[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Sat Mar 5 02:02:18 UTC 2005

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:52:40 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> > > Mea culpa.  Sylpheed was in Core and I wanted gpgme-1.0 in Core so I patched
> > > it to use the newer gpgme and it was accepted upstream.  Now sylpheed's out
> > > and we still don't have gpgme-1.0 in Core.  (kmail uses it...)
> > 
> > GnuPG 2 is not ready. Hence GPGME 1.0.x could not be built with the S/MIME
> > part (aka GPGSM).
> > 
> True.  But gpgme doesn't have a hard requirement on gnupg 2.  In line with
> the two steps forward, one step backwards philosophy, I'd be happy with a
> gpgme-1 that only uses gnupg-1 and add S/Mime features when gnupg 2 is
> ready.  This gets us a kmail with some signing support.  OTOH, I mainly
> want to use gpgme in my code, not for any mailer.  So for me, Extras
> is good enough.

Last time I looked, kmail was built with an internal GPGME 0.4.4 copy,
and its OpenPGP features worked for me.

$ rpmlsv kdepim |grep -i gpgme
-rwxr-xr-x root  root       787 /usr/lib/libgpgme++.la
lrwxrwxrwx root  root        19 /usr/lib/libgpgme++.so.0
-rwxr-xr-x root  root    228304 /usr/lib/libgpgme++.so.0.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x root  root       906 /usr/lib/libqgpgme.la
lrwxrwxrwx root  root        18 /usr/lib/libqgpgme.so.0
-rwxr-xr-x root  root     20048 /usr/lib/libqgpgme.so.0.0.0
drwxr-xr-x root  root         0 /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdepim-apidocs/libkdenetwork/qgpgme
drwxr-xr-x root  root         0 /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kdepim-apidocs/libkdenetwork/qgpgme/html

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list