[Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposal: reject the one-spec approach

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >There is exactly one (1) package in Fedora and lives only in FE5.
> 
> +2 more in cvs that are not build ATM (thinkpad-lkmod and lirc-kmod)
> 
> +7 under review
> 
> +6 in lvn

-67 in ATrpms

Looks like you're raising this to an ATrpms vs livna issue? I thought
we wanted to merge ...

> >This guerilla tactics are becoming ugly.
> 
> That's why I think it's time that spot as leader of this group IMHO 
> jumps in. Otherwise we waste a lot of time arguing without results.

When he showed he tends to a uname-r-in-version solution you seem to
have activated all your muscles against it even though you promised
otherwise before.

You still have your chance to reject it in fesco.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060815/37074271/attachment.sig>