[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] fedora-newrpmspec patch for php-pear



On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:07 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu> wrote:
>
> > %perl_sitearch  %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitearch`"; echo $installsitearch)
> > %perl_sitelib   %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installsitelib`"; echo $installsitelib)
> > %perl_vendorarch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorarch`"; echo $installvendorarch)
> > %perl_vendorlib  %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo $installvendorlib)
> > %perl_archlib   %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installarchlib`"; echo $installarchlib)
> > %perl_privlib   %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installprivlib`"; echo $installprivlib)
> 
> Okay, I have updated the macros file here:
> 
> http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/macros.pear
> 
> Let me know if this looks okay.

We have leading-underscoreless %perl_* in rpm, %python_* in spec
templates and upstream rpm, and %ruby_* in the forthcoming ruby spec
template and ruby packaging guidelines; any reason for pear/pecl to be
different?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]