[Fedora-packaging] Re: what policy for python egg files

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:01:27PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 22:40 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:33:19PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 19:49 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > The equivalent to *.pc files seem to be the .egg-info subdirs. So we
> > > > don't need to ship the egg file in addition within the rpm file, but
> > > > still feed the egg packaging system with information.

> I think it was confusion from inexact wording in the original post.  I
> knew what lmacken had been doing in Turbo* packages so I replied with
> the idea that "egg files" meant these files inside the .egg-info
> directory.  Meanwhile you took it to mean the zipped up PACKAGE.egg
> files.  
> 
> In any case, it looks like TurboMail was approved and the cvs version
> shows that it's including the .egg_info directory not the .egg files.
> 
> I think we're in agreement that this is the correct way to go?

Fully. :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061218/19e2ba8b/attachment.sig>