[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 17:17 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Seems like a valid point to me. This should be something that isn't
> > difficult to audit, possibly even via automated script. Jesse, is this
> > something that could bootstrap into Brew?

Tom, perhaps.  Not any time soon though.

> You are aware what other distros do/did? They let the build-system chose
> release tag to make sure it's unique and consistent.
> 

That works for specs that have %{?dist}, not so much for packages that
are hardcoded.  We will have to file bugs and thwap maintainers to use
%{?dist} when it becomes available or follow the guidelines wrt what
they use.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060616/b784aea6/attachment.sig>