[Fedora-packaging] Re: DKMS into Fedora Extras

[Ville Skyttä]

On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:48 -0500, seth vidal wrote:

> Right now I'm thinking:
>  kernel modules must have kernel-version-release in the package name for
> the kernel module - this makes for irritating package naming and cvs
> naming but <shrug>

I support this because I haven't seen a better solution.  But IMO the
CVS naming is a no go.  There should be one dir per one module package
in CVS, not one for each module package for a specific kernel, otherwise
it's a major PITA to maintain.  I imagine it isn't too hard to achieve
that.