[Fedora-packaging] kernel-module package naming
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.com
Tue Feb 22 17:05:12 UTC 2005
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 11:54 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:46:23AM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> >> Fedora Extras:
> >> openafs-module
> >> unionfs-module
> >
> >I don't like this. How are we supposed to refer to these packages in
> >the yum configuration for installonly? *-module might collide with
> >other packages that aren't kernel modules (apache module? perl
> >module?). I like kernel-module-unionfs because it is clear that it is
> >a kernel module, and we can use the kernel-module-* glob in yum
> >configuration.
>
> This seems reasonable. Is anyone opposed to:
>
> kernel-module-GFS
> kernel-module-openafs
> kernel-module-unionfs
> kernel-module-ati
> kernel-module-nvidia
Could we also evolve to a lowercase standard for package names ? This
example shows a clear example of why uppercase or mixed case could be
confusing or problematic.
Other distributions already moved (or are evolving) to lower case as the
default. (Even though perl is a good exception where uppercase and strict
names are important)
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list