[Fedora-packaging] Conflicts Draft Proposal

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 14:02 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 20:55 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le mardi 05 décembre 2006 à 13:22 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> > 
> > > The example is poor in that aspect. If you assume that foo-game needs
> > > bar, but will not work with older versions of bar (this is the normal
> > > case), then the example holds. I'll update the wording to reflect this.
> > 
> > Please also make sure your proposal covers the case explained there :
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-November/msg00026.html
> 
> I think the rationale presented there for Conflicts use is OK.
> 
> Again, the policy is "No use of Conflicts: without good reason". If you
> have a good reason, we'll approve it, you document it in the spec, and
> we all move on. :)

Operation "have spot document my conflict on his wiki page" failed

Damn :)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061205/a5b872da/attachment.sig>