[Fedora-packaging] Re: Packaging/Guidelines - Usage of %{optflags}

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Thu Aug 24 19:31:27 UTC 2006


On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:28:31PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:24:12PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 23:46 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > thank you for your fast response. In
> > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?action=diff#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448
> > > > you only mention C and C++ Compilers,
> > > > rpm --eval %configure
> > > > shows, that also FFLAGS, which I believe are for Fortran, are set with the 
> > > > values of %optflags.
> > 
> > If you really want to be picky, you'd have to mention FCFLAGS,
> > too. Which is actually a bug in current FC6, let me think a bit about
> > it.
> 
> Hm, looks like it's broken on FC5, too. :/
> 
> Probably not that many fortran packages to make this surface.

BTW what needs fixing are rpm and/or redhat-rpm-config, not the
guidelines, the guidelines are OK.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060824/74f8201e/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list