[Fedora-packaging] Kernel modules (was: Re: tpctl in extras missing dependancy for kernel-module-thinkpad)

Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org
Thu Jun 30 01:48:19 UTC 2005

On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:55:59PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> Honestly? I agree. Even if it means we end up with two copies of the
> full source in two SRPMS.
> Unless someone is violently opposed to splitting the SRPMS as policy
> (and can come up with a way to resolve the unnecessary userland package
> bumps/rebuilds), thats what I'm inclined to adopt.

I'm fine with this or with the ifarch conditional plan -- either way has its
ugliness. :)

Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit.

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list