[Fedora-packaging] Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 08:29, Axel Thimm wrote:
> It makes more sense to include a conditional epoch or target/arch in
> the buildroot that the builder. In fact the best thing for a
> buildsystem is to override the buildroot adding a build-id to it
> anyway.

Or what we REALLY should do is have rpm(build) supplant a standard buildroot 
when one isn't found in the spec file, so we can REMOVE Buildroot from the 
spec file all together and no longer have these discussions.  Instead of 
nitpicking on how the buildroot should look, we just say 'remove buildroot 
definitions'.  That's KISS.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060719/9b4fa01b/attachment.sig>