[Fedora-packaging] static subpackages (was: sparse 0.2, headers and static lib)

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Dec 6 05:06:32 UTC 2006

On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 22:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:58:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > 
> > Additional complications can arise from "shared/common files" and from
> > config files (E.g. some *.la's and *.pc's are not unlikely to become
> > problematic). They need to be looked after on a case by case basis.
> It's annoying that the .pc file includes a libdir=/usr/lib64, else a
> -devel (without the .a) could be noarch. :-(  As it stands, we won't
> be able to install the -devel as multi-arch because all the .h files
> will conflict.
Even then it can't be noarch.  rpm(build) doesn't allow different archs
for different subpackages.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061205/f651c325/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list