[Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Jun 16 23:18:16 UTC 2006

On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 01:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The _number_ is irrelevant if the people on the committee are in
> agreement, but things in Core are done differently nevertheless. Inside
> RH, there ought to be an instance of people who review the existing
> Packaging Guidelines and announce whether and where we can make the step
> from "guidelines" to "policies".

Guidelines are policies for new packages.  We haven't yet broached the
touchy subject of mass changes to all existing packages, however we're
doing those piece by piece.  Example fixing the BuildRequires.  Next
could be NEVR or something similar.

Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/attachments/20060616/a1dbed9a/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-packaging mailing list