[Fedora-packaging] PHP guidelines

Enrico Scholz enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
Tue Jul 25 15:39:49 UTC 2006


tibbs at math.uh.edu (Jason L Tibbitts III) writes:

> ES> IMO, drafts should reflect the state of current discussion and
> ES> should be updated. It does not help when discussion on maillist is
> ES> ignored and some obsolete document will be ratified.
>
> If you're trying to tell me that I shouldn't have tried then I'll be
> happy to stop.

No; I just think that the proposer of a draft shall maintain and update
it.

Wrong/outdated information is much more worse than missing one.



Enrico
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060725/d06aa6a8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list