[Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez at ivazquez.net
Wed Jun 29 00:56:45 UTC 2005

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 19:40 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> Version: 1.1
> (where the value in the Version field is equivalent to the kernel module
> version, NOT the kernel version we're building against (in this example,
> "1", followed by the build revision, in this example ".1")

> If a bugfix needs to be made to the package, then the .1 (build
> revision) is incremented. If a new version of the kernel driver is
> released, then the first part of the Version is incremented, and the
> build revision is reset to .1 (if it is not .1).

Where do you propose that we put the version number of the module
itself, if it's not an integer (e.g., 0.6.3)? Should we have in
that case?

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20050628/44e5fe84/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list