[Fedora-packaging] Updated kernel-module-packaging example with ndiswrapper (Was: example kernel-module package)

Thorsten Leemhuis fedora at leemhuis.info
Sun Jul 3 17:31:17 UTC 2005


Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2005, 19:34 +0300 schrieb Ville Skyttä:
> On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 17:25 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 03.07.2005, 09:21 -0500 schrieb Tom 'spot' Callaway:
> 
> > > > - The main kernel-module package is now named
> > > > "kernel-module-%{mainpkgname}-base" (if someones knows something better
> > > > then "base" tell me). 
> > > Perhaps instead of -base, it could be -source. I'm ambivalent on that,
> > > really.
> > Yeah, source might be better. Changed.
> (Still has the -debuginfo problem.)

See other mail

> > Don't ask me why. Anyone any idea what's wrong here?
> 
> rpm's erasure ordering is known to still have problems (not only the
> CLI; yum exhibits the same problem).  This problem is not limited to
> kernel module packages nor leftover dirs; for example %postun scriptlets
> are affected too (/boot/System.map-%{kver} may have disappeared in this
> case).  Dunno if PreReq instead of Requires, or Requires +
> Requires(postun) instead of Requires would help.

I tried
 Requires(postun): /boot/System.map-%{kver}
 Requires(postun): kernel-%{_target_cpu} = %{kver}
before and tried with PreReq now also -- Nothing helped.

-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>




More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list