[Fedora-packaging] Re: atrpms kernel modules

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 12:06:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 17:51 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> > BTW, when we initially discussed the kmod standard there was also (IIRC)
> > a strong resistance from multiple important and well known people at
> > redhat against overloading %{NAME} with the output of "uname -r". I
> > doubt that option changed. Spot? Jeremy? f13?
> 
> Yep. I'm still very strongly against overloading %{NAME}. We don't
> permit any other package to do this for any reason, and I don't want to
> start now. Name is not for versioning.

Well, it's good to know as that kills any review attempt of the
current scheme.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060721/bc41b478/attachment.sig>