[Fedora-packaging] Re: iconcache, v0.5
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Fri Dec 22 14:29:28 UTC 2006
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 09:22, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> imo, ldconfig example isn't a good one, but I get your point.
>> Difference being here, messing with ldconfig can horribly break things.
>> A stale iconcache doesn't break anything, at worst only affects app
>> startup time (a little).
> Ah! I missed this point. If the above statement is true, I'm all for it. I
> had thought we were going down the road of making a rule that would leave the
> cache unupdated period, and Some Other Process As Of Yet Unwritten would have
> to clean up behind us. If this happens already, and all the end user sees is
> a slight delay, I'm for it.
Yay! Christmas came early!
More information about the Fedora-packaging