Tom 'spot' Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Fri Feb 25 13:56:30 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 15:26 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>I don't see why we should add cruft to our release tags to help people
>shoot their own feet either. I'm not going to start flamewar over this -
>there are worse things in life that RPMforge disttags :) but I simply
>don't see no value added whatsoever by trying to create an upgrade path
>for *extras* when one doesn't exist for the actual products.
Here's the point: Its not mandatory. If you're not trying to work the
"single spec/multiple Fedoras" case, then don't use it.
The standard will make that very clear.
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
More information about the Fedora-packaging