[Fedora-packaging] Mono Packaging Issues

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Wed Jun 14 20:34:48 UTC 2006

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 22:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 14:56 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway a écrit :
> > If the mono package does not include .so files, it should be BuildArch:
> > noarch and use /usr/lib.
> Why on earth do you want it in /usr/lib if you know it's
> arch-independant ?

Because they're still libraries, in a weird perverted Windowsy way?

It might be worth examining exactly what Debian/Ubuntu/SuSE do here.

Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list