you want to use this library you also have to link against some other library which provides those symbols. That's bad programming practice but not a review blocker. net-snmp-libs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libnetsnmpagent.so.20.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10 Many of these in various different libraries. All of these libraries are linked against other libraries even though they call nothing in them. This probably isn't an issue as most of these libraries will be in memory anyway, although there are a couple of libperl.so references that don't need to be there. In general these are OK; they're bad if the force unnecessary dependencies or pull in unused libraries that won't generally already be in memory, and you can get rid of them with "-Wl,--as-needed" on the link line. Maybe that's what "--enable-as-needed" on the configure line is for, but it doesn't seem to help. In any case I don't see anything which would block a review. One minor nit is that I don't see the point of the "Building option" bit in %description. When you see that in the final package, it makes it seem that use of tcp_wrappers is disabled when in fact it's enabled. Such a comment is appropriate for the spec file but not really useful in the binary package. So really, this is very close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 00:57:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521671] Review Request: R-plyr - Tools for splitting, applying, and combining data in R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090057.o090vKNC005612@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521671 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tom at moertel.com) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-08 19:57:19 EDT --- Is anything happening here? It's been more than two months since I approved this package and I see no CVS request or even a response from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 01:31:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553186] Review Request: jansson - JSON parsing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090131.o091VPwH013554@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553186 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-08 20:31:24 EDT --- * The pkgconfig patch is acceptable. Though, simple libraries like this one (empty cflags, trivial ldflags) can be checked with autotools macros. * There is a nasty autoheader warning. A simple "touch config.h.in" in %prep fixes it here. * A shorter .bz2 tarball is available upstream. * If you don't plan to maintain this for EPEL, you could simplify the spec file in several places. Are you aware of that possibility? * The short "README" file is very confusing as it refers to something that isn't possible with your package. * No API documentation. Not even the .rst files are included. Can the html doc be generated within Fedora? Or could you mirror a snapshot of the online docs and use them in a second Source archive? * The %changelog refers to the future: Thu Dec 07 2010 * Why is "make check" not run? It looks suitable for a %check section. And even if it didn't work or didn't return compatible error codes, it's common practise to run it in %check to fill the build logs with as many test results as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 01:33:35 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090133.o091XZvY006362@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-08 20:33:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyatspi Short Description: Python bindings for at-spi Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 03:46:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 22:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539873] netgen-mesher - automatic 3d tetrahedral mesh generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090346.o093k3b4026967@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539873 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nuovodna at gmail.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:10:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553842] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-kra Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-kra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553842 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-kra Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:13:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553842] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-kra In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090413.o094D5q4032464@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553842 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alee at redhat.com, | |awnuk at redhat.com, | |cfu at redhat.com, | |mharmsen at redhat.com Blocks| |520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:20:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553844] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ocsp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ocsp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553844 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ocsp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:17:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553843] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ocsp-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090417.o094HWIO000901@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553843 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alee at redhat.com, | |awnuk at redhat.com, | |cfu at redhat.com, | |mharmsen at redhat.com Blocks| |520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:16:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553843] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ocsp-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ocsp-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553843 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ocsp-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:21:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553844] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ocsp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090421.o094L94U001695@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553844 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alee at redhat.com, | |awnuk at redhat.com, | |cfu at redhat.com, | |mharmsen at redhat.com Blocks| |520534(Dogtag-to-Fedora) Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:25:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553845] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tks-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tks-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553845 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tks-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:31:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090431.o094VKj3009466@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:31:19 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:30:30 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090430.o094UUjL009340@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:30:28 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:29:43 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553208] Review Request: perl-OpenGL - Perl OpenGL bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090429.o094ThT0008973@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553208 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:29:38 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:27:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:27:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553847] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553847 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:30:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553848] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ra-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ra-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553848 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ra-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:33:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:33:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090433.o094XXCc004037@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:33:27 EST --- We aren't doing F-13 branches yet. Did F-12 and devel for you here. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:31:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553850] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ra Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553850 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ra Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:34:00 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553852] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553852 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-tps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:32:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553851] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tps-ui Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tps-ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553851 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-tps-ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwright at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, cfu at redhat.com, jmagne at redhat.com, alee at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, awnuk at redhat.com, kwright at redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- first pass at getting this built in fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:34:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090434.o094Ypax009930@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:34:50 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:32:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090432.o094WHGb009676@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:32:13 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:36:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 445068] Review Request: ocaml-bin-prot - Read and write OCaml values in a type-safe binary protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090436.o094aSO9010357@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445068 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:36:27 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:34:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090434.o094YAoZ009850@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:34:09 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:37:39 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090437.o094bdu5005311@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:37:34 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:39:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090439.o094dPdB005532@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:39:24 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:35:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090435.o094ZvHl004715@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:35:48 EST --- cvs done (with devel and F-12 branches). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:38:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:38:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090438.o094cPMN010549@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:38:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:43:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090443.o094hlGI006150@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-08 23:43:42 EST --- Kevin, Sorry. I actually need F-12 and EL-5 branches created. Branches: F-11 F-12, EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:41:11 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090441.o094fBCL006016@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:41:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > New Package CVS Request > ======================= > Package Name: tomcatjss > Short Description: A Java Secure Socket Extension (JSSE) implementation using > Java Security Services (JSS) for Tomcat 5.5. > Owners: kwright > Branches: F-10 F-11, EL-5 > InitialCC: ausil Are you just wanting a EL-5 branch added here? We no longer do F-10 branches, and F-11 seems to already exist. Can you clarify? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:48:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090448.o094mnxF012396@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:48:48 EST --- There already is a F-12 branch (make sure you do 'cvs update -d'). Added a EL-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:49:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090449.o094nAr7012423@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:47:33 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090447.o094lXSs012335@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:50:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090450.o094oPmR012783@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:50:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:51:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090451.o094pG8U007297@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2010-01-08 23:51:13 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 04:53:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090453.o094rvB3013059@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Wright 2010-01-08 23:53:54 EST --- right. will do, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:03:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226205] Merge Review: nss_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090503.o0953a3t008685@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226205 --- Comment #3 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2010-01-09 00:03:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Package Change Request > ====================== > Package Name: nss_ldap > New Branches: F-11 > > I'd like to split the pam_ldap bits into a second binary package. Filed bug #553857 for the splitting of the two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:01:50 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553857] New: Review Request - pam_ldap (for an nss_ldap/pam_ldap split) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request - pam_ldap (for an nss_ldap/pam_ldap split) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553857 Summary: Review Request - pam_ldap (for an nss_ldap/pam_ldap split) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nalin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The pam_ldap module's been in the nss_ldap package for *years*, despite being a different upstream project with its own web site and version numbering. Having them in there together makes it harder to try alternate implementations of one or the other. Spec URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/pam_ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/pam_ldap-185-1.src.rpm Spec URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/nss_ldap.spec SRPM URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/nss_ldap-265-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:24:53 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090524.o095OrbU012365@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:25:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090525.o095PNJe018345@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:34:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553739] Review Request: kbackup - Back up your data in a simple, user friendly way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090534.o095YS9x013614@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553739 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 05:53:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553842] Review Request: pki-kra - (put a description here) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090553.o095rbgs022870@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553842 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|New Package for Dogtag PKI: |Review Request: pki-kra - |pki-kra |(put a description here) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-09 00:53:32 EST --- Be nice if you folks could use the standard template for review requests. Of course, it would also be nice if you could wait until you actually have packages to submit before opening all these tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 06:19:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 01:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090619.o096JAl7027136@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen 2010-01-09 01:19:04 EST --- built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 08:57:08 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 03:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090857.o098v86t020300@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 03:57:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > * rpmlint > > jdepend.spec:38: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java > - I don't think this matters Fixed. > > jdepend.spec:53: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation > - Think we'er using "Documentation" now. Fixed. > jdepend.spec:63: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java Fixed. > jdepend.spec:70: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > - not needed Fixed. > > jdepend.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > - but needed here Fixed. > > jdepend.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line 31) Fixed. > > * naming - check > * NamingGuidelines > * licensing BSD > * osi approved? yes > * included? yes > * correct mentioned in specfile? yes > > specfile > > * American English - yes > * legible - yes > * ExcludeArch, blocking - na > * BuildRequires - yes > * Locales - na > * shared libraries: ldconfig - na > * %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes > * macros - > * sources - check > * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - na > * files and directories > > - Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now > > * owns all created directories - yes > * all files listed in %files > * permissions? > * deffattr? - yes > * no .la files - yes > * .desktop for GUI applications - na > * no conflicts with other packets - yes > * permissable content - yes > * doc - yes > * large doc in -doc package - na > * must not affect runtime - yes > * sane scriptlets > > - No longer need: > > # for /bin/rm and /bin/ln > Requires(post): coreutils > Requires(postun): coreutils Fixed. > > * subpackages with fully versioned dependency - > > - Guidelines specify that the javadoc package require the main package Fixed. Btw, I've also update to the latest 2.9.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:14:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520204] Review Request: aspell-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090914.o099ENeC018730@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: aspell5-ro |Review Request: aspell-ro - |- Romanian dictionary for |Romanian dictionary for |Aspell |Aspell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:15:54 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553882] New: Review Request: maven-jflex-plugin - Maven JFlex Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-jflex-plugin - Maven JFlex Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553882 Summary: Review Request: maven-jflex-plugin - Maven JFlex Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-jflex-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-jflex-plugin-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a Maven 2 plugin to generate a parser in Java code from a Lexer definition, using Jflex.de. Rpmlint problems: maven-jflex-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-jflex-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-jflex-plugin There is nothing suitable for documentation and the maven one should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:23:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090923.o099NMp9026757@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:45:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - A cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090945.o099jbnq030972@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:55:36 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090955.o099tamI000729@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 04:55:33 EST --- First thing: There is no javadoc package. For me this is a strict requirement for every java library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:55:52 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552580] Review Request: xml-stylebook - Apache XML Stylebook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090955.o099tqjg000775@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552580 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 09:57:03 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001090957.o099v3NC000919@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 10:47:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091047.o09AlWpC005377@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #10 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 05:47:29 EST --- Would it be acceptable to ship these two packages from the same CVS module (and so with one .spec as well)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 10:46:46 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:46:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091046.o09Akkg0010539@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 05:46:42 EST --- Rpmlint warnings: * apache-commons-jexl.spec:59: W: non-standard-group Development Documentation FIXIT Documentation only should be ok * apache-commons-jexl.spec:141: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} FIXIT There is no usage of the gcj_support nowadays and most of the java packagers are actively dropping it from their spec files. Please keep it if you have some strong usage for it otherwise it's just cluttering the spec and making the package needlessly arch specific. Also if you decide to keep it please mark the javadoc subpackage as noarch. * apache-commons-jexl.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/apache-commons-jexl This is ok. Maven is working in a strange way so we have to live with it. Review: OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc in this case. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Package looks good. Please take care for the items marked with FIXIT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 10:55:13 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091055.o09AtDvU012615@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 05:55:07 EST --- Thanks Mamoru! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-calendar_date_select Short Description: A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 10:57:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 05:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551743] Review Request: cnucnu - Upstream release monitoring with bug reporting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091057.o09AvnQt007235@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551743 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Felix Kaechele 2010-01-09 05:57:47 EST --- Could you please use the snapshots provided by gitweb or setup.py? That would make it easier for me to compare the upstream tarball to the tarball you provide in the snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:01:05 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091101.o09B15Jd013613@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 06:01:00 EST --- One more thing you need to add the following lines in your %prep section: sed -i "s|1.2|1.3|g" pom.xml sed -i "s|1.2|1.3 |g" pom.xml This is needed because maven in rawhide no longer accepts source 1.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:13:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091113.o09BDxn6016187@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Enrico Scholz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu | |-chemnitz.de --- Comment #45 from Enrico Scholz 2010-01-09 06:13:48 EST --- The user 'nobody' is not possible for a packaged daemon. Daemons should run unprivileged; using common accounts like 'nobody' or 'bin' or 'daemon' allows independent daemons (e.g. dspam and dnsmasq) to influence each other (e.g. by 'ptrace'). Please use a dedicated account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:26:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:26:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091126.o09BQv1d013789@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 06:26:55 EST --- (In reply to comment #45) > The user 'nobody' is not possible for a packaged daemon. Daemons should run > unprivileged; using common accounts like 'nobody' or 'bin' or 'daemon' allows > independent daemons (e.g. dspam and dnsmasq) to influence each other (e.g. by > 'ptrace'). Please use a dedicated account. If you think this is a MUST, would you post some proposal on fedora-packaging list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:31:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553893] New: Review Request: rubygem-tiny_mce - TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tiny_mce - TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553893 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-tiny_mce - TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-tiny_mce.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-tiny_mce-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides for the installation and utilization of TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications. TinyMCE is a WYSIWYG HTML editing component released under the GNU Public License 2.1 (GPL 2.1) by Moxiecode Systems (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:43:17 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091143.o09BhHbo017112@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net --- Comment #80 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-09 06:43:07 EST --- cc athimm Axel: can you build arpack for EPEL 5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:46:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:46:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091146.o09BkgWZ023636@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 06:46:37 EST --- I think 2 gems (-ruby-debug & -ruby-debug-base) should be packaged into seperated srpms (and so CVS request should be done seperately). Also I think seperating these 2 gems will make spec file more readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 11:47:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 06:47:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - A cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091147.o09Blnjk023860@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2010-01-09 06:47:43 EST --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: bf8394d944fb34fdce8d5b82c891c180dc7af05e bakefile-0.2.8.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (MIT). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. BAD %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. BAD no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - use http://download.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz as the value of Source tag, the URL used doesn't lead to the source archive - you must have automake as Requires for proper ownership of /usr/share/aclocal directory where some files are placed - a test-suite is included in the source archive, but it's not run - _bkl_c.la file must not be included, use a "rm" command in %install or %exclude in %files - includes copies of uuid and subprocess python modules, system ones provided by the python package or some add-on package must be used - includes a copy of empy python module, this one must be packaged independently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:00:16 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091200.o09C0GiQ021365@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #47 from Enrico Scholz 2010-01-09 07:00:12 EST --- no; too much politics and pragmatisms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:06:27 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091206.o09C6RUa028170@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #12 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 07:06:22 EST --- Fair enough, let's hold off on this one until we have rubygem-ruby-debug-base packaged/reviewed then -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:11:56 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:11:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553898] Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091211.o09CBuFn023387@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |553893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:11:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553893] Review Request: rubygem-tiny_mce - TinyMCE in Ruby on Rails applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091211.o09CBvk1023397@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553893 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |553898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:11:15 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553898] New: Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-jeweler.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-jeweler-1.4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: \ Jeweler provides two things: * Rake tasks for managing gems and versioning of a GitHub project * A generator for creating kickstarting a new project * NOTE: %check has a lot of dependencies not yet in Fedora, so it's disabled for now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:16:38 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553882] Review Request: maven-jflex-plugin - Maven JFlex Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091216.o09CGct5024423@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553882 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:29:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553902] New: Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553902 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-gemcutter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-gemcutter-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The gemcutter client gem that interacts with the site http://gemcutter.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:29:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553902] Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091229.o09CTN8I000585@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553902 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |553898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 12:29:23 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 07:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553898] Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091229.o09CTNnS000583@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |553902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 13:12:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091312.o09DCjjI009967@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #48 from Paul Howarth 2010-01-09 08:12:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #45) > The user 'nobody' is not possible for a packaged daemon. Daemons should run > unprivileged; using common accounts like 'nobody' or 'bin' or 'daemon' allows > independent daemons (e.g. dspam and dnsmasq) to influence each other (e.g. by > 'ptrace'). Please use a dedicated account. And it's particularly important that files are not owned by the "nobody" account, as these could then be overwritten by any process running with that UID - such processes are intended to have minimal privileges and should certainly not be able to write to any system files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 13:16:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553908] New: Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553908 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-shoulda.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-shoulda-2.10.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Shoulda makes it easy to write elegant, understandable, and maintainable tests. Shoulda consists of test macros, assertions, and helpers added on to the Test::Unit framework. It's fully compatible with your existing tests, and requires no retooling to use. * NOTE: rake test fails with one failure and one error, which I don't understand -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 13:17:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553908] Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091317.o09DH10r005276@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553908 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |553902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 13:42:49 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091342.o09DgnLG011727@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #9 from Louis Lagendijk 2010-01-09 08:42:41 EST --- Ping? Still no reaction! I propose to close this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 13:17:01 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553902] Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091317.o09DH1Qt005275@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553902 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |553908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:17:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091417.o09EHpBE025656@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #10 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-09 09:17:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > For -4: > > * BR > - Now this srpm calls autotools, "BR: automake" is needed What about aclocal and autoconf, should they be also added to BR ? > After adding "BR: automake", build.log shows: > -------------------------------------------------------- > 145 + make -j4 > 146 (CDPATH="${ZSH_VERSION+.}:" && cd . && /bin/sh > /builddir/build/BUILD/opendchub-0.8.1/missing --run autoheader) > 147 autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', > `config.h.bot' > -------------------------------------------------------- > It is not preferable that autotools are automatically called > after configure. So "$ autoheader" should also be called > before configure. I added autoheader to %build before configure, even then autoheader is being called again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:24:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091424.o09EOA0E026920@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 09:24:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > For -4: > > * BR > > - Now this srpm calls autotools, "BR: automake" is needed > What about aclocal and autoconf, should they be also added to BR ? - /usr/bin/aclocal is in automake rpm, and automake has "Requires: autoconf" > I added autoheader to %build before configure, even then autoheader is being > called again. - Would you try aclocal -> autoheader -> autoconf -> automake ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:29:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553918] New: Review Request: ruby-1.8.6 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-1.8.6 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553918 Summary: Review Request: ruby-1.8.6 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=kanarip/public_git/ruby-specs.git;a=blob;f=ruby-1.8.6.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13-ruby/SRPMS/ruby-1.8.6-383-12.fc13.src.rpm Description: Ruby is the interpreted scripting language for quick and easy object-oriented programming. It has many features to process text files and to do system management tasks (as in Perl). It is simple, straight-forward, and extensible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:28:37 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 552331] Review Request: piranha - Tools for administration of Linux Virtual Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091428.o09ESbes028169@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552331 --- Comment #4 from Milos Jakubicek 2010-01-09 09:28:34 EST --- - Please don't forget to bump the release number, otherwise it's just confusing! - Remove shadow-utils from Requires(postun) as well (as I wrote before). - Use %{_initddir} instead of %{_initrddir}, read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem - Fix %config(noreplace) /etc/logrotate.d/piranha => %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/piranha - patches documentation still missing - /etc/sysconfig misuse still unhandled - Remove the unnecessary Requires: popt (this will be added automatically by rpm) - Looking forward to see the new sources solving the licensing issues... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:27:47 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:27:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553917] New: Review Request: ruby-1.9.1 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-1.9.1 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553917 Summary: Review Request: ruby-1.9.1 - An interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=kanarip/public_git/ruby-specs.git;a=blob;f=ruby-1.9.1.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f13-ruby/SRPMS/ruby-1.9.1-376-11.fc13.src.rpm Description: Ruby is the interpreted scripting language for quick and easy object-oriented programming. It has many features to process text files and to do system management tasks (as in Perl). It is simple, straight-forward, and extensible. See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ruby_1.9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:31:45 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091431.o09EVjZL023304@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #12 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-09 09:31:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > > > - Now this srpm calls autotools, "BR: automake" is needed > > What about aclocal and autoconf, should they be also added to BR ? > > - /usr/bin/aclocal is in automake rpm, and automake has > "Requires: autoconf" ok. > > > I added autoheader to %build before configure, even then autoheader is being > > called again. > > - Would you try aclocal -> autoheader -> autoconf -> automake ? still the same. BTW how do you save the build.log. I use rpmbuild -ba to create rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 14:35:42 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091435.o09EZgxx029741@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 09:35:36 EST --- Let's wait for another one week. If no response is received from the reporter within one week, you or I will close this bug as NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 15:13:18 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:13:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091513.o09FDIfO031515@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt 2010-01-09 10:13:13 EST --- Thanks for the review! Built for Rawhide and F-12, F-11: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gstreamer-plugins-fc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 15:59:59 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553902] Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091559.o09Fxx1S008604@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553902 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2010-01-09 10:59:52 EST --- Hi Jeroen, Please have a look at the rpmlint output: [ruben at slice SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/rubygem-gemcutter-0.3.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm rubygem-gemcutter.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.7-1 ['0.3.0-1.fc13', '0.3.0-1'] rubygem-gemcutter.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gemcutter-0.3.0/MIT-LICENSE rubygem-gemcutter.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/gemcutter-0.3.0/ri/Gem/AbstractCommand/api_key%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-gemcutter.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/gemcutter-0.3.0/ri/Gem/AbstractCommand/use_proxy%21-i.yaml %21 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. [ruben at slice SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/rubygem-gemcutter-0.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm rubygem-gemcutter.src: W: strange-permission rubygem-gemcutter.spec 0640L 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 15:59:02 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091559.o09Fx2ER010806@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:12:31 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553908] Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091612.o09GCVkL011176@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553908 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2010-01-09 11:12:28 EST --- Hi Jeroen, - You're missing a BuildRequires on dos2unix - You're missing a BuildRequires on rubygem-rake, rubygem-sqlite3-ruby, rubygem-mocha and rubygem-rails (for the tests) Other than that, the tests fail for me as well, with the following output: 1) Error: test: Post should require body to be set. (PostTest): ArgumentError: interning empty string config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/allow_value_matcher.rb:62:in `errors_match?' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/allow_value_matcher.rb:43:in `matches?' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/validation_matcher.rb:44:in `disallows_value_of' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/validate_presence_of_matcher.rb:32:in `matches?' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/assertions.rb:49:in `assert_accepts' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/macros.rb:41:in `__bind_1263053408_210423' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `call' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `test: Post should require body to be set. ' 2) Failure: test: should fail when trying to run: should require unique value for title. (PostTest) [/test/fail_macros.rb:33:in `__bind_1263053408_330430' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `call' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `test: should fail when trying to run: should require unique value for title. ']: exception expected but was Class: Message: <"interning empty string"> ---Backtrace--- config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/helpers.rb:5:in `map' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/helpers.rb:5:in `pretty_error_messages' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/allow_value_matcher.rb:95:in `error_description' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/allow_value_matcher.rb:51:in `negative_failure_message' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/validation_matcher.rb:45:in `disallows_value_of' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/validate_uniqueness_of_matcher.rb:103:in `validate_attribute' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/matchers/validate_uniqueness_of_matcher.rb:72:in `matches?' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/assertions.rb:49:in `assert_accepts' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/active_record/macros.rb:74:in `__bind_1263053408_330430' /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/erb.rb:716:in `to_proc' /test/fail_macros.rb:33:in `__bind_1263053408_330430' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `call' config/initializers/./../../../lib/shoulda/context.rb:351:in `test: should fail when trying to run: should require unique value for title. ' --------------- 463 tests, 578 assertions, 1 failures, 1 errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:24:09 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553898] Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091624.o09GO9Zp013427@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2010-01-09 11:24:05 EST --- Hi Jeroen, There's a missing BuildRequires on rubygem-rcov. After disabling %check, the package builds fine, but please have a look at the rpmlint output, and your umask :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:31:22 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091631.o09GVMPm015182@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #26 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-09 11:31:13 EST --- Thanks for these updates Christoph, I was quite clearly not with it when doing this package to have missed those. October was somewhat of a blur :-( > Sorry, but there are definitely blockers left: > - the unversioned libs in /usr/lib64/ethos/plugin-loaders/ belong into the > devel package Fixed. > - using %{_libdir}/python2.6/ in the files section is a no-go. Please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture > for how to do this properly. > - vala package should be noarch as it contains no arch dependent files Fixed. > > It should be this package that owns it. > > > > > gobject-introspection-devel-0:0.6.7-1.fc13.i686 Fixed. > Then you need the devel package require gobject-introspection-devel for > directory ownership. Currently the requirements autogenerated from the pkconfig > files only include > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) > pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) > This means that only glib2-devel and gtk2-devel are pulled in. And even if we > had pkgconfig(introspection-1.0.pc) I'd still prefer requiring > gobject-introspection-devel because all this stuff only works with newer > versions of rpm. For some reason I thought this was done automatically now. Don't see RPM version really as an issue as I don't plan to push it to anythin earlier than F-12. Fixed anyway. > There are more potentially unowned dirs: > - doc package puts files into %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html, so it needs to require > gtk-doc > - python package puts files into %{python_sitearch}/gtk-2.0 (sic!) and needs to > require pygtk2 > - python package puts files into %{_datadir}/pygtk/2.0/defs and needs to > require gnome-python2 > - vala package puts files into %{_datadir}/vala/vapi and needs to require vala Fixed. > Other questions: > - Why is there a doc package anway? Usually gtk-doc is part of the devel > package. People who don't want the docs can still install it with > --excludedocs. Because there was a push a while ago to move all docs into noarch packages to reduce the size of the overall mirror. > - Should %{_libdir}/ethos/plugin-loaders/libpythonloader.so be part of the > python package? Done. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos-0.2.2-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:50:32 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553902] Review Request: rubygem-gemcutter - The gemcutter client gem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091650.o09GoW3P019521@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553902 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 11:50:30 EST --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-gemcutter.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-gemcutter-0.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:48:51 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091648.o09GmpCl019051@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 11:48:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > I added autoheader to %build before configure, even then autoheader is being > > > called again. > > > > - Would you try aclocal -> autoheader -> autoconf -> automake ? > > still the same. - Then forcely modify the timestamps of autotools related files to prevent autotools from being called after configure like: ---------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p0 -b .configure aclocal autoconf automake autoheader touch -r configure \ config.h.in \ Makefile.in \ aclocal.m4 ---------------------------------------------------- > BTW how do you save the build.log. I use rpmbuild -ba to create > rpm. - You can use "tee" command like $ rpmbuild -ba foo.spec 2>&1 | tee build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:52:58 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553908] Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making tests easy on the fingers and eyes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091652.o09GqwGo019944@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553908 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 11:52:56 EST --- Buildrequirements have been fixed: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-shoulda.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-shoulda-2.10.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 16:55:24 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553898] Review Request: rubygem-jeweler - Craft the perfect RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091655.o09GtOY3020501@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553898 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2010-01-09 11:55:21 EST --- The rcov buildrequires is in there, it's just commented out as it's only need in %check which we can't execute now anyways, because of the buildrequires for %check that are not in Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:10:25 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091710.o09HAPB2024204@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-09 12:10:24 EST --- * Sat Jan 9 2010 Orion Poplawski - 1.1-3 - Drop gcj support - Fix javadoc group - Bump java levels in pom.xml http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-jexl-1.1-3.fc12.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/apache-commons-jexl.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1911407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:07:20 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091707.o09H7K4P025940@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #14 from Roshan Singh 2010-01-09 12:07:14 EST --- Okay it is working fine now. In the %doc section i think it will be better to copy the entire Samplescript directory instead of copying the files inside it, %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README TODO Samplescripts Is it okay ? What is you nick on IRC ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:13:28 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091713.o09HDSlJ024762@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski 2010-01-09 12:13:24 EST --- Looks good, just this left: - Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now Also, does it make sense to add a pom.xml for maven dep handling? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:14:14 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551838] Review Request: opendchub - A hub software for Direct Connect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091714.o09HEERf024883@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551838 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-01-09 12:14:10 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README TODO Samplescripts > > Is it okay ? - No problem. > What is you nick on IRC ? - I have never used IRC... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:18:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:18:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091718.o09HIC9c028202@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2010-01-09 12:18:07 EST --- Some minor updates. Nobody had caught the libtool archives that were still hanging around either :-) SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:23:44 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 553055] Review Request: gpxe - Open Source network bootloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091723.o09HNiKw026992@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2010-01-09 12:23:41 EST --- What's the idea for shipping the source in -devel...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:29:57 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091729.o09HTvtH028265@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #58 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-09 12:29:51 EST --- > how to "bake in" the result at build time in a way that works in a cross-arch "cross-arch" should read "multilib-safe" here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:29:10 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531379] Review Request: apache-commons-jexl - Java Expression Language (JEXL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091729.o09HTAYc028137@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531379 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 12:29:08 EST --- Looks good. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:28:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091728.o09HSCt7027982@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 --- Comment #57 from Dave Malcolm 2010-01-09 12:28:03 EST --- The remaining issues from comment #56: > - a reviewer needs to go through the full review guidelines on this Looking for a volunteer here. > - perhaps fixup rpm-build to avoid needing > find-provides-without-python-sonames.sh Deferred: I don't think this is needed before package import. > - fixup macros.python3 to bake in the definitions, avoid invoking python3 > each time Deferred: currently the script is arch-independent and goes in sysconfdir; it will lead to different results on 32-bit vs 64-bit archs. It's not clear to me how to "bake in" the result at build time in a way that works in a cross-arch way. Suggestions welcome. So I plan to punt this for now: I don't think it's necessary to fix this to pass package review, something to be fixed after package import. > - verify the script in comment #17 still works and that it verifies the 2 and > 3 packages are independent I'm working on this > - what files are affected when modifying shebangs, and how (see commment #39) I'm working on this > - anything else I've missed Does anyone have other concerns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 9 17:31:12 2010 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225942] Merge Review: jdepend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201001091731.o09HVCo5031061@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225942 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2010-01-09 12:31:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Looks good, just this left: > > - Guidelines use unversioned directory for javadoc now Fixed. > > Also, does it make sense to add a pom.xml for maven dep handling? I don't want to add pom.xml just for the sake of having it. If there is an actual request for it I'll add it immediately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.