[Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?
dawson at fnal.gov
Thu Mar 3 19:06:20 UTC 2005
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:46 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>>(Do we need the additional "Provides: kernel-module-openafs",
>>isn't that a given, since the Name: is the same?)
> Right, not needed.
> I see there's no "Provides: kernel-modules" or somesuch, was that left
> out on purpose?
Sorry about that. You are correct. When I was writting that I not only
had up the e-mails from this list, but also a spec file from our older
openafs kernel-module. I basically cut and pasted one too many.
p.s. Sorry for the delay, I wrote that e-mail and then got tied up in a
bunch of other stuff.
Troy Dawson dawson at fnal.gov (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/CSS CSI Group
More information about the Fedora-packaging