[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps

Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs at math.uh.edu
Fri Jun 16 17:36:24 UTC 2006

>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> writes:

NM> Unfortunately for you, that's both the common practice and what
NM> the guidelines advocate

For me?  Not at all.  For upstream?  Well, if someone comes to them
saying there are problems with 2.7 when 2.7 doesn't exist yet, then
that's unfortunate for them.

It looks to me [1] like this is a dated snapshot and would, according to
the guidelines, carry the last released version and a release tag
consisting of the last build number incremented by one, a period, and
the snapshot date.

1) The tarball name is dejavu-sfd-20060614-943.tar.gz which doesn't
   carry a 2.7 version anywhere.  The internal documentation doesn't
   refer to 2.7 anywhere.

 - J<

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list