[Fedora-packaging] Re: BuildRoot

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 06:29:28PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > But the scheme above even takes care of your multiuser-
> > build-the-same-package-corner-case, so at least you have no reason not
> > to be happy.
> == no substantial progress on features in comparison to the current FE
> recommendation.

Apples are not more yellow than oranges.

redhat-rpm-config patch: always ensures sane coherent buildroots, no
			 matter what the specfile
guideline:		 a disputable, non-mandatory recommendation

> > > - Do %name, %version, %release always expand correctly (Rpm suffers from
> > >   a bug, where at least %name or %version (I don't recall exactly)
> > >   occasionally is not being expanded correctly)?
> > 
> > URL?
> 
> Sorry, none.
> [...]
> Unfortunately I don't have an example at hand to reproduce it.

Let's file it under hear-say then and move on.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060725/52c61f09/attachment.sig>