[Fedora-packaging] Mono Packaging Issues

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Thu Jun 15 07:01:14 UTC 2006

Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 15:33 -0700, Ian Burrell a écrit :
> Probably not worth the trouble for LHS purity.

If you don't aim for LHS purity, the FSB secret police will get at you.

More seriously you're confusing the LSB as a whole with the FHS it

LSB is crap nobody expects you to follow it.
FHS is fairly good and followed closely my all big distros. Users do
expect Fedora to follow it. As previous RHL/FC examples proved, you can
duck your head on the sand and say the FHS didn't write some_decision,
but some_decision will still be online in the spec users read, and after
a few years of harassment by users demanding why you don't apply
some_decision you'll have a change of heart and decide applying it is
not so painful after all (certainly less than handling all the bug
reports / support requests not applying it generates)

Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060615/3bc75f08/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list