[Fedora-packaging] Python Packaging Hints
Alan Milligan
alan at balclutha.org
Mon Sep 19 16:31:58 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>Hmmm... Yes; rhpl's Makefiles seem to make some rather problematic
>assumptions. What other packages do you know have similarly fragile
>upstream build scripts?
Since we're not accepting python-2.4, I've not downloaded very much of
the FC4 stack to discover exactly what's still broken. In this case, I
think I was curious to see if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135657 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135657 had been
released as we need a proper extended url basic http authentication
syntax to allow up2date to connect to our servers. Again, these patches
were submitted almost a year ago, and we still have to maintain our own
forks :(
>>make PYTHON=python%{pythonversion} PYTHONINCLUDE=%{pythoninclude}
>>LIBDIR=/lib
>Why the LIBDIR? That would seems to break things for x86_64 with no
>apparent gain.
Dunno - there was obviously something screwed with the link-edit step.
I'm a little surpised that /lib is not on the default link-library path
in the first place ...
Alan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDLuf+CfroLk4EZpkRAluiAKDQPrvl1+dzlC/4cVU+j4XF9/WNdACfVRdC
zJ6eqgT+rBOTm+ZFXh2w4k0=
=IfYK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list