[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Java Naming Page



Le vendredi 14 juillet 2006 à 12:55 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a
écrit :
> >>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net> writes:
> 
> NM> What's different is the package inter-dependencies.
> 
> So they get to violate our in-place packaging and naming conventions?
> Just because they have lots of dependencies?

Our naming conventions are not tables of law, they were written to solve
specific problems and the people who wrote them didn't think about this
particular case, so now they'll have to think about it, come with a
solution, put it in the guidelines and everyone will be happy.

Instead of screaming "they're not following the holy guidelines" please
spent 5s thinking about what the guidelines are about (solve technical
problems).

I'd have thought the somewhat irritated intervention of Paul Nasrat and
all the posts about technicalities vs æsthetics would have make all this
clean.

(and BTW these people don't _need_ the guidelines, they were doing
inter-repo multi-package-updater updates when Fedora Core was still
thinking "the next anaconda run will clean it all")

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]