[Fedora-packaging] Template .spec file for conventions?

Gavin Henry ghenry at suretecsystems.com
Mon Feb 28 22:27:47 UTC 2005

On Monday 28 Feb 2005 21:51, Scott Lawrence wrote:
> It looks as though there's a consensus developed around how packages
> should be named.  Being fairly new to rpm building, I have not
> understood all the details of the discussions around how best to
> implement those conventions.   Might it be possible for one of you who
> does understand it to supplement the naming guidelines with a
> skeleton .spec file that illustrates how to do it, along with whatever
> is required of the surrounding build system?

You need to install fedora-rpmdevtools for the rpmbuild directory see:


And for specfiles:


General ideas see:






Kind Regards,

Gavin Henry.
Managing Director.

T +44 (0) 1224 279484
M +44 (0) 7930 323266
F +44 (0) 1224 742001
E ghenry at suretecsystems.com

Open Source. Open Solutions(tm).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20050228/64eb3d57/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list