[Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: BuildRoot

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Tue Jul 25 20:47:00 UTC 2006


Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 13:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 12:40 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> >> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 18:41 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Let's file it under hear-say then and move on.
>> >>> No comment
>> >>>
>> >>> c.f. below and note the output of the "echos".
>> >> I think it's safe to just say this is an example of bad rpm practice.
>> >> If you really want/need two different sources and versions, package
>> >> them separately.
>> > 
>> > ... you are ignoring the fact that there exist cases where this is
>> > impossible.
>> 
>> Seriously, it's bad practice, don't do it.  But don't mind me, go ahead
>> and do it, if it's so "impossible" to do otherwise...
> 
> Check out any one tree style built GCC+newlib rpm,

Should be fine, only one
Version:
tag.

> check out autogen + libopts (currently under review).

Couldn't find that one.  Pointer?

-- Rex





More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list