[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: BuildRoot



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 15:47 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

>>> Check out any one tree style built GCC+newlib rpm,
>> Should be fine, only one
>> Version:
>> tag.
> What you say is equivalent to assigning GCC the version of an OS's libc
> rsp. vice versa.
> 
> Pardon, but politeness prohibits to further comment on this.
> 
>>> check out autogen + libopts (currently under review).
>> Couldn't find that one.  Pointer?
> currently under review == Review request in bugzilla:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197814
> 
> autogen-5.8.x ships with libopts-27.1.2.tar.gz integrated
> A proper way to build libopts would be to generate
> libopts-27.1.2*rpms and autogen-5.8.x*rpms from it.

This discussion is digressing even further offtopic, but...
IMO, the "proper way"  would be to build bootstraps (gcc+newlib and
autogen+libopts), then use those to build *separately* each of
gcc,newlib and autogen,libopts.  Then, no overloading of Version would
be required.

-- Rex


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]