[Fedora-packaging] More Mono confusion
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Tue Dec 19 15:10:41 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:36 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
> So my question is: is my package in error, or is it avahi-sharp? Should
> I set $MONO_PATH in /usr/bin/lat?
I believe Avahi-sharp should be fixed to follow the mono packaging
guideline. There's been a bug opened on this for a while, but I've been
fairly busy and haven't had any time to look into it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185692
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20061219/517f3f38/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-packaging
mailing list