[Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
dawson at fnal.gov
Wed Mar 2 16:51:41 UTC 2005
As we are currently working on our openafs package, I want to make sure
our kernel modules for it conform to what was agreed upon. But other
than the naming, I didn't see a definate 'this is how to do them' list.
(If I missed that, point me to it)
Here's what I saw. My example will be openafs, but I am meaning this
for others as well.
Requires: kernel = 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL
Then the discussion shifted to whether yum and apt would be able to
handle this. And there seemed to be a rumble of "it can be done, but it
won't be pretty"
Am I missing a thread? Is this really the way we are planning on doing
Troy Dawson dawson at fnal.gov (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
More information about the Fedora-packaging