[Fedora-packaging] Re: Request to drop %(%{__id_u} -n) in preferred buildroot

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:08, Axel Thimm wrote:
> The only thing would be a clarification of the wording that the
> "preferred buildroot" as quoted in the guidelines is a SHOULD item as
> the word "preferred" implies. I don't want to fight this battle with
> each review on every package I submit.

Sure, it's a should.  I still say "Buildroot SHOULD be <foo>" even if they 
have a Buildroot defined.  Its their choice to follow the advice.  I don't 
block on it (anymore).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060719/fb3d190d/attachment.sig>