[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps

Jesse Keating jkeating at j2solutions.net
Fri Jun 16 16:17:52 UTC 2006

On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Well, on one hand you told "Same packaging conventions in FC as in FE",
> the other hand you are telling "%{dist} won't ever be in brew".
> => project has failed even before it started? 

Not once has anybody said %{?dist} wouldn't be used in brew.  Not once.
Please don't speak for us.  I have stated that it is not _currently_
used but that I will be working to get it used post Test1.  Just chill.

Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060616/f4814505/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list