[Fedora-packaging] Re: iconcache, v0.5
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Dec 22 14:06:54 UTC 2006
On Friday 22 December 2006 08:37, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Sigh, problem being, we've now been waiting 14+ months for this
> theoretical better mechanism. You're willing to wait indefinitely? Not
> me. Further, I vehemently argue that problem is outside the scope of
> packaging guidelines. Let's try to keep focus on what we (as packaging
> committee) *can* solve, please.
I'm not keen on creating rules to "force" the issue though. That is not a
good "use" of our power. We have constraints to work within, those
constraints being what the operating system can handle. Lets not make this a
political thing. We're not going to go ban the use of ldconfig in %post
until the rpm folks work out a way to do it in stages when needed, so why
would we do it for icon cache too?
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061222/45ff3b96/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list