[Fedora-packaging] Re: atrpms kernel modules

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 16:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:

> There is the kmdl proposal which doesn't even need any special plugins
> to remain rpm-compliant for both rpm and all depsolvers and while
> support for coinstalls for new kernels is missing in all depsolvers it
> proved to be trivial to add a < 100 lines easy to maintain plugin to
> accomplish that. So there really is only the I-don't-like-uname-r-
> in-name issue left ...

Axel, what are the differences between the "kmdl" proposal and the
existing Fedora kernel module standard? Can you summarize for me?

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!