[Fedora-packaging] disttag

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Mar 1 14:41:02 UTC 2005

On Mar 1 mars 2005 14:41, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 05:56 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> It doesn't matter to me. I'd prefer the extra period in the Release
>>> field with the simplified conditionals, but if everyone else prefers
>>> the
>>> other way around, then I'll document the other way.
>>+1 to Enrico's view. A simple and clean %{?disttag} appended to the
>> release
>>field. And since it can expand to virtually everything, don't abuse it
>> for
>>conditionally _guessing_ build platforms.
> Let me reiterate. I am fundamentally opposed to a disttag that can
> "expand to virtually everything". Hence, the macro definition of
> disttag, and the limitation of the defined possiblities.

In this case do the defined possibilities take into account rawhide and
test systems ?


Nicolas Mailhot

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list