[Fedora-packaging] Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 08:51, Axel Thimm wrote:
> I would agree, if it weren't for undefined behaviour at best when
> someone uses the buildroot-less specfile on a system not supplying a
> default buildroot.
>
> In the worst case you could end up with an empty buildroot and
> %install/%clean operations on the buildroot could suddenly really
> happen in the live filesystem.

Have you tried (within a chroot) to build a package w/out a chroot on our 
modern rpm?  (I haven't yet, other things to do today...)

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060719/69ed4698/attachment.sig>