[Fedora-packaging] Re: iconcache, v0.5

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Fri Dec 22 14:29:28 UTC 2006

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 09:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> imo, ldconfig example isn't a good one, but I get your point.
>> Difference being here, messing with ldconfig can horribly break things.
>>   A stale iconcache doesn't break anything, at worst only affects app
>> startup time (a little).
> Ah!  I missed this point.  If the above statement is true, I'm all for it.  I 
> had thought we were going down the road of making a rule that would leave the 
> cache unupdated period, and Some Other Process As Of Yet Unwritten would have 
> to clean up behind us.  If this happens already, and all the end user sees is 
> a slight delay, I'm for it.

Yay!  Christmas came early!

-- Rex

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list