[Fedora-packaging] kernel-module rpm's - final decision?

Troy Dawson dawson at fnal.gov
Thu Mar 3 19:06:20 UTC 2005

Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 13:46 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>>(Do we need the additional "Provides: kernel-module-openafs",
>>isn't that a given, since the Name: is the same?)
> Right, not needed.
> I see there's no "Provides: kernel-modules" or somesuch, was that left
> out on purpose?

Sorry about that.  You are correct.  When I was writting that I not only 
had up the e-mails from this list, but also a spec file from our older 
openafs kernel-module.  I basically cut and pasted one too many.

p.s. Sorry for the delay, I wrote that e-mail and then got tied up in a 
bunch of other stuff.

Troy Dawson  dawson at fnal.gov  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list