[Fedora-packaging] Re: iconcache, v0.5
jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Dec 22 14:26:21 UTC 2006
On Friday 22 December 2006 09:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
> imo, ldconfig example isn't a good one, but I get your point.
> Difference being here, messing with ldconfig can horribly break things.
> A stale iconcache doesn't break anything, at worst only affects app
> startup time (a little).
Ah! I missed this point. If the above statement is true, I'm all for it. I
had thought we were going down the road of making a rule that would leave the
cache unupdated period, and Some Other Process As Of Yet Unwritten would have
to clean up behind us. If this happens already, and all the end user sees is
a slight delay, I'm for it.
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fedora-packaging